Evaluation of Miracle Mouthwash plus Hydrocortisone Versus Prednisolone Mouth Rinses as Prophylaxis for Everolimus-Associated Stomatitis: A Randomized Phase II Study

The role of everolimus in metastatic breast cancer and possibilities of moving forward-a narrative review

Background and Objective

In hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer endocrine-based therapies are preferred over chemotherapy. One of the treatment options is the combination of everolimus with exemestane or other endocrine drug in later lines mainly based on progression-free survival (PFS) results of the phase 3 BOLERO-2 trial. Altogether, clinical trials did not prove an overall survival (OS) benefit and considerable side effects hampered its application in the day-by-day practice. In recent years CDK4/6-inhibitors became a first-choice combination partner to the endocrine treatment, everolimus still has a place within the treatment armamentarium. Although everolimus is a targeted drug, there is no accepted predictive biomarker and further patient selection is not possible. However, several directions can be defined how to optimally use everolimus. For update information on everolimus treatment in breast cancer I have performed a literature search.

Methods

I used the keywords "breast cancer" and "everolimus" and extended the search in PubMed from 01/01/2014 to 10/02/2023. I considered all phase 3 trials, the phase 1-2 trials with not repetitive information, studies with biomarker results and I also checked review articles to identify potential relevant other clinical trial reports. I also have made a search in clinicaltrials.gov for recently completed and ongoing trials.

Key Content and Findings

I summarized the search results in this concise and brief report focusing on main trial results and ongoing research with everolimus.

Conclusions

The most promising research directions seem to be further investigations for useable predictive biomarkers, for combinations with other targeted drugs (even in a triple combination) and for the feasibility of pharmacologically guided dosing method.

Reporting on patient's body mass index (BMI) in recent clinical trials for patients with breast cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The proportion of patients with breast cancer and obesity is increasing. While the therapeutic landscape of breast cancer has been expanding, we lack knowledge about the potential differential efficacy of most drugs according to the body mass index (BMI). Here, we conducted a systematic review on recent clinical drug trials to document the dosing regimen of recent drugs, the reporting of BMI and the possible exclusion of patients according to BMI, other adiposity measurements and/or diabetes (leading comorbidity of obesity). We further explored whether treatment efficacy was evaluated according to BMI.

METHODS

A search of Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed to identify phase I-IV trials investigating novel systemic breast cancer treatments. Dosing regimens and exclusion based on BMI, adiposity measurements or diabetes, documentation of BMI and subgroup analyses according to BMI were assessed.

RESULTS

495 trials evaluating 26 different drugs were included. Most of the drugs (21/26, 81%) were given in a fixed dose independent of patient weight. BMI was an exclusion criterion in 3 out of 495 trials. Patients with diabetes, the leading comorbidity of obesity, were excluded in 67/495 trials (13.5%). Distribution of patients according to BMI was mentioned in 8% of the manuscripts, subgroup analysis was performed in 2 trials. No other measures of adiposity/body composition were mentioned in any of the trials. Retrospective analyses on the impact of BMI were performed in 6 trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient adiposity is hardly considered as most novel drug treatments are given in a fixed dose. BMI is generally not reported in recent trials and few secondary analyses are performed. Given the prevalence of patients with obesity and the impact obesity can have on pharmacokinetics and cancer biology, more attention should be given by investigators and study sponsors to reporting patient's BMI and evaluating its impact on treatment efficacy and toxicity.

Emerging pharmacotherapy trends in preventing and managing oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy and targeted agents

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has tremendously changed the clinical outcomes and prognosis of cancer patients. Despite innovative pharmacological therapies and improved radiotherapy (RT) techniques, patients continue to suffer from side effects, of which oral mucositis (OM) is still the most impactful, especially for quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an overview of current advances in cancer pharmacotherapy and RT, in relation to their potential to cause OM, and of the less explored and more recent literature reports related to the best management of OM. We have analyzed natural/antioxidant agents, probiotics, mucosal protectants and healing coadjuvants, pharmacotherapies, immunomodulatory and anticancer agents, photobiomodulation and the impact of technology.

EXPERT OPINION

The discovery of more precise pathophysiologic mechanisms of CT and RT-induced OM has outlined that OM has a multifactorial origin, including direct effects, oxidative damage, upregulation of immunologic factors, and effects on oral flora. A persistent upregulated immune response, associated with factors related to patients' characteristics, may contribute to more severe and long-lasting OM. The goal is strategies to conjugate individual patient, disease, and therapy-related factors to guide OM prevention or treatment. Despite further high-quality research is warranted, the issue of prevention is paramount in future strategies.

Biobehavioral Influences of Stress and Inflammation on Mucositis in Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Results from a Pilot Study

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced mucositis is a prevalent and burdensome toxicity among adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with cancer and impedes the delivery of optimal therapy. Its development is not well understood, but baseline stress and inflammation may be contributory factors. This pilot study evaluates stress and inflammation as risk factors for mucositis, identifies effect size estimates, and evaluates the feasibility of a prospective study to investigate mucositis development. Methods: Thirty AYAs receiving chemotherapy with substantial risk of mucositis completed baseline stress measures, and serum was collected for inflammatory biomarker analysis. Regression and mediation analyses determined the relationship between stress/inflammation and mucositis. Results: Stress appears to be a significant risk factor for incidence of mucositis (odds ratio 1.13, p = 0.125) and predicts total mucositis score (β = 0.281, p = 0.023) as well as peak incidence (β = 0.052, p = 0.018). Baseline levels of interleukin (IL)-1a and epidermal growth factor (EGF) predicted mucositis development, and EGF and IL-8 may mediate the relationship between stress and mucositis. Findings suggest that stress-induced inflammation exacerbates symptom development. Conclusion: Results from this pilot study inform mucositis symptom models, suggesting that psychosocial and physiologic factors are involved in development. Importantly, this pilot study provides initial effect size estimates, including magnitude and direction of relationships, that are essential to informing larger, more robustly powered studies. High enrollment, low attrition, and minimal missing data in this study suggest this model is feasible for research in this population. Importantly, this work is a first step in identifying new risk factors for mucositis and targets for nurse-led interventions to prevent toxicity development.

Dexamethasone to prevent everolimus-induced stomatitis (Alliance MIST Trial: A221701)

mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus may cause oral stomatitis, often a dose-limiting toxicity. Prior clinical research has suggested that a dexamethasone mouth rinse might help prevent and/or treat this. Alliance A221701 was a randomized phase III trial of patients initiating 10 mg daily oral everolimus that compared dexamethasone mouthwash taken preventively (initial dexamethasone group) versus therapeutically (initial placebo group) to assess two coprimary endpoints: the incidence of mTOR inhibitor-associated stomatitis (mIAS), and the area under the curve (AUC) of mIAS-associated pain over an 8-week treatment period. A Fisher's exact test was used to compare the incidences while a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the AUCs. In addition, we performed an exploratory analysis of the association of everolimus trough concentrations and toxicity using a Mann-Whitney U test. Due to slow accrual, this study closed after 39 patients were randomized (19 to upfront placebo and 20 to upfront dexamethasone). There were no significant differences between groups seen in either of the coprimary endpoints; furthermore, we found no association between whole blood everolimus trough concentrations and toxicity. Although limited by poor enrollment, the results of this study do not suggest that prophylactic dexamethasone mouthwash is superior to therapeutic dexamethasone mouthwash (initiated at the first sign of mouth pain) for reducing the incidence or severity of mIAS from everolimus.

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase II study to evaluate the tolerability of an induction dose escalation of everolimus in patients with metastatic breast cancer (DESIREE)

BACKGROUND

Stomatitis is one of the main reasons to discontinue everolimus in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). To decrease stomatitis and subsequently early treatment discontinuations or dose reductions, the DESIREE trial investigated the use of a stepwise dose-escalation schedule of everolimus (EVE esc).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

DESIREE is a phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and progression/relapse after nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor treatment. Patients were randomised to EVE esc (2.5 mg/day, week 1; 5 mg/day, week 2; 7.5 mg/day, week 3; 10 mg/day, weeks 4-24) or everolimus 10 mg/day (EVE 10mg) for 24 weeks plus exemestane. The primary endpoint was the incidence of stomatitis episodes grade ≥2 within 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints included toxicity, relative total dose intensity (RTDI) and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients were randomised and 156 started treatment (EVE esc: 80; EVE 10mg: 76). The median age of patients was 64 years (range 33-85), 56.3% patients in the EVE esc arm versus 42.1% in the EVE 10mg arm had liver metastasis (P = 0.081) and 62.5% versus 51.3% received over one metastatic therapy line (P = 0.196). Within 12 weeks, the incidence of stomatitis episodes grade ≥2 was significantly lower in the EVE esc arm compared with the EVE 10mg arm (28.8% versus 46.1%; odds ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.92; P = 0.026). Toxicity was in line with the known safety profile without new safety concerns. The median RTDI was 91.1% in the EVE esc arm versus 80.0% in the EVE 10mg arm (P = 0.329). Discontinuation rate in the first 3 weeks was 6.3% versus 15.8%, respectively (P = 0.073). QoL was comparable between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

