Isolated endarteritis and kidney transplant survival: a multicenter collaborative study

The Histological Spectrum and Clinical Significance of T Cell-mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) remains a significant cause of long-term kidney allograft loss, either indirectly through induction of donor-specific anti-HLA alloantibodies or directly through chronic active TCMR. Whether found by indication or protocol biopsy, Banff defined acute TCMR should be treated with antirejection therapy and maximized maintenance immunosuppression. Neither isolated interstitial inflammation in the absence of tubulitis nor isolated tubulitis in the absence of interstitial inflammation results in adverse outcomes, and neither requires antirejection treatment. RNA gene expression analysis of biopsy material may supplement conventional histology, especially in ambiguous cases. Lesser degrees of tubular and interstitial inflammation (Banff borderline) may portend adverse outcomes and should be treated when found on an indication biopsy. Borderline lesions on protocol biopsies may resolve spontaneously but require close follow-up if untreated. Following antirejection therapy of acute TCMR, surveillance protocol biopsies should be considered. Minimally invasive blood-borne assays (donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene expression profiling) are being increasingly studied as a means of following stable patients in lieu of biopsy. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness require confirmation in randomized controlled trials. Treatment of acute TCMR is not standardized but involves bolus corticosteroids with lymphocyte depleting antibodies for severe, refractory, or relapsing cases. Arteritis may be found with acute TCMR, active antibody-mediated rejection, or mixed rejections and should be treated accordingly. The optimal treatment ofchronic active TCMR is uncertain. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to optimally define therapy.

How Should Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection of Kidney Transplants Be Treated: Importance of Follow-up Biopsy

Background.

Limited published data exist to guide patient monitoring after the treatment of T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) of kidney allografts.

Methods.

We reviewed the kidney function and histological outcomes after treatment of 163 first episodes of biopsy-proven TCMR between January 1‚ 2015‚ and July 31‚ 2020.

Results.

Of the 146 patients treated with steroid pulse alone, complete histological response was seen in 83% of patients with borderline rejection, 82.5% with grade 1A, 67% with grade 1B, and 50% with grade IIA. Of the 17 patients treated with steroids plus antithymocyte globulin, the complete histological response rate was 100% with grade 1A, 75% with grade 1B, 100% with grade IIA, and 57% with grade IIB. Among the patients with complete response as assessed by kidney function, 14% only had a partial or no response histologically. Among patients with no kidney function response, 68% had a complete response histologically.

Conclusion.

We thus find that responses based on kidney function alone do not correlate well with histological responses. If further treatment had been based solely on changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate, a significant number of patients would have been subsequently undertreated or overtreated. These results support the use of protocol follow-up biopsies after the treatment of TCMR.

The Pathological and Clinical Diversity of Acute Vascular Rejection in Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Vascular rejection (VR) is characterized by arteritis, steroid resistance, and increased graft loss but is poorly described using modern diagnostics.

METHODS

We screened 3715 consecutive biopsies and retrospectively evaluated clinical and histological phenotypes of VR (n = 100) against rejection without arteritis (v0REJ, n = 540) and normal controls (n = 1108).

RESULTS

Biopsy sample size affected the likelihood of arterial sampling, VR diagnosis, and final Banff v scores (P < 0.001). Local v and cv scores were greatest in larger arteries (n = 258). VR comprised 15.6% of all rejection episodes, presented earlier (median 1.0 mo, interquartile range, 0.4-8 mo) with higher serum creatinine levels and inferior graft survival, versus v0REJ (P < 0.001). Early VR (≤1 mo) was common (54%) and predicted by sensitization, delayed function, and prior corticosteroid use, with associated acute dysfunction and optimal therapeutic response, independent of Banff v score. Late VR followed under-immunosuppression in 71.4% (noncompliance 38.8%, iatrogenic 32.6%), and was associated with chronic interstitial fibrosis, incomplete renal functional recovery and persistent inflammation using sequential histopathology. The etiology was "pure" antibody-mediated VR (n = 21), mixed VR (n = 36), and "pure" T cell-mediated VR (n = 43). Isolated VR (n = 34, Banff i < 1 without tubulitis) comprised 24 T cell-mediated VR and 10 antibody-mediated VR, presenting with mild renal dysfunction, minimal Banff acute scores, and better graft survival compared with inflamed VR. Interstitial inflammation influenced acute renal dysfunction and early treatment response, whereas chronic tubulointerstitial damage determined long-term graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

VR is a heterogenous entity influenced by time-of-onset, pathophysiology, accompanying interstitial inflammation and fibrosis. Adequate histological sampling is essential for its accurate diagnostic classification and treatment.

