Pharmacokinetic Comparison Between a Fixed-Dose Combination of Empagliflozin L-Proline/Metformin and Empagliflozin/Metformin in Healthy Korean Subjects

Empagliflozin and metformin are oral antidiabetic drugs commonly used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus as a combination therapy. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics and safety of a newly developed fixed-dose combination of 5-mg empagliflozin L-proline and 1000-mg metformin with the reference drug. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean subjects. The subjects received a single oral dose of reference drug or test drug at each period. The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental method. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of the plasma maximum concentration (Cmax ) and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast ) were calculated. A total of 27 healthy subjects were included in the PK analysis. For empagliflozin, the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of the test to reference drug for Cmax and AUClast were 1.03 (0.99-1.08) and 1.03 (1.00-1.06), respectively. For metformin, the corresponding values for Cmax  and AUClast were 0.99 (0.92-1.06) and 1.00 (0.94-1.06), respectively. In conclusion, a fixed-dose combination of empagliflozin L-proline and metformin showed similar PK characteristics to the reference drug, and both drugs were safe in healthy subjects.

Beneficial effect of lixisenatide after 76 weeks of treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis from the GetGoal programme

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of lixisenatide, a short-acting, prandial glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) as add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of 76-week results of 5 placebo-controlled clinical trials from the GetGoal programme was performed, including 3000 inadequately controlled adult diabetic patients where lixisenatide 20 µg once-daily was administered in combination with metformin (GetGoal-M and GetGoal-F1), sulphonylurea ± metformin (GetGoal-S), basal insulin ± metformin (GetGoal-L) or pioglitazone ± metformin (GetGoal-P).

RESULTS

A significant reduction in HbA1c at 76 weeks was observed in the intervention arm compared to placebo (LSM difference: -0.41%, 95%CI: -0.51, -0.32, P < .00001). Compared to placebo, lixisenatide induced a larger decrease in fasting plasma glucose (LSM difference -0.49 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.71, -0.27, P < .0001) and postprandial glucose excursion after a standard test meal (LSM difference -3.29 mmol/L, 95% CI -4.17, -2.42, P < .00001). A bodyweight reduction was observed in the lixisenatide arm (LSM difference -0.40 kg, 95%CI: -0.8, -0.01, P = .05). The risk of hypoglycaemia was slightly higher with lixisenatide vs placebo (risk difference +0.02, 95% CI: 0, 0.04, P = .04). The most commonly observed non-severe adverse events were nausea and vomiting, which after week 16 and week 8, were steadily <4% and <1% in the lixisenatide arm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lixisenatide, a once-daily prandial GLP-1 RA, provides long-term glycaemic control, a sustained beneficial effect on weight and with a good safety profile.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between metformin and a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, evogliptin, in healthy subjects

Evogliptin is a newly developed dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, which is expected to be combined with metformin for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. We investigated the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between evogliptin and metformin. A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, six-sequence, three-period crossover study was conducted in 36 healthy male subjects. All subjects received three treatments, separated by 7-day washout intervals: evogliptin, 5 mg od for 7 days (EVO); metformin IR, 1,000 mg bid for 7 days (MET); and the combination of EVO and MET (EVO + MET). After the last dose in a period, serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours for pharmacokinetic assessments. During steady state, serial blood samples were collected for 2 hours after an oral glucose tolerance test, and DPP-4, active glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose, glucagon, insulin, and C-peptide were measured to assess pharmacodynamic properties. EVO + MET and EVO showed similar steady state maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve at steady state values for evogliptin; the geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) were 1.06 (1.01-1.12) and 1.02 (0.99-1.06), respectively. EVO + MET slightly reduced steady state maximum concentration and area under the concentration-time curve at steady state values for metformin compared to MET, with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence interval) of 0.84 (0.79-0.89) and 0.94 (0.89-0.98), respectively. EVO + MET and EVO had similar DPP-4 inhibition efficacy, but EVO + MET increased active glucagon-like peptide-1 and reduced glucose to larger extents than either EVO or MET alone. Our results suggested that EVO+MET could provide therapeutic benefits without clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions. Thus, the EVO + MET combination is a promising option for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Lixisenatide as add-on to oral anti-diabetic therapy: an effective treatment for glycaemic control with body weight benefits in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Achieving recommended glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires effective control of fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose. As T2DM progresses, oral anti-diabetics are no longer sufficient to maintain glycaemic control. Five phase III studies in the GetGoal clinical trial programme assessed the efficacy of lixisenatide, a once-daily prandial glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in combination with oral anti-diabetics in patients with T2DM insufficiently controlled using oral anti-diabetics.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was performed of the results of five 24-week clinical trials (comprising 2760 patients) concerning lixisenatide or placebo plus oral anti-diabetic therapy. The primary endpoint of these studies was change in HbA1c at week 24. Changes in fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose, and weight were also established as were the odds ratios for hypoglycaemia and composite safety and efficacy endpoints. Meta-analysis outcomes were assessed using a random effects model. All meta-analyses were performed using RevMan, version 5.1.

