Correlation between the water drinking test and modified diurnal tension curve in untreated glaucomatous eyes

Assessing the value of the water drinking test in glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) parameters derived from the water drinking test (WDT) and diurnal IOP monitoring, and evaluates the reproducibility of the WDT and its association with future glaucomatous visual field (VF) loss. A literature search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from inception to 31 March 2023. Cohort, cross-sectional and observational studies reporting WDT results in glaucoma patients were included. Meta analysis with random-effect model was performed using "metafor" package in R version 3.2.1. 641 studies were identified on initial literature search. 38 studies (2479 subjects) were included in final analysis. Meta-analytic estimates of 5 studies (310 subjects) found strong positive correlation in peak IOP between the WDT and diurnal IOP monitoring (r = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.75, 1.08, p < 0.0001). However, there was only weak positive correlation for IOP fluctuation between both methods (r = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.06,0.47, p < 0.0001). Meta-analytic estimates of 3 studies (189 subjects) suggested a trend of the diurnal peak IOP being lower than that derived from the WDT (MD = -2.37 mmHg, 95% Limit of Agreement (LOA) =-5.58,0.84, p = 0.147). Two studies found that a higher WDT peak IOP was associated with greater future VF progression. Two studies demonstrated good reproducibility in peak IOP measurements for WDTs conducted across different days. In conclusion, there was a strong positive correlation between IOP peak measurements from the WDT and diurnal IOP monitoring in glaucoma patients. The WDT peak IOP demonstrated good reproducibility and may be associated with greater future VF progression.

Comparison of intraocular pressure profiles during the water drinking test and the modified diurnal tension curve

OBJECTIVES

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) during the water drinking test (WDT) and modified diurnal tension curve (mDTC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients, using multimodal, observer-masked tonometry.

METHODS

Open-angle glaucoma subjects were prospectively enroled, excluding those who had undergone glaucoma filtration or laser surgery. Two-hourly mDTC Goldmann applanation (GAT) and rebound tonometry (RT) was performed between 8:00 and 16:00, and every 15 min for 45 min after ingestion of 800mls of water. Blood pressure, heart rate, pupillometry measurements, and optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) were also recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-two subjects' right eyes were included. 48% were using topical glaucoma medication. Mean baseline IOP was 14.9 ± 4.52 mmHg, with mean visual field mean deviation (±SD) -5.05 ± 5.45 dB. Strong association was found between maximum IOP during mDTC and WDT (r = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.95 p < 0.0001) with agreement (mDTC-WDT) bias -0.82 mmHg, 95% LoA -1.46 to -0.18. During the WDT, mean systolic blood pressure (±SD) increased from 140.0 ± 20.0 to 153.3 ± 24.0 mmHg (p < 0.0001), mean heart rate ( ± SD) reduced from 69.5 ± 11.3 bpm to 63.6 ± 10.0 bpm (p < 0.0001), and temporal iridocorneal angle increased from 29.2 ± 6.0° to 29.6 ± 5.2° (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

This study presents repeated, observer-masked IOP data showing strong correlation between maximum IOP during mDTC and WDT using multimodal tonometry. This supports WDT as a meaningful alternative to mDTC when investigating diurnal IOP characteristics in clinic, with reduced time requirements and associated costs.

The Effect of the Water Drinking Test on Ocular Parameters and Choroidal Thickness in Glaucoma Suspects

Background and objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effects of the water drinking test (WDT) on several systemic and ocular parameters, including choroidal thickness, which was assessed through optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), in glaucoma suspects. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 eyes from 20 glaucoma suspects without any systemic or ocular diseases were included in this prospective observational study. All the participants undertook the WDT, which required the drinking of 1 L of table water in 5 min. The outcome measures included IOP, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), mean ocular perfusion pressure (MOPP), ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), and subfoveal and peripapillary choroidal thickness, which were assessed at baseline and at four 15 min intervals after the WDT. Generalized least squares models and mixed model analyses that take into account repeated measurements were used to assess the changes over time of these parameters. Results: All the ocular and systemic parameters showed statistically significant changes at all time points compared to baseline apart from choroidal thickness. The peak changes were an IOP of 20.1 mmHg versus 17.3 mmHg at 45 min, an SBP of 137.6 mmHg versus 125 mmHg at 30 min, a DBP of 95.9 mmHg versus 85.7 mmHg at 15 min, and an MOP of 53.51 mmHg versus 48.89 mmHg at 15 min. Conclusions: Despite elevations in IOP and significant changes in all the assessed systemic parameters, the WDT was not associated with changes in choroidal thickness in glaucoma suspects.

