1
|
Halloran PF, Madill-Thomsen KS, Böhmig G, Bromberg J, Budde K, Barner M, Mackova M, Chang J, Einecke G, Eskandary F, Gupta G, Myślak M, Viklicky O, Akalin E, Alhamad T, Anand S, Arnol M, Baliga R, Banasik M, Bingaman A, Blosser C, Brennan D, Chamienia A, Chow K, Ciszek M, de Freitas D, Dęborska-Materkowska D, Debska-Ślizień A, Djamali A, Domański L, Durlik M, Fatica R, Francis I, Fryc J, Gill J, Gill J, Glyda M, Gourishankar S, Grenda R, Gryczman M, Hruba P, Hughes P, Jittirat A, Jurekovic Z, Kamal L, Kamel M, Kant S, Kasiske B, Kojc N, Konopa J, Lan J, Mannon R, Matas A, Mazurkiewicz J, Miglinas M, Mueller T, Narins S, Naumnik B, Patel A, Perkowska-Ptasińska A, Picton M, Piecha G, Poggio E, Bloudíčkova SR, Samaniego-Picota M, Schachtner T, Shin S, Shojai S, Sikosana M, Slatinská J, Smykal-Jankowiak K, Solanki A, Haler ŽV, Vucur K, Weir MR, Wiecek A, Włodarczyk Z, Yang H, Zaky Z. Subthreshold rejection activity in many kidney transplants currently classified as having no rejection. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00461-1. [PMID: 39117038 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Most kidney transplant patients who undergo biopsies are classified as having no rejection based on consensus thresholds. However, we hypothesized that because these patients have normal adaptive immune systems, T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) may exist as subthreshold activity in some transplants currently classified as no rejection. To examine this question, we studied genome-wide microarray results from 5086 kidney transplant biopsies (4170 patients). An updated archetypal analysis designated 56% of biopsies as no rejection. Subthreshold molecular TCMR and/or ABMR activity molecular activity was detectable as elevated classifier scores in many biopsies classified as no rejection, with ABMR activity in many TCMR biopsies and TCMR activity in many ABMR biopsies. In biopsies classified as no rejection histologically and molecularly, molecular TCMR classifier scores correlated with increases in histologic TCMR features and molecular injury, lower eGFR, and higher risk of graft loss, and molecular ABMR activity correlated with increased glomerulitis and donor-specific antibody. No rejection biopsies with high subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity had a higher probability of having TCMR or ABMR respectively diagnosed in a future biopsy. We conclude that many kidney transplant recipients have unrecognized subthreshold TCMR or ABMR activity, with significant implications for future problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip F Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
| | | | | | | | - Klemens Budde
- Charite-Medical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martina Mackova
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jessica Chang
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Gaurav Gupta
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Ondrej Viklicky
- Institute for Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Tarek Alhamad
- Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanjiv Anand
- Intermountain Transplant Services, Murray, UT, USA
| | - Miha Arnol
- University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Adam Bingaman
- Methodist Transplant and Specialty Hospital, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Daniel Brennan
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kevin Chow
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Iman Francis
- Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Justyna Fryc
- Medical University in Bialystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - John Gill
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Ryszard Grenda
- The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Petra Hruba
- The Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Peter Hughes
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | | | | | - Layla Kamal
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | | - Sam Kant
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Nika Kojc
- University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - James Lan
- St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Roslyn Mannon
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | | | - Marius Miglinas
- Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | | | - Seth Narins
- PinnacleHealth Transplant Associates, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | | | - Anita Patel
- Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sung Shin
- University of Ulsan College of Medicine/Assan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Ashish Solanki
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Harold Yang
- PinnacleHealth Transplant Associates, Harrisburg, PA, USA
| | - Ziad Zaky
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nankivell BRIANJ, Taverniti ANNE, Viswanathan SEETHALAKSHMI, Ronquillo JOHN, Carroll ROBERT, Sharma ANKIT. THE RELATIONSHIP OF MICROVASCULAR INFLAMMATION WITH ANTIBODY MEDIATED REJECTION IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00447-7. [PMID: 39084463 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Microvascular inflammation (MVI) is a key diagnostic feature of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), however recipients without donor specific antibodies (DSA) defy etiological classification using C4dptc and conventional DSA assignment. We evaluated MVI≥2 (Banff g+ptc≥2) using Banff 2019 AMR (independent of MVI≥2 but including C4dptc) with unconventional glomerular capillary (C4dglom) and arterial/endothelial (C4dart) immunoperoxidase detection, shared-eplet and subthreshold DSA (MFI 100-499), and capillary ultrastructure