Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: emerging clinical information and its implications

Safety and immunogenicity of 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine formulations with and without aluminum phosphate and comparison of the formulation of choice with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in elderly adults: a randomized open-label trial

This randomized open-label trial was designed to provide preliminary immunogenicity and safety data to support development of the pediatric 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) for adults. The aims were to: identify an age-appropriate PCV13 formulation, i.e., with (n = 309) or without (n = 304) aluminum phosphate (AlPO 4); compare the selected PCV13 formulation (n = 309) with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23; n = 301); and, together with an extension study, assess sequential use of pneumococcal vaccines at 1-year intervals in adults aged ≥65 years (n = 105) not pre-vaccinated with PPSV23. Immune responses were measured by ELISA and opsonophagocytic activity assays 1 month postvaccination. Immunoglobulin G responses elicited by PCV13 with AlPO 4 and PCV13 without AlPO 4 were similar for the majority, and noninferior for all PCV13 serotypes. PCV13 with AlPO 4 was generally more reactogenic, with reactions mainly mild or moderate. Thus, PCV13 with AlPO 4 (hereafter PCV13) became the selected formulation. Immune responses to PCV13 were noninferior for all but one serotype and for most PCV13 serotypes superior to PPSV23. Vaccine sequence assessments showed that for PCV13/PPSV23, the initial PCV13 dose generally enhanced responses to a subsequent PPSV23 dose, compared with PPSV23 alone. For PCV13/PCV13, a second dose did not enhance the first dose response when given after 1 year. For PCV13/PPSV23/PCV13, priming with PCV13 (vaccination 1) did not protect against lower responses induced by PPSV23 to subsequent PCV13 (vaccination 3). In conclusion, the pediatric PCV13 formulation with AlPO 4 is well tolerated and immunogenic in adults, is generally more immunogenic than PPSV23, and subsequent vaccination with PPSV23 is possible if required.

Preventing pneumococcal disease in the elderly: recent advances in vaccines and implications for clinical practice

Streptococcus pneumoniae remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. To date, after the introduction of routine childhood immunization, elderly people (i.e., persons aged 65 years or older) suffer the greatest burden of pneumococcal disease in developed countries. At present, two anti-pneumococcal vaccines are available for use in adults: the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) and the 13-valent protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PCV13). This article reviews current data about the burden of pneumococcal disease in the elderly, as well as evidence for immunogenicity, clinical efficacy, and possible cost-effectiveness of both vaccines. The main advantage of PCV13 is that it may be more effective than PPV23, but a major limitation is that it is directed against strains that are likely to be greatly reduced in the population since its introduction in childhood immunization. The main disadvantage of PPV23 is that it may be less effective than PCV13 against vaccine-type infections but a major advantage is that it may provide protection against ten additional serotypes. To date, expert committees have not changed recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in adults. However, at present, they are evaluating different alternatives (basically, maintaining PPV23, changing from PPV23 to PCV13 in some groups, or adding PCV13 for all or some target adult population subgroups). Critical data (clinical efficacy reported in ongoing trials and magnitude of indirect effects of pediatric PCV13 programs) needed to make a well-informed decision could be available during 2013. Considering all concerns over indirect effects and replacement strains following the use of polysaccharide-based vaccines, efforts should be directed toward developing vaccines, such as protein-based pneumococcal vaccines, with potential serotype-independent protection. Meanwhile, according to current recommendations, PPV23 should continue to be used for high-risk adults and all elderly people (with and without additional high-risk conditions). Although it is only moderately effective, it has a considerable serotype coverage and at-risk persons can benefit from the vaccination. High-risk individuals could also obtain a benefit from adding PCV13, but more data are needed before a universal recommendation can be made.

Pneumococcal vaccination among adults with chronic respiratory diseases: a historical overview

Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia, remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The presence of chronic respiratory illness is a major risk factor for pneumonia, and smoking (the most common cause of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) is also an important risk factor for pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease. There are currently three established approaches to antipneumococcal vaccination: capsular polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines (recommended for adults and some children at risk), protein-polysaccharide conjugate pneumococcal vaccines (classically recommended for infants and young children and currently under evaluation for adults aged 50 years or older for the prevention of invasive disease) and experimental protein-based pneumococcal vaccines (under investigation in animal models). Although patients with chronic respiratory diseases are commonly described as an at-risk population for pneumococcal infections, studies on pneumococcal vaccination efficacy in such patients are very limited and vaccination effectiveness remains controversial. This paper reviews available data on the efficacy and effectiveness of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccination among adults with chronic respiratory diseases.

