Clinical monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors using the ecarin clotting time

Monitoring Direct Thrombin Inhibitors With Calibrated Diluted Thrombin Time vs Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time in Pediatric Patients

OBJECTIVES

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is the primary test used to monitor intravenous (IV) direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) but has many limitations. The plasma diluted thrombin time (dTT) has shown better correlation with DTI levels than aPTT. This study compared dose-response curves for dTT and aPTT in pediatric patients receiving argatroban and bivalirudin.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric patients treated with argatroban (n = 45) or bivalirudin (n = 14) monitored with dTT and aPTT.

RESULTS

The dTT assay was calibrated to report DTI concentrations in µg/mL for argatroban and bivalirudin with good analytic sensitivity and specificity. The dTT was fivefold more likely to show a stable dose-response slope than the aPTT (P < .0002; odds ratio, 4.9). For patients in whom both dTT and aPTT showed a significant correlation between dose and assay results, dTT had a higher average correlation factor compared with aPTT (P = .007). Argatroban dose-response slopes showed more inter- and intrapatient variation than bivalirudin (dose-response slope coefficient of variation, 132% vs 52%).

CONCLUSIONS

The dTT assay was more likely to show a stable dose response and have a stronger correlation with DTI dose than aPTT. Argatroban shows more variation in dose response than bivalirudin.

"In Less than No Time": Feasibility of Rotational Thromboelastometry to Detect Anticoagulant Drugs Activity and to Guide Reversal Therapy

Anticoagulant drugs (i.e., unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, vitamin K antagonists, and direct oral anticoagulants) are widely employed in preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE), in preventing arterial thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), and in treating acute coronary diseases early. In certain situations, such as bleeding, urgent invasive procedures, and surgical settings, the evaluation of anticoagulant levels and the monitoring of reversal therapy appear essential. Standard coagulation tests (i.e., activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT)) can be normal, and the turnaround time can be long. While the role of viscoelastic hemostatic assays (VHAs), such as rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), has successfully increased over the years in the management of bleeding and thrombotic complications, its usefulness in detecting anticoagulants and their reversal still appears unclear.

Anticoagulation Monitoring Part 1: Warfarin and Parenteral Direct Thrombin Inhibitors

OBJECTIVE:

To review the availability, mechanisms, limitations, and clinical application of point-of-care (POC) devices used in the management of warfarin and parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors.

DATA SOURCES:

Scientific articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966–August 2004), manufacturer Web sites, additional references listed in articles and Web sites, and abstracts from scientific meetings.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION:

English-language literature from clinical trials was reviewed to evaluate the accuracy, reliability, and clinical application of POC monitoring devices.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

The prothrombin time expressed as the international normalized ratio (PT—INR) is a well-established test for monitoring warfarin anticoagulation. Multiple devices are available for POC testing. Because there is no universally accepted standard, the performance of each device is typically tested against a standard test performed in a reference laboratory. Performance of currently available devices, as measured by correlations to a standard reference laboratory PT—INR, may be considered very good and acceptable for use in patient care. Utilization of patient self-testing and patient self-monitoring of warfarin anticoagulation using POC devices is increasing. Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors are typically monitored using a standard laboratory activated partial thromboplastin time. Some research has shown that POC monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors using the ecarin clotting time is helpful for patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, although that test is not readily available.

CONCLUSIONS:

POC testing for anticoagulation therapy has been available for >20 years. Multiple POC devices are available to monitor warfarin. There is some variability in results between devices and between reagents used in the same device. Despite these limitations, POC monitoring of warfarin via the PT—INR is an integral part of clinical practice. Additional research evaluating POC monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors is necessary.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a drug-mediated, prothrombotic disorder caused by immunization against platelet factor 4 (PF4) after complex formation with heparin or other polyanions. After their binding to PF4/heparin complexes on the platelet surface, HIT antibodies are capable of intravascular platelet activation by cross-linking Fcγ receptor IIA leading to a platelet count decrease and/or thrombosis. Diagnosis of HIT is often difficult. This, and the low specificity of the commercially available immunoassays, leads currently to substantial overdiagnosis of HIT. Timing of onset, the moderate nature of thrombocytopenia, and the common concurrence of thrombosis are very important factors, which help to differentiate HIT from other potential causes of thrombocytopenia. A combination of a clinical pretest scoring system and laboratory investigation is usually necessary to diagnose HIT. Although HIT is considered to be a rare complication of heparin treatment, the very high number of hospital inpatients, and increasingly also hospital outpatients receiving heparin, still result in a considerable number of patients developing HIT. If HIT occurs, potentially devastating complications such as life-threatening thrombosis make it one of the most serious adverse drug reactions. If HIT is strongly suspected, all heparin must be stopped and an alternative nonheparin anticoagulant started at a therapeutic dose to prevent thromboembolic complications. However, the nonheparin alternative anticoagulants bear a considerable bleeding risk, especially if given to patients with thrombocytopenia due to other reasons than HIT. While established drugs for HIT are disappearing from the market (lepirudin, danaparoid), bivalirudin, fondaparinux and potentially the new anticoagulants such as dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban provide new treatment options.