from 3398 kidney transplant samples for evidence of AMR. MVI≥2 (n=202 biopsies) from 149 kidneys (12.4% prevalence) correlated with DSA+, C4dptc+, C4dglom+, Banff cg, i, t, ti scores, serum creatinine, proteinuria, and graft failure compared with 202 propensity score matched normal controls. Laboratory reported DSA- MVI≥2 (MFI≥500) occurred in 34.7%, however subthreshold (28.6%), eplet-directed (51.4%), and/or misclassified anti-HLA DSA (12.9%) were identified in 67.1% by forensic reanalysis, with vascular C4d+ staining in 67.1%, and endothelial abnormalities in 57.1%, totalling 87.1%. Etiological analysis attributed 62.9% to AMR (77.8% for DSA- MVI≥2 with glomerulitis) and pure T cellular rejection is 37.1%. C4dptc-DSA- MVI≥2 was unrecognized AMR in 48.0%. Functional outcomes and graft survival were comparable to normal controls. We concluded that DSA- MVI≥2 frequently signified a mild "borderline" phenotype of AMR which was recognizable using novel serological and pathological techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A N N E Taverniti
- NSW Transplantation and Immunogenetics, Australian Red Cross, LifeBlood.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Buxeda A, Crespo M, Chamoun B, Gimeno J, Torres IB, Redondo-Pachón D, Riera M, Burballa C, Pascual J, Mengel M, Adam BA, Pérez-Sáez MJ. Clinical and molecular spectrum of v-lesion. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00448-9. [PMID: 39084462 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Isolated v-lesion presents diagnostic stratification and clinical challenges. We characterized allograft outcomes for this entity based on post-transplant time (early: ≤1 month vs. late: >1 month) and compared its molecular phenotype with other v+ rejection forms. Using the NanoString® B-HOT panel, we analyzed 92 archival FFPE kidney biopsies from three centers: isolated v-lesion (n=23), ABMR v+ (n=26), TCMR v+ (n=10), mixed rejection v+ (n=23), and normal tissue (n=10). Six gene sets (ABMR, DSAST, ENDAT, TCMR, early/acute injury, late injury) were assessed. Early isolated v-lesions had the poorest one-year death-censored graft survival compared to late isolated v-lesions or other rejections (p=0.034). Gene set analysis showed lower TCMR-related gene expression in isolated v+ groups than TCMR and mixed rejection (p<0.001). Both early and late isolated v-lesions had lower ABMR-related gene expression than ABMR, mixed rejection, and TCMR (p≤0.022). Late isolated v-lesions showed reduced DSAST and ENDAT gene expression versus ABMR (p≤0.046); and decreased early/acute injury gene expression than early isolated v+, ABMR, TCMR, and mixed rejection (p≤0.026). In conclusion, isolated v-lesions exhibit distinct gene expression patterns versus other rejection v+ forms. Early isolated v+ is associated with poorer prognosis and increased early/acute injury gene expression than late isolated v+, suggesting distinct etiologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Buxeda
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
| | - Marta Crespo
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Betty Chamoun
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Gimeno
- Department of Pathology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irina B Torres
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Marta Riera
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carla Burballa
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Julio Pascual
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Benjamin A Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dandonneau J, François A, Bertrand D, Candon S, de Nattes T. Systematic Biopsy-Based Transcriptomics and Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Kidney Transplant Rejection in Clinical Practice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2024:01277230-990000000-00426. [PMID: 39012712 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.0000000000000490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Key Points
Impact of biopsy-based transcriptomics in clinical practice is still unclear.Biopsy-based transcriptomics is indicated in a significant proportion of kidney transplant biopsies for the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection.Biopsy-based transcriptomics is useful for antibody-mediated rejection diagnosis in clinical practice.
Background
To diagnose kidney transplant antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), biopsy-based transcriptomics can substitute for some histological criteria according to the Banff classification. However, clinical accessibility of these assays is still limited. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating a routine-compatible molecular assay for the diagnosis of AMR in clinical practice.
Methods
All biopsies performed in our center between 2013 and 2017 were retrospectively included. These biopsies were classified into three groups: AMR biopsies which displayed the full Banff criteria of AMR independently of biopsy-based transcriptomics; undetermined for AMR biopsies which did not meet AMR histological criteria, but would have been considered as AMR if biopsy-based transcriptomics had been positive; and control biopsies which showed no features of rejection.
Results
Within the inclusion period, 342 biopsies had a complete Banff scoring. Thirty-six of the biopsies already met AMR criteria, and 43 of 306 (14%) were considered as undetermined for AMR. Among these biopsies, 24 of 43 (56%) had a molecular signature of AMR, reclassifying them into the AMR category. Five-year death-censored survival of these biopsies was unfavorable and statistically equivalent to that of the AMR category (P = 0.22), with 15 of 24 (63%) graft loss.
