1
|
Ettenger RB, Seifert ME, Blydt-Hansen T, Briscoe DM, Holman J, Weng PL, Srivastava R, Fleming J, Malekzadeh M, Pearl M. Detection of Subclinical Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Current and Future Practices. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14836. [PMID: 39147695 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The successes in the field of pediatric kidney transplantation over the past 60 years have been extraordinary. Year over year, there have been significant improvements in short-term graft survival. However, improvements in longer-term outcomes have been much less apparent. One important contributor has been the phenomenon of low-level rejection in the absence of clinical manifestations-so-called subclinical rejection (SCR). METHODS Traditionally, rejection has been diagnosed by changes in clinical parameters, including but not limited to serum creatinine and proteinuria. This review examines the shortcomings of this approach, the effects of SCR on kidney allograft outcome, the benefits and drawbacks of surveillance biopsies to identify SCR, and new urine and blood biomarkers that define the presence or absence of SCR. RESULTS Serum creatinine is an unreliable index of SCR. Surveillance biopsies are the method most utilized to detect SCR. However, these have significant drawbacks. New biomarkers show promise. These biomarkers include blood gene expression profiles and donor derived-cell free DNA; urine gene expression profiles; urinary cytokines, chemokines, and metabolomics; and other promising blood and urine tests. CONCLUSION Specific emphasis is placed on studies carried out in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03719339.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B Ettenger
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael E Seifert
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Tom Blydt-Hansen
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, British Columbia Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - David M Briscoe
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John Holman
- Transplant Genomics Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patricia L Weng
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rachana Srivastava
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - James Fleming
- Transplant Genomics Inc., Framingham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mohammed Malekzadeh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Pearl
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harmacek D, Weidmann L, Castrezana Lopez K, Schmid N, Korach R, Bortel N, von Moos S, Rho E, Helmchen B, Gaspert A, Schachtner T. Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:1652-1663. [PMID: 38548057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Harmacek
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Weidmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Schmid
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Korach
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bortel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Rho
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bromberg JS, Bunnapradist S, Samaniego-Picota M, Anand S, Stites E, Gauthier P, Demko Z, Prewett A, Armer-Cabral M, Marshall K, Kaur N, Bloom MS, Tabriziani H, Bhorade S, Cooper M. Elevation of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Before Biopsy-proven Rejection in Kidney Transplant. Transplantation 2024; 108:1994-2004. [PMID: 38595232 PMCID: PMC11335081 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard-of-care biomarkers for renal allograft rejection are lagging indicators, signaling existing organ injury. This precludes early intervention, when immunological cascades leading to rejection are most susceptible. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) shows promise as an early indicator of rejection, allowing earlier and possibly more effective treatment. This analysis was designed to assess this promise using real-world dd-cfDNA testing evidence. METHODS This retrospective analysis of the prospective, observational ProActive registry study (NCT04091984) assessed dd-cfDNA and serum creatinine levels before biopsy in 424 patients with ≥1 dd-cfDNA test (n = 1013) in the 6 mo before biopsy. RESULTS Of 4667 enrolled patients, 1631 patients had ≥18 mo of follow-up data, of which 424 had a biopsy and were included in this analysis. Twenty-six biopsies showed antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), 62 showed T cell-mediated rejection, and 336 showed nonrejection; each from a unique patient. dd-cfDNA fractions were significantly elevated 5 mo before ABMR biopsies, and 2 mo before T cell-mediated rejection biopsies, compared with nonrejection biopsies. In contrast, serum creatinine did not discriminate between rejection and nonrejection in advance, or concurrent with biopsy. Among patients with nonrejection biopsies, estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in cases with ≥2 increased dd-cfDNA results (≥1%), compared with those with 0 or 1 increased dd-cfDNA result. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that dd-cfDNA is an early indicator of biopsy-proven rejection, especially ABMR, suggesting a greater role for dd-cfDNA in surveillance to identify patients at high risk of ongoing or future rejection, thus requiring closer monitoring, biopsy, or other management changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S. Bromberg
- Department of Surgery, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | | | - Erik Stites
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Matthew Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta G, Athreya A, Kataria A. Biomarkers in Kidney Transplantation: A Rapidly Evolving Landscape. Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00820. [PMID: 39020463 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
The last decade has seen an explosion in clinical research focusing on the use of noninvasive biomarkers in kidney transplantation. Much of the published literature focuses on donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA). Although initially studied as a noninvasive means of identifying acute rejection, it is now clear that dd-cfDNA is more appropriately described as a marker of severe injury and irrespective of the etiology, elevated dd-cfDNA ≥0.5% portends worse graft outcomes. Blood gene expression profiling is also commercially available and has mostly been studied in the context of early identification of subclinical rejection, although additional data is needed to validate these findings. Torque teno virus, a ubiquitous DNA virus, has emerged as a biomarker of immunosuppression exposure as peripheral blood Torque teno virus copy numbers might mirror the intensity of host immunosuppression. Urinary chemokine tests including C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 9 and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 have recently been assessed in large clinical trials and hold promising potential for early diagnosis of both subclinical and acute rejection, as well as, for long-term prognosis. Urinary cellular messenger RNA and exosome vesicular RNA based studies require additional validation. Although current data does not lend itself to conclusion, future studies on multimodality testing may reveal the utility of serial surveillance for individualization of immunosuppression and identify windows of opportunity to intervene early and before the irreversible allograft injury sets in.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Gupta
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
- Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Akshay Athreya
- Division of Nephrology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Ashish Kataria
- Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kalaria AL, Yamada T, Klein-Fedyshin M, Obata S, Cruz-Peralta M, Parrish B, Rahman AZ, Molinari M, Mehta RB. Subclinical rejection and allograft survival in kidney transplantation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085098. [PMID: 39025816 PMCID: PMC11261677 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Subclinical rejection (SCR) refers to the presence of acute rejection without accompanying kidney allograft dysfunction. The impact of SCR on long-term graft survival remains a subject of ongoing debate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will perform a systematic search of databases including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central, from January 1995 to November 2023. We will include English-language studies involving adult kidney transplant patients who investigated SCR. We will exclude studies focused on 'for-cause' biopsies. Both title, abstract screening and full-text screening will be performed by two or more reviewers. The primary outcome of this study will be death-censored allograft loss. The secondary outcome will include development of subsequent rejection. For time-dependent outcomes, we will prioritise HRs and the 95% CIs. In cases where HRs are unavailable, we will calculate risk ratios based on the recorded events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomised trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for cohort studies. We will employ a random effects model. We will evaluate heterogeneity using the I2 variable. We will assess publication bias by funnel plots, Begg and Mazumdar test, and Egger's test. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval does not apply as no original data will be collected. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42023463536.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Lalit Kalaria
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Takayuki Yamada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Shota Obata
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Massiel Cruz-Peralta
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bryce Parrish
- Department of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amaan Z Rahman
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rajil B Mehta
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, Thomas E Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cortes Garcia E, Giarraputo A, Racapé M, Goutaudier V, Ursule-Dufait C, de la Grange P, Adoux L, Raynaud M, Couderau C, Mezine F, Dagobert J, Bestard O, Moreso F, Villard J, Halleck F, Giral M, Brouard S, Danger R, Gourraud PA, Rabant M, Couzi L, Le Quintrec M, Kamar N, Morelon E, Vrtovsnik F, Taupin JL, Snanoudj R, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Aubert O. Antibody Mediated Rejection and T-cell Mediated Rejection Molecular Signatures Using Next-Generation Sequencing in Kidney Transplant Biopsies. Transpl Int 2024; 37:13043. [PMID: 39050190 PMCID: PMC11267505 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Recently, interest in transcriptomic assessment of kidney biopsies has been growing. This study investigates the use of NGS to identify gene expression changes and analyse the pathways involved in rejection. An Illumina bulk RNA sequencing on the polyadenylated RNA of 770 kidney biopsies was conducted. Differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) were determined for AMR and TCMR using DESeq2. Genes were segregated according to their previous descriptions in known panels (microarray or the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel) to obtain NGS-specific genes. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the Reactome and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) public repositories. The differential gene expression using NGS analysis identified 6,141 and 8,478 transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR. While most of the genes identified were included in the microarray and the B-HOT panels, NGS analysis identified 603 (9.8%) and 1,186 (14%) new specific genes. Pathways analysis showed that the B-HOT panel was associated with the main immunological processes involved during AMR and TCMR. The microarrays specifically integrated metabolic functions and cell cycle progression processes. Novel NGS-specific based transcripts associated with AMR and TCMR were discovered, which might represent a novel source of targets for drug designing and repurposing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esteban Cortes Garcia
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Alessia Giarraputo
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Maud Racapé
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Cindy Ursule-Dufait
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | | | - Lucie Adoux
- Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), INSERM, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Marc Raynaud
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Clément Couderau
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Fariza Mezine
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Jessie Dagobert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Moreso
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean Villard
- Transplantation Immunology Unit and National Reference Laboratory for Histocompatibility, Department of Diagnostic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Magali Giral
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Richard Danger
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CRT2I-Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Pierre-Antoine Gourraud
- Nantes Université, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, Clinique des données, INSERM, Centre d’Investigation Clinique 1413, Nantes, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, Bordeaux, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - François Vrtovsnik
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Bichat Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Laboratory of Immunology and Histocompatibility, Hôpital Saint-Louis Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Renaud Snanoudj
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique—Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Punjala SR, Ibrahim M, Phillips BL, Stojanovic J, Kessaris N, Shaw O, Dorling A, Mamode N. Characteristics of Early Antibody Mediated Rejection in Antibody Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12942. [PMID: 39040870 PMCID: PMC11261346 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
Antibody incompatible transplantation (AIT) may be an only option for highly sensitized patients. Severe form of early antibody mediated rejection (AMR) adversely affects graft survival after AIT. The aim of this study was to identify individuals at risk of AMR. We analyzed 213 living donor AITs performed at our center. Among 120 ABOi, 58 HLAi and 35 DSA + FCXM-negative cases, the rates of early AMR were 6%, 31%, and 9%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis for graft loss, early AMR had a HR of 3.28 (p < 0.001). The HLAi group had worse death-censored graft survival (p = 0.003). In the HLAi group, Patients with aggressive variant AMR (AAMR) had greater percentage of C3d complement fixing DSA, higher baseline class I and total DSA MFI levels and B-cell FCXM RMF. C1q and C3d complement fixing DSA and strong positivity of baseline B- or T-cell FXCM as predictors of AAMR had 100% sensitivity. Early AMR is of significant clinical concern in AIT as it results in poor graft survival and is not well described in literature. An aggressive variant is characterized by massive rise in DSA levels at rejection. Baseline DSA, C1q, and C3d and baseline FCXM values can be used to risk-stratify candidates for AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sai Rithin Punjala
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Ibrahim
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Lyle Phillips
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jelena Stojanovic
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicos Kessaris
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Shaw
- Clinical Transplantation Lab, Viapath, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation Biology, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Evelina Children’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Robertson H, Kim HJ, Li J, Robertson N, Robertson P, Jimenez-Vera E, Ameen F, Tran A, Trinh K, O'Connell PJ, Yang JYH, Rogers NM, Patrick E. Decoding the hallmarks of allograft dysfunction with a comprehensive pan-organ transcriptomic atlas. Nat Med 2024:10.1038/s41591-024-03030-6. [PMID: 38890530 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03030-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
The pathogenesis of allograft (dys)function has been increasingly studied using 'omics'-based technologies, but the focus on individual organs has created knowledge gaps that neither unify nor distinguish pathological mechanisms across allografts. Here we present a comprehensive study of human pan-organ allograft dysfunction, analyzing 150 datasets with more than 12,000 samples across four commonly transplanted solid organs (heart, lung, liver and kidney, n = 1,160, 1,241, 1,216 and 8,853 samples, respectively) that we leveraged to explore transcriptomic differences among allograft dysfunction (delayed graft function, acute rejection and fibrosis), tolerance and stable graft function. We identified genes that correlated robustly with allograft dysfunction across heart, lung, liver and kidney transplantation. Furthermore, we developed a transfer learning omics prediction framework that, by borrowing information across organs, demonstrated superior classifications compared to models trained on single organs. These findings were validated using a single-center prospective kidney transplant cohort study (a collective 329 samples across two timepoints), providing insights supporting the potential clinical utility of our approach. Our study establishes the capacity for machine learning models to learn across organs and presents a transcriptomic transplant resource that can be employed to develop pan-organ biomarkers of allograft dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Robertson
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hani Jieun Kim
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Computational Systems Biology Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Kinghorn Cancer Centre and Cancer Research Theme, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer Li
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Robertson
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Paul Robertson
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elvira Jimenez-Vera
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Farhan Ameen
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andy Tran
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katie Trinh
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip J O'Connell
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jean Y H Yang
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Natasha M Rogers
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal and Transplantation Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ellis Patrick
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
- Sydney Precision Data Science Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
- Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited (D24H), Science Park, Hong Kong SAR, China.
