1
|
Taxonomic Justification of the Pathogenic Strongylid Infecting the Arabian Camel Camelus Dromedarius as Haemonchus Longistipes by Morphological and Molecular Phylogeny. J Vet Res 2019; 63:51-61. [PMID: 30989135 PMCID: PMC6458561 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2019-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 03/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction There is still lack of morphological and phylogenetic information on the pathogenic nematode of the camel Haemonchus longistipes. In the present study, this parasite was isolated in Saudi Arabia and described. Material and Methods The abomasa of two Arabian camels were collected from a slaughterhouse in Abha province and examined for nematode infection. Worms were described morphologically and morphometrically by electron microscopy. Multiple sequence alignment and the phylogenetic tree of the parasite were constructed from maximum likelihood analysis of its ITS-2 rDNA sequences. Results These nematodes had a slender body terminating anteriorly at a conspicuous dorsal lancet. A pair of lateral cervical papillae distant from the anterior end was observed. The buccal aperture was hexagonal and surrounded by two amphids, six externo-labial papillae, and four cephalic papillae. Males terminated posteriorly at a bursa supported by spicules and lateral and dorsal rays. Females were linguiform and knobbed morphotypes with distinct ovijectors and a dorsal rim covering the anal pore. The taxonomy was confirmed by the morphology and number of the longitudinal cuticular ridges in a 43-46 range. The sequence alignment and phylogeny revealed 92% homology with H. longistipes (AJ577461.1), and the sequence was deposited into GenBank. Conclusion The present study describes H. longistipes morphologically and molecularly which facilitates further discrimination of this species worldwide.
Collapse
|
2
|
Austin LV, Budischak SA, Ramadhin J, Hoberg EP, Abrams A, Jolles AE, Ezenwa VO. A comparison of two methods for quantifying parasitic nematode fecundity. Parasitol Res 2017; 116:1597-1602. [PMID: 28357577 DOI: 10.1007/s00436-017-5436-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Accurate measures of nematode fecundity can provide important information for investigating parasite life history evolution, transmission potential, and effects on host health. Understanding differences among fecundity assessment protocols and standardizing methods, where possible, will enable comparisons across different studies and host and parasite species and systems. Using the trichostrongyle nematode Cooperia fuelleborni isolated from wild African buffalo (Syncerus caffer), we compared egg recovery and enumeration between two methods for measuring the fecundity of female worms. The first method, in utero egg count, involves visual enumeration of the eggs via microscopic inspection of the uterine system. The second method, ex utero egg count, involves dissolving the same specimens from above in a sodium chloride solution to release the eggs from the female's uterus, then enumeration under an inverted microscope. On average, the ex utero method resulted in 34% more eggs than the in utero method. However, results indicate that the two methods used to quantify parasitic nematode fecundity are highly correlated. Thus, while both methods are viable options for estimating relative nematode fecundity, we recommend caution in undertaking comparative studies that utilize egg count data collected using different methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren V Austin
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.,Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 310 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA
| | - Sarah A Budischak
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. .,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106A Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544-2016, USA.
