Potential drug interactions associated with treatments for type 2 diabetes and its comorbidities: a clinical pharmacology review

Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Outpatient Lung Cancer Patients in a University Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Concomitant use of drugs in the same or different indications can sometimes lead to undesirable interactions. The prevalence of drug interactions is high in cancer patients. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency and clinical severity of drug interactions in outpatient lung cancer patients.

METHODS

The drugs used, kidney and liver blood analysis results of 160 outpatient lung cancer patients over the age of 18 years who received chemotherapy between October 2020 and July 2021 were evaluated. The Lexi-Interact online database was used to identify the types of clinically significant drug interactions, frequently interacting drugs, and clinical outcomes predicted by the databases.

RESULTS

The average number of drugs per patient was 4.2 ± 2.3. It was determined that there was a relationship between multidrug use and comorbidity, and the number of drugs used increased as the number of diagnoses increased. A relationship was also found between potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs), which we observed in 52.5% of the patients, and the number of drugs used and age. The most common clinically significant C- (36.9%), D- (16.9%), and X- (10.6%) type pDDIs were detected between conventional paclitaxel-hydrochlorothiazide, conventional paclitaxel-carboplatin, and ipratropium-tiotropium, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of frequently interacting drugs in outpatient lung cancer patients can lead to pDDIs. In these patients, the application of therapy by observing the drug-drug interaction may improve the quality of life.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction of losartan with glimepiride-metformin combination in rats and rabbits

OBJECTIVES:

The presence of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic renal disease, or and the prevention of these ailments in diabetics, frequently demands multiple drug treatments, increasing the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). The current study was focused on identifying possible DDIs on concomitant administration of losartan, a drug used to regulate hypertension along with a combination of glimepiride + metformin, widely used to treat diabetes mellitus. Possible pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions were observed for, following single-dose as well as multiple-dose treatment protocols in normal and alloxan-induced diabetes in albino Wistar rats and rabbits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Blood samples from surviving rats/rabbits obtained through orbital venous sinus bleeding/marginal ear vein bleeding, respectively, at predetermined intervals and put through to biochemical estimations of sugar level in the blood by Glucose oxidase/peroxidase method; insulin levels in serum using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and serum glimepiride levels using the high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Losartan, when treated as a single drug, resulted in a slight lowering of blood glucose levels in normal rats, diabetic rats and normal rabbits. Hypoglycemic activity of a combination of glimepiride + metformin was enhanced when losartan was co-administered as a single dosage schedule as well as a multiple dose schedule as indicated by a reduced blood glucose level and enhanced levels of insulin in rats as well as in rabbits. Serum glimepiride levels were also higher and pharmacokinetic parameters of glimepiride including mean residence time, C_max, T_1/2, AUMC_0-∞, AUMC_0-t, and AUC_0-∞, were significantly higher, whereas its clearance was decreased in the two regimens of losartan that was followed.

CONCLUSION:

It can therefore be concluded, that in diabetics with hypertension as a comorbidity condition, co-administration of losartan with glimepiride + metformin should be avoided or the dosage of a combination of glimepiride + metformin needs to be tittered to avoid recurrence of hypoglycemic episodes.

Interactions of clinical relevance associated with concurrent administration of prescription drug and food or medicinal plants: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

An inadequate combination of prescription drugs with food or medicinal plants could cause adverse effects in patients or produce negative therapeutic results. Therefore, this generic systematic review protocol aims to identify and synthesize the literature on clinical characteristics and safety issues of these types of pharmacological interactions occurring in children, adolescents, adults, pregnant/lactating women, and older adults.

METHODS/DESIGN

This generic protocol follows the stated guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement. A literature search will be performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library (VHL) electronic databases from 1960 till present for studies reporting clinical characteristics and safety issues associated with pharmacological interactions occurring between prescription drugs and food or medicinal plants in participants from birth-age to ≥ 65-year-old, including pregnant/lactating women. Lateral searching will be carried out in PubMed via related citation. Two reviewers will carry out an independent evaluation of eligible studies as well as the corresponding data extraction of the selected ones. Subsequently, the methodological quality evaluation of the selected articles will be completed using the corresponding Joanna Briggs Institute Checklists. Moreover, the quality of evidence will be graded according to the criteria of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. Quantitative research in humans comprising clinical trials and clinical, comparative and, observational studies will be included. The main outcomes of this protocol involve reported potential food-drug and herb-drug interactions, associated safety issues, and adverse reactions along with the generic name of the prescribed drug and the scientific name of the food and medicinal plants involved in these types of pharmacological interactions. Finally, findings extracted from the selected studies will be summarized in a narrative synthesis.

DISCUSSION

This generic systematic review protocol seeks to synthesize and critically evaluate current knowledge besides to identify any comprehension gaps in the concurrent administration of prescription drugs with food and herbs. By achieving a better understanding of this topic, this information will allow healthcare professionals to develop useful strategies to recognize, manage, and prevent these types of pharmacological interactions at different age stages, including pregnant/lactating women.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018117308.