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Masset C, Danger R, Degauque N, Dantal J, Giral M, Brouard S. Blood Gene Signature as a Biomarker for Subclinical Kidney Allograft Rejection: Where Are We? Transplantation 2024:00007890-990000000-00787. [PMID: 38867352 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000005105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
The observation decades ago that inflammatory injuries because of an alloimmune response might be present even in the absence of concomitant clinical impairment in allograft function conduced to the later definition of subclinical rejection. Many studies have investigated the different subclinical rejections defined according to the Banff classification (subclinical T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection), overall concluding that these episodes worsened long-term allograft function and survival. These observations led several transplant teams to perform systematic protocolar biopsies to anticipate treatment of rejection episodes and possibly prevent allograft loss. Paradoxically, the invasive characteristics and associated logistics of such procedures paved the way to investigate noninvasive biomarkers (urine and blood) of subclinical rejection. Among them, several research teams proposed a blood gene signature developed from cohort studies, most of which achieved excellent predictive values for the occurrence of subclinical rejection, mainly antibody-mediated rejection. Interestingly, although all identified genes relate to immune subsets and pathways involved in rejection pathophysiology, very few transcripts are shared among these sets of genes, highlighting the heterogenicity of such episodes and the difficult but mandatory need for external validation of such tools. Beyond this, their application and value in clinical practice remain to be definitively demonstrated in both biopsy avoidance and prevention of clinical rejection episodes. Their combination with other biomarkers, either epidemiological or biological, could contribute to a more accurate picture of a patient's risk of rejection and guide clinicians in the follow-up of kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Masset
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Richard Danger
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Degauque
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Jacques Dantal
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Helanterä I, Dörje C, Ortiz F, Varberg Reisæter A, Hammarström C, Lauronen J, Räisänen-Sokolowski A, Haugen AJ, Lempinen M, Åsberg A, Mjøen G. Very Low Frequency of Pathological Findings in One-year Protocol Biopsies of Uneventful Standard Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From the Nordic Protocol Biopsy Study. Transplant Direct 2024; 10:e1621. [PMID: 38617466 PMCID: PMC11013703 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The clinical significance of kidney transplant protocol biopsies has been debated. We studied the frequency of borderline changes and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in 1-y protocol biopsies in standard risk kidney transplant recipients. Methods Consecutive non-HLA-sensitized recipients of kidney transplants between 2006 and 2017, who underwent a protocol biopsy at 1 y in 2 national transplant centers were studied retrospectively (N = 1546). Donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs), graft function (plasma creatinine), and proteinuria were measured at the time of 1-y protocol biopsy. The occurrence of subclinical acute TCMR (i2t2v0 or higher) or borderline changes suspicious of TCMR (i1t1v0 or higher) in the protocol biopsy was studied, together with frequency of findings causing changes in the composite score iBox. Results Subclinical acute TCMR was detected in 30 of 1546 (1.9%) of the protocol biopsies, and borderline or TCMR in 179 of 1546 (12%). Among patients with no history of acute rejection, and no proteinuria or DSA, TCMR was detected in only 1 of 974 (0.1%) and borderline or TCMR in only 48 of 974 (4.9%) patients at 1 y. In the absence of proteinuria (<30 mg/g, or equivalent as measured with a negative dipstick proteinuria) or DSA, or history of acute rejection, only 50 of 974 (5.1%) biopsies showed any lesions significant for the iBox score. Conclusions The likelihood of pathological findings in 1-y protocol biopsies in non-HLA-sensitized patients without previous immunological events is low. Clinical usefulness of protocol biopsies seems limited in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilkka Helanterä
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christina Dörje
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fernanda Ortiz
- Department of Nephrology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Clara Hammarström
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski
- Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Marko Lempinen
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Mjøen
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goutaudier V, Sablik M, Racapé M, Rousseau O, Audry B, Kamar N, Raynaud M, Aubert O, Charreau B, Papuchon E, Danger R, Letertre L, Couzi L, Morelon E, Le Quintrec M, Taupin JL, Vicaut E, Legendre C, Le Mai H, Potluri V, Nguyen TVH, Azoury ME, Pinheiro A, Nouadje G, Sonigo P, Anglicheau D, Tieken I, Vogelaar S, Jacquelinet C, Reese P, Gourraud PA, Brouard S, Lefaucheur C, Loupy A. Design, cohort profile and comparison of the KTD-Innov study: a prospective multidimensional biomarker validation study in kidney allograft rejection. Eur J Epidemiol 2024; 39:549-564. [PMID: 38625480 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-024-01112-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
There is an unmet need for robust and clinically validated biomarkers of kidney allograft rejection. Here we present the KTD-Innov study (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03582436), an unselected deeply phenotyped cohort of kidney transplant recipients with a holistic approach to validate the clinical utility of precision diagnostic biomarkers. In 2018-2019, we prospectively enrolled consecutive adult patients who received a kidney allograft at seven French centers and followed them for a year. We performed multimodal phenotyping at follow-up visits, by collecting clinical, biological, immunological, and histological parameters, and analyzing a panel of 147 blood, urinary and kidney tissue biomarkers. The primary outcome was allograft rejection, assessed at each visit according to the international Banff 2019 classification. We evaluated the representativeness of participants by comparing them with patients from French, European, and American transplant programs transplanted during the same period. A total of 733 kidney transplant recipients (64.1% male and 35.9% female) were included during the study. The median follow-up after transplantation was 12.3 months (interquartile range, 11.9-13.1 months). The cumulative incidence of rejection was 9.7% at one year post-transplant. We developed a distributed and secured data repository in compliance with the general data protection regulation. We established a multimodal biomarker biobank of 16,736 samples, including 9331 blood, 4425 urinary and 2980 kidney tissue samples, managed and secured in a collaborative network involving 7 clinical centers, 4 analytical platforms and 2 industrial partners. Patients' characteristics, immune profiles and treatments closely resembled those of 41,238 French, European and American kidney transplant recipients. The KTD-Innov study is a unique holistic and multidimensional biomarker validation cohort of kidney transplant recipients representative of the real-world transplant population. Future findings from this cohort are likely to be robust and generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Goutaudier
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marta Sablik
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Maud Racapé
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Olivia Rousseau
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
- Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, Clinique des Données, INSERM, CIC 1413, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Benoit Audry
- Agence de la Biomédecine, Saint Denis la Plaine, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology-Dialysis-Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Marc Raynaud
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Béatrice Charreau
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Papuchon
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Richard Danger
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Laurence Letertre
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Transplantation, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, University Lyon, University of Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Medical Biology Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vicaut
- Clinical Trial Unit Hospital, Lariboisière Saint-Louis AP-HP, Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hoa Le Mai
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Vishnu Potluri
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thi-Van-Ha Nguyen
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm U1151, Necker Enfants-Malades Institute, Paris, France
| | - Ineke Tieken
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Serge Vogelaar
- Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Reese
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pierre-Antoine Gourraud
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
- Pôle Hospitalo-Universitaire 11: Santé Publique, Clinique des Données, INSERM, CIC 1413, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- INSERM UMR 1064, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, ITUN, Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration (PITOR), INSERM U970, Université Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015, Paris, France.
