Acute decompensated heart failure: a contemporary approach to pharmacotherapeutic management

Latent states extraction through Kalman Filter for the prediction of heart failure decompensation events

Cardiac function deterioration of heart failure patients is frequently manifested by the occurrence of decompensation events. One relevant step to adequately prevent cardiovascular status degradation is to predict decompensation episodes in order to allow preventive medical interventions.In this paper we introduce a methodology with the goal of finding onsets of worsening progressions from multiple physiological parameters which may have predictive value in decompensation events. The best performance was obtained for the model composed by only two features using a telemonitoring dataset (myHeart) with 41 patients. Results were achieved by applying leave-one-subject-out validation and correspond to a geometric mean of 83.67%. The obtained performance suggests that the methodology has the potential to be used in decision support solutions and assist in the prevention of this public health burden.

Risk Prediction of Heart Failure Decompensation Events in Multiparametric Feature Spaces

Cardiac function deterioration of heart failure patients is frequently manifested by the occurrence of decompensation events. One relevant step to adequately prevent cardiovascular status degradation is to predict decompensation episodes in order to allow preventive medical interventions. In this paper we introduce a methodology with the goal of finding relevant feature spaces from multiple physiological parameters which may have predictive value in decompensation events. The best performance was obtained for the feature space comprising the following features: mean weight, standard deviation of the blood pressure and mean of extra-thoracic impedance in a time window of 20 days. Results were achieved by applying leave-one-out validation and correspond to a geometric mean of 88.32%. The obtained performance suggests that the methodology has the potential to be used in decision support solutions and assist in the prevention of this public health burden.

Comparison of the Effects of Levosimendan Dobutamine and Vasodilator Therapy on Ongoing Myocardial Injury in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponins (cTn) are reliable and the most sensitive biomarker in the setting of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Acute decompensated heart failure is usually associated with worsening chronic heart failure, and it may be caused by ongoing minor myocardial cell damage that may occur without any reported precipitating factors.

METHODS

We compared the short-term effect of levosimendan (LEV), dobutamine (DOB), and vasodilator treatment (nitroglycerin [NTG]) on myocardial injury with hemodynamic, neurohumoral, and inflammatory indicators. One hundred twenty-two patients with a mean age of 66 ± 9 years were treated with LEV (n = 40), DOB (n = 42), and NTG (n = 40) and examined retrospectively. Blood samples (cTnI, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], highly sensitive C-reactive protein [HsCRP], and others), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS

At admission, detectable levels of cTnI were observed in 53% of patients (≥0.05 ng/mL). Serial changes in the mean cTnI levels were not significantly different between the groups (LEV 0.04 ± 0.01 to 0.03 ± 0.01 ng/mL; DOB 0.145 ± 0.08 to 0.08 ± 0.03 ng/mL; NTG 0.1 ± 0.03 to 0.09 ± 0.02 ng/mL; overall P = .859). Favourable effects on the NT-proBNP, sPAP values, LVEF, 6MWD, and HsCRP were observed overall, especially in the LEV groups.

CONCLUSION

Beneficial effects of short-term use of LEV, DOB, and NTG on ongoing myocardial injury were demonstrated. These findings can be attributed to the anti-ischemic properties as well as the hemodynamic, neurohumoral, and functional benefits from the positive inotropes, especially LEV, in patients with ADHF.

Role of guanylate cyclase modulators in decompensated heart failure

In this review we investigate the role of particulate and soluble guanylate cyclase (pGC and sGC, respectively) pathways in heart failure, and several novel drugs that modify guanylate cyclase. Nesiritide and ularitide/urodilatin are natriuretic peptides with vasodilating, natriuretic and diuretic effects, acting on pGC, whilst cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667) is a novel sGC activator. Cinaciguat has a promising and novel mode of action because it can stimulate cyclic guanosine-3',5'-monophosphate synthesis by targeting sGC in its nitric oxide-insensitive, oxidised ferric (Fe(3+)) or haem-free state. Thus, cinaciguat may also be effective under oxidative stress conditions resulting in oxidised or haem-free sGC refractory to traditional organic nitrate therapies. Preliminary studies of cinaciguat in patients with acute decompensated heart failure show substantial improvements in haemodynamics and symptoms, whilst maintaining renal function.

