Cytomegalovirus infection risk with alemtuzumab therapy in hematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study in the non-transplant setting

Alemtuzumab is a potent lymphocyte-depleting immunotherapy used in solid organ transplan-tation (SOT), that is increasingly being applied in diverse lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). However, a significant toxicity limiting expanded usage is cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, for which standardized preventive strategies exist in SOT but not in LPDs due to a poor understanding of infection risk in this population, with early LPD studies largely limited to stem cell transplantation. Using one of the most diverse arrays of LPDs studied to date, our retrospective cohort study of non-transplant patients receiving alemtuzumab over a ten-year period at a large regional cancer center examines the incidence and clinical profile of infected patients. Among 24 patients, we identified a composite CMV infection rate of 42% with a symptomatic rate of 21%. We also noted significant variations in preventive strategies, which alongside a high infection rate presents an opportunity to improve outcomes through further work in standardization.

Vaccinations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is characterized by immune dysfunction resulting in heightened susceptibility to infections and elevated rates of morbidity and mortality. A key strategy to mitigate infection-related complications has been immunization against common pathogens. However, the immunocompromised status of CLL patients poses challenges in eliciting an adequate humoral and cellular immune response to vaccination. Most CLL-directed therapy disproportionately impairs humoral immunity. Vaccine responsiveness also depends on the phase and type of immune response triggered by immunization. In this review, we discuss the immune dysfunction, vaccine responsiveness, and considerations for optimizing vaccine response in patients with CLL.

Recommendations on prevention of infections in patients with T-cell lymphomas: a narrative review and synthesis

T/Natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas (TCL) represent a heterogenous subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, associated with poorer prognosis and higher treatment toxicity. A cohesive synthesis of infection outcomes among TCL patients is lacking. International guidelines offer no specific recommendations regarding prophylaxis or supportive infection care for TCL patients. This systematic narrative review highlights infection outcomes in TCL patients treated with conventional, and novel therapies. Recommendations for infection screening, antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies are outined.

Cytomegalovirus DNAemia and disease: current-era epidemiology, clinical characteristics and outcomes in cancer patients other than allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-intensity chemotherapy and advances in novel immunotherapies have seen the emergence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in cancer patients other than allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We therefore aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of CMV infection in this population.

METHOD

A retrospective review of cancer patients other than allogeneic HCT who had CMV DNAemia and/or disease from July 2013 till May 2020 at a quaternary cancer center was performed.

RESULTS

Of 11,485 cancer patients who underwent treatment during this period, 953 patients had CMV DNA testing performed and 238 of them had CMV DNAemia. After excluding patients with allogeneic HCT, 62 patients with CMV DNAemia were identified of which 10 had concurrent CMV disease. The most frequent underlying malignancies were B-cell lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) (31%, 19/62), T-cell LPD (21%, 13/62), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (11%, 7/62), and multiple myeloma (10%, 6/62). Most patients had lymphopenia (77%, 48/62), multiple cancer therapies (63%, 39/62 received ≥2 previous therapies), co-infection (56%, 35/62 had ≥1 co-infection) and corticosteroid therapy (48%, 30/62) within one month before CMV diagnosis. CMV DNAemia and disease were observed in patients receiving novel immunotherapies including bispecific antibody therapy, chimeric-antigen receptor T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Patients with haematological malignancy, particularly B-cell LPD, T-cell LPD, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and multiple myeloma were frequently identified to have CMV DNAemia and disease. Lymphopenia, multiple cancer therapies, co-infection, and recent receipt of systemic corticosteroids were also commonly observed. Future studies are necessary to determine optimal identification and management of CMV in these patients. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of lymphoma

The recent development and clinical implementation of novel immunotherapies for the treatment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma have improved patient outcomes across subgroups. The rapid introduction of immunotherapeutic agents into the clinic, however, has presented significant questions regarding optimal treatment scheduling around existing chemotherapy/radiation options, as well as a need for improved understanding of how to properly manage patients and recognize toxicities. To address these challenges, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts in lymphoma to develop a clinical practice guideline for the education of healthcare professionals on various aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment. The panel discussed subjects including treatment scheduling, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the integration of immunotherapy and stem cell transplant to form recommendations to guide healthcare professionals treating patients with lymphoma.

Incidence and Predictive Risk Factors of Infective Events in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Agents Targeting CD20 and CD52 Surface Antigens

OBJECTIVE

Monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the CD20 and CD52 antigens are used increasingly in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Several life-threatening opportunistic infections have been reported in postmarketing case series. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of infections and associated prognostic factors during the first year of treatment in patients receiving anti-CD20 (ocrelizumab or rituximab) or anti-CD52 MAbs (alemtuzumab).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in patients with MS referring to the Neurodegenerative Diseases Center at the University of Naples Federico II who received MAbs between November 2015 and June 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were enrolled. Approximately 40% of patients experienced lymphocytopenia during treatment. Eighty-six infective events were reported in 67 patients (41%). Bacterial infections were significantly more frequent with anti-CD20, whereas viral infections prevailed with alemtuzumab. Cytomegalovirus reactivation rates were significantly higher in the alemtuzumab group than in patients on anti-CD20 (51% vs 6%, P < .001). The overall annualized infection rate was 1.1 per patient-year, higher in patients on anti-CD52 versus those on anti-CD20 regimens (1.5 vs 0.8 per patient-year). Alemtuzumab treatment, prior exposure to ≥2 MS drugs, and iatrogenic immune impairment significantly and independently predicted an infection event (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.7; P = .013; aHR, 1.7; P = .052; and aHR, 2.9; P = .004; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Given their considerable infection risk, MS patients receiving MAbs should undergo timely follow up and tailored preventive interventions. Anti-CD52-based treatment, prior exposure to MS drugs, and on-treatment immune impairment are significant predictive factors of infection and their evaluation could help clinicians to stratify a patient's risk of infection.

