Periprocedural antithrombotic strategies in acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Have we discarded bivalirudin too soon?

BACKGROUND

Publication of the BRIGHT-4 trial results has restimulated discussion about the optimal periprocedural antithrombotic strategy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It is possible that variation in the infusion duration, may contribute to observed differences in safety-efficacy profiles of bivalirudin in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Up to December 2022, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin (either administered peri-procedurally or accompanied by postprocedural infusion) and heparin, both with or without GPI, were searched and entered in a frequentist network meta-analysis. Co-primary endpoints were trial-defined major adverse composite events (MACE) and major bleeding. Incident rate ratios (IRR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were estimated.

RESULTS

10 RCTs (N = 57,137 patients/month) were included. As compared to heparin, prolonged bivalirudin infusion resulted in lower rates of major bleeding (IRR 0.58, 95 % CI 0.36-0.91), but there was no differences in MACE rates between these strategies. With regard to NACE, prolonged bivalirudin infusion yielded lower risk (IRR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.77-0.96), whereas both bivalirudin and heparin increased risk when coupled with GPI (IRR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.01-1.51 and IRR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.06-1.44, respectively). Both these combination strategies also increased minor bleeding rates (IRR 1.49, 95 % CI 1.16-1.93 and IRR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.29-1.95, respectively, for bivalirudin and heparin). Results were consistent across several sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, procedural bivalirudin administration followed by prolonged infusion results in lower major bleeding rates, but there does not appear to be a difference in observed MACE.

Update on Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients with ECMO-A Narrative Review

The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has recently increased exponentially. ECMO has become the preferred mode of organ support in refractory respiratory or circulatory failure. The fragile balance of haemostasis physiology is massively altered by the patient's critical condition and specifically the aetiology of the underlying disease. Furthermore, an application of ECMO conveys another disturbance of haemostasis due to blood-circuit interaction and the presence of an oxygenator. The purpose of this review is to summarise current knowledge on the anticoagulation management in patients undergoing ECMO therapy. The unfractionated heparin modality with monitoring of activated partial thromboplastin tests is considered to be a gold standard for anticoagulation in this specific subgroup of intensive care patients. However, alternative modalities with other agents are comprehensively discussed. Furthermore, other ways of monitoring can represent the actual state of coagulation in a more complex fashion, such as thromboelastometric/graphic methods, and might become more frequent. In conclusion, the coagulation system of patients with ECMO is altered by multiple variables, and there is a significant lack of evidence in this area. Therefore, a highly individualised approach is the best solution today.

Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin in adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation anticoagulant therapy: A retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

There were controversial opinions on the use of bivalirudin versus heparin for anticoagulant therapy in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The aim of our present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin for the maintenance of systemic anticoagulation during adult veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO).

METHODS

Adult patients who received V-V ECMO support in our center between February 2018and February 2022 were retrospectively recruited. We analyzed their ECMO support time, platelet count, coagulation indicators, blood product infusion volume, the incidence of thrombosis and bleeding, probability of successful weaning of ECMO, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients received V-V ECMO support. Thirty-four patients were finally included according to the exclusion and inclusion criteria, 14 and 20 accepted bivalirudin and heparin for anticoagulant therapy, respectively. The Minimum platelet value (98.50 × 10⁹/L (85.50, 123.75) vs 49.50 × 10⁹/L (31.25, 83.00), p = 0.002) and mean platelet value (149.90 × 10⁹/L (127.40, 164.80) vs 74.55 × 10⁹/L (62.45, 131.60), p = 0.03) and the ratio of successful weaning of ECMO (92.8% vs 60.0%, p = 0.033) in bivalirudin group were significantly higher than those in heparin group. The red blood cell infusion volume (7.00 U (3.00, 13.25) vs 13.75 U (7.25, 22.63), p = 0.039), platelet infusion volume (0.00 mL (0.00, 75.00) vs 300 mL (0.00, 825.00), p = 0.027), and the incidence of major bleeding (0.00% vs 30%, p = 0.024) in bivalirudin group were significantly lower than those in heparin group.

