Sorafenib With and Without Transarterial Chemoembolization for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Retrospective Analysis

A real-world study of tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with or without chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with main portal vein invasion

BACKGROUND

Although systemic therapies are recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with main portal vein (MPV) invasion and preserved liver function, the outcome is limited. In the real-world, chemoembolization is a commonly used local treatment for advanced HCC.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the additional chemoembolization treatment yields survival benefits compared to systemic therapy for HCC patients with MPV invasion and preserved liver function (Child-Pugh score ≤ B7) in a real-world study from multiple centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, 91 consecutive HCC patients with MPV invasion who received either systemic medical therapy (i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, S group, n = 43) or in combination with chemoembolization treatment (S-T group, n = 48) from five centers were enrolled in the study. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment response. Adverse events (AEs) related to treatment were also recorded. Survival curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The mean number of chemoembolization sessions per patient was 2.1 (range 1-3). The median OS was 10.0 months and 8.0 months in the S-T group and S group, respectively (P = 0.254). The median PFS between the two groups was similar (4.0 months vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.404). The disease control rate between the S-T and S groups were comparable (60.4% vs. 62.8%, P = 0.816). Although no chemoembolization-related deaths occurred, 13 grade 3-4 AEs occurred in the S-T group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the real-world study demonstrated that additional chemoembolization treatment did not yield survival benefits compared to TKIs plus anti-PD-1 immunotherapy for the overall patients with advanced HCC and MPV invasion.

The second-line treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with CalliSpheres drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization combined with regorafenib: A safety and efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with regorafenib in the second-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 34 patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that had progressed after first-line treatment in Linyi Tumor Hospital from October 2019 to June 2021. These patients were divided into observation group (n = 15) and control group (n = 19) based on their treatment plans, who were respectively treated with regorafenib alone and regorafenib combined with DEB-TACE. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), and the progression-free survival (PFS) and the overall survival (OS) were calculated; the factors influencing PFS and OS of patients were analyzed by the Cox proportional hazards model; and the adverse reactions to the treatments were observed and recorded.

RESULTS

After 2 months of treatment, the ORR and the DCR of the observation group were 73.3% (11/15) and 86.7% (13/15) respectively, both higher than 10.5% (2/19) and 47.4% (9/19) of the control group. Their differences are statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of regorafenib-related adverse reactions including hand-foot skin reactions, fatigue, hypertension, diarrhea, and proteinuria between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the observation group, the main adverse reactions to DEB-TACE such as fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting were relieved after symptomatic treatment, and no serious complications such as ectopic embolization of CalliSpheres drug-eluting beads occurred. As of July 31, 2022, the median follow-up time was 12.5 months, and the average was (14.00 ± 5.69) months. The median PFS was 9 months in the observation group, and 6 months in the control group, presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05), and the median OS was 18 months in the observation group, and 12 months in the control group, also presenting a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The results of monofactor prognostic analysis showed that Child grade, AFP level, and treatment method had an influence on the PFS and the OS of liver cancer patients receiving regorafenib second-line treatment (P < 0.05), and the results of multifactor prognostic analysis showed that child grade and treatment method independently influenced the PFS of patients, while treatment method independently influenced the OS of patients (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DEB-TACE combined with regorafenib is safe and feasible in the treatment of unresectable HCC, with good efficacy and mild adverse reactions.

Sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization vs sorafenib alone for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although the past decade has seen remarkable advances in treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the dismal overall prognosis still envelops HCC patients. Several comparative trials have been conducted to study whether transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) could improve clinical outcomes in patients receiving sorafenib for advanced HCC; however, the findings have been inconsistent.

AIM

To study the potential synergies and safety of sorafenib plus TACE vs sorafenib alone for treating advanced HCC, by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A systematic literature search was conducted using the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Data included in the present work were collected from patients diagnosed with advanced HCC receiving sorafenib plus TACE or sorafenib alone. Data synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager software.

RESULTS

The present study included 2780 patients from five comparative clinical trials (1 was randomized control trial and 4 were retrospective studies). It was found that patients receiving sorafenib plus TACE had better prognoses in terms of overall survival (OS), with a combined hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.46-0.93, P = 0.02, n = 2780]. Consistently, progression free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) differed significantly between the sorafenib plus TACE arm and sorafenib arm (PFS: HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.40-0.96, P = 0.03, n = 443; TTP: HR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.64-0.83, P < 0.00001, n = 2451). Disease control rate (DCR) was also significantly increased by combination therapy (risk ratio = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.02-1.81, P = 0.04, n = 641). Regarding safety, the incidence of any adverse event (AE) was increased due to the addition of TACE; however, no significant difference was found in grade ≥ 3 AEs.

CONCLUSION

The combination of sorafenib with TACE has superior efficacy to sorafenib monotherapy, as evidenced by prolonged OS, PFS, and TTP, as well as increased DCR. Additional high-quality trials are essential to further validate the clinical benefit of this combination in the treatment of advanced HCC.

Transarterial interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without anti-PD-1 antibodies as initial treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: a single-center retrospective study

Transarterial interventional therapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and anti-Pd-1 antibodies (triplet regimen) has shown promising results in advanced HCC. However, the clinical utility of the triplet regimen in patients with HCC and major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains unclear. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the triplet regimen versus transarterial interventional therapy combined with TKIs (double regimen) for such patients. Thirty-nine patients treated with the triplet regimen were retrospectively compared with 37 patients treated with the double regimen. The objective response rate (ORR), the response rate of PVTT treatment, and safety were observed; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan‒Meier method and log-rank test. Predictors of survival were identified using multivariate analysis. Median OS and median PFS were significantly improved in the Triplet Group compared with the Double Group (482 vs. 310 days; 208 vs. 85 days). The ORR and the response rate of PVTT were significantly higher in the Triplet Group than in the Double Group (59% vs. 35%; 62% vs. 35%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups (33% vs. 21%). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (10%) in the Triplet Group and hand-foot syndrome (14%) in the Double Group. Multivariable analysis showed that treatment method and PVTT treatment response were significant predictors of OS. The triplet regimen showed superiority over the doublet regimen in improving OS and PFS and had acceptable safety in patients with HCC and major PVTT.

External radiotherapy combined with sorafenib has better efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a very low resectable rate. This meta-analysis aimed to compare efficacy of three combination strategies in treatment of advanced unresectable HCC with a view of guiding future selection of the best combination therapy for sorafenib and local therapy. A search was conducted to identify relevant literature published between April 2013 and May 2022, and then compared efficacy of sorafenib combined with external radiotherapy (SOF + RT), sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolization (SOF + TACE), sorafenib with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (SOF + HAIC), sorafenib (SOF), external radiotherapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) were studied and analyzed. Finally, the results were statistically analyzed using R 3.5.3 software and Stata/SE 15.0 software. A total of 46 studies, involving 7595 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of seven related treatment interventions revealed that the combination therapy had significantly higher efficacy than monotherapies. Among the combination therapies, SOF + RT was associated with the best OS and PFS rates, and the least adverse events compared to the other treatment modalities. The efficacy of combination therapy was better than monotherapy. In combination therapy, the overall survival time and progression-free survival time of SOF + RT were longer, and the adverse reactions were less. Therefore, SOF + RT may be the best choice for sorafenib combined with local therapy.