Conclusions
A significant proportion of biopsies could benefit from a biopsy-based transcriptomics for AMR diagnosis according to the Banff classification. Using a routine-compatible molecular tool, more than the half of these biopsies were reclassified as AMR and associated with poor allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sophie Candon
- Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, CHU Rouen, Immunology Department, F-76000 Rouen, France
| | - Tristan de Nattes
- Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, CHU Rouen, Nephrology Department, F-76000 Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Giarraputo A, Goutaudier V, Robin B, Angelini A, Sablik M, Aubert O, Rosales IA, Smith RN, Roufosse C, Adam B, Haas M, Colvin RB, Lefaucheur C, Mengel M, Zielinski D, Loupy A. Relevance of the Banff Human Organ Transplant Consensus Gene Panel for Detecting Antibody and T-Cell-Mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts. Kidney Int Rep 2024; 9:2290-2294. [PMID: 39081730 PMCID: PMC11284421 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.04.054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 04/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Giarraputo
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Cardiovascular Pathology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Blaise Robin
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Angelini
- Cardiovascular Pathology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Marta Sablik
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Ivy A. Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rex N. Smith
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College, Center for Inflammatory Disease, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert B. Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Saint Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Dina Zielinski
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université de Paris Cité, INSERM U970, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
- Kidney Transplant Department, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kozakowski N. [Update kidney allograft pathology : A better depiction of microvascular inflammation]. PATHOLOGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 45:269-276. [PMID: 38649466 PMCID: PMC11199282 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-024-01328-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Banff Foundation produces recommendations for classifying various lesions in renal allografts. Experts gather to update the classification every other year based on new scientific and clinical evidence. OBJECTIVES This article presents the most important changes incorporated into the new recommendations after the last Banff conference. MATERIALS AND METHODS The author of this article personally took part in the Banff conference and the subsequent survey, reported on the activities of a Banff working group (peritubular capillaritis) on-site, and contributed to drafting the recently published meeting report. RESULTS Lesions of antibody-mediated kidney allograft rejection (AMR), especially microvascular inflammation, have been part of the diagnostic algorithm for over 20 years. Experts advocated for a simplified AMR algorithm and mindful inclusion of molecular pathological data in the clinicopathological reflection regarding therapeutic decision. A new, more descriptive diagnostic entity-microvascular inflammation, C4d negative and DSA negative-has been introduced into the AMR category to acknowledge this histological constellation and motivate research into this pathophysiologically and immunologically probably different phenotype. CONCLUSIONS The Banff classification provides a structure for diagnosing kidney transplant pathology. Regular updates serve to adapt to ever-growing knowledge about alloimmunity. Particular challenges are capturing the complexity of various immunological scenarios and ensuring an understandable representation of these in a pathology report.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Kozakowski
- Klinisches Institut für Pathologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Balakrishnan S, Alexander MP, Schinstock C. Challenges and opportunities for designing clinical trials for antibody mediated rejection. FRONTIERS IN TRANSPLANTATION 2024; 3:1389005. [PMID: 38993760 PMCID: PMC11235363 DOI: 10.3389/frtra.2024.1389005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in kidney transplantation, with 1-year graft survival nearing 95%. However, long-term allograft survival remains suboptimal, with a 10-year overall graft survival rate of only 53.6% for deceased donor transplant recipients. Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of death-censored graft loss, yet no therapy has demonstrated efficacy in large, randomized trials, despite substantial investment from pharmaceutical companies. Several clinical trials aimed to treat chronic ABMR in the past decade have yielded disappointing results or were prematurely terminated, attributed to factors including incomplete understanding of disease mechanisms, heterogeneous patient populations with comorbidities, slow disease progression, and limited patient numbers. This review aims to discuss opportunities for improving retrospective and prospective studies of ABMR, focusing on addressing heterogeneity, outcome measurement, and strategies to enhance patient enrollment to inform study design, data collection, and reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suryanarayanan Balakrishnan
- Division of Hypertension and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Mariam P. Alexander
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Division of Hypertension and Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Nattes T, Beadle J, Roufosse C. Biopsy-based transcriptomics in the diagnosis of kidney transplant rejection. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2024; 33:273-282. [PMID: 38411022 PMCID: PMC10990030 DOI: 10.1097/mnh.0000000000000974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The last year has seen considerable progress in translational research exploring the clinical utility of biopsy-based transcriptomics of kidney transplant biopsies to enhance the diagnosis of rejection. This review will summarize recent findings with a focus on different platforms, potential clinical applications, and barriers to clinical adoption. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature has focussed on using biopsy-based transcriptomics to improve diagnosis of rejection, in particular antibody-mediated rejection. Different techniques of gene expression analysis (reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR, microarrays, probe-based techniques) have been used either on separate samples with ideally preserved RNA, or on left over tissue from routine biopsy processing. Despite remarkable consistency in overall patterns of gene expression, there is no consensus on acceptable indications, or whether biopsy-based transcriptomics adds significant value at reasonable cost to current diagnostic practice. SUMMARY Access to biopsy-based transcriptomics will widen as regulatory approvals for platforms and gene expression models develop. Clinicians need more evidence and guidance to inform decisions on how to use precious biopsy samples for biopsy-based transcriptomics, and how to integrate results with standard histology-based diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan de Nattes
