Assessment of Scar Quality after Cleft Lip Closure

Cleft Lip Scar Appearance is Associated With Speech Outcomes After Primary Palatoplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the correlation between the quality of cleft lip scar and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI).

METHODS

Clinical photographs from 56 patients with repaired cleft lip and palate (CLP) were collected and anonymized by cropping the image to the region of interest around the lip and nose. A survey displaying each cleft lip scar image with five associated scar quality features, including scar color, thickness, width, lip shortening, and overall appearance, was distributed. Surveys were distributed using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), an online crowdsourcing platform, to obtain ratings from 330 laypeople. The same surveys were also distributed to 45 medical students.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Hypernasality was used as the primary speech outcome measure. Ordinal logistic regression was used to compare the ratings for each of the five scar quality categories with the patients' CAPS-A-AM hypernasality rating for both MTurk and medical student raters. Significance was set at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

For medical student ratings', ordinal logistic regression showed a statistically significant relationship between lip shortening (P=0.019) and overall appearance (P=0.044) with CAPS-A-AM hypernasality score, whereas the other scar categories showed no significant association. There was no statistically significant relationship between MTurk ratings and hypernasality for any of the scar categories.

CONCLUSIONS

The association found between lip shortening and overall scar appearance, thought by the authors to indicate scar contracture, and hypernasality, an indicator of VPI severity, provides an interesting insight into how to potentially identify patients who may be at increased risk for developing VPI.

Evaluation of Vermillion Symmetry and Scar Quality in Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair Using Modified Millard's Technique Versus Fisher's Technique

BACKGROUND

Since the primary goal of cleft lip repair is to achieve a symmetrical, aesthetic lip, several surgical techniques have been utilized. Accordingly, in this study, a unilateral cleft lip was surgically repaired using two techniques: modified Millard's and Fisher's techniques.

PURPOSE

This study was designed to compare the vermillion symmetry and scar quality in the surgical management of patients with unilateral incomplete cleft lip using the modified Millard's and Fisher's techniques.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLE

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. The study involved 20 patients selected from the Department of Plastic Pediatric Surgery at the Specialized Pediatric Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University. The patients included in the study were aged between 2 and 6 months old, had a primary nonsyndromic unilateral incomplete cleft lip, and had no other associated anomalies.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The predictor variable was operative management of the cleft lip, and subjects were randomly assigned to either the modified Millard or Fisher techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome, vermillion symmetry, was evaluated by computerized photogrammetric lip analysis with Image J software. Additionally, scar quality, considered a secondary outcome, was assessed with the Vancouver Scar Scale and the Image J software. Every measurement was meticulously recorded in millimeters.

COVARIATES

Age, sex, and cleft side were considered.

ANALYSES

Descriptive and analytic statistics were computed. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The study comprised 20 children (12 males and 8 females), with a mean age of 140.5 ± 23.7 days in the Fisher's group and 137.4 ± 25.6 days in the modified Millard's group (P = .8). No statistically significant differences (P = .6) were found in vermillion height and width between both groups at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months. Similarly, there were no statistically significant differences (P = .4) between both groups in terms of scar length and width at the 3- and 6-month follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

This study found no statistically significant differences in vermillion symmetry and scar quality between the two cleft lip repair techniques. Notably, one patient in the modified Millard group exhibited a notch on the vermillion border, which was not statistically significant.

Scar Outcome in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip Repair: A Comparative Analysis of Vertical Lip Lengthening Strategies Using the Rotation-Advancement Concept

OBJECTIVE

To assess the differences in scar outcomes between modified rotation-advancement techniques proposed by Drs. Mohler and Noordhoff, designed to address issues such as inadequate vertical lip length and scarring on the upper third of the lip in the original rotation-advancement technique.

DESIGN

Retrospective single-surgeon (RD) study.

PATIENTS

Consecutive non-syndromic children (n = 68) with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

INTERVENTIONS

Modified Mohler (columellar backcut reconstructed with C flap; n = 34) and modified Noordhoff (lower, medially-created backcut reconstructed with laterally-based triangular skin flap; n = 34) repairs.

MEAN OUTCOME MEASURES

Using 12-month postoperative frontal photographs, scar evaluations (overall and superior, middle, and inferior portions of the lip) were appraised by an assessment panel composed by independent professional and nonprofessional raters employing four validated qualitative scar assessment scales: Manchester Scar Scale, modified Scar-Rating Scale, Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale, and Visual Analog Scale. Quantitative computerized photogrammetric scar widths of the superior, middle, and inferior portions of the upper lip were also measured.