Irradiation stent with 125 I plus TACE versus sorafenib plus TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma with major portal vein tumor thrombosis: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and Vp4 [main trunk] portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remains limited due to posttreatment liver failure. We aimed to assess the efficacy of irradiation stent placement with 125 I plus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (ISP-TACE) compared to sorafenib plus TACE (Sora-TACE) in these patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, participants with HCC and Vp4 PVTT without extrahepatic metastases were enrolled from November 2018 to July 2021 at 16 medical centers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were hepatic function, time to symptomatic progression, patency of portal vein, disease control rate, and treatment safety.

RESULTS

Of 105 randomized participants, 51 were assigned to the ISP-TACE group, and 54 were assigned to the Sora-TACE group. The median OS was 9.9 months versus 6.3 months (95% CI: 0.27-0.82; P =0.01). Incidence of acute hepatic decompensation was 16% (8 of 51) versus 33% (18 of 54) ( P =0.036). The time to symptomatic progression was 6.6 months versus 4.2 months (95% CI: 0.38-0.93; P =0.037). The median stent patency was 7.2 months (interquartile range, 4.7-9.3) in the ISP-TACE group. The disease control rate was 86% (44 of 51) versus 67% (36 of 54) ( P =0.018). Incidences of adverse events at least grade 3 were comparable between the safety populations of the two groups: 16 of 49 (33%) versus 18 of 50 (36%) ( P =0.73).

CONCLUSION

Irradiation stent placement plus TACE showed superior results compared with sorafenib plus TACE in prolonging OS in patients with HCC and Vp4 PVTT.

Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic-Related Delays in Chemoembolization on the Survival of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background and Aims

COVID-19 has led to potential delays in liver cancer treatment, which may have undesirable effects on the prognosis of patients. We aimed to quantify the COVID-19 pandemic impact on the survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted in patients with HCC who underwent TACE at a tertiary care center during the prelockdown (March to July 2019) and lockdown (March to July 2020) periods. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, functional status, and vital status were collected from the hospital medical records. The endpoints were TACE interval, treatment response, and survival after TACE. Cox proportional hazards regression determined the significant preoperative factors influencing survival.

Results

Compared to prelockdown, a significant delay occurred during the lockdown in repeated TACE treatments (76.7 vs. 63.5 days, P=0.007). The trend suggested a significant decrease in patients with HCC in the repeated TACE group (-33.3%). After screening, 145 patients were included (prelockdown (n = 87), lockdown (n = 58)). There was no significant difference in the 1-month objective response rate between the prelockdown and lockdown groups (65.5% vs. 64.4%, P=1.00). During follow-up, 56 (64.4%) and 34 (58.6%) deaths occurred in the prelockdown and lockdown groups, respectively (P=0.600). Multivariate analysis revealed no association between the lockdown group and decreased survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.57-1.35, P=0.555).

Conclusions

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on liver cancer care resulted in significant decreases and delays in repeated TACE treatments in 2020 compared to 2019. However, treatment delays did not seem to significantly impact survival.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) fulfills an important role in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Among the combination therapies, both lenvatinib and sorafenib combined with TACE are recommended as first-¬line treatments for uHCC. However, at present, limited data are available concerning the efficacy and safety of these two combination therapies in uHCC.

Methods

A detailed systematic search for studies on lenvatinib plus TACE (LEN+TACE) and sorafenib plus TACE (SOR+TACE) was conducted in the online databases PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Library. The outcome data including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), tumor response and adverse events (AEs), were independently extracted by two authors in a standardized way.

Results

One randomized controlled trial and five cohort studies with 598 patients (LEN+TACE: 261, SOR+TACE: 337) were included in the meta-analysis. A higher rate of odds ratio (OR) for the objective response rate (ORR) [OR: 3.63; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 1.89-6.95; I squared statistic (I2) = 57%, P < 0.001] and disease control rate (DCR) (OR: 3.78; 95% CI: 2.00-7.16; I2 = 52%, P = 0.0001) were observed in the LEN+SOR group compared with the SOR+TACE group. The LEN+TACE group also had significant longer OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.85; I2 = 1%, P = 0.001], PFS (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.38-0.62; I2 = 0%, P? 0.001) and TTP (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.45-0.84; I2 = 0%, P = 0.002) compared with the SOR+TACE group. The incidence of hypertension (OR: 3.05; 95% CI: 1.45-6.39; P = 0.003) and proteinuria (OR: 5.25; 95% CI: 1.73-15.89; P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the LEN+TACE group than SOR+TACE group, while LEN+TACE group exhibited a lower rate of hand-foot-skin reaction (HFSR) (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.95; P = 0.03) compared with the SOR+TACE group.

Conclusion

The combination therapy of LEN+TACE showed significant superiority compared with SOR+TACE in terms of its efficacy for patients with uHCC. SOR+TACE should be recommended as a replacement therapy when serious AEs occur during the administration of LEN+TACE as the combination therapy.

Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent subtype. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has recently been widely used for unresectable HCC (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the response of different agents in an uHCC setting. According to our results, TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC, with the highest ranking based on OS, PFS, and DCR rates and the second-best ranking based on ORR rates.

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the mainstay treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Here, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different agents across 41 studies (36 cohort studies and five RCTs) in 11,540 patients. Multiple RCTs and cohort studies were searched to evaluate TACE combined with different TKIs. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response. NMA used a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed. Further, heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed and agents were ranked. TACE plus lenvatinib provided the maximal OS (Rank probability: 0.7559), PFS (Rank probability: 0.8595), CR (Rank probability: 0.4179), and DCR (Rank probability: 0.3857). TACE plus anlotinib demonstrated the highest PR (p = 0.62649) and ORR (p = 0.51158). SD was more often associated with TACE plus sorafenib (Rank probability: 0.601685). TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC based on the highest ranking of OS, PFS, and DCR rates. However, given the lack of statistically significant OS benefit, shared decision making should include other TKIs as acceptable alternatives.

Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) have dismal prognosis and are referred to systemic treatment or palliation. To investigate the outcomes of patients with HCC and MVI undergoing the associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) procedure. Demographics and operative data were retrospectively reviewed. All types of hepatectomies and all types of ALPPS modifications were included. MVI was categorized according to the Japanese Liver Cancer Study Group classification. 28 patients were included. Viral aetiology was the most common cause of chronic liver disease (89.3%). 85.7% of patients were cirrhotic, with a median MELD score of 9 (7-10). MVI of the hepatic veins or inferior vena cava was diagnosed in 46.4% of patients while portal vein involvement was present in 64.2% of cases. Four patients (14.2%) were diagnosed with bile duct involvement. No patients died after Step 1 while complications occurred in 21.4% of cases. Following step 2, 3 patients (11.5%) died and 20 (69.2%) developed complications. Grade B and C post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 57.6% and 11.5% of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 18 months (7-35), median survival was 22 months (3-40). Eleven patients (39.3%) recurred. Median disease-free survival was 15 months (5-26). The ALPPS procedure is an extreme rescue approach in otherwise inoperable advanced HCC with MVI. The procedure is associated with high morbidity and mortality and patients' selection is pivotal. Oncological outcomes are safe and should be further investigated.

Efficacy and safety of endovascular brachytherapy combined with transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with type III or IV portal vein tumor thrombosis

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) complicated with type III OR IV portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) and to further analyze the prognostic predictors for the patients with HCC and PVTT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 54 patients who were diagnosed with HCC complicated with type III or IV PVTT and received EVBT combined with modified TACE treatment from January 2017 to June 2019. Adverse events, treatment response, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and stent patency were analysed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment. The independent prognostic predictors of OS were also statistically analyzed by the cox regression model.

