1
|
Du Y, Gu B, Shi L, She Y, Zhao Q, Gao S. Data-Driven Molecular Typing: A New Frontier in Esophageal Cancer Management. Cancer Med 2025; 14:e70730. [PMID: 40018789 PMCID: PMC11868787 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2025] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/01/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a predominant and highly lethal form of esophageal cancer, with a five-year survival rate below 20%. Despite advancements, most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting effective treatment options. Multi-omics integration, encompassing somatic genomic alterations, inherited genetic mutations, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and single-cell sequencing, has enabled the identification of distinct molecular subtypes of ESCC. METHOD This article systematically reviewed the current status of molecular subtyping of ESCC based on big data, summarized unique subtypes with differing treatment responses and prognostic outcomes. RESULT Key findings included subtype-specific genetic mutations, signaling pathway alterations, and metabolomic profiles, which offer novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Furthermore, this review discusses the link between molecular subtypes and immunotherapy efficacy, chemotherapy response, and drug development. CONCLUSION These insights highlight the potential of omics-based molecular typing to transform ESCC management and facilitate personalized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Du
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital (College of Clinical Medicine) of Henan University of Science and TechnologyCancer HospitalLuoyangHenanChina
| | - Bianli Gu
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital (College of Clinical Medicine) of Henan University of Science and TechnologyCancer HospitalLuoyangHenanChina
| | - Linlin Shi
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital (College of Clinical Medicine) of Henan University of Science and TechnologyCancer HospitalLuoyangHenanChina
| | - Yong She
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for CancerSun Yat‐Sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Qi Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for CancerSun Yat‐Sen University Cancer CenterGuangzhouGuangdongChina
| | - Shegan Gao
- Henan Key Laboratory of Microbiome and Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Henan Key Laboratory of Cancer Epigenetics, The First Affiliated Hospital (College of Clinical Medicine) of Henan University of Science and TechnologyCancer HospitalLuoyangHenanChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen D, Xu W, Wen Y, Tan X, Liu J. Causal relationship analysis between 35 blood/urine metabolites and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Mendelian randomization combined meta-analysis study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e39248. [PMID: 39121258 PMCID: PMC11315488 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000039248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition worldwide. Despite numerous studies on GERD, the causal relationships between blood/urine metabolites and GERD remain unclear. This study aims to explore the causal relationships between GERD and 35 blood/urine metabolites. In this study, we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses for 35 blood/urine metabolites with GERD phenotypes from the FinnGen R10 and UKB databases separately. We then performed a meta-analysis of the inverse variance weighted results from the 2 MR analyses and applied multiple corrections to the significant P values from the meta-analysis. Finally, we conducted reverse causality validation for the corrected positive blood/urine metabolite phenotypes with GERD. After conducting MR analysis combined with meta-analysis and performing multiple corrections, we found significant positive causal associations between only 3 blood/urine metabolites and GERD, with no significant reverse associations. Among them, 2 are risk factors for the occurrence of GERD: alanine aminotransferase levels (odds ratio (OR) = 1.120, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.064-1.180, P = .0005) and urate levels (OR = 1.095, 95% CI = 1.044-1.147, P = .005). Additionally, sex hormone-binding globulin levels are protective against GERD (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.896-0.961, P = .0009). Elevated levels of the metabolites alanine aminotransferase and urate are associated with an increased risk of GERD, identifying them as risk factors for the condition. In contrast, higher levels of SHBG are linked to a decreased risk of GERD, indicating that SHBG is a protective factor against the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daolei Chen
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, First People’s Hospital of Kunming City & Calmette Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Wanxian Xu
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, First People’s Hospital of Kunming City & Calmette Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Ying Wen
- The First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
| | - Xiaolan Tan
- Kunming University of Arts and Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, First People’s Hospital of Kunming City & Calmette Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
- Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomaschewski M, Hummel R, Petrova E, Knief J, Wellner UF, Keck T, Bausch D. Impact of postoperative TNM stages after neoadjuvant therapy on prognosis of adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction tumours. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:1429-1439. [PMID: 29632424 PMCID: PMC5889823 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i13.1429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare prognostic relevance of postoperative tumour/node/metastasis (TMN) stages between patients with and without neoadjuvant treatment.