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Barrett-Chan E, Wang L, Bone J, Thachil A, Vytlingam K, Blydt-Hansen T. Optimizing the approach to monitoring allograft inflammation using serial urinary CXCL10/creatinine testing in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14718. [PMID: 38553815 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary CXCL10/creatinine (uCXCL10/Cr) is proposed as an effective biomarker of subclinical rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study objective was to model implementation in the clinical setting. METHODS Banked urine samples at a single center were tested for uCXCL10/Cr to validate published thresholds for rejection diagnosis (>80% specificity). The positive predictive value (PPV) for rejection diagnosis for uCXCL10/Cr-indicated biopsy was modeled with first-positive versus two-test-positive approaches, with accounting for changes associated with urinary tract infection (UTI), BK and CMV viremia, and subsequent recovery. RESULTS Seventy patients aged 10.5 ± 5.6 years at transplant (60% male) had n = 726 urine samples with n = 236 associated biopsies (no rejection = 167, borderline = 51, and Banff 1A = 18). A threshold of 12 ng/mmol was validated for Banff 1A versus no-rejection diagnosis (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.57-0.92). The first-positive test approach (n = 69) did not resolve a clinical diagnosis in 38 cases (55%), whereas the two-test approach resolved a clinical diagnosis in the majority as BK (n = 17/60, 28%), CMV (n = 4/60, 7%), UTI (n = 8/60, 13%), clinical rejection (n = 5/60, 8%), and transient elevation (n = 18, 30%). In those without a resolved clinical diagnosis, PPV from biopsy for subclinical rejection is 24% and 71% (p = .017), for first-test versus two-test models, respectively. After rejection treatment, uCXCL10/Cr level changes were all concordant with change in it-score. Sustained uCXCL10/Cr after CMV and BK viremia resolution was associated with later acute rejection. CONCLUSIONS Urinary CXCL10/Cr reliably identifies kidney allograft inflammation. These data support a two-test approach to reliably exclude other clinically identifiable sources of inflammation, for kidney biopsy indication to rule out subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Li Wang
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Bone
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Amy Thachil
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Vytlingam
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tom Blydt-Hansen
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Furian L, Bestard O, Budde K, Cozzi E, Diekmann F, Mamode N, Naesens M, Pengel LHM, Schwartz Sorensen S, Vistoli F, Thaunat O. European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12475. [PMID: 38665475 PMCID: PMC11043529 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Experimental Nephrology and Transplant Laboratory, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Liset H. M. Pengel
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Soren Schwartz Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Biothecnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hirt-Minkowski P, Schaub S. Urine CXCL10 as a biomarker in kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:138-143. [PMID: 38235748 PMCID: PMC10919271 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Urine CXCL10 is a promising biomarker for posttransplant renal allograft monitoring but is currently not widely used for clinical management. RECENT FINDINGS Large retrospective studies and data from a prospective randomized trial as well as a prospective cohort study demonstrate that low urine CXCL10 levels are associated with a low risk of rejection and can exclude BK polyomavirus replication with high certainty. Urine CXCL10 can either be used as part of a multiparameter based risk assessment tool, or as an individual biomarker taking relevant confounders into account. A novel Luminex-based CXCL10 assay has been validated in a multicenter study, and proved to be robust, reproducible, and accurate. SUMMARY Urine CXCL10 is a well characterized inflammation biomarker, which can be used to guide performance of surveillance biopsies. Wide implementation into clinical practice depends on the availability of inexpensive, thoroughly validated assays with approval from regulatory authorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology
- HLA-Diagnostic and lmmunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Streichart L, Felldin M, Ekberg J, Mjörnstedt L, Lindnér P, Lennerling A, Bröcker V, Mölne J, Holgersson J, Daenen K, Wennberg L, Lorant T, Baid-Agrawal S. Tocilizumab in chronic active antibody-mediated rejection: rationale and protocol of an in-progress randomized controlled open-label multi-center trial (INTERCEPT study). Trials 2024; 25:213. [PMID: 38519988 PMCID: PMC10958896 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08020-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (caAMR) in kidney transplants is associated with irreversible tissue damage and a leading cause of graft loss in the long-term. However, the treatment for caAMR remains a challenge to date. Recently, tocilizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the human interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor, has shown promise in the treatment of caAMR. However, it has not been systematically investigated so far underscoring the need for randomized controlled studies in this area. METHODS The INTERCEPT study is an investigator-driven randomized controlled open-label multi-center trial in kidney transplant recipients to assess the efficacy of tocilizumab in the treatment of biopsy-proven caAMR. A total of 50 recipients with biopsy-proven caAMR at least 12 months after transplantation will be randomized to receive either tocilizumab (n = 25) added to our standard of care (SOC) maintenance treatment or SOC alone (n = 25) for a period of 24 months. Patients will be followed for an additional 12 months after cessation of study medication. After the inclusion biopsies at baseline, protocol kidney graft biopsies will be performed at 12 and 24 months. The sample size calculation assumed a difference of 5 ml/year in slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between the two groups for 80% power at an alpha of 0.05. The primary endpoint is the slope of eGFR at 24 months after start of treatment. The secondary endpoints include assessment of the following at 12, 24, and 36 months: composite risk score iBox, safety, evolution and characteristics of donor-specific antibodies (DSA), graft histology, proteinuria, kidney function assessed by measured GFR (mGFR), patient- and death-censored graft survival, and patient-reported outcomes that include transplant-specific well-being, adherence to immunosuppressive medications and perceived threat of the risk of graft rejection. DISCUSSION No effective treatment exists for caAMR at present. Based on the hypothesis that inhibition of IL-6 receptor by tocilizumab will reduce antibody production and reduce antibody-mediated damage, our randomized trial has a potential to provide evidence for a novel treatment strategy for caAMR, therewith slowing the decline in graft function in the long-term. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04561986. Registered on September 24, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian Streichart
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marie Felldin
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jana Ekberg
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Mjörnstedt
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Lindnér
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annette Lennerling
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Verena Bröcker
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Mölne
- Department of Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jan Holgersson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg and Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristien Daenen
- Department of Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Wennberg
- Department of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tomas Lorant
- Section of Transplantation Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Seema Baid-Agrawal
- Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, 413 45, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shi QS, Jiang X, Li M, Fang J, Fu Z, Zhu S, Wu C, Meng Q, Jie T, Askar M. Microvascular activation and exocytosis after exposure to the serum from mismatched recipients by using donor microvascular cultures. Transpl Immunol 2024; 82:101963. [PMID: 38013122 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2023.101963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microvascular injury resulting from activation and exocytosis are early signs of tissue damage caused by allografting. However, humoral anti-graft reactions are not easily detectable in transplant biopsies. The aim of this study was to establish a bioassay to recapitulate this process in a prospective approach. METHODS The study was executed by using our previously established protocol to isolate and freeze the donors' microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) at the transplantation (34 living-related donors and 26 cadaver donors); and to collect sera from the recipients before the transplantation, one-, three- and six-months after transplantation. The activation and exocytosis of the MVEC were determined by incubating the donors' cultures with the recipients' sera. We determined if there was any endothelial activation by quantifying the releases of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in supernatants and the expressions of membrane intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD106) by flow cytometry. Endothelial exocytosis was determined by quantifying soluble E-selectin (CD62E) and cytoplasmic von Willebrand Factor (vWF) in supernatants. Endothelial activation or exocytosis was considered positive when the fold change (≧1.5) of post-transplantation to pre-transplantation was reached. We also monitored serum PRA and cytokines using Luminex multiple-plex and cytometric bead-based assay respectively. RESULTS We found 41.2% recipients (14 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 5.2 folds, p < 0.05) exhibited positive MVEC activation in the first month after transplantation as determined by IL-8 levels; 26.5% recipients (9 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 folds, p < 0.05) by MCP-1 levels. In the group of three months post-transplantation, 70.6% patients were positive (12 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 87.1 folds, p < 0.05) by IL-8 increased levels; 24% recipients (4 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 50.5 folds, p < 0.05) measured by MCP-1 levels. However, these changes disappeared six months after transplantation. Flow cytometric data showed that a time-dependent of CD54+ and CD106+ expressions existed over the course of six months. Most CD54+ and CD106+ cells were CD31- (platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1), though CD31+/CD106+ (37.5%, 3 out of 8) and CD31+/CD106+ (25%. 2 out of 8) were seen. When comparing donor MVEC activation to their recipient's proinflammatory cytokine levels or PRA status, we could not draw a conclusion regarding the connections between them. The sera collected from recipients at either one- or three-months after allografting did not significantly induce the release of either soluble CD62E or vWF (p > 0.05), indicating exocytosis was not significantly involved in the acute phase of allografting. CONCLUSIONS This bioassay enables us to detect the activation and exocytosis of donor MVEC elicited by respective sera from mismatched kidney recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Sebastian Shi
- Minnie & Max T. Voelcker Laboratory, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Bio-medicine, S1515 Room, 220 Dongting Road, TEDA, Tianjin, China; Minnie & Max T. Voelcker Laboratory (Suzhou), 1304 Room No. 1 Building, 399 Xiarong Street, Wujiang District, Suzhou, China.
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The Fifth Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, 33 Huanghe Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
| | - Ming Li
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The Fifth Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, 33 Huanghe Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Jun Fang
- Department of Organ Transplantation, The Fifth Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine, 33 Huanghe Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
| | - Zhiqiang Fu
- The Eco-City Hospital of Tianjin Fifth Central Hospital, 3333 He-Chang Road, Eco-City, Tianjin 300367, China
| | - Shengyi Zhu
- Minnie & Max T. Voelcker Laboratory (Suzhou), 1304 Room No. 1 Building, 399 Xiarong Street, Wujiang District, Suzhou, China.
| | - Chengyu Wu
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Central Texas Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
| | - Qianghe Meng
- Department of Surgery, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
| | - Tun Jie
- Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Central Texas Baylor Scott & White Health, 2401 South 31st Street, Temple, TX 76508, USA.
