Drugs for Gram-Negative Bugs From 2010-2019: A Decade in Review

A literature review spanning January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, was conducted using the PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases to determine the breadth of publication activity in the area of gram-negative bacteria antimicrobial therapy. The number of articles was used as a reflection of scholarly activity. First, PubMed was searched using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): antibacterial agents, Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas. A total of 12 643 articles were identified within PubMed, and 77 862 articles were identified within ISI Web of Science that included these terms. Second, these articles were categorized by antibiotic class to identify relative contributions to the literature by drug category. Third, these studies were used to identify key trends in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections from the past decade. This review highlights advances made in the past 10 years in antibacterial pharmacotherapy and some of the challenges that await the next decade of practice.

New insights in the production of aerosol antibiotics. Evaluation of the optimal aerosol production system for ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam

BACKGROUND

Several aerosol antibiotics are on the market and several others are currently being evaluated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the aerosol droplet size of five different antibiotics for future evaluation as an aerosol administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nebulizers Sunmist(®), Maxineb(®) and Invacare(®) were used in combination with four different "small <6 ml" residual cups and two "large <10 ml" with different loadings 2-4-6-8 ml (8 ml only for large residual cups) with five different antibiotic drugs (ampicilln-sulbactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam). The Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern) was used to evaluate the produced droplet size from each combination

RESULTS

Significant effect on the droplet size produced the different antibiotic (F=96.657, p<0.001) and the residual cup design (F=68.535, p<0.001) but not the different loading amount (p=0.127) and the nebulizer (p=0.715). Interactions effects were found significant only between antibiotic and residual cup (F=16.736, p<0.001). No second order interactions were found statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results firstly indicate us indirectly that the chemical formulation of the drug is the main factor affecting the produced droplet size and secondly but closely the residual cup design.

Inhaled antibiotics for the treatment of chronic bronchopulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in cystic fibrosis: systematic review of randomised controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled antibiotics are probably the safest and most effective therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa chronic lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients.

AREAS COVERED

To summarise the available evidence, a systematic review of the three currently available inhaled antibiotics (aztreonam lysine (AZLI), colistin (COL) and tobramycin (TOB)) was performed. The three AZLI placebo-controlled studies showed that the improvements in FEV1 and mean sputum P. aeruginosa density were statistically significant better than with placebo. The two COL placebo-controlled studies involved few patients but showed that COL was better than placebo in terms of maintenance of some pulmonary function parameters. The tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and tobramycin inhalation powder studies showed that the efficacy of both formulations was similar but significantly better than placebo. In the comparative studies, TIS showed more efficacy than COL solution, colistin inhalation powder showed non-inferiority to TIS and AZLI was superior to TIS.

EXPERT OPINION

Placebo-controlled and comparative clinical trials have shown that clinical evidence of inhaled antibiotics is very different. The choice of treatment for each individual CF patient must be based on the features of the drug (clinical evidence on efficacy and safety), the inhalation system and the patient characteristics. Development of new inhaled antibiotics will allow new end points of efficacy and therapy regimens to be assessed.