Special Considerations with Fondaparinux Therapy: Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Wound Healing

Mechanistic Studies of DNase I Activity: Impact of Heparin Variants and PAD4

Background

Excessive production of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in sepsis contributes to vascular occlusion by acting as a scaffold and stimulus for thrombus formation. Removal of extracellular DNA, the major structural component of NETs, by DNase I may reduce host injury.

Objectives

(1) To determine how heparin variants (unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, Vasoflux, and fondaparinux) affect DNase I activity, (2) to measure temporal changes in circulating DNA and DNase I in septic patients.

Methods

DNA–histone complexes were treated with DNase I ± heparin variants and visualized via agarose gels. We compared the ability of DNase I ± heparin variants to digest NETs released by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-stimulated neutrophils versus DNA–histone complexes released by necrotic HEK293 cells. Plasma DNA and DNase I levels were measured longitudinally in 76 septic patients.

Results

Heparin enhances DNase I-mediated digestion of DNA–histone complexes in a size-dependent manner that does not require the antithrombin-binding region. In contrast, DNase I alone was able to degrade the DNA–histone component of NETs presumably due to peptidylarginine deiminase 4 (PAD4)-mediated histone citrullination that weakens DNA–histone interactions. In purified systems, PAD4 treatment of DNA–histone complexes enhanced the ability of DNase I to degrade histone-bound DNA. In septic patients, endogenous DNase I levels remained persistently low over 28 days, and there were no significant correlations between DNA and DNase I levels.

Conclusion

Heparin enhances DNA-mediated digestion of DNA–histone complexes in a size-dependent manner that is independent of its anticoagulant properties. Citrullination of histones by PAD4 renders DNA–histone complexes susceptible to DNase I digestion. Endogenous DNase I levels are persistently decreased in septic patients, which supports the potential utility of DNase I as a therapy for sepsis.

Choosing the Appropriate Antithrombotic Agent for the Prevention and Treatment of VTE: A Case-Based Approach

Objective:

To review the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in various patient populations and evaluate the agents available for the prevention and treatment of VTE using a case-based approach.

Data Sources:

A MEDLINE search (1995–July 2006) was conducted to identify relevant literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles related to the prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery, general surgery, and medically ill patients, as well as the treatment of VTE, were reviewed.

Data Synthesis:

Pharmacologic options for the prevention and treatment of VTE include warfarin, unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), and fondaparinux. Current guidelines support the use of warfarin, LMWH, or fondaparinux for VTE prophylaxis following lower limb major orthopedic surgery. For VTE prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients or patients undergoing general surgery, use of UFH and LMWH is supported; however, recent data on fondaparinux suggest that it is also effective in these patient populations. The use of UFH or LMWH (both in conjunction with warfarin) for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis or nonmassive pulmonary embolism is recommended. Recent data suggest that fondaparinux (in conjunction with warfarin) is also effective for the treatment of VTE. A variety of pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacoeconomic factors differentiate each agent for the various indications.

Conclusions:

Currently, a “one-size-fits-all” anticoagulant is not available for treatment of VTE. A variety of patient factors, including type of surgery, medical indication, thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk, history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and a variety of comorbid conditions can affect the safety, efficacy, and selection of appropriate VTE therapy.

[Dermatologic aspects of anticoagulation]

The coagulation system protects the body from uncontrolled blood loss by means of highly regulated processes. In case of an injury the coagulation system instantly switches from controlled blood flow to acute coagulation and thrombus formation with the goal of stopping the blood loss. Minor changes in this well-maintained equilibrium of coagulation and blood flow tip the balance towards uncontrolled blood loss or even fatal thromboembolic events. Iatrogenic manipulation of this highly regulated system is possible with a variety of therapeutic agents. We review the basics of coagulation physiology and then discuss dermatologically relevant aspects of thrombosis prevention, as well as the use of anticoagulants to treat dermatologic diseases.