| | - Medhat Askar
- Transplant Immunology, Baylor University Medical Center, 3500 Gaston Ave, 4th Floor of the Y Wing, RM# L-0470, Dallas, TX 75246, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Landsberg A, Raza SS, Seifert ME, Blydt-Hansen TD. Follow-up biopsies identify high rates of persistent rejection in pediatric kidney transplant recipients after treatment of T cell-mediated rejection. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14617. [PMID: 37750353 PMCID: PMC10872996 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incomplete resolution of T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) after treatment may not be detected with serum creatinine monitoring and is associated with donor-specific antibodies and chronic rejection. We evaluate the utility of follow-up biopsies (FUB) to identify and characterize rates of persistent TCMR after treatment in pediatric kidney transplant patients. METHODS Patients from two pediatric transplant centers performing standard of care FUB at 1.5-2 months after treatment for TCMR were included. FUB were evaluated for extent of rejection resolution (complete vs. incomplete) and grade. Clinical data at time of FUB and later were reported, where available. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients underwent FUB, at mean of 1.7 months (SD 0.7) post-index biopsy. Rejection grade on index biopsy was Banff borderline (≥i1t1 and CONCLUSIONS FUB were effective at detecting persistent rejection, which was common among pediatric transplant patients after standard TCMR treatment. Until more effective rejection treatments or sensitive biomarkers are available, FUB may be effectively utilized to identify patients with ongoing rejection who would benefit from further treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adina Landsberg
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - S. Sikandar Raza
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Michael E. Seifert
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Tom D. Blydt-Hansen
- BC Children’s Hospital, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ruder T, Reddy NA, Zhang H, Zhou XJ, Curtis A, Madhrira MM, Reyad AI, Shekhtman G, Allam SR. "Pre-Histologic" Antibody-Mediated Rejection Detected by Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA and a Novel Tissue Gene Expression Assay: A Case Report. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:236-238. [PMID: 38171993 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its well-characterized association with poor long-term graft outcomes, subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in recipients of kidney transplants continues to pose a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Specifically, its detection currently relies on invasive histologic surveillance, a relatively uncommon practice among US transplant centers. We describe a subclinical, "pre-histologic" antibody-mediated rejection identified and characterized by a combination of novel molecular tools, donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), and molecular histology. CASE REPORT A 67-year-old kidney transplant recipient was found to have a marked elevation of dd-cfDNA on routine testing at 3 months post-transplant; other laboratory parameters were stable. A biopsy was performed, demonstrating the absence of rejection by traditional histology, but evidence of rejection was seen when tissue was evaluated using a research use molecular histology assay. Four months later, in the setting of persistently elevated dd-cfDNA, the patient developed graft dysfunction and was found to have C4d-negative ABMR, which was treated with improvement in both graft function and dd-cfDNA. CONCLUSION This case highlighted the complementary use of dd-cfDNA and molecular histology to aid in the early detection and characterization of graft injury. Hybrid approaches combining these tools may allow more expeditious therapeutic intervention, leading to improved graft and patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Ruder
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, California, United States
| | - Nikhil A Reddy
- HCA Healthcare Research Institute North Texas Division, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Hao Zhang
- CareDx Inc., Brisbane, California, United States
| | - Xin J Zhou
- Renal Path Diagnostics at PBM, Lewisville, Texas
| | - Anna Curtis
- Medical City Transplant Institute, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
| | | | - Ashraf I Reyad
- Medical City Transplant Institute, Fort Worth, Texas, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
López Del Moral C, Wu K, Naik M, Osmanodja B, Akifova A, Lachmann N, Stauch D, Hergovits S, Choi M, Bachmann F, Halleck F, Schrezenmeier E, Schmidt D, Budde K. Predictors of graft failure after first detection of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant recipients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023; 39:84-94. [PMID: 37410616 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND De novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSAs) may cause antibody-mediated rejection and graft dysfunction. Little is known about the clinical course after first detection of dnDSAs during screening in asymptomatic patients. We aimed to assess the value of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria to predict graft failure in patients with dnDSAs and their potential utility as surrogate endpoints. METHODS All 400 kidney transplant recipients with dnDSAs at our centre (1 March 2000-31 May 2021) were included in this retrospective study. The dates of graft loss, rejection, doubling of creatinine, ≥30% eGFR decline, proteinuria ≥500 mg/g and ≥1000 mg/g were registered from the first dnDSA appearance. RESULTS During 8.3 years of follow-up, graft failure occurred in 33.3% of patients. Baseline eGFR and proteinuria correlated with 5-year graft loss (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.75 and 0.80, P < .001). Creatinine doubled after a median of 2.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5-5.0] from dnDSA and the time from doubling creatinine to graft failure was 1.0 year (IQR 0.4-2.9). Analysing eGFR reduction ≥30% as a surrogate endpoint (148/400), the time from dnDSA to this event was 2.0 years (IQR 0.6-4.2), with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 45.9% to predict graft loss, which occurred after 2.0 years (IQR 0.8-3.2). The median time from proteinuria ≥500 mg/g and ≥1000 mg/g to graft failure was identical, 1.8 years, with a PPV of 43.8% and 49.0%, respectively. Composite endpoints did not improve PPV. Multivariable analysis showed that rejection was the most important independent risk factor for all renal endpoints and graft loss. CONCLUSIONS Renal function, proteinuria and rejection are strongly associated with graft failure in patients with dnDSA and may serve as surrogate endpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Covadonga López Del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Nephrology, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital-IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Kaiyin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Naik
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bilgin Osmanodja
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aylin Akifova
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, HLA-Laboratory, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Diana Stauch
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, HLA-Laboratory, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sabine Hergovits
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, HLA-Laboratory, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Mira Choi
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friederike Bachmann
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fabian Halleck
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Eva Schrezenmeier
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Academy, Berlin, Germany
| | - Danilo Schmidt
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wang Z, Xu Z, Yang X, Li M, Yip RCS, Li Y, Chen H. Current application and modification strategy of marine polysaccharides in tissue regeneration: A review. BIOMATERIALS ADVANCES 2023; 154:213580. [PMID: 37634336 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioadv.2023.213580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Marine polysaccharides (MPs) are exceptional bioactive materials that possess unique biochemical mechanisms and pharmacological stability, making them ideal for various tissue engineering applications. Certain MPs, including agarose, alginate, carrageenan, chitosan, and glucan have been successfully employed as biological scaffolds in animal studies. As carriers of signaling molecules, scaffolds can enhance the adhesion, growth, and differentiation of somatic cells, thereby significantly improving the tissue regeneration process. However, the biological benefits of pure MPs composite scaffold are limited. Therefore, physical, chemical, enzyme modification and other methods are employed to expand its efficacy. Chemically, the structural properties of MPs scaffolds can be altered through modifications to functional groups or molecular weight reduction, thereby enhancing their biological activities. Physically, MPs hydrogels and sponges emulate the natural extracellular matrix, creating a more conducive environment for tissue repair. The porosity and high permeability of MPs membranes and nanomaterials expedite wound healing. This review explores the distinctive properties and applications of select MPs in tissue regeneration, highlighting their structural versatility and biological applicability. Additionally, we provide a brief overview of common modification strategies employed for MP scaffolds. In conclusion, MPs have significant potential and are expected to be a novel regenerative material for tissue engineering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaokun Wang
- Marine College, Shandong University, NO. 180 Wenhua West Road, Gao Strict, Weihai 264209, China.
| | - Zhiwen Xu
- Marine College, Shandong University, NO. 180 Wenhua West Road, Gao Strict, Weihai 264209, China.
| | - Xuan Yang
- Marine College, Shandong University, NO. 180 Wenhua West Road, Gao Strict, Weihai 264209, China.
| | - Man Li
- Marine College, Shandong University, NO. 180 Wenhua West Road, Gao Strict, Weihai 264209, China.
| | - Ryan Chak Sang Yip
- Center for Nanomedicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Yuanyuan Li
- Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Stocking Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| | - Hao Chen
- Marine College, Shandong University, NO. 180 Wenhua West Road, Gao Strict, Weihai 264209, China; The Key Laboratory of Synthetic and Biological Colloids, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University, NO. 1800 Lihu Road, Wuxi 214122, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Heldal TF, Åsberg A, Ueland T, Reisæter AV, Pischke SE, Mollnes TE, Aukrust P, Reinholt F, Hartmann A, Heldal K, Jenssen TG. Systemic inflammation early after kidney transplantation is associated with long-term graft loss: a cohort study. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1253991. [PMID: 37849758 PMCID: PMC10577420 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1253991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Early graft loss following kidney transplantation is mainly a result of acute rejection or surgical complications, while long-term kidney allograft loss is more complex. We examined the association between systemic inflammation early after kidney transplantation and long-term graft loss, as well as correlations between systemic inflammation scores and inflammatory findings in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. Methods We measured 21 inflammatory biomarkers 10 weeks after transplantation in 699 patients who were transplanted between 2009 and 2012 at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway. Low-grade inflammation was assessed with predefined inflammation scores based on specific biomarkers: one overall inflammation score and five pathway-specific scores. Surveillance or indication biopsies were performed in all patients 6 weeks after transplantation. The scores were tested in Cox regression models. Results Median follow-up time was 9.1 years (interquartile range 7.6-10.7 years). During the study period, there were 84 (12.2%) death-censored graft losses. The overall inflammation score was associated with long-term kidney graft loss both when assessed as a continuous variable (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, P = 0.005) and as a categorical variable (4th quartile: hazard ratio 3.19, 95% CI 1.43-7.10, P = 0.005). In the pathway-specific analyses, fibrogenesis activity and vascular inflammation stood out. The vascular inflammation score was associated with inflammation in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after transplantation, while the fibrinogenesis score was associated with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Conclusion In conclusion, a systemic inflammatory environment early after kidney transplantation was associated with biopsy-confirmed kidney graft pathology and long-term kidney graft loss. The systemic vascular inflammation score correlated with inflammatory findings in biopsies 6 weeks and 1 year after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torbjørn F. Heldal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anders Åsberg
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Renal Registry, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thor Ueland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anna V. Reisæter
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Renal Registry, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Søren E. Pischke
- Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tom E. Mollnes
- Department of Immunology, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Laboratory, Nordland Hospital Bodø, Bodø, Norway
| | - Pål Aukrust
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- K.G. Jebsen Thrombosis Research and Expertise Center, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
- Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Section of Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Finn Reinholt
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anders Hartmann
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristian Heldal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Trond G. Jenssen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital – Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zaidan M, Lakkis FG. Tracking kidney transplant fitness. Science 2023; 381:1048-1049. [PMID: 37676961 DOI: 10.1126/science.adj9517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