Results

No adverse events occurred in the enrolled patients receiving EVBT combined with TACE treatment. The objective response and disease control rates were 42.6% and 96.3% respectively within 4 weeks after the treatment. The median OS and PFS were 209 days and 138 days, respectively. Cumulative stent patency rate was 70.4% at the last follow-up. AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml, ECOG PS > 1, Child Pugh grade B, and non-hemihepatic HCC were independent risk predictors to evaluate the OS of HCC patient with type III or IV PVTT.

Conclusions

EVBT combined with TACE was a relatively effective and safe strategy to treat HCC patients with type III or IV PVTT.

Evaluation of D-TACE combined with endovascular brachytherapy for HCC with MPVTT

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus (MPVTT) may be able to have TACE through stent implantation into the portal vein with thrombosis to recover portal blood flow.

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare clinical results of conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE) and doxorubicin-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with endovascular brachytherapy in HCC patients with MPVTT.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective controlled study with follow-up dates spanning from Mar 2015 to Feb 2020. Patients with both HCC and MPVTT were divided into two groups. Portal vein stents with iodine-125 seed strands were implanted first; then, C-TACE or D-TACE was administered to all patients. Objective response rates were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were enrolled, with 13 in each group. During follow-up, the portal stent patency times were 112.3 ± 98.2 days in the C-TACE group and 101.7 ± 90.4 days in the D-TACE group. The time to disease progression was 42 days in the C-TACE group and 120 days in the D-TACE group (p=0.03). The overall survival time from the first intervention procedure was 216 days in the C-TACE group and 239 days in the D-TACE group (p=0.047). The D-TACE group was superior to the C-TACE group in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times.

CONCLUSION

Endovascular implantation of brachytherapy combined with TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients with MPVTT. This combination therapy may be helpful for survival benefits to patients with stage BCLC-C HCC.

CalliSpheres® microspheres drug-eluting bead transhepatic artery chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for the treatment of large liver cancer: a multi-center retrospective study

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres^® microspheres drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) combined with sorafenib in the treatment of large liver cancer.

METHOD

The study retrospectively analyzed 90 patients with large liver cancer. 42 patients who received DEB-TACE and sorafenib were included in the experimental group and 48 patients who received only DEB-TACE were included in the control group. The efficacy, TTP, OS and ARs were evaluated and further analysis was conducted on factors which might affect the prognosis.

RESULTS

As of June 2020. The median OS of the experimental group was significantly longer than that of the control group (18.6 months vs. 12.7 months), and the TTP was also longer in the experimental group (8.3 months vs. 6.9 months). Three months after the intervention, the ORR and DCR of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. The main ARs of the experimental group taking sorafenib included hand-foot syndrome, skin rash, diarrhea, fatigue, hypertension, and anorexia. And they could be alleviated through treatment of the symptoms. TACE-related ARs for both groups were fever, pain, nausea, and vomiting, and there was no significant difference. Logistic regression analysis showed that the combined sorafenib treatment was a protective factor improving the prognosis of patients with large liver cancer, and risk factors were the number of tumors and vascular invasion.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE combined with sorafenib is safe and well tolerated in the treatment of large liver cancer. It can improve the tumor control rate and prolong the survival time.

Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy with Modified FOLFOX as an Alternative Treatment Option in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Failed or Unsuitability for Transarterial Chemoembolization

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with modified FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) as an alternative treatment option in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with failed or unsuitability for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2018 to January 2020, 87 advanced HCC patients who progressed on TACE or were not eligible for TACE received HAIC treatment with modified FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, and adverse events graded according to CTCAE 5.0. Based on prognostic factors determined by multivariate analysis, a nomogram was developed to predict patient survival.

RESULTS

The median OS and PFS were 9.0 months (95%CI 7.6-10.4) and 3.7 months (95%CI 3.1-4.3), respectively. The objective response rate was 13.8%, with a disease control rate of 48.3%. Grade 3 adverse events were observed, such as infection (9.2%), thrombocytopenia (5.7%), hyperbilirubinemia (3.4%), abdominal pain (2.3%) and alanine aminotransferase increase (2.3%). Albumin, AST, and extrahepatic metastasis were incorporated to construct a new nomogram that could stratify patients into three prognostic subgroups, including low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, with significant differences in 9-month OS rates (71%, 42% and 6%, respectively; p< 0.001). The nomogram was better than the Okuda, AJCC, and CLIP staging systems for OS prediction.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the feasibility of HAIC with modified FOLFOX as an alternative treatment strategy for advanced HCC when TACE is ineffective or unsuitable.

Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Radiological Perspective

This is a narrative review of various treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a focus on recent updates in radiological treatments, as well as novel treatment concepts related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination therapies with locoregional treatments. Interventional radiologists have made efforts toward developing alternative and/or combination treatments for first-line systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC. Locoregional treatments with or without systemic therapy may be considered in the selected patients. Various treatment modalities for advanced HCC are emerging, and several randomized controlled trials, including those of combination treatments with immunotherapy, are ongoing.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate-advanced HCC.

METHODS

A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate-advanced HCC.

RESULTS

Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified. We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.88, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median OS ranged from 7.0 to 22.0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.9 to 18.0 months with sorafenib. The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.65-0.82, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median time to progression ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.1 to 2.8 months with sorafenib. The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI 0.25-0.80, P = .0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI 0.37-1.33, P = .0006) than sorafenib group. Hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events. The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.

CONCLUSION

Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate-advanced HCC. Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

In this open-label, single-center, randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04127396), participants with previously untreated HCC and type I-IV PVTT were randomized 1:1 to receive TACE plus lenvatinib (arm L; orally once daily, 12 mg for body weight ≥60 kg or 8 mg for body weight <60 kg) or TACE plus sorafenib (arm S; 400 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles). The primary end point was time-to-progression (TTP; time from randomization to disease progression) and secondary end points included objective response rate and toxicity. Prognostic factors were evaluated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Between December 30, 2018 and May 31, 2020, 64 patients were randomized (arm L, n = 32; arm S, n = 32); most patients had type I/II PVTT (71.9%), and the median target tumor diameter was 9.8 cm (range, 3.8-21.8). After a median follow-up of 16.1 months, patients in arm L had a higher median TTP (4.7 vs 3.1 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.95; P = .029) and objective response rate (53.1% vs 25.0%, P = .039) versus arm S. Multivariable analysis showed that TACE plus lenvatinib was significantly associated with higher TTP versus TACE plus sorafenib (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28-0.90; P = .021). Comparable safety profiles were observed in arms L and S.

CONCLUSIONS

TACE plus lenvatinib was safe, well tolerated, and had favorable efficacy versus TACE plus sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC with PVTT and large tumor burden.

LAY SUMMARY

Hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus has a poor prognosis. In addition, most phase 3 trials of drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma exclude patients with major portal vein invasion, and treatment options for these patients are limited. Transarterial chemoembolization has shown promising efficacy in these patients, especially in combination with systemic treatment or radiotherapy. However, transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib has not been investigated in this setting. This open-label, single-center, randomized trial showed that transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib is safe, well tolerated, and has favorable efficacy versus transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.

