Warfarin and acetaminophen interaction

Over-The-Counter Remedies in Older Adults: Patterns of Use, Potential Pitfalls, and Proposed Solutions

Over-the-counter (OTC) products such as pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements, vitamins, and herbal remedies are widely available and copiously used by older adults for health maintenance and symptom management. Owing to physiology, multimorbidity, and polypharmacy, this population is particularly vulnerable to inappropriate use of OTC products, adverse effects, and drug interactions. While OTC pharmaceuticals are bound by FDA-approved standards, dietary supplements are regulated differently, resulting in variable quality and increased possibility for adulteration. Internationally, standards for OTC products vary widely. Accessible educational information, improved provider-patient communication, and revision of regulatory policy could improve safety for older adult users of OTC products.

Pharmacotherapeutic considerations for the management of cardiovascular diseases among hospitalized COVID-19 patients

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are among the most frequently identified comorbidities in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Patients with CV comorbidities are typically prescribed with long-term medications. We reviewed the management of co-medications prescribed for CVDs among hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

AREAS COVERED

There is no specific contraindication or caution related to COVID-19 on the use of antihypertensives unless patients develop severe hypotension from septic shock where all antihypertensives should be discontinued or severe hyperkalemia in which continuation of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors is not desired. The continuation of antiplatelet or statin is not desired when severe thrombocytopenia or severe transminitis develop, respectively. Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants, particularly those who are critically ill, should be considered for substitution to parenteral anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

An individualized approach to medication management among hospitalized COVID-19 patients with concurrent CVDs would seem prudent with attention paid to changes in clinical conditions and medications intended for COVID-19. The decision to modify prescribed long-term CV medications should be entailed by close follow-up to check if a revision on the decision is needed, with resumption of any long-term CV medication before discharge if it is discontinued during hospitalization for COVID-19, to ensure continuity of care.

Gingival bleeding, a possible "serious" adverse drug reaction: An observational study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic drugs are known to increase the risk of gingival bleeding because they affect coagulation. However, other drugs could also be involved in gingival bleeding.

AIM

We performed a pharmacoepidemiological study to identify the drugs most frequently "suspected" in the occurrence of gingival bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We selected reports of "gingival bleeding" from 1 January 1985 to 30 September 2014 in the French PharmacoVigilance Database.

RESULTS

Among 523,808 reports of adverse drug reactions, we identified 454 reports of gingival bleeding (0.09%). Most of them were "serious" (58.4%) and occurred in females (54.6%). The frequency of gingival bleeding increased with age. The most frequently "suspected" drugs were antithrombotics (67.8%), particularly fluindione. Other drugs frequently involved were furosemide followed by paracetamol, amiodarone, amoxicillin, paroxetine, ketoprofen, zolpidem, enalapril and ramipril. Thirty-nine reports involved a drug-drug interaction with antithrombotics, mainly with anti-infectives.

CONCLUSION

Gingival bleeding can be an adverse drug reaction, often "serious" and rarely fatal. Patients older than 50 years and women are particularly at risk. Among drugs known to increase the risk of gingival bleeding, the most frequently involved were fluindione, furosemide, paracetamol, amiodarone, amoxicillin, paroxetine or ketoprofen. We also identified signal for drugs not usually known to be involved in bleeding, like zolpidem, enalapril or ramipril.

Observations on Possible Effects of Daily Vitamin K Replacement, Especially Upon Warfarin Therapy

Daily parenteral vitamin K supplement is now recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients receiving IV hyperalimentation. This is considered as preferable to the previous recommendations of weekly parenteral or oral supplement, or as in some cases no supplement at all. Supplemental vitamin K1 will ensure adequate supplies for hepatic saturation and thus the production of clotting factors II, VII, IX, and X, plus the anticoagulants protein C, protein S, and protein Z. But this is not the entire story. This recommended supplement will affect other physiologic systems that also use vitamin K-dependent gamma-carboxylation. Vitamin K is not 1 molecule but rather 2 natural substances, vitamin K1 and K2, and the synthetic K3's. It is not understood, what, if any, effect may occur because of the saturation or competition from the vitamin K1 upon the functioning of vitamins K2 and the derivatives of K3 in vivo upon bone mineralization, cell growth, and blood vessel health, all known to be influenced by the vitamins K. There are probably other physiologic systems yet to be studied relative to vitamins K and gamma-carboxylation. This review also considers the available research upon warfarin when given to patients receiving hyperalimentation and what effects the vitamin K supplements may have. Because studies to date have not controlled for vitamin K intake, consideration is given to whether one should expect any change in previously reported outcomes when using low-dose warfarin for prophylaxis against central vein thrombosis. Also considered are possible positive or negative effects that chronic warfarin therapy may have upon the other vitamin K-dependent systems under discussion. This review offers a platform for further discussion and derived clinical research provoked by this new FDA recommendation.

