Immunotherapy of cancer: key findings and commentary on the third Tegernsee conference

Nanotherapeutic systems for delivering cancer vaccines: recent advances

With an increase in the global burden of cancer-related deaths, the quest for developing new therapeutic solutions has taken momentum. In this regard, the idea of using cancer vaccines came to existence approximately 30 years ago, where gene therapy interventions have shown significant improvement in the therapeutic outcomes against several types of cancers. Cancer vaccines usually encounter a number of challenges with limited targeting ability to the tumors. Nanocarriers have been studied as a technological innovation for tumor targeting of gene therapeutics. This article provides a critical insight into the recent progress made in nanotherapeutic strategies for genetic vaccine delivery for treatment against various types of cancers. Moreover, the article intends to provide a summary of the research work being done on this topic.

Molecular markers to predict clinical outcome and radiation induced toxicity in lung cancer

The elucidation of driver mutations involved in the molecular pathogenesis of cancer has led to a surge in the application of novel targeted therapeutics in lung cancer. Novel oncologic research continues to lead investigators towards targeting personalized tumor characteristics rather than applying targeted therapy to broad patient populations. Several driver genes, in particular epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and ALK fusions, are the earliest to have made their way into clinical trials. The avant-garde role of genomic profiling has led to important clinical challenges when adapting current standard treatments to personalized oncologic care. This new frontier of medicine requires newer biomarkers for toxicity that will identify patients at risk, as well as, new molecular markers to predict and assess clinical outcomes. Thus far, several signature genes have been developed to predict outcome as well as genetic factors related to inflammation to predict toxicity.

New insights into the role of the immune microenvironment in breast carcinoma

Recently, immune edition has been recognized as a new hallmark of cancer. In this respect, some clinical trials in breast cancer have reported imppressive outcomes related to laboratory immune findings, especially in the neoadjuvant and metastatic setting. Infiltration by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and their subtypes, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSC) seem bona fide prognostic and even predictive biomarkers, that will eventually be incorporated into diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms of breast cancer. In addition, the complex interaction of costimulatory and coinhibitory molecules on the immune synapse and the different signals that they may exert represent another exciting field to explore. In this review we try to summarize and elucidate these new concepts and knowledge from a translational perspective focusing on breast cancer, paying special attention to those aspects that might have more significance in clinical practice and could be useful to design successful therapeutic strategies in the future.

Novel immunotherapeutic strategies in development for renal cell carcinoma

CONTEXT

The purpose of this report is to review immunotherapies under investigation for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the most common form of kidney cancer, for which the incidence and mortality rate continue to increase.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate current data on immunotherapies for RCC and discuss issues to be resolved before integration into the RCC treatment paradigm.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, and congress abstracts/treatment guidelines was performed in May 2012 using the following terms (and variations): metastatic renal cell carcinoma, practice guidelines, response/resistance to current treatments, immunotherapy, novel immunotherapeutic strategies, T-cell modulation, immune priming, innate immunity, and combination therapy.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Prior to the advent of novel agents targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor and mechanistic target of rapamycin pathways, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon-α were the mainstays of RCC treatment. IL-2 remains one of the only treatments capable of curing advanced RCC, albeit in few patients. Despite recent advances, unmet need still exists for patients in the adjuvant setting, those with poor prognostic factors, and those who have progressed on prior targeted therapies. Improved understanding of host-tumor immune interactions has led to development of novel immunotherapeutic agents, including antibodies against immune checkpoint proteins (eg, programmed death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4), and various vaccines. Because many of these compounds are in development, clinical experience with them is limited, although some have demonstrated activity in preliminary studies.

CONCLUSIONS

It is not yet clear where these new immunotherapies will fit into RCC treatment paradigms, but they may provide new options for patients whose current choices are limited. Furthermore, predictive biomarkers are needed to identify patients who will derive the greatest benefit from immunotherapy.