CONCLUSIONS

In V-V ECMO-supported adult patients, systemic anticoagulation with bivalirudin has achieved the same anticoagulation targets as heparin with less frequency of major bleeding events and lower requirement for blood products without significantly increased risk of thrombosis. Bivalirudin most likely is a safe and effective anticoagulation method for adult patients supported by V-V ECMO.

A Historical Perspective on the Reversal of Anticoagulants

There has been a landmark shift in the last several decades in the management and prevention of thromboembolic events. From the discovery of parenteral and oral agents requiring frequent monitoring as early as 1914, to the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that do not require monitoring or dose adjustment in the late 20th century, great advances have been achieved. Despite the advent of these newer agents, bleeding continues to be a key complication, affecting 2 to 4% of DOAC-treated patients per year. Bleeding is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although specific reversal agents for DOACs have lagged the release of these agents, idarucizumab and andexanet alfa are now available as antagonists. However, the efficacy of these reversal agents is uncertain, and complications, including thrombosis, have not been adequately explored. As such, guidelines continue to advise the use of nonspecific prohemostatic agents for patients requiring reversal of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs. As the indications for DOACs and the overall prevalence of their use expand, there is an unmet need for further studies to determine the efficacy of specific compared with nonspecific pro-hemostatic reversal agents. In this review, we will discuss the evidence behind specific and nonspecific reversal agents for both parenteral and oral anticoagulants.

Anticoagulation Strategies during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Narrative Review

The development of extracorporeal life support technology has added a new dimension to the care of critically ill patients who fail conventional treatment options. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)—specialized temporary life support for patients with severe cardiac or pulmonary failure—plays a role in bridging the time for organ recovery, transplant, or permanent assistance. The overall patient outcome is dependent on the underlying disease, comorbidities, patient reaction to critical illness, and potential adverse events during ECMO. Moreover, the contact of the blood with the large artificial surface of an extracorporeal system circuit triggers complex inflammatory and coagulation responses. These processes may further lead to endothelial injury and disrupted microcirculation with consequent end-organ dysfunction and the development of adverse events like thromboembolism. Therefore, systemic anticoagulation is considered crucial to alleviate the risk of thrombosis and failure of ECMO circuit components. The gold standard and most used anticoagulant during extracorporeal life support is unfractionated heparin, with all its benefits and disadvantages. However, therapeutic anticoagulation of a critically ill patient carries the risk of clinically relevant bleeding with the potential for permanent injury or death. Similarly, thrombotic events may occur. Therefore, different anticoagulation strategies are employed, while the monitoring and the balance of procoagulant and anticoagulatory factors is of immense importance. This narrative review summarizes the most recent considerations on anticoagulation during ECMO support, with a special focus on anticoagulation monitoring and future directions.

Time in Therapeutic Range for Bivalirudin Among Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Given the adverse event rates involving bleeding and thrombosis among children on ventricular assist devices (VADs), anticoagulant management has become a focal point for quality improvement and innovation. There may be advantages to using direct thrombin inhibitors, such as bivalirudin, though this has not been fully explored. As the percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) for anticoagulants is classically associated with improved clinical outcomes, we evaluated the %TTR for bivalirudin among pediatric VAD recipients. Using a modification of the Rosendaal method, %TTR was calculated using activated partial thromboplastin time measurements for 11 VAD recipients in the early postoperative period (postoperative days 0-14) and for the duration of VAD support. In the initial 2 weeks after VAD implant, mean %TTR was 68.7 (±13.0). During the entire support course, the mean %TTR improved to 79.6 (±11.0). There was an era effect with improving %TTR in the latter half of the study period. We report very good %TTR for bivalirudin both in the first 2 weeks post implant and this improved over the duration of support. Because %TTR reflects the degree of safety and efficacy in chronic anticoagulation, this relatively high %TTR among a diverse, often critically ill cohort suggests that bivalirudin may be a promising agent. Although this study was underpowered to comprehensively evaluate adverse events on bivalirudin, this represents an important next step for larger scale study.