Toward standardized reporting of drug interactions: the READI checklist for anecdotal reports

Anecdotal reports contribute 30% of the literature on adverse drug reactions and interactions. However, the quality of such reports has not been uniformly high. Standardized reporting of clinical studies is of increasing interest, including the CARE guidelines on reporting anecdotal cases in general. Although there are guidelines on evaluating and managing drug-drug interactions, there are none recommending methods for reporting suspected drug interactions. Here, based on published guidelines for reporting suspected adverse drug reactions, I propose a checklist for reporting details of suspected drug interactions, the REporting Anecdotal Drug Interactions (READI) checklist, hoping to stimulate discussion and improve reporting of suspected drug interactions. The checklist includes items relating, among others, to the patient affected, the drugs involved, and the outcome.

A Review of Warfarin Dosing With Concurrent Acetaminophen Therapy

Warfarin is frequently used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolism, yet it is associated with numerous drug interactions. Regarding over-the-counter pain medications, the preferred analgesic for those patients who are taking warfarin is acetaminophen. There are, however, reports of elevation in the international normalized ratio (INR) in those patients taking concurrent warfarin and acetaminophen. For those practitioners who manage warfarin therapy, there is little guidance regarding management of the drug–drug interaction between warfarin and acetaminophen. This review seeks to evaluate the drug interaction between warfarin and acetaminophen and provides recommendations for concurrent use of these drugs.

Effect of acetaminophen on international normalized ratio in patients receiving warfarin therapy

Warfarin is known to have extensive interactions with many classes of drugs. The literature suggesting a relevant interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin is inconsistent. Considering the ubiquitous use of acetaminophen, a review of the effects on international normalized ratio (INR) in patients taking warfarin was necessary. Thus, we performed a search of the PubMed (1966-November 2010) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-November 2010) databases to review the available literature addressing an acetaminophen-warfarin interaction and its possible mechanisms. A sample of case reports, in addition to all English-language studies were evaluated, and relevant references were examined for additional articles. Reports of nonwarfarin coumarin anticoagulants were excluded. Published documentation reporting an interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin is limited. Small prospective studies of various designs and case studies describe aberrant INR results in patients using acetaminophen while receiving warfarin. These INR elevations typically involved acetaminophen ingestion of at least 2 g/day for several consecutive days. In several small prospective studies, INR results were elevated to a statistically significant extent that would require a change in warfarin dosing and monitoring in clinical practice. The mechanism for this interaction remains to be elucidated yet is suggested to occur through alterations in hepatic metabolism. The use of moderate-to-high doses of acetaminophen while receiving warfarin results in supra-therapeutic INRs in some patients. The characteristics that may predispose a patient to this interaction are unclear, yet the widespread use of acetaminophen calls for enhanced clinician awareness and reinforcement of patient education about this interaction.

Using highly variable warfarin dosing to identify patients at risk for adverse events

BACKGROUND

Patients who receive highly variable doses of warfarin may be at risk for poor anticoagulation control and adverse events. However, we lack a system to identify patients with the highest dose variability. Our objectives were to develop a scoring system to identify patients with high dose variability, and to validate this new measure by demonstrating that patients so identified have poor anticoagulation control and higher rates of adverse events (criterion validity).

METHODS

We used a database of over 4, 000 patients who received oral anticoagulation in community practice between 2000-2002. We reviewed the charts of 168 patients with large warfarin dose variation and agreed on 18 risk factor definitions for high dose variability. We identified 109 patients with the highest dose variability (cases), as measured by coefficient of variation (CoV, SD/mean). We matched each case to two controls with low dose variability. Then, we examined all 327 charts, blinded to case/control status, to identify the presence or absence of the 18 risk factors for dose variability. We performed a multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of high CoV. We also compared anticoagulation control, as measured by percent time in therapeutic range (TTR), and rates of adverse events between groups.

