Patient-Reported Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life Among People Living with HIV Following the Introduction of Dolutegravir-Based ART Regimens in Ukraine

In 2017, the government of Ukraine initiated its ART Optimization Initiative, revising its national antiretroviral therapy (ART) guidelines and embracing Dolutegravir (DTG) as a backbone of first-line ART regimens. A cross-sectional survey of 464 ART patients from 22 large ART clinics was carried out in mid-2019. The survey assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROS) including treatment satisfaction, physical health, mental health, depression, side effects of ART, and adherence. The associations between ART regimen and PROs were assessed using bivariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations (GEE) models. More than half (55.6%) of the patients were satisfied with their current ART regimen. Less than a half (45.3%) considered their physical health as good while only 36.9% rated their mental health as good, 21.3% reported moderate or severe depression, 82.3% reported no side effect in the past 4 weeks, and 44.4% reported not missing ART medication in the past month. In adjusted analysis, patients starting ART with DTG had higher treatment satisfaction compared to people continuing LPV-based regimens (aOR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.90). Also in adjusted analyses, unemployment, low income, and history of injection drug use were associated with unfavorable PROs. While the results indicate modestly favorable effects of ART Optimization, there is clearly a need for complementary interventions to improve PROs among disadvantaged ART patients in Ukraine.

Patient-reported outcomes to enhance person-centred HIV care

Quality of life has been proposed as the fourth 90 to complement the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets to monitor the global HIV response, highlighting a need to address the holistic needs of people living with HIV beyond viral suppression. This proposal has instigated a wider discussion about the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to improve the treatment and care of an ageing HIV population with increasing comorbidities and a disproportionate burden of social problems. PROs can provide a first-hand assessment of the impact of HIV treatment and care on patients' quality of life, including symptoms. The field of PRO measures is rapidly expanding but still no gold standard exists, raising concerns about tool selection. Challenges also remain in the collection, interpretation, and use of PRO data to improve the performance of the health system. An emerging concern is how to adapt PROs to different sociocultural and geographical settings.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy: Results From NEAT001/ANRS143 Trial Comparing Darunavir/Ritonavir in Combination With Tenofovir/Emtricitabine or Raltegravir

BACKGROUND

There are few data comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomized trials of initial antiretroviral therapy. We present results from a substudy of the NEAT001/ANRS143 trial.

METHODS

The randomized trial compared first-line DRV/r 800/100 mg once daily plus RAL 400 mg twice daily and DRV/r plus TDF/FTC 245/200 mg once daily. Changes in PROs were assessed with 3 questionnaires: EuroQoL 5 domains (EQ-5D), Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale, and HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Major depressive disorder (MDD) was defined as CES-D ≥ 16. General estimating equations were used to model change over 96 weeks in PROs from baseline.

RESULTS

Of the 805 participants, 797 (99%) contributed to the substudy. Baseline PRO data were similar for the 2 randomized groups. Health status improved over time with a mean increase in EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS) of 8.0 by W96 [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.5 to 9.4; P < 0.001], and no statistically significant differences between groups (difference of 0.3 on VAS score (95% CI: -1.7 to 2.3); P = 0.7, global P value ≥0.05 for all domains over follow-up). There was no significant difference between groups on CES-D [difference of -0.1 (95% CI: -1.3 to 1.1); P = 0.9], or MDD during follow-up, adjusted for baseline MDD (odds ratio = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.18; P = 0.9). RAL + DRV/r group had lower level of convenience (P = 0.03) and fitted less well into patients' lifestyle (P = 0.007) than the TDF/FTC + DRV/r regimen, and was associated with lower treatment satisfaction [median score: 53 RAL + DRV/r vs 55 TDF/FTC + DRV/r (P = 0.001)].

CONCLUSION

PROs improved after starting antiretroviral therapy, with no statistically significant difference between groups. The lower satisfaction with RAL + DRV/r may be explained by twice-daily administration.

Patient-reported outcomes in daily clinical practise in HIV outpatient care

INTRODUCTION

The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in outpatient care holds promise as a tool to enhance the quality of care. The management of chronic HIV infection is multidimensional, and clinical assessment includes broad screening to identify complications. With growing constraints on time and resources, the use of PROs may provide a much-needed tool to ensure optimal HIV care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical implementation and use of a Web-based tool to collect PROs in a cohort of HIV-infected individuals.

METHODS

In December 2015, the PRO system AmbuFlex, a Web-based tool for self-reporting of clinical symptoms, was implemented in HIV outpatient care at Aarhus University Hospital. The HIV-specific questionnaire was designed to cover items in the European AIDS Clinical Society guidelines. Patients responded through a Web-based system from home. Based on an HIV-specific algorithm, responses were automatically assigned a green, yellow, or red colour code reflecting the severity of the symptom. HIV-related data from the electronic hospital management system were used to compare respondents and non-respondents. For cognitive and red symptoms, patient records were accessed to address whether PRO provided new information. Furthermore, it was sought to determine whether implementing PROs in clinical care can help focus the consultation on current needs. This was done by checking if a flagged symptom was assessed clinically at the following consultation.

RESULTS

Five hundred and five HIV patients were invited to participate and 277 (55%) accepted the invitation. Compared to respondents, non-respondents were significantly younger and more often female, born outside Denmark, newly diagnosed, and with a plasma viral load >50 copies/ml. Among the 262 correctly received PRO questionnaires, 104 (39%) had solely green colour-coded responses, whereas 59 (23%) had one or more red colour-coded responses. Of 69 red symptoms, 28 (41%) led to a specific clinical assessment. In many cases, PROs appeared to provide new information on cognitive (76%) and red-coded symptoms (42%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of PROs identified several cases where physical or cognitive symptoms appeared to have been unnoticed. A substantial proportion of patients reported no symptoms requiring medical attention, suggesting a potential to individualize outpatient care and redistribute resource utilization.

Patient-reported outcomes with direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: current knowledge and outstanding issues

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play a key role in the evaluation of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The main PROs of particular interest in CHC include quality of life (QoL), fatigue and its functional repercussions, work productivity, adherence to treatment, and risk behaviors. Areas covered: This study summarizes the body of knowledge regarding PROs in CHC with DAA-based therapy. Outstanding related issues are presented and discussed. Expert commentary: Current knowledge on PROs with CHC mainly relies on clinical trial data. All-oral DAA regimens are associated with minimal QoL impairment and symptom burden, rapid recovery once treatment has ended, and improvement in PROs for a non-negligible proportion of treated patients, especially HCV clearers. Further research is needed to analyze both long-term changes in PROs, and PROs in specific populations including people who use drugs, comorbid patients and patients at risk of reinfection.

Using patient-reported outcomes to improve the management of co-infection with HIV and HCV: the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH cohort

The management of co-infection with HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is complicated by viral and drug-drug interactions, treatment-related side effects, and the poor response to therapy of certain HCV genotypes. Current or past drug use may also have a negative impact. HEPAVIH (ANRS CO13) is an ongoing French cohort study of co-infected individuals which combines medical and socio-behavioral follow-up. This cohort study aims at analyzing the course of HCV infection and access to HCV treatment in HIV-HCV co-infected patients, using both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. This article documents the main lessons learned to date from the HEPAVIH data and published literature, while describing research prospects and needs requiring further investigation in the field of patient-reported outcomes.