Active-specific immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer constitutes about 85% of all newly diagnosed cases of lung cancer and continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Standard treatment for this devastating disease, such as systemic chemotherapy, has reached a plateau in effectiveness and comes with considerable toxicities. For all stages of disease fewer than 20% of patients are alive 5 years after diagnosis; for metastatic disease the median survival is less than one year. Until now, the success of active-specific immunotherapy for all tumor types has been sporadic and unpredictable. However, the active-specific stimulation of the host's own immune system still holds great promise for achieving non-toxic and durable antitumor responses. Recently, sipuleucel-T (Provenge(®); Dendreon Corp., Seattle, WA) was the first therapeutic cancer vaccine to receive market approval, in this case for advanced prostate cancer. Other phase III clinical trials using time-dependent endpoints, e.g. in melanoma and follicular lymphoma, have recently turned out positive. More sophisticated specific vaccines have now also been developed for lung cancer, which, for long, was not considered an immune-sensitive malignancy. This may explain why advances in active-specific immunotherapy for lung cancer lag behind similar efforts in renal cell cancer, melanoma or prostate cancer. However, various vaccines are now being evaluated in controlled phase III clinical trials, raising hopes that active-specific immunotherapy may become an additional effective therapy for patients with lung cancer. This article reviews the most prominent active-specific immunotherapeutic approaches using protein/peptide, whole tumor cells, and dendritic cells as vaccines for lung cancer.

Immunotherapy of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy of breast cancer has been shown to prevent recurrence, improve survival and eliminate breast cancer in humans.

AREAS COVERED

The reason for this review is to present the current information and the prospects for the future of immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans to include tumor antigens for vaccines and targets for monoclonal antibodies and adoptive T-cell therapy, and immune modulatory agents, such as adjuvants to stimulate the immune response and inhibitors of checkpoint blockade to prevent downmodulation of activated lymphocytes, to enhance these modalities. The research discussed and the literature search undertaken is of the clinical immunotherapy of breast cancer in humans, from 2000 to September, 2011.

EXPERT OPINION

The key message of the paper is that one reason for the failure of the immune system to control macroscopic disease is that the immune escape mechanisms involving both tumor and the tumor stroma prevent the immune system from destroying the tumor. Changing the tumor microenvironment is necessary to eliminate macroscopic tumors. Prospects for improvement are proposals for combining current modalities of therapy with type 1 cellular immunity-inducing agents, all targeting multiple tumor antigens and in the context of minimal disease.

Simultaneous TLR2 inhibition and TLR9 activation synergistically suppress tumor metastasis in mice

AIM

To develop a rational immunotherapy against tumor metastasis by combining a Toll-like-receptor 2 (TLR2)-neutralizing antibody with a TLR9 agonist CpG ODN, and then investigate the mechanism of action for this combinational regimen.

METHODS

After mouse melanoma B16-F10 cell inoculation, female C57BL/6 mice were treated with either CpG ODN (0.5 mg/kg) or the anti-TLR2 antibody (200 μg/kg), or with a combination of the two agents. Pulmonary metastases were evaluated by counting metastatic nodes on the lung surface using anatomical microscopy. Flow cytometry was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the immune cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes, the cell population in the spleen, and the infiltration of immune cells within the lungs. Cytokine and enzyme expression in the lung tissue was evaluated using ELISA or immunostaining.

RESULTS

Anti-metastatic effects were detected in mice treated with either CpG ODN or the anti-TLR2 antibody alone. However, treatment with CpG ODN plus the anti-TLR2 antibody synergistically suppressed the metastasis as compared with treatment with either single agent. The combinational treatment resulted in enhanced infiltration of natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells, reduced recruitment of type 2 macrophages and Tregs, and decreased expression of immunosuppressive factors including TGF-β1, cyclooxygenase-2 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, thus stimulated tumor cytotoxicity and suppressed metastasis. The anti-metastatic effect of the combinational regimen was further confirmed in spontaneous metastatic mouse model of Lewis lung carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Our studies suggest that combining a TLR9 agonist with an anti-TLR2 antibody, which eliminates immunosuppressive factors from the tumor environment, is critical for an effective anti-metastatic immunotherapy.