Early-Isolated V Lesion in Kidney Allograft: Acute Rejection or Ischemic Injury? A Case Report of Primary Nonfunction and Graft Loss

Intimal arteritis (v-lesion) is a negative prognostic factor for kidney allograft survival. Early isolated v-lesions do not always represent a pathologic marker of acute T cell- or antibody-mediated rejection. In particular, in the case of transplant negative for C4d and donor-specific antibodies, such a finding can suggest an ischemic-reperfusion injury. There is an intense debate in the literature concerning the origin of this histologic feature. In the present study, we analyze how this argument can have a clinical relevance. Here we report a case of a 61-year-old woman with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. The patient underwent kidney transplant from expanded criteria donor. Organs from expanded criteria donors are more prone to ischemic-reperfusion injury. Postoperative course was characterized by primary nonfunction of the graft. A first biopsy showed early isolated v-lesion in otherwise normal renal parenchymal. Simultaneously, a computed tomography scan revealed stenosis of the main renal artery. An endovascular stent was placed. Despite improved vascularization of the graft, no clinical response was observed and the patient remained anuric. A second biopsy was performed, showing T-cell mediated rejection (Banff Classification 1A). Despite pulse steroid, the patient lost the graft.

TNFRSF13B genotypes control immune-mediated pathology by regulating the functions of innate B cells

Host genes define the severity of inflammation and immunity but specific loci doing so are unknown. Here we show that TNF receptor superfamily member 13B (TNFRSF13B) variants, which enhance defense against certain pathogens, also control immune-mediated injury of transplants, by regulating innate B cells’ functions. Analysis of TNFRSF13B in human kidney transplant recipients revealed that 33% of those with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but fewer than 6% of those with stable graft function had TNFRSF13B missense mutations. To explore mechanisms underlying aggressive immune responses, we investigated alloimmunity and rejection in mice. Cardiac allografts in Tnfrsf13b-mutant mice underwent early and severe AMR. The dominance and precocity of AMR in Tnfrsf13b-deficient mice were not caused by increased alloantibodies. Rather, Tnfrsf13b mutations decreased “natural” IgM and compromised complement regulation, leading to complement deposition in allografted hearts and autogenous kidneys. Thus, WT TNFRSF13B and Tnfrsf13b support innate B cell functions that limit complement-associated inflammation; in contrast, common variants of these genes intensify inflammatory responses that help clear microbial infections but allow inadvertent tissue injury to ensue. The wide variation in inflammatory reactions associated with TNFRSF13B diversity suggests polymorphisms could underlie variation in host defense and explosive inflammatory responses that sometimes enhance morbidity associated with immune responses.

Clinical Significance of Isolated V1 Arteritis in Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The presence of intimal arteritis (v) in renal allograft biopsy specimens establishes the presence of acute T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), Grade IIa-III, according to the Banff classification of rejection. The clinical significance of isolated v1 lesions (v1), characterized by arteritis alone, compared with lesions of arteritis with tubulointerstitial inflammation (i-t-v) has been controversial.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 280 patients undergoing renal transplantation between 2005 and 2015 who received a "for cause" transplant biopsy using the Banff 2013 classification. Patients with TCMR grade IIa (n = 83) were subdivided into groups with isolated v1 arteritis and i-t-v. Pre- and postoperative renal function, graft survival, and overall survival were evaluated in all patients.