Depression and coping in heart failure patients: a review of the literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to critically evaluate the evidence related to depression and coping in heart failure patients and determine if certain types of coping are more common in heart failure patients with depression.

METHODS

A computer search of the literature from January 1996 through October 2008 was conducted. PubMed was searched using the following key search terms: congestive heart failure, heart failure, coping, and depression. Three independent reviewers met to discuss the studies, interpret findings, compare studies, and discuss recommendations.

RESULTS

Coping strategies were found to be associated with depression in patients with heart failure. Adaptive coping such as active coping, acceptance, and planning tended to be used by more patients and were associated with less depression. Those who used more maladaptive methods of coping such as denial and disengagement had higher levels of depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Further longitudinal research on depression and coping strategies and best treatment options for coping and depression in patients with heart failure are needed.

Cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667) improves cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667) is the first of a new class of soluble guanylate cyclase activators in clinical development for acute decompensated heart failure. We aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects, safety, and tolerability of intravenous cinaciguat in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure > or =18 mm Hg).

METHODS AND RESULTS

After initial dose finding (part A; n=27), cinaciguat was evaluated in the nonrandomized, uncontrolled proof-of-concept part of the study (part B; n=33) using a starting dose of 100 microg/h, which could be titrated depending on hemodynamic response. Patients were categorized as responders if their pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased by > or =4 mm Hg compared with baseline. Final doses of cinaciguat after 6 hours of infusion in part B were 50 microg/h (n=2), 200 microg/h (n=12), and 400 microg/h (n=16). Compared with baseline, a 6-hour infusion of cinaciguat led to significant reductions in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-7.9 mm Hg), mean right atrial pressure (-2.9 mm Hg), mean pulmonary artery pressure (-6.5 mm Hg), pulmonary vascular resistance (-43.4 dynes . s . cm(-5)), and systemic vascular resistance (-597 dynes . s . cm(-5)), while increasing heart rate by 4.4 bpm and cardiac output by 1.68 L/min. The responder rate was 53% after 2 hours, 83% after 4 hours, and 90% after 6 hours. Cinaciguat was well tolerated, with 13 of 60 patients reporting 14 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events of mild to moderate intensity, most commonly hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Cinaciguat has potent preload- and afterload-reducing effects, increasing cardiac output. Further investigation of cinaciguat for acute decompensated heart failure is warranted.

A Review of Critical Differences among Loop, Thiazide, and Thiazide-Like Diuretics

Diuretics are a drug class with heterogeneous assortments. This article reviews general pharmacologic mechanisms and clinical implications of loop, thiazide, and thiazide-like diuretics.

Loop diuretics act in the loop of Henle by blocking the sodium-potassium-chloride (Na+-K+-2Cl-) symport. They are effective in relieving congestive symptoms and edematous signs of heart failure. Activation of the neurohormonal system and subsequent pathologic myocardial remodeling limit the use of loop diuretics unless fluid balance is not met to relieve patients' symptoms with life-saving pharmacologic modalities. Adverse effects on electrolyte balance may cause life-threatening consequences. The combination of K+-sparing diuretics or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors with loop diuretics may not only prevent life-threatening complications caused by electrolyte imbalance, but also may delay progression of the disease with proven mortality benefit. Recent findings of worsening renal function and higher mortality rate with the use of oral and intravenous loop diuretics further demands appropriate use of these drugs.

Thiazide diuretics and thiazide-like diuretics act in the distal convoluted tubule by blocking Na+-Cl- symport. Thiazide diuretics reduce cardiovascular mortality by achieving target blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Compared with other antihypertensive drugs, thiazide diuretics have less desirable metabolic effects. However, it has not yet been shown that the negative metabolic effects of these drugs are associated with negative mortality and morbidity. Based on the need for a multidrug regimen to reach target blood pressure in most patients with hypertension, thiazide diuretics may be used in addition to a drug or drugs without metabolic complications.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability, and safety of the soluble guanylate cyclase activator cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667) in healthy male volunteers