The multidisciplinary management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus

Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is one of the most common complications of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which refers to the advanced stage of HCC and indicates an extremely poor prognosis. Monotherapy cannot effectively prolong the survival benefit of patients with HCC-PVTT characterized by a high recurrence rate. With great progress in the area of immune and molecular targeted therapy, there comes a promising era of multidisciplinary management of HCC. Survival benefits can be achieved based on accurate diagnosis, staging, and multidisciplinary management. Additionally, in terms of the presence of controversy about the standard treatment algorithm and the absence of universal treatment guidelines, a multidisciplinary management program may afford the best hope for HCC-PVTT patients via appropriate implement of various treatment protocols.

Radiologic Response Combined with Dermatologic Toxicities is the Most Robust Predictor of Survival Benefits in Patients with Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Sorafenib Therapy

PURPOSE

The survival benefits of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and receive sorafenib therapy remain controversial. We aimed to identify clinical predictors in patients with inoperable HCC undergoing TACE and receiving sorafenib.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2017, 148 consecutive patients with inoperable HCC who were treated with TACE plus sorafenib were retrospectively analyzed. Critical clinical factors associated with overall survival (OS) were identified by Cox regression model analysis. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate the survival times, which were compared with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Macrovascular invasion (MVI), radiologic response and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicities were identified as independent factors associated with OS. MVI is a known prognostic factor before treatment. The median OS of patients with either radiologic response or dermatologic toxicities was significantly improved compared with that of patients without it (both 23.0 vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001). The median OS of patients with a combination of radiologic response and dermatologic toxicities was significantly longer than that of patients with either radiologic response or dermatologic toxicities, as well as no response (25.0 vs. 14.0 vs. 6.0 months, respectively, P < 0.001), and the predictive value was confirmed across patients with different baseline characteristics in terms of MVI, α-fetoprotein level, performance status and liver function.

CONCLUSION

The combination of radiologic response and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicities is the most robust predictor of survival benefits for HCC patients after TACE plus sorafenib therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

A prognostic score model for predicting the survival benefits of patients undergoing sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion

PURPOSE

The survival benefits and which patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) would benefit from sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy remain controversial. We aimed to develop a prognostic score model for predicting different prognoses of patients with HCC and portal vein invasion who received sorafenib plus TACE.

METHODS

This observational study included 167 patients with HCC and portal vein invasion undergoing sorafenib combined with TACE from January 2013 to June 2018 at two hospitals. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed using a training cohort (n = 83) to identify critical factors associated with survival. Then, a prognostic score model was established to classify different outcomes and confirmed using a validation cohort (n = 84).

RESULTS

Three factors were determined to critically impact survival in the training cohort: portal vein invasion extent, sorafenib-related dermatologic response, and initial radiological response. Using the β-coefficients of these factors, a prognostic score was calculated, and the survival time decreased as the score increased. Based on the prognostic score model, three different prognoses of patients with 0 points, 2-3 points, and > 3 points were stratified with a median survival of 38.0 months, 20.0 months, and 7.0 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Time to progression was also significantly different using the same prognostic index. The prognostic score model was confirmed by the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib plus TACE is a potential therapy for selected HCC patients with portal vein invasion. This prognostic score model can predict the survival benefits for these patients.

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization to sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

An increasing number of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib combination therapy has been applied for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it remains controversial whether combination therapy is superior to sorafenib monotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of TACE plus sorafenib for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was based on the relative outcomes from a specific search of online databases between January 2008 and November 2019, and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify potential predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 3868 patients (TACE plus sorafenib vs sorafenib, 1181 vs 2687) were identified from nine studies, including one randomized controlled trial and eight retrospective cohort studies. The pooled results revealed that TACE plus sorafenib combination therapy significantly improves overall survival with the combined hazard ratio 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.84, P < 0.001), time to progression (hazard ratio = 0.73, 95%CI = 0.65-0.82, P < 0.001), and objective response rate (odds ratio = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.31-3.66, P = 0.003). Subgroup analysis indicated that patients who developed macrovascular invasion achieve significantly great overall survival (P for interaction = 0.001) with combination therapy, in contrast to nonmacrovascular invasion patients. In addition, no significant differences in adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated that TACE plus sorafenib combination therapy is superior to sorafenib monotherapy and should be recommended as an optimal treatment choice for unresectable HCC.

Safety and Efficacy of Camrelizumab Combined with Apatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction

Previous trials demonstrated that anti-angiogenesis or anti-programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy showed unsatisfied effect in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No study existed that focus on the effects of camrelizumab and apatinib ("C+A") combination therapy for HCC patients with the location and extent of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) as the main variable being assessed. This study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of "C+A" for HCC patients with PVTT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed patients with advanced HCC and PVTT who underwent "C+A" therapy in a multicenter retrospective cohort from Jan 2019 to July 2020. Outcomes of patients who underwent "C+A" were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method according to types of PVTT: PVTT in the main portal vein (type A), PVTT in the first-order portal vein branch (type B), and PVTT in second- or lower-order portal vein branches (type C).

Results

Sixty-three patients were finally included and the mean duration of follow-up was 12.6 ± 4.5 months. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for the whole cohort were 44.0% and 75.0%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) were 14.8 months, 11.8 months and not yet reached (NR), respectively. Patients with type B (OS, 15.9 months; PFS, 14.0 months; TTP, NR) or type C (OS, 16.0 months; PFS, 14.9 months; NR) PVTT appear to have better survival benefits compared with type A (OS, 5.8 months; PFS, 5.0 months; TTP, 7.0 months). Along with AFP, the absence of main PVTT was an independent predictive factor for survival at uni- and multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Camrelizumab and apatinib yielded a promising outcome in patients with advanced HCC who developed a tumor thrombus in the first lower-order portal vein branches and was generally safe and had manageable side effects.

The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolisation and sorafenib is the preferred palliative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis

Background

To compare the efficacy of three types of palliative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) monotherapy, sorafenib alone and their combination.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were retrieved. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to investigate the binary variables, and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with its 95% CI was employed to evaluate the continuous variables. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata/SE, version 12.0.

Results

Thirty-one clinical studies, containing 5125 unique cases of patients with advanced HCC, were included. There were significant improvements in overall survival (OS) (pooled SMD = 2.54; 95% CI 1.74–3.34) and time to progression (TTP) (pooled SMD = 2.49; 95% CI 0.87–4.12) of the patients after receiving the combination therapy of TACE and sorafenib, compared to TACE monotherapy, and the OS in the combined treatment cohort was also longer than that in the sorafenib-alone cohort (pooled SMD = 2.92; 95% CI 1.72–4.13). The combination therapy group in comparison to the TACE group benefited a significantly increased overall response rate (ORR) (pooled OR = 2.61; 95% CI 1.43–4.77), 1-year (pooled OR = 2.96; 95% CI 1.71–5.14) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.18–2.28) survival rates and reduced disease progression rate (DPR) (pooled OR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.33–0.68); in parallel, the ORR in the group was also significantly higher than that in the sorafenib-alone group (pooled OR = 3.62; 95% CI 1.28–10.22), although without a difference in the DPR (pooled OR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.05–1.48). In addition, we discovered that the 1-year (pooled OR = 1.39; 95% CI 0.84–2.29) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.70; 95% CI 0.69–4.18) survival rates in the TACE monotherapy cohort were not significantly different to those in the sorafenib-alone cohort.

Conclusion

The combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in improving the prognostic outcomes of patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, we recommend it as the preferred treatment intervention for those patients.

Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Microwave Ablation vs. Combined With Cryoablation

Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with ablation has been widely used for treating unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the technique with which TACE should be combined for it to be more effective remains unknown. Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with microwave ablation (MWA) vs. TACE combined with cryoablation (CRA) in treating unresectable HCC. Materials and Methods: From January 2011 to December 2018, 108 patients diagnosed with unresectable HCC were divided into either the TACE-MWA group (n = 48) or TACE-CRA group (n = 60). Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were compared between the two groups. To reduce potential bias, a propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Complications were observed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and compared using the log-rank test. Results : The baseline characteristics of the two groups were balanced. The median OS was 20.9 months (95% CI 14.3-27.6 months) in the TACE-MWA group and 13.0 months (95% CI 8.8-17.1 months) in the TACE-CRA group (P = 0.096). The median TTP was 8.8 months (95% CI 4.3-13.4 months) in the TACE-MWA group and 9.3 months (95% CI 7.1-11.5 months) in the TACE-CRA group (P = 0.675). After PSM, 48 patients remained in each group. The median OS in the TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA groups was 20.9 months (95% CI 14.3-27.6 months), and 13.5 months (95% CI 8.4-18.6 months, P = 0.100), respectively. The median TTP in the TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA groups was 8.8 months (95% CI 4.3-13.4 months), and 8.6 months (95% CI 3.1-14.2 months, P = 0.909), respectively. The overall incidence rate of ablation-related complications was lower in the TACE-MWA group than in the TACE-CRA group (66.7 vs. 88.3%, P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) and the maximum diameter of intrahepatic tumor were significant prognostic factors for OS and TTP. Conclusion: The efficacy of TACE-MWA and TACE-CRA in the treatment of unresectable HCC was comparable. TACE-MWA was more promising because of a lower complication rate, especially with regard to thrombocytopenia. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to validate our findings.

The PPRD score stratifies patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus treated with sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization

OBJECTIVES

To identify clinical prognostic and predictive factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) undergoing sorafenib plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and establish a prognostic score for these patients.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and December 2017, 184 consecutive patients with HCC and PVTT were concurrently treated with sorafenib and TACE. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to explore the clinical factors independently correlated with overall survival (OS). A prognostic score was then developed to identify different prognoses in an initial cohort and validated in an external cohort (n = 72).

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, performance status, extension of PVTT, initial radiological response, and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicity were identified as predictors associated with OS. These factors were used to develop a prognostic score (PPRD score, range from 0 to 11). The median survival was found to decrease as the PPRD score increased, and patients were stratified into a favorable group (0 points), intermediate group (1-4 points), and dismal group (> 4 points). The median survival of patients in the three groups was 34.0 months, 20.0 months, and 7.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, the time to progression (TTP) (p < 0.001) was stratified along the same prognostic groups. The external validation cohort confirmed the prognostic scores.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed score system can accurately stratify the outcomes of patients with HCC and PVTT treated with sorafenib plus TACE to help identify which group of patients may benefit from treatment.

KEY POINTS

• The survival benefits of patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib plus TACE remains controversial. • The independent factors associated with survival were identified to develop a prognostic score, called the PPRD score (standing for performance status, PVTT grade, radiological response, and sorafenib-related dermatologic toxicity); the median survival decreases as the score increases. • The scoring system can accurately stratify the survival benefits of patients with HCC and PVTT treated with combination therapy and help to identify which group of patients may benefit from the treatment. Graphical abstract.

Apatinib treatment may improve survival outcomes of patients with hepatitis B virus-related sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMS

This study aimed to (a) assess the effectiveness and safety of apatinib as a subsequent treatment for patients with sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and (b) identify the clinical factors influencing their treatment outcomes.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of consecutive patients with newly diagnosed advanced HCC treated with first-line sorafenib from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who were confirmed to have primary resistance to sorafenib were enrolled in this study. The outcomes of patients treated with apatinib were compared with those of patients who received supportive care. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients with sorafenib-resistant advanced HCC (84 men and 8 women; mean age, 51.9 years) were included. All patients had an etiology of hepatitis B. The median OS in the overall cohort was 5.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.9, 6.0]. Of 92 patients, 58 (63.0%) were treated with apatinib, and 34 (37.0%) received supportive care. Apatinib treatment was associated with longer survival times than supportive care for patients with sorafenib-resistant advanced HCC (median OS: 7.0 versus 4.0 months, p < 0.001). The results of the multivariate analysis demonstrated that liver tumor load [hazard ratio (HR): 3.653, 95% CI: 2.047, 5.965, p < 0.001] and extrahepatic spread (HR: 0.303, 95% CI: 0.231, 0.778, p = 0.003) were independent predictors of OS after apatinib treatment.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that subsequent apatinib treatment may improve survival outcomes compared with supportive care for patients with sorafenib-resistant, advanced hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related HCC, especially for patients who have a lower liver tumor load and extrahepatic spread.

Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Apatinib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Apatinib is a powerful inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. This study was aimed to investigate whether apatinib could improve the efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Between June 2015 and September 2018, 357 patients with HCC at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C who received the treatment of TACE combining with apatinib (TACE–apatinib) or TACE-alone were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce the patient selection bias.

Results: Ninety pairs of patients were chosen after the PSM analysis. The disease control rates of tumor and a-fetoprotein response in the TACE–apatinib group were significantly higher than that of the TACE-alone group before and after the PSM analysis (P < 0.05). Before the PSM analysis, the median time of tumor progression (TTP) and the overall survival (OS) in the TACE–apatinib group were significantly greater than those of the TACE-alone group (TTP: 9.0 months vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001; OS: 14.0 months vs. 7.0 months, P < 0.001). After the PSM analysis, the median TTP and OS in the TACE–apatinib group was also significantly greater than that of the TACE-alone group (TTP: 7.0 months vs. 3.0 months, P < 0.001; OS: 13.0 months vs. 8.0 months, P < 0.001); the uni- and multivariate analysis revealed that TACE–apatinib was a protective factor for OS. Fourteen patients emerged with grade 3 apatinib-related adverse events.

Conclusion: The efficacy of TACE–apatinib for patients with advanced HCC was inspiring, and the side effects of apatinib were tolerable.

Lenvatinib for large hepatocellular carcinomas with portal trunk invasion: Two case reports

BACKGROUND

In a phase III trial of lenvatinib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), the drug proved non-inferior to sorafenib in terms of the overall survival, but offered better progression-free survival. However, the effects of lenvatinib in uHCC patients with a tumor thrombus in the main portal vein and/or a high tumor burden (tumor occupancy more than 50% of the total liver volume), remain unclear, because these were set as exclusion criteria in the aforementioned trial.

CASE SUMMARY

A 53-year-old man (case 1) and 66-year-old woman (case 2) with uHCC presented to us with a tumor thrombus in both the main portal vein and inferior vena cava, a high tumor burden accompanied by a tumor diameter greater than > 100 mm, and distant metastasis, with the residual liver function classified as grade 2A according to the modified Albumin–Bilirubin grading. We started both patients on lenvatinib. The therapeutic effect, as evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, was rated as partial response in both case 1 and case 2 (at 8 wk and 4 wk after the start of lenvatinib administration, respectively). The therapeutic effect was sustained for 6 mo in case 1 and 20 mo in case 2. Fever occurred as an adverse event in both case 1 and 2, and hyperthyroidism and thrombocytopenia in only case 2, neither of which, however, necessitated treatment discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Even in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with poor prognostic factors, if the liver function is well-preserved, lenvatinib is effective and safe.