RESULTS

The modified Noordhoff method showed significantly (all P < .001) better scar quality for the overall scar and superior portion of the scar in all four scales compared to the modified Mohler method, with no significant (all P > .05) difference for the middle and lower portions. No significant difference (all P > .05) was observed for photogrammetric scar width measurements.

CONCLUSION

The modified Noordhoff technique provided better qualitative results for unilateral complete cleft lip-related scars compared to the modified Mohler technique.

CO2 Laser for Esthetic Healing of Injuries and Surgical Wounds with Small Parenchymal Defects in Oral Soft Tissues

A number of studies have recently demonstrated the effectiveness of CO2 laser irradiation for the repair and regeneration of scar tissue from injuries or surgical wounds. However, such studies of the oral mucosa are highly limited. Previous studies using CO2 laser irradiation have indicated that two factors contribute to esthetic healing, namely, artificial scabs, which are a coagulated and carbonized blood layer formed on the wound surface, and photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for suppressing wound scarring and promoting wound healing. This review outlines basic research and clinical studies of esthetic healing with the use of a CO2 laser for both artificial scab formation by high-intensity laser therapy and PBMT in the treatment of injuries and surgical wounds with small parenchymal defects in oral soft tissues. The results showed that the wound surface was covered by an artificial scab, enabling the accumulation of blood and the perfusion necessary for tissue regeneration and repair. Subsequent PBMT also downregulated the expression of transformation growth factor-b1, which is involved in tissue scarring, and decreased the appearance of myofibroblasts. Taken together, artificial scabs and PBMT using CO2 lasers contribute to the suppression of scarring in the tissue repair process, leading to favorable esthetic and functional outcomes of wound healing.

Patients’ satisfaction with the effects of microporous tape on surgical scars: a randomized controlled study

Background Following surgery or other types of trauma, scar formation occurs with wound healing because of the replacement of normal skin with fibrous tissue. The conversion of a normal scar to an abnormal scar usually occurs 6 to 8 weeks after surgery. Abnormal scars can be a source of patient dissatisfaction, especially following cosmetic surgical procedures. Therefore, supporting scars with tape after surgery is critical for reducing scar tension. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of patients’ satisfaction with their scar outcomes following microporous taping and to identify the determinants of scar satisfaction.Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to compare the scar satisfaction of postsurgical patients who underwent scar taping with microporous tape to those who did not. The scars were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS). The test group had microporous tape applied to their scars and the tape was worn 24 hours a day for a period of 6 months. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Categorical variables and mean PSAS scores were compared using the chi-square test and repeated-measures analysis of variance, respectively.Results At 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months the taped group had significantly lower PSAS scores and higher satisfaction scores than the control group. Scar thickness and pruritus were statistically significant determinants of patient satisfaction.Conclusions Microporous tape is an effective modality for improving scar satisfaction in postsurgical patients.

Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair: A Quantitative Scale Assessment of Postoperative Lip and Nose Scars Across 2 Operative Techniques

BACKGROUND

There is no quantitative evidence supporting one unilateral cleft lip (UCL) repair technique over the other with regard to scarring. We sought to evaluate the difference between the extended Mohler and Millard techniques, using 3 scar assessment scales.

METHODS

Postoperative frontal and basal photographs of patients undergoing UCL repair were reviewed. Three validated scar assessment scales were used: the Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), modified scar-rating scale (MSRS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. Lip and nose scars were rated by 5 independent raters using each of the scales. Interrater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Assessment of 116 images for 58 consecutive patients undergoing UCL repair (36 extended Mohler, 22 Millard) was performed. Interrater reliability was excellent for lip scars (ICCs, 0.903 [0.857-0.938] for MSS, 0.913 [0.872-0.944] for MSRS, and 0.850 [0.775-0.902] for SBES) and moderate for nose scar assessment (ICCs, 0.714 [0.579-0.816] for MSS, 0.693 [0.548-0.802] for MSRS, and 0.565 [0.359-0.720] for SBES). No statistically significant difference was found between the extended Mohler and Millard repairs in mean lip scar scores (MSS, 6.983 ± 1.469 vs 6.772 ± 1.175, P = 0.571; MSRS, 5.433 ± 1.530 vs 5.481 ± 1.290, P = 0.902; SBES, 3.633 ± 0.977 vs 3.446 ± 0.995, P = 0.483) or nose scar scores (MSS, 5.644 ± 1.131 vs 5.491 ± 0.689, P = 0.523; MSRS, 4.233 ± 0.987 vs 3.991 ± 0.705, P = 0.320; SBES, 3.933 ± 0.750 vs 4.018 ± 0.486, P = 0.603).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 3 validated scar assessment scales, no significant difference was found between the extended Mohler and Millard techniques in terms of lip or nose scars.