| | - Jessica Ramadhin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, 510 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Eric P Hoberg
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Art Abrams
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA
| | - Anna E Jolles
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, 105 Magruder Hall, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA
| | - Vanessa O Ezenwa
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 E. Green St, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.,Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, 510 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hoberg EP, Zarlenga DS. Evolution and Biogeography of Haemonchus contortus: Linking Faunal Dynamics in Space and Time. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2017; 93:1-30. [PMID: 27238001 DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
History is the foundation that informs about the nuances of faunal assembly that are essential in understanding the dynamic nature of the host-parasite interface. All of our knowledge begins and ends with evolution, ecology and biogeography, as these interacting facets determine the history of biodiverse systems. These components, relating to Haemonchus, can inform about the complex history of geographical distribution, host association and the intricacies of host-parasite associations that are played out in physiological and behavioural processes that influence the potential for disease and our capacity for effective control in a rapidly changing world. Origins and evolutionary diversification among species of the genus Haemonchus and Haemonchus contortus occurred in a complex crucible defined by shifts in environmental structure emerging from cycles of climate change and ecological perturbation during the late Tertiary and through the Quaternary. A history of sequential host colonization associated with waves of dispersal bringing assemblages of ungulates from Eurasia into Africa and processes emerging from ecosystems in collision and faunal turnover defined the arena for radiation among 12 recognized species of Haemonchus. Among congeners, the host range for H. contortus is exceptionally broad, including species among artiodactyls of 40 genera representing 5 families (and within 12 tribes of Bovidae). Broad host range is dramatically reflected in the degree to which translocation, introduction and invasion with host switching, has characterized an expanding distribution over time in North America, South America, southern Eurasia, Australia and New Zealand, coincidental with agriculture, husbandry and global colonization by human populations driven particularly by European exploration after the 1500s. African origins in xeric to mesic habitats of the African savannah suggest that historical constraints linked to ecological adaptations (tolerances and developmental thresholds defined by temperature and humidity for larval stages) will be substantial determinants in the potential outcomes for widespread geographical and host colonization which are predicted to unfold over the coming century. Insights about deeper evolutionary events, ecology and biogeography are critical as understanding history informs us about the possible range of responses in complex systems under new regimes of environmental forcing, especially, in this case, ecological perturbation linked to climate change. A deeper history of perturbation is relevant in understanding contemporary systems that are now strongly structured by events of invasion and colonization. The relaxation of abiotic and biotic controls on the occurrence of H. contortus, coincidental with inception and dissemination of anthelmintic resistance may be synergistic, serving to exacerbate challenges to control parasites or to limit the socioeconomic impacts of infection that can influence food security and availability. Studies of haemonchine nematodes contribute directly to an expanding model about the nature of diversity and the evolutionary trajectories for faunal assembly among complex host-parasite systems across considerable spatial and temporal scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E P Hoberg
- US National Parasite Collection and Animal Parasitic Disease Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, United States
| | - D S Zarlenga
- Animal Parasitic Disease Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zarlenga D, Hoberg E, Tuo W. The Identification of Haemonchus Species and Diagnosis of Haemonchosis. ADVANCES IN PARASITOLOGY 2016; 93:145-80. [PMID: 27238005 DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2016.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Diagnosis is often equated with identification or detection when discussing parasitic diseases. Unfortunately, these are not necessarily mutually exclusive activities; diseases and infections are generally diagnosed and organisms are identified. Diagnosis is commonly predicated upon some clinical signs; in an effort to determine the causative agent, identification of genera and species is subsequently performed. Both identification and diagnosis play critical roles in managing an infection, and involve the interplay of direct and indirect methods of detection, particularly in light of the complex and expanding problem of drug-resistance in parasites. Accurate and authoritative identification that is cost- and time-effective, based on structural and molecular attributes of specimens, provides a foundation for defining parasite diversity and changing patterns of geographical distribution, host association and emergence of disease. Most techniques developed thus far have been grounded in assumptions based on strict host associations between Haemonchus contortus and small ruminants, that is, sheep and goats, and between Haemonchus placei and bovids. Current research and increasing empirical evidence of natural infections in the field demonstrates that this assumption misrepresents the host associations for these species of Haemonchus. Furthermore, the capacity of H. contortus to utilize a considerably broad spectrum of ungulate hosts is reflected in our understanding of the role of anthropogenic forcing, the 'breakdown' of ecological isolation, global introduction and host switching as determinants of distribution. Nuanced insights about distribution, host association and epidemiology have emerged over the past 30years, coincidently with the development of increasingly robust means for parasite identification. In this review and for the sake of argument, we would like to delineate the diagnosis of haemonchosis from the identification of the specific pathogen. As a foundation for exploring host and parasite biology, we will examine the evolution of methods for distinguishing H. contortus from other common gastrointestinal nematodes of agriculturally significant and free-ranging wild ruminants using morphological, molecular and/or immunological methods for studies at the species and genus levels.
