Open randomized trial comparing early withdrawal of either cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients initially treated with a triple drug regimen

Is the failure of recent trials on withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors due to inadequate mycophenolic acid dosing?

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the mainstay immunosuppressive therapy after kidney transplantation, despite their side effects. Recently, several randomized controlled trials attempting CNI withdrawal or minimization in stable, low-risk kidney transplant recipients led to an unacceptable risk of acute rejection and de novo HLA antibody formation. In the opinions of many, these trials definitively demonstrated that CNI-free regimens in the context of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) maintenance are too risky. It can be argued, however, that the investigators failed to optimize the dose of the remaining immunosuppressive therapy. In particular, the potential benefit of MMF dosing based on the targeted mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentration was not taken into account. In this review, we present an overview of the studies on CNI withdrawal, both recent and older, paying specific attention to the MMF dose and elaborating on the possible benefit of MPA monitoring in this setting.

A comparison of mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin inhibitor as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background/aim

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparison and its timing between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients.

Materials and methods

The RCTs of MMF versus CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCRCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov. After screening relevant RCTs, two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Relative risk (RR) was used to report dichotomous data, while mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to report continuous outcomes. The analysis was conducted using the random-effect model due to the expected heterogeneity among different studies. Four subgroups were allocated to compare MMF with CNI as maintenance immunosuppression: (1) after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, (2) after 6 months of CNI-based therapy, (3) after 12 months of CNI-based therapy, and (4) in recipients with allograft dysfunction.

Results

Twelve RCTs with 950 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis presented the following results upon comparison between MMF and CNI as maintenance immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients: (1) MMF significantly improved the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) not only in the comparison performed after 3, 6, or 12 months of CNI-based therapy but also in the comparison of recipients with allograft dysfunction, (2) MMF may increase the risk of acute rejection in the comparison performed after 3 months of CNI-based therapy, but no increase was noted in the comparison performed after 6 or 12 months of CNI-based therapy.

Conclusion

Our present meta-analysis suggested that MMF followed at least 6 months of CNI-based therapy is an effective maintenance immunosuppressive regimen for kidney transplant recipients to improve renal function but not increase rejection.

Failure of Calcineurin Inhibitor (Tacrolimus) Weaning Randomized Trial in Long-Term Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients

Long-term renal transplant outcome is limited by side effects of immunosuppressive drugs, particularly calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). We assumed that some patients selected for a "low immunological risk of rejection" could be eligible and benefit from a CNI weaning strategy. We designed a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study (Eudract: 2010-019574-33) to analyze the benefit-risk ratio of tacrolimus weaning on highly selected patients (≥4 years of transplantation, normal histology, stable graft function, no anti-HLA immunization). The primary endpoint was improvement of renal function. Fifty-two patients were scheduled in each treatment arm, placebo compared to the CNI maintenance arm. Only 10 patients were eligible and randomized. Five patients were assigned to the placebo arm and five were assigned to the tacrolimus maintenance arm. In the tacrolimus maintenance arm, all patients maintained stable graft function and no immunological events occurred. Contrastingly, in the placebo arm, all five patients had to reintroduce a full dose of tacrolimus since three of them presented an acute rejection episode (one humoral, one mixed, and one borderline) and two displayed anti-HLA antibodies without histological lesion (one donor-specific antibodies [DSA] and one non-DSA). Clearly, tacrolimus withdrawal must be avoided even in long-term highly selective stable kidney recipients.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard-dose regimens; moderate-strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine-based strategies and low-risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus-based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes.

Adverse Outcomes of Tacrolimus Withdrawal in Immune-Quiescent Kidney Transplant Recipients

Concerns about adverse effects of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have prompted development of protocols that minimize their use. Whereas previous CNI withdrawal trials in heterogeneous cohorts showed unacceptable rates of acute rejection (AR), we hypothesized that we could identify individuals capable of tolerating CNI withdrawal by targeting immunologically quiescent kidney transplant recipients. The Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-09 Trial was a randomized, prospective study of nonsensitized primary recipients of living donor kidney transplants. Subjects received rabbit antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Six months post-transplantation, subjects without de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), AR, or inflammation at protocol biopsy were randomized to wean off or remain on tacrolimus. The intended primary end point was the change in interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy score between implantation and 24-month protocol biopsies. Serially collected urine CXCL9 ELISA results were correlated with outcomes. The study was terminated prematurely because of unacceptable rates of AR (4 of 14) and/or de novo DSAs (5 of 14) in the tacrolimus withdrawal arm. Positive urinary CXCL9 predated clinical detection of AR by a median of 15 days. Analyses showed that >16 HLA-DQ epitope mismatches and pretransplant, peripheral blood, donor-reactive IFN-γ ELISPOT assay results correlated with development of DSAs and/or AR on tacrolimus withdrawal. Although data indicate that urinary CXCL9 monitoring, epitope mismatches, and ELISPOT assays are potentially informative, complete CNI withdrawal must be strongly discouraged in kidney transplant recipients who are receiving standard-of-care immunosuppression, including those who are deemed to be immunologically quiescent on the basis of current clinical and laboratory criteria.

Calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens based on mycophenolic acid after kidney transplantation

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has dramatically reduced the number of acute rejections and improved kidney allograft survival. However, CNIs can also cause kidney damage and several adverse events. This has prompted transplant physicians to use CNI-sparing regimens. CNI withdrawal, minimization, or avoidance protocols have been conducted using mycophenolic acid (MPA), and/or mammalian-target-of-rapamycin inhibitors, and/or belatacept. Herein, we review the outcomes of minimizing, withdrawing, or avoiding CNIs when giving mycophenolic acid to de novo and maintenance kidney transplant patients. Protocols on CNI withdrawal, when based on MPA without mammalian-target-of-rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) or belatacept, in de novo and maintenance kidney transplant patients, are associated with an increased risk of acute rejection. Consequently, these strategies have been abandoned and are not recommended. Protocols on CNI minimization show a beneficial impact of kidney function and acceptable acute rejection rates mainly in patients who have been recipients of a graft for >3-5 years. However, no significant improvement to graft survival has been observed.

Safety of immunosuppressive drugs used as maintenance therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To evaluate the safety of regimens containing calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), proliferation signal inhibitors (TOR-I) and antimetabolites, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A total of 4,960 citations were identified in our electronic search and 14 additional articles were identified through hand searching. Forty-eight articles (11,432 participants) from 42 studies (38 RCTs and four cohorts) met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis results revealed the following: (i) tacrolimus was associated with an increased risk for diabetes and lower risk of dyslipidemia, compared to cyclosporine; (ii) mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was associated with increased risk for total infections, abdominal pain, diarrhea and vomiting, compared with azathioprine; (iii) sirolimus was associated with higher risk of anemia, diabetes, dyslipidemia, lymphoceles and withdrawal compared to tacrolimus or cyclosporine, and cyclosporine was associated with an increased risk of CMV infection; (iv) the combination of CNI with antimetabolites was associated with more adverse events than CNI alone; (v) TOR-I was related to more adverse events than MMF. The data observed in this meta-analysis are similar to those describe by others authors; thus, the choice of treatment must be made by the clinical staff based on specific patient characteristics.

Long-term outcomes after cyclosporine or mycophenolate withdrawal in kidney transplantation - results from an aborted trial

Long-term triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone