Synergistic effects of sulbactam in multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: The Silent Plight of Burn Patients

The global increasing spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) is threatening the control of various infections in vulnerable populations and patient groups. One of the most affected groups is patients with burns, who are prone to hyperinfection as they suffer from a hypermetabolic state and weaken immune barriers. Those patients also share the infection risk of patients hospitalized for a long time, including ventilator-associated pneumonia and urinary tract infections. While some preventative and therapeutic management styles are still controversial, we discuss consensuses here. In this review, we aim to present the current knowledge on multidrug resistance with a special focus on patients with burns, discuss various causative organisms and their treatment options, and highlight the importance of antibiotic stewardship and teamwork in responding to an outbreak of MDROs.

Combinations of Antibiotics Effective against Extensively- and Pandrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Patient Isolates

Infections due to drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains are increasing and cause significant morbidity and mortality, especially in hospitalized and critically ill patients. A. baumannii rapidly develops resistance to numerous antibiotics, and antibiotics traditionally used against this deadly pathogen have been failing in recent years, highlighting the need to identify new treatment strategies. Treatment options that have shown promise include revisiting common antibiotics not typically used against A. baumannii, evaluating new antibiotics recently introduced to market, and identifying combinations of antibiotics that display synergistic interactions. In this study, we characterized the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of extensively (XDR) and pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii patient isolates. We examined the potency of 22 standard-of-care antibiotics and the newer antibiotics eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin against these strains. Furthermore, we examined combinations of these antibiotics against our collection to identify synergistic effects. We found that this collection is highly resistant to most or all standard-of-care antibiotics, except for minocycline and rifampin. We show that eravacycline and omadacycline are effective against these strains based on minimum inhibitory concentrations. We also identified two highly effective combinations, cefepime and amikacin and cefepime and ampicillin-sulbactam, which exhibited high rates of synergy against this collection. This information is valuable in our battle against highly drug resistant and virtually untreatable A. baumannii infections.

Genomic Insights into and In Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Combination Therapies for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Background and Objectives: Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii), particularly carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB), represents a grave concern in healthcare settings and is associated with high mortality. This study aimed to conduct molecular, mutational, and phylogenetic analyses of specific genes in CRAB and evaluate the synergistic effects of selected antimicrobial combinations. Materials and Methods: Phenotypic characterization was performed on six CRAB strains by using the Modified Hodge Test (MHT) and IMP-EDTA Double-Disc Synergy Test (IMP-EDTA DDST). Carbapenemase- and metallo-beta-lactamase-encoding genes were amplified by using Polymerase Chain Reaction. Phylogenetic analysis using the MEGA 11 tool was used to determine the evolutionary relatedness of these genes. Mutational analysis was performed by using I-Mutant, MUPro, and PHD-SNP bioinformatics tools to predict mutations in the carbapenemase-encoding genes. Microdilution checkerboard titration assessed the synergistic effects of antimicrobial combinations (azithromycin-meropenem, rifampicin-meropenem, meropenem-colistin, and azithromycin-colistin) on these CRAB isolates. Results: The phenotypic characterization of six CRAB isolates revealed positive results for MHT and IMP-EDTA DDST. The molecular characterization revealed that carbapenemase- and MBL-encoding genes were present in all isolates with varying frequencies, including blaOXA-51 (100%) and blaIMP (0%). The sequence analysis revealed high evolutionary relatedness to sequences in the NCBI database. The mutational analysis identified 16 mutations, of which 1 mutation (P116L) in the blaOXA-58 gene predicted a change in the protein product, potentially contributing to carbapenem resistance. The checkerboard titration method did not reveal any synergism among the tested antimicrobial combinations against CRAB. Conclusion: This study's findings underscore the significant challenges posed by CRAB isolates harboring multiple resistant genes in treatment. This highlights the urgent need for novel antimicrobial agents, a crucial step towards reducing mortality rates not only in Pakistan but also globally.