Bivalirudin for anticoagulation in children

BACKGROUND

Thromboembolism in children is typically treated with unfractionated heparin (UH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Both rely on antithrombin (AT) for their action. In addition, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious complication of heparin use in children. Bivalirudin or other direct thrombin inhibitors may be a useful alternative to heparins in treating thrombosis in children.

PROCEDURE

We report a retrospective review to assess the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in pediatric patients with thrombosis.

RESULTS

Sixteen children received bivalirudin for thrombosis or prevention of thrombosis at the Children's Hospital of Illinois from January 2005 to January 2007. Patients received a bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion (0.16 +/- 0.07 mg kg(-1) hr(-1)) titrated to 1.5-2.5 times the baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Positive correlation between the bivalirudin average infusion rate and aPTT was observed in twelve patients. Ultrasonographic evidence of thrombus regression was noted at 72 hr in 10 of 10 patients. One patient experienced hematuria after catheterization of the urethra.

CONCLUSION

Bivalirudin was effective and well-tolerated in these patients. Further studies should be conducted to better define safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in pediatric patients.

Direct thrombin inhibitors: pharmacology and clinical relevance

Although heparin has been a cornerstone of treatment for the prevention of thrombosis, it is limited by its adverse effects and unpredictable bioavailability. Direct thrombin inhibitors are a novel class of drugs that have been developed as an effective alternative mode of anticoagulation in patients who suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopaenia, and for the management of thromboembolic disorders and acute coronary syndromes. The main disadvantages of the direct thrombin inhibitors are the lack of an antidote or readily available clinical monitoring. The mechanism of action, the properties of direct thrombin inhibitors and their potential to replace currently available anticoagulants are reviewed.

Extensive prolongation of aPTT with argatroban in an elderly patient with improving renal function, normal hepatic enzymes, and metastatic lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of an elderly male with improving renal function and normal hepatic function who sustained an elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) after an infusion of argatroban was discontinued.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old white male with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and metastatic lung disease was started on argatroban for treatment of a right upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The infusion was initiated at 2.0 microg/kg/min and was titrated to a goal aPTT of 60-80 seconds. Argatroban was discontinued due to an aPTT elevated to >100 seconds; the aPTT remained elevated for 130 hours after discontinuation of the infusion.

DISCUSSION

Argatroban dose reductions in patients with impaired liver and renal function test values have been reported. Elderly subjects may have a prolonged clearance compared with young healthy subjects, although the duration of effect has not been established. As of April 18, 2005, the effect of liver metastasis on argatroban pharmacokinetics in the setting of normal liver function enzyme levels has not been reported. An objective causality assessment using the Naranjo probability scale showed that the prolonged aPTT was probably attributable to argatroban.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should exercise caution when initiating argatroban at a dose of 2.0 microg/kg/min in elderly patients with underlying comorbidities, such as metastatic disease and renal impairment, since this may lead to excessive and prolonged anticoagulation and increased risk of bleeding.

Ximelagatran: a new antithrombotic option in atrial fibrillation

Treatment strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation typically involve pharmacologic or interventional invasive therapies to suppress the rhythm, control ventricular contraction rates, or prevent thromboembolic complications. Current therapies used for rhythm conversion in atrial fibrillation may have undesirable risks or side effects that limit this approach. Lifelong anticoagulation may be necessary to prevent the formation of thrombus in the left atrial chamber that can travel into the cerebral circulation to cause a stroke. Currently, warfarin is the most commonly prescribed anticoagulant for this purpose. Unfortunately, many patients with atrial fibrillation may not receive warfarin because of the difficulties in dosing and maintaining desirable target goals. The oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran has several pharmacologic properties that provide a unique and potentially desirable treatment option. Clinical studies have demonstrated that ximelagatran, administered in twice-daily doses of 36 mg, is non-inferior to warfarin for thromboprophylaxis against stroke or systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation. The pharmacology of ximelagatran and clinical trials with its use in atrial fibrillation is reviewed.

