NONINVASIVE BREATH TESTS FOR DIAGNOSIS OF SIBO AND LACTOSE INTOLERANCE IN PATIENTS ON CHEMOTHERAPY TREATMENT FOR COLORECTAL AND GASTRIC CÂNCER

Global prevalence and moderating factors of malnutrition in colorectal cancer survivors: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aims to estimate the global prevalence of severe, moderate, overall malnutrition and moderating factors of malnutrition in colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in Embase, CINAHL, Medline-OVID, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to February 8, 2024, without language, region, or publication date restrictions. A generalized linear mixed model and random-effects model were used to examine the pooled prevalence, and moderator analyses were implemented to investigate variations in the pooled prevalence.

RESULTS

In 35 studies involving 9,278 colorectal cancer survivors, the global prevalence was 12.10% for severe malnutrition (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.28-16.92; n = 507), 33.13% for moderate malnutrition (95% CI: 28.93-37.34; n: 2,192), and 47.78% for overall malnutrition (95% CI: 41.60-53.96; n: 3,812). Asia showed higher rates of severe malnutrition 16.67% (95% CI: 4.66-28.68, n: 232) and overall malnutrition 53.17% (95% CI: 39.66-66.69, n: 1,913), whereas low-middle income countries demonstrated higher rates of overall malnutrition 67.46% (95% CI: 30.25-100.00, n: 82). Male sex, colon cancer, advanced stage, metastasis, chemotherapy, surgery, adjuvant treatment, smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes significantly moderated overall malnutrition prevalence.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis reports detailed data on the global prevalence of CRC survivors experience malnutrition, highlighting that health-care professionals should consider the identified moderating factors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Addressing malnutrition in CRC survivors is critical, as early and proactive nutritional management can enhance recovery, improve quality of life, and potentially reduce cancer-related complications associated with malnutrition.

Glucose breath test for the detection of small intestine bacterial overgrowth: Impact of diet prior to the test

BACKGROUND

Glucose breath test (GBT) is used for the diagnosis of small intestine bacterial overgrowth. A restrictive diet without fibers and/or fermentable food is recommended on the day before the test. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the impact of two different restrictive diets on the results of GBT.

METHODS

A change of the pretest restrictive diet was applied in our lab on September 1, 2020. The recommended diet was a fiber-free diet before this date, and a fiber-free diet plus restriction of all fermentable food afterward. We thus compared the results of GBT performed before (group A) and after (group B) this pretest diet modification. Demographics, reasons to perform GBT, digestive symptoms, and hydrogen and methane baseline values and variations after glucose ingestion were compared between the two groups.

KEY RESULTS

269 patients underwent GBT in group A, and 316 patients in group B. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographics. Methane and hydrogen baseline values were significantly higher in group A (respectively 14 [18] vs. 8 [14] ppm, p < 0.01 and 11 [14] vs. 6 [8] ppm, p < 0.01). The percentage of positive tests was higher in group A for methane (43% vs. 28%, p < 0.05), and for hydrogen (18% vs. 12%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

This retrospective study suggests the importance of the restrictive diet prior to GBT. A strict limitation of fibers and fermentable food decreased hydrogen and methane baseline values, and the prevalence of positive GBT. Thus a strict restrictive diet should be recommended on the day before the test, in order to limit the impact of food on hydrogen and methane breath levels, and possibly improve the diagnosis quality of GBT.