- Univ Rouen Normandie, INSERM U1234, CHU Rouen, Department of Nephrology, Rouen, France
| | - Jack Beadle
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mengel M, Adam BA. Emerging phenotypes in kidney transplant rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:97-103. [PMID: 38032262 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review focuses on more recently emerging rejection phenotypes in the context of time post transplantation and the resulting differential diagnostic challenges. It also discusses how novel ancillary diagnostic tools can potentially increase the accuracy of biopsy-based rejection diagnosis. RECENT FINDINGS With advances in reducing immunological risk at transplantation and improved immunosuppression treatment renal allograft survival improved. However, allograft rejection remains a major challenge and represent a frequent course for allograft failure. With prolonged allograft survival, novel phenotypes of rejection are emerging, which can show complex overlap and transition between cellular and antibody-mediated rejection mechanisms as well as mixtures of acute/active and chronic diseases. With the emerging complexity in rejection phenotypes, it is crucial to achieve diagnostic accuracy in the individual patient. SUMMARY The prospective validation and adoption of novel molecular and computational diagnostic tools into well defined and appropriate clinical context of uses will improve our ability to accurately diagnose, stage, and grade allograft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gauthier PT, Madill-Thomsen KS, Demko Z, Prewett A, Gauthier P, Halloran PF. Distinct Molecular Processes Mediate Donor-derived Cell-free DNA Release From Kidney Transplants in Different Disease States. Transplantation 2024; 108:898-910. [PMID: 38150492 PMCID: PMC10962427 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among all biopsies in the Trifecta-Kidney Study ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04239703), elevated plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) correlated most strongly with molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but was also elevated in other states: T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), acute kidney injury (AKI), and some apparently normal biopsies. The present study aimed to define the molecular correlates of plasma dd-cfDNA within specific states. METHODS Dd-cfDNA was measured by the Prospera test. Molecular rejection and injury states were defined using the Molecular Microscope system. We studied the correlation between dd-cfDNA and the expression of genes, transcript sets, and classifier scores within specific disease states, and compared AMR, TCMR, and AKI to biopsies classified as normal and no injury (NRNI). RESULTS In all 604 biopsies, dd-cfDNA was elevated in AMR, TCMR, and AKI. Within AMR biopsies, dd-cfDNA correlated with AMR activity and stage. Within AKI, the correlations reflected acute parenchymal injury, including cell cycling. Within biopsies classified as MMDx Normal and archetypal No injury (NRNI), dd-cfDNA still correlated significantly with rejection- and injury-related genes. TCMR activity (eg, the TCMR Prob classifier) correlated with dd-cfDNA, but within TCMR biopsies, top gene correlations were complex and not the top TCMR-selective genes. CONCLUSIONS In kidney transplants, elevated plasma dd-cfDNA is associated with 3 distinct molecular states in the donor tissue: AMR, recent parenchymal injury (including cell cycling), and TCMR, potentially complicated by parenchymal disruption. Moreover, subtle rejection- and injury-related changes in the donor tissue can contribute to dd-cfDNA elevations in transplants considered to have no rejection or injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick T. Gauthier
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transcriptome Sciences Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transcriptome Sciences Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Philip F. Halloran
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Transcriptome Sciences Inc, Edmonton, AB, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alexander MP, Zaidi M, Larson N, Mullan A, Pavelko KD, Stegall MD, Bentall A, Wouters BG, McKee T, Taner T. Exploring the single-cell immune landscape of kidney allograft inflammation using imaging mass cytometry. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:549-563. [PMID: 37979921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Kidney allograft inflammation, mostly attributed to rejection and infection, is an important cause of graft injury and loss. Standard histopathological assessment of allograft inflammation provides limited insights into biological processes and the immune landscape. Here, using imaging mass cytometry with a panel of 28 validated biomarkers, we explored the single-cell landscape of kidney allograft inflammation in 32 kidney transplant biopsies and 247 high-dimensional histopathology images of various phenotypes of allograft inflammation (antibody-mediated rejection, T cell-mediated rejection, BK nephropathy, and chronic pyelonephritis). Using novel analytical tools, for cell segmentation, we segmented over 900 000 cells and developed a tissue-based classifier using over 3000 manually annotated kidney microstructures (glomeruli, tubules, interstitium, and arteries). Using PhenoGraph, we identified 11 immune and 9 nonimmune clusters and found a high prevalence of memory T cell and macrophage-enriched immune populations across phenotypes. Additionally, we trained a machine learning classifier to identify spatial biomarkers that could discriminate between the different allograft inflammatory phenotypes. Further validation of imaging mass cytometry in larger cohorts and with more biomarkers will likely help interrogate kidney allograft inflammation in more depth than has been possible to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam P Alexander
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Mark Zaidi
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Nicholas Larson
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aidan Mullan
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kevin D Pavelko
- Immune Monitoring Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark D Stegall
- Departments of Surgery and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrew Bentall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bradly G Wouters