[Evaluation of advantages of Contractubex gel usage for postsurgical scars treatment in comparison with absence of systematized topical scars treatment of kids with congenital cleft lip and palate]

OBJECTIVE

Is to evaluate the advantage of Contractubex gel with regards to influence on vascularisation, pigmentation, thickness, surface size, configuration, and elisticity of postsurgical scars of children (after cheilorinoplasty) in comparison to absence of systematized topical treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Into the prospective, non-interventional, observational, multi-centered, in parallel groups, open, controlled study were included 60 patients aged 2,5 months and older with postsurgical scars after first cheilorinoplasty after 7-14 day after operation. Patients were randomized into 2 groups of 30 patients in each. I group - patients get applications of Contractubex gel 3 times a day (in the morning, in the afternoon, in the evening) in accordance with patient information leaflet. II group - control group with no regular therapy of of postsurgical scars (without treatment or without application of oils and gels with anticsarring action). The period of medicine usage - 9 months and more for each patient, the each patient observation duration is 18 months.

RESULTS

After analysis of the primary as well as secondary efficacy criteria (total grade based on POSAS scale, reported by investigator/parent) after 3, 6, 12, 18 months of observation in both groups a positive statistically significant dynamics was registered. At the same time in the Contractubex group results were statistically significantly better than in the control group. Positive dynamics was achieved quickier in the main group than in the contol group and was to observe already after 3 months of therapy, during the whole treatment and observation phase, and after 18 months of therapy. Additionally conducted photodocumentation of postsurgical scar development dynamics in terms of the study confirms positive effect of surgery and absence of visual data regarding keloids or hyperthrophic scars formation in patients in both groups. Adverse events, i. a. pain, itch, burning, long-run hyperemia were not registered during the whole period os study.

CONCLUSION

The conducted study has shown high efficacy and safety of Contractubex usage for the treatment of postsurgical scars of children with with congenital cleft lip and palate (from 2,5 months old). The statistically significant advantage of the therapy with Contractubex was demonstrated in comparison with the control group (with no regular topical treatment). The obtained results allow to recommend Contractubex gel as an effective and safe medicine for the treatment of scarring after surgeries for kids directly after sutures removal.

Association of Pediatric Patient Demographic Factors and Scar Anatomic Features With Scar Outcomes After Surgical Repair of Cleft Lip

Importance

Scar outcomes following cleft lip repair are an important component of pediatric patient and family satisfaction and indicate the need for future surgical interventions.

Objective

To assess the association of pediatric patient demographic factors and scar anatomic features with scar outcomes following cleft lip surgical repair.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A case-control study was conducted involving 58 pediatric patients who underwent surgical repair of a cleft lip from October 31, 2008, to August 4, 2016, at a tertiary care pediatric specialty hospital. Data on patient demographic factors, cleft type, and the surgical technique used were collected and analyzed from June 11, 2009, to November 21, 2017. Scar outcomes were subjectively rated by 3 physicians at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall scar outcomes at 6-month and 12-month postoperative intervals were based on rating of scar appearance, color, width, height, and alignment by using a subjective, 5-point scar-assessment scale in which 1 indicated the poorest aesthetic appearance and 5, the ideal aesthetic appearance.