The efficacy of surgery in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study

Background

It is still controversial whether hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with lymph node invasion should receive surgery treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of surgery (liver resection and local tumor destruction treatments) in HCC patients with regional lymph node metastasis.

Methods

The study utilized data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 (SEER-18) cancer registry. Patients for whom the treatment type was not clear or those with distant metastasis or without regional lymph nodule invasion were excluded. For survival analysis, patients with the survival months coded as 0 and 999 were excluded. All 1434 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 168 patients were treated surgically and the other 1266 received non-surgery therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) model was used to reduce selection bias.

Results

Before PSM, the median overall survival (mOS) and median cancer-specific survival (mCSS) of patients treated surgically were longer than that of receiving non-surgery treatment (mOS 20 months, 95% CI 15.3–24.7 vs. 7 months, 95% CI 6.4–7.6, P < 0.001; mCSS 21 months, 95% CI 115.5–26.5 vs. 6 months, 95% CI 5.3–6.7, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis found no significant differences in mOS and mCSS between liver resection and non-liver resection surgery cohorts (P = 0.886 and P = 0.813, respectively). Similar results were obtained in the PSM analysis. The mOS and mCSS in the surgery group were longer than those in the non-surgery group (mOS 20 months vs. 7 months, P < 0.001; mCSS 20 months vs. 6 months, P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis documented that surgery was an independent predictor for OS and CSS before and after PSM.

Conclusions

HCC patients with invasion of regional lymph nodules may get more survival benefit from surgery than other types of treatment.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy with and without sorafenib as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT.Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions.The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 ± 10.07 months and 15.33 ± 22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively.The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.

Role of locoregional therapies in the wake of systemic therapy

Multiple systemic agents have recently been approved in the first- and second-line setting for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), increasing the therapeutic options for patients and treating physicians. The randomised controlled trials that led to these approvals were predominantly conducted in a population comprised of patients with advanced HCC. However, these trials also included a subset of patients who had progressed after locoregional therapies (LRTs), mostly transarterial chemoembolisation. With a greater number of systemic agents available, the role of LRTs has become a topic of debate, specifically regarding when to transition to systemic therapy in unresectable HCC and the potential opportunities for combining locoregional and systemic therapies. Trials of immuno-oncology agents (notably T cell checkpoint inhibitors) are ongoing in the advanced disease setting and these agents also present opportunities for combination therapies, both with other systemic agents and with LRTs in earlier stage disease. This article will review strategies to guide patient selection for LRT as well as the development of locoregional-systemic combinations based on scientific rationale and the challenges of clinical trial design in this setting.

Alpha-fetoprotein assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma after transarterial chemoembolization

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether AFP classification criteria correlate with tumor response measured using the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and predicate survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Data from 143 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC and elevated AFP (> 20 ng/mL), who underwent TACE as initial treatment between January 2011 and December 2015 were collected, retrospectively. AFP response was classified as follows: complete response, normalization of AFP; partial response, > 50% decrease from baseline; stable disease, - 50 to + 30% change from baseline; or progressive disease, > 30% increase from baseline. Response rates according to AFP and EASL criteria were compared, and associations between the AFP response and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The k value for agreement between AFP criteria and EASL criteria was 0.52 (moderate), with response rates of 42.7% and 41.3%, respectively (P = 0.811). The OS of responders was significantly longer compared with non-responders for both AFP (21 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001) and EASL (23 vs. 6 months, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the AFP response (hazard ratio [HR], 0.430, 95% CI, 0.233-0.794; P = 0.007), EASL response (HR, 0.343; 95% CI, 0.176-0.666; P = 0.002), and macroscopic vascular invasion (HR, 2.104; 95% CI, 1.403-3.154; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The defined AFP classification criteria was moderate correlated with EASL criteria and predicted the outcome in patients with HCC who underwent TACE.

Transarterial chemoembolization versus best supportive care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus：a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment after transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) with best supportive care (BSC) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with PVTT.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 1,040 patients with HCC with PVTT who were treated either with TACE (n = 675) or BSC (n = 365). BSC did not include sorafenib. The two groups of patients were compared with or without propensity score matching. A subgroup analysis was subsequently performed by stratifying patients according to the stages of PVTT in the Cheng's PVTT classification.

RESULTS

In PVTTtypes I-III, TACE was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS) thanBSC (P < 0.05). Within each type of PVTT for patients who received TACE or BSC, OS was significantly worse in patients with type IVPVTT than in any of the other three types of PVTT (all P < 0.05). TACE was associated with better long-termOS than BSC after propensity score matching or on stratification by the PVTT types.

CONCLUSION

TACE was associated with better OS than BSC in HCC patients with PVTT types I-III but not type IV. Patients with type IV PVTT showed the worst prognosis, regardless of whether TACE or BSC was used.

Apatinib Combined With Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Studies focusing on the effects of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) + the tyrosine kinase inhibitor apatinib in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with the location and extent of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) assessed as the main variable, are rare. This multicenter, retrospective, controlled study was performed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of TACE + apatinib and TACE alone in patients with HCC and PVTT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with nonresectable HCC and PVTT who underwent treatment with TACE + apatinib or TACE alone between January 2015 and January 2016. Outcomes in patients who underwent TACE + apatinib were compared with the outcomes of patients who underwent TACE alone, by using the Kaplan-Meier method, according to PVTT type: PVTT in the main portal vein (type A), PVTT in the first-order portal vein branch (type B), and PVTT in second- or lower-order portal vein branches (type C).

FINDINGS

One hundred eighty-eight patients were included in the analysis; 85 underwent treatment with TACE + apatinib and 103 underwent treatment with TACE. TACE + apatinib was associated with a significantly greater median survival compared with TACE alone in patients with PVTT type B (12.2 vs 7.5 months; P < 0.001) or type C (13.7 vs 7.2 months; P = 0.006). Along with treatment strategies and α-fetoprotein, the absence of main PVTT was an independent factor predictive of survival on uni- and multivariate analysis. Apatinib-related grade 3 adverse events occurred in 27 patients (31.8%).

IMPLICATIONS

TACE + apatinib can be of potential benefit to patients with advanced HCC with tumor thrombus in the first- and lower-order portal vein branches. Adverse events with apatinib need to be monitored during application, despite the manageable appearance.

Combined Transarterial Embolization/Chemoembolization-Based Locoregional Treatment with Sorafenib Prolongs the Survival in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Preserved Liver Function: A Propensity Score Matching Study

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the treatment outcome is not satisfactory. We retrospectively analyzed whether adding transarterial embolization/chemoembolization (TA(C)E)-based locoregional therapy to sorafenib can further improve treatment efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 147 BCLC stage C HCC patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A liver function and treated with sorafenib for analysis. Through propensity score matching, we divided patients into the combined treatment group (n = 63; patients received TA(C)E-based locoregional treatment and sorafenib) and the sorafenib monotherapy group (n = 63). We analyzed the effects of patients' clinical and tumor-related factors on their overall survival (OS) and time to tumor progression.

RESULTS

The OS was better in the combined treatment group than in the sorafenib monotherapy group (419 vs. 223 days, p = 0.028). In the Cox regression model, combined treatment, a lower baseline α-fetoprotein (AFP) level < 400 ng/mL, tumors without main portal venous tumorous thrombosis, and age ≥60 years were identified as independent factors for OS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with a higher baseline AFP level > 400 ng/mL, age < 60 years, tumors with branched portal venous tumorous thrombosis only or without extrahepatic metastasis benefited the most from combined treatment.