EBV-PTLD, Adenovirus, and CMV in Pediatric Allogeneic Transplants With Alemtuzumab as Part of Pretransplant Conditioning: A Retrospective Single Center Study

The risk of viral infections and reactivation occurring in the setting of pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a concern in the pediatric patient, especially with the use of Alemtuzumab (Campath) as a conditioning agent. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of Epstein-Barr virus posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and adenovirus among pediatric recipients of alemtuzumab at our institution. We found that EBV-PTLD occurred in 2.1% of transplants (1 matched unrelated donor [MUD] recipient), CMV reactivation occurred in 12.5% of transplants (4 MUD and 2 matched related donor [MRD] recipients) with disseminated CMV in 2.1% of cases (1 MRD recipient), and adenovirus infection occurred in 8.3% of the total transplants (2 MUD and 2 MRD recipients). Alemtuzumab continues to be used as a method of graft-versus-host disease and graft failure prevention among pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and seems to be safer than previously reported. At our institution, alemtuzumab has not increased the risk for EBV-PTLD, CMV infection, or adenovirus.

[National guidelines for the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Sociedad Espan˜ola de Hematologı´a y Hemoterapia and Grupo Espan˜ol de Leucemia Linfocı´tica Cro´ nica]

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia is the most common chronic lymphoproliferative disorder in Spain. The clinical management of this entity varies widely. Currently, in Spain, there are no national consensus guidelines, such as those published in other countries, to guide the diagnosis and treatment of this malignancy and the use of prognostic scores. This article reviews the current scientific literature and addresses issues on the diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the spread of the disease, the presence of comorbidities, the classification of prognostic scores, the common treatment regimens stratified by risk factors, and the management of complications associated with both the disease and its treatment, as well as the various controversies related to this entity. This document was drafted with the collaboration of national experts and aims to establish practical guidelines with their corresponding levels of evidence and grades of recommendation to guide the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Alemtuzumab use in relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a history and discussion of future rational use

In this review, we outline the clinical experience with single-agent alemtuzumab as a treatment for relapsed and refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in both prospective and retrospective trials and describe the multiagent use of the drug with the goal of updating clinicians on recent developments and possible future rational combinations. Alemtuzumab, an antibody targeting the lymphocyte-specific surface marker CD52, is an approved agent for the treatment of CLL. Despite its demonstrated efficacy, likely secondary to concerns regarding infectious complications, it is most commonly used in the relapsed and refractory setting. Given alemtuzumab's unique mechanism of action it has been demonstrated to have activity in disease that is refractory to both alkylating agents and purine analogs. Furthermore, it has activity in TP53-mutated disease, which has the worst prognosis of any subset of CLL. Alemtuzumab has greater efficacy on circulating disease relative to nodal disease. Rational combinations are attempting to use these attributes to increase response rates in patients with relapsed and refractory disease.

Measuring T-cell responses against LCV and CMV in cynomolgus macaques using ELISPOT: potential application to non-clinical testing of immunomodulatory therapeutics

A number of immunomodulatory therapeutics increase the risk of disease associated with latent herpesviruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a member of the lymphocryptovirus (LCV) family that infects humans. The diseases associated with loss of immunity to these viruses can have major impacts on patients as well as on the commercial viability of the immunomodulatory therapeutics. In an effort to develop non-clinical methods for measuring effects on anti-viral immunity, we have developed an interferon (IFN)-γ enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay to quantify the number of CMV or LCV-reactive T-cells in peripheral blood of cynomolgus macaques. After optimization of various parameters, the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was characterized for specificity, intra-assay, monkey-to-monkey, and longitudinal variability and sensitivity to immunosuppression. The results show that nearly all animals have detectable responses against both CMV and LCV and responses were derived from T-cells specific to the virus of interest. Analyses of variability show assay reproducibility (≤23% CV), and that variability over time in anti-viral responses in individual animals (larger for LCV than for CMV) was ∼2-fold in most animals over a 3-month time period, which is predicted to allow for detection of drug-induced changes when using group sizes typical of non-clinical studies. In addition, the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was capable of detecting decreases in the numbers of CMV and LCV reactive T-cells induced by immunosuppressive drugs in vitro. This assay may allow for non-clinical assessment of the effects of immunomodulatory therapeutics on anti-viral T-cell immunity in monkeys, and may help determine if therapeutics increase the risk of reactivating latent viral infections.

Immunosuppressive monoclonal antibodies: current and next generation

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are well-established therapeutics, as evidenced by the large number of Food and Drug Administration-approved mAbs for the treatment of cancers, and inflammatory or autoimmune diseases, and for the prevention and treatment of solid organ transplant rejection. Although, in many cases, mAbs have improved patient survival, they are also associated with an increased incidence of opportunistic infections. We review here the current and next generation of mAbs and the risks that infectious disease specialists should be aware of.