A dose-escalation schema of everolimus over 3 weeks can be successfully used to reduce the incidence of high-grade stomatitis in the first 12 weeks of treatment in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02387099; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02387099.

A Multi-Centric Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus in Adult Chinese Patients With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Associated Renal Angiomyolipomas

Background

Everolimus has been approved in China for adult patients with TSC-AML (tuberous sclerosis associated renal angiomyolipomas) not requiring immediate surgery and has been previously shown to be an effective treatment option for TSC-AML in the Chinese population

Methods

This is an open label, single arm, multi-center Phase IV post-approval commitment study to further assess the safety and efficacy of everolimus in patients with TSC-AML who do not require immediate surgical intervention. The primary outcome was to evaluate the safety of everolimus while the secondary outcome was to evaluate AML response.

Results

Treatment with everolimus was associated with a clinically meaningful best overall AML response rate of 70% (95% CI: 53.5, 83.4). Of the 38 evaluable patients, 37 (97%) patients experienced a reduction in the sum of volumes of target angiomyolipoma lesions relative to baseline. At Week 12 (n=38), the median percentage change in sum of target AML volume was −56.60%, which further changed by -59.96% at Week 24 (n=38), and by −64.41% at Week 48 (n=22). Throughout the study, renal function remained relatively stable. Patients with TSC associated lymphangiomyomatosis (LAM) (N=13) demonstrated a lower than expected rate of decline in pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Everolimus was generally well tolerated with no significant safety findings in Chinese patients. Most of the adverse events were of grade 1-2, and manageable with appropriate dose adjustments and supportive therapies. There were no treatment discontinuation due to AE and no treatment death was reported.

Conclusions

Based on the efficacy and safety data presented in this study, the overall clinical benefit/risk assessment further supports the use of everolimus as a viable treatment option for Chinese patients with TSC-AML.

Anti-inflammatory mouthwashes for the prevention of oral mucositis in cancer therapy: an integrative review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Mucositis is severely painful and often reported as one of the most distressing adverse effects of cancer therapy; it is a significant threat to quality of life as well as life itself. Anti-inflammatory agents may modulate physiologic mechanisms that perpetuate mucositis and be useful in prevention efforts. Because systemic anti-inflammatory agents are not appropriate for many patients, locally acting agents (mouthwashes) may be more feasible for use. This review and meta-analysis evaluates the role that anti-inflammatory mouthwashes have in preventing or reducing oral mucositis associated with chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-inflammatory mouthwashes to prevent therapy-associated mucositis. Meta-analysis was conducted to determine efficacy in preventing any mucositis and dose-limiting mucositis.

RESULTS

Eight peer-reviewed publications were identified; corticosteroid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory mouthwashes are effective in reducing overall incidence of mucositis and are associated with lower severity of mucositis. Meta-analysis reveals significant reduction in symptomatic mucositis incidence (OR 6.00, 95% CI 4.39-8.20, p < 0.0001) and reduction of dose-limiting mucositis (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.07-4.28, p = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Mouthwashes containing anti-inflammatory agents are a potential effective means to prevent or reduce mucositis associated with cancer therapy. There are limited adverse effects from these agents, and adherence is high, indicating safety and feasibility of use. Anti-inflammatory mouthwashes should be considered for supportive care in persons at risk for mucositis and must be further evaluated to investigate efficacy across multiple chemotherapy agents, adverse effects, and impacts on symptoms, pain, and quality of life.

Treatment Update in Systemic Lupus Erythematous

The recent updates on treatment recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematous have provided greater clarity in the way existing anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs are used, in treating disease activity, preventing flares, and reducing irreversible organ damage and toxicity arising from the treatments themselves. Novel therapies will provide more options in the armamentarium for treating this complex disease, but ongoing studies are needed to improve understanding of the optimal treatment algorithm to maintain quality of life and improve survival for patients.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose everolimus treatment for renal angiomyolipoma associated with tuberous sclerosis complex

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose everolimus treatment in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated angiomyolipoma (AML) with renal dysfunction or low body weight.

