Recommendations by the European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency (Enpr-EMA) Working Group on preparedness of clinical trials about paediatric medicines process

Conduct of clinical trials in babies, children and young people is often hindered by issues that could have been foreseen before the trial opened; that is, some clinical trials are often underprepared. In order to identify a good approach to trial preparedness, the European Network of Paediatric Research at the European Medicines Agency formed a working group. The Working Group included representation from regulators, industry, academics, paediatric clinical research networks and parents.The Working Group consulted widely about how to prepare for paediatric clinical trials. The Group's detailed recommendations have been published (https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/other/preparedness-medicines-clinical-trials-paediatrics-recommendations-enpr-ema-working-group-trial_en.pdf).This paper is a summary of the key recommendations including the following: start early, preferably in parallel to designing the medicine's development plan and individual protocols; identify the rationale and clinical need; listen to the perspectives of children and families, and of patient advocacy groups; identify how many people will be eligible for the trial; identify the resources needed, such as clinical facilities (including play therapy) and out-of-pocket expenditure by participants and their families; use all available data to estimate what is possible; present information about preparedness in a structured way; deploy proportionate resources to support the preparation of trials.A well-prepared, well-designed trial is likely to require fewer changes during its course, be run in a shorter time frame and achieve expected objectives.

Analysis of Pediatric Drug Approval Lag in Japan

BACKGROUND

Drugs should be made available to all patients in a timely manner regardless of whether they are adults or children. In contrast to the United States (US) and the European Union (EU), no laws mandating pediatric drug development have been established in Japan. The objective of this study was to examine the current status and characteristics of pediatric drug development in Japan using information on the approval lag for pediatric indications between Japan and the EU.

METHODS

Drugs approved for pediatric indications between January 2007 and December 2018 in Japan were studied. The approval lag for pediatric indications between Japan and the EU was calculated and analyzed by approval time and the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. Factors potentially affecting the approval lag, such as orphan drug status, company nationality, and clinical data package, were examined.

RESULTS

The median approval lag for 105 drugs with pediatric indications in both Japan and the EU was 1017 days (Japan was behind). The lag for ATC category B improved significantly after 2011, and for category L after 2015; the medians were less than half a year. The lag for drugs developed globally via multi-regional clinical trials was significantly shorter compared with drugs developed regionally.

CONCLUSION

Global clinical trials are the most effective means of shortening approval lag time in pediatric drug development. Global development is making rapid progress for many adult diseases, thereby creating an environment for proactive participation in global clinical trials even for pediatric drugs. For further improvement, more active drug development for pediatric indication is recommended in tandem with the US and the EU.

Paediatric drug development: the impact of evolving regulations

Children deserve medicines that are adapted to their needs. The need to include children in drug development has been recognised increasingly over the past few decades. Legal and regulatory frameworks are well established in the EU and US. The amount of work done to study medicines for children is significantly greater than it was 10 years go. Proof-of-concept has been demonstrated for all segments of the paediatric drug development pipeline. It is now time to examine how the practice of developing medicines for children has evolved within those frameworks and to determine how that work should be generalised. This review describes the development of medicines for children and critically appraises the work that has been done within those frameworks. Significant effort is needed to realize the potential provided by the current regulatory framework. Using the work programme of the Global Research in Paediatrics (GRiP) Network of Excellence as a template we outline current work and future growing points.