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Canada; Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Trevor McKee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Pathomics Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timucin Taner
- Departments of Surgery and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cristoferi I, Varol H, van Baardwijk M, Rahiem L, Lila KA, van den Bosch TPP, Baan CC, Hesselink DA, Kramann R, Minnee RC, Mustafa DAM, Reinders MEJ, Roelen DL, Shahzad-Arshad SP, Smith RN, Stubbs AP, Colvin RB, Rosales IA, Clahsen-van Groningen MC. Multiomic profiling of transplant glomerulopathy reveals a novel T-cell dominant subclass. Kidney Int 2024; 105:812-823. [PMID: 38128610 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Kidney transplant (KTx) biopsies showing transplant glomerulopathy (TG) (glomerular basement membrane double contours (cg) > 0) and microvascular inflammation (MVI) in the absence of C4d staining and donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) do not fulfill the criteria for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CA-AMR) diagnosis and do not fit into any other Banff category. To investigate this, we initiated a multicenter intercontinental study encompassing 36 cases, comparing the immunomic and transcriptomic profiles of 14 KTx biopsies classified as cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- with 22 classified as CA-AMR DSA+/C4d+ through novel transcriptomic analysis using the NanoString Banff-Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) panel and subsequent orthogonal subset analysis using two innovative 5-marker multiplex immunofluorescent panels. Nineteen genes were differentially expressed between the two study groups. Samples diagnosed with CA-AMR DSA+/C4d+ showed a higher glomerular abundance of natural killer cells and higher transcriptomic cell type scores for macrophages in an environment characterized by increased expression of complement-related genes (i.e., C5AR1) and higher activity of angiogenesis, interstitial fibrosis tubular atrophy, CA-AMR, and DSA-related pathways when compared to samples diagnosed with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d-. Samples diagnosed with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- displayed a higher glomerular abundance and activity of T cells (CD3+, CD3+CD8+, and CD3+CD8-). Thus, we show that using novel multiomic techniques, KTx biopsies with cg+MVI DSA-/C4d- have a prominent T-cell presence and activity, putting forward the possibility that these represent a more T-cell dominant phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iacopo Cristoferi
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Hilal Varol
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Myrthe van Baardwijk
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Layla Rahiem
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karishma A Lila
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Thierry P P van den Bosch
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carla C Baan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dennis A Hesselink
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rafael Kramann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; Department of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Robert C Minnee
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dana A M Mustafa
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, the Tumor Immuno-Pathology Laboratory, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Shazia P Shahzad-Arshad
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rex N Smith
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew P Stubbs
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy A Rosales
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marian C Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Harmacek D, Weidmann L, Castrezana Lopez K, Schmid N, Korach R, Bortel N, von Moos S, Rho E, Helmchen B, Gaspert A, Schachtner T. Molecular diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection: Evaluating biopsy-based transcript diagnostics in the presence of donor-specific antibodies but without microvascular inflammation, a single-center descriptive analysis. Am J Transplant 2024:S1600-6135(24)00244-2. [PMID: 38548057 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics may identify molecular antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) when microvascular inflammation (MVI) is absent. In this single-center cohort, biopsy-based transcript diagnostics were validated in 326 kidney allograft biopsies. A total of 71 histological AMR and 35 T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) cases were identified as molecular AMR and TCMR in 55% and 63%, respectively. Among 121 cases without MVI (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis = 0), 45 (37%) donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive and 76 (63%) DSA-negative cases were analyzed. Twenty-one out of the 121 (17%) cases showed borderline changes, or TCMR, while BK nephropathy was excluded. None of the 45 DSA-positive patients showed molecular AMR. Among 76 DSA-negative patients, 2 had mixed molecular AMR/TCMR. All-AMR phenotype scores (sum of R4-R6) exhibited median values of 0.13 and 0.12 for DSA-positive and DSA-negative patients, respectively (P = .84). A total of 13% (6/45) DSA-positive and 11% (8/76) DSA-negative patients showed an all-AMR phenotype score > 0.30 (P = .77). Patients with a higher all-AMR phenotype score showed 33% more histologic TCMR (P = .005). The median all-AMR phenotype scores of glomerular basement membrane double contours = 0 and glomerular basement membrane double contours > 0 biopsies were 0.12 and 0.10, respectively (P = .35). Biopsy-based transcript diagnostics did not identify molecular AMR in cases without MVI. Follow-up biopsies and outcome data should evaluate the clinical relevance of subthreshold molecular alterations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dusan Harmacek
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Weidmann
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Nicolas Schmid
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Korach
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Bortel
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Seraina von Moos
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Elena Rho
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Birgit Helmchen
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ariana Gaspert
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Schachtner