Intraocular Peak Pressure in Patients under Treatment with Fixed Combination of Bimatoprost/ Timolol/ Brimonidine once Daily versus Twice Daily

PRECIS

We investigate the efficacy of triple-fixed-combination of Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol once and twice a day, demonstrating higher intraocular pressure reduction with once-a-day use, and discuss possible implications based on previous literature.

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of fixed combination bimatoprost-timolol-brimonidine (Triplenex ®) instilled once-daily with twice-daily in primary open-angle glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Randomized clinical trial at a public eye care institution. Thirty patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were followed-up for three-months. The right and left eyes of these patients were randomly assigned to once-daily, (10:00 PM) or twice-daily, (10:00 AM; 10:00 PM) regimens of fixed combination bimatoprost-timolol-brimonidine. Intraocular pressure peaks were obtained with the water drinking test before the introduction of this medication (basal WDT0), one month (WDT 1), 2 months (WDT2) and 3 months (WDT3) after starting the use of the fixed combination of Bimatoprost/ Timolol/ Brimonidine (Triplenex®). Variation from peak intraocular pressure at WDT3 to peak at WDT0 was compared within groups of two versus once daily regimen.

RESULTS

Sixty eyes of 30 patients (age 70.67±9.70▒y) were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean reduction in peak intraocular pressure from WDT0 to WDT3 was 6.1±6.1▒mmHg (30.5%) in the eyes receiving one drop per day and 4.3 ±5.7▒mmHg (21.5%) in the eyes receiving two drops per day (P=0.023). Mean reduction in peak intraocular pressure considering all WDT was also higher in the group with once-a-day treatment (5.90±6.03▒mmHg vs. 4.46±4.28▒mmHg, P=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Fixed combination of bimatoprost 0.01%, brimonidine tartrate 0.15% and timolol maleate 0.5% once-a-day is more effective in reducing peak intraocular pressure as measured by the WDT than twice-a-day dosing.

Duration of the hypotensive effect of prostaglandin analogues measured with the water drinking test in glaucoma patients

OBJECTIVE

To measure the magnitude and duration of the hypotensive effect of two prostaglandin analogues in glaucoma patients using the water drinking test (WDT).

METHODS

Patients received latanoprost or travoprost every 24 h and then every 48 h. Untreated WDT were performed at 7 am and with treatment 12, 36 and 44 h after the last dose; intraocular pressure (IOP) peak, fluctuation and the difference between peak and isolated IOP measurements at consultation times were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-one eyes of 21 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included; 22 eyes received latanoprost, and 19 received travoprost. Mean untreated isolated IOP was 17.20 standard deviation (S.D.) 3.73 and 16.95 S.D. 2.61 mmHg and peak pressure 22.45 S.D. 2.91 and 21.58 S.D. 3.79 mmHg, for the latanoprost and travoprost groups, respectively. With treatment, peak pressure was reduced by 22.64% and 20.29% at 12 h, 18.44% and 14.64% at 36 h and 16.17% and 14.46% at 44 h, respectively. The fluctuation without treatment was 4.36 and 5.11 mmHg, and with treatment at 12 h was reduced to 2.77 and 2.89 mmHg, increasing again at 36 and 44 h.

CONCLUSIONS

A hypotensive effect was evident up to 44 h after the last dose of latanoprost and travoprost, similar for the two drugs and decreasing over time. IOP fluctuation was only reduced at 12 h.

Effect of combined water drinking test and dark room provocative testing in Caucasian eyes with narrow angles

PURPOSE

To assess the usefulness of water drinking test and dark room provocative testing (WDT + DRPT) in current clinical practice by evaluating input parameters from Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography (SS-OCT) images, and to determine if clinical factors like axial length, central endothelial cell count (CECC) and retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) thickness are associated with a positive WDT + DRPT.