The synergic and addictive activity of biogenic silver nanoparticle associated with meropenem against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

AIMS

Antibiotic management of infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii often fails due to antibiotic resistance (especially to carbapenems) and biofilm-forming strains. Thus, the objective here was to evaluate in vitro the antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of biogenic silver nanoparticle (Bio-AgNP) combined with meropenem, against multidrug-resistant isolates of A. baumannii.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, A. baumannii ATCC® 19606™ and four carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (Ab) strains were used. The antibacterial activity of Bio-AgNP and meropenem was evaluated through broth microdilution. The effect of the Bio-AgNP association with meropenem was determined by the checkboard method. Also, the time-kill assay and the integrity of the bacterial cell membrane were evaluated. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of Bio-AgNP and meropenem alone and in combination was determined. Bio-AgNP has antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration ranging from 0.46 to 1.87 μg ml-1. The combination of Bio-AgNP and meropenem showed a synergistic and additive effect against Ab strains, and Bio-AgNP was able to reduce the MIC of meropenem from 4- to 8-fold. Considering the time-kill of the cell, meropenem and Bio-AgNP when used in combination reduced bacterial load to undetectable levels within 10 min to 24 h after treatment. Protein leakage was observed in all treatments evaluated. When combined, meropenem/Bio-AgNP presents biofilm inhibition for Ab2 isolate and ATCC® 19606™, with 21% and 19%, and disrupts the biofilm from 22% to 50%, respectively. The increase in nonviable cells in the biofilm can be observed after treatment with Bio-AgNP and meropenem in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii strains.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of Bio-AgNP with meropenem can be a therapeutic option in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

Evaluation of synergistic activity of antibiotic combinations in extensive drug-resistant Acinetobacter species using checkerboard assay

Introduction. Acinetobacter is one of the challenging drug-resistant organisms that can endanger patients' lives if not treated properly.Aim. This study was designed to investigate the activity of three synergistic antimicrobial combinations against extensive drug-resistant Acinetobacter isolates; ampicillin/sulbactam plus amikacin, ampicillin/sulbactam plus ciprofloxacin, and meropenem plus amikacin.Methodology. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of 100 XDR-Acinetobacter isolates were determined using the Vitek2 system. The broth micro-dilution method was performed to determine tigecycline MIC. Checkerboard assay was used to evaluate in vitro activity of the three antibiotic combinations.Results. MIC results by the Vitek 2C system revealed that all Acinetobacter isolates were resistant to all tested antibiotics except for colistin against which no resistance was reported. As for tigecycline, all isolates were susceptible. Regarding MIC results of each antibiotic, all isolates were resistant to meropenem and ciprofloxacin. While 95 % of isolates were resistant to both ampicillin/sulbactam and amikacin. The activities of antibiotic combinations by checkerboard assay were as follows: ampicillin/sulbactam plus amikacin was synergic in 52 %, additive 40 % and indifferent in 8 % of isolates, ampicillin/sulbactam plus ciprofloxacin was synergic in 40 %, additive 46 % and indifferent in 14 % of isolates, meropenem/amikacin combination was synergic in 22 %, additive in 49 % of isolates and indifferent in 29 % of isolates. No antagonistic activity was detected against any of the tested antibiotic combinations.Conclusion. Ampicillin/sulbactam plus amikacin showed the highest synergistic activity followed by ampicillin/sulbactam plus ciprofloxacin. This reflects the value of adding aminoglycosides to either of a β-lactam or quinolone. The tested antibiotic combinations are promising treatment options for XDR-Acinetobacter.

Clinical effectiveness of tigecycline in combination therapy against nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB in intensive care units: a retrospective multi-centre observational study

BACKGROUND

Tigecycline has in vitro bacteriostatic activity against a broad spectrum of bacteria, including carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). However, the role of tigecycline in treatment of nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB remains controversial and clinical evidences are limited. We aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of tigecycline as part of the combination treatment of nosocomial CR-GNB pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

This multi-centre cohort study retrospectively enrolled ICU-admitted patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by CR-GNB. Patients were categorized based on whether add-on tigecycline was used in combination with at least one anti-CR-GNB antibiotic. Clinical outcomes and all-cause mortality between patients with and without tigecycline were compared in the original and propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts. A subgroup analysis was also performed to explore the differences of clinical efficacies of add-on tigecycline treatment when combined with various anti-CR-GNB agents.