METHODS

We investigated a total of 50 adult patients underwent everolimus treatment for AML associated with TSC. For patients with renal dysfunction (serum creatinine level ≥ 1.5 mg/dl) or low body weight (body weight < 35 kg), 5 mg of everolimus was administered daily (low-dose group). For patients without renal dysfunction or low body weight, 10 mg of everolimus was administered daily (conventional-dose group). The treatment effects and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 20 patients in the low-dose group, and 30 in the conventional-dose group. The average reduction rate of the AML volume in the low-dose group was 52%, whereas it was 60% in the conventional-dose group. No significant differences were found in the average reduction rate between the groups (P = 0.24). The average blood everolimus trough levels were 7.7 ± 3.1 ng/mL in the low-dose group and 12.2 ± 5.7 ng/mL in the conventional-dose group. The level was significantly higher in the conventional-dose group than in the low-dose group (P = 0.004). The incidences of stomatitis and irregular menstruation were significantly lower in the low-dose group than in the conventional-dose group (P = 0.009, P = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that low-dose everolimus treatment is safe and effective for TSC-associated AML. This treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were mild in all cases.

Everolimus plus exemestane in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: incidence and time course of adverse events in the phase IIIb BALLET population

BACKGROUND

The addition of everolimus to exemestane therapy significantly improves progression-free survival in postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative endocrine-resistant breast cancer. However, the safety profile of this schedule still might be optimized.

METHODS

Patients included in the BALLET trial were assessed. The objectives of this analysis were to provide additional information on the safety profile of this schedule depending on prior anticancer therapies and to characterize the time course of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) of clinical interest throughout the study period. Non-infectious pneumonitis (NIP), stomatitis, asthenia and weight loss were selected as AEs of clinical interest.

RESULTS

The safety population of this analysis comprised 2131 patients. There were similar incidences of AEs and SAEs of clinical interest regardless of previous anticancer therapies. Most stomatitis and asthenia events occurred within the first three months. Incidence of weight loss appeared to plateau except in the case of grade 3-4 events, which occurred rarely. The incidence of any grade NIP (between 2 to 6%) and grade 3-4 NIP (between 0 to 1%) was low across the study, but steady.

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus plus exemestane is a well-known therapeutic option for aromatase inhibitor pretreated advanced breast cancer patients, and its toxicity profile is similar to that described in previous studies. Close monitoring, especially within the first three months, early intervention with preventive measures and patient education to help recognize the first signs and symptoms of AEs, will help to reduce their incidence and severity.

A single-arm, phase 2 study of steroid-containing mouthwash for the prevention of everolimus-associated stomatitis in multiple tumor types

BACKGROUND

Everolimus is a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor used in the treatment of multiple tumor types, and its most common toxicity, stomatitis, can affect patient quality of life. Recent studies in breast cancer have supported the efficacy of steroid mouthwash for the prevention of everolimus-associated stomatitis. However, a few studies have been reported to date, and none have examined this effect in other tumor types.

METHODS

This single-arm phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of steroid-containing mouthwash for the prevention of stomatitis in patients with multiple tumor types receiving everolimus. The primary outcome was incidence of grade ≥ 2 stomatitis at 8 weeks of everolimus with steroid-containing mouthwash prophylaxis. We also assessed the stability of steroid-containing mouthwash components.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were evaluated, of which 76% had breast cancer and 24% had neuroendocrine tumors originating in the lung, gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, or of unknown primary origin. Grade ≥ 2 stomatitis incidence at 8 weeks was 28.1% (90% CI 16.2-46.1); the higher confidence limit exceeded the prespecified threshold of 30%. No patients developed grade ≥ 3 stomatitis. Most stomatitis occurred behind the oral cavity, with no lesions observed on the lips or floor of the mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings did not support a prophylactic effect of steroid-containing mouthwash on everolimus-associated stomatitis. Given the needs of prevention of everolimus-associated stomatitis in various tumor types, further studies in a larger population using a randomized controlled trial design are, therefore, required to confirm the efficacy of steroid-containing mouthwash.