RESULTS

Donor and recipient demographics were similar between groups. One month following treatment of rejection, patients with v1 disease had superior recovery of glomerular filtration rate vs patients with i-t-v (P < .002). At a median follow-up of 41 months from transplant, death-censored graft survival was 92% vs 79% (P = .04), and overall survival was 98% vs 79% (P < .004) in the isolated v1 and i-t-v groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite having identical Banff classification of TCMR IIa, our results indicate that graft survival in patients with isolated v1 rejection is superior to those with i-t-v. Following corroboration with data from other centers, modification of the Banff classification scheme should be considered.

Molecular Analysis of Renal Allograft Biopsies: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going?

A renal core biopsy for histological evaluation is the gold standard for diagnosing renal transplant pathology. However, renal biopsy interpretation is subjective and can render insufficient precision, making it difficult to apply a targeted therapeutic regimen for the individual patient. This warrants a need for additional methods assessing disease state in the renal transplant. Significant research activity has been focused on the role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis of renal allograft rejection. The identification of specific molecular expression patterns in allograft biopsies related to different types of allograft injury could provide valuable information about the processes underlying renal transplant dysfunction and can be used for the development of molecular classifier scores, which could improve our diagnostic and prognostic ability and could guide treatment. Molecular profiling has the potential to be more precise and objective than histological evaluation and may identify injury even before it becomes visible on histology, making it possible to start treatment at the earliest time possible. Combining conventional diagnostics (histology, serology, and clinical data) and molecular evaluation will most likely offer the best diagnostic approach. We believe that the use of state-of-the-art molecular analysis will have a significant impact in diagnostics after renal transplantation. In this review, we elaborate on the molecular phenotype of both acute and chronic T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection and discuss the additive value of molecular profiling in the setting of diagnosing renal allograft rejection and how this will improve transplant patient care.

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection: Banff classification and beyond

Diagnosis of renal transplant rejection is dependent on interpretation of renal allograft biopsies. The Banff Classification of Allograft Pathology, which was developed as a standardized working classification system in 1991, has contributed to the standardization of definitions for histologic injuries resulting from renal allograft rejections and provided a universal grading system for assessing these injuries. It has also helped to provide insight into the underlying pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to transplant rejection. In addition to histological and immunologic parameters, molecular tools are now being used to facilitate the diagnosis of rejection. In this review, I will discuss morphologic features of renal transplant rejections as well as major revisions and pitfalls of the Banff classification system, and provide future perspectives.

Isolated Vascular Lesions (IVL) in Early Allograft Biopsies: A Case Series

This case series includes five patients diagnosed as isolated vascular lesion (IVL) on allograft biopsy in an early post-transplant period. These patients presented with graft dysfunction. The biopsies satisfied the criteria for IVL as laid down by Banff 2009. Four of these patients were treated with corticosteroids and other anti rejection measures. C4d and DSA were negative in all. The patients showed good response to treatment with stable graft function at the longest follow-up of one year. We have also reviewed the literature about IVL as a specific entity. There are differences between the molecular and clinical data of IVL. It is difficult to differentiate whether IVL is a rejection or non-rejection process. This study aims to highlight the importance of a rare entity.

Early isolated V-lesion may not truly represent rejection of the kidney allograft

Intimal arteritis is known to be a negative prognostic factor for kidney allograft survival. Isolated v-lesion (IV) is defined as intimal arteritis with minimal tubulointerstitial inflammation (TI). Although the Banff classification assesses IV as T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), clinical, and prognostic significance of early IV (early IV, eIV) with negative C4d and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) remains unclear. To help resolve if such eIV truly represents acute rejection, a molecular study was performed. The transcriptome of eIV (n=6), T cell-mediated vascular rejection with rich TI (T cell-mediated vascular rejection, TCMRV, n=4) and non-rejection histologic findings (n=8) was compared using microarrays. A total of 310 genes were identified to be deregulated in TCMRV compared with eIV. Gene enrichment analysis categorized deregulated genes to be associated primarily with T-cells associated biological processes involved in an innate and adaptive immune and inflammatory response. Comparison of deregulated gene lists between the study groups and controls showed only a 1.7% gene overlap. Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis revealed clear distinction of eIV from TCMRV and showed similarity with a control group. Up-regulation of immune response genes in TCMRV was validated using RT-qPCR in a different set of eIV (n=12) and TCMRV (n=8) samples. The transcriptome of early IV (< 1 month) with negative C4d and DSA is associated with a weak immune signature compared with TCMRV and shows similarity with normal findings. Such eIV may feature non-rejection origin and reflect an injury distinct from an alloimmune response. The present study supports use of molecular methods when interpreting kidney allograft biopsy findings.

