Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: a genotype that is not 'easy-to-treat'

Resistance-associated substitutions after sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir triple therapy failure

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) resolve chronic HCV infection in >95% of patients, but a small percentage do not respond to DAA-based therapy. These may be difficult to treat because of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) emerging after treatment failure. Triple therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF)/velpatasvir (VEL)/voxilaprevir (VOX) is the recommended retreatment after DAA-based failure. However, in rare cases, failure to triple therapy occurs, and there is little information characterizing the viruses that relapse. To determine the RAS profile after failing SOF/VEL/VOX, and seek suitable alternatives for retreatment, samples from 5 patients were analysed using MiSeq Illumina deep sequencing before and after triple therapy. All patients were men, aged 59-78 years, 2 HCV genotype (G) 1b and 3 G3a. The most prevalent NS3 substitutions after SOF/VEL/VOX failure were Y56F and A166T. Four patients had the NS5A RAS, Y93H, after triple failure, and Y93H was observed in both G1b patients before retreatment and after SOF/ledipasvir failure. In 2 G3a patients, Y93H appeared at triple failure, and on the other G3a, A30K persisted in 100% of viral genomes. Finally, G1b patients showed C316N in NS5B, associated with SOF failure, but G3a patients had no known NS5B substitutions. HCV RAS analysis identified the following substitutions present at higher rates after triple failure: Y56F in NS3 (G1b), A166T in NS3 (G3a), A30K or Y93H in NS5A, and C316N in NS5B (G1b). A RAS-based salvage treatment (SOF + glecaprevir/pibrentasvir + RBV) was successfully used in one G3a patient.

Hepatitis C virus infection and new treatment strategies

Hepatitis C is a major public health problem worldwide. This disease is caused by the hepatitis C virus, which is characterised by its genetic diversity. The infection is usually asymptomatic. However, between 60% and 80% of HCV-infected individuals will progress to chronic hepatitis, 20% to liver cirrhosis in the medium-to long-term and, each year, between 1% and 4% of these patients with cirrhosis will develop hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A Spanish consensus document has recently been drafted to diagnose hepatitis C in a single step, consisting of active investigation (antibodies and viremia) in a single sample, which according to the experts, would reduce the time to access treatment and avoid tracking losses. To definitively change the hepatitis C treatment paradigm, direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) have been approved, whose development has been based on achieving cure rates close to 100% regardless of the genotype of the virus, ie, pangenotypes, with good tolerance and bioavailability. These drugs have constituted a real therapeutic revolution. Supplement information: This article is part of a supplement entitled «SEIMC External Quality Control Programme. Year 2016», which is sponsored by Roche, Vircell Microbiologists, Abbott Molecular and Francisco Soria Melguizo, S.A. © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosasy Microbiología Clínica. All rights reserved.

A first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single and multiple ascending oral dose study to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of BZF961 with and without ritonavir in healthy adult volunteers

Objective: Infection with hepatitis C virus is the leading indication for liver transplantation and most common cause of infectious disease-related mortality in the United States. BZF961 is a novel inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus NS3-4A protease. Methods: This sequential, three part exploratory first-in-human study investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple ascending oral doses of BZF961 in healthy subjects. The first two parts were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, time-lagged, single and multiple ascending oral dose segments. The third part analyzed the effect of ritonavir on BZF961 pharmacokinetics. Results: BZF961 was generally safe and well-tolerated in single and multiple oral doses in healthy subjects. There were no deaths and no serious adverse events. The most common adverse events were nausea and other gastrointestinal symptoms. Co-administration of ritonavir with BZF961 was well tolerated and increased BZF961 exposure by up to 60-fold, as well as reduced the overall exposure variability. Conclusions: BZF961 was generally safe and well-tolerated and its exposure was boosted by the co-administration of ritonavir.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: clinical features, current and emerging viral inhibitors, future challenges

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) represents a global burden on healthcare that affects over 150 million people worldwide. In the past, HCV genotype 3 was considered difficult to treat relative to other genotypes. Genotype 3 has been associated with a higher rate of complications, including fatty liver disease, fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality. However, with the advent of first- and second-generation direct-acting antivirals, genotype 3 can be treated effectively. Additionally, these new drugs are well tolerated by patients and have significantly fewer side effects compared to ribavirin and interferon-based regimens. However, while great strides have been made in overcoming biological barriers, our next challenge lies in overcoming economic and financial obstacles if we are to eradicate HCV genotype 3. Herein, we review the clinical features associated with HCV genotype 3, current and emerging treatment regimens, and challenges associated with treatment.