The efficacy and safety of Hirudin plus Aspirin versus Warfarin in the secondary prevention of Cardioembolic Stroke due to Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Background: To investigate the efficacy and safety of hirudin plus aspirin therapy compared with warfarin in the secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods: Patients with cardioembolic stroke due to NVAF were prospectively enrolled from 18 collaborating hospitals from Dec 2011 to June 2015. Fourteen days after stroke onset, eligible patients were assigned to the hirudin plus aspirin group (natural hirudin prescribed as the traditional Chinese medicine Maixuekang capsule, 0.75 g, three times daily, combined with aspirin 100 mg, once daily) or the warfarin group (dose-adjusted warfarin targeting international normalized ratio (INR) 2-3, with an initial daily dose of 1.25 mg). Patients were followed up at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after stroke onset. Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated according to Rosendaal methodology to evaluate the quality of INR management in the warfarin group. The primary efficacy endpoint was the recurrence of stroke within 12 months after stroke onset. Safety was assessed as the occurrence of the composite event "intracranial hemorrhage and other bleeding events, death, and other serious adverse events". The Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to analyze the efficacy and safety events. Results: A total of 221 patients entered final analysis with 112 patients in the hirudin plus aspirin group and 109 in the warfarin group. Over the whole duration of our study, TTR for patients taking warfarin was 66.5 % ± 21.5%. A significant difference was not observed in the recurrence of stroke between the two groups (3.57% vs. 2.75%; P = 0.728). The occurrence of safety events was significantly lower in the hirudin plus aspirin group (2.68% vs.10.09%; P = 0.024). The risk for efficacy event was similar between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR), 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-5.80). The safety risk was significantly lower in the hirudin plus aspirin group (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.07-0.95). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significant difference in the temporal distribution in safety events (P = 0.023) but not in stroke recurrence (P = 0.726). Conclusion: Significant difference in efficacy was not detected between warfarin group and hirudin plus aspirin group. Compared with warfarin, hirudin plus aspirin therapy had lower safety risk in the secondary prevention of cardioembolic stroke due to NVAF.

Impella 5.0 supported oncological surgery as bridge to LVAD

We describe the case of a 58‐year‐old man presenting with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, treated with Impella CP which was escalated to an axillary 5.0 due to lack of cardiac recovery. Weaning from Impella 5.0 failed, and the patient was evaluated for heart transplantation (HTx) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD). HTx was excluded because of a rectal adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent colorectal surgery while on Impella. Perioperative course was uneventful. After 61 days of Impella, when the LVAD implantation was scheduled, the patient died due to K. pneumoniae infection.

Novel Use of Cangrelor With Heparin During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Cardiovascular Surgery: A Case Series

Optimal anticoagulation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains uncertain in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who require urgent/emergent cardiac surgery. We describe our strategy and experience with utilizing cangrelor in combination with heparin for anticoagulation during CPB in patients with different phases of HIT undergoing a wide range of urgent/emergent cardiovascular surgery. Cangrelor is an intravenous direct-acting P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist that achieves therapeutic effect and eliminates rapidly. Its antiplatelet activity is unaffected by stagnation of blood, nor is it influenced by patient's sex, age, renal status, or hepatic function. Our institutional alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy for HIT patients is to administer cangrelor with a loading dose of 30 μg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 4 μg/kg/min throughout CPB via a dedicated intravenous access. VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit point-of-care assay is utilized to monitor platelet inhibition throughout surgery. Cangrelor infusion is discontinued 10 minutes prior to heparin reversal with protamine. Ten urgent/emergent cardiovascular surgeries were performed at our institution using cangrelor with heparin for anticoagulation during CPB, and the majority were pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (60%). HIT was confirmed in 3 cases and was suspected in 4 which was found to be negative after the operation. One case of subacute B HIT and 2 cases of remote HIT were included in this series. This novel alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy was well tolerated by all patients. There was neither serious postoperative thrombotic event nor major postoperative bleeding complication that required reoperation. One death occurred in a patient with advanced intracardiac malignancy, whose life support was ultimately withdrawn postoperatively. Median postoperative intensive care unit stay was 7.2 ± 5.5 days, while median postoperative hospital stay was 16.3 ± 10.8 days. In patients with various phases of HIT who require urgent/emergent on-pump cardiovascular surgery, the use of cangrelor with heparin may be a convenient, safe, and effective alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy providing acceptable outcomes.

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

INTRODUCTION

Bivalirudin and heparin are the two most commonly used anticoagulants used during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). The results of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) comparing bivalirudin versus heparin monotherapy in the era of radial access are controversial, questioning the positive impact of bivalirudin on bleeding. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the results of RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin with or without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (GPI).

METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses PRISMA statements for reporting systematic reviews. We searched the National Library of Medicine PubMed, Clinicaltrial.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to include clinical studies comparing bivalirudin with heparin in patients undergoing PCI. Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed for the summary.

FINDINGS

Several RCTs and meta-analyses have demonstrated the superiority of bivalirudin over heparin plus routine GPI use in terms of preventing bleeding complications but at the expense of increased risk of ischemic complications such as stent thrombosis. The hypothesis of post- PCI bivalirudin infusion to mitigate the risk of acute stent thrombosis has been tested in various RCTs with conflicting results. In comparison, heparin offers the advantage of having a reversible agent, of lower cost and reduced incidence of ischemic complications.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin demonstrates its superiority over heparin plus GPI with better clinical outcomes in terms of less bleeding complications, thus making it as anticoagulation of choice particularly in patients at high risk of bleeding. Further studies are warranted for head to head comparison of bivalirudin to heparin monotherapy to establish an optimal heparin dosing regimen and post-PCI bivalirudin infusion to affirm its beneficial effect in reducing acute stent thrombosis.

Pharmacokinetics of Toxin-Derived Peptide Drugs

Toxins and venoms produced by different organisms contain peptides that have evolved to have highly selective and potent pharmacological effects on specific targets for protection and predation. Several toxin-derived peptides have become drugs and are used for the management of diabetes, hypertension, chronic pain, and other medical conditions. Despite the similarity in their composition (amino acids as the building blocks), toxin-derived peptide drugs have very profound differences in their structure and conformation, in their physicochemical properties (that affect solubility, stability, etc.), and subsequently in their pharmacokinetics (the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination following their administration to patients). This review summarizes and critically analyzes the pharmacokinetic properties of toxin-derived peptide drugs: (1) the relationship between the chemical structure, physicochemical properties, and the pharmacokinetics of the specific drugs, (2) the major pharmacokinetic properties and parameters of these drugs, and (3) the major pharmacokinetic variability factors of the individual drugs. The structural properties of toxin-derived peptides affect their pharmacokinetics and pose some limitations on their clinical use. These properties should be taken into account during the development of new toxin-derived peptide drugs, and for the efficient and safe use of the clinically approved drugs from this group in the individual patients.

Hirudin variants production by genetic engineered microbial factory

Hirudin was discovered as an active anticoagulant in leech extracts almost 60 years ago. Since their initial discovery, hirudin and its variants have been produced with various anti-thrombotic, cancer cell inhibition, diabetic cataract treatment and anti-fatigue activities. Some hirudin variants have been approved for clinical use and released into the marketplace. Recent progress has seen made in relation to hirudin variants expressed in several well-established microbial hosts, including Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris and others, with high levels of activity and yield. This review summarizes the current progress on hirudin production using microbial producers, and considers the outlook for future development.

Evaluation of Bivalirudin’s Effect on International Normalized Ratio to Determine an Appropriate Strategy for Transitioning to Warfarin

Background: Direct thrombin inhibitors are recommended in confirmed or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. False elevation of the international normalized ratio (INR) occurs with these agents making bridging to warfarin challenging. There is limited data regarding bivalirudin’s effect on INR. Objective: To evaluate bivalirudin’s effect on the INR and determine a strategy for transitioning to warfarin. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study. Included patients were >18 years old receiving primary bridging therapy with overlapping bivalirudin and warfarin for at least 72 hours. Patients with administration of alternate anticoagulants during the transition interval or active major bleeding within 48 hours prior to bivalirudin initiation were excluded. The primary endpoint was to determine the effect on INR at first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time after bivalirudin initiation and prior to warfarin initiation. Secondary endpoints included change in INR 12 and 24 hours after bivalirudin initiation, change in INR 4 hours after bivalirudin cessation, and incidence of major bleeding or new thrombotic events. Results: Thirty-four patients met study criteria. For the primary endpoint, the change in INR at first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time was 0.37 (range = 0.28-0.48), which occurred at 8.4 hours (range = 4.6-14.2; n = 14). INR increased at 12 and 24 hours by a median of 0.55 and 0.5 from baseline, respectively. Median change in INR 4 to 8 hours post-bivalirudin cessation was −0.48. Conclusion: Targeting an INR > 2.5 when bridging to warfarin will account for this false elevation and maintain an INR above 2.0 on bivalirudin discontinuation.