Potential Drug-drug Interactions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients at the Neurological Intensive Care Unit

Background

Clinically relevant potential drug-drug interactions are considered preventable adverse drug reactions.

Objective

The aim of this study was to ascertain the frequency of potential drug-drug interactions in acute ischemic stroke patients and to explore factors associated with occurrence of potentially contraindicated drug-drug interactions.

Methods

This observational retrospective cohort and nested case-control study was carried out among patients treated for acute ischemic stroke at the Neurological Intensive Care Unit in the Clinical Centre Kragujevac, Serbia. The potentially drug-drug interactions for each day of hospitalization were identifi ed using Micromedex® soft ware. Based on the existence or absence of potentially contraindicated drug-drug interactions, the participants were divided into a group of cases (n=111) and the control group (n=444).

Results

A total of 696 patients were analysed. All patients had a minimum of one potential drug-drug interaction during hospitalization. The most common drugs involved in potential drug-drug interactions were aspirin (8.02%), diclofenac (7.49%) and warfarin (7.14%). The number of medications prescribed for simultaneous use during hospitalisation and the use of antipsychotics in therapy signifi cantly increased the likelihood of potentially contraindicated drug-drug interactions aft er adjustment by means of logistic regression for 1.2 and 3 times, respectively.

Conclusions

This study suggests that patients with acute ischemic stroke are frequently exposed to potential drug-drug interactions. It is essential to identify potentially drug-drug interactions in these patients as early as possible in order to prevent adverse drug reactions and ensure safe recovery. Besides, full attention should be paid when adding each new medication in therapy, particularly when a neurologist decides to prescribe antipsychotics, such as risperidone.

Drug utilization and factors associated with polypharmacy in individuals with diabetes mellitus in Minas Gerais, Brazil

The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of drugs and the factors associated with polypharmacy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in Minas Gerais. Descriptive analysis of drugs in use and logistic regression to estimate the association between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics with polypharmacy were performed. Of the 2619 respondents, 56.5% were in polypharmacy. Drugs for DM, agent in renin-angiotensin system, and diuretics are the most frequently used. Factors such as age, comorbidities and increased access to health services were associated with polypharmacy. It was observed high prevalence of polypharmacy, which requires a suitable care and better quality of drug use in this population.

Modified redox signaling in vasculature after chronic infusion of the insulin receptor antagonist, S961

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes and associated vascular complications cause substantial morbidity and mortality. It is important to investigate mechanisms and test therapies in relevant physiological models, yet few animal models adequately recapitulate all aspects of the human condition.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the potential of using an insulin receptor antagonist, S961, in mice for investigating vascular pathophysiology.

METHODS

S961 was infused into mice for 4 weeks. Blood glucose was monitored, and insulin was measured at the end of the protocol. Blood pressure and pressor responses to vasodilators were measured in cannulated mice, and vascular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species were measured in isolated tissue.

RESULTS

S961 infusion-induced hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. There was evidence of increased vascular reactive oxygen and nitrogen species and modification of NO-mediated signaling. Pressor responses to a NO donor were attenuated, but responses to bradykinin were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of S961, an insulin receptor antagonist, results in the production of a mouse model of type 2 diabetes that may be useful for investigating redox signaling in the vasculature of insulin-resistant mice over the short term. It is limited by both the transient nature of the hyperglycemia and incomplete functional analogy to the human condition.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of three SGLT-2 inhibitors sergliflozin, remogliflozin and ertugliflozin: an overview

1. Several sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are in clinical use for the management of type 2 diabetes. The objectives of the current review were: (a) to provide a comparative pharmacokinetics including absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretory (ADME) profiles of three SGLT-2 inhibitors namely: sergliflozin, remogliflozin and ertugliflozin; (b) to provide some perspectives on possible developmental issues. 2. Based on the half-life (t_1/2) values observed in humans, the rank order of the three SGLT-2 inhibitors was ertugliflozin (16 h) > remogliflozin (2-4 h) > sergliflozin (1-1.5 h). Therefore, while once a day dosing of ertugliflozin is possible, the other two drugs need to be dosed more frequently. Perhaps, the short t_1/2 of sergliflozin may have contributed for its discontinuation. 3. Although there was paucity of published data on the metabolism, transporter related and excretory aspects for sergliflozin, the other two drugs provided a differentiating profile. However, the compiled data suggested that there may be a minimal or no risk of pharmacokinetic drug interaction issues associated with any of the reviewed drugs. 4. Because of the crowded development pipeline and approved SGLT-2 inhibitors, the safety and efficacy of sergliflozin, remogliflozin and ertugliflozin appear to be a key from differentiation perspective.

Treatment intensification for patients with type 2 diabetes and poor glycaemic control

AIMS

To identify the time to and patient characteristics associated with treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and poor glycaemic control.