Peginterferon still has a place in the treatment of hepatitis C caused by genotype 3 virus

Despite recent advances in therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), the disease caused by genotype 3 virus (GEN3) is still considered a treatment challenge in certain patient subgroups. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the peginterferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination treatment for GEN3/CHC patients, and to evaluate sustained virological response (SVR) indicators and early treatment interruption due to serious adverse events (SAE). This was a retrospective observational study of GEN3/CHC patients, co-infected or not by HIV and treated with Peg-IFN/RBV in nine Brazilian healthcare centers. The study sample included 184 GEN3/CHC patients; 70 (38%) were co-infected with HIV. The overall SVR rate was 57.1% (95% CI 50-64). Among co-infected and mono-infected patients, the SVR rate was 51.4% (36/70) and 60.5% (69/114), respectively (p=0.241). Thirty-four (18.5%) patients experienced SAE and interrupted treatment. SVR was negatively associated with the use of Peg-IFN alpha 2b (PR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58-0.99; p=0.045) and to early treatment interruption due to SAE (PR 0.36; 95% CI 0.20-0.68; p=0.001). Early treatment interruption due to SAE was associated with age (PR 1.06; 95% CI 1.02-1.10; p<0.001) and occurrence of liver cirrhosis (PR 2.06; 95% CI 1.11-3.83; p=0.022). In conclusion, Peg-IFN/RBV might represent an adequate treatment option, mainly in young patients without advanced liver disease or when the use of direct-action drugs is limited to specific patient groups.

A Diacylglycerol Transferase 1 Inhibitor Is a Potent Hepatitis C Antiviral in Vitro but Not in Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant cause of liver disease affecting 80-150 million people globally. Diacylglycerol transferase 1 (DGAT-1), a triglyceride synthesis enzyme, is important for the HCV life cycle in vitro. Pradigastat, a potent DGAT-1 inhibitor found to lower triglycerides and HgbA1c in patients, was investigated for safety and efficacy in patients with HCV. This was a two-part study. In the in vitro study, the effect of pradigastat on virus production was evaluated in infected cells in culture. In the clinical study ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01387958 ), 32 patients with HCV infection were randomized to receive pradigastat or placebo (26:6) once daily for 14 days. Primary efficacy outcomes were serum viral RNA and alanine aminotransferase levels. In vitro, pradigastat significantly reduced virus production, consistent with inhibition of viral assembly and release. However, the clinical study was prematurely terminated for lack of efficacy. There was no significant change in serum viral RNA levels after dosing with pradigastat or placebo for 14 days. Pradigastat was safe and well-tolerated in this population. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal; there were no hepatic adverse events. Although pradigastat had a potent antiviral effect in vitro, no significant antiviral effect was observed in patients at predicted efficacious exposures.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infected patients

BACKGROUND

This study provides a cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic strategies for chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infected patients in Spain.

METHODS

A Markov model was designed to simulate the progression in a cohort of patients aged 50 years over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

Sofosbuvir (SOF) plus peginterferon and ribavirin for 12 weeks was a cost-effective option when compared to standard of care (SoC) in the treatment of both 'moderate fibrosis' and 'cirrhotic' patients. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €35,276/QALY and €18,374/QALY respectively. ICERs for SOF plus daclatasvir (DCV) regimens versus SoC were over the threshold limit considered, at €56,178/QALY and €77,378/QALY for 'moderate fibrosis' and 'cirrhotic' patients respectively.

CONCLUSION

Addition of SOF to IFN-based regimens for genotype 3 was cost-effective for both 'moderate fibrosis' and 'cirrhotic' patients. IFN-free options including SOF and DCV association required price reductions lower than the list prices to be considered cost-effective.

Lethal Mutagenesis of Hepatitis C Virus Induced by Favipiravir

Lethal mutagenesis is an antiviral approach that consists in extinguishing a virus by an excess of mutations acquired during replication in the presence of a mutagen. Here we show that favipiravir (T-705) is a potent mutagenic agent for hepatitis C virus (HCV) during its replication in human hepatoma cells. T-705 leads to an excess of G → A and C → U transitions in the mutant spectrum of preextinction HCV populations. Infectivity decreased significantly in the presence of concentrations of T-705 which are 2- to 8-fold lower than its cytotoxic concentration 50 (CC50). Passaging the virus five times in the presence of 400 μM T-705 resulted in virus extinction. Since T-705 has undergone advanced clinical trials for approval for human use, the results open a new approach based on lethal mutagenesis to treat hepatitis C virus infections. If proven effective for HCV in vivo, this new anti-HCV agent may be useful in patient groups that fail current therapeutic regimens.

Hepatitis C virus genotype 3: Meta-analysis on sustained virologic response rates with currently available treatment options

AIM: To address the therapeutic efficacy of various treatment regimens in genotype 3 selecting randomized clinical trials and prospective National Cohort Studies.