The use of fondaparinux for the treatment of venous thromboembolism in a patient with heparin-induced thombocytopenia and thrombosis caused by heparin flushes

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunologic drug reaction characterized by paradoxical association with venous and arterial thrombosis. The syndrome is caused by IgG antibodies that are reactive against complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Fondparinux does not bind to platelet factor 4, is structurally too short to induce an antibody response, and could in theory be a useful agent to treat HIT. A 69-year-old white female presented with a lower extremity extensive iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis after a right total knee arthroplasty and was subsequently found to have a pulmonary embolism. The patient was noted to have heparin flushes during her operation. Her platelet drop decreased >50% from baseline during initiation of antithrombotic therapy. She was started on subcutaneous fondaparinux 7.5 mg once daily injection. Her serotonin release assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for heparin antibodies were positive for HIT. Her platelet count nadir was 60 x 0(3)/mm(3) on day 5 and the platelet count rebounded after 8 days of fondaparinux therapy. No recurrent thrombotic or bleeding events were noted throughout her therapy. Anecdotal reports have shown that fondaparinux can be a useful agent to treat HIT with or without thrombosis.

Fondaparinux as a Treatment Option for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated complication that can occur after exposure to heparin products. Because patients with HIT are at increased risk for thrombosis, anticoagulation is warranted. The direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin and argatroban are approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. Bivalirudin, another direct thrombin inhibitor, is approved for use in patients with HIT who must undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. The synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux lacks FDA approval for treating patients with HIT; however, a few published reports describe its use. Furthermore, various small-scale, in vitro studies have demonstrated a lack of cross-reactivity between fondaparinux and HIT antibodies. Large, in vivo comparison trials must be performed before fondaparinux can become a standard treatment option in the setting of HIT.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Treatment Options and Special Considerations

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse effect that typically manifests several days after the start of heparin therapy, although both rapid- and delayed-onset HIT have been described. Its most serious complication is thrombosis. Although not all patients develop thrombosis, it can be life threatening. The risk of developing HIT is related to many factors, including the type of heparin product administered, route of administration, duration of therapy, patient population, and previous exposure to heparin. The diagnosis of HIT is typically based on clinical presentation, exposure to heparin, and presence of thrombocytopenia with or without thrombosis. Antigen and activation laboratory assays are available to support the diagnosis of HIT. However, because of the limited sensitivity and specificity of these assays, bedside probability scales for HIT were developed. When HIT is suspected, prompt cessation of all heparin therapy is necessary, along with initiation of alternative anticoagulant therapy. Two direct thrombin inhibitors--argatroban and lepirudin--are approved for the management of HIT in the United States, and bivalirudin is approved for use in patients with HIT who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Other agents, although not approved to manage HIT, have also been used; however, their role in therapy requires further evaluation. A comprehensive HIT management strategy involves the evaluation of numerous factors. Many patients, including those undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, those with acute coronary syndromes, those with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and children, require special attention. Clinicians must become familiar with the available information on this serious adverse effect and its treatment so that optimum patient management strategies may be formulated.

Venous thromboembolism in trauma: an update for the intensive care unit practitioner

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in trauma patients is a capricious problem that continues to plague trauma surgeons and critical care physicians alike. Pharmacologic preventions of VTE with anticoagulants are often contraindicated in the trauma patient because of risk of bleeding diathesis. Mechanical prophylaxis in the form of venous compression boots often cannot be placed because of external fixators, swelling, and so forth. Providing effective VTE prophylaxis, while at the same time providing definitive care for the trauma patient, can be a nightmare. This review will first discuss the incidence and prevalence of VTE, as well as investigate the condition's diagnosis and treatment. Solutions to frequently encountered clinical dilemmas in managing VTE in trauma patients are considered in the form of frequently asked questions. Diagnostic techniques such as magnetic resonance venography, D-dimer, and various computed tomography methods are evaluated. Recent literature on preventive pharmacologic therapies is explored. The authors also consider whether vena cava filters prevent pulmonary embolism in trauma patients.