Results

A total of 58 pediatric patients who underwent cleft lip repair were evaluated; mean (SD) age at time of repair, 4.8 (3.0) months. Of these, 44 (76%) were male and 14 (24%) were female, 37 (64%) were white, 11 (19%) were black, 7 (12%) were Hispanic, 2 (3%) were Asian, and 1 (2%) was of another race/ethnicity. Scores on the Cohen κ interrater test indicated either a substantial or almost perfect strength of agreement among the physicians grading the scar outcomes. At 12 months, patients with black skin type had worse overall scar outcomes than patients with white skin type (odds ratio [OR], -0.31; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.14; P = .03). A depressed scar height (OR, -0.54; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.49; P < .001), and hypopigmented scar color (OR, -0.45; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.32; P = .002) were associated with worse scar outcomes at 12 months following surgery. The overall median lip scar outcome significantly improved between the 6-month and 12-month follow-up assessments (scar-assessment scale score, 3.3; interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-4.0 vs 4.0; IQR, 3.3-4.3; P < .001). No association was observed between the anatomic type and severity of the cleft lip and scar outcomes (unilateral vs bilateral cleft, complete vs incomplete or microform cleft, and lip height ratio of the unilateral noncleft to cleft lip).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study's findings suggest that, compared with white pediatric patients, black pediatric patients exhibited worse overall scar outcomes. A depressed scar and a hypopigmented scar also were associated with overall worse scar appearance after surgical repair. Cleft lip scar outcomes were not significantly associated with the type and severity of the cleft lip.

Qualitative Assessment of Columella Scar Quality After Extended Mohler Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

BACKGROUND

The Extended Mohler cleft lip repair restores upper lip form using a columellar flap to fill the defect created by the downward rotation of Cupid's bow. The resulting columella incision is mentioned as a potential drawback. This study seeks to evaluate the morbidity of the resulting scar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 50 unilateral cleft lip patients treated using the Extended Mohler repair. 5 reviewers examined post-operative images. Three validated scar assessment scales were utilized: Manchester Scar Scale (MSS), Modified Scar-Rating Scale (MSRS), and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES). A scar score for the lip and columellar portion of each patient was determined.

RESULTS

Three different scar scales demonstrated significantly better scar quality for the columellar portion of the scar compared to the lip portion. The average score for the lip and columella using the MSS was 7.0 ± 1.4 and 5.7 ± 1.1 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the MSRS was 5.5 ± 1.4 and 4.3 ± 0.9 (P <0.001). The average score for the lip and columella using the SBSES was 3.5 ± 1.1 and 3.9 ± 0.7 (P = 0.014). The intraclass correlation coefficient for lip scar assessments was 0.901 (MSS), 0.91 (MSRS), and 0.873 (Stony Brook Evaluation Scale [SBES]). The intraclass correlation coefficient for columellar scar assessment was 0.786 (MSS), 0.761 (MSRS), and 0.726 (SBES).

CONCLUSION

The Extended Mohler unilateral cleft lip columellar scar is of superior quality compared to the lip portion. This analysis ameliorates one of the major concerns regarding the Extended Mohler cleft lip repair.

A prospective, randomized clinical trial of transverse versus longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release

We investigated whether incision type affects scar quality or outcome following trigger finger release. Our primary and secondary hypotheses were that transverse and longitudinal incision types yield similar scar quality and functional improvement. Digits undergoing trigger finger release at the participating hospitals were randomized to receive transverse or longitudinal incisions. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale, Observer Scar Assessment Scale, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score were collected at 8 and 54 weeks postoperatively. Of 86 randomized patients, 67 patients (71%) had followed-up at 54 weeks postoperatively. We found no significant differences in above three assessments between the incisions at either time-point. Among patients receiving both incision types for multiple simultaneous trigger finger release, there were no significant differences in Patient Scar Assessment Scale or Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores. We found no significant difference in the scar quality and improvement in patient-reported disability with transverse or longitudinal incisions for trigger finger release. Level of evidence: II.

The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-Year-Old Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Tool for Nasolabial Aesthetics Assessment

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reliable and easy-to-use method to assess the nasolabial appearance of 18-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP).

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of nasolabial aesthetics using a 5-point ordinal scale and newly developed photographic reference scale: the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale (CARS). Three cleft surgeons and 20 medical students scored the nasolabial appearance on standardized frontal photographs.

SETTING

VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam.

PATIENTS

Inclusion criteria: 18-year-old patients, unilateral cleft lip and palate, available photograph of the frontal view.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

history of facial trauma, congenital syndromes affecting facial appearance. Eighty photographs were available for scoring.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the CARS for 18-year-old patients when used by cleft surgeons and medical students.