METHODS

SS-OCT examination was performed in consecutive subjects presenting as new patients in the outpatient clinic aged > 40 years. If at least one eye met the inclusion criteria (anterior chamber angles <20° and anterior chamber depth < 2.5 mm on SS-OCT), subjects were included in this study and WDT + DRPT was carried out. The eye with the smallest angle was analysed. The difference in parameters between eyes with a positive (≥8 mmHg) and negative (<8 mmHg) increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) after WDT + DRPT were statistically analysed. Second, the correlation between IOP increase after WDT + DRPT and anterior chamber angle parameters (RNFL thickness, CECC and axial length) was studied.

RESULTS

A total of 95 subjects with a mean age of 64 years were included. There was an association between IOP increase after WDT + DRPT and anterior chamber angle characteristics, however this was not of clinical significance. No positive results after WDT + DRPT were found in patients with anterior chamber angles ≥ 20°.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings indicate that this combined provocative test has no definite correlative or predictive value in angle closure disease. Further, the test is not useful in predicting early diagnosis or possible CECC or RNFL loss.

Peak Intraocular Pressure Time during Water Drinking Test and Its Relationship with Glaucoma Severity

Purpose

To investigate the association between the time of occurrence of intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks during the water-drinking test (WDT) and visual field damage in a cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.

Methods

In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 98 eyes from 49 consecutive POAG patients were followed in a referral clinical practice. The relationship between the time when IOP peaks occurred during the WDT and the visual field mean deviation (MD) assessed with 24-2 visual field was tested with mixed-effects models.

Results

MD value was significantly associated with the time of IOP peak occurrence (P = 0.020) when adjusting for the number of medications, but not with the IOP peak values (P = 0.238).

Conclusion

The time of IOP peaks occurrence during the WDT was associated with glaucoma severity among treated POAG patients.

Short-Time Changes of Intraocular Pressure and Biomechanics of the Anterior Segment of the Eye during Water Drinking Test in Patients with XEN GelStent

Purpose: Little is known about short-term changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) following minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries, such as post-XEN GelStent implantation. Although the importance of corneal biomechanics in glaucoma diagnostics has been reported, little work has been conducted on postoperative description of changes when the structure of the anterior segment is altered. The aim of presented study was to evaluate the changes in the biomechanical parameters of the anterior segment of the post-XEN GelStent implantation eyes. Patients and Methods: This investigator-initiated, open-label, prospective, single-center study recruited patients. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after XEN GelStent implantation versus matched POAG controls (considered as control group/CG) treated pharmacologically were screened. Water loading was conducted using 10 mL of water per kilogram of body weight for ≤5 min. Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were performed before water loading and after every 15 min up to 1 h. Results: The water drinking test (WDT) was positive in 3.7% (1 out of 27) of patients in the post-XEN group compared with 22.7% (5 out of 22) of patients in the control group (CG; p < 0.05). Mean fluctuations in GAT during the WDT were higher in the CG group (3.6 ± 2.5 mmHg vs. 2.9 ± 1.3 mmHg, p < 0.001). CRF and CH changed significantly only in the post-XEN group. The mean peak of CH and CRF occurred at 15 and 30 min of the test in the post-XEN group (p = 0.001). Conclusion: WDT is important to assess the ability of compensation mechanisms to reduce fluctuations in IOP after water upload. The relationship between biomechanics of the anterior segment and glaucoma may have substantial impact on surgical outcome evaluation.

Retinal microvascular density modifications during the water drinking test

PURPOSE

The water drinking test (WDT) is a well-known stress test that increases intraocular pressure (IOP) momentarily and can indicate risk of glaucoma progression. This study focuses on correlating changes in the retinal microvascular plexus with the WDT in young healthy subjects.

METHODS

A total of 20 eyes of 20 healthy young subjects (mean age 24.37 ± 2.17 years) were included in this study. In our protocol, WDT consisted of drinking 1 L of water within 5 min. Outcome measures in this prospective observational study were mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), IOP, and retinal vessel density of both superficial and deep macular retina using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), which were assessed before water ingestion and four times after at 15-min intervals. OCTA images were later quantified by fractal analysis (box counting [D_box]). One-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the effects of WDT on each of the parameters.

RESULTS

The WDT resulted in significant peak changes of the following parameters compared to baseline: IOP: 15.63 ± 3.37 versus 18.38 ± 4.53 mmHg at 30 min, p < 0.001; HR: 75.74 ± 12.23 versus 64.95 ± 11.37 bpm at 15 min, p < 0.001; deep retinal vessel density 1.758 ± 0.14 versus 1.749 ± 0.16 at 15 min, p = 0.040.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides IOP elevation and systemic effects in HR, WDT is associated with temporary modifications of the deep vascular plexus in young healthy subjects.

