Red blood cell transfusions worsen the outcomes even in critically ill patients undergoing a restrictive transfusion strategy

Transfusion of stored autologous blood in patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei: A retrospective analysis of its safety and outcome

Background

Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease that presents as a malignant tumor on the peritoneal surface. Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is the standard treatment for this disease and frequently requires a red blood cell transfusion. However, due to the limited collection and supply of allogeneic blood, surgical treatment may be delayed due to inadequate preparation of allogeneic blood in the course of clinical treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transfusion of stored autologous blood in patients with low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei.

Methods

Pseudomyxoma peritonei patients who received cytoreductive surgery combined with heat-infused peritoneal chemotherapy were divided into two groups: transfusion of allogeneic blood and transfusion of stored autologous blood. A comparison of the differences in multiple factors between the two groups was performed, including tumor recurrence, survival time, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, coagulation function (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and fibrinogen), total hospital stay duration, and incidence of serious adverse events after surgery.

Results

Propensity scores matching analysis yielded 34 patients with allogeneic blood transfusion and 34 patients with stored autologous blood transfusion. Comparison analysis did not show statistical differences in several factors, including age, tumor grade, tumor recurrence rate after surgery, etc., between the two groups. The cytoreductive degree was considered an independent risk factor for tumor recurrence. The pseudomyxoma peritonei patients in the autologous transfusion group had a higher 5-year survival rate and a longer survival time. Moreover, transfusion of stored autologous blood did not increase the rate of tumor recurrence, or the total hospital stay duration after surgery, the hemoglobin level and coagulation function were well stabilized within 24 h after surgery, and there was a low incidence of serious adverse events.

Conclusion

The clinical application of transfusion of stored autologous blood in pseudomyxoma peritonei patients is safe and effective.

Post-operative of bleeding, haemolysis and coagulation in mechanical circulatory support patients

There are unique complications arising from mechanical support devices but some of the long-term systemic haematological complications are indistinguishable from management problems affecting the care of other patients receiving intermediate to long term care in the cardiac ICU. The field of mechanical cardiac assist device (MCAD) is evolving. Despite major changes in design of these devices the most feared haematological complications have remained unchanged, namely haemolysis, pump thrombosis or thromboembolism. This review article gives an overview over the pathophysiology of MCAD related haematological complications, their management and where possible an outlook on future strategies to prevent such complications. The impact of MCAD on blood is discussed, starting with rheology, common pump mechanisms, current and future pump surface coating materials, anatomical considerations of the connection of the circuit and design of the circuit itself. Moreover, the duration of the cardiovascular support, impact of bleeding complications and other patient factors. This article also covers the impact of long term mechanical cardiac support on the properties of platelets, the anticoagulation strategies and a basic guide to the differential diagnosis of haemolysis is reviewed. The section on anaemia considers anaemia in the wider perioperative setting for patients in critical care having undergone cardiac surgery and also discusses transfusion alternatives.

Is haemoglobin below 7.0 g/dL an optimal trigger for allogenic red blood cell transfusion in patients admitted to intensive care units? A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVES

We employed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess benefits and risks of a threshold of haemoglobin level below 7 g/dL versus liberal transfusion strategy among critically ill patients, and even patients with septic shock.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We performed systematical searches for relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed databases up to 1 September 2019.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

RCTs among adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients comparing 7 g/dL as restrictive strategy with liberal transfusion were incorporated.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The clinical outcomes, including short-term mortality, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic events, were screened and analysed after data collection. We applied odds ratios (ORs) to analyse dichotomous outcomes and standardised mean differences (SMDs) to analyse continuous outcomes with fixed or random effects models based on heterogeneity evaluation for each outcome.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with 3415 patients were included. Compared with a more liberal threshold, a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion threshold <7 g/dL haemoglobin showed no significant difference in short-term mortality (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.67 to 1.21, p=0.48, I²=53%), length of hospital stay (SMD: -0.11, 95% CI: -0.30 to 0.07, p=0.24, I²=71%), length of ICU stay (SMD: -0.03, 95% CI: -0.14 to 0.08, p=0.54, I²=0%) or ischaemic events (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.48, p=0.48, I²=51%). However, we found that the incidence of MI (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.98, p=0.04, I²=0%) was lower in the group with the threshold <7 g/dL than that with the more liberal threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