METHODS

Using a large US insurance claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study among adult patients with T2D and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥8% (index date) after ≥3 months of therapy including metformin. Patients were required to have continuous enrolment for at least 12 months before (baseline) and after index date, and no injectable antidiabetes medications. We defined treatment intensification as prescription fill for injectable or additional oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Cox modelling was performed to identify factors associated with time to treatment intensification.

RESULTS

For the 11 525 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, the mean age at index date was 57 years, 40% were female and the mean index HbA1c was 9.1%. Overall, 37% of patients had their treatment intensified <6 months after, 11% had their treatment intensified 6-12 months after, and 52% did not have their treatment intensified <12 months after the index date. A higher index HbA1c was associated with early intensification [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 for HbA1c ≥9 to <10% and HR 1.41 for HbA1c ≥10% compared with HbA1c ≥8 to <9%; p < 0.0001), and later line of therapy was associated with late intensification (HR 0.78 for metformin with one OAD and HR 0.68 for metformin with ≥2 OADs compared with metformin monotherapy; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer than half of patients with T2D and treatment failure received intensification within 12 months in a real-world US population. Factors associated with treatment inertia can be used to target clinical care for these patients.

Clinically and pharmacologically relevant interactions of antidiabetic drugs

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus often require multifactorial pharmacological treatment due to different comorbidities. An increasing number of concomitantly taken medications elevate the risk of the patient experiencing adverse drug effects or drug interactions. Drug interactions can be divided into pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions affecting cytochrome (CYP) enzymes, absorption properties, transporter activities and receptor affinities. Furthermore, nutrition, herbal supplements, patient's age and gender are of clinical importance. Relevant drug interactions are predominantly related to sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones and glinides. Although metformin has a very low interaction potential, caution is advised when drugs that impair renal function are used concomitantly. With the exception of saxagliptin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors also show a low interaction potential, but all drugs affecting the drug transporter P-glycoprotein should be used with caution. Incretin mimetics and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors comprise a very low interaction potential and are therefore recommended as an ideal combination partner from the clinical-pharmacologic point of view.

Application of clinical judgment and guidelines to achieving glycemic goals in type 2 diabetes: focus on pharmacologic therapy

Successful management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus requires attention to 4 pillars of care: diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and pharmacologic therapy. For pharmacologic therapy, the availability of multiple drugs in different classes can make choices regarding initiation and intensification of treatment challenging. This article, focusing on clinical practice, reviews and provides guidance on assessing recommendations made by the latest diabetes guidelines for pharmacotherapy published by the American Diabetes Association and the American Academy of Clinical Endocrinologists. The article discusses how diabetes guidelines evolved, their move toward personalization of therapy, and their effective use in clinical practice. An appraisal of various pharmacologic strategies is integrated with the author's approach to achieving glycemic goals with a minimum of weight gain or hypoglycemic episodes. Using patients' baseline glycated hemoglobin levels and the degree to which their fasting and postprandial plasma levels contribute to their hyperglycemia is explained as a strategy by which drugs can be chosen that act on these parameters. Lifestyle interventions such as diet and exercise should continue to form the foundation of the therapeutic alliance between the clinician and patient as pharmacologic therapy is initiated or intensified.

Dapagliflozin added to usual care in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus with preexisting cardiovascular disease: a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a 28-week extension

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, for the treatment of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and preexisting cardiovascular disease (CVD).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, age-stratified (<65 and ≥ 65), 24-week clinical trial with a 28-week extension.

SETTING

One hundred seventy-three centers in 10 countries.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals (N = 964) with T2DM, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0% to 10.0%, and documented CVD.

INTERVENTION

Dapagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo was added to usual care. Participants receiving insulin had their total daily insulin dose reduced by 25% at randomization.

MEASUREMENTS

Two equal primary end points: change from baseline in HbA1c and proportion of participants achieving a three-item end point (reduction of ≥ 0.5% in HbA1c, ≥ 3% in body weight, and ≥ 3 mmHg in systolic blood pressure) at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-seven percent were aged 65 and older, 7.7% were aged 75 and older, mean duration of T2DM was 13 years, mean baseline HbA1c was 8.1%, and approximately 60% were taking insulin. The placebo-corrected change in HbA1c with dapagliflozin was -0.4% at 24 weeks. Significantly more participants achieved the three-item end point with dapagliflozin (10.0%) than with placebo (1.9%). The placebo-corrected percentage change in body weight for dapagliflozin was -1.9% (-1.8 kg). Similar results were observed in both age strata, and changes were maintained over 52 weeks. More than one-quarter (28.2%) of participants receiving dapagliflozin and 25.3% of those receiving placebo experienced hypoglycemia. More participants receiving dapagliflozin had vulvovaginitis, balanitis, or urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSION

When added to a usual background regimen in an older population with advanced T2DM and preexisting comorbid CVD, dapagliflozin improved glycemic control without an increase in hypoglycemic risk, promoted weight loss, and was well tolerated.