CONCLUSION

Combining TA(C)E-based locoregional treatment with sorafenib resulted in better OS in patients with BCLC stage C HCC compared with sorafenib alone. TA(C)E-based locoregional treatment can be an adjunctive treatment to sorafenib for patients with advanced HCC and a satisfactory liver functional reserve.

Treatment strategies for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver cancer ranks fifth in incidence and fourth in overall cancer-related mortality, with approximately 854,000 new cases and 810,000 deaths per year worldwide. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 90% of these cases, and, over time, both the incidence and mortality of this cancer have been rising in many regions. Several staging systems are used to assess the extent of primary tumor, presence of metastasis, and underlying liver disease, and thereby aid in the definition of treatment strategies and prognosis for these patients. The consequence of this heterogeneity in HCC staging is that no consensual definition of advanced disease exists, and there is still ongoing debate on the optimal treatment for these patients. Patients with advanced tumors can be candidates for multiple therapies, ranging from potentially curative options such as transplantation and resection-to locoregional and systemic treatments; these should be evaluated on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary team. This paper provides an overview of treatment options for advanced stage HCC, based on a review of the latest relevant literature and the personal experience of the authors.

Apatinib for Patients With Sorafenib-Refractory Advanced Hepatitis B Virus Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Pilot Study

More than half of the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) do not respond to primary treatment with sorafenib. Currently, there are no universally accepted methods for further treatment. This pilot study was performed to assess the safety and effectiveness of apatinib as an optional treatment for patients with sorafenib-refractory HCC. Between January 2015 and May 2017, 43 consecutive patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HCC who received apatinib were reviewed. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were assessed using modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. The time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities associated with apatinib were assessed. All patients had hepatitis B virus (HBV) related HCC. The mean follow-up time was 11 months (range: 3-37) and the mean duration of apatinib was 7.6 months (range: 1-32). After treatment, 11 patients had partial response (PR), 18 had stable disease (SD), and 14 had progressive disease (PD); accordingly, the ORR and DCR were 25.6% and 67.4%, respectively. The median TTP and OS were 3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-4.1) and 8 months (95% CI: 6.9-9.0), respectively. The median OS times for PR, SD, and PD were 19 months (95% CI: 15.8-22.2), 8 months (95% CI: 7.3-8.7), and 4 months (95% CI: 3.1-4.9), respectively (P < .001). The median TTP for PR, SD, and PD was 14 months (95% CI: 11.9-16.1), 3 months (95% CI: 2.3-3.7) and 1 month, respectively (P < .001). No patients experienced toxicity-related death. The most common toxicities were weight loss, hand-foot skin reaction, and hypertension. Twelve adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed. Based on our findings, apatinib is a promising treatment for patients with sorafenib-refractory advanced HBV-related HCC.

Which is the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Sorafenib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis and identify the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib. We searched databases for publications prior to May 2018. The prespecified efficacy outcomes were the objective response rate, overall survival rate, and time to progression. adverse effects included dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and general disorders. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and a network meta-analysis regarding two types of outcomes by different chemotherapy agents in TACE (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Platinum, mitomycin C, hydroxycamptothecin) were included. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018098541). For efficacy outcomes, subgroups which included 5-fluorouracil and hydroxycamptothecin ranked higher than other chemotherapy agents, while mitomycin C ranked the lowest. For advanced effects, the use of mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil as the chemotherapy agent ranked higher, while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded 5-Fu and Mitomycin C in subsequent studies. Additionally, in the evaluation of primary adverse effects by the network meta-analysis, Platinum ranked the highest while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded Platinum this time. Furthermore, all types of Adriamycin are not same, and some studies included two types of Adriamycin. The network meta-analysis results showed that the TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + pirarubicin) +Sorafenib arm and TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + epirubicin) +Sorafenib arm had significant efficacy differences. In conclusion, for patients with advanced HCC, combination therapy with HCPT plus THP/EPI in TACE and Sorfenib may be used as a first-line treatment.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with sorafenib versus TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The benefits of transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib (TACE-S) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remain controversial. We compared the effectiveness and safety of TACE-S and TACE for HCC with PVTT.

Methods

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, Wan Fang, and Sino Med databases were systematically searched for studies of HCC with PVTT treated using TACE-S. Two authors independently extracted study outcomes, including overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), objective response (tumor response) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Eight high-quality, retrospective studies with 1091 patients (TACE-S=356, TACE=735) were included in the review. Five retrospective studies with 973 patients (TACE-S=238, TACE=735) were included in the meta-analysis. The objective response rate (ORR, OR=3.59, 95% CI=1.74–7.39; I²=21%, P=0.0005) and disease control rate (DCR, OR=4.72, 95% CI=1.75–12.72; I²=56%, P=0.002) favored TACE-S. TACE-S significantly increased 6-month OS (OR=3.47; 95% CI=2.47–4.89; I²=0%, P < 0.00001) and 1-year OS (OR=3.10; 95% CI=2.22–4.33; I²=41%, P < 0.00001). The hazard ratio (HR) for OS (HR=0.62; 95% CI=0.51–0.75; I²=30%, P < 0.00001) also indicated that TACE-S was superior to TACE. TACE-S with PVTT had better outcomes in the first-order portal vein branch and lower-order portal vein branches than in the main portal vein and upper branches to superior mesenteric vein. The most common AEs were hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR, 178; 73%), diarrhea (142; 58%) and alopecia (76; 31%); AEs of grade 3/4 were rare.

Conclusions

TACE-S may improve OS, ORR, TTP and DCR for HCC patients with PVTT compared to TACE.

Outcomes of metastatic spinal cord compression secondary to primary hepatocellular carcinoma with multidisciplinary treatments

Few studies have reported progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following surgery and adjuvant therapies. Enrolled in this study were 155 MSCC patients with primary HCC who received surgery and adjuvant therapies between 2000 and 2015. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox’s proportional hazards regression mode were performed to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS. The median PFS and OS was 7.0 months and 9.7 months, respectively. 92.9% patients responded well to surgery according to the Visual Analogue Scale, Frankel Score and postoperative complication occurrences. 68 (43.9%) patients who received circumferential decompression achieved better PFS than the remaining 87 (56.1%) patients who received laminectomy. Favorable outcomes were achieved after surgery during the perioperative period. Circumferential decompression was associated with better PFS than laminectomy. The postoperative Frankel Score E, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 1 or 2, no visceral metastasis, administration of postoperative radiation and the use of Sorafenib were found to be significant predictors of better PFS and OS. Patients who previously underwent resection of primary HCC with/without liver transplantation tended to have a better OS.