An RBC transfusion threshold <7 g/dL haemoglobin is incapable of decreasing short-term mortality in ICU patients according to currently published evidences, while it might have potential role in reducing MI incidence.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a treatment option for severe aortic stenosis in patients at intermediate or high surgical risk. However, until recently there was insufficient evidence regarding the outcomes of TAVR compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for patients at low risk.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of all randomized trials comparing the efficacy and safety of TAVR versus SAVR in patients at low surgical risk. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, using fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four trials were eligible for analysis and comprised a total of 2887 patients (1497 allocated to TAVR and 1390 allocated to SAVR group). TAVR was associated with a 39% relative risk reduction (RRR) of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (absolute risk reduction ARR of 3.7%; RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.47-0.79); 39% RRR of overall mortality (ARR of 1.4%; RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.96) and 45% RRR of cardiovascular mortality (ARR of 1.3%; RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.33-0.90), 69% RRR of life threatening or disabling bleeding (ARR of 7.0%; RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.22-0.44), 73% RRR of new-onset atrial fibrillation (ARR of 29%; RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.20-0.35) and 73% RRR of acute kidney injury (ARR of 2.1%; RR 0.27; 95% CI 0.14-0.56) as compared with SAVR. In contrast, TAVR was associated with a 4.7-fold increased risk of new pacemaker (PM) implantation (RR 4.72; 95% CI 1.83-12.15), which was driven by use of self-expanding valves.

CONCLUSION

TAVR in low-risk patients is superior to SAVR for the majority of outcomes.

The effect of red blood cell transfusion on iron metabolism in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Anemia of inflammation (AI) has a high prevalence in critically ill patients. In AI, iron metabolism is altered, as high levels of inflammation-induced hepcidin reduce the amount of iron available for erythropoiesis. AI is treated with red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. The effect of RBC transfusion on iron metabolism during inflammatory processes in adults is unknown. We investigated the effect of RBC transfusion on iron metabolism in critically ill patients.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study in 61 critically ill patients who received 1 RBC unit, levels of iron variables were determined before, directly after, and 24 hours after transfusion in septic and nonseptic patients.

RESULTS

Serum iron levels were low and increased after transfusion (p = 0.02). However, RBC transfusion had no effect on transferrin saturation (p = 0.14) and ferritin levels (p = 0.74). Hepcidin levels increased after RBC transfusion (p = 0.01), while interleukin-6 levels decreased (p = 0.03). In septic patients, RBC transfusion induced a decrease in haptoglobin levels compared to baseline, which did not occur in nonseptic patients (p = 0.01). The effect of RBC transfusion on other iron variables did not differ between septic and nonseptic patients.

CONCLUSION

Transfusion of a RBC unit transiently increases serum iron levels in intensive care unit patients. The increase in hepcidin levels after transfusion can further decrease iron release from intracellular storage making it available for erythropoiesis. RBC transfusion is associated with a decrease in haptoglobin levels in septic compared to nonseptic patients, but did not affect other markers of hemolysis.

Anaemia and transfusion triggers in critically ill patients - What we have learnt thus far

Anaemia is a common finding in critically ill patients, the cause of which is multi-factorial including: sepsis, haemolysis (and disseminated intravascular coagulation), iatrogenic blood loss secondary to laboratory sampling, post-operative anaemia, bone marrow suppression/failure, decreased production of erythropoietin, anaemia secondary to drugs/toxins, overt or occult blood loss, functional iron deficiency, poor nutrition and haemodilution. Anaemia is associated with deleterious outcomes including increased risk of cardiac-related morbidity and mortality and decrease in oxygen-carrying capacity in the face of increased metabolic demands. There is a growing body of evidence, which demonstrates that packed red blood cell transfusions are associated with poorer outcomes. Clinicians therefore need to weigh the potential benefit of treating anaemia against the desire to avoid unnecessary transfusions. We explored current literature regarding transfusion triggers and morbidity and mortality associated with packed red blood cell transfusions transfusion, concentrating on studies that have been conducted in critical care patients. In addition, we reflected on trials which considered the viability of iron transfusion and erythropoietin in critically unwell patients.

Randomized Controlled Study on Safety and Feasibility of Transfusion Trigger Score of Emergency Operations

Background:

Due to the floating of the guideline, there is no evidence-based evaluation index on when to start the blood transfusion for patients with hemoglobin (Hb) level between 7 and 10 g/dl. As a result, the trigger point of blood transfusion may be different in the emergency use of the existing transfusion guidelines. The present study was designed to evaluate whether the scheme can be safely and effectively used for emergency patients, so as to be supported by multicenter and large sample data in the future.