METHODS Data from patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastro-oesophageal junction (AEG) who had undergone surgical resection at a single German university centre were retrospectively analysed. Patients with or without neoadjuvant preoperative treatment were selected by exact matching based on preoperative staging. Standard assessment of preoperative (c)TNM stage was based on endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen, according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control classification system. Patients with cT1cN0cM0 and cT2cN0cM0 stages were excluded from the study, as these patients are generally not recommended for pretreatment. Long-term survival among the various postoperative TNM stages was compared between the groups of patients with or without neoadjuvant treatment. For statistical assessments, a P-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS The study included a total of 174 patients. The group of patients who had received preoperative neoadjuvant treatment included more cases of AEG (Siewert) type 1 carcinoma (P < 0.001), and consequently oesophagectomy was performed more frequently among these patients (P < 0.001). The two groups (with or without preoperative neoadjuvant treatment) had comparable preoperative T stages, but the group of patients with preoperative neoadjuvant treatment presented a higher rate of preoperative N-positive disease (P = 0.020). Overall long-term survival was not different between the two groups of patients according to tumours of different AEG classifications, receipt of oesophagectomy or gastrectomy, nor between patients with similar postoperative TNM stage, resection margin and grading. However, an improvement of long-term survival was found for patients with nodal down-staging after neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.053).
CONCLUSION The prognostic relevance of postoperative TNM stages is similar for AEG in patients with or without neoadjuvant preoperative treatment, but treatment-related nodal down-staging prognosticates longer-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Thomaschewski
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Richard Hummel
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Petrova
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Juliana Knief
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Ulrich Friedrich Wellner
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Tobias Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| | - Dirk Bausch
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck 23538, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu ZH, Zhang Q, Ding YJ, Ren YH, Yang HP, Xi Q, Cheng YN, Miao GL, Liu HK, Li CX, Yan WQ, Li Y, Xue Z, Zhang L, Li XY, Zhao CL, Da Y, Wu XZ, Chen JQ, Zhang R, Li ZG. Overexpression of CHD1L is associated with poor survival and aggressive tumor biology in esophageal carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:74178-74187. [PMID: 29088777 PMCID: PMC5650332 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 06/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Esophageal carcinoma (EC) is a malignancy with high metastatic potential. Chromosomal helicase/ATPase DNA binding protein 1-like (CHD1L) gene is a newly identified oncogene located at Chr1q21, and it is amplified in many solid tumors. However, the status of CHD1L protein expression in EC and its clinical significance is uncertain. This study was designed to investigate the significance of CHD1L expression in human EC and its biological function in EC cells. The expression of CHD1L was examined by immunohistochemistry in 191 surgically resected ECs. The associations between CHD1L expression and clinical pathological parameters and the prognostic value of CHD1L were analyzed. Western blot analysis showed that CHD1L was overexpressed in EC cell lines. In addition, positive CHD1L expression was strongly related to advanced clinical stage (P<0.01), and lymph node metastasis (P<0.01) of EC. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that high expression of CHD1L may result in poor prognosis of EC patients (P<0.01), and multivariate analysis showed that CHD1L overexpression was an independent predictor of overall survival. Furthermore, suppression of CHD1L in EC cells increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation invasion ability. Our results suggest that CHD1L is a target oncogene with the potential to serve as a novel prognostic biomarker in EC pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Han Liu
- Nankai Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Qi Zhang
- Institute of Integrative Medicine Therapy for Acute Abdominal Diseases of Tianjin, Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, P. R. China.,Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Yi-Jie Ding
- First Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Ying-Hui Ren
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Hui-Peng Yang
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Qing Xi
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Ying-Nan Cheng
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Guo-Lin Miao
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Hong-Kun Liu
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Cai-Xia Li
- Institute of Integrative Medicine Therapy for Acute Abdominal Diseases of Tianjin, Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Wen-Qiang Yan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nankai Hospital, Nankai District, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Yan Li
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Zhenyi Xue
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Lijuan Zhang
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Xin-Ye Li
- General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Chen-Long Zhao
- General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Yurong Da
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Xian-Zhong Wu
- Institute of Integrative Medicine Therapy for Acute Abdominal Diseases of Tianjin, Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, P. R. China
| | - Jun-Qiang Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Fujian Provincial Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, P.R. China
| | - Rongxin Zhang
- Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.,Laboratory of Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Immunology, Key Laboratory of Immune Microenvironment and Diseases of Educational Ministry of China, Basic Medical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Gang Li
- Hainan Cancer Hospital, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou City, P.R. China.,General Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, P.R. China.,Institute of Integrative Medicine Therapy for Acute Abdominal Diseases of Tianjin, Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
SEOM Clinical Guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer (2016). Clin Transl Oncol 2016; 18:1179-1186. [PMID: 27900538 PMCID: PMC5138258 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1577-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal cancer (EC) is an aggressive tumor that represents the 6th most common cause of cancer death worldwide. The estimated incidence in Spain is 2090 cases/year. Two main pathological subtypes exist, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The main differences between them are localization and underlying factors which are the principal cause of the recent incidence changes observed in west countries. Staging techniques and treatment options which combine surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, reflected the high complexity of the EC management. An undeniably multidisciplinary approach is, therefore, required. In this guide, we review the status of current diagnosis and treatment, define evidence and propose recommendations.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang K, Johnson A, Ali SM, Klempner SJ, Bekaii-Saab T, Vacirca JL, Khaira D, Yelensky R, Chmielecki J, Elvin JA, Lipson D, Miller VA, Stephens PJ, Ross JS. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Esophageal Adenocarcinomas Reveals Similarities and Differences. Oncologist 2015; 20:1132-9. [PMID: 26336083 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 06/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) and esophageal adenocarcinomas (EACs) account for >95% of esophageal malignancies and represent a major global health burden. ESCC is the dominant histology globally but represents a minority of U.S. cases, with EAC accounting for the majority of U.S. CASES The patient outcomes for advanced ESCC and EAC are poor, and new therapeutic options are needed. Using a sensitive sequencing assay, we compared the genomic profiles of ESCC and EAC with attention to identification of therapeutically relevant genomic alterations. METHODS Next-generation sequencing-based comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries to a median coverage depth of >650× for all coding exons of 315 cancer-related genes plus selected introns from 28 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. Results from a single sample were evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GAs) including point mutations, short insertions and deletions, gene amplifications, homozygous deletions, and fusions/rearrangements. Clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGAs) were defined as alterations linked to approved drugs and those under evaluation in mechanism-driven clinical trials. RESULTS There were no significant differences by sex for either tumor type, and the median age for all patients was 63 years. All ESCCs and EACs were at an advanced stage at the time of sequencing. All 71 ESCCs and 231 EACs featured GAs on profiling, with 522 GAs in ESCC (7.4 per sample) and 1,303 GAs in EAC (5.6 per sample). The frequency of clinically relevant GAs in ESCC was 94% (2.6 per sample) and 93% in EAC (2.7 per sample). CRGAs occurring more frequently in EAC included KRAS (23% EAC vs. 6% ESCC) and ERBB2 (23% EAC vs. 3% ESCC). ESCC samples were enriched for CRGA in PIK3CA (24% ESCC vs. 10% EAC), PTEN (11% ESCC vs. 4% EAC), and NOTCH1 (17% ESCC vs. 3% EAC). Other GAs that differed significantly between histologic tumor types included SMAD4 (14% EAC vs. 1% ESCC), RB1 (14% ESCC vs. 2% EAC), SOX2 (18% ESCC vs. 1% EAC), and NFE2L2 (24% ESCC vs. 1% EAC). CONCLUSION ESCC and EAC share similarly high frequencies of overall and clinically relevant genomic alterations; however, the profiles of genomic alterations in the two diseases differ widely, with KRAS and ERBB2 far more frequently altered in EAC compared with ESCC and with mammalian target of rapamycin (MTOR) pathway genes (PIK3CA and PTEN) and NOTCH1 more frequently altered in ESCC compared with EAC. Comprehensive genomic profiling highlights the promise of identifying clinically relevant genomic alterations in both ESCC and EAC and suggests new avenues for molecularly directed therapies in esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Wang
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Adrienne Johnson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Siraj M Ali
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Tanios Bekaii-Saab
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Vacirca
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Depinder Khaira
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Roman Yelensky
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Juliann Chmielecki
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Julia A Elvin
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Doron Lipson
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Vincent A Miller
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Philip J Stephens
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Ross
- Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA; The Ohio State University-James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA; National Translational Research Group, New York, New York, USA; Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hong DS, Rosen P, Lockhart AC, Fu S, Janku F, Kurzrock R, Khan R, Amore B, Caudillo I, Deng H, Hwang YC, Loberg R, Ngarmchamnanrith G, Beaupre DM, Lee P. A first-in-human study of AMG 208, an oral MET inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. Oncotarget 2015; 6:18693-706. [PMID: 26155941 PMCID: PMC4621921 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2015] [Accepted: 05/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This first-in-human study evaluated AMG 208, a small-molecule MET inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS Three to nine patients were enrolled into one of seven AMG 208 dose cohorts (25, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 mg). Patients received AMG 208 orally on days 1 and days 4-28 once daily. The primary objectives were to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AMG 208. RESULTS Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Six dose-limiting toxicities were observed: grade 3 increased aspartate aminotransferase (200 mg), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (200 mg), grade 4 acute myocardial infarction (300 mg), grade 3 prolonged QT (300 mg), and two cases of grade 3 hypertension (400 mg). The MTD was not reached. The most frequent grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was anemia (n = 3) followed by hypertension, prolonged QT, and thrombocytopenia (two patients each). AMG 208 exposure increased linearly with dose; mean plasma half-life estimates were 21.4-68.7 hours. One complete response (prostate cancer) and three partial responses (two in prostate cancer, one in kidney cancer) were observed. CONCLUSIONS In this study, AMG 208 had manageable toxicities and showed evidence of antitumor activity, particularly in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Rosen
- Tower Cancer Research Foundation, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
| | | | - Siqing Fu
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Rabia Khan
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Lee
- Tower Cancer Research Foundation, Beverly Hills, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jardim DLF, de Melo Gagliato D, Falchook GS, Janku F, Zinner R, Wheler JJ, Subbiah V, Piha-Paul SA, Fu S, Murphy MB, Ajani J, Tang C, Hess K, Hamilton SR, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Kurzrock R, Meric-Bernstam F, Hong DS. MET aberrations and c-MET inhibitors in patients with gastric and esophageal cancers in a phase I unit. Oncotarget 2015; 5:1837-45. [PMID: 24742823 PMCID: PMC4039117 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.1828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
We sought to investigate the demographics and tumor-associated features in patients with gastroesophageal (GE) malignancies referred to our Phase I Program who had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from archival or new biopsies tested for MET mutation and/or amplification. MET amplification was found in 5 of 76 (6.6%) patients (3/34 [8.8%] esophageal, 2/26 [7.7%] gastric and none in 22 gastroesophageal junction cancers). The only MET mutation detected in 3 of 41 (7.3%) patients was N375S. No demographic and histologic characteristics were associated with specific MET abnormalities. Median overall survival was 3 and 5 months for patients with and without a MET alteration, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 5.5; P=.14). Sixteen of 81 (20%) patients were enrolled in a c-MET inhibitor trial. Best responses were stable disease in 3 patients (19%), including a patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma that remained on the trial for 9.9 months (wild-type for MET abnormality). All tumors with MET abnormality (n=3) progressed on a c-MET inhibitor in fewer than 2 months. In conclusion, MET abnormalities can be found in a small group of patients with GE adenocarcinoma and further studies are necessary to better characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of MET alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis L Fontes Jardim
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jardim DLF, Tang C, Gagliato DDM, Falchook GS, Hess K, Janku F, Fu S, Wheler JJ, Zinner RG, Naing A, Tsimberidou AM, Holla V, Li MM, Roy-Chowdhuri S, Luthra R, Salgia R, Kurzrock R, Meric-Bernstam F, Hong DS. Analysis of 1,115 patients tested for MET amplification and therapy response in the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20:6336-45. [PMID: 25326232 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess MET amplification among different cancers, association with clinical factors and genetic aberrations and targeted therapy response modifications. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN From May 2010 to November 2012, samples from patients with advanced tumors referred to the MD Anderson Phase I Clinic were analyzed for MET gene amplification by FISH. Patient demographic, histologic characteristics, molecular characteristics, and outcomes in phase I protocols were compared per MET amplification status. RESULTS Of 1,115 patients, 29 (2.6%) had MET amplification. The highest prevalence was in adrenal (2 of 13; 15%) and renal (4 of 28; 14%) tumors, followed by gastroesophageal (6%), breast (5%), and ovarian cancers (4%). MET amplification was associated with adenocarcinomas (P = 0.007), high-grade tumors (P = 0.003), more sites of metastasis, higher BRAF mutation, and PTEN loss (all P < 0.05). Median overall survival was 7.23 and 8.62 months for patients with and without a MET amplification, respectively (HR = 1.12; 95% confidence intervals, 0.83-1.85; P = 0.29). Among the 20 patients with MET amplification treated on a phase I protocol, 4 (20%) achieved a partial response with greatest response rate on agents targeting angiogenesis (3 of 6, 50%). No patient treated with a c-MET inhibitor (0 of 7) achieved an objective response. CONCLUSION MET amplification was detected in 2.6% of patients with solid tumors and was associated with adenocarcinomas, high-grade histology, and higher metastatic burden. Concomitant alterations in additional pathways (BRAF mutation and PTEN loss) and variable responses on targeted therapies, including c-MET inhibitors, suggest that further studies are needed to target this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis L F Jardim
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Debora De Melo Gagliato
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gerald S Falchook
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer J Wheler
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ralph G Zinner
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vijaykumar Holla
- Institute for Personalized Cancer Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marylin M Li
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Raja Luthra