Effect of postprocedural full-dose infusion of bivalirudin on acute stent thrombosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Outcomes in a large real-world population

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of prolonged full-dose bivalirudin infusion in real-world population with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

BACKGROUND

Subgroup data as well as meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials have shown the potency of postprocedural full-dose infusion (1.75 mg/kg/h) of bivalirudin on attenuating acute stent thrombosis (ST) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective observational study, 2047 consecutive STEMI patients treated with bivalirudin during primary PCI were enrolled in 65 Chinese centers between July 2013 and May 2016. The primary outcome was acute ST defined as ARC definite/probable within 24 hours after the index procedure, and the secondary endpoints included total ST, major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACCE, defined as death, reinfarction, stroke, and target vessel revascularization), and any bleeding at 30 days.

RESULTS

Among 2047 STEMI patients, 1123 (54.9%) were treated with postprocedural bivalirudin full-dose infusion (median 120 minutes) while the other 924 (45.1%) received low-dose (0.25 mg/kg/h) or null postprocedural infusion. A total of three acute ST (0.3%) occurred in STEMI patients with none or low-dose prolonged infusion of bivalirudin, but none was observed in those treated with post-PCI full-dose infusion (0.3% vs 0.0%, P=.092). Outcomes on MACCE (2.1% vs 2.7%, P=.402) and total bleeding (2.1% vs 1.4%, P=.217) at 30 days showed no significant difference between the two groups, and no subacute ST was observed.

CONCLUSION

Post-PCI full-dose bivalirudin infusion is safe and has a trend to protect against acute ST in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI in real-world settings.

A novel stearic acid-modified hirudin peptidomimetic with improved pharmacokinetic properties and anticoagulant activity

A novel hirudin isoform 3 mimetic peptide, named peptide S2, has been prepared by introduction of a stearic acid modification. Peptide S2 exhibited superior inhibitory activity to hirulog-1 (Bivariludin) and showed significantly higher anticoagulant potency in vivo. Peptide S2 elevated the thrombin time, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time of rat and human plasma more efficiently than hirulog-1 and the unmodified form of peptide S2 (peptide 1). Furthermore, peptide S2 inhibited arterial thrombosis and inferior vena cava in rat model 8 h after administration, and was 10-fold more potent than hirulog-1 300 min after administration of 0.1 μmol/kg peptide. The enhanced antithrombotic activity could be attributed to its long half-life (T_1/2 = 212.2 ± 58.4 min), which was 13.1 and 14.7-fold longer than those of hirulog-1 (T_1/2 = 15.1 ± 1.3 min) and peptide 1 (T_1/2 = 13.5 ± 2.6 min), respectively. Further enzymatic degradation and binding assay with human serum albumin (HSA) demonstrated that the longer duration time should be originated from the slowing of trypsin or thrombin–mediated degradation, as well as its binding to HSA. The improved pharmacokinetic properties observed for peptide S2 has made it a promising therapeutic agent for the treatment of thrombi-related diseases.

Anticoagulation management associated with extracorporeal circulation

The use of extracorporeal circulation requires anticoagulation to maintain blood fluidity throughout the circuit, and to prevent thrombotic complications. Additionally, adequate suppression of hemostatic activation avoids the unnecessary consumption of coagulation factors caused by the contact of blood with foreign surfaces. Cardiopulmonary bypass represents the greatest challenge in this regard, necessitating profound levels of anticoagulation during its conduct, but also quick, efficient reversal of this state once the surgical procedure is completed. Although extracorporeal circulation has been around for more than half a century, many questions remain regarding how to best achieve anticoagulation for it. Although unfractionated heparin is the predominant agent used for cardiopulmonary bypass, the amount required and how best to monitor its effects are still unresolved. This review discusses the use of heparin, novel anticoagulants, and the monitoring of anticoagulation during the conduct of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Anticoagulation in patients with impaired renal function and with haemodialysis. Anticoagulant effects, efficacy, safety, therapeutic options