RESULTS

The interobserver reliability for the nose and lip together was 0.64 for the cleft surgeons and 0.61 for the medical students. There was an intraobserver reliability of 0.75 and 0.78 from the surgeons and students, respectively, on the nose and lip together. No significant difference was found between the cleft surgeons and medical students in the way they scored the nose ( P = 0.22) and lip ( P = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

The Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale for 18-year-old patients has a substantial overall estimated reliability when the average score is taken from three or more cleft surgeons or medical students assessing the nasolabial aesthetics of CLP patients.

Variation trends of the postoperative outcomes for unilateral cleft lip patients by modified Mohler and Tennison-Randall cheiloplasties

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative variation trends of unilateral cleft lip by stages, and to analyze influential factors of nasolabial symmetry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 145 patients with unilateral cleft lip were treated by the modified Mohler or Tennison-Randall technique, and received routine anti-scarring treatment postoperatively. Photogrammetry was applied to respectively measure 5 indices by stages preoperatively, the first week (1 w), the third month (3 m), the sixth month (6 m), and the first year (1 y) postoperatively. Then we calculated the symmetry ratio and drew line charts. Student t tests were used for any group differences; linear regression analysis was used to examine which postoperative stage correlated best with the preoperative stage; cluster analysis was used to classify the severity of the cleft according to preoperative SRsn-cphi, which was used to predict the operative difficulty and to select an appropriate technique.

RESULTS

The Mohler technique yielded a more symmetric result. With the Tennison-Randall technique, the alar base was more lateral and downward, and the lip height on cleft side seemed longer. A stable effect emerged around 1 year after surgery with both techniques. Conspicuous scars appeared at 3 months, most scars gradually fade at 6 months, and the total evolution took around 1 year. Scars from the Mohler technique fluctuated across a larger range. Preoperative SRsn-cphi of the two techniques had statistical significance and was adopted as the basis for cluster analysis. The critical value was 0.670. The Mohler technique attained an almost identical effect in each interval, whereas the Tennison-Randall technique was better in the interval that SRsn-cphi <0.670.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative SRsn-cphi can be the evaluation index of severity; the modified Mohler technique is more broadly applicable to differences in severity than is the Tennison-Randall technique.

The Development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale: A New Rating Scale for the Assessment of Nasolabial Appearance in Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients

OBJECTIVE

The development of the Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale, a simple and reliable photographic reference scale for the assessment of nasolabial appearance in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

DESIGN

A blind retrospective analysis of photographs of cleft lip and palate patients was performed with this new rating scale.

SETTING

VU Medical Center Amsterdam and the Academic Center for Dentistry of Amsterdam.

PATIENTS

Complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at the age of 6 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Photographs that showed the highest interobserver agreement in earlier assessments were selected for the photographic reference scale. Rules were attached to the rating scale to provide a guideline for the assessment and improve interobserver reliability. Cropped photographs revealing only the nasolabial area were assessed by six observers using this new Cleft Aesthetic Rating Scale in two different sessions.

RESULTS

Photographs of 62 children (6 years of age, 44 boys and 18 girls) were assessed. The interobserver reliability for the nose and lip together was 0.62, obtained with the intraclass correlation coefficient. To measure the internal consistency, a Cronbach alpha of .91 was calculated. The estimated reliability for three observers was .84, obtained with the Spearman Brown formula.

CONCLUSION

A new, easy to use, and reliable scoring system with a photographic reference scale is presented in this study.

The use and reliability of SymNose for quantitative measurement of the nose and lip in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients

INTRODUCTION

It is essential to have a reliable assessment method in order to compare the results of cleft lip and palate surgery. In this study the computer-based program SymNose, a method for quantitative assessment of the nose and lip, will be assessed on usability and reliability.

METHODS

The symmetry of the nose and lip was measured twice in 50 six-year-old complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by four observers. For the frontal view the asymmetry level of the nose and upper lip were evaluated and for the basal view the asymmetry level of the nose and nostrils were evaluated.

RESULTS

A mean inter-observer reliability when tracing each image once or twice was 0.70 and 0.75, respectively. Tracing the photographs with 2 observers and 4 observers gave a mean inter-observer score of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. The mean intra-observer reliability varied between 0.80 and 0.84.

CONCLUSIONS

SymNose is a practical and reliable tool for the retrospective assessment of large caseloads of 2D photographs of cleft patients for research purposes. Moderate to high single inter-observer reliability was found. For future research with SymNose reliable outcomes can be achieved by using the average outcomes of single tracings of two observers.