Isolated v-lesion represents a benign phenotype of vascular rejection of the kidney allograft - a retrospective study

While the detrimental impact of the humoral acute vascular rejection (AVR) phenotype is recognized, the prognostic significance of isolated v-lesion (IV) remains unclear. In this retrospective single-centre study, AVR was found in 98 of 1015 patients (9.7%) who had undergone kidney transplantation in 2010-2014, with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) evaluated in all of them. The outcome of four AVR phenotypes was evaluated during median follow-up of 59 months; in 25 patients with IV, 18 with T-cell-mediated vascular rejection (TCMVR), 19 with antibody-mediated vascular rejection (AMVR) and 36 with suspected antibody-mediated rejection (sAMVR). AVR was diagnosed mainly by for-cause biopsy (81%) early after transplantation (median 19 POD) and appeared as mild-grade intimal arteritis. IV occurred in low-sensitized patients after the first transplantation (96%) in the absence of DSA. IV responded satisfactorily to treatment (88%), showed no persistence of rejection in surveillance biopsy, and had stable graft function, minimal proteinuria and excellent DCGS (96%). Contrary to that, Kaplan-Meier estimate of 3-year DCGS of AMVR was 66% (log-rank = 0.0004). Early IV represents a benign phenotype of AVR with a favourable outcome. This study prompts further research to evaluate the nature of IV before considering any change in the classification and management.

Isolated vascular "v" lesions in liver allografts: How to approach this unusual finding

According to the Banff criteria for kidney allografts, isolated vascular or "v" lesions are defined as intimal inflammation, age-inappropriate fibro-intimal hyperplasia, or both, without the presence of associated interstitial T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR). In general, these lesions portend a worse outcome for kidney allografts, particularly in those where the "v" lesions are identified in patients with coexistent donor specific antibodies (DSA) or later after transplantation. Although affected arteries are rarely sampled in liver allograft biopsies, we identified nine patients at a mean of 1805 days posttransplantation and compared these to matched controls. Almost half (4 of 9) of the study patient biopsies showed inflammatory arteritis associated with focal or diffuse C4d positivity, which was not observed in matched controls. One "v" lesion patient progressed to rejection-related graft failure and two developed moderate/severe TCMR in subsequent biopsies, whereas only one rejection episode occurred in follow-up biopsies, and no rejection-related deaths or graft failures were detected in controls. In conclusion, patients with liver allograft isolated "v" lesions should undergo further evaluation and closer follow-up for impending TCMR and/or underlying co-existent chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR).

Isolated v-lesion in kidney transplant recipients: Characteristics, association with DSA, and histological follow-up

Isolated v-lesion (IvL) represents a rare and challenging situation in renal allograft biopsies because it is unknown whether IvL truly represents rejection, antibody- or T cell-mediated, or not. This multicentric retrospective study describes the clinicopathological features of IvL with an emphasis on the donor-specific antibody (DSA) status, histological follow-up, and graft survival. Inclusion criteria were the presence of v-lesion with minimal interstitial (i ≤ 1) and microvascular inflammation (g + ptc≤1). C4d-positive biopsies were excluded. We retrospectively found 33 IvL biopsies in 33 patients, mainly performed in the early posttransplantation period (median time 27 days) and clinically indicated in 66.7%. A minority of recipients (5/33, 15.2%) had DSA at the time of biopsy. IvL was treated by anti-rejection therapy in 21 cases (63.6%), whereas 12 (36.4%) were untreated. Seventy percent of untreated patients and 66% of treated patients showed favorable histological evolution on subsequent biopsy. Kidney graft survival in IvL was significantly higher than in a matched cohort of antibody-mediated rejection with arteritis. In conclusion, IvL is not primarily antibody-mediated and may show a favorable evolution. The heterogeneity of IvL pathophysiology on early biopsies should prompt DSA testing as well as close clinical and histological follow-up in all patients with IvL.