Comparison of intraocular pressure variability detected by day diurnal variation to that evoked by water drinking

Purpose

To determine correlation and agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) peak and fluctuations detected by day diurnal variation (day DVT) to that after the water-drinking test (WDT).

Methods

Patients (18-80 years) with glaucoma, suspects, and ocular hypertension (OHT) were enrolled. IOP readings were taken on applanation tonometer, at 2-h intervals, from 8 AM to 3 PM (DVT). 3 PM IOP served as WDT baseline. Patients consumed water (10 mL/kg) in 5-15 min, at 3 PM, after they fluid fasted for 2 h. IOP was recorded every 15 min, from 3.30 to 4.30 PM.

Results

A total of 200 eyes (100 patients) were included. 58.5% were established glaucoma, 32% suspects, 9.5% OHT. Correlation between mean and peak IOP by WDT and day DVT was strong and significant (r = 0.89, P < 0.00; r = 0.73, P < 0.00) while it was weak for fluctuation (r = 0.12, P < 0.07). Agreement on Bland and Altman plots was limited for mean IOP and poor for peak and fluctuations.

Conclusion

An exaggerated WDT response may indicate a compromised outflow facility and warrant close patient monitoring but the WDT cannot substitute day DVT in our clinical practice.

Correlation and Agreement Between Water Drinking Test and Modified Diurnal Tension Curve in Untreated Glaucoma Patients in Nigeria

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation and agreement between intraocular pressure (IOP) parameters evaluated by the modified diurnal tension curve (mDTC) and the water drinking test (WDT) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in an indigenous African population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective, interventional, comparative study of 50 newly diagnosed, previously untreated primary open-angle glaucoma patients at the out-patient clinic of the Eleta Eye Institute, Ibadan. A series of IOP measurements were taken 2 hourly (from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM) for the mDTC, using Goldmann applanation tonometer. The WDT was performed thereafter. The patients drank 800 mL of water within 5 minutes, and another series of IOP measurements were taken every 15 minutes for a duration of 1 hour from the moment water was fully ingested. Both the mDTC and the WDT were performed on the same day. IOP peak, mean, and IOP fluctuations were estimated from the data collected. Comparison between the mDTC and the WDT was performed using the paired Student T test for means, Pearson correlation analysis for correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis for agreement.

RESULTS

Estimated IOP parameters were significantly higher for the WDT than for the mDTC. The average peak IOP was 27.8±4.0 mm Hg during the WDT and 24.9±3.1 mm Hg during the mDTC (P<0.001). The average mean IOP was 25.8±3.6 mm Hg during the WDT and 22.3±2.4 mm Hg during the mDTC (P<0.001). The average IOP fluctuation was higher (6.6±2.9 mm Hg) during the WDT compared with 4.7±2.0 mm Hg during the mDTC. The mean and peak IOPs were strongly correlated between the mDTC (r=0.729, P<0.001) and the WDT (r=0.658, P<0.001). IOP fluctuation, however, showed weak correlation between the mDTC and the WDT (r=0.258, P=0.709).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a strong positive correlation between IOP parameters (peak and mean IOP) estimated from the WDT and the mDTC. The peak and mean IOP can be estimated from the WDT, which is quicker, compared with the mDTC. This is more relevant in low resource settings with limited personnel, time, and resource constraints. In addition, higher IOP values were obtained from the WDT compared with the mDTC, and therefore could serve as a useful practical way to determine target peak in order to optimize IOP control in glaucoma patients.