Collapse
|
5
|
Morsy K, Bashtar AR, Fol M, Yehia S. Haemonchus longistipes Railliet & Henry, 1909 (Nematoda, Trichostrongylidae) from the Egyptian dromedary, Camelus dromedarius (Artiodactyla: Camelidae), first identification on the basis of light and ultrastructural data. Parasitol Res 2014; 113:4579-85. [DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-4148-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
6
|
Hoberg ER, Lichtenfels JR, Gibbons L. PHYLOGENY FOR SPECIES OF HAEMONCHUS (NEMATODA: TRICHOSTRONGYLOIDEA): CONSIDERATIONS OF THEIR EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY AND GLOBAL BIOGEOGRAPHY AMONG CAMELIDAE AND PECORA (ARTIODACTYLA). J Parasitol 2004; 90:1085-102. [PMID: 15562609 DOI: 10.1645/ge-3309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Phylogenetic analysis of 25 morphological characters among the 12 species of Haemonchus resulted in 1 most parsimonious tree (60 steps; consistency index = 0.67, retention index = 0.80). Monophyly for Haemonchus was diagnosed by 3 unequivocal synapomorphies, including the asymmetric origin of the dorsal ray, relative size of the ventral rays, and the presence of a barb on each spicule tip. Species of Haemonchus have complex histories with respect to host and geographic associations: (1) origins in Africa with basal diversification in antelopes (H. krugeri, H. lawrencei, H. dinniki, H. horaki), (2) independent events of colonization for those species in Caprini and Bovinae (H. contortus, H. placei, H. bedfordi, H. similis), (3) colonization and development of core host associations within Camelidae (H. longistipes) and among Antilopinae, Tragelaphini, and Giraffidae (H. mitchelli, H. okapiae, H. vegliai), and (4) geographically widespread species that are represented only by those that have been translocated with domestic stock. The North American fauna is characterized by 3 introduced and exotic species, H. placei, H. contortus, H. similis, which emphasizes the importance of continued documentation of faunal diversity in the context of predictive foundations derived from phylogenetic studies. Satellite associations for species of Haemonchus, particularly among Cervidae and Camelidae in the Neotropics and Cervidae, Antilocapridae, and possibly wild Caprinae in the Nearctic, have been a consequence of introductions and exchange of parasites at historical interfaces for managed and natural ecosystems. Such distributions are emblematic of the overriding significance of anthropogenic factors as determinants of the global distributions for pathogenic parasites in domestic and wild ruminants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric R Hoberg
- US. National Parasite Collection and the Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-2350, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lichtenfels JR, Pilitt PA, Gibbons LM. OVEJECTOR STRUCTURE IN THE HAEMONCHINAE (NEMATODA:TRICHOSTRONGYLOIDEA) OF RUMINANTS. J Parasitol 2003; 89:984-93. [PMID: 14627148 DOI: 10.1645/ge-3162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of ovejector structure in the phylogeny of the Haemonchinae is hampered by differences among nematologists in the application of terminology and the recognition of homologous parts. Some workers recognize a sphincter with 2 parts, but others recognize only the proximal, rounded part of the sphincter and include the distal cylindrical part of the sphincter with the vestibule. The results of this study demonstrate that all sphincters of Haemonchinae of ruminants have 2 parts. To encourage the application of a uniform terminology to homologous parts of the ovejector, we propose the use of the terms "sphincter 1" for the rounded part and "sphincter 2" for the cylindrical part. It is hoped that clarification of the terminology for ovejectors of the Haemonchinae will provide a model useful for improving descriptions of ovejectors throughout the Trichostrongyloidea.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ralph Lichtenfels
- United States National Parasite Collection, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, BARC-East No. 1180, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, Maryland 20705, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|