6-0 nylon versus 6-0 vicryl rapide in chieloplasty

Context:

Facial cosmetic result is one of the most concerning issues for the parents who get their children operated for cleft lip. Moreover, the discomfort associated with the suture removal encourages one to use any new technology that may replace the need for suture placement. The type of suture material used in surgery has been a long-standing debate among surgeons. In this study, we compared rapidly absorbable suture material (Vicryl Rapide™) with nonabsorbable suture material (nylon).

Aims:

The aim of this study is to compare the appearance and course of scar, wound infection, and patient's parent perception using Vicryl Rapide and nylon in nonsyndromic congenital cleft lip repair.

Settings and Design:

This was a randomized prospective controlled clinical trial.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty patients, in the age group of 3–18 months treated for unilateral congenital cleft lip deformity, were included and randomly allocated to two groups with ten patients each. Skin suturing was done with 6-0 polyamide and 6-0 irradiated polyglactin in Groups A and B, respectively. Patients were evaluated at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively in person by the observer as well as by the patient's parent.

Statistical Analysis Used:

Descriptive statistical analysis was done using SPSS 20, and Student's t-test was applied.

Results:

It was found that Vicryl Rapide showed more hypopigmented scars and raised scars than nylon at the end of 1 year though overall appearance was comparable between the groups.

Conclusions:

Vicryl Rapide showed poorer cosmetic outcomes in terms of height and pigmentation of car as compared to nylon suture of same thickness. However, since scars tend to improve with time, a bigger sample size and a longer follow-up are required to generalize this statement.

Influence of objective three-dimensional measures and movement images on surgeon treatment planning for lip revision surgery

Objective : To determine whether a systematic evaluation of facial soft tissues of patients with cleft lip and palate, using facial video images and objective three-dimensional measurements of movement, change surgeons' treatment plans for lip revision surgery. Design : Prospective longitudinal study. Setting : The University of North Carolina School of Dentistry. Patients, Participants : A group of patients with repaired cleft lip and palate (n = 21), a noncleft control group (n = 37), and surgeons experienced in cleft care. Interventions : Lip revision. Main Outcome Measures : (1) facial photographic images; (2) facial video images during animations; (3) objective three-dimensional measurements of upper lip movement based on z scores; and (4) objective dynamic and visual three-dimensional measurement of facial soft tissue movement. Results : With the use of the video images plus objective three-dimensional measures, the operating surgeon changed the problem list of the surgical treatment plan for 86% of the patients (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.97) and the surgical goals for 71% of the patients (95% confidence interval, 0.48 to 0.89). The surgeon group varied in the percentage of patients for whom the problem list was modified, ranging from 24% (95% confidence interval, 8% to 47%) to 48% (95% confidence interval, 26% to 70%) of patients, and the percentage for whom the surgical goals were modified, ranging from 14% (94% confidence interval, 3% to 36%) to 48% (95% confidence interval, 26% to 70%) of patients. Conclusions : For all surgeons, the additional assessment components of the systematic valuation resulted in a change in clinical decision making for some patients.

Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting

Background

The aim was to study which dressing material was best for healing donor-site wounds (DSWs) after split-skin grafting as there is wide variation in existing methods, ranging from classical gauze dressings to modern silicone dressings.

Methods

This 14-centre, six-armed randomized clinical trial (stratified by centre) compared six wound dressing materials in adult patients with DSWs larger than 10 cm2. Primary outcomes were time to complete re-epithelialization and pain scores measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) over 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included itching (VAS, over 4 weeks), adverse events and scarring after 12 weeks rated using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).

Results

Between October 2009 and December 2011, 289 patients were randomized (of whom 288 were analysed) to either alginate (45), film (49), gauze (50), hydrocolloid (49), hydrofibre (47) or silicone (48) dressings. Time to complete re-epithelialization using hydrocolloid dressings was 7 days shorter than when any other dressing was used (median 16 versus 23 days; P &lt; 0·001). Overall pain scores were low, and slightly lower with use of film dressings (P = 0·038). The infection rate among patients treated with gauze was twice as high as in those who had other dressings (18 versus 7·6 per cent; relative risk 2·38, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·14 to 4·99). Patients who had a film dressing were least satisfied with overall scar quality.

Conclusion

This trial showed that use of hydrocolloid dressings led to the speediest healing of DSWs. Gauze dressing should be discontinued as they caused more infections. Registration number: NTR1849 (http://www.trialregister.nl).