RESULTS

We analysed 395 patients with CR-GNB nosocomial pneumonia, of whom 148 received tigecycline and 247 did not. More than 80% of the enrolled patients were infected by CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). A trend of lower all-cause mortality on day 28 was noted in tigecycline group in the original cohort (27.7% vs. 36.0%, p = 0.088). In PS-matched cohort (102 patient pairs), patients with tigecycline had significantly lower clinical failure (46.1% vs. 62.7%, p = 0.017) and mortality rates (28.4% vs. 52.9%, p < 0.001) on day 28. In multivariate analysis, tigecycline treatment was a protective factor against clinical failure (PS-matched cohort: aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.95) and all-cause mortality (original cohort: aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-0.99; PS-matched cohort: aHR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.74) at 28 days. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in subgroups of patients suggested significant clinical benefits of tigecycline when added to a colistin-included (log rank p value 0.005) and carbapenem-included (log rank p value 0.007) combination regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective observational study that included ICU-admitted patients with nosocomial pneumonia caused by tigecycline-susceptible CR-GNB, mostly CRAB, tigecycline as part of a combination treatment regimen was associated with lower clinical failure and all-cause mortality rates.

Simultaneous determination of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to a pharmacokinetic study

An efficient and reliable method using LC-MS/MS was established and validated for the simultaneous quantification of meropenem and imipenem in rat plasma. An electronic spray ion source in the positive multiple reaction monitoring mode was used for the detection and the transitions were m/z 384.6 → m/z 141.2 for meropenem, m/z 300.1 → m/z 141.8 for imipenem and m/z 423.4 → m/z 207.1 for matrine (IS). The calibration curves of meropenem and imipenem were linear in the range of 0.50-200 μg/mL. Satisfactory separation was achieved with a total run time of 3.0 min, the injection volume was 3 μl. The retention times of meropenem, imipenem and IS were 1.19, 1.14 and 1.13 min, respectively. Meropenem and imipenem are easily hydrolyzed in plasma. HEPES was used as a stabilizer and added to the plasma samples immediately after centrifugation. Extractions of meropenem, imipenem and IS were carried out by protein precipitation with acetonitrile. The specificity, precision and accuracy, stability, recovery and matrix effects were within acceptance limits. This method was successfully applied to investigate the pharmacokinetics of intravenous injection of meropenem and imipenem single administration or combined with sulbactam in rats. We found that sulbactam has no influence on the pharmacokinetics behavior of meropenem or imipenem.

Losing the Battle but Winning the War: Can Defeated Antibacterials Form Alliances to Combat Drug-Resistant Pathogens?

Despite the recent development of antibacterials that are active against multidrug-resistant pathogens, drug combinations are often necessary to optimize the killing of difficult-to-treat organisms. Antimicrobial combinations typically are composed of multiple agents that are active against the target organism; however, many studies have investigated the potential utility of combinations that consist of one or more antibacterials that individually are incapable of killing the relevant pathogen. The current review summarizes in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies that evaluate combinations that include at least one drug that is not active individually against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, or Staphylococcus aureus. Polymyxins were often included in combinations against all three of the Gram-negative pathogens, and carbapenems were commonly incorporated into combinations against K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. Minocycline, sulbactam, and rifampin were also frequently investigated in combinations against A. baumannii, whereas the addition of ceftaroline or another β-lactam to vancomycin or daptomycin showed promise against S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin or daptomycin. Although additional clinical studies are needed to define the optimal combination against specific drug-resistant pathogens, the large amount of in vitro and in vivo studies available in the literature may provide some guidance on the rational design of antibacterial combinations.

Semi-mechanistic PK/PD modelling of meropenem and sulbactam combination against carbapenem-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii

Due to limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB) infections, antibiotic combinations are commonly used. In this study, we explored the potential efficacy of meropenem-sulbactam combination (MEM/SUL) against CR-AB. The checkerboard method was used to screen for synergistic activity of MEM/SUL against 50 clinical CR-AB isolates. Subsequently, time-kill studies against two CR-AB isolates were performed. Time-kill data were described using a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. Subsequently, Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of 2-log kill, 1-log kill or stasis at 24-h following combination therapy. The MEM/SUL demonstrated synergy against 28/50 isolates. No antagonism was observed. The MIC50 and MIC₉₀ of MEM/SUL were decreased fourfold, compared to the monotherapy MIC. In the time-kill studies, the combination displayed synergistic killing against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations. At concentrations equal to the fractional inhibitory concentration, synergism was observed against one isolate. The PK/PD model adequately delineated the data and the interaction between meropenem and sulbactam. The effect of the combination was driven by sulbactam, with meropenem acting as a potentiator. The simulations of various dosing regimens revealed no activity for the monotherapies. At best, the MEM/SUL regimen of 2 g/4 g every 8 h demonstrated a probability of target attainment of 2-log₁₀ kill at 24 h of 34%. The reduction in the MIC values and the achievement of a moderate PTA of a 2-log₁₀ reduction in bacterial burden demonstrated that MEM/SUL may potentially be effective against some CR-AB infections.