Hyporesponsiveness and its clinical implications after vaccination with polysaccharide or glycoconjugate vaccines

Hyporesponsiveness (immune tolerance) follows vaccination with meningococcal polysaccharide and many pneumococcal polysaccharide serotypes. Hyporesponsiveness after Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide vaccination has not been directly observed, but may follow exposure during disease in some individuals. Use of currently licensed conjugate vaccines has not been associated with hyporesponsiveness to date, with the possible exception of pneumococcal serotype 3. Introduction of polysaccharide vaccines anywhere into a conjugate vaccination schedule may result in reduced immune responses on subsequent exposure. This review of vaccine-induced hyporesponsiveness and its potential clinical implications considers recent evidence suggesting that hyporesponsiveness may occur for specific components of combined conjugate vaccines, such as pneumococcal serotype 3. These data have implications for the development of new multivalent vaccines.

Modeling the impact of a new vaccine on pneumococcal and nontypable Haemophilus influenzae diseases: a new simulation model

BACKGROUND

A heptavalent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-7) is available to immunize infants against pneumococcal disease. However, a recently developed vaccine, pneumococcal nontypable Haemophilus influenzae protein D-conjugate vaccine (PHiD-CV), has recently been licensed. PHiD-CV contains 3 additional Streptococcus pneumoniae serotypes and may provide protection against nontypable H influenzae (NTHi) infection. New health economic models are required to model the impact of PHiD-CV and compare its effectiveness with PCV-7.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this article was to design a model capable of projecting the pneumococcal and NTHi disease burden on the entire UK population under different schedules of PCV-7 and PHiD-CV. This model should also be capable of modeling the net indirect effect of vaccination (ie, the sum of serotype replacement and herd protection).

METHODS

A static, deterministic, age-compartmental model was created based on published information and the input of a board of experts in pneumococcal disease. The model presents results from both a payer-based and societal perspective. A 1-way sensitivity analysis was used to demonstrate the robustness of the model. Key parameters included the case fatality ratio for bacteremia, the hospitalization rate for acute otitis media (AOM), and parameters surrounding the extent of the net indirect effect of vaccination.

RESULTS

Excluding net indirect effect, 325 cases of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), 619 hospitalizations for pneumonia, and 9016 general practitioner visits for AOM would be prevented annually with the current PCV-7 2 + 1 program. These numbers would increase to 374, 755, and 30,920, respectively, using a PHiD-CV 2 + 1 regimen, or to 503, 994, and 47,180 using a PHiD-CV 3 + 1 regimen. When a net indirect effect of 38% is considered, health benefits could be much larger; 2417, 2451, and 3045 IPD cases would be prevented in the 3 scenarios, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

It is predicted that any vaccination program in the United Kingdom would have a striking impact on the incidence of all outcomes analyzed. A PHiD-CV 3 + 1 schedule is predicted to have a greater effect than PCV-7 in all scenarios. While the primary purpose of vaccination would be to prevent IPD and pneumonia hospitalizations, an additional benefit would be a noticeable reduction in AOM incidence. While the predictions made by the model were based on informed reasoning, all of its projected estimations remain approximations that are dependent on the inputs used to configure it, a limitation that is common to all simulation models.