An implantable bioelectronic device detects the early signs of kidney transplant rejection in rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Zaidan
- Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Fadi G Lakkis
- Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heilman RL, Fleming JN, Mai M, Smith B, Park WD, Holman J, Stegall MD. Multiple abnormal peripheral blood gene expression assay results are correlated with subsequent graft loss after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant 2023; 37:e14987. [PMID: 37026820 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to correlate peripheral blood gene expression profile (GEP) results during the first post-transplant year with outcomes after kidney transplantation. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multicenter observational study of obtaining peripheral blood at five timepoints during the first post-transplant year to perform a GEP assay. The cohort was stratified based on the pattern of the peripheral blood GEP results: Tx-all GEP results normal, 1 Not-TX had one GEP result abnormal and >1 Not-TX two or more abnormal GEP results. We correlated the GEP results with outcomes after transplantation. RESULTS We enrolled 240 kidney transplant recipients. The cohort was stratified into the three groups: TX n = 117 (47%), 1 Not-TX n = 59 (25%) and >1 Not-TX n = 64 (27%). Compared to the TX group, the >1 Not-TX group had lower eGFR (p < .001) and more chronic changes on 1-year surveillance biopsy (p = .007). Death censored graft survival showed inferior graft survival in the >1 Not-TX group (p < .001) but not in the 1 Not-TX group. All graft losses in the >1 Not-TX group occurred after 1-year post-transplant. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that a pattern of persistently Not-TX GEP assay correlates with inferior graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James N Fleming
- Medical Affairs, Transplant Genomics, Inc, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Martin Mai
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Byron Smith
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Walter D Park
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John Holman
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Mark D Stegall
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hirt-Minkowski P, Handschin J, Stampf S, Hopfer H, Menter T, Senn L, Hönger G, Wehmeier C, Amico P, Steiger J, Koller M, Dickenmann M, Schaub S. Randomized Trial to Assess the Clinical Utility of Renal Allograft Monitoring by Urine CXCL10 Chemokine. J Am Soc Nephrol 2023; 34:1456-1469. [PMID: 37228005 PMCID: PMC10400101 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study is the first randomized controlled trial to investigate the clinical utility of a noninvasive monitoring biomarker in renal transplantation. Although urine CXCL10 monitoring could not demonstrate a beneficial effect on 1-year outcomes, the study is a rich source for future design of trials aiming to explore the clinical utility of noninvasive biomarkers. In addition, the study supports the use of urine CXCL10 to assess the inflammatory status of the renal allograft. BACKGROUND Urine CXCL10 is a promising noninvasive biomarker for detection of renal allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of renal allograft monitoring by urine CXCL10 in a randomized trial. METHODS We stratified 241 patients, 120 into an intervention and 121 into a control arm. In both arms, urine CXCL10 levels were monitored at three specific time points (1, 3, and 6 months post-transplant). In the intervention arm, elevated values triggered performance of an allograft biopsy with therapeutic adaptations according to the result. In the control arm, urine CXCL10 was measured, but the results concealed. The primary outcome was a combined end point at 1-year post-transplant (death-censored graft loss, clinical rejection between month 1 and 1-year, acute rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, chronic active T-cell-mediated rejection in 1-year surveillance biopsy, development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies, or eGFR <25 ml/min). RESULTS The incidence of the primary outcome was not different between the intervention and the control arm (51% versus 49%; relative risk (RR), 1.04 [95% confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.34]; P = 0.80). When including 175 of 241 (73%) patients in a per-protocol analysis, the incidence of the primary outcome was also not different (55% versus 49%; RR, 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.47]; P = 0.54). The incidence of the individual end points was not different as well. CONCLUSIONS This study could not demonstrate a beneficial effect of urine CXCL10 monitoring on 1-year outcomes (ClinicalTrials.gov_ NCT03140514 ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Hirt-Minkowski
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Joelle Handschin
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Molecular Immune Regulation, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Susanne Stampf
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Helmut Hopfer
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Menter
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lisa Senn
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Gideon Hönger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Molecular Immune Regulation, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- HLA-Diagnostics and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Wehmeier
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Patrizia Amico
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jürg Steiger
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Molecular Immune Regulation, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Koller
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Dickenmann
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Schaub
- Clinic for Transplantation Immunology and Nephrology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Molecular Immune Regulation, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- HLA-Diagnostics and Immunogenetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
van den Broek DAJ, Meziyerh S, Budde K, Lefaucheur C, Cozzi E, Bertrand D, López del Moral C, Dorling A, Emonds MP, Naesens M, de Vries APJ. The Clinical Utility of Post-Transplant Monitoring of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients: A Consensus Report With Guideline Statements for Clinical Practice. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11321. [PMID: 37560072 PMCID: PMC10408721 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Solid phase immunoassays improved the detection and determination of the antigen-specificity of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The widespread use of SPI in kidney transplantation also introduced new clinical dilemmas, such as whether patients should be monitored for DSA pre- or post-transplantation. Pretransplant screening through SPI has become standard practice and DSA are readily determined in case of suspected rejection. However, DSA monitoring in recipients with stable graft function has not been universally established as standard of care. This may be related to uncertainty regarding the clinical utility of DSA monitoring as a screening tool. This consensus report aims to appraise the clinical utility of DSA monitoring in recipients without overt signs of graft dysfunction, using the Wilson & Junger criteria for assessing the validity of a screening practice. To assess the evidence on DSA monitoring, the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) convened a dedicated workgroup, comprised of experts in transplantation nephrology and immunology, to review relevant literature. Guidelines and statements were developed during a consensus conference by Delphi methodology that took place in person in November 2022 in Prague. The findings and recommendations of the workgroup on subclinical DSA monitoring are presented in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A. J. van den Broek
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Soufian Meziyerh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Transplant Immunology Unit, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Hemodialysis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Covadonga López del Moral
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Valdecilla Biomedical Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Leiden Transplant Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Couzi L, Malvezzi P, Amrouche L, Anglicheau D, Blancho G, Caillard S, Freist M, Guidicelli GL, Kamar N, Lefaucheur C, Mariat C, Koenig A, Noble J, Thaunat O, Thierry A, Taupin JL, Bertrand D. Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11244. [PMID: 37448448 PMCID: PMC10336835 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Couzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS-UMR 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Marine Freist
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux, Le Puy-en-Velay, France
| | | | - Nassim Kamar
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Christophe Mariat
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Johan Noble
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | - Antoine Thierry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ding X, Hu X, Zhang ZJ. Editorial: Recent advances on omics and biomarkers research in renal transplantation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1210249. [PMID: 37384045 PMCID: PMC10296761 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1210249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoming Ding
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Hospital of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaopeng Hu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Jenny Zhang
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Yamamoto I, Kawabe M, Hayashi A, Kobayashi A, Yamamoto H, Yokoo T. Challenges Posed by the Banff Classification: Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Active T-Cell-Mediated Rejection. Nephron Clin Pract 2023; 147 Suppl 1:74-79. [PMID: 36928337 DOI: 10.1159/000530158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The three primary sites of acute T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in transplanted kidneys are the tubular epithelial cells, interstitium, and the vascular endothelial cells. The pathology of acute lesions is characterized by inflammatory cell infiltration; the final diagnosis suggested by the Banff 2019 classification is guided by grading of tubulitis (the t score), interstitial inflammation (the i score), and endarteritis (the v score). Consistent major issues when using the Banff classification are the etiological classifications of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). From 2015 to 2019, technological advances (i.e., genetic analysis in paraffin sections) increased our understanding of IFTA status in patients with smoldering acute TCMR and the roles played by inflammatory cell infiltration (the i-IFTA score) and tubulitis (the t-IFTA score) in IFTA. These two scores were introduced when establishing the diagnostic criteria for chronic active TCMR. Despite the increase in complexity and the lack of a consensus treatment for chronic active TCMR, the Banff classification may evolve as new techniques (i.e., genetic analysis in paraffin sections and deep learning of renal pathology) are introduced. The Banff conference proceeded as follows. First, lesions were defined. Next, working groups were established to better understand the lesions and to derive better classification methods. Finally, the new Banff classification was developed. This approach will continue to evolve; the Banff classification will become a very useful diagnostic standard. This paper overviews the history of TCMR diagnosis using the Banff classification, and the clinical importance, treatment, and prospects for acute and chronic active TCMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izumi Yamamoto
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayuko Kawabe
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayaka Hayashi
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akimitsu Kobayashi
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Yamamoto
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Yokoo
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Danger R, Le Berre L, Cadoux M, Kerleau C, Papuchon E, Mai HL, Nguyen TVH, Guérif P, Morelon E, Thaunat O, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Lefaucheur C, Couzi L, Del Bello A, Kamar N, Le Quintrec M, Goutaudier V, Renaudin K, Giral M, Brouard S. Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression. Kidney Int 2023; 103:1167-1179. [PMID: 36990211 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
We previously established a six-gene-based blood score associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplantation which was decreased in patients developing anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Herein, we aimed to confirm that this score is associated with immunological events and risk of rejection. We measured this using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and NanoString methods from an independent multicenter cohort of 588 kidney transplant recipients with paired blood samples and biopsies at one year after transplantation validating its association with pre-existing and de novo DSA. From 441 patients with protocol biopsy, there was a significant decrease of the score of tolerance in 45 patients with biopsy-proven subclinical rejection (SCR), a major threat associated with pejorative allograft outcomes that prompted an SCR score refinement. This refinement used only two genes, AKR1C3 and TCL1A, and four clinical parameters (previous experience of rejection, previous transplantation, sex of recipient and tacrolimus uptake). This refined SCR score was able to identify patients unlikely to develop SCR with a C-statistic of 0.864 and a negative predictive value of 98.3%. The SCR score was validated in an external laboratory, with two methods (qPCR and NanoString), and on 447 patients from an independent and multicenter cohort. Moreover, this score allowed reclassifying patients with discrepancies between the DSA presence and the histological diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection unlike kidney function. Thus, our refined SCR score could improve detection of SCR for closer and noninvasive monitoring, allowing early treatment of SCR lesions notably for patients DSA-positive and during lowering of immunosuppressive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Danger
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France.