RESULTS

CoV corresponded with other measures of anticoagulation control. TTR was 53% among cases and 79% among controls (p < 0.001). CoV also predicted adverse events. Six cases experienced a major hemorrhage versus 1 control (p < 0.001) and 3 cases had a thromboembolic event versus 0 control patients (p = 0.04). Independent predictors of high dose variability included hospitalization (OR = 21.3), decreased oral intake (OR = 12.2), use of systemic steroids (OR = 6.1), acetaminophen (OR = 4.0) and antibiotics (OR = 2.7; p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

CoV can be used to identify patients at risk for poor anticoagulation control and adverse events. This new measure has the potential to identify patients at high risk before they suffer adverse events.

Warfarin and acetaminophen interaction: a summary of the evidence and biologic plausibility

Ms TS is a 66-year-old woman who receives warfarin for prevention of systemic embolization in the setting of hypertension, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation. She had a transient ischemic attack about 4 years ago when she was receiving aspirin. Her INR control was excellent; however, over the past few months it has become erratic, and her average dose required to maintain an INR of 2.0 to 3.0 appears to have decreased. She has had back pain over this same period and has been taking acetaminophen at doses at large as 650 mg four times daily, with her dose varying based on her symptoms. You recall a potential interaction and wonder if (1) her acetaminophen use is contributing to her loss of INR control, and (2) does this interaction place her at increased risk of warfarin-related complications?

Interaction between acetaminophen and warfarin in adults receiving long-term oral anticoagulants: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

We investigated whether acetaminophen, given at 2 g/day and 3 g/day might potentiate the anticoagulant effect of warfarin.

METHODS

Forty-five patients on stable warfarin therapy, enrolled in this prospective, randomized, parallel (three arms), placebo-controlled study, received a 10-day regimen of acetaminophen (2 g/day or 3 g/day) or placebo.

RESULTS

The mean maximal INR increase was 0.70 ± 0.49 and 0.67 ± 0.62 in patients receiving acetaminophen at 2 g/day and 3 g/day, respectively (P=0.01 for the respective comparisons versus placebo). The INR increase became significant on day 3 and was independently and significantly predicted by a maximal decrease in factor II (R(2)=0.36, P<0.0001), factor VII (R (2)=0.46, P<0.0001) and a maximal increase in acetaminophen plasma concentrations (R(2)=0.563, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Acetaminophen, at 2 g/day or 3 g/day, enhanced the anticoagulant effect of warfarin in stable patients, thus requiring close INR monitoring in the clinical setting.

Adverse interaction of warfarin and paracetamol: evidence from a post-mortem study

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to establish the prevalence and nature of potential adverse drug combinations of warfarin in a large post-mortem toxicology database. The concomitant use of warfarin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was of interest as these drugs have been associated with internal bleeding both in clinical and post-mortem study settings. Another purpose was to obtain facts related to the questioned safety of warfarin-paracetamol and warfarin-tramadol combinations.

METHODS

The post-mortem database was searched for a 1-year period. All warfarin-positive cases and cases containing interacting drugs, as defined by the SFINX interaction database (Swedish, Finnish, Interaction X-referencing), were included. For controls, all cases containing paracetamol or tramadol were also included, and for each warfarin-positive case, an age-, sex- and alcohol-matched control case was sourced. The contribution of anticoagulant use to the deaths was evaluated from the death certificates based on medico-legal autopsies.

RESULTS

In 33% of the 328 warfarin-positive cases, at least one interacting drug was present, and paracetamol was the most abundant, accounting for 49% (n = 53). When paracetamol and warfarin were detected simultaneously, the number of fatal bleeds was 4.6 and 2.7 times higher compared to paracetamol or warfarin use alone respectively. The presence of an NSAID in combination with warfarin was rare, as only six cases were identified. A majority (66%) of the post-mortem blood samples had a warfarin concentration below 0.5 mg/l, and for the rest of the cases, the mean concentration was 0.70 mg/l.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the clinical evidence suggesting that warfarin-paracetamol interactions may create significant life-threatening conditions. It also accentuates the significant role post-mortem database research can have in improving drug safety.