RESULTS

Lixisenatide was significantly better than placebo in terms of achieving all endpoints in this meta-analysis, including the primary endpoint change in HbA1c at week 24, with p < 0.0001 for all endpoints. The mean number of symptomatic hypoglycaemic events per patient year was increased for patients in the lixisenatide versus placebo groups (p = 0.04). However, compared with patients in the placebo group, patients treated with lixisenatide were more likely to achieve composite efficacy and safety endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrates that lixisenatide in combination with oral anti-diabetic therapy significantly improves outcomes combining efficacy and safety parameters in patients with T2DM.

Antidiabetic-drug combination treatment for glucose intolerance in adult female rats treated acutely with olanzapine

Second generation antipsychotic drugs are routinely used as treatment for psychotic disorders. Many of these compounds, including olanzapine, cause metabolic side-effects such as impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance. Individual antidiabetic drugs can help control elevated glucose levels in patients treated with antipsychotics, but the effects of combining antidiabetics, which routinely occurs with Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, have never been studied. Presently, we compared the effects of the three different antidiabetics metformin (500mg/kg, p.o.), rosiglitazone (30mg/kg, p.o.) and glyburide (10mg/kg, p.o.) on metabolic dysregulation in adult female rats treated acutely with olanzapine. In addition, dual combinations of each of these antidiabetics were compared head-to-head against each other and the individual drugs. The animals received two daily treatments with antidiabetics and were then treated acutely with olanzapine (10mg/kg, i.p.). Fasting glucose and insulin levels were measured, followed by a 2h glucose tolerance test. Olanzapine caused a large and highly significant glucose intolerance compared to vehicle treated rats. Rosiglitazone decreased glucose levels non-significantly, while both metformin and glyburide significantly decreased glucose levels compared to olanzapine-only treated animals. For antidiabetic dual-drug combinations, the rosiglitazone-metformin group showed an unexpected increase in glucose levels compared to all of the single antidiabetic drugs. However, both the metformin-glyburide and rosiglitazone-glyburide groups showed significantly greater reductions in glucose levels following olanzapine than with single drug treatment alone for metformin or rosiglitazone, bringing glucose levels down to values equivalent to vehicle-only treated animals. These findings indicate that further study of antidiabetic dual-drug combinations in patients treated with antipsychotic drugs is warranted.

Metformin and its clinical use: new insights for an old drug in clinical practice

Metformin is generally recommended as first-line treatment in type 2 diabetes, especially in overweight patients, but in recent years new indications for its use have emerged. Metformin has been found to be safe and efficacious both as monotherapy and in combination with all oral antidiabetic agents and insulins. If metformin use during pregnancy and the lactation period is supported by few data, it could be indicated for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, since it could diminish circulating androgens and insulin resistance, thus ameliorating the ovulation rate. Metformin seems to reduce cancer risk, which appears to be increased in diabetics, and is a promising agent for oncoprevention and chemotherapy combinations. Moreover, metformin could find a place in the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lactic acidosis could be decreased by avoiding metformin use in patients with hypovolemia, sepsis, renal impairment, hypoxic respiratory diseases and heart failure, in the preoperative period and before intravenous injection of contrast media.

Recent Publications on Medications and Pharmacy

Hospital Pharmacy presents this feature to keep pharmacists abreast of new publications in the medical/pharmacy literature. Articles of interest regarding a broad scope of topics are abstracted monthly. Suggestions or comments may be addressed to Flint Russett, St. Claire Regional Medical Center, 222 Medical Circle, Morehead, KY 40351, or e-mail: FSRussett@st-claire.org .