| | - Ludmilla Le Berre
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Marion Cadoux
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Clarisse Kerleau
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuelle Papuchon
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Hoa Le Mai
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Thi-Van-Ha Nguyen
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Pierrick Guérif
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon-Est Medical Faculty, Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, INSERM UMR S970, Université Paris Cité, Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis, and Apheresis, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Arnaud Del Bello
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM UMR1291 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, INSERM UMR1291 - Université Toulouse III, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital of Lapeyronie, Montpellier, France
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, INSERM, Paris University, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, INSERM U970, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Karine Renaudin
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; CHU Nantes, Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Nantes, France
| | - Magali Giral
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France; LabEx IGO "Immunotherapy, Graft, Oncology", Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Sophie Brouard
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (CR2TI), UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France; Centre d'Investigation Clinique en Biothérapie, Centre de Ressources Biologiques (CRB), CHU Nantes, Nantes, France; LabEx IGO "Immunotherapy, Graft, Oncology", Nantes Université, Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Moein M, Papa S, Ortiz N, Saidi R. Protocol Biopsy After Kidney Transplant: Clinical Application and Efficacy to Detect Allograft Rejection. Cureus 2023; 15:e34505. [PMID: 36874304 PMCID: PMC9983784 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney transplant rejection is a major cause of graft dysfunction and failure. In recent years, there has been increased interest in renal allograft protocol biopsies to allow earlier detection of acute or chronic graft dysfunction or rejection to improve long-term graft survival and reduce graft failure. This study aimed to determine if renal allograft protocol biopsies performed within the first 12 months after transplantation help detect subclinical graft dysfunction or rejection. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis utilizing SUNY Upstate University Hospital data from January 2016 to March 2022 to assess transplant outcomes and biopsies. The study population was divided into two subgroups: non-protocol biopsies and protocol biopsies within the 12 months post-transplant. Results A total of 332 patients met our inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients were divided into two subgroups: 135 patients (40.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 197 patients (59.4%) with non-protocol indication biopsies during the first year after the transplant. The overall number of rejection episodes reported was eight episodes (4.6%) in the protocol biopsy group and 56 episodes (18.3%) in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, which was significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.001). Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) diagnoses were significantly higher in the non-protocol biopsy group (P=0.03 and P=0.03, respectively). We also mentioned a trend in terms of mixed antibody-mediated rejection and T-cell-mediated rejection diagnosis (P=0.07). One year after the rejection, the mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 56.78 mL/min/1.73m2 in the protocol biopsy group and 49.14 mL/min/1.73m2 in the non-protocol indication biopsy group, and there was no significant difference anymore (P=0.11). The patient survival rate was not significantly higher in the protocol biopsy group compared to the non-protocol indication biopsy group (P=0.42). Conclusion This study suggests that performing protocol biopsies does not significantly benefit rejection rates, graft survival, or renal function within the first 12 months post-transplant. Given these results and the small but non-zero risk of complications associated with protocol biopsies, they should be reserved for those patients at high risk of rejection. It may be more feasible and beneficial to utilize less invasive tests, such as DSA and dd-cfDNA testing, for early diagnosis of a rejection episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoudreza Moein
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sarah Papa
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Noelle Ortiz
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Reza Saidi
- Transplantation Services, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bechtler C, Koutsogiannaki S, Umnyakova E, Hamid A, Gautam A, Sarigiannis Y, Pouw RB, Lamers C, Rabbani S, Schmidt CQ, Lambris JD, Ricklin D. Complement-regulatory biomaterial coatings: Activity and selectivity profile of the factor H-binding peptide 5C6. Acta Biomater 2023; 155:123-138. [PMID: 36328123 DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The use of biomaterials in modern medicine has enabled advanced drug delivery strategies and led to reduced morbidity and mortality in a variety of interventions such as transplantation or hemodialysis. However, immune-mediated reactions still present a serious complication of these applications. One of the drivers of such reactions is the complement system, a central part of humoral innate immunity that acts as a first-in-line defense system in its own right but also coordinates other host defense responses. A major regulator of the complement system is the abundant plasma protein factor H (FH), which impairs the amplification of complement responses. Previously, we could show that it is possible to recruit FH to biomedical surfaces using the phage display-derived cyclic peptide 5C6 and, consequently, reduce deposition of C3b, an activation product of the complement system. However, the optimal orientation of 5C6 on surfaces, structural determinants within the peptide for the binding, and the exact binding region on FH remained unknown. Here, we show that the cyclic core and C-terminal region of 5C6 are essential for its interaction with FH and that coating through its N-terminus strongly increases FH recruitment and reduces C3-mediated opsonization in a microparticle-based assay. Furthermore, we could demonstrate that 5C6 selectively binds to FH but not to related proteins. The observation that 5C6 also binds murine FH raises the potential for translational evaluation in animal models. This work provides important insight for the future development of 5C6 as a probe or therapeutic entity to reduce complement activation on biomaterials. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Biomaterials have evolved into core technologies critical to biomedical and drug delivery applications alike, yet their safe and efficient use may be adversely impacted by immune responses to the foreign materials. Taking inspiration from microbial immune evasion strategies, our group developed a peptide-based surface coating that recruits factor H (FH), a host regulator of the complement system, from plasma to the material surface and prevents unwanted activation of this innate immunity pathway. In this study, we identified the molecular determinants that define the interaction between FH and the coated peptide, developed tethering strategies with largely enhanced binding capacity and provided important insight into the target selectivity and species specificity of the FH-binding peptide, thereby paving the way for preclinical development steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Bechtler
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sophia Koutsogiannaki
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 422 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ekaterina Umnyakova
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Amal Hamid
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Avneesh Gautam
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 422 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Yiannis Sarigiannis
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 422 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Richard B Pouw
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christina Lamers
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Said Rabbani
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Q Schmidt
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacology of Natural Products, University of Ulm Medical Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - John D Lambris
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 422 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| | - Daniel Ricklin
- Molecular Pharmacy Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Huang E, Haas M, Gillespie M, Sethi S, Peng A, Najjar R, Vo A, Jordan SC. An Assessment of the Value of Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Surveillance in Patients With Preserved Kidney Allograft Function. Transplantation 2023; 107:274-282. [PMID: 35913057 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a biomarker validated to detect rejection when measured to assess kidney allograft dysfunction. However, it remains unclear whether routine surveillance with dd-cfDNA provides additional information over standard monitoring of kidney allografts with creatinine and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), particularly among those with little suspicion of rejection or injury. We investigated the value of measuring dd-cfDNA in patients with preserved allograft function and describe its association with future events. METHODS Three-hundred seventeen kidney transplant recipients with a creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL, no current DSA, and no prior rejection were assessed with dd-cfDNA and categorized into low (dd-cfDNA <0.5%; n = 239), moderate (dd-cfDNA 0.5% to <1.0%; n = 43), and high (dd-cfDNA ≥1.0%; n = 35) groups. The occurrence of rejection, DSA, graft loss, and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate over time after dd-cfDNA assessment was compared. RESULTS Over follow-up, rejections were more commonly found among patients with high vs low dd-cfDNA (17% versus 5%; P = 0.01); a similar nonsignificant trend was observed among patients with moderate compared to low dd-cfDNA (12% versus 5%; P = 0.13). DSA development was uncommon and not different between groups (low: 4%; moderate: 3%; high: 0%; P = 0.52). There was only 1 graft loss in a patient with low dd-cfDNA, and dd-cfDNA was not associated with graft dysfunction over time. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with elevated dd-cfDNA in conjunction with preserved allograft function remained stable over follow-up without deterioration in function or graft loss. Studies are needed to differentiate patients with elevated dd-cfDNA who will develop adverse outcomes from those who will remain clinically stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Matt Gillespie
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Supreet Sethi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alice Peng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Reiad Najjar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ashley Vo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Stanley C Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang Z, Qin Y, Wang Y, Li S, Hu X. Integrated analysis of cell-specific gene expression in peripheral blood using ISG15 as a marker of rejection in kidney transplantation. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1153940. [PMID: 36969159 PMCID: PMC10030514 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1153940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Allograft kidney rejection can lead to graft dysfunction and graft loss. Protocol biopsy poses additional risk for recipients with normal renal function. The transcriptome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) contains tremendous information and has potential application value for non-invasive diagnosis. Methods From the Gene Expression Omnibus database, we collected three datasets containing 109 rejected samples and 215 normal controls. After data filter and normalization, we performed deconvolution of bulk RNA sequencing data to predict cell type and cell-type specific gene expression. Subsequently, we calculated cell communication analysis by Tensor-cell2cell and conducted the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression to screen the robust differentially expressed genes (DEGs). These gene expression levels were validated in mice kidney transplantation acute rejection model. The function of the novel gene ISG15 in monocytes was further confirmed by gene knockdown and lymphocyte-stimulated assay. Results The bulk RNA-seq hardly predicted kidney transplant rejection accurately. Seven types of immune cells and transcriptomic characteristics were predicted from the gene expression data. The monocytes showed significant differences in amount and gene expression of rejection. The cell-to-cell communication indicated the enrichment of antigen presentation and T cell activation ligand-receptor pairs. Then 10 robust genes were found by Lasso regression and a novel gene ISG15 remained differential expression in monocytes between rejection samples and normal control both in public data and animal model. Furthermore, ISG15 also showed a critical role in promoting the proliferation of T cells. Conclusion This study identified and validated a novel gene ISG15 associated with rejection in peripheral blood after kidney transplantation, which is a significant non-invasive diagnosis and a potential therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zijian Zhang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Qin
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yicun Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaopeng Hu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Xiaopeng Hu,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Updated management for antibody-mediated rejection: opportunity to prolong kidney allograft survival. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2023; 32:13-19. [PMID: 36250450 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is an important barrier to achieve long-term kidney allograft survival. Human leukocyte antibody (HLA)-incompatibility and ABO-incompatibility are the two main mechanisms of ABMR. Nevertheless, the advances in managing ABMR have changed the paradigm for kidney transplantation. This review aimed to emphasize the HLA-incompatibility and ABO-incompatibility kidney transplant and update the management of ABMR. RECENT FINDINGS HLA-incompatibility kidney transplantation is a strong risk factor for ABMR. Donor-specific antibody (DSA) is a surrogate biomarker that prevents long-term allograft survival. The standard treatment for ABMR has unfavorable results. New drugs that target the B cell are a promising approach to treat ABMR. In the past, ABO-incompatibility kidney donor was an absolute contraindication but now, it is widely accepted as an alternative organ resource. The advancement of ABO antibody removal and B-cell depletion therapy has been successfully developed. ABO isoagglutination remains the main biomarker for monitoring ABMR during the transplantation process. C4d staining without inflammation of the kidney allograft is the marker for the accommodation process. SUMMARY With the shortage of organ donors, transplant experts have expanded the organ resources and learned how to overcome the immunological barriers by using novel biomarkers and developing new treatments that support long-term graft survival.
Collapse
|
35
|
Kolonko A, Dwulit T, Skrzypek M, Więcek A. Potential Utility of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte, and Neutrophil, Lymphocyte, and Platelet Ratios in Differential Diagnosis of Kidney Transplant Acute Rejection: A Retrospective, Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Ann Transplant 2022; 27:e937239. [PMID: 36536590 PMCID: PMC9789674 DOI: 10.12659/aot.937239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute kidney transplant rejection can negatively affect long-term graft function. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio have been proposed as non-invasive predictors of acute rejection in stable kidney transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to validate the predictive value of these ratios, as well as neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet ratios in the diagnosis of acute rejection during the early post-transplant period. MATERIAL AND METHODS After propensity score matching, we compared 71 kidney recipients with biopsy-proven acute rejection with 71 patients without rejection and also subjects with different histologic types of rejection. All 3 types of blood cell count-derived ratios were calculated 6 and 3 days prior to biopsy and on the day of biopsy. RESULTS There were 15 patients with T cell-mediated rejection, 33 with vascular rejection, and 23 with antibody-mediated rejection. The values of all examined ratios did not differ between subgroups with and without rejection. However, at all post-transplant study time-points, patients with antibody-mediated rejection had significantly higher values of all analyzed ratios than subjects with other types of rejection. In multivariate regression models, higher values of blood cell count-derived ratios were independently associated with the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection. CONCLUSIONS In the early post-transplant period, the values of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, platelet-to-lymphocyte, and neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet ratios were similar in patients with and without an acute rejection episode, but significantly higher values were found in subjects with antibody-mediated rejection as compared with other types of rejection and those without rejection. High values of analyzed ratios in patients with satisfactory early kidney graft function may be helpful in selecting subjects with increased risk of subclinical antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliusz Kolonko
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Tomasz Dwulit
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Michał Skrzypek
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland
| | - Andrzej Więcek
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The Histological Spectrum and Clinical Significance of T Cell-mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts. Transplantation 2022; 107:1042-1055. [PMID: 36584369 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) remains a significant cause of long-term kidney allograft loss, either indirectly through induction of donor-specific anti-HLA alloantibodies or directly through chronic active TCMR. Whether found by indication or protocol biopsy, Banff defined acute TCMR should be treated with antirejection therapy and maximized maintenance immunosuppression. Neither isolated interstitial inflammation in the absence of tubulitis nor isolated tubulitis in the absence of interstitial inflammation results in adverse outcomes, and neither requires antirejection treatment. RNA gene expression analysis of biopsy material may supplement conventional histology, especially in ambiguous cases. Lesser degrees of tubular and interstitial inflammation (Banff borderline) may portend adverse outcomes and should be treated when found on an indication biopsy. Borderline lesions on protocol biopsies may resolve spontaneously but require close follow-up if untreated. Following antirejection therapy of acute TCMR, surveillance protocol biopsies should be considered. Minimally invasive blood-borne assays (donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene expression profiling) are being increasingly studied as a means of following stable patients in lieu of biopsy. The clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness require confirmation in randomized controlled trials. Treatment of acute TCMR is not standardized but involves bolus corticosteroids with lymphocyte depleting antibodies for severe, refractory, or relapsing cases. Arteritis may be found with acute TCMR, active antibody-mediated rejection, or mixed rejections and should be treated accordingly. The optimal treatment ofchronic active TCMR is uncertain. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to optimally define therapy.