Methods:

From June 2013 to June 2014, patients were randomly divided into the experimental group (Peri-operative Transfusion Trigger Score of Emergency [POTTS-E] group) and the control group (control group). The between-group differences in the patients’ demography and baseline information, mortality and blood transfusion-related complications, heart rate, resting arterial pressure, body temperature, and Hb values were compared. The consistency of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion standards of the two groups of patients with the current blood transfusion guideline, namely the compliance of the guidelines, utilization rate, and per-capita consumption of autologous RBC were analyzed.

Results:

During the study period, a total of 72 patients were recorded, and 65 of them met the inclusion criteria, which included 33 males and 32 females with a mean age of (34.8 ± 14.6) years. 50 underwent abdomen surgery, 4 underwent chest surgery, 11 underwent arms and legs surgery. There was no statistical difference between the two groups for demography and baseline information. There was also no statistical differences between the two groups in anesthesia time, intraoperative rehydration, staying time in postanesthetic care unit, emergency hospitalization, postoperative 72 h Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores, blood transfusion-related complications and mortality. Only the POTTS-E group on the 1^st postoperative day Hb was lower than group control, P < 0.05. POTTS-E group was totally (100%) conformed to the requirements of the transfusion guideline to RBC infusion, which was higher than that of the control group (81.25%), P < 0.01. There were no statistical differences in utilization rates of autologous blood of the two groups; the utilization rates of allogeneic RBC, total allogeneic RBC and total RBC were 48.48%, 51.5%, and 75.7% in POTTS-E group, which were lower than those of the control group (84.3%, 84.3%, and 96.8%) P < 0.05 or P < 0.01. Per capita consumption of intraoperative allogeneic RBC, total allogeneic RBC and total RBC were 0 (0, 3.0), 2.0 (0, 4.0), and 3.1 (0.81, 6.0) in POTTS-E groups were all lower than those of control group (4.0 [2.0, 4.0], 4.0 [2.0, 6.0] and 5.8 [2.7, 8.2]), P < 0.05 or P < 0.001.

Conclusions:

Peri-operative Transfusion Trigger Score-E evaluation scheme is used to guide the application of RBC. There are no differences in the recent prognosis of patients with the traditional transfusion guidelines. This scheme is safe; Compared with doctor experience-based subjective assessment, the scoring scheme was closer to patient physiological needs for transfusion and more reasonable; Utilization rate and the per capita consumption of RBC are obviously declined, which has clinical significance and is feasible. Based on the abovementioned three points, POTTS-E scores scheme is safe, reasonable, and practicable and has the value for carrying out multicenter and large sample clinical researches.

Anemia in Intensive Cardiac Care Unit patients - An underestimated problem

The heterogeneous group of patients admitted to Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ICCU) as well as nonspecific complaints associated with anemia might be the reason for underdiagnosing or minimization of this problem. Because of this heterogeneity, there are no clear guidelines to follow. It is known that anemia is impairing the outcome. Thus, it is crucial to keep alert in the diagnosis and treatment of anemia, especially in critically ill cardiac patients. The greatest groups of patients admitted to ICCU are those with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), severe arrhythmias as well as individuals after cardiac operations. However, patients suffering other critical cardiac illnesses quite often become anemic during hospitalization in ICCU. It is because anemia is typed in the clinical features of heavy diseases or may be the consequence of treatment. The current review focuses on the incidence, complex etiology and predictive role of anemia in a diverse group of ICCU patients. It discusses clinical aspects of anemia treatment in particular groups of critically ill cardiac patients because proper treatment increases chances for recovery and improves the outcome in this severe group of patients.

Association of red blood cell transfusion and in-hospital mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Previous research has debated whether red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is associated with decreased or increased mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship of RBC transfusion with in-hospital mortality in ICU patients.

METHODS

We carried out a literature search on Medline (1950 through May 2013), Web of Science (1986 through May 2013) and Embase (1980 through May 2013). We included all prospective and retrospective studies on the association between RBC transfusion and in-hospital mortality in ICU patients. The relative risk for the overall pooled effects was estimated by random effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess potential bias.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 28,797 participants from 18 studies. The pooled relative risk for transfused versus nontransfused ICU patients was 1.431 (95% CI, 1.105 to 1.854). In sensitivity analyses, the pooled relative risk was 1.211 (95% CI, 0.975 to 1.505) if excluding studies without adjustment for confounders, 1.178 (95% CI, 0.937 to 1.481) if excluding studies with relative high risk of bias, and 0.901 (95% CI, 0.622 to 1.305) if excluding studies without reporting hazard ratio (HR) or relative risk (RR) as an effect size measure. Subgroup analyses revealed increased risks in studies enrolling patients from all ICU admissions (RR 1.513, 95%CI 1.123 to 2.039), studies without reporting information on leukoreduction (RR 1.851, 95%CI 1.229 to 2.786), studies reporting unadjusted effect estimates (RR 3.933, 95%CI 2.107 to 7.343), and studies using odds ratio as an effect measure (RR 1.465, 95%CI 1.049 to 2.045). Meta-regression analyses showed that RBC transfusion could decrease risk of mortality in older patients (slope coefficient -0.0417, 95%CI -0.0680 to -0.0154).