Patients with impaired renal function are exposed to an increased risk for bleeding complications depending on the amount of the anticoagulant eliminated by the kidneys. The elimination of unfractionated heparins, vitamin K antagonists and argatroban is only minimally influenced by a reduced renal function. Low-molecular weight heparins, fondaparinux, danaparoid, hirudins and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) cause a variably increased bleeding risk in renal impairment. Dose reductions are recommended for all of these anticoagulants in renal impairment, some are even contraindicated at certain levels of renal impairment. Their benefit over the conventional anticoagulants is preserved if renal dosing is employed. For end-stage renal disease patients specific treatment regimens are required.

Pathology consultation on monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors and overcoming their effects in bleeding patients

OBJECTIVES

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), a relatively new class of anticoagulants, present several challenges regarding monitoring of their anticoagulant effects and overcoming bleeding associated with their use. The aim of this article is to (1) briefly present the pharmacologic properties of currently available DTIs, (2) discuss approaches to laboratory assessment of these drugs, and (3) review management of bleeding associated with their use.

METHODS

Published literature on DTIs, including clinical trials, case reports, and experimental animal models, was reviewed. The primary authors also reviewed their first-hand experiences with DTI anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Based on the literature review and the practical experiences of the authors, suggestions for the monitoring of DTIs and algorithmic approaches for the management of DTI-associated bleeding were developed.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine coagulation assays (eg, the prothrombin time) show a relatively poor correlation with the degree of anticoagulation and DTI drug concentrations. Newer assays, such as the ecarin clotting time and dilute thrombin time, may be more useful in assessing DTI anticoagulation, but these assays are not yet widely available. Low-grade DTI-associated bleeds are best managed with cessation of the drug and supportive care, while higher-grade and/or life-threatening bleeds may best be reversed by active drug removal (eg, via the administration of activated charcoal or hemodialysis). At present there is little evidence to suggest that transfusion products such as factor concentrates or thawed plasma are of any particular benefit in DTI reversal; however, these products may play a supportive role in the management of bleeding.

What is the optimal antithrombotic strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Major bleeding in the setting of acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention has been associated with increased short-term and long-term risk for adverse cardiac events and mortality. Recent studies on antithrombotic agents in this setting have highlighted their differential impact on ischemic and hemorrhagic complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

To measure bleeding events consistently, an updated standardized definition has been developed by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) representatives. Additionally, the antithrombin agent bivalirudin has emerged as a frontrunner in the invasive management of acute coronary syndromes because of fewer bleeding complications, lower long-term mortality, and similar efficacy compared with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The mortality benefit with bivalirudin is most likely correlated with reductions in major bleeding, including in-hospital, access-site, and nonaccess site bleeding, and despite the use of preprocedural unfractionated heparin.

SUMMARY

The BARC definition is an improved version of prior bleeding classifications, and will likely play a significant role in comparing different anticoagulation strategies in future clinical trials and registry analyses. Bivalirudin has been shown to reduce bleeding events in a multitude of diverse clinical settings and bleeding definitions, and has become the preferred antithrombotic agent in the setting of acute coronary syndromes.

Update in hematology: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bivalirudin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is important because it is common, and it significantly increases mortality after cardiac surgery. Although thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is common, it predicts serious adverse outcome when it is severe. Despite the high prevalence of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies in cardiac surgical patients, they typically do not indicate a higher perioperative risk. Recent evidence suggests, however, that when these antibodies are in the immunoglobulin M class, there is an increased risk of nonthrombotic adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. According to the guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians, patients with HIT require parenteral anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. The transition to oral anticoagulation must be undertaken cautiously and only after the platelet count has recovered. Patients with a remote history of HIT can have cardiac surgery safely with unfractionated heparin. Patients with clinically active HIT who require cardiac surgery before the resolution of the HIT preferably should be anticoagulated with bivalirudin, dosed according to body weight and the goal-activated coagulation time. Given that bivalirudin is an established alternative to heparin as a thrombin inhibitor for cardiac surgery, it is likely that future trials will investigate which anticoagulant confers better outcomes after cardiac surgery, as is the case in percutaneous coronary intervention.