Isolated V-Lesion in an ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Recipient Receiving Rituximab

We report an ABO-incompatible kidney transplant performed on a 69-year-old female patient, whose donor was her 69-year-old husband. The patient received an immunosuppressive protocol using rituximab without splenectomy. Renal biopsy was done on posttransplant day 8 due to poor early graft function, and an isolated v-lesion was found, which responded to steroid pulse therapy and gusperimus hydrochloride administration. Our results indicate that isolated v-lesions can occur in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients receiving rituximab and that this finding should be treated as acute rejection. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an isolated v-lesion in an ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipient who had been administered rituximab.

Evaluation of Microvascular Inflammation in ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

In ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, the diagnostic criteria for antibody-mediated rejection remain controversial because C4d deposition is commonly observed. Thus, we investigated microvascular inflammation (MVI score ≥ 2) within 1 year as a predictor of graft outcome.

METHODS

A total of 148 recipients without preformed or de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody were stratified based on MVI score less than 2 (n = 117) and MVI score of 2 or greater (n = 31).

RESULTS

We found that 5-year graft survival was significantly lower (P = 0.0129) in patients with MVI (89.8%) than in patients without MVI (97.0%). Graft function, as characterized by serum estimated glomerular filtration rate, was also significantly worse for patients with MVI than it was for patients without MVI, between 3 months and 10 years after transplantation (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis indicated that HLA class II mismatch (P = 0.0085) was an independent marker of MVI.

CONCLUSIONS

Microvascular inflammation score of 2 or greater is significantly associated with poor graft outcome after ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. We suggest that MVI score of 2 or greater in ABOi transplantation be used as a basis to diagnose antibody-mediated rejection.

Current status of pediatric renal transplant pathology

Histopathology is still an indispensable tool for the diagnosis of kidney transplant dysfunction in adult and pediatric patients. This review presents consolidated knowledge, recent developments and future prospects on the biopsy procedure, the diagnostic work-up, classification schemes, the histopathology of rejection, including antibody-mediated forms, ABO-incompatible transplants, protocol biopsies, recurrent and de novo disease, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, infectious complications and drug-induced toxicity. It is acknowledged that frequently the correct diagnosis can only be reached in consensus with clinical, serological, immunogenetical, bacteriological and virological findings. This review shall enhance the understanding of the pediatric nephrologist for the thought processes of nephropathologists with the aim to facilitate teamwork between these specialist groups for the benefit of the patient.

The Banff 2015 Kidney Meeting Report: Current Challenges in Rejection Classification and Prospects for Adopting Molecular Pathology

The XIII Banff meeting, held in conjunction the Canadian Society of Transplantation in Vancouver, Canada, reviewed the clinical impact of updates of C4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) from the 2013 meeting, reports from active Banff Working Groups, the relationships of donor-specific antibody tests (anti-HLA and non-HLA) with transplant histopathology, and questions of molecular transplant diagnostics. The use of transcriptome gene sets, their resultant diagnostic classifiers, or common key genes to supplement the diagnosis and classification of rejection requires further consensus agreement and validation in biopsies. Newly introduced concepts include the i-IFTA score, comprising inflammation within areas of fibrosis and atrophy and acceptance of transplant arteriolopathy within the descriptions of chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) or chronic ABMR. The pattern of mixed TCMR and ABMR was increasingly recognized. This report also includes improved definitions of TCMR and ABMR in pancreas transplants with specification of vascular lesions and prospects for defining a vascularized composite allograft rejection classification. The goal of the Banff process is ongoing integration of advances in histologic, serologic, and molecular diagnostic techniques to produce a consensus-based reporting system that offers precise composite scores, accurate routine diagnostics, and applicability to next-generation clinical trials.