Collapse
|
37
|
Senev A, Van Loon E, Lerut E, Coemans M, Callemeyn J, Daniëls L, Kerkhofs J, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Lamarthée B, Sprangers B, Tinel C, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Van Sandt V, Emonds MP, Naesens M. Association of Predicted HLA T-Cell Epitope Targets and T-Cell-Mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80:718-729.e1. [PMID: 35690154 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE The relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatches and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is unknown. We investigated the associations between the different donor HLA-derived T-cell targets and the occurrence of TCMR and borderline histologic changes suggestive of TCMR after kidney transplantation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS All kidney transplant recipients at a single center between 2004 and 2013 with available biopsy data and a DNA sample for high-resolution HLA donor/recipient typing (N = 893). EXPOSURE Scores calculated by the HLA matching algorithm PIRCHE-II and HLA eplet mismatches. OUTCOME TCMR, borderline changes suggestive of TCMR, and allograft failure. ANALYTICAL APPROACH Multivariable cause-specific hazards models were fit to characterize the association between HLA epitopes targets and study outcomes. RESULTS We found 277 patients developed TCMR, and 134 developed only borderline changes suggestive of TCMR on at least 1 biopsy. In multivariable analyses, only the PIRCHE-II scores for HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 were independently associated with the occurrence of TCMR and with allograft failure; this was not the case for HLA class I molecules. If restricted to rejection episodes within the first 3 months after transplantation, only the T-cell epitope targets originating from the donor's HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1, but not class I molecules, were associated with the early acute TCMR. Also, the median PIRCHE-II score for HLA class II was statistically different between the patients with TCMR compared to the patients without TCMR (129 [IQR, 60-240] vs 201 [IQR, 96-298], respectively; P < 0.0001). These differences were not observed for class I PIRCHE-II scores. LIMITATIONS Observational clinical data and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS In the absence of HLA-DSA, HLA class II but not class I mismatches are associated with early episodes of acute TCMR and allograft failure. This suggests that current immunosuppressive therapies are largely able to abort the most deleterious HLA class I-directed alloimmune processes; however, alloresponses against HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 molecular mismatches remain insufficiently suppressed. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY Genetic differences in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) complex between kidney transplant donors and recipients play a central role in T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), which can lead to failure of the transplanted kidney. Evaluating this genetic disparity (mismatch) in the HLA complex at the molecular (epitope) level could contribute to better prediction of the immune response to the donor organ posttransplantation. We investigated the associations of the different donor HLA-derived T-cell epitope targets and scores obtained from virtual crossmatch algorithms with the occurrence of TCMR, borderline TCMR, and graft failure after kidney transplantation after taking into account the influence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. This study illustrates the greater importance of the molecular mismatches in class II molecules compared to class I HLA molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Senev
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Elisabet Van Loon
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyne Lerut
- Department of Imaging & Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth Daniëls
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Johan Kerkhofs
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Priyanka Koshy
- Department of Imaging & Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baptiste Lamarthée
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Claire Tinel
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vicky Van Sandt
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory (HILA), Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- KU Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven University, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mehta RB, Melgarejo I, Viswanathan V, Zhang X, Pittappilly M, Randhawa P, Puttarajappa C, Sood P, Wu C, Sharma A, Molinari M, Hariharan S. Long-term immunological outcomes of early subclinical inflammation on surveillance kidney allograft biopsies. Kidney Int 2022; 102:1371-1381. [PMID: 36049641 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The long-term impact of early subclinical inflammation (SCI) through surveillance biopsy has not been well studied. To do this, we recruited a prospective observational cohort that included 1000 sequential patients who received a kidney transplant from 2013-2017 at our center. A total of 586 patients who underwent a surveillance biopsy in their first year post-transplant were included after excluding those with clinical rejections, and those who were unable to undergo a surveillance biopsy. Patients were classified based on their biopsy findings: 282 with NSI (No Significant Inflammation) and 304 with SCI-T (SCI and Tubulitis) which was further subdivided into 182 with SC-BLR (Subclinical Borderline Changes) and 122 with SC-TCMR (Subclinical T Cell Mediated Rejection, Banff 2019 classification of 1A or more). We followed the clinical and immunological events including Clinical Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection [C-BPAR], long-term kidney function and death-censored graft loss over a median follow-up of five years. Episodes of C-BPAR were noted at a median of two years post-transplant. Adjusted odds of having a subsequent C-BPAR was significantly higher in the SCI-T group [SC-BLR and SC-TCMR] compared to NSI 3.8 (2.1-7.5). The adjusted hazard for death-censored graft loss was significantly higher with SCI-T compared to NSI [1.99 (1.04-3.84)]. Overall, SCI detected through surveillance biopsy within the first year post-transplant is a harbinger for subsequent immunological events and is associated with a significantly greater hazard for subsequent C-BPAR and death-censored graft loss. Thus, our study highlights the need for identifying patients with SCI through surveillance biopsy and develop strategies to prevent further alloimmune injuries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajil B Mehta
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Ivy Melgarejo
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Vignesh Viswanathan
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Xingyu Zhang
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Pittappilly
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chethan Puttarajappa
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Puneet Sood
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christine Wu
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Akhil Sharma
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Division of Transplant Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kervella D, Le Bas-Bernardet S, Bruneau S, Blancho G. Protection of transplants against antibody-mediated injuries: from xenotransplantation to allogeneic transplantation, mechanisms and therapeutic insights. Front Immunol 2022; 13:932242. [PMID: 35990687 PMCID: PMC9389360 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.932242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Long-term allograft survival in allotransplantation, especially in kidney and heart transplantation, is mainly limited by the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection due to anti-Human Leukocyte Antigen antibodies. These types of rejection are difficult to handle and chronic endothelial damages are often irreversible. In the settings of ABO-incompatible transplantation and xenotransplantation, the presence of antibodies targeting graft antigens is not always associated with rejection. This resistance to antibodies toxicity seems to associate changes in endothelial cells phenotype and modification of the immune response. We describe here these mechanisms with a special focus on endothelial cells resistance to antibodies. Endothelial protection against anti-HLA antibodies has been described in vitro and in animal models, but do not seem to be a common feature in immunized allograft recipients. Complement regulation and anti-apoptotic molecules expression appear to be common features in all these settings. Lastly, pharmacological interventions that may promote endothelial cell protection against donor specific antibodies will be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Kervella
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphanie Le Bas-Bernardet
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Sarah Bruneau
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- CHU Nantes, Nantes Université, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Institut Transplantation Urologie Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France
- Nantes Université, CHU Nantes, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, ITUN, Nantes, France
- *Correspondence: Gilles Blancho,
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Anwar IJ, Srinivas TR, Gao Q, Knechtle SJ. Shifting Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation: The Rise of Composite Endpoints and Machine Learning to Refine Prognostication. Transplantation 2022; 106:1558-1564. [PMID: 35323161 PMCID: PMC10900533 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The measurement of outcomes in kidney transplantation has been more accurately documented than almost any other surgical procedure result in recent decades. With significant improvements in short- and long-term outcomes related to optimized immunosuppression, outcomes have gradually shifted away from conventional clinical endpoints (ie, patient and graft survival) to surrogate and composite endpoints. This article reviews how outcomes measurements have evolved in the past 2 decades in the setting of increased data collection and summarizes recent advances in outcomes measurements pertaining to clinical, histopathological, and immune outcomes. Finally, we discuss the use of composite endpoints and Bayesian concepts, specifically focusing on the integrative box risk prediction score, in conjunction with machine learning to refine prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imran J Anwar
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - Qimeng Gao
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Stuart J Knechtle
- Department of Surgery, Duke Transplant Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yilmaz VT, Dandin O, Kisaoglu A, Avanaz A, Kamaci D, Toru HS, Demiryilmaz I, Koksoy S, Aydinli B, Kocak H. Prognosis and Treatment for Active and Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients; Single Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1809-1815. [PMID: 35907695 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.03.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment alternatives of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal transplant patients. METHODS Three thousand renal transplant patients were included in the study. The patients were first divided into 2 groups. Group 1: ABMR [-] recipients (n = 2871), Group 2: ABMR (+) recipients (n = 129). ABMR patients were compared among themselves by dividing them into 3 subgroups (early-active, late-active, chronic-active). The study was performed retrospectively. Different combinations of methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, plasmapheresis (PP), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) were used in the treatment and the results were compared. RESULTS Graft survival and functions were worse and the rates of CAD, delayed graft function, BK virus, and cytomegalovirus higher in patients with ABMR. Also, graft survival was lower in patients with serum creatinine ≥3 (P = 0.001), GFR <30 (P <0.001), and spot urine protein to creatinine ratio ≥1 (P = 0.042) at the time of diagnosis. High interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores in chronic ABMR cases and high intimal arteritis scores in active ABMR cases were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that ABMR has a poor prognosis in terms of clinical parameters, and treatment should be individualized according to pathologic findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. Pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG should be used in the treatment of all ABMR patients, but PP, rituximab, and ATG should be used in selected cases. ABMR has a poor prognosis and treatment should be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vural Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey.