Synergistic Effect of Tazobactam on Amikacin MIC in Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from Burn Patients in Tehran, Iran

BACKGROUND

Burn is still an important global public health challenge. Wound colonization of antibiotic resistant bacteria such as Acinetobacter baumannii can lead to high morbidity and mortality in burn patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of tazobactam on efflux pump, which can cause aminoglycoside resistant in A. baumannii isolated from burn patients.

METHODS

In this study, 47 aminoglycoside resistant A. baumannii spp. were obtained from burn patients, admitted to the Shahid Motahari Burns Hospital in Tehran, Iran, during June-August 2018. The inhibitory effect of tazobactam against adeB such as efflux pump was evaluated by Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) determination of amikacin alone and in combination with tazobactam. Fractional Inhibitory Concentration index (FIC) was used to determine the efficacy of tazobactam/ amikacin combination. Further, semi-quantitative Real- Time PCR was performed to quantify the expression rates of the adeB gene before and after addition of tazobactam/amikacin.

RESULTS

The MIC values were significantly reduced when a combined amikacin and tazobactam was utilized. The most common interaction observed was synergistic (78.2%), followed by.additive effects (21.8%), as per FIC results. The adeB mRNA expression levels were found to be downregulated in 60.7% of isolates treated with tazobactam.

CONCLUSION

Tazobactam can have impact on resistance to aminoglycoside by inhibiting efflux pump. Thus, the combination of tazobactam with amikacin can be used as an alternative treatment approach in multidrug resistant A. baumannii infections.

Non-polymyxin-based combinations as potential alternatives in treatment against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections

Due to limited therapeutic options, combination therapy has been used empirically to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Polymyxin-based combinations have been widely studied and used in the clinical setting. However, the use of polymyxins is often limited due to nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of non-polymyxin-based combinations relative to polymyxin-based combinations and to identify potential synergistic and bactericidal two-drug non-polymyxin-based combinations against CRAB. In vitro activity of 14 two-drug combinations against 50 A. baumannii isolates was evaluated using the checkerboard method. Subsequently, the two best-performing non-polymyxin-based combinations from the checkerboard assay were explored in static time-kill experiments. Concentrations of antibiotics corresponding to the fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) and the highest serum concentration achievable clinically were tested. The most synergistic combinations were fosfomycin/sulbactam (synergistic against 37/50 isolates; 74%), followed by meropenem/sulbactam (synergistic against 28/50 isolates; 56%). No antagonism was observed for any combination. Both fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam combinations exhibited bactericidal and synergistic activity against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations in the time-kill experiments. The meropenem/sulbactam combination displayed synergistic and bactericidal activity against one of two strains at concentrations equal to the FIC. Non-polymyxin-based combinations such as fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam may have a role in the treatment of CRAB. Further in vivo and clinical studies are required to scrutinise these activities further.

Acinetobacter baumannii Resistance: A Real Challenge for Clinicians

Acinetobacter baumannii (named in honor of the American bacteriologists Paul and Linda Baumann) is a Gram-negative, multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogen that causes nosocomial infections, especially in intensive care units (ICUs) and immunocompromised patients with central venous catheters. A. baumannii has developed a broad spectrum of antimicrobial resistance, associated with a higher mortality rate among infected patients compared with other non-baumannii species. In terms of clinical impact, resistant strains are associated with increases in both in-hospital length of stay and mortality. A. baumannii can cause a variety of infections; most involve the respiratory tract, especially ventilator-associated pneumonia, but bacteremia and skin wound infections have also been reported, the latter of which has been prominently observed in the context of war-related trauma. Cases of meningitis associated with A. baumannii have been documented. The most common risk factor for the acquisition of MDR A baumannii is previous antibiotic use, following by mechanical ventilation, length of ICU/hospital stay, severity of illness, and use of medical devices. Current efforts focus on addressing all the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms described in A. baumannii, with the objective of identifying the most promising therapeutic scheme. Bacteriophage- and artilysin-based therapeutic approaches have been described as effective, but further research into their clinical use is required.