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, Zhang W, Wang J, Xu L, Zhou Y, Ma X, Liu L, Zhao Z, Huang X, Fan J, Dong L, Chen G, Ma L, Yang J, Chen L, He M, Li M, Zhuang X, Huang K, Qiu K, Yin G, Guo G, Feng Q, Chen P, Wu Z, Wu J, Ma L, Zhao J, Luo L, Fu M, Xu B, Chen B, Li Y, Tong T, Wang M, Liu Z, Lin D, Zhang X, Yang H, Wang J, Zhan Q. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature 2014; 509:91-5. [PMID: 24670651 DOI: 10.1038/nature13176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 823] [Impact Index Per Article: 74.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2013] [Accepted: 02/25/2014] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer is one of the most aggressive cancers and is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Approximately 70% of global oesophageal cancer cases occur in China, with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) being the histopathological form in the vast majority of cases (>90%). Currently, there are limited clinical approaches for the early diagnosis and treatment of ESCC, resulting in a 10% five-year survival rate for patients. However, the full repertoire of genomic events leading to the pathogenesis of ESCC remains unclear. Here we describe a comprehensive genomic analysis of 158 ESCC cases, as part of the International Cancer Genome Consortium research project. We conducted whole-genome sequencing in 17 ESCC cases and whole-exome sequencing in 71 cases, of which 53 cases, plus an additional 70 ESCC cases not used in the whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing, were subjected to array comparative genomic hybridization analysis. We identified eight significantly mutated genes, of which six are well known tumour-associated genes (TP53, RB1, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, NFE2L2), and two have not previously been described in ESCC (ADAM29 and FAM135B). Notably, FAM135B is identified as a novel cancer-implicated gene as assayed for its ability to promote malignancy of ESCC cells. Additionally, MIR548K, a microRNA encoded in the amplified 11q13.3-13.4 region, is characterized as a novel oncogene, and functional assays demonstrate that MIR548K enhances malignant phenotypes of ESCC cells. Moreover, we have found that several important histone regulator genes (MLL2 (also called KMT2D), ASH1L, MLL3 (KMT2C), SETD1B, CREBBP and EP300) are frequently altered in ESCC. Pathway assessment reveals that somatic aberrations are mainly involved in the Wnt, cell cycle and Notch pathways. Genomic analyses suggest that ESCC and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma share some common pathogenic mechanisms, and ESCC development is associated with alcohol drinking. This study has explored novel biological markers and tumorigenic pathways that would greatly improve therapeutic strategies for ESCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongmei Song
- 1] State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [2]
| | - Lin Li
- 1] BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China [2]
| | - Yunwei Ou
- 1] State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China [2] Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China [3]
| | - Zhibo Gao
- 1] BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China [2]
| | - Enmin Li
- 1] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for High Cancer Incidence Coastal Chaoshan Area, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China [2]
| | - Xiangchun Li
- 1] BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China [2]
| | - Weimin Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jiaqian Wang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Liyan Xu
- Institute of Oncologic Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Yong Zhou
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Xiaojuan Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lingyan Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zitong Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xuanlin Huang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Jing Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Lijia Dong
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Gang Chen
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Liying Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jie Yang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Longyun Chen
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Minghui He
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Miao Li
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Xuehan Zhuang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Kai Huang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Kunlong Qiu
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | | | - Guangwu Guo
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Qiang Feng
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Peishan Chen
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Zhiyong Wu
- Department of Tumor Surgery, Shantou Central Hospital, Affiliated Shantou Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Jianyi Wu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology for High Cancer Incidence Coastal Chaoshan Area, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Ling Ma
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Jinyang Zhao
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Longhai Luo
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Ming Fu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Bainan Xu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Bo Chen
- Institute of Oncologic Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, China
| | - Yingrui Li
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Tong Tong
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Mingrong Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Zhihua Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Dongxin Lin
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| | - Xiuqing Zhang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Huanming Yang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Jun Wang
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, Guangdong 518083, China
| | - Qimin Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Cancer Institute and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China
| |
Collapse
|