Comparison between provocative test-based and long-term intraocular pressure parameters in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

To compare provocative test-based and long-term intraocular pressure variation parameters in patients with stable open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was carried out in which stable open-angle glaucoma patients (⩾3 years of follow-up without any changes on current medical regimen) were consecutively enrolled. All patients were submitted to a water-drinking test. Long-term intraocular pressure parameters were obtained from isolated intraocular pressure measurements from each visit (⩾5 visits). We investigated the correlation and agreement between the following water-drinking test and long-term intraocular pressure parameters: mean, peak, and fluctuation. In addition, the percentage of eyes with significant intraocular pressure peaks during the water-drinking test (defined as a difference ⩾25% between water-drinking test intraocular pressure peak and mean long-term intraocular pressure) was assessed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three eyes from 63 open-angle glaucoma patients (mean age, 60.7 ± 11.8 years) were included. Mean and water-drinking test intraocular pressure peak correlated significantly with mean (r = 0.67) and maximum long-term intraocular pressure (r = 0.52), respectively (p < 0.01). The correlation between water-drinking test intraocular pressure fluctuation and long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation was not significant (p = 0.45). Limits of agreement from Bland-Altman plots exceeded the maximum allowed difference between methods (3 mm Hg) for all the intraocular pressure parameters analyzed, suggesting poor agreement between water-drinking test-derived and long-term intraocular pressure values. Overall, significant water-drinking test intraocular pressure peaks were observed in 39.7% of these eyes with stable open-angle glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

Although some water-drinking test-based and long-term intraocular pressure parameters correlate significantly, water-drinking test results may not reflect the long-term intraocular pressure profile of stable open-angle glaucoma patients, as their agreement is poor. Many of these patients may experience significant water-drinking test intraocular pressure peaks, despite long-standing stable disease and unchanged medical regimen.

Water-drinking Test and Pharmacologic Mydriasis as Provocative Tests in Primary Angle Closure Suspects

Purpose

To compare the water-drinking test (WDT) and pharmacologic mydriasis as provocative tests in patients with primary angle closure suspect (PACS).

Methods

This observational non-randomized comparative study evaluated changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) in 21 patients with PACS who underwent pharmacologic mydriasis and compared it with IOP changes in 26 patients given the WDT. Ocular biometric and anterior chamber parameters were also assessed. Tests were repeated on the same patient two weeks after performing laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI).

Results

The mean age ± standard deviation was 60 ± 7 and 57 ± 9 years in the mydriasis and WDT groups, respectively (P = 0.201). Before LPI, both provocative tests were associated with a significant increase in IOP (mydriasis: 15.1 ± 3.1 to 16.6 ± 3.5 mmHg, P = 0.025; WDT: 16.2 ± 2.8 to 18.5 ± 3.3 mmHg, P < 0.001). However, the IOP changes were not statistically different between groups (P = 0.102). After LPI, only the WDT group showed a continued significant IOP elevation after the test (mydriasis: 16.4 ± 3.3 to 16.7 ± 3.5 mmHg, P = 0.569; WDT: 14.9 ± 3.0 to 17.8 ± 4.1 mmHg, P < 0.001). The post-test IOP change was significantly greater in the WDT than in the mydriasis group (3.0 versus 0.3 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.002). Step-wise multiple regression analysis verified the type of provocative test as the only independent factor affecting the post-test IOP change after LPI (regression coefficient: 2.664; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

Pharmacologic mydriasis and the WDT had similar IOP elevation before LPI, but after LPI, IOP elevation was much greater in the WDT group.

Predictive Value of the Water Drinking Test and the Risk of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression

PURPOSE

The purpose of this is to test the hypothesis the intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks during a stress test [the water drinking test (WDT)] can estimate the risk of future visual field progression in treated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Design: Prospective, longitudinal study.

SETTING

Clinical practice.

STUDY POPULATION

Treated POAG patients whose IOP was ≤18 mm Hg and who had no IOP-lowering interventions between the date of the WDT and the last eligible visual field.

INTERVENTION

At baseline examination, patients underwent the WDT and were then followed at regular intervals with office-based IOP measurements and visual field testing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Cox-proportional hazards survival analysis testing the predictive value of IOP peaks during the WDT versus IOP measurements during office hours on visual field progression.

RESULTS

A total of 144 eyes of 96 patients with baseline visual field damage ranging from mild to severe followed for a mean of 28 months were analyzed. In the multivariable analysis adjusting for potential confounders, higher IOP peaks during the WDT were predictive of future visual field progression (hazard ratio=1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.21; P=0.013). The average and peak IOP during office hours over the same follow-up period were not significantly associated with progression (P=0.651 and 0.569, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

IOP peaks detected with the WDT were predictive of future visual field progression in a treated POAG population. This stress test could be a useful tool for risk assessment in daily practice.