Timing is critical for an effective anti-metastatic immunotherapy: the decisive role of IFNγ/STAT1-mediated activation of autophagy

Background

Immunotherapy is often recommended as an adjuvant treatment to reduce the chance of cancer recurrence or metastasis. Interestingly, timing is very important for a successful immunotherapy against metastasis, although the precise mechanism is still unknown.

Methods and Findings

Using a mouse model of melanoma metastasis induced by intravenous injection of B16-F10 cells, we investigated the mechanism responsible for the diverse efficacy of the prophylactic or therapeutic TLR4 and TLR9 agonist complex against metastasis. We found that the activation of TLR4 and TLR9 prevented, but did not reverse, metastasis because the potency of this combination was neither sufficient to overcome the tumor cell-educated immune tolerance nor to induce efficacious autophagy in tumor cells. The prophylactic application of the complex promoted antimetastatic immunity, leading to the autophagy-associated death of melanoma cells via IFNγ/STAT1 activation and attenuated tumor metastasis. IFNγ neutralization reversed the prophylactic benefit induced by the complex by suppressing STAT1 activation and attenuating autophagy in mice. However, the therapeutic application of the complex did not suppress metastasis because the complex could not reverse tumor cell-induced STAT3 activation and neither activate IFNγ/STAT1 signaling and autophagy. Suppressing STAT3 activation with the JAK/STAT antagonist AG490 restored the antimetastatic effect of the TLR4/9 agonist complex. Activation of autophagy after tumor inoculation by using rapamycin, with or without the TLR4/9 agonist complex, could suppress metastasis.

Conclusion and Significance

Our studies suggest that activation of IFNγ/STAT1 signaling and induction of autophagy are critical for an efficacious anti-metastatic immunotherapy and that autophagy activators may overcome the timing barrier for immunotherapy against metastasis.

Ten years of progress in vaccination against cancer: the need to counteract cancer evasion by dual targeting in future therapies

Although cancer immunology has made vigorous progress over the last decade, its future remains uncertain. Tumors have clearly proved subject to immune surveillance, leading to antigenic editing, and means of activating both T and B arms of the immune system have been devised. Therapeutic vaccination and monoclonal antibody therapy have so far proved disappointing, because tumors prove adept at evasion from immune control. Dual targeting could well counteract evasion, provided that the two targets are independent and are attacked simultaneously. This stage has nearly but not quite been reached in several forms of immunotherapy, particularly of B-cell cancers, although such treatment also carries hazards.

A tritherapy combination of a fusion protein vaccine with immune-modulating doses of sequential chemotherapies in an optimized regimen completely eradicates large tumors in mice

Tumor-induced immunosuppression plays a critical role in both impeding tumor-specific immune responses and limiting the effects of cancer immunotherapy. Analyses of regulatory cells recruited during the growth of the E7-expressing tumor, TC-1, revealed a high percentage of regulatory T cells (Tregs) as well as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in spleens and tumors. In this study, we proposed that treatment with immune-modulating doses of cyclophosphamide (CTX) and all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) would result in a beneficial tumor microenvironment with the suppression of Tregs and MDSCs and, thus, enhance the effect of a human papillomavirus protein vaccine. Our results showed that CTX preconditioning and persistent ATRA treatment along with the vaccine achieved long-term survival and induced long-term memory responses. However, the effect of the antitumor response sharply declined when the tritherapy was initiated after the optimal therapeutic time. The more intensive regimen could rescue the effect of the tritherapy accompanied by the decreased percentage of Tregs and MDSCs in spleens and tumors. Besides, a favorable host environment was created by the reduced secretion of interleukin-10 and 6 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the tumor niche and decreased the expression of phosphorylation-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 of TC-1 tumors. Our data shed light on the immune-modulating doses of sequential chemoimmunotherapeutic strategy targeting not only the tumor but also its microenvironment, which suggests a potential clinical benefit for the immunotherapy of HPV-associated malignancies.