Saprochaete clavata invasive infection: characterization, antifungal susceptibility, and biofilm evaluation of a rare yeast isolated in Brazil

Validation of Lyophilized Human Fecal Microbiota for the Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Pilot Study with Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of a Middle-Income Country-Promicrobioma Project

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) represents a prevalent and potentially severe health concern linked to the usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The aim of this study was to evaluate a new lyophilized product based on human fecal microbiota for transplant, including cost-benefit analysis in the treatment of recurrent or refractory CDI.

METHODS

The product for fecal microbiota transplant was obtained from two donors. Microbiological, viability, and genomic analysis were evaluated. After validation, a clinical pilot study including recurrent or refractory CDI with 24 patients was performed. Clinical response and 4-week recurrence were the outcome. Cost-benefit analysis compared the fecal microbiota transplant with conventional retreatment with vancomycin or metronidazole.

RESULTS

The microbiota for transplant presented significant bacterial viability, with and adequate balance of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The clinical response with the microbiota transplant was 92%. In financial terms, estimated expenditure for CDI solely related to recurrence, based on stochastic modeling, totals USD 222.8 million per year in Brazil.

CONCLUSIONS

The lyophilized human fecal microbiota for transplant is safe and can be an important step for a new product with low cost, even with genomic sequencing. Fecal microbiota transplantation emerges as a more cost-effective alternative compared to antimicrobials in the retreatment of CDI.

Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces: identification, virulence factors, and antifungal susceptibility of a challenging rare yeast

Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces is among rare yeasts which might emerge as causes of breakthrough infections and nosocomial outbreaks. Identification to the species level might be a challenge in clinical laboratories. Data on virulence factors are scarce and antifungal susceptibility testing methodology is not definite. The aim of this study was to confirm species identification of clinical Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces isolates, find out their virulence factors, and obtain antifungal minimum inhibitory concentrations with two reference methods. Of the 57 isolates included, 54 were Saprochaete capitata and four were Saprochaete clavata as identified by ID32C, MALDI-TOF MS, and sequencing. When tested using phenotypic methods, all isolates were negative for coagulase, hemolysis, acid proteinase, and phospholipase, 56.1% were positive for esterase, and 19.3% had intermediate surface hydrophobicity. All isolates formed biofilms, with 40.4% of the isolates producing more biomass than biofilm-positive reference strain Candida albicans MYA-274. Antifungal susceptibility testing needed an adjusted spectrophotometric inoculum than recommended in reference methods for Candida/Cryptococcus. In conclusion, Saprochaete/Magnusiomyces species could be identified using methods available in the clinical laboratories. Despite the disadvantages of the phenotypic methods, esterase positivity was observed for the first time. A high biomass production was observed in biofilms. The need for standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing was brought to attention.