The prophylaxis of venous thrombosis in patients with cancer undergoing major abdominal surgery: emerging options

Cancer is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). This risk is amplified by treatment with chemotherapy, radiation, or surgery. Thus, patients with cancer undergoing major surgery should receive appropriate prophylaxis. Available agents include low-dose unfractionated heparin (LDUH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and Factor Xa inhibitors. Recent data suggest that Factor Xa inhibitors are safe and effective for VTE prevention in patients with cancer undergoing abdominal surgery. Further study in this patient population is warranted.

Argatroban Dosing of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and an Elevated aPTT Due to Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome

Objective:

To describe the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (HITTS) or without thrombosis (HIT) who also had an elevated baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) due to antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS).

Case Summary:

Four patients with HIT/HITTS and an elevated baseline aPTT due to APS were identified. Two patients had venous thrombosis, 1 had limb ischemia, and 1 had isolated HIT. All 4 were managed with a weight-based fixed dose of argatroban without laboratory monitoring. None of the patients had thrombotic or bleeding complications once therapy was initiated.

Discussion:

Management of patients with HIT/HITTS and an abnormal baseline aPTT due to APS is problematic. We review alternative management strategies, such as monitoring direct thrombin inhibitors with the ecarin clotting time or thrombin inhibition time or using an alternative anticoagulant, such as fondaparinux. As of March 13, 2006, none of these management strategies has been evaluated in a clinical trial for this patient population. We report the successful use of weight-based, fixed-dose argatroban without laboratory monitoring in patients with APS.

Conclusions:

Use of a fixed-dose argatroban regimen without laboratory monitoring is a potential management strategy for patients with HIT/HITTS and an elevated baseline aPTT due to APS.

Heparin and Other Rapidly Acting Anticoagulants

Unfractionated heparin, derived from porcine intestine, is the prototype of a rapidly acting anticoagulant. It has been used for over 60 years to arrest or prevent thrombus growth. Low-molecular-weight heparins, available in the last 20 years, are manufactured from unfractionated heparin and have superior dose-response relationships because of fewer nonspecific reactions with plasma proteins and cells. Fondaparinux is a recently approved five-saccharide synthetic molecule that carries the evolution of heparin further. It is a pure Xa inhibitor, with minimal nonspecific interactions. It does not appear to elicit the antibody that leads to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). All of these agents are given either intravenously or subcutaneously. They act indirectly by activating the natural plasma inhibitor, antithrombin III. Direct thrombin inhibitors bind directly to thrombin's active site without interaction with the cofactor, antithrombin III. Lepirudin (Refludan; Berlex, Wayne, NJ) and argatroban (Argatroban; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) are given intravenously and are usually used in HIT and thrombosis associated with HIT. Bivalirudin (Angiomax; The Medicines Company, Parsippany, NJ) is a parenteral direct thrombin used in place of heparin in percutaneous coronary interventions. Ximelagatran (Exanta; AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE) is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor under development for both acute and chronic anticoagulation.

Managing Complications of Anticoagulant Therapy

Understanding the frequency, risk factors, and management of anticoagulant-induced adverse events will assist clinicians in optimizing patient outcomes. The most frequent adverse event of all anticoagulants is major bleeding. Risk factors for major bleeding have been identified with the heparin compounds, the direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), fondaparinux, and warfarin therapy. Understanding these risk factors can help prevent bleeding events. For cases of clinically significant bleeding, reversal agents exist primarily for heparin and warfarin. Although less common, nonbleeding adverse events of anticoagulant therapy can also be life threatening. The heparin compounds are associated with the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and osteoporosis. HIT can result in life-threatening thrombosis and is usually managed with a DTI. Nonbleeding adverse events with warfarin therapy include skin reactions and the development of venous limb gangrene. Appropriate initiation of warfarin therapy may decrease the risk of venous limb gangrene.