DIABETES REMISSION RATE IN DIFFERENT BMI GRADES FOLLOWING ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Weight Loss and Glycemic Control in Patients With Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are global health challenges. Bariatric surgery has emerged as a potential intervention for managing these conditions, but its efficacy and impact need comprehensive evaluation. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of bariatric surgery on weight loss and glycemic control in patients with obesity and T2DM. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in October 2023, primarily using PubMed. Studies were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, focusing on bariatric surgery's relationship with weight loss and glycemic control. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I (risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions) risk of bias assessment approach. Out of 272 initially identified studies, nine met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing 10,445 participants from various global locations, predominantly targeted middle-aged participants. The findings consistently highlighted the benefits of bariatric surgery in weight reduction and improved glycemic control. However, the degree of benefits varied based on the type of surgical procedure, patient's BMI, and other individual factors. Bariatric surgery offers significant advantages in managing obesity and T2DM. While it consistently aids in weight reduction and glycemic control, individualized treatment approaches considering various patient and procedural factors are crucial for optimal outcomes. When applied to the right patient, bariatric surgery can offer significantly better glycemic control and weight reduction when compared to only medication control and lifestyle adjustments. However, future research should focus on long-term outcomes and the integration of surgical interventions with lifestyle and medical management.

Impact of Metabolic Surgery on Type-2 Diabetes Remission

Diabetes Mellitus is characterized by numerous metabolic disorders, which have in common the serum elevation of glucose, caused for a pancreatic malfunction in insulin secretion and / or its action. It is a non-communicable disease, considered major public health problems and generalized growth worldwide, being a chronic disease, which can generate a high treatment cost. Metabolic surgery is a safe treatment, regulated by the Federal Council of Medicine and useful in treating people with BMI over 30 years of age, who are unable to control pathologies associated with obesity, primarily type 2 diabetes. The general objective of this study is to understand through a literature review the main impacts of metabolic surgery about the remission of DM 2. This present study it is an exploratory and descriptive study carried out through a literature review. Data were collected through research in virtual health databases, at the Virtual Health Library - VHL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Information System, LILACS, National Library of Medicine - MEDLINE, Scielo, USP database, PUBMED theses and books. Metabolic surgery proof be a good and effective treatment for having and maintaining good weight loss, as well as a significant clinical and metabolic improvement that extends beyond weight loss. Metabolic surgery is a satisfactory way of achieving long-term weight reduction in obese individuals, increasing survival for these patients. Obese patients with DM2 have a long-term remission of DM2 after bariatric / metabolic surgery. Therefore, it concludes that such procedure is effective in the treatment of the disease and other diseases associated with obesity.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Perioperative Nutrition, Metabolic, and Nonsurgical Support of Patients Undergoing Bariatric Procedures - 2019 Update: Cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), The Obesity Society (TOS), American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Boards of Directors in adherence with the AACE 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPGs, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include: contextualization in an adiposity-based chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current health care arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory, with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

WEIGHT LOSS COMPARISON AFTER SLEEVE AND ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery is currently the gold standard treatment for obesity. The two most accomplished surgeries are the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and the sleeve gastrectomy, and controversies exist in which is better.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the two techniques in relation to weight loss with at least five years of follow-up.

METHODS

Search in Medline, PubMed, Embase, SciElo, Lilacs, Cochrane databases from 2001 (beginning of vertical gastrectomy) until 2018, using the following headings: "sleeve" or "sleeve gastrectomy" combined with "gastric bypass" or "Roux-en-Y gastric bypass", "weight loss" and "clinical trial". Criteria for inclusion of articles were patients aged between 18 and 65 years; clinical trial; comparison between the two techniques; minimum five-year follow-up; outcome with weight loss assessment.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 1940 articles, of which 185 publications were identified as clinical trials. One hundred and forty-one were excluded, 67 because they did not compare the two techniques, 57 not addressed weight loss and 17 were repeated articles. Thirty-four studies were retrieved for a more detailed analysis; 36 studies were excluded due to a follow-up of less than five years, and another compared the mini-gastric bypass. In total, seven studies were included in the systematic review, but there was no significant difference in three of them.

CONCLUSION

The gastric bypass had a greater weight loss than the vertical gastrectomy in all the evaluated studies.

Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures - 2019 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology, The Obesity Society, American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery, Obesity Medicine Association, and American Society of Anesthesiologists

OBJECTIVE

The development of these updated clinical practice guidelines (CPG) was commissioned by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, the Obesity Medicine Association, and the American Society of Anesthesiologists boards of directors in adherence to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists 2017 protocol for standardized production of CPG, algorithms, and checklists.

METHODS

Each recommendation was evaluated and updated based on new evidence from 2013 to the present and subjective factors provided by experts.

RESULTS

New or updated topics in this CPG include contextualization in an adiposity-based, chronic disease complications-centric model, nuance-based, and algorithm/checklist-assisted clinical decision-making about procedure selection, novel bariatric procedures, enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery protocols, and logistical concerns (including cost factors) in the current healthcare arena. There are 85 numbered recommendations that have updated supporting evidence, of which 61 are revised and 12 are new. Noting that there can be multiple recommendation statements within a single numbered recommendation, there are 31 (13%) Grade A, 42 (17%) Grade B, 72 (29%) Grade C, and 101 (41%) Grade D recommendations. There are 858 citations, of which 81 (9.4%) are evidence level (EL) 1 (highest), 562 (65.5%) are EL 2, 72 (8.4%) are EL 3, and 143 (16.7%) are EL 4 (lowest).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric procedures remain a safe and effective intervention for higher-risk patients with obesity. Clinical decision-making should be evidence-based within the context of a chronic disease. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for nonobese patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: a long-term evaluation

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that the impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) on type 2 diabetes (T2D) occurs regardless of the amount of weight loss. Taking this background into consideration, it is plausible to study this procedure in individuals with lower body mass index (BMI) under clinical treatment failure for uncontrolled T2D.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate the long-term impact of RYGB on T2D regression in a non-obese population.

SETTING

Hospital das Clínicas, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil.

METHODS

Twelve patients with BMI 25 to 30 kg/m² and inadequately controlled T2D underwent RYGB and were followed up for 6 years. Fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, BMI, and the use of insulin and/or oral hypoglycemic agents were assessed. Each variable was analyzed in 3 distinct moments: preoperative evaluation, 2-year postoperative follow-up (2-PO), and 6-year postoperative follow-up (6-PO).

RESULTS

There were no cases of early or late mortality. Mean BMI at preoperative evaluation, 2-PO, and 6-PO were 28.1 ± 1.2; 23.2 ± 2.4; and 24.7 ± 3.1, respectively. The lowest BMI at 6-PO was 19.1 kg/m². Complete remission of T2D was achieved in 16.7%, partial remission in another 16.7%, glycemic control in 25%, and glycemic improvement in 25% of the sample at 6-PO; 16.7% did not present positive glycemic outcomes. Only 1 patient needed to resume insulin administration between 2-PO and 6-PO.

CONCLUSIONS

RYGB was found to be safe and effective in treating uncontrolled T2D in non-obese patients, providing improvements in the glycemic patterns in 83.4% of our sample.