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Naesens M, Roufosse C, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Adam BA, Aubert O, Böhmig GA, Callemeyn J, Clahsen-van Groningen M, Cornell LD, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Einecke G, Fogo AB, Gibson IW, Halloran P, Hidalgo LG, Horsfield C, Huang E, Kikić Ž, Kozakowski N, Nankivell B, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Schinstock C, Solez K, Tambur AR, Thaunat O, Wiebe C, Zielinski D, Colvin R, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:338-349. [PMID: 38032300 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Benjamin A Adam
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marian Clahsen-van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Philip Halloran
- Department of Medicine, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Luis G Hidalgo
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, USA
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Brian Nankivell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Department of Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multi-Organ Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Dina Zielinski
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Robert Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roufosse C, Naesens M, Haas M, Lefaucheur C, Mannon RB, Afrouzian M, Alachkar N, Aubert O, Bagnasco SM, Batal I, Bellamy COC, Broecker V, Budde K, Clahsen-Van Groningen M, Coley SM, Cornell LD, Dadhania D, Demetris AJ, Einecke G, Farris AB, Fogo AB, Friedewald J, Gibson IW, Horsfield C, Huang E, Husain SA, Jackson AM, Kers J, Kikić Ž, Klein A, Kozakowski N, Liapis H, Mangiola M, Montgomery RA, Nankinvell B, Neil DAH, Nickerson P, Rabant M, Randhawa P, Riella LV, Rosales I, Royal V, Sapir-Pichhadze R, Sarder P, Sarwal M, Schinstock C, Stegall M, Solez K, van der Laak J, Wiebe C, Colvin RB, Loupy A, Mengel M. The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Work Plan: Data-driven refinement of the Banff Classification for renal allografts. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:350-361. [PMID: 37931753 PMCID: PMC11135910 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
The XVIth Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Alberta, Canada, from September 19 to 23, 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. In addition to a key focus on the impact of microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis on the Banff Classification, further sessions were devoted to other aspects of kidney transplant pathology, in particular T cell-mediated rejection, activity and chronicity indices, digital pathology, xenotransplantation, clinical trials, and surrogate endpoints. Although the output of these sessions has not led to any changes in the classification, the key role of Banff Working Groups in phrasing unanswered questions, and coordinating and disseminating results of investigations addressing these unanswered questions was emphasized. This paper summarizes the key Banff Meeting 2022 sessions not covered in the Banff Kidney Meeting 2022 Report paper and also provides an update on other Banff Working Group activities relevant to kidney allografts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candice Roufosse
- Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Mark Haas
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Marjan Afrouzian
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Texas, USA
| | - Nada Alachkar
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Serena M Bagnasco
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ibrahim Batal
- Pathology & Cell Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Verena Broecker
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marian Clahsen-Van Groningen
- Department of Pathology and Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus University Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Institute of Experimental Medicine and Systems Biology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Shana M Coley
- Transplant Translational Research, Arkana Laboratories, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lynn D Cornell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Darshana Dadhania
- Department Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anthony J Demetris
- UPMC Hepatic and Transplantation Pathology, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alton B Farris
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, USA
| | - Agnes B Fogo
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - John Friedewald
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, USA
| | - Ian W Gibson
- Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | | | - Edmund Huang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Syed A Husain
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Jesper Kers
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Željko Kikić
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Helen Liapis
- Ludwig Maximillian University Munich, Nephrology Center, Germany
| | | | | | - Brian Nankinvell
- Department of Renal Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Desley A H Neil
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Marion Rabant
- Pathology department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Pathology, Thomas E. Starzl Transplant Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leonardo V Riella
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ivy Rosales
- Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Virginie Royal
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
- Division of Nephrology & Multiorgan Transplant Program, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pinaki Sarder
- Department of Medicine-Quantitative Health, University of Florida College of Medicine, Florida, USA
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Division of MultiOrgan Transplantation, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Carrie Schinstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark Stegall
- Department Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kim Solez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine and Department of Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, PARCC, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, France & Department of Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhang H, Haun RS, Collin F, Cassol C, Napier JOH, Wilson J, Hassen S, Ararat K, Boils C, Messias N, Caza TN, Cossey LN, Sharma S, Ambruzs JM, Agrawal N, Shekhtman G, Tian W, Srinivas T, Qu K, Woodward RN, Larsen CP, Stone S, Coley SM. Development and Validation of a Multiclass Model Defining Molecular Archetypes of Kidney Transplant Rejection: A Large Cohort Study of the Banff Human Organ Transplant Gene Expression Panel. J Transl Med 2024; 104:100304. [PMID: 38092179 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Gene expression profiling from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) renal allograft biopsies is a promising approach for feasibly providing a molecular diagnosis of rejection. However, large-scale studies evaluating the performance of models using NanoString platform data to define molecular