Current pathological perspectives on chronic rejection in renal allografts

Chronic rejection in renal transplantation clinically manifests as slow deterioration in allograft function and is a major contributor of late renal graft loss. Most cases of chronic rejection involve chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) triggered by the interaction of donor-specific alloantibodies with endothelial cells of the microcirculation. The evolution of the Banff classification involved a major revision of the ABMR criteria during the 2000s and led to the inclusion of detailed pathological characteristics of chronic ABMR in the 2013 Banff scheme, including microcirculation damage observed as newly formed basement membranes and arterial fibrous intimal proliferation. Inflammation of microvasculature including glomeruli and/or peritubular capillaries is also seen in substantial cases of chronic ABMR, defined as chronic active ABMR. Chronic active T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) results from chronic T cell-mediated injury involving renal arteries but is less characterized under the current Banff classification, mainly due to the expanding histological criteria of chronic active ABMR. Characteristics shared by these two chronic rejection types can potentially cause diagnostic confusion. Hence, the diagnostic criteria or categories of chronic renal rejection require amendment of the current Banff classification. Assessment of rejection cases with molecular phenotyping advanced the mechanistic understanding of various dysfunctions in renal allograft, including ABMR and TCMR. Identification of disease-specific changes in gene expression by immunohistological studies, especially in chronic ABMR, has already been validated by several studies, warranting potential application to the pathological diagnostic process. This review provides an overview of current pathological perspectives on chronic rejection of renal allografts and future directions.

Efficacy of Acute Cellular Rejection Treatment According to Banff Score in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

The poor prognosis classically associated with Banff grade 2 acute cell-mediated rejection (CMR) may be due to unrecognized antibody-mediated damage. We thus performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the rate of response to treatment in kidney transplant recipients with pure CMR, stratified by Banff class.

Methods

In addition to a manual search, databases interrogated included Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) databases, Central, PubMed and CINAHL. Studies providing functional and/or histological response rates to the treatment of CMR rejection by Banff class (1997 or more recent) were included.

Results

Among the 746 articles identified, 5 articles were included in the final review. Two studies excluded some, and 2 excluded all features of antibody-mediated rejection, while providing data on functional recovery. The absence of functional recovery was reported in 4% of borderline, 15% for Banff grade 1A and IB pooled, 0% to 25% of Banff grade 1B alone, 11% to 20% of Banff grade 2A, and 38% of Banff grade 2B rejections.

Conclusions

The rate of functional recovery of pure Banff IIA CMR overlapped with that of Banff grade 1 CMR, whereas Banff grade 2B showed worse prognosis. There was important heterogeneity in the definition of response to treatment and paucity of data describing the histological response to treatment stratified by Banff class. There is a pressing need to standardize outcome metrics for the reversibility of rejection in kidney transplant recipients in order to design high-quality trials for novel therapeutic alternatives.

Early Posttransplant Isolated v1 Lesion Does Not Need to Be Treated and Does Not Lead to Increased Fibrosis

Acute vascular rejection (AVR) is characterized by intimal arteritis in addition to tubulitis and interstitial inflammation. It is associated with a poorer prognosis compared to tubulointerstitial rejection (AIR) and AVR is associated with a higher rate of graft loss than AIR. The prognosis and treatment of arteritis without tubulitis and interstitial inflammation (isolated v1 lesion) are still controversial. We report a case of a patient who had a biopsy of the kidney allograft for evaluation of slow graft function. The biopsy revealed an isolated v1 lesion. However, we chose not to augment immunosuppression. The patient's kidney allograft function improved over time with close monitoring. Repeat biopsy a year later showed no evidence of endothelialitis and relatively unchanged fibrosis and no other abnormalities. Although it is suggested that most cases of isolated v1 lesions will respond to corticosteroids or T cell depleting therapies, some cases will improve with conservative management. Further studies are needed to determine which cases could be managed conservatively.