METHODS: (1) PEG-INF-based therapy including sofosbuvir (SOF) + RBV for 12 wk vs SOF + RBV 24 wk; (2) SOF + RBV therapy 12 wk/16 wk vs 24 wk; and (3) the role of RBV in SOF + daclatasvir (DCV) and SOF + ledipasvir (LDV) combinations. This meta-analysis provides robust information with the intention of addressing treatment strategy for hepatitis C virus genotype 3.

RESULTS: A combination treatment including SOF + RBV + PEG-IFN for 12 wk notes better SVR than with only SOF + RBV for 12 wk, although its association with more frequent adverse effects may be a limiting factor. Longer duration therapy with SOF + RBV (24 wk) has achieved higher SVR rates than shorter durations (12 or 16 wk). SOF + LDV are not an ideal treatment for genotype 3.

CONCLUSION: Lastly, SOF + DCV combination is probably the best oral therapy option and the addition of RBV does not appear to be needed to increase SVR rates substantially.

Sofosbuvir With Velpatasvir in Treatment-Naive Noncirrhotic Patients With Genotype 1 to 6 Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Effective, pangenotypic treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir with velpatasvir in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6.

DESIGN

Randomized, phase 2, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01858766).

SETTING

48 U.S. sites.

PATIENTS

377 treatment-naive noncirrhotic patients. In part A, patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6 were randomly assigned to sofosbuvir, 400 mg, with velpatasvir, 25 or 100 mg, for 12 weeks. In part B, patients with genotype 1 or 2 HCV infection were randomly assigned to sofosbuvir, 400 mg, and velpatasvir, 25 or 100 mg, with or without ribavirin for 8 weeks.

MEASUREMENTS

Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12).

RESULTS

In part A, SVR12 rates were 96% (26 of 27) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, and 100% (28 of 28) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, for genotype 1; 93% (25 of 27) in both groups for genotype 3; and 96% (22 of 23) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, and 95% (21 of 22) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, for genotypes 2, 4, 5, and 6. In part B, for genotype 1, SVR12 rates were 87% (26 of 30) with velpatasvir, 25 mg; 83% (25 of 30) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, plus ribavirin; 90% (26 of 29) with velpatasvir, 100 mg; and 81% (25 of 31) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, plus ribavirin. For genotype 2, SVR12 rates were 77% (20 of 26) with velpatasvir, 25 mg; 88% (22 of 25) with velpatasvir, 25 mg, plus ribavirin; 88% (23 of 26) with velpatasvir, 100 mg; and 88% (23 of 26) with velpatasvir, 100 mg, plus ribavirin. Adverse events included fatigue (21%), headache (20%), and nausea (12%). One patient committed suicide.

LIMITATION

The study was open-label, no inferential statistics were planned, and sample sizes were small.

CONCLUSION

Twelve weeks of sofosbuvir, 400 mg, and velpatasvir, 100 mg, was well-tolerated and resulted in high SVR in patients infected with HCV genotypes 1 to 6.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Gilead Sciences.

Sofosbuvir Plus Velpatasvir Combination Therapy for Treatment-Experienced Patients With Genotype 1 or 3 Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment options are needed for patients with genotype 1 or 3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in whom previous therapy has failed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir plus velpatasvir, with and without ribavirin, in treatment-experienced patients.

DESIGN

Randomized, phase 2, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01909804).

SETTING

58 sites in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.

PATIENTS

Treatment-experienced adults with genotype 3 HCV infection without cirrhosis (cohort 1) and with compensated cirrhosis (cohort 2) and patients with genotype 1 HCV infection that was unsuccessfully treated with a protease inhibitor with peginterferon and ribavirin (50% could have compensated cirrhosis) (cohort 3).

INTERVENTION

All patients received 12 weeks of treatment that included 400 mg of sofosbuvir once daily. Patients in each cohort were randomly assigned to 25 mg of velpatasvir once daily with or without ribavirin or 100 mg of velpatasvir once daily with or without ribavirin.

MEASUREMENTS

Proportion of patients with sustained virologic response at week 12 after treatment (SVR12).

RESULTS

In cohort 1, SVR12 rates were 85% with 25 mg of velpatasvir, 96% with 25 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin, 100% with 100 mg of velpatasvir, and 100% with 100 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin. In cohort 2, SVR12 rates were 58% with 25 mg of velpatasvir, 84% with 25 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin, 88% with 100 mg of velpatasvir, and 96% with 100 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin. In cohort 3, SVR12 rates were 100% with 25 mg of velpatasvir, 97% with 25 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin, 100% with 100 mg of velpatasvir, and 96% with 100 mg of velpatasvir plus ribavirin. The most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, and nausea.

LIMITATION

Treatment assignments were not blinded, and no inferential statistics were planned.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with 400 mg of sofosbuvir plus 100 mg of velpatasvir for 12 weeks was well-tolerated and highly effective in treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 or 3 HCV infection.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Gilead Sciences.