Immunogenicity of a heptavalent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine administered concurrently with a combination diphtheria, tetanus, five-component acellular pertussis, inactivated polio, and Haemophilus influenzae type B vaccine and a meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine at 2, 3, and 4 months of age

The immunogenicities of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines have been demonstrated when they are administered at 2, 3, and 4 months of age. There is a paucity of data on the immunogenicity of this vaccine when it is administered concurrently with other vaccines in the primary immunization schedule of the United Kingdom. We immunized 55 term infants at 2, 3, and 4 months of age with the seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7), the meningococcal group C conjugate (MCC) vaccine, and the diphtheria, tetanus, five-component acellular pertussis, inactivated polio, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP(5)/IPV/Hib-TT) vaccine. The immune responses to the H. influenzae type b (Hib), MCC, and tetanus vaccines were measured at 2, 5, and 12 months of age; and the immune responses to PCV7 were measured at 2 and 5 months and then either at 12 months or following a 4th dose of PCV7. There were increases in the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of all antigens postimmunization. Greater than or equal to 90% of the infants achieved putatively protective levels postimmunization for all vaccine antigens except pneumococcal serotype 6B and Hib. The GMCs of the PCV7 serotypes increased following a 4th dose, although one infant had not reached putative levels of protection against serotype 6B. In conclusion, when infants were vaccinated according to the schedule described above, they had lower postprimary immunization responses to Hib, meningococcus group C capsular polysaccharide, and pneumococcal serotype 6B than the responses demonstrated by use of the other schedules. Despite this finding, there was a good response following a 4th dose of PCV7.

Vaccinate your child and save its grandparents from a heart attack? Current perspectives in antipneumococcal vaccination

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There are three established approaches to anti-pneumococcal vaccination: capsular polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV), protein-polysaccharide conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (CPV) and protein-based pneumococcal vaccine (PBPV). At present, only a 23-valent PPV for use in adults and a seven-valent CPV for use in infants are available in clinical practice. This study reviews available data on the efficacy of the available vaccines in different age groups and disease presentations, and the advantages and shortcomings of each type of vaccine, including future perspectives. Special attention is given to controversies regarding the efficacy of PPV against pneumonia in adults and its protective effects against myocardial infarction.

Advances in Pneumococcal Vaccines

Streptococcus pneumoniae causes considerable morbidity and mortality in the elderly. There are three established approaches to pneumococcal vaccination: polysaccharide vaccines, protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccines and protein-based vaccines. This article reviews advances in anti-pneumococcal vaccines, with reference to advantages and shortcomings for the elderly in particular. The 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) is currently recommended for high-risk patients and the general elderly population. Although the effectiveness of PPV against pneumonia is unclear, recent studies point to significant protective effects in preventing pneumococcal pneumonia and reducing the severity of disease in vaccinated elderly patients. PPV offers high serotype coverage and, although it is poorly immunogenic in some individuals, provides approximately 60% protection against invasive disease in the general elderly population. PPV vaccination appears cost effective for elderly patients although the vaccine might only be effective in preventing invasive disease. Additional benefits could mean a greater level of vaccine cost effectiveness. However, it is important to understand that PPV provides incomplete protection, especially in those with underlying high-risk conditions, and development of more effective pneumococcal vaccination strategies for elderly patients is still needed. In recent years, the most important advance in the prevention of pneumococcal infections in the elderly has been the introduction of a 7-valent conjugate pneumococcal vaccine (CPV) as a routine vaccination for infants. In addition to dramatically reducing invasive infection in children, CPV has been observed to have a considerable indirect protective effect in parents and grandparents. While the possibility of using CPV in elderly patients has been suggested, currently there are only limited immunogenicity data and no efficacy data in adults. The low serotype coverage is an important shortcoming and if CPV were to be used in the elderly, it would need to be given sequentially with the PPV. New CPVs covering more serotypes are currently under investigation, and these could be an alternative for use in all groups in the future. Numerous protein-based vaccine candidates offer the potential advantage of prevention against infections caused by all pneumococcal serotypes. Several are in various stages of development in animal models, but none can be expected to be available in clinical practice for several years at least. To date, the 23-valent PPV is still the best anti-pneumococcal vaccine option in the management of elderly persons. Introduction of the 7-valent CPV as a routine vaccine for children has provided considerable indirect benefits for older adults via herd immunity, but this vaccine has limited serotype coverage in elderly individuals. New CPVs including more serotypes (various CPVs are in different phases of pre-licensure studies) could prove to be good options in the future for all age groups. Several protein-based pneumococcal vaccine candidates (currently under investigation in animal models) offer the potential advantage of serotype independent protection, but none can be expected to be available in clinical practice in the near future.