The Revised (2013) Banff Classification for Antibody-Mediated Rejection of Renal Allografts: Update, Difficulties, and Future Considerations

The Banff 2013 classification (Banff 2013) for antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal allografts represents the first major revision of the original Banff classification for ABMR that was published in 2003. The main impetus for this revision was the need to include C4d-negative ABMR, although this revised classification contains a number of additional features based on findings reported from 2007 to 2013. Since its publication, several studies have examined the validity of different aspects of Banff 2013 and compared it to earlier (2003, 2007) versions of the Banff ABMR classification. Recent evidence, albeit limited, indicates that Banff 2013 represents an improvement over the previous versions, enhancing our ability to accurately diagnose cases of acute/active and chronic active ABMR on renal allograft biopsy. Molecular studies appear to justify the threshold value of glomerulitis plus peritubular capillaritis score ≥2 required by Banff 2013 for the diagnosis of C4d-negative ABMR; however, other aspects of the classification, including its overall interobserver reproducibility, the clinical significance of the category of C4d staining without evidence of rejection, and whether surrogate markers might potentially substitute for the requirement for the presence of donor-specific antibodies, require additional investigation.

Using Molecular Phenotyping to Guide Improvements in the Histologic Diagnosis of T Cell-Mediated Rejection

Recognition that some lesions typical of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) also occur in antibody-mediated rejection requires revision of the histologic TCMR definition. To guide this process, we assessed the relative importance of various lesions and the performance of new histology diagnostic algorithms, using molecular TCMR scores as histology-independent estimates of true TCMR. In 703 indication biopsies, random forest analysis and logistic regression indicated that interstitial infiltrate (i-lesions) and tubulitis (t-lesions) were the key histologic predictors of molecular TCMR, with arteritis (v-lesions) having less importance. Histology predicted molecular TCMR more accurately when diagnoses were assigned by strictly applying the Banff rules to the lesion scores and redefining isolated v-lesion TCMR. This improved prediction from area under the curve (AUC) 0.70 with existing rules to AUC 0.80. Further improvements were achieved by introducing more categories to reflect inflammation (AUC 0.84), by summing the lesion scores (AUC 0.85) and by logistic regression (AUC 0.90). We concluded that histologic assessment of TCMR can be improved by placing more emphasis on i- and t-lesions and incorporating new algorithms for diagnosis. Nevertheless, some discrepancies between histologic and molecular diagnoses persist, partially due to the inherent nonspecificity of i- and t-lesions, and molecular methods will be required to help resolve these cases.

Reassessing the Significance of Intimal Arteritis in Kidney Transplant Biopsy Specimens

Intimal arteritis (the presence of v-lesions) in kidney transplant biopsy specimens is believed to have major prognostic and diagnostic significance. We assessed the relationship of v-lesions to prognosis in 703 indication biopsy specimens and used microarray-based molecular tests to re-examine the relationship of v-lesions to rejection. v-Lesions were noted in 49 specimens (7%) and were usually mild (v1). The presence of v-lesions had no effect on graft survival compared with the absence of v-lesions. Pathologists using current conventions almost always interpreted v-lesions as reflecting T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), either pure or mixed with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). The molecular scores questioned the conventional diagnoses in 29 of 49 specimens (59%), including ten that were conventional TCMR with no molecular rejection and nine that were conventional TCMR mixed with pure ABMR molecularly. The presence of tubulointerstitial inflammation (i-t) meeting TCMR criteria allowed subclassification of v-lesion specimens into 21 i-t-v-lesion specimens and 28 isolated v-lesion specimens. Molecular TCMR scores were positive in 95% of i-t-v-lesion specimens but only 21% of isolated v-lesion specimens. Molecular ABMR scores were often positive in isolated v-lesion biopsies (46%). Time of biopsy after transplantation was critical for understanding isolated v-lesions: most early isolated v-lesion specimens had no molecular rejection and were DSA negative, whereas most isolated >1 year after transplantation had positive DSA and ABMR scores. Therefore, v-lesions in indication biopsy specimens do not affect prognosis and can reflect TCMR, ABMR, or no rejection. Time after transplantation, DSA, and accompanying inflammation provide probabilistic basis for interpreting v-lesions.