Efficacy of Leuprorelide acetate (Eligard®) in daily practice in Brazil: a retrospective study with depot formulations in patients with prostate cancer

Rise of implantable drugs: A chronicle of breakthroughs in drug delivery systems

In recent years, implantable drug delivery systems (IDDSs) have undergone significant advancements because they offer many advantages to patients and health care professionals. Miniaturization has reduced the size of these devices, making them less invasive and easier to implant. Remote control provides more precise medication delivery and dosage. Biodegradable implants are an additional advancement in implantable drug delivery systems that eliminate the need for surgical removal. Smart implants can monitor a patient's condition and adjust their drug doses. Long-acting implants also provide sustained drug delivery for months or even years, eliminating the need for regular medication dosing, and wireless power and data transmission technology enables the use of devices that are more comfortable and less invasive. These innovations have enhanced patient outcomes by enabling more precise administration, sustained drug delivery, and improved health care monitoring. With continued research and development, it is anticipated that IDDSs will become more effective and provide patients with improved health outcomes. This review categorizes and discusses the benefits and limitations of recent novel IDDSs for their potential therapeutic use.

Construction and evaluation of a phospholipid-based phase transition in situ gel system for brexpiprazole

The objective of this study was to develop phospholipid-based injectable phase transition in situ gels (PTIGs) for the sustained release of Brexpiprazole (Brex). Phospholipid (Lipoid S100, S100) and stearic acid (SA) were used as the gel matrix which was dissolved in biocompatible solvent medium-chain triglyceride (MCT), N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), and ethanol to obtain PTIGs solution. The Brex PTIG showed a solution condition of low viscosity in vitro and was gelatinized in situ in vivo after subcutaneous injection. Both in vitro release assay and in vivo pharmacokinetics study in SD rats displayed that Brex in PTIGs could achieve a sustained release, compared with brexpiprazole solution (Brex-Sol) or brexpiprazole suspension (Brex-Sus). The Brex-PTIGs had good degradability and biocompatibility in vivo with rare inflammation at the injection site. Among the three Brex-PTIG formulations, Brex-PTIG-3 with the SA in the formulation had the greatest gelation viscosity, the lowest initial release rate, and the most stable release profile with sustained release of up to 60 days. The above results indicated that, as a novel drug delivery system, the Brex-PTIGs offered a new option for the clinical treatment of patients with schizophrenia.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of the new prolonged-release leuprorelin acetate microspheres for injection compared with Enantone® in healthy Chinese male volunteers

PURPOSE

To compare the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the new prolonged-release leuprorelin acetate microspheres for injection (3.75 mg) with the reference product Enantone® (3.75 mg).

METHOD

48 healthy male volunteers were enrolled and randomly received a single 3.75 mg dose of the test drug or Enantone®.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in C_max, AUC_0-t and AUC_0-48 between the test group and reference group (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals of the two groups were 87.49%~112.74%, 97.15%~154.25%, and 80.85%~109.01%, respectively. Twenty-eight days after administration, both groups reached 100.0% castration level; there was no difference in the time from administration to reaching castration level between the two groups (P > 0.05); However, the difference between the two groups in the duration of castration level was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no major or serious adverse events, and the severity was mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

The pharmacokinetic characteristics of leuprorelin in two groups were consistent. The two groups exhibited similar inhibitory effects on testosterone and more subjects in the test group maintained a longer castration time than those in the reference group.