archetypes of rejection are lacking. We tested a diverse retrospective cohort of over 1400 FFPE biopsy specimens, rescored according to Banff 2019 criteria and representing 10 of 11 United Network of Organ Sharing regions, using the Banff Human Organ Transplant panel from NanoString and developed a multiclass model from the gene expression data to assign relative probabilities of 4 molecular archetypes: No Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection, T Cell-Mediated Rejection, and Mixed Rejection. Using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regularized regression with 10-fold cross-validation fitted to 1050 biopsies in the discovery cohort and technically validated on an additional 345 biopsies, our model achieved overall accuracy of 85% in the discovery cohort and 80% in the validation cohort, with ≥75% positive predictive value for each class, except for the Mixed Rejection class in the validation cohort (positive predictive value, 53%). This study represents the technical validation of the first model built from a large and diverse sample of diagnostic FFPE biopsy specimens to define and classify molecular archetypes of histologically defined diagnoses as derived from Banff Human Organ Transplant panel gene expression profiling data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jon Wilson
- Arkana Laboratories, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sikosana ML, Reeve J, Madill-Thomsen KS, Halloran PF. Using Regression Equations to Enhance Interpretation of Histology Lesions of Kidney Transplant Rejection. Transplantation 2024; 108:445-454. [PMID: 37726883 PMCID: PMC10798587 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Banff system for histologic diagnosis of rejection in kidney transplant biopsies uses guidelines to assess designated features-lesions, donor-specific antibody (DSA), and C4d staining. We explored whether using regression equations to interpret the features as well as current guidelines could establish the relative importance of each feature and improve histologic interpretation. METHODS We developed logistic regression equations using the designated features to predict antibody-mediated rejection (AMR/mixed) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR/mixed) in 1679 indication biopsies from the INTERCOMEX study ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01299168). Equations were trained on molecular diagnoses independent of the designated features. RESULTS In regression and random forests, the important features predicting molecular rejection were as follows: for AMR, ptc and g, followed by cg; for TCMR, t > i. V-lesions were relatively unimportant. C4d and DSA were also relatively unimportant for predicting AMR: by AUC, the model excluding them (0.853) was nearly as good as the model including them (0.860). Including time posttransplant slightly but significantly improved all models. By AUC, regression predicted molecular AMR and TCMR better than Banff histologic diagnoses. More importantly, in biopsies called "no rejection" by Banff guidelines, regression equations based on histology features identified histologic and molecular rejection-related changes in some biopsies and improved survival predictions. Thus, regression can screen for missed rejection. CONCLUSIONS Using lesion-based regression equations in addition to Banff histology guidelines defines the relative important of histology features for identifying rejection, allows screening for potential missed diagnoses, and permits early estimates of AMR when C4d and DSA are not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid L.N. Sikosana
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jeff Reeve
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Philip F. Halloran
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gauthier PT, Mackova M, Hirji A, Weinkauf J, Timofte IL, Snell GI, Westall GP, Havlin J, Lischke R, Zajacová A, Simonek J, Hachem R, Kreisel D, Levine D, Kubisa B, Piotrowska M, Juvet S, Keshavjee S, Jaksch P, Klepetko W, Halloran K, Halloran PF. Defining a natural killer cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state in lung transplant transbronchial biopsies. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1922-1938. [PMID: 37295720 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In lung transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) diagnosed using the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria is uncommon compared with other organs, and previous studies failed to find molecular AMR (ABMR) in lung biopsies. However, understanding of ABMR has changed with the recognition that ABMR in kidney transplants is often donor-specific antibody (DSA)-negative and associated with natural killer (NK) cell transcripts. We therefore searched for a similar molecular ABMR-like state in transbronchial biopsies using gene expression microarray results from the INTERLUNG study (#NCT02812290). After optimizing rejection-selective transcript sets in a training set (N = 488), the resulting algorithms separated an NK cell-enriched molecular rejection-like state (NKRL) from T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR)/Mixed in a test set (N = 488). Applying this approach to all 896 transbronchial biopsies distinguished 3 groups: no rejection, TCMR/Mixed, and NKRL. Like TCMR/Mixed, NKRL had increased expression of all-rejection transcripts, but NKRL had increased expression of NK cell transcripts, whereas TCMR/Mixed had increased effector T cell and activated macrophage transcripts. NKRL was usually DSA-negative and not recognized as AMR clinically. TCMR/Mixed was associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, reduced one-second forced expiratory volume at the time of biopsy, and short-term graft failure, but NKRL was not. Thus, some lung transplants manifest a molecular state similar to DSA-negative ABMR in kidney and heart transplants, but its clinical significance must be established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alim Hirji
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Greg I Snell
- Alfred Hospital Lung Transplant Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Glen P Westall
- Alfred Hospital Lung Transplant Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jan Havlin
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Jan Simonek
- University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ramsey Hachem
- Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Daniel Kreisel
- Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Bartosz Kubisa
- Pomeranian Medical University of Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland
| | | | - Stephen Juvet
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaf Keshavjee
- Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Franco-Acevedo A, Pathoulas CL, Murphy PA, Valenzuela NM. The Transplant Bellwether: Endothelial Cells in Antibody-Mediated Rejection. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY (BALTIMORE, MD. : 1950) 2023; 211:1276-1285. [PMID: 37844279 PMCID: PMC10593495 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Ab-mediated rejection of organ transplants remains a stubborn, frequent problem affecting patient quality of life, graft function, and grant survival, and for which few efficacious therapies currently exist. Although the field has gained considerable knowledge over the last two decades on how anti-HLA Abs cause acute tissue injury and promote inflammation, there has been a gap in linking these effects with the chronic inflammation, vascular remodeling, and persistent alloimmunity that leads to deterioration of graft function over the long term. This review will discuss new data emerging over the last 5 y that provide clues into how ongoing Ab-endothelial cell interactions may shape vascular fate and propagate alloimmunity in organ transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Franco-Acevedo
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Patrick A Murphy
- Center for Vascular Biology, University of Connecticut Medical School, Farmington, CT
| | - Nicole M Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rosales IA, Smith RN, Colvin RB. Histologic and molecular features of antibody-mediated rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:340-344. [PMID: 37526088 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize the highlights from recent research that involved pathological and molecular analysis of kidney allografts. RECENT FINDINGS As the research on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to evolve, studies are focused on identification through transcript studies of pathogenetic pathways involved in the development of AMR as well as refinement of diagnostic methods either by correlating Banff pathologic lesions with clinical and molecular data or by machine learning. Of note, the past year has generated high impact research that underscore the importance of pathologic and molecular correlations and detection of transcripts or gene sets that would aid prognostication. The studies involving refinement of pathologic criteria also highlight the continuous efforts to achieve diagnostic accuracy and standardization. SUMMARY Research involving histologic and molecular characteristics that define AMR are central to identification and understanding of pathogenetic pathways and remain critical in the development of diagnostic criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivy A Rosales
- Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rex Neal Smith
- Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert B Colvin
- Immunopathology Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology
- Center for Transplantation Sciences, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
D’Elia JA, Weinrauch LA. Hyperglycemia and Hyperlipidemia with Kidney or Liver Transplantation: A Review. BIOLOGY 2023; 12:1185. [PMID: 37759585 PMCID: PMC10525610 DOI: 10.3390/biology12091185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Although solid organ transplantation in persons with diabetes mellitus is often associated with hyperglycemia, the risk of hyperlipidemia in all organ transplant recipients is often underestimated. The diagnosis of diabetes often predates transplantation; however, in a moderate percentage of allograft recipients, perioperative hyperglycemia occurs triggered by antirejection regimens. Post-transplant prescription of glucocorticoids, calcineurin inhibitors and mTOR inhibitors are associated with increased lipid concentrations. The existence of diabetes mellitus prior to or following a liver transplant is associated with shorter times of useful allograft function. A cycle involving Smad, TGF beta, m-TOR and toll-like receptors has been identified in the contribution of rejection and aging of allografts. Glucocorticoids (prednisone) and calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) induce hyperglycemia associated with insulin resistance. Azathioprine, mycophenolate and prednisone are associated with lipogenesis. mTOR inhibitors (rapamycin) are used to decrease doses of atherogenic agents used for immunosuppression. Post-transplant medication management must balance immune suppression and glucose and lipid control. Concerns regarding rejection often override those relative to systemic and organ vascular aging and survival. This review focuses attention on the underlying mechanism of relationships between glycemia/lipidemia control, transplant rejection and graft aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Larry A. Weinrauch
- Kidney and Hypertension Section, E P Joslin Research Laboratory, Joslin Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA; jd'
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sasaki H, Tanabe T, Tsuji T, Hotta K. Mechanism and treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Int J Urol 2023; 30:624-633. [PMID: 37306194 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Chronic antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplantation is a major cause of late-stage graft loss. Donor-specific antibodies are the main cause of antibody-mediated rejection; in particular, de novo donor-specific antibodies are a risk factor for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The level of de novo donor-specific antibodies tends to increase with time throughout long-term graft survival. Donor-specific antibodies induce humoral rejection through complement activation, which results in tissue injury and coagulation. Additionally, complement activation promotes the migration of inflammatory cells through the innate immune response, causing endothelial injury. This inflammatory response may cause persistent glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis, leading to fixed pathological lesions that impair graft function. No treatment has been established for chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a condition in which antibody-mediated rejection becomes irreversible. Thus, antibody-mediated rejection must be detected and treated while it is still reversible. In this review, we discuss the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies and the mechanisms leading to chronic antibody-mediated rejection and summarize the current treatment options and the latest biomarkers for detecting chronic antibody-mediated rejection at an earlier stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hajime Sasaki
- Division of Renal Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Urology, Jichi Medical University Hospital, Shimotsuke, Japan
- Department of Kidney Transplant Surgery, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tatsu Tanabe
- Department of Kidney Transplant Surgery, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuji
- Department of Pathology, Sapporo City General Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Kiyohiko Hotta
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|