| | - Ozgur Dandin
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Abdullah Kisaoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ali Avanaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Davut Kamaci
- Department of Urology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Havva Serap Toru
- Department of Pathology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Ismail Demiryilmaz
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Sadi Koksoy
- Department of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Bulent Aydinli
- Department of General Surgery, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Kocak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Akdeniz University Medical School, Antalya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Anwar IJ, DeLaura IF, Gao Q, Ladowski J, Jackson AM, Kwun J, Knechtle SJ. Harnessing the B Cell Response in Kidney Transplantation - Current State and Future Directions. Front Immunol 2022; 13:903068. [PMID: 35757745 PMCID: PMC9223638 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite dramatic improvement in kidney transplantation outcomes over the last decades due to advent of modern immunosuppressive agents, long-term outcomes remain poor. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), a B cell driven process, accounts for the majority of chronic graft failures. There are currently no FDA-approved regimens for ABMR; however, several clinical trials are currently on-going. In this review, we present current mechanisms of B cell response in kidney transplantation, the clinical impact of sensitization and ABMR, the B cell response under current immunosuppressive regimens, and ongoing clinical trials for ABMR and desensitization treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Stuart J. Knechtle
- Duke Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Roufosse C, Becker JU, Rabant M, Seron D, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Diekmann F, Glotz D, Hilbrands L, Loupy A, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, Naesens M. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10140. [PMID: 35669973 PMCID: PMC9163810 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Ulrich Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Seron
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Naesens M, Budde K, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Bellini MI, Glotz D, Grinyó J, Heemann U, Jochmans I, Pengel L, Reinders M, Schneeberger S, Loupy A. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10136. [PMID: 35669974 PMCID: PMC9163814 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
In kidney transplant recipients, late graft failure is often multifactorial. In addition, primary endpoints in kidney transplantation studies seek to demonstrate the short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Although such endpoints might demonstrate short-term improvement in specific aspects of graft function or incidence of rejection, such findings do not automatically translate into meaningful long-term graft survival benefits. Combining many factors into a well-validated model is therefore more likely to predict long-term outcome and better reflect the complexity of late graft failure than using single endpoints. If conditional marketing authorization could be considered for therapies that aim to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation, then the surrogate endpoint for graft failure in clinical trial settings needs clearer definition. This Consensus Report considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of several candidate surrogate endpoints (including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, histological lesions, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies) and composite scoring systems. The content was created from information prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The group submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), June 2020: the request focused on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. Following discussion and refinement, the EMA made final recommendations to ESOT in December 2020 regarding the potential to use surrogate endpoints in clinical studies that aim to improving late graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Uwe Heemann
- Department of Nephrology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ina Jochmans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marlies Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Seron D, Rabant M, Becker JU, Roufosse C, Bellini MI, Böhmig GA, Budde K, Diekmann F, Glotz D, Hilbrands L, Loupy A, Oberbauer R, Pengel L, Schneeberger S, Naesens M. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10135. [PMID: 35669975 PMCID: PMC9163314 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability—and ambiguity—in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Seron
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Necker–Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | - Jan Ulrich Becker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Georg A. Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Luuk Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France
| | - Rainer Oberbauer
- Department of Nephrology and Dialysis, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stefan Schneeberger
- Department of General, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Maarten Naesens,
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Van Loon E, Lamarthée B, Barba T, Claes S, Coemans M, de Loor H, Emonds MP, Koshy P, Kuypers D, Proost P, Senev A, Sprangers B, Tinel C, Thaunat O, Van Craenenbroeck AH, Schols D, Naesens M. Circulating Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies Associate With Immune Activation Independent of Kidney Transplant Histopathological Findings. Front Immunol 2022; 13:818569. [PMID: 35281018 PMCID: PMC8904423 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.818569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the critical role of cytokines in allograft rejection, the relation of peripheral blood cytokine profiles to clinical kidney transplant rejection has not been fully elucidated. We assessed 28 cytokines through multiplex assay in 293 blood samples from kidney transplant recipients at time of graft dysfunction. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified a subset of patients with increased pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. This patient subset was hallmarked by a high prevalence (75%) of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (HLA-DSA) and histological rejection (70%) and had worse graft survival compared to the group with low cytokine levels (HLA-DSA in 1.7% and rejection in 33.7%). Thirty percent of patients with high pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and HLA-DSA did not have histological rejection. Exploring the cellular origin of these cytokines, we found a corresponding expression in endothelial cells, monocytes, and natural killer cells in single-cell RNASeq data from kidney transplant biopsies. Finally, we confirmed secretion of these cytokines in HLA-DSA-mediated cross talk between endothelial cells, NK cells, and monocytes. In conclusion, blood pro-inflammatory cytokines are increased in kidney transplant patients with HLA-DSA, even in the absence of histology of rejection. These observations challenge the concept that histology is the gold standard for identification of ongoing allo-immune activation after transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabet Van Loon
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Baptiste Lamarthée
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Barba
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Sandra Claes
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Coemans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Henriette de Loor
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Paule Emonds
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Priyanka Koshy
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul Proost
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aleksandar Senev
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Red Cross-Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Ben Sprangers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute for Medical Research, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Claire Tinel
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital Lyon, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Amaryllis H Van Craenenbroeck
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Dominique Schols
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation Research Group, Katholieke Universiteit (KU) Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sharma A, Jorgensen DR, Mehta RB, Sood P, Puttarajappa CM, Wu CM, Tevar AD, Molinari M, Zeevi A, Hariharan S. The Clinical Impact of Anti-HLA Donor Specific Antibody Detection Through First Year Screening on Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10094. [PMID: 35368641 PMCID: PMC8967948 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Anti-HLA Donor Specific Antibody (DSA) detection post kidney transplant has been associated with adverse outcomes, though the impact of early DSA screening on stable patients remain unclear. We analyzed impact of DSA detection through screening in 1st year stable patients (n = 736) on subsequent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), death censored graft survival (DCGS), and graft failure (graft loss including return to dialysis or re-transplant, patient death, or eGFR < 20 ml/min at last follow up). Patients were grouped using 1st year screening into DSA+ (Class I, II; n = 131) or DSA- (n = 605). DSA+ group were more DR mismatched (p = 0.02), more sensitized (cPRA ≥90%, p = 0.002), less Caucasian (p = 0.04), and had less pre-emptive (p = 0.04) and more deceased donor transplants (p = 0.03). DSA+ patients had similar eGFR (54.8 vs. 53.8 ml/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.56), DCGS (91% vs. 94%, p = 0.30), and graft failure free survival (76% vs. 82%, p = 0.11). DSA timing and type did not impact survival. Among those with a protocol biopsy (n = 515), DSA detected on 1st year screening was a predictor for graft failure on multivariate analysis (1.91, 95% CI 1.03-3.55, p = 0.04). Overall, early DSA detection in stable patients was an independent risk factor for graft failure, though only among those who underwent a protocol biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akhil Sharma
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Dana R Jorgensen
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Rajil B Mehta
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Puneet Sood
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Chethan M Puttarajappa
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Christine M Wu
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Amit D Tevar
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Michele Molinari
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Adriana Zeevi
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.,Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Sundaram Hariharan
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.,Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Clinical characteristics of renal transplant recipients who developed de novo donor-specific antigen in Kyoto University Hospital: a case series. RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s41100-022-00401-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The clinical significance of de novo donor-specific antigen (DSA) in renal transplant recipients is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to report the prevalence of de novo DSA detected in antihuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody testing and to evaluate the association between de novo DSA and renal transplant prognosis in living-donor renal transplant recipients at our hospital.
Methods
Of the 110 patients who underwent living-donor renal transplantation from 1980 to 2019, 80 patients who underwent anti-HLA antibody screening tests were retrospectively reviewed for the development of de novo DSA and outcomes regarding graft function.
Results
The mean age at transplantation was 43.2 ± 14.6 years. Of the 80 patients, 43 (53.8%) were men and 68 (85.0%) underwent ABO-compatible transplantation. Anti-HLA antibody was detected in 14 patients (17.5%), including eight (10.0%) with de novo DSA. Graft loss occurred in two (25%) of the eight patients with de novo DSA, none of the six patients with non-DSA anti-HLA antibody and no anti-HLA antibody (P = 0.0419, log-rank test). The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of the anti-HLA antibody test was 45.1 ± 14.4 mL/min/1.73m2 in the 66 patients with no anti-HLA antibody, while it was 35.0 ± 11.5 mL/min/1.73m2 in the eight patients with de novo DSA (P = 0.0702) and 39.3 ± 15.3 mL/min/1.73m2 in the six patients with non-DSA anti-HLA antibody (P = 0.3921). The mean monthly cyclosporin A trough concentration for the past year from the anti-HLA antibody test was 59.2 ± 24.8 ng/ml in the seven patients with no anti-HLA antibody, while it was 61.9 ± 12.5 ng/ml in the five patients with de novo DSA (P = 0.5670) and 36.3 ± 9.0 ng/ml in a patient with non-DSA anti-HLA antibody (P = 0.3921). The mean monthly tacrolimus trough concentration for the past year from the anti-HLA antibody test was 4.62 ± 1.20 ng/ml in the 55 patients with no anti-HLA antibody, while it was 4.09 ± 1.10 ng/ml in the three patients with de novo DSA (P = 0.0027) and 4.21 ± 1.14 ng/ml in the four patients with non-DSA anti-HLA antibody (P = 0.0722).
Conclusions
The optimal treatment for patients with de novo DSA has not been established, and immunosuppressive management that suppresses the development of de novo DSA is essential.
Collapse
|
49
|
Lum EL, Lee S, Zuckerman J, Bunnapradist S. Subclinical non-HLA AMR detection and monitoring with surveillance dd-cfDNA in a kidney transplant recipient. TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tpr.2022.100092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
50
|
Nasic S, Mölne J, Stegmayr B, Peters B. Histological diagnosis from kidney transplant biopsy can contribute to prediction of graft survival. Nephrology (Carlton) 2022; 27:528-536. [PMID: 35150598 PMCID: PMC9302625 DOI: 10.1111/nep.14028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Aim The primary aim of this study was to in depth examine if the histological findings in a transplanted kidney biopsy can predict the prognosis for the graft and the patient. The secondary aim was to extend knowledge of the impact of time elapsed on biopsy findings. Methods Data from 1462 patients were merged from a kidney transplantation registry and a biopsy registry during 1 January 2007 and 30 September 2017. Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariate Cox‐regression analysis were performed and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented. Results Compared to normal biopsy findings, graft survival after biopsy (gsaBiopsy) was shorter for patients with glomerular diseases (HR 8.2, CI:3.2–21.1), rejections (HR 4.2, CI:1.7–10.3), chronic changes including IFTA (HR 3.2, CI:1.3–8.0), acute tubular injuries (HR 3.0, CI:1.2–7.8), and borderline changes (HR 2.9, CI:1.1–7.6). Sub‐analysis of rejections showed shorter gsaBiopsy for chronic TCMR (HR 4.7, CI:1.9–11.3), active ABMR (HR 3.6, CI:1.7–7.7) and chronic ABMR (HR 3.5, CI:2.0–6.0). Patients with TCMR Banff grade II (HR 0.35, CI:0.20–0.63) and grade I (HR 0.52, CI:0.29–0.93) had a better gsaBiopsy compared to all other types of rejections. Conclusion Shorter gsaBiopsy was noted in kidneys with glomerular diseases, rejections, acute tubular injuries and borderline changes. TCMR Banff rejections grade I and II were associated with a better prognosis. This Swedish single centre study showed that the impact on allograft survival is dependent on the nature of the biopsy findings, with histological findings of glomerular disease, severe rejections and chronic changes being associated with more rapid allograft loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salmir Nasic
- Research and Development Centre at Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden.,Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johan Mölne
- Institute of Biomedicine, Laboratory Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bernd Stegmayr
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Björn Peters
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Nephrology, Skaraborg Hospital, Skövde, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|