The Water-Drinking Test Revisited: An Analysis of Test Results in Subjects with Glaucoma

PURPOSE

The Water-Drinking Test (WDT) has been shown to predict the diurnal IOP change. This study evaluates the factors that may affect the WDT results.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 203 glaucoma patients who had undergone trabeculectomy (53) or tube surgery (31), or had a medically controlled open-angle (82) or closed-angle (37) glaucoma. IOP was measured at baseline and then every 15 minutes over a one-hour period after drinking water. The main outcome measures were IOP change (increase in IOP from baseline) at all measurement time points, IOP peak (highest IOP after drinking water), IOP fluctuation (difference between IOP peak and baseline), and assessing the association of these IOPs with a patient's demographic and management modalities.

RESULTS

The mean age of the participants was 54±18 years, and 113 (56%) were male. Female patients showed greater IOP fluctuation than males (7.28 vs. 5.92 mm Hg; P=0.016), and a greater IOP peak (22.7 vs. 20.1 mm Hg; P=0.001). The observed associations between gender and IOP changes were only significant in <50 years. IOP at 60 minutes was greater in tube than trabeculectomy (5.6 vs. 3.1 mm Hg; P=0.007). The number of topical medications showed a direct independent association with IOP changes (P<0.001). Compared to other classes of topical medications, latanoprost showed lower WDT-IOP profile (P=0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

WDT-IOP change was diminished in subjects on latanoprost, and was greater in females <50 years, and those on greater number of medications.

Applications of the water drinking test in glaucoma management

Intraocular pressure (IOP) peaks and means have been considered important factors for glaucoma onset and progression. However, peak IOP detection depends only on appropriated IOP checks at office visits, whereas the mean IOP requires longitudinal IOP data collection and may be affected by the interval between visits. Also, IOP peak assessment is necessary to verify if the peak pressure of a given patient is in target range, to evaluate glaucoma suspect risk, the efficacy of hypotensive drugs and to detect early loss of IOP control. The water-drinking test has gained significant attention in recent years as an important tool to evaluate IOP peaks and instability. The main objective of this review was to present new findings and to discuss the applicability of the water-drinking test in glaucoma management.

Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty Reduces Intraocular Pressure Peak in Response to the Water Drinking Test

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) peak and fluctuation induced by the water drinking test (WDT) in patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

METHODS

Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension underwent the WDT before and after SLT within a 12-month period. No other changes to therapeutic regimen were permitted. IOP was measured with a Goldmann applanation tonometer at baseline and every 15 minutes for 45 minutes following a fluid challenge of 800 mL over 15 minutes. Baseline, peak, and percentage fluctuation in IOP from baseline were compared using a repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni adjustment.

RESULTS

Twenty eyes from 20 patients were included in this study. The median patient age was 73±15 years (interquartile range) and 70% of patients were female. Ten eyes (50%) had a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma and 10 eyes had ocular hypertension. Following SLT there was a statistically significant reduction in mean baseline IOP from 16.9±2.4 to 14.2±2.3 mm Hg (P<0.001), peak IOP from 21.9±3.7 to 16.9±3.1 mm Hg (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension treated with SLT have significantly reduced peak IOPs and fluctuation in IOP in response to the WDT.

Intraocular Pressure Characteristics of Exfoliative Glaucoma and Exfoliation Syndrome as Determined With the Water Drinking Test

PURPOSE

To investigate the intraocular pressure (IOP) characteristics of patients with exfoliation glaucoma (XFG) and exfoliation syndrome (XFS) during the water drinking test (WDT).

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study undertaken at an academic setting. Consecutive patients with XFG whose office IOP levels were <21 mm Hg, normotensive XFS patients, and control subjects underwent WDT, which involved ingestion of 1 L of water within 5 minutes. The IOP was measured before and 4 times after water ingestion at 15-minute intervals. Maximum IOP (IOPmax), mean IOP (IOPmean), IOP increase (IOPΔ) from baseline IOP to IOPmax, and percentage of IOP fluctuation (IOPfluct) during the WDT were compared across groups. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

The age, gender ratios, visual acuity level, central corneal thickness, and office IOP levels were similar between the 3 groups. As compared with patients with XFS and controls, XFG patients revealed significantly higher values for all IOP measurements at 15 minutes intervals as well as IOPmax (25.1±4.0 mm Hg, 18.7±2.8 mm Hg, 18.6±2.5mm Hg; P<0.001), IOPmean (22.6±3.3mm Hg, 17.2±2.6 mm Hg, 17.2±2.4 mm Hg; P<0.001), IOPΔ (9.2±3.4 mm Hg, 4.4±2.1 mm Hg, 3.7±1.5 mm Hg; P<0.001), and IOPfluct (60.1±24.0%, 33.4±20.0%, 25.7±11.3%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Medically treated XFG patients, but not XFS subjects, reveal significant IOP elevations during WDT indicative of impaired trabecular outflow facility.