Ximelagatran: an oral direct thrombin inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To present the chemistry, pharmacology, and pharmacokinetics of ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), and to review available comparative clinical trial data evaluating its efficacy and safety relative to other antithrombotic agents in the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases (1995-August 2004), supplemented by a manual search of article bibliographies, conference abstracts, and data on file from the manufacturer, was conducted. Key search terms were ximelagatran, melagatran, H376/95, and direct thrombin inhibitors.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent information from available clinical trials, including study design, patient demographics, dosing regimens, anticoagulant comparators, methods for evaluating effectiveness, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations, was extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ximelagatran is an orally administered DTI under development for use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE), long-term prevention of a second VTE event, stroke secondary to atrial fibrillation, prevention of VTE after orthopedic procedures, and recurrent ischemic events after acute myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Ximelagatran, in twice-daily doses of 24 or 36 mg, is an alternative to low-molecular-weight heparins or warfarin in thromboprophylaxis following orthopedic knee replacement, atrial fibrillation, or initial treatment of VTE. Improved outcomes versus placebo were seen in the long-term prevention of VTE in patients who completed an initial 6 months of treatment. Liver-related effects need further clarification.

Decreased argatroban clearance unaffected by hemodialysis in anasarca

OBJECTIVE

To report the case of a patient with acute renal failure and anasarca undergoing hemodialysis who demonstrated a prolonged effect of argatroban despite having no hepatic dysfunction.

CASE SUMMARY

A 54-year-old white woman with a past medical history of St. Jude's prosthetic mitral valve placement was admitted for anasarca secondary to acute renal failure of unknown origin. In order to prevent valve thrombosis and stroke, argatroban was initiated. Despite having no hepatic dysfunction, the patient demonstrated an elevated activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) for a prolonged period of time, requiring a significant dose reduction. This suggested reduced clearance of argatroban. Furthermore, this prolonged effect persisted despite hemodialysis.

DISCUSSION

Patients with severe renal dysfunction eliminate argatroban at a rate similar to that in healthy volunteers, while those with hepatic disease have a marked decrease in argatroban elimination. Our patient apparently had a reduction in argatroban elimination similar to that in patients with hepatic dysfunction. The few published reports regarding the use of argatroban in patients undergoing hemodialysis generally lack any information regarding variations in plasma concentrations of argatroban, the aPTT, or the type of dialyzer used. The available data, as well as our report, suggest that dosing adjustment during hemodialysis may not be necessary in patients without associated hepatic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

This report suggests that in patients who are fluid-overloaded, the anticoagulant effects of argatroban may be prolonged to a degree similar to that observed in patients with hepatic disease. Our report supports the previously published data that hemodialysis has little, if any, role in increasing argatroban elimination.

New Treatment Options for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin, in various forms, is used in a variety of conditions including prophylaxis and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. Although the most common adverse effect related to the use of heparin is bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can also occur. Two types of HIT exist, HIT type I and type II. HIT type I is a mild and self-limiting disease in which the patient’s platelet count may decrease slightly but will recover with continued treatment. This is in contrast to HIT type II, which may lead to potentially devastating complications. Patients with HIT type II are at increased risk for thromboembolic complications that are mediated through autoimmune reactions and therefore require anticoagulation with danaparoid or one of the direct thrombin inhibitors, including lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. Limited data are available on the use of these agents in special populations including patients who are pregnant or those undergoing procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention, cardiopulmonary bypass and dialysis, and pregnancy. Future therapies may include the use of unfractionated heparin in combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Removal of lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, by hemodialysis, hemofiltration, or plasmapheresis

Lepirudin (recombinant hirudin), a direct thrombin inhibitor, is an effective alternative method of anticoagulation in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. However, because it is eliminated by the kidneys, the half-life of lepirudin may be substantially prolonged in patients with renal failure. Patients undergoing hemodialysis must be closely monitored, and therapy must be individualized based on each patient's ability to clear the drug. Current literature on the removal of lepirudin by dialysis or plasmapheresis is limited, but available data suggest that lepirudin can be removed with these methods. The ability of filtration systems to remove lepirudin from the blood is highly dependent on the membrane material used in the system. Understanding the effects of hemodialysis, hemofiltration, and plasmapheresis on lepirudin levels is important, especially since no antidote is available to treat elevated serum lepirudin concentrations.