Monitoring the quality of the water used in mobile dialysis services in intensive care units in the city of Rio de Janeiro

Enhancing infection control in dialysis at a resource limited public healthcare institute: A cross-sectional study on microbiological quality assessment of dialysis water and dialysate

PURPOSE

To evaluate the microbiological quality of dialysis water and dialysate samples from hemodialysis units at a tertiary care government hospital and to assess the use of culture, endotoxin and periodicity of testing these assays to guide the actions of monitoring the quality of hemodialysis fluids, implement preventive and corrective actions, and improve the safety and outcomes of the dialysis process.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted at a 250-bedded super-specialty government hospital with a 24/7 hemodialysis unit equipped with 40 dialysis machines. Dialysis water and dialysate samples were collected monthly and analysed for microbial contamination and endotoxin levels as per AAMI guidelines. Bacterial cultures were done using Reasoner's Agar plates, and endotoxin analysis was performed using gel clot assay. Interpretation of results was based on predefined thresholds.

RESULTS

Among the 740 samples processed for microbial culture 19.6 % and 80.4% were unacceptable and acceptable respectively.Among the acceptable samples 10.5 % were at action level. At the end of 2 days of incubation, 15.2%dialysis water samples and 5.1%dialysate samples had unacceptable levels of bacterial colonies and at 5days additional 10.6 % dialysis water samples and 7.7%dialysate samples were unacceptable. 21.5 % of the samples tested for endotoxin had unacceptable levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular monitoring of water quality in government healthcare hemodialysis units is crucial for quality of care, timely preventive and corrective actions for mitigating adverse outcomes. Processing cultures for 5-7 days is essential for detecting all contaminated specimens. While there might be a link between endotoxin levels and bacterial contamination, both endotoxin testing and bacterial culture independently are vital for evaluating water quality in dialysis settings. A comprehensive approach integrating various testing methods is necessary to uphold patient safety and enable necessary improvements.

Water quality and adverse health effects on the hemodialysis patients: An overview

Hemodialysis is considered a treatment of choice for patients with renal failure worldwide, allowing the replacement of some kidney functions by diffusion and ultrafiltration processes. Over 4 million people require some form of renal replacement therapy, with hemodialysis being the most common. During the procedure, contaminants in the water and the resulting dialysate may pass into the patient's blood and lead to toxicity. Thus, the quality of the associated dialysis solutions is a critical issue. Accordingly, the discussion of the importance of a dialysis water delivery system controlled by current standards and recommendations, with efficient monitoring methods, disinfection systems, and chemical and microbiological analysis, is crucial for improving the health outcomes of these patients. The importance of treatment, monitoring, and regulation is emphasized by presenting several case studies concerning the contamination of hemodialysis water and the adverse effects on the respective patients.

Evaluation of Some Chemical Parameters of Hemodialysis Water: A Case Study in Iran

BACKGROUND

One of the most common diseases in the world is kidney failure, which can lead to the death of patients. Hemodialysis is a treatment for patients whose kidneys are failing. The water used to perform dialysis must be healthy, safe, and clean. This study aimed to investigate the concentration of heavy metals in hemodialysis water in one of the Hospitals in Iran and compare it with European Pharmacopeia (EPH) and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards.

METHODS

The present study is a descriptive-analytical study conducted on the inlet water of hemodialysis machines in hospital. The samples were collected for 3 months from June to September 2021, Which was examined in terms of free residual chlorine, electrical conductivity, pH, and calcium, magnesium, sodium, aluminum, zinc, copper, and lead concentration. Metals concentration in hemodialysis water was measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) technique.

RESULTS

The average value of parameters such as electrical conductivity, pH, residual free chlorine, sodium, calcium, magnesium, zinc, copper and lead in the hemodialysis water was less than the AAMI and EPH standards limits. There was a significant difference at the 95% confidence level with the standard limits, but the aluminum concentration was higher than the standard limits. Also, by examining the medical files of dialysis patients, the most observed problems were anemia and bone diseases, which are probably caused by exposure to high concentrations of aluminum in hemodialysis water.

CONCLUSION

In present study the aluminum concentration is higher than the standard limits. Considering that the higher aluminum concentration can cause diseases such as anemia, bone diseases, nervous deterioration, and death in hemodialysis patients, therefore, it is recommended to continuously evaluate and monitor the quality of hemodialysis water and the performance of its treatment system.