Trends, Epidemiology, and Management of Multi-Drug Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Hospitalized Setting

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance is a threat to human health, particularly within vulnerable populations in the hospital and acute care settings. This leads to increasing healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality. Bacteria rapidly evolve novel mechanisms of resistance and methods of antimicrobial evasion. Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii have all been identified as pathogens with particularly high rates of resistance to antibiotics, resulting in a reducing pool of available treatments for these organisms. Effectively combating this issue requires both preventative and reactive measures. Reducing the spread of resistant pathogens, as well as reducing the rate of evolution of resistance is complex. Such a task requires a more judicious use of antibiotics through a better understanding of infection epidemiology, resistance patterns, and guidelines for treatment. These goals can best be achieved through the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs and the development and introduction of new drugs capable of eradicating multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens (MDR GNB). The purpose of this article is to review current trends in MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections in the hospitalized setting, as well as current guidelines for management. Finally, new and emerging antimicrobials, as well as future considerations for combating antibiotic resistance on a global scale are discussed.

Extensive drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a comparative study between non-colistin based combinations

Background The Gastrointestinal Surgery Center (GISC)-Mansoura University, faced a series of extensive drug resistant (XDR) A. baumannii cases, that were microbiologically resistant to penicillins, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, carbapenems and tigecycline. Colistin would have been a last resort therapy in such situation, however, intravenous polymyxins E (colistin) is relatively unavailable in Egypt. Many practitioners tried to form antibiotic combinations from the available antibiotics to overcome the resistance mechanisms of the pathogen. Objective Evaluate the clinical outcomes of these combinations retrospectively. Setting The study took place at the GISC, which is an academic specialized center affiliated with Mansoura University-Egypt. Method Clinical data were collected from the patients' files, where the subjects were classified into two major groups according to the therapeutic intervention. Group 1 included 24 patients divided into 4 subgroups. The first was treated by a Cephalosporin with a Fluoroquinolone (1A), The second was treated by a Carbapenem with a Fluoroquinolone (1B), The third was treated by a B-lactam with an Aminoglycoside (1C) and the fourth was treated by Carbapenem with a Glycylcycline (1D). Group 2 included 6 patients, treated with Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam. Main outcome measure Primary outcomes are the A. baumannii microbiological culture negativity after 14 days of therapy and the 30 days' survival after the antibiotic course, while the secondary outcomes are the expected therapies' side effects. Results Group 2 is associated with significant higher primary outcomes without a significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes. Conclusion The combination of Tigecycline and Ampicillin-Sulbactam, appears to be a clinically effective therapy against XDR A. baumannii, despite each agent being resistant alone, without alerting adverse effects.

In vitro and in vivo assessment of the antibacterial activity of colistin alone and in combination with other antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli

OBJECTIVES

Limited therapeutic options exist for treating severe infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). In this study, the activity of colistin (COL) as monotherapy and in combination with other antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro was investigated. In addition, the efficacy of intravenous colistimethate sodium (CMS) was evaluated in a murine model of urinary tract infection (UTI) induced by MDR Escherichia coli.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), Monte Carlo simulation, fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI), time-kill study and erythrocyte lysis assay were applied to evaluate the effect and cytotoxicity of COL, meropenem, imipenem, doripenem (DOR) and sulbactam alone and in combination. For the in vivo experiment, determination of the bacterial burden and histopathological examination were performed to evaluate the efficacy of CMS against UTI.

RESULTS

Of 106 A. baumannii isolates, 104 (98.1%) were susceptible to COL. In the chequerboard assay, COL + DOR showed the highest rate of synergism (60%). No antagonism or cytotoxicity was observed. All COL-based combinations were able to inhibit or slow bacterial re-growth in a time-kill assay. In an in vivo activity study, intravenous CMS reduced not only the bacterial load but also inflammation and maintained structural integrity of infected bladders and kidneys.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of COL alone in vitro and in vivo suggested that intravenous CMS will be an effective and available therapeutic strategy for UTI due to MDR-GNB. In-depth in vitro tests demonstrated that COL + DOR could be an attractive option, especially when the COL MIC is ≥1 μg/mL.

