Neurologic and musculoskeletal effects of tilt-table standing on adults: a systematic review

A feasibility study into the use of the tilt table in the early postoperative rehabilitation of patients undergoing sacrectomy surgery with plastic reconstruction within the Orthopaedic Oncology Service

PURPOSE

Standard post-operative care following sacrectomy requiring plastic surgical reconstruction limits hip flexion and avoids wound pressure. Extended bed rest adversely affects patient function, strength and range of movement. This feasibility study assessed whether early postoperative use of the tilt table was possible and promoted faster mobilisation.

METHODS

Data from 10 patients were collected; five from a "standard tilt table group" and five from an "early tilt table group". Number of days post-operatively patients stood, walked, and were discharged was recorded.

RESULTS

Patients had undergone partial or sub-total sacrectomy with wound closure using a variety of plastic surgical techniques. The "early tilt table" group started on the tilt table at 4.8 ± 2.8 days whereas the "standard tilt table" group started at 13 ± 5.1 days (p = 0.01*). Patients in the "early tilt table group" walked significantly earlier [10.6 ± 2.7*] than the standard group (28 ± 13) (p = 0.02*). LOS in the "early" group was 37.11 ± 11.9 days compared to 58.2 ± 21.8 days in the standard group (p = 0.10). No difference in complications between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Early tilt table use after sacrectomy was safe and enabled a faster achievement of functional goals, thereby reducing LOS. This highlights the need for further evaluation of rehabilitation practice for this group of patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONMultidisciplinary discussion between the plastic surgeon, the tissue viability nurse and the physiotherapist about post-operative precautions and their impact on rehabilitation is essential and may enable earlier use of the tilt table.Early use of the tilt table can enable quicker mobilisation leading to the faster achievement of functional milestones and potentially a reduced length of stay (LOS) without detriment to patient outcomes/complications.The early use of the tilt table can support the central goal of surgery of enabling independence, especially as with such extensive surgery there is a big risk of institutionalisation and prolonged disability.There are potential mental health benefits to earlier mobilisation; however, this needs further investigation.

Early Mobilization for Critically Ill Patients

Advances in the field of critical care medicine have helped improve the survival rate of these ill patients. Several studies have demonstrated the potential benefits of early mobilization as an important component of critical care rehabilitation. However, there have been some inconsistent results. Moreover, the lack of standardized mobilization protocols and the associated safety concerns are a barrier to the implementation of early mobilization in critically ill patients. Therefore, determining the appropriate modalities of implementation of early mobilization is a key imperative to leverage its potential in these patients. In this paper, we review the contemporary literature to summarize the strategies for early mobilization of critically ill patients, assess the implementation and validity based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, as well as discuss the safety aspects of early mobilization.

Mobilising patients with severe acquired brain injury in intensive care (MAWERIC) - Protocol for a randomised cross-over trial

INTRODUCTION

In the early phase after severe brain injury, patients are often bedridden in an attempt to control intracranial homeostasis; however, prolonged immobilisation may trigger complications. There is limited knowledge about the physiological effects of mobilisation in this early phase.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in brain tissue oxygen tension when patients are mobilised using a Sara Combilizer® in the early phase after severe brain injury, in a randomised cross-over design.

METHODS

Patients with traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid haemorrhage or intracranial haematoma, will be randomised to early mobilisation or rest (no mobilisation = control) on the first day that the patient is deemed to be fit for mobilisation, and the opposite on the next day. On both days, patients will undergo continuous multimodal monitoring measuring brain tissue oxygen tension (primary outcome), invasive blood pressure, heart rate, middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity by transcranial Doppler ultrasound, intracranial pressure, and microdialysis markers of cerebral oxidative metabolism.

DISCUSSION

Intensive care unit patients with acute brain injury are frequently immobilised in the early phase after the ictus. The optimal timing and intensity of mobilisation is unknown. The present study attempts to establish if early mobilisation is safe with respect to intracranial homeostasis. Protocol version 1.1. Date: 19.02.2022. Ethical registration: H-21002728; approved on August 11, 2021. GDPR registration: P-2021 - 105; approved on February 10, 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

govidentifier:NCT05038930; approved on September 8, 2021. Electronic case report file: REDCap-database; created on August 13, 2021.