Frontiers in sheep reproduction - making use of natural responses to environmental challenges to manage productivity

Utilising male stimulus to improve the reproductive efficiency of 8-month-old nulliparous ewes and adult parous ewes

We tested whether utilising the male effect to stimulate ewes before the mating period can reduce the time to conception following the introduction of entire rams, and increase fertility, prolificacy, and reproductive rate (number of fetuses per 100 ewes exposed to fertile rams). A retrospective analysis was used to analyse records from 59,716 ewes collected over 34 years (1986-2020) from seven genotypes: Border Leicester, Composite (crossbred), Dorset, Merino, Dorset x Polypay, Rambouillet, White Suffolk. The dataset also included nulliparous young ewes (mated at age 8 months) and adult parous ewes. Vasectomized rams were used to stimulate 20,632 ewes before a mating period that lasted 2 or 3 estrous cycles, and the outcomes were compared with those from 39,084 ewes that had not been stimulated. Independently of genotype, utilising the male stimulus advanced the average conception date by 8 days for young ewes (P < 0.0001) and by 1 day for adult ewes (P < 0.0001). The male stimulus also increased the proportion of ewes that conceived in their first cycle by 33 % for young ewes and by 6 % for adult ewes (P < 0.0001). For the cycle of conception, there were significant (P < 0.0001) effects of two interactions: male stimulus x age at mating and male stimulus x live weight at mating. The male stimulus improved fertility in both adult ewes (99.8 % vs 89 %; P < 0.001) and young ewes (77.7 % vs 81.3 %; P < 0.001). The male stimulus increased the number of young ewes (41.9 % vs 11.1 %; P < 0.001) and adult ewes (16.6 % vs 2.7 %; P < 0.001) that conceived multiple fetuses in the first 17 days of the mating period. The reproductive rate was improved by the male stimulus in young ewes (129 % vs 135 %; P < 0.001) but not in adult ewes (120 % vs 122 %; P = 0.12). When all animals for all breeds were included in the analyses, there were improvements in fertility, prolificacy, and reproductive rate as age and live weight increased at mating (P < 0.0001). We conclude that, independently of genotype, utilising the male stimulus before the mating period reduces the time to conception and improves reproductive performance in both young and adult ewes.

Estrous, ovulation and reproductive responses of ewes synchronized with a long interval prostaglandin-based protocol for timed AI

The aim was to characterize and assess the reproductive performance of a long interval prostaglandin (PG)-based protocol for timed AI (TAI) at different times. During breeding season three experiments were done involving 622 Merino ewes, 11 rams, and five androgenized wethers per 100 ewes. All ewes were estrus synchronized with two PG injections 15-day apart (PG15): Day -15 and 0 (Hour 0). Estrous distribution respect to Hour 0, estrous response and synchrony after Hour 0, and interval from Hour 0 to estrus detection (PG-estrus) was evaluated (Experiment I; n = 105 ewes). Interval from estrus detection to ovulation (estrus-ovulation) and from Hour 0 to ovulation (PG-ovulation) was determined (Experiment II; n = 12 ewes). Visual-physical score of cervical mucus at TAI, non-return to service to Day 23 (NRR23), fertility, prolificacy, and fecundity to Day 60 in four cervical fresh semen TAI groups was evaluated (Experiment III; n = 505 ewes; 107 nulliparous-398 multiparous). Three groups with single service at 56 (Control), 44 or 68, and one with double service at 44 and 68 ± 1.5 h after Hour 0 (PG15-56, PG15-44, PG15-68, and PG15-44/68 groups, respectively) were tested. Ninety-eight-point one percent of the ewes showed estrus from Hour -48 up to 84 respects to Hour 0. Twenty percent of them showed estrus from Hour -48 up to 0, and 78.1 % from Hour 12 up to 84 (Experiment I). The largest proportion of ewes in estrus was observed between Hour 36 and 60 (80.5 %). PG-estrus interval was 54.1 ± 10 h (means ± SD). Estrus-ovulation interval was 32.4 ± 5.8 h, and PG-ovulation interval was 77.0 ± 16.6 h (Experiment II). Ewe parity did not affect any of the reproductive variables (P > 0.05; Experiment III). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) between Control and different groups in mucus score (2.18 ± 0.08, 2.02 ± 0.07, 2.14 ± 0.09, 2.25 ± 0.10), NRR23 (76.0, 71.9, 78.6, 79.4 %) or fertility (66.4, 64.1, 66.7, 73.8 %; PG15-56, PG15-44, PG15-68 or PG15-44/68 groups, respectively). Prolificacy in PG15-44 group was lower (1.07 ± 0.03; P < 0.05) than other groups (1.27 ± 0.05, 1.23 ± 0.05, 1.20 ± 0.04), and fecundity than PG15-44/68 group (0.84, 0.69, 0.82, 0.89), without differences among other groups (PG15-56, PG15-44, PG15-68 or PG15-44/68 groups, respectively). We concluded that any time between 56 and 68 h after PG15 protocol could be used to perform cervical TAI using fresh semen, without benefits of a double TAI service at 44 and 68 h.

Perspective: science and the future of livestock industries

Since the 1990s, livestock industries have been forced to respond to major pressures from society, particularly with respect to methane emissions and animal welfare. These challenges are exacerbated by the inevitability of global heating and the effects it will have on livestock productivity. The same challenges also led to questions about the value of animal-sourced foods for feeding the world. The industries and the research communities supporting them are meeting those challenges. For example, we can now envisage solutions to the ruminant methane problem and those solutions will also improve the efficiency of meat and milk production. Animal welfare is a complex mix of health, nutrition and management. With respect to health, the 'One Health' concept is offering better perspectives, and major diseases, such as helminth infection, compounded by resistance against medication, are being resolved through genetic selection. With respect to nutrition and stress, 'fetal programming' and the epigenetic mechanisms involved offer novel possibilities for improving productivity. Stress needs to be minimized, including stress caused by extreme weather events, and solutions are emerging through technology that reveals when animals are stressed, and through an understanding of the genes that control susceptibility to stress. Indeed, discoveries in the molecular biology of physiological processes will greatly accelerate genetic progress by contributing to genomic solutions. Overall, the global context is clear - animal-sourced food is an important contributor to the future of humanity, but the responses of livestock industries must involve local actions that are relevant to geographical and socio-economic constraints.