Evaluation of synergistic effect of tazobactam with meropenem and ciprofloxacin against multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn patients in Tehran

Background:Acinetobacter baumannii is an increasingly important cause of nosocomial infections worldwide. In addition to the intrinsic resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii to many antibiotics, available treatment approaches with older antibiotics are significantly associated with an increase in multiresistant strains. The aim of this study was to evaluate the synergistic effect of tazobactam with meropenem and ciprofloxacin against carbapenems and drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from burn patients in a tertiary burn center in Tehran.

Materials and methods: In this study, a total of 47 clinical isolates of A. baumannii were included from burn patients admitted to the Shahid Motahari Burns Hospital, Tehran, from June 2018 to August 2018. The disk diffusion method was used to determine resistance patterns. The synergistic effect of tazobactam with meropenem and ciprofloxacin was evaluated by determining the MIC. A PCR assay was performed to determine bla_OXA-40-like, bla_OXA-58-like and bla_OXA-24-like.

Results: Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed that all of the isolates were resistant to meropenem and ciprofloxacin. The MIC values decreased in the cases of combined use of ciprofloxacin and meropenem with tazobactam. The bla_OXA-24-like gene was the predominant carbapenemase gene (93.6%), followed by bla_OXA-40-like, which was detected in 48.9% of isolates. None of the A. baumannii isolates harbored the bla_OXA-58-like gene.

Conclusions: Based on in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility in the current study, the MIC of tazobactam combined with meropenem or ciprofloxacin have been shown to be variable. Furthermore, the data acquired from such in vitro conditions should be confirmed by reliable results from sufficiently controlled clinical trials.

Phenolic Plant Extracts Versus Penicillin G: In Vitro Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Bovine Mastitis

Antibiotics are the elective drugs in bovine mastitis (BM) treatment, despite their low rates of efficiency and effectiveness and increasing risk of pathogen resistance. In this sense, it is urgent to discover new and effective antimicrobial agents to apply in BM control and even treatment. Plant extracts have been widely recognized as a rich source of phytochemicals with antimicrobial potential. Thus, the present work aims to compare the bioactivity of Eucalyptus globulus and Juglans regia extracts against Staphylococcus aureus bovine mastitis strains with penicillin G. At non-toxic concentrations, E. globulus exerted a bacteriostatic effect in planktonic cells and J. regia had no antimicrobial activity. Penicillin G, at minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), demonstrated bactericidal activity, but just for S. aureus 3, 5, 6 and ATCC 25923, while the other strains seem to have acquired resistance. On the other hand, E. globulus and penicillin G in combination demonstrated synergy, being the most effective approach against S. aureus 1, 2 and 4. Thus, penicillin alone and in combination with E. globulus or J. regia seems to be promissory strategies to control bovine mastitis infections.

Appropriate composites of cefoperazone-sulbactam against multidrug-resistant organisms

Objectives

This study aims to assess the in vitro activity of different cefoperazone-sulbactam ratios against different multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

Materials and methods

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and susceptibility rates of cefoperazone, sulbactam and cefoperazone-sulbactam at fixed ratios of 2:1, 1:1 and 1:2 against 344 MDRO clinical isolates, including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (n=58), ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=58), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (n=57), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=49) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (n=122), were measured.

Results

Combined treatment with sulbactam and cefoperazone resulted in decreased MIC₅₀ values across all MDROs, as well as decreases in most MIC₉₀ values, except for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (MIC₉₀ values remained >64 mg/L). Susceptibility rates of treatment with cefoperazone alone against all MDROs were much lower than that of cefoperazone-sulbactam combination (all P<0.05), except in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. Additionally, the susceptibility rate gradually increased as the ratio of cefoperazone-sulbactam was adjusted from 2:1 to 1:1 and to 1:2 for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. There were no significant ratio-dependent changes in susceptibility rates with cefoperazone-sulbactam in carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa.

Conclusion

Adding sulbactam enhances cefoperazone activity against most MDROs excluding carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, and the activity of cefoperazone-sulbactam against these MDROs is greatest at a ratio of 1:2, followed by ratios of 1:1 and 2:1.