CONCLUSIONS

There is lack of strong evidence to support the notion that ICU patients who receive RBC transfusion have an increased risk of in-hospital death. In studies adjusted for confounders, we found that RBC transfusion does not increase the risk of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients. Type of patient, information on leukoreduction, statistical method, mean age of patient enrolled and publication year of the article may account for the disagreement between previous studies.

Transfusional profile in different types of intensive care units

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

anemia is a common clinical finding in intensive care units. The red blood cell transfusion is the main form of treatment, despite the associated risks. Thus, we proposed to evaluate the profile of transfusional patients in different intensive care units.

METHODS

prospective analysis of patients admitted in the intensive care units of a tertiary university hospital with an indication for transfusion of packed red blood cells. Demographic profile and transfusional profile were collected, a univariate analysis was done, and the results were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

408 transfusions were analyzed in 71 patients. The mean hemoglobin concentration on admission was 9.7 ± 2.3g/dL and the pre-transfusional concentration was 6.9 ± 1.1g/dL. The main indications for transfusion were hemoglobin concentration (49%) and active bleeding (32%). The median number of units transfused per episode was 2 (1-2) and the median storage time was 14 (7-21) days. The number of patients transfused with hemoglobin levels greater than 7 g/dL and the number of bags transfused per episode were significantly different among intensive care units. Patients who received three or more transfusions had longer mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit stay and higher mortality after 60 days. There was an association of mortality with disease severity but not with transfusional characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

the practice of blood products transfusion was partially in agreement with the guidelines recommended, although there are differences in behavior between the different profiles of intensive care units. Transfused patients evolved with unfavorable outcomes. Despite the scarcity of blood in blood banks, the mean storage time of the bags was high.

Anaemia secondary to critical illness: an unexplained phenomenon

Almost all patients suffering critical illness become anaemic during their time in intensive care. The cause of this anaemia and its management has been a topic of debate in critical care medicine for the last two decades. Packed red cell transfusion has an associated cost and morbidity such that decreasing the number of units transfused would be of great benefit. Our understanding of the aetiology and importance of this anaemia is improving with recent and ongoing work to establish the cause, effect and best treatment options. This review aims to describe the current literature whilst suggesting that the nature of the anaemia should be considered with reference to the time point in critical illness. Finally, we suggest that using haemoglobin concentration as a measure of oxygen-carrying capacity has limitations and that ways of measuring haemoglobin mass should be explored.

Impact of more restrictive blood transfusion strategies on clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is accumulating evidence that restricting blood transfusions improves outcomes, with newer trials showing greater benefit from more restrictive strategies. We systematically evaluated the impact of various transfusion triggers on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was searched from 1966 to April 2013 to find randomized trials evaluating a restrictive hemoglobin transfusion trigger of <7 g/dL, compared with a more liberal trigger. Two investigators independently extracted data from the trials. Outcomes evaluated included mortality, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary edema, infections, rebleeding, number of patients transfused, and units of blood transfused per patient. Extracted data also included information on study setting, design, participant characteristics, and risk for bias of the included trials. A secondary analysis evaluated trials using less restrictive transfusion triggers, and a systematic review of observational studies evaluated more restrictive triggers.

RESULTS

In the primary analysis, pooled results from 3 trials with 2364 participants showed that a restrictive hemoglobin transfusion trigger of <7 g/dL resulted in reduced in-hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR], 0.74; confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.92), total mortality (RR, 0.80; CI, 0.65-0.98), rebleeding (RR, 0.64; CI, 0.45-0.90), acute coronary syndrome (RR, 0.44; CI, 0.22-0.89), pulmonary edema (RR, 0.48; CI, 0.33-0.72), and bacterial infections (RR, 0.86; CI, 0.73-1.00), compared with a more liberal strategy. The number needed to treat with a restrictive strategy to prevent 1 death was 33. Pooled data from randomized trials with less restrictive transfusion strategies showed no significant effect on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with critical illness or bleed, restricting blood transfusions by using a hemoglobin trigger of <7 g/dL significantly reduces cardiac events, rebleeding, bacterial infections, and total mortality. A less restrictive transfusion strategy was not effective.