Preclinical data indicate that the nitric oxide-independent soluble guanylate cyclase activator cinaciguat (BAY 58-2667), which is a new drug in development for patients with heart failure, induces vasodilation preferentially in diseased vessels. This study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of cinaciguat. Seventy-six healthy volunteers were included in this randomized, placebo-controlled study. Cinaciguat (50-250 microg/h) was administered intravenously for up to 4 hours in a maximum of 6 individuals per dose group. No serious adverse events were reported. Four-hour infusions (50-250 microg/h) decreased diastolic blood pressure and increased heart rate (all P values < .05) versus placebo, without significantly reducing systolic blood pressure (P between 0.07 and 0.56). At higher doses (150-250 microg/h), 4-hour infusions decreased mean arterial pressure and increased plasma cyclic guanosine monophosphate levels (all P values < .05). Pharmacokinetics showed dose-proportionality with low interindividual variability. Plasma concentrations declined below 1.0 microg/L within 30 minutes of cessation of infusion. Cinaciguat had potent cardiovascular effects reducing preload and afterload, warranting further investigation in patients with heart failure.

Endogenous B-type natriuretic peptide: a limb of the regulatory response to acutely decompensated heart failure

Acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) represents an episodic failure of cardiorenal homeostasis that may resolve with upregulation of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and certain prostacyclins. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) has multiple favorable effects, including vasodilation, diuresis, natriuresis, and inhibition of vascular endothelial proliferation and cardiac fibrosis. By antagonizing the effects of activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system in volume overload, the endogenous BNP response may help rescue patients from episodic ADHF. Although knowledge of BNP physiology is expanding, we still have limited understanding of the heterogeneity of proBNP-derived molecules, including active 32 amino acid BNP and less active junk BNP forms. Emerging evidence suggests that in ADHF, the endogenous BNP response is overwhelmed by neurohormonal activation. This relative BNP deficiency may also be accompanied by physiologic resistance to BNP. Additionally, abnormalities of BNP production may result in a lower proportion of active BNP relative to less active forms that may also be detected by point-of-care tests. Improved detection of the various BNP species may clarify these concepts and facilitate improved clinical management of ADHF.

Practical applications of intravenous diuretic therapy in decompensated heart failure

Intravenous (IV) loop diuretics play an important role in the treatment of decompensated heart failure (DHF). They inhibit the Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) reabsorptive pump in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle, and the resultant natriuresis and diuresis decreases volume load, improves hemodynamics, and reduces DHF symptoms. However, loop diuretics have a short half-life and their efficacy may be limited by postdiuretic sodium rebound during the period between doses in which the tubular diuretic concentration is subtherapeutic. Moreover, they can produce electrolyte abnormalities, neurohormonal activation, intravascular volume depletion, and renal dysfunction. Several studies have reported an association between diuretic therapy and increased morbidity and mortality. In addition, many patients, especially those with more advanced forms of heart failure (HF), are resistant to standard doses of loop diuretics. These high-risk, resistant patients may benefit from pharmacologic and/or nonpharmacologic interventions to improve hemodynamic performance, treatment of renovascular disease, discontinuation of aspirin and other sodium-retaining drugs, manipulation of the route of delivery or combination of diuretic classes, or hemofiltration. Despite >50 years of use, many questions regarding the use of intravenous diuretic agents in patients with DHF are still unanswered, and there remains a compelling need for well-designed randomized, controlled clinical trials to establish appropriate treatment regimens that maximize therapeutic benefit while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

The confounding issue of comorbid renal insufficiency

The United States is currently beleaguered by twin epidemics, heart failure (HF) and renal insufficiency (RI). HF and RI frequently coexist in the same patient, and this conjunction, often called the "cardiorenal syndrome," has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. Approximately 60% to 80% of patients hospitalized for HF have at least stage III renal dysfunction as defined by the National Kidney Foundation (NKF), and this comorbid RI is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality risk. Numerous studies have demonstrated that in patients with HF, indices of renal function are the most powerful independent mortality risk predictors. Comorbid RI can result from both intrinsic renal disease and inadequate renal perfusion. Atherosclerosis, renal vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension are significant precursors of both HF and RI. Moreover, diminished renal perfusion is frequently a consequence of the hemodynamic changes associated with HF and its treatment. Both HF and RI stimulate neurohormonal activation, increasing both preload and afterload and reducing cardiac output. Inotropic agents augment this neurohormonal activation. In addition, diuretics can produce hypovolemia and intravenous vasodilators can cause hypotension, further diminishing renal perfusion. Management of these patients requires successfully negotiating the delicate balance between adequate volume reduction and worsening renal function. Despite this, few evidence-based data are available to guide management decisions, indicating a compelling need for additional studies in this patient population.