Synergy effect of meropenem-based combinations against Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The main objective of our meta-analysis was to examine the in vitro synergistic effect of meropenem-based combination therapies against Acinetobacter baumannii through a systematic review of the existing literature.

METHODS

An extensive search was performed with no restrictions on date of publication, language, and publication type. Our study evaluated the main conclusions drawn from various studies describing the synergistic activity of combination therapies in vitro.

RESULTS

In this review, 56 published studies were included. Our report included data on 20 types of antibiotics combined with meropenem in 1,228 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. In time-kill studies, meropenem combined with polymyxin B and rifampicin showed synergy rates of 98.3% (95% CI, 83.7%-100.0%) and 89.4% (95% CI, 57.2%-100.0%), respectively, for Acinetobacter baumannii, modest synergy rates were found for meropenem combined with several antibiotics such as colistin and sulbactam, and no synergy effect was displayed in the combination of meropenem and ciprofloxacin, whereas in checkerboard method, the synergy rates of polymyxin B and rifampicin were 37.0% (95% CI, 0.00%-100.0%) and 56.3% (95% CI, 8.7%-97.8%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We found that time-kill studies generally identified the greatest synergy, while checkerboard and Etest methods yielded relatively poor synergy rates. Further well-designed in vivo studies should be carried out to confirm these findings.

Interim Study: Comparison Of Safety And Efficacy of Levofloxacin Plus Colistin Regimen With Levofloxacin Plus High Dose Ampicillin/Sulbactam Infusion In Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Due To Multi Drug Resistant Acinetobacter

Due to the emerging antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter, which is the leading cause of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critically ill patients, there is an urgent need for studies comparing various antibiotic regimens for its treatment. In this single blinded randomized clinical trial, adult patients with VAP due to multi drug resistant Acinetobacter (MDRA), were randomly assigned to receive 9×10⁹ unit loading dose of colistin followed by 4.5×10⁹ unit intravenously twice daily plus 750 mg intravenous levofloxacin daily or continuous infusion of ampicillin/sulbactam, 24g daily plus 750mg IV levofloxacin daily. Dose and dosing interval were adjusted according to serum creatinine levels during the study. Clinical and microbiological cure, inflammatory biomarkers, and possible adverse effects were recorded in participants. Twenty-nine patients were recruited (14 in colistin and 15 in ampicillin/sulbactam groups). Three patients were excluded in each group. Clinical response occurred in 3 (27%) and 10 (83%) in colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam arms, respectively (P = 0.007). Nephrotoxicity happened in 6 (54%) and 1 (8%) of cases in colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam groups, (P = 0.016). 14-day and 28-day survival rate were significantly higher in ampicillin-sulbactam group compared to colistin arm with P values of 0.002 and 0.049, respectively. This study revealed that levofloxacin plus high dose ampicillin/sulbactam as continuous infusion is more effective than levofloxacin plus colistin in patients with MDR Acinetobacter VAP with significantly lower risk of nephrotoxicity.

Antibiotic resistance of pathogenic Acinetobacter species and emerging combination therapy

The increasing antibiotic resistance of Acinetobacter species in both natural and hospital environments has become a serious problem worldwide in recent decades. Because of both intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance (AMR) against last-resort antibiotics such as carbapenems, novel therapeutics are urgently required to treat Acinetobacter-associated infectious diseases. Among the many pathogenic Acinetobacter species, A. baumannii has been reported to be resistant to all classes of antibiotics and contains many AMR genes, such as bla _ADC (Acinetobacter-derived cephalosporinase). The AMR of pathogenic Acinetobacter species is the result of several different mechanisms, including active efflux pumps, mutations in antibiotic targets, antibiotic modification, and low antibiotic membrane permeability. To overcome the limitations of existing drugs, combination theraphy that can increase the activity of antibiotics should be considered in the treatment of Acinetobacter infections. Understanding the molecular mechanisms behind Acinetobacter AMR resistance will provide vital information for drug development and therapeutic strategies using combination treatment. Here, we summarize the classic mechanisms of Acinetobacter AMR, along with newly-discovered genetic AMR factors and currently available antimicrobial adjuvants that can enhance drug efficacy in the treatment of A. baumannii infections.