Cephalometric Analysis of Craniofacial Malformations in Newborn Mice with Cleft Palate Induced by Retinoic Acid

All-Trans Retinoic Acid-Induced Craniofacial Malformation Model: A Prenatal and Postnatal Morphological Analysis

Objective

To characterize the prenatal and postnatal craniofacial bone development in mouse model of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) exposure at different ages by a quantitative and morphological analysis of skull morphology.

Methods

Pregnant mice were exposed to ATRA at embryonic day 10 (E10) and 13 (E13) by oral gavage. Skulls of mice embryos at E19.5 and adult mice at postnatal day 35 (P35) were collected for high-resolution microcomputed tomography (microCT) imaging scanning and section HE staining. Reconstruction and measurement of mouse skulls were performed for prenatal and postnatal analysis of the control and ATRA-exposed mice.

Results

Craniofacial malformations in mouse models caused by ATRA exposure were age dependent. ATRA exposure at E10 induced cleft palate in 81.8% of the fetuses, whereas the palatine bone of E13-exposed mice was intact. Inhibitions of maxilla and mandible development with craniofacial asymmetry induced were observed at E19.5 and P35. Compared with control and E13-exposed mice, the palatine bones of E10-exposed mice were not elevated and were smaller in dimension. Some E10-exposed mice exhibited other craniofacial abnormalities, including premature fusion of mandibular symphysis with a missing mandibular incisor and a smaller mandible. Severe deviated snouts and amorphous craniofacial suture were detected in E13-exposed mice at P35.

Conclusion

These morphological variations in E10- and E13-exposed mice suggested that ATRA was teratogenic in craniofacial bone development in mice and the effect was age dependent.

Analysis of the Relationship Between Micrognathia and Cleft Palate: A Systematic Review

Objective To gather data from relevant experimental and observational studies to determine the relationship between micrognathia and cleft palate. The goal is to raise awareness and motivate clinicians to consider the cause and effect relationship when confronted with patients with cleft palate, even if there is no clearly noticeable mandibular abnormality. Design Several electronic databases were systematically examined to find articles for this review, using search terms including "cleft palate," "micrognathia," "tongue," and "airway obstruction." PubMed was the source of all the articles chosen to be included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, articles focused on treatment options, and articles only tangentially related to cleft palate and/or micrognathia. Results A total of 930 articles were screened for relevance, and 82 articles were chosen for further analysis. Evidence gathered in this review includes a variety of etiological factors that are causative or associated with both micrognathia and cleft palate. Observational studies relating the two abnormalities are also included. Much of the included literature recognizes a cause-and-effect relationship between micrognathia and cleft palate. Conclusion On the basis of the published data, we suggest that micrognathia does induce cleft palate in humans and animals. With knowledge of this causative relationship, clinicians should consider the importance of gathering cephalometric data on the mandibles and tongues of patients presenting with isolated cleft palate to determine whether they have micrognathia as well. With more data, patterns may emerge that could give insight into the complex etiology of nonsyndromic cleft palate.

The eye as an organizer of craniofacial development

The formation and invagination of the optic stalk coincides with the migration of cranial neural crest (CNC) cells, and a growing body of data reveals that the optic stalk and CNC cells communicate to lay the foundations for periocular and craniofacial development. Following migration, the interaction between the developing eye and surrounding periocular mesenchyme (POM) continues, leading to induction of transcriptional regulatory cascades that regulate craniofacial morphogenesis. Studies in chick, mice, and zebrafish have revealed a remarkable level of genetic and mechanistic conservation, affirming the power of each animal model to shed light on the broader morphogenic process. This review will focus on the role of the developing eye in orchestrating craniofacial morphogenesis, utilizing morphogenic gradients, paracrine signaling, and transcriptional regulatory cascades to establish an evolutionarily-conserved facial architecture. We propose that in addition to the forebrain, the eye functions during early craniofacial morphogenesis as a key organizer of facial development, independent of its role in vision.