Pharmacoeconomic Modeling of Nesiritide versus Dobutamine for Decompensated Heart Failure

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To model the cost-effectiveness of nesiritide compared with dobutamine in patients with decompensated heart failure.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A decision tree model was derived from randomized clinical trial data and data from a previously published economic study. Four cost-effectiveness analyses were performed: analysis 1 -- full probabilistic analysis, repeatedly sampled probabilities for 6-month mortality and hospital readmission from distributions based on 95% confidence intervals (CIs); analysis 2 -- best-case nesiritide analysis, used the limiting values of the 95% CI favorable to nesiritide; analysis 3 -- best-case dobutamine analysis, used the limiting values of the 95% CI favorable to dobutamine; and analysis 4 -- replicated the previously published cost-effectiveness study and served as a methodologic control. Fifty-one consecutive Monte Carlo simulations for cohorts of 1000 hypothetical patients were performed for each analysis. Incremental cost, incremental effectiveness, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for nesiritide versus dobutamine. Analysis 1 showed a mean ICER of 767 US dollars/life-year gained for nesiritide versus dobutamine (incremental cost 251 US dollars +/- 290 US dollars, incremental effectiveness 0.33 +/- 0.22 yr). The 95% confidence region surrounding this point estimate spanned all four quadrants of the incremental cost-effectiveness scatterplot, suggesting inconclusive results. Nesiritide was the dominant treatment strategy in analysis 2 (incremental cost -734 US dollars+/- 106 US dollars, incremental effectiveness 1.19 +/- 0.07 yrs), whereas dobutamine was dominant in analysis 3 (incremental cost 1242 +/- 73 US dollars, incremental effectiveness -0.57 +/- 0.05 yr). Analysis 4 was comparable to the previously published cost-effectiveness analysis (incremental cost -77 +/- 87 US dollars, incremental effectiveness 0.48 +/- 0.05 yr).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available randomized clinical trial data, nesiritide did not exhibit robust economic superiority over dobutamine. When incorporating the uncertainty (i.e., 95% CIs) in clinical effectiveness as reported in available clinical trial data into the economic analysis, either nesiritide or dobutamine may be the dominant treatment (i.e., more effective at lower cost) for the studied population. Economic analyses of nesiritide and any comparator must account for uncertainty in estimates of cost as well as in clinical effectiveness.

Nesiritide use for critically ill children awaiting cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effects of nesiritide in children awaiting cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

At the discretion of the attending physician, nesiritide was added to standard therapy for seven children (median age, 11 months) and continued until clinical improvement or transplantation. Blood pressure and urine output data were compared with data from the day before nesiritide institution. Safety parameters were assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

Urine output increased from 2.6 to 3.6 ml/kg/h (p = 0.04). No significant blood pressure changes or adverse effects related to nesiritide were noted.

CONCLUSION

Nesiritide may be safe and effective for children with severe heart failure.

Levosimendan: a novel inotropic agent for treatment of acute, decompensated heart failure

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on a novel calcium sensitizer, levosimendan.

DATA SOURCES

Articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-June 2005), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2005), and EMBASE (1992-June 2005) using the key words levosimendan, simendan, calcium sensitizer, calcium sensitiser, and congestive heart failure.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical trials and pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of levosimendan were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Levosimendan 6-24 mug/kg intravenous bolus followed by a 24-hour continuous infusion of 0.05-0.2 microg/kg/min improved cardiac output and reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in a dose-dependent manner. Dose-ranging and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improvement in symptoms and hemodynamics and short-term survival outcomes in the treatment of acute, decompensated heart failure. Clinical trials evaluating retrospective mortality data and combined endpoints (mortality, rehospitalization) have demonstrated better outcomes with levosimendan compared with dobutamine. The incidence of hypotension with levosimendan is not significantly different than with dobutamine, but there is a dose-related increase in heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Levosimendan is useful in moderate to severe low-output heart failure in patients who have failed to respond to diuretics and vasodilators. Based on current studies, levosimendan appears to be a safe alternative to dobutamine for treatment of acute, decompensated heart failure. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm the effect of levosimendan on long-term survival and its role in heart failure in the setting of myocardial infarction.