[Factors of therapeutic imbalance of antivitamins K and their haemorrhagic consequences in elderly]

Objective. To determinate, for older subjects, specific factors of imbalance of the oral anticoagulant treatments. Method. We conducted an epidemiological and analytical case-control study, during 18 months, in 2 geriatrics centers. Each patient with excessive anticoagulation (INR>4.5) was matched with 2 controls under anticoagulant, whom the INR (international normalized ratio) had stayed in the therapeutic range. Results. One-hundred fifty nine subjects (53 cases and 106 controls) were included. Haemorrhagic complications has been observed in 19.2% of cases, versus 3.9% of the controls. Some medicines frequently prescribed to the old subjects were correlated at a risk of excessive anticoagulation: amiodarone (9.4% versus 0, p<0.004), acetaminophen (18.9% versus 0.9%, p<0.001), tramadol (5.6% versus 0, p<0.04), ofloxacine (11.3% versus 1.9%, p<0.001), and lactulose (11.3% versus 0, p<0.001). Furthermore, several acute states increase the risk of excessive INR to the old subjects: fever (p<0.001), malnutrition (p<0.001), dehydration (p=0.006), and acute diarrhea (p<0.001). Conclusion. Some specific geriatric factors raised may destabilize treatments by anticoagulants.

Structural study of 2-(1-oxo-1 H-inden-3-yl)-2H-indene-1,3-dione by DFT calculations, NMR and IR spectroscopy

Computational studies have been carried out at the DFT-B3LYP/6-31G(d) level of theory on the structural and spectroscopic properties of 2-(1-oxo-1 H-inden-3-yl)-2H-indene-1,3-dione (OID). Experimental studies were conducted on these parameters, including X-ray, FT-IR and 13C NMR spectroscopy. The optimized geometries of OID and its bonding characteristics as well as IR and NMR spectra have been calculated and analyzed. It was observed that the bond lengths and angles in the molecule, obtained by X-ray, IR and NMR at the level of theory, were in a good agreement with those of the experiment. The correlation between the theoretical and the experimental vibrational frequencies and the chemical shifts of the OID molecule were 0.994 and 0.991, respectively. The agreement mutually verified the accuracy of the experimental method and the validity of the applied mathematical model.

Adverse drug interactions involving common prescription and over-the-counter analgesic agents

BACKGROUND

Eight analgesic preparations with approved indications for acute pain were among the top 200 drugs prescribed in the United States in 2006. In addition, an estimated 36 million Americans use over-the-counter (OTC) analgesics daily. Given this volume of use, it is not surprising that a number of drug interactions involving analgesic drugs have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

This article examines the pharmacologic factors that enhance the clinical relevance of potential drug interactions and reviews the literature on drug interactions involving the most commonly used analgesic preparations in the United States.

METHODS

A PubMed search was conducted for English-language articles published between January 1967 and July 2007. Among the search terms were drug interactions, acetaminophen, aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib, NSAIDs, hydrocodone, oxycodone, codeine, tramadol, OTC analgesics, alcohol, ethanol, antihypertensive drugs, methotrexate, warfarin, SSRIs, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline, citalopram, serotonin syndrome, MAOIs, and overdose. Controlled clinical trials, case-control studies, and case reports were included in the review.

RESULTS

A number of case reports and well-controlled clinical trials were identified that provided evidence of the relatively well known drug-drug interactions between prescription/OTC NSAIDs and alcohol, antihypertensive drugs, high-dose methotrexate, and lithium, as well as between frequently prescribed narcotics and other central nervous system depressants. In contrast, the ability of recent alcohol ingestion to exacerbate the hepatotoxic potential of therapeutic doses of acetaminophen is not supported by either case reports or clinical research. Use of ibuprofen according to OTC guidelines in patients taking cardioprotective doses of aspirin does not appear to interfere with aspirin's antiplatelet activity, whereas chronic prescription use of ibuprofen and other NSAIDs may interfere. Low-dose aspirin intake appears to abolish the gastroprotective effects of cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibitors, including celecoxib. There is evidence of other less well known and potentially clinically significant drug-drug interactions, including the ability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to inhibit the analgesic activity of tramadol and codeine through inhibition of their metabolic activation, to induce serotonin syndrome when used chronically in the presence of high doses of tramadol through synergistic serotonergic action, and to increase the potential for gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAID therapy through additive or supra-additive antiplatelet activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the widespread use of analgesic agents, the overall incidence of serious drug-drug interactions involving these agents has been relatively low. The most serious interactions usually involved other interacting drugs with low therapeutic indices or chronic and/or high-dose use of an analgesic and the interacting drug.

The risks of warfarin use in the elderly

The use of warfarin in the elderly, particularly for stroke prevention in chronic atrial fibrillation, is steadily increasing. Although the benefits of warfarin are greatest in the elderly, so are the risk of adverse outcomes and the difficulties of anticoagulant management. Clinical systems need to improve to counter this therapeutic dilemma, as warfarin is likely to remain the only widely available oral anticoagulant for the foreseeable future. Aspects that require attention are: the careful selection of patients in whom treatment with warfarin is appropriate; initiating therapy in a low dose (e.g., 2.5-5 mg/day); thorough education of patients and carers; close monitoring, especially with any change in the patient's regular drug therapy; involving patients more in the management of their warfarin therapy (self-monitoring/management in suitable patients); and ongoing review of the appropriateness of therapy as circumstances change.

Paracetamol: a haemorrhagic risk factor in patients on warfarin

AIM

To quantify the effect of paracetamol on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin under normal clinical conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study, 11 patients on stable warfarin therapy received in random order two 14-day regimens of paracetamol 4 g day(-1) or placebo, with a 14-day or more wash-out period in between, time necessary to fulfil the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

In patients on paracetamol, the mean maximum increase in the International Normalized Ratio (INR) observed was 1.04 +/- 0.55 vs. 0.20 +/- 0.32 in those on placebo (P = 0.003). The mean maximum INR observed was significantly higher with paracetamol than with placebo (3.47 vs. 2.61, P = 0.01). In patients receiving paracetamol, the mean observed INR was significantly increased after 4 days (+ 0.6 +/- 0.6, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Paracetamol at 4 g day(-1) induces a significant increase in INR in patients receiving a stable regimen of warfarin, increasing the risk of bleeding associated with warfarin.

Drug Interactions with Paracetamol

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is one of the most commonly used analgesic antipyretic drugs worldwide, and it is widely available by prescription and over the counter (OTC). Fortunately, few clinically significant drug interactions have been documented. There is probable potentiation of hepatotoxicity following an overdose from the paracetamol metabolite NAPQI by enzyme-inducing drugs. There is considerable controversy regarding the possible interaction with warfarin in its potential to increase its anticoagulant effects because of discrepancies between observational studies and those in healthy volunteers. Otherwise, no serious adverse drug interactions with therapeutic doses of paracetamol have been confirmed in humans. Because the absorption of paracetamol is so dependent on gastric emptying, other drugs that alter gastric emptying can change its pharmacokinetics; but this would not cause serious adverse effects. Although animal experiments have demonstrated that many compounds can modify paracetamol hepatotoxicity, these are unlikely to be important at therapeutic doses.

Does paracetamol potentiate the effects of oral anticoagulants?: a literature review

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is the analgesic and antipyretic therapy of choice for patients receiving oral anticoagulation. It is widely used by patients in both prescription and over-the-counter products, resulting in frequent co-prescription with oral anticoagulants, especially in elderly patients. Indeed, older patients are the most likely to receive this combination of drugs because indications for both oral anticoagulation and analgesic therapy increase with age. For many years reports have presented evidence both for and against the idea that paracetamol may potentiate the anticoagulant effect of oral anticoagulants, thus increasing haemorrhagic risk in patients receiving this combination of drugs. This issue has continued to be a matter of debate in recent publications. No clear practical conclusion can be drawn from the studies because of methodological bias and the lack of clinical relevance. No prospective, randomised study assessing the effect of paracetamol on the anticoagulant effect of oral anticoagulants as used in clinical practice (i.e. the types of patients and dosages used in clinical practice) are available in the literature. The implications are considerable since on the one hand, the ingestion of paracetamol may be a cause of altered anticoagulation in patients who regularly take oral anticoagulation and who may have a haemorrhagic risk factor; and on the other hand, paracetamol might be the analgesic drug of choice that can be used without the need for any restrictions in patients receiving oral anticoagulant drugs. A comprehensive search of Medline and EMBASE for studies and case reports from 1966-2002 was performed in order to review the available literature on the interaction between paracetamol and oral anticoagulant drugs. In conclusion, the potential interaction between oral anticoagulant drugs and paracetamol is an important unanswered question, due to the growing incidence of the concomitant use of these drugs and the possible bleeding implications. The association between paracetamol and the occurrence of excessive INR values remains controversial due to lack of prospective clinical studies assessing the effect of the prescription of paracetamol in patients receiving long-term oral anticoagulation in clinical conditions. Such a study is currently ongoing.