Transarterial Chemoembolization within First 3 Months of Sorafenib Initiation Improves Overall Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective, Multi-Institutional Study with Propensity Matching

PURPOSE

The impact of transarterial chemoembolization after initiation of sorafenib (SOR) has not been prospectively compared with SOR alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The objective of this study was to assess whether SOR + transarterial chemoembolization provides benefit over SOR alone in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study with propensity matching using data from patients prescribed SOR for HCC at Veterans Health Administration hospitals from 2007 to 2015. The primary outcome was overall survival from the time of SOR prescription and stratified by receipt of transarterial chemoembolization within 90 days of SOR initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 4,896 patients received SOR for HCC, of whom 232 (4.7%) underwent transarterial chemoembolization within 90 days. Patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization + SOR were highly selected, being younger and with less significant hepatic dysfunction, earlier Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (P < .0001), and fewer tumors with lower rates of macrovascular invasion (MVI) and metastases (all P < .0001) than SOR-alone patients. In unadjusted analysis, SOR + transarterial chemoembolization was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.71; P < .0001). After propensity matching, SOR + transarterial chemoembolization continued to show significant associations with reduced mortality with HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.92; P = .0005). Subgroup analysis suggests that the addition of transarterial chemoembolization to SOR improves outcomes in most patients, particularly those with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score <15, platelets >50,000/μL, and >3 tumors with or without macrovascular invasion, without local invasion or metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unresectable HCC started on systemic therapy with SOR appear to benefit from adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization. Optimal application of multimodal therapy in this setting should be prospectively investigated.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combined with Concurrent Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib is recommended for the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with HCC and major portal vein tumor thrombosis treated with sorafenib monotherapy is no more than 3 months. A prospective single-arm phase II study was conducted to determine whether adding hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin to sorafenib could improve on these results.

METHODS

Thirty five patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² HAI on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m² HAI on days 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2800 mg/m² on days 1 and 2, repeated every 21 days. The primary end point was the 3-month PFS rate.

RESULTS

The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 82.9, 51.4, and 22.9%, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival was 6.7 and 13.2 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 40%, and the disease control rate was 77.1% by RECIST criteria. Five (14.3%) patients achieved conversion to complete resection after the study treatment, and one of them experienced a pathological complete response. Treatment-related deaths did not occur. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of increases in aspartate aminotransferase (31.4%), hand-foot syndrome (17.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.3%), and neutropenia (8.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination treatment met the pre-specified end point of a 3-month progression free survival rate exceeding 65% and was clinical tolerable. The merits of this approach need to be established with a phase III trial. Clinical trial number http://ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02981498).

Therapies for advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion or metastatic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complex disease most commonly arising in the background of chronic liver disease. In the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in our understanding of both the clinical and molecular heterogeneity of HCC. There has been a robust increase in clinical trial activity in patients with poor prognostic factors, such as macrovascular invasion and extrahepatic spread (EHS). We aimed to synthesize the evidence for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC based on these baseline characteristics, including patients with both Child-Pugh (CP) scores of A and B. A comprehensive search of several databases from each database inception to February 15, 2016 any language was conducted. We included 14 studies (three randomized controlled studies [RCTs] and 11 observational studies). We included studies that compared sorafenib, transarterial bland embolization/transarterial chemoembolization, yttrium-90/radiation therapy, ablation (or combination), and no therapy. Two RCTs comparing sorafenib to best supportive care demonstrated a consistent improvement in overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced HCC and metastatic vascular invasion (MVI) and/or EHS and CP A liver disease (hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.87]; I²  = 0%). Several observational studies evaluated locoregional therapies alone or in combination with other treatments and were limited by very-low-quality of evidence. This was true for both patients with EHS and MVI.

CONCLUSION

In patients with advanced HCC and CP A liver function, sorafenib is the only treatment that has been shown to improve OS in randomized studies. High-quality data supporting the use of other treatment modalities in this setting, or in the setting of patients with less compensated (CP B) liver disease, are lacking. (Hepatology 2018;67:422-435).

Combined endovascular brachytherapy, sorafenib, and transarterial chemobolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus

AIM

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of combined endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and sorafenib to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus (MPVTT).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study involved 68 patients with unresectable HCC or those who were unfit for liver transplantation and percutaneous frequency ablation according to the BCLC classification. All patients had Child-Pugh classification grade A or B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and MPVTT. The patients received either EVBT with stent placement, TACE, and sorafenib (group A, n = 37), or TACE with sorafenib (group B, n = 31). The time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by propensity score analysis.

RESULTS

In the entire cohort, the 6-, 12-, and 24-mo survival rates were 88.9%, 54.3%, and 14.1% in group A, and 45.8%, 0%, and 0% in group B, respectively (P < 0.001). The median TTP and OS were significantly longer in group A than group B (TTP: 9.0 mo vs 3.4 mo, P < 0.001; OS: 12.3 mo vs 5.2 mo, P < 0.001). In the propensity score-matched cohort, the median OS was longer in group A than in group B (10.3 mo vs 6.0 mo, P < 0.001). Similarly, the median TTP was longer in group A than in group B (9.0 mo vs 3.4 mo, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that the EVBT combined with stent placement, TACE, and sorafenib strategy was an independent predictor of favorable OS (HR = 0.18, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EVBT combined with stent placement, TACE, and sorafenib might be a safe and effective palliative treatment option for MPVTT.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion: Defining the Optimal Treatment Strategy

BACKGROUND

Tumoral macrovascular invasion (MVI) of hepatic and/or portal vein branches is a common phenomenon in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and is associated with poorer prognosis when compared to HCC without MVI.

SUMMARY

Current international guidelines for the management of HCC recommend sorafenib as the only treatment option in case of MVI. Despite guideline recommendations, several alternative options have been tested to manage HCC with MVI: surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, external or internal radiation, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, percutaneous treatment, cryotherapy, or the combination of two or more of these strategies, with or without sorafenib. Here we will provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art review for the management of this challenging clinical entity based on the most recent available data.

KEY MESSAGES

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that alternative strategies to standard-of-care sorafenib might improve survival in patients with advanced HCC with MVI but the level of evidence remains weak. Randomized phase III trials are ongoing and will hopefully provide information leading towards a more personalized treatment algorithm.

The safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization combined with sorafenib and sorafenib mono-therapy in patients with BCLC stage B/C hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are recommended therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but their combined efficacy remains unclear.

METHODS

Between August 2004 and November 2014, 104 patients with BCLC stage B/C HCC were enrolled at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, China. Forty-eight patients were treated with sorafenib alone (sorafenib group) and 56 with TACE plus sorafenib (TACE + sorafenib group). Baseline demographic/clinical data were collected. The primary outcomes were median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall response rate (ORR) and sorafenib-related adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics associated with disease prognosis were identified using multivariate Cox hazards regression.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 104 patients (94 males; 90.38%) was 49.02 ± 12.29 years. Of the baseline data, only albumin level (P = 0.028) and Child-Pugh class (P = 0.017) differed significantly between groups. Median OS did not differ significantly between the sorafenib and TACE + sorafenib groups (18.0 vs. 22.0 months, P = 0.223). Median PFS was significantly shorter in the sorafenib group than that in the TACE + sorafenib group (6.0 vs. 8.0 months, P = 0.004). Six months after treatments, the ORRs were similar between the sorafenib and TACE + sorafenib groups (12.50% vs. 18.75%, P = 0.425). The rates of grade III-IV adverse events in sorafenib and TACE + sorafenib groups were 29.2% vs. 23.2%, respectively. TACE plus sorafenib treatment (HR = 0.498, 95% CI = 0.278-0.892), no vascular invasion (HR = 0.354, 95% CI = 0.183-0.685) and Child-Pugh class A (HR = 0.308, 95% CI = 0.141-0.674) were significantly associated with better OS, while a larger tumor number was predictive of poorer OS (HR = 1.286, 95% CI = 1.031-1.604). TACE plus sorafenib treatment (HR = 0.461, 95% CI = 0.273-0.780) and no vascular invasion (HR = 0.557, 95% CI = 0.314-0.988) were significantly associated with better PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with sorafenib alone, combining TACE with sorafenib might prolong survival and delay disease progression in patients with advanced HCC.