The benefits of early vasoactive therapy in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure

PURPOSE

To review current issues in the management of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), focusing on the early initiation of intravenous (i.v.) vasoactive therapy and including the effects of vasoactive drugs on patient outcomes and the benefits and limitations of each medication class.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the worldwide scientific literature on ADHF.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of ADHF may be improved by early initiation of i.v. vasoactive therapy, reduced use of inotropic agents, and judicious use of diuretics. Data to date suggest that early treatment with the natriuretic peptide nesiritide reduces duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, and requirements for i.v. inotropes and diuretics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Advance practice nurses play an integral role in the management of patients with ADHF from initial triage in the emergency department through final discharge from the hospital. Because they are typically responsible for administering medications and monitoring patient status, nurses need to be familiar with the benefits and limitations of each class of vasoactive agent. They need to recognize that prompt initiation of i.v. vasodilator therapy is important for improving patient outcomes. Further, advance practice nurses should participate in team management that promotes the use of evidence-based ADHF care by developing, using, and assertively communicating the need for processes of care that facilitate best practices.

A review of the renal and neurohormonal effects of B-type natriuretic peptide

Adverse neurohormonal activation is an essential component in the pathogenesis of acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF). Consequently, blunting this activation is an important therapeutic goal. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a counterregulatory hormone produced by the ventricles in response to pressure and volume load. Endogenous BNP levels are significantly elevated in patients with acute CHF, but these levels are frequently inadequate to overcome the excess neurohormonal activation present in this condition. Infusion of nesiritide, a recombinant form of endogenous human BNP, increases circulating BNP levels by several-fold, augmenting the counterregulatory effects of this hormone. Clinical trials demonstrate that in patients with acute decompensated CHF, nesiritide produces arterial and venous vasodilation, reducing both preload and afterload; blunts adverse neurohormones, including renin, aldosterone, norepinephrine, and endothelin-1; and improves renal hemodynamics and tubular function. As a result, nesiritide quickly reduces clinical symptoms and improves mortality in patients with acute CHF.

Nesiritide added to standard care favorably reduces systolic blood pressure compared with standard care alone in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

The Prospective Randomized Outcomes study of Acutely decompensated Congestive heart failure Treated Initially as Outpatients with Nesiritide (PROACTION) trial evaluated the safety of nesiritide administration in the emergency department in patients with decompensated heart failure. Patients (N=237) were treated for at least 12 hours with standard care plus either intravenous nesiritide or placebo. Compared to placebo, nesiritide favorably decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with elevated baseline SBP, without negatively impacting patients with lower baseline SBP (SBP, >140 mm Hg: nesiritide, -28.7 mm Hg, vs placebo, -8.4 mm Hg [P<.001]; SBP, 101-140 mm Hg: nesiritide, -12.3 mm Hg, vs placebo, -5 mm Hg [P<.017]; SBP, <101 mm Hg: nesiritide, -1.2 mm Hg vs placebo, +16.7 mm Hg [P<.03]). Both treatment groups had similar incidences of symptomatic and asymptomatic hypotension. These data demonstrate that early administration of nesiritide in the emergency department is a safe and effective treatment of heart failure.

Anemia Management in Heart Failure: A Thick Review of Thin Data

Heart failure is defined as the inability of the heart to pump blood at an amount sufficient to meet the metabolic needs of the body. In heart failure, the inability to meet the body's metabolic needs is based on hemodynamic derangement and suboptimal oxygen-carrying capacity of the blood itself. Current pharmacologic therapy attempts to improve survival and reduce symptomatology by optimizing hemodynamics to increase oxygen delivery, but does not address oxygen-carrying capacity. Unfortunately, there is a high prevalence of anemia in patients with heart failure, which compromises oxygen-carrying capacity, is an independent predictor of mortality, and may be caused in part by pharmacologic agents that confer morbidity and mortality benefits in this population. Recombinant human erythropoietin supplementation improves the functional capacity of the failing myocardium, reverses and antagonizes the detrimental remodeling induced by autoimmune activity, and may reduce mortality and morbidity among patients receiving maximal pharmacologic therapy for heart failure. However, limited clinical data prohibit widespread recommendations for its use in patients with heart failure.