Reproducibility of the water drinking test

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the reproducibility of the water drinking test in determining intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation. It has been suggested that there is limited agreement between the water drinking test and diurnal tension curve. This may be because it has only been compared with a 10-hour modified diurnal tension curve, missing 70% of IOP peaks that occurred during night.

METHODS

This was a prospective, analytical and comparative study that assesses the correlation, agreement, sensitivity and specificity of the water drinking test.

RESULTS

The correlation between the water drinking test and diurnal tension curve was significant and strong (r=0.93, Confidence interval 95% between 0.79 and 0.96, p<01). A moderate agreement was observed between these measurements (pc=0.93, Confidence interval 95% between 0.87 and 0.95, p<.01). The agreement was within±2mmHg in 89% of the tests.

DISCUSSION

Our study found a moderate agreement between the water drinking test and diurnal tension curve, in contrast with the poor agreement found in other studies, possibly due to the absence of nocturnal IOP peaks.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the water drinking test could be used to determine IOP peaks, as well as for determining baseline IOP.

Reproducibility of the water drinking test in treated glaucomatous patients

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation elicited during the water drinking test in treated glaucomatous patients with a long follow-up interval.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary care practice.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four treated primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

METHODS

All patients underwent the water drinking test performed in two consecutive visits without any change in the therapeutic regimen. The mean interval between tests was 4.85 (range: 3-6) months. Reproducibility of peak and fluctuation during the water drinking test was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation measured between two consecutive tests.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraclass correlation and agreement of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation between visits.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline intraocular pressure values (mean ± standard deviation, 11.73 ± 2.36 and 11.61 ± 2.71 mmHg; P = 0.72) and peaks (14.55 ± 3.41 and 15.02 ± 3.66 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.163) detected during the water drinking test between the first and second visits. There was also no significant difference between the average intraocular pressure fluctuation values (2.82 ± 1.99 and 3.41 ± 2.54 mmHg, respectively; P = 0.135). Intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation presented intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.85 (P < 0.001) and 0.50 (P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate excellent reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks during the water drinking test. Intraocular pressure fluctuation did not reveal good reproducibility, though. These results emphasize the applicability of this test to assess treatment efficacy in daily practice and interventional studies.

Reproducibility of intraocular pressure peak and fluctuation of the water-drinking test

BACKGROUND

The water-drinking test has been used as a stress test to evaluate the drainage system of the eye. However, in order to be clinically applicable,a test must provide reproducible results with consistent measurements. This study was performed to verify the reproducibility of intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water-drinking test in patients with ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

DESIGN

A prospective analysis of patients in a tertiary care unit for glaucoma treatment.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment.

METHODS

The water-drinking test was performed in 2 consecutive days by the same examiners in patients not under treatment. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Peak and fluctuation of intraocular pressure obtained with the water-drinking test were analysed for reproducibility.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight eyes from 24 ocular hypertension and 64 open-angle glaucoma patients not under treatment were evaluated. Test and retest intraocular pressure peak values were 28.38 ± 4.64 and 28.38 ± 4.56 mmHg, respectively (P = 1.00). Test and retest intraocular pressure fluctuation values were 5.75 ± 3.9 and 4.99 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively (P = 0.06). Based on intraclass coefficient, reproducibility was excellent for peak intraocular pressure (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.79) and fair for intraocular pressure fluctuation (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.37).

CONCLUSION

Intraocular pressure peaks detected during the water-drinking test presented excellent reproducibility, whereas the reproducibility of fluctuation was considered fair.

Additive intraocular pressure reduction effect of fixed combination of maleate timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% (Cosopt) on monotherapy with latanoprost (Xalatan) in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a prospective, 4-week, open-label, randomized, controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the additive effect of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination in patients under monotherapy with latanoprost.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, 4-week, randomized, open-label controlled clinical trial, patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, which presented at least 15% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after a minimum period of 15 days of monotherapy with latanoprost and whose IOP level was considered above the established target-IOP level were randomized to receive fixed combination of timolol/dorzolamide twice daily in one of eyes. The fellow eye was kept under monotherapy and was included in the control group. A modified diurnal tension curve (mDTC) followed by the water drinking test were performed in the baseline and week 4 visits to evaluate IOP profile between groups.

RESULTS

Forty-nine per-protocol patients were analyzed. After latanoprost monotherapy run-in period, IOP levels were significantly reduced (P<0.001) in both control and study groups to 15.34+/-2.96 mm Hg and 15.24+/-2.84 mm Hg (30.8% and 32.2% IOP reduction, respectively; P=0.552). At week 4, mean baseline diurnal IOP levels were 15.60+/-3.09 and 14.44+/-3.03 (7.4% difference; P=0.01). Mean baseline IOP modified diurnal tension curve peak after latanoprost run-in period were 17.47+/-3.68 mm Hg and 17.02+/-3.35 mm Hg (control and study eyes, respectively; P=0.530). At week 4 visit, mean water-drinking test peaks were significantly reduced in the study eye group in comparison with the control group: 19.02+/-3.81 mm Hg and 20.39+/-4.19 mm Hg, respectively (6.7% reduction; P=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

In our sample, dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination as add-on therapy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension under monotherapy with latanoprost with IOP already in mid-teens levels may further enhance pressure reduction.

Understanding the mechanism of the water drinking test: the role of fluid challenge volume in patients with medically controlled primary open angle glaucoma

BACKGROUND

To determine whether a 500-mL fluid challenge produces a different intraocular pressure (IOP) response profile compared with a 1000-mL water drinking test (WDT).

METHODS

Prospective, observer-masked, cross-over, observational study. Patients with primary open angle glaucoma were recruited from a private specialist glaucoma practice. One eye of each patient was included. Subjects were randomized to receive either a 500-mL or 1000-mL fluid challenge. Baseline IOP was recorded with a Goldmann applanation tonometer and then every 15 min for 1 h. A second WDT with the alternate volume of water was performed after a minimum washout period of 24 h. Primary statistical analysis was performed using a two-way anova repeated measures of variance with a Bonferroni post-hoc test.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were included in this study. The mean patient age was 67.0 +/- 10.2 (SD) years, and 60% of patients were female. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline IOP between the 500-mL and 1000-mL WDTs (P = 0.11). Both fluid challenge volumes produced a statistically significant rise in IOP from baseline at 15, 30 and 45 min after water ingestion. However the mean maximum increase in IOP was less in the 500-mL WDT (3.3 +/- 1.8 mmHg [23.9%]) compared with the 1000-mL WDT (4.9 +/- 2.3 mmHg [32.5%]; P = 0.0095).

CONCLUSION

The 500-mL WDT may provide an alternative for patients who are unable to tolerate drinking 1000 mL of water. However, because the maximum IOP obtained is less, a 500-mL WDT cannot be used to directly estimate peak diurnal pressure.

Agreement between stress intraocular pressure and long-term intraocular pressure measurements in primary open angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to study the correlation between the intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test and the same parameters observed during long-term follow up.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study enrolled 22 eyes of 22 newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients. After an initial complete ophthalmological examination, patients were started on antiglaucoma medication and returned 4 weeks later to perform the water drinking test. Thereafter,patients were evaluated at least eight times within a period of 6-12 months. The intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking stress test were compared with those observed during regular office visits. Spearman's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman Plots were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 54.3 +/- 8.2 years (+/-SD), 59% were women, and average mean deviation -10.2 +/- 4.5 dB. The mean follow-up period was 8.2 +/- 2.0 months. The average intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation during the water drinking test were 20.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg and 40 +/- 10%, respectively, and 18.1 +/- 2.8 mmHg and 30 +/- 10% during follow up. Spearman's correlation coefficients were significant and strong between the intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test and during the follow-up period (P < 0.001, rho = 0.76 and 0.82,respectively). There was good agreement between the variables.

CONCLUSION

The intraocular pressure peaks and fluctuation detected during the water drinking test showed significant correlation and agreement with the pressures observed during follow-up visits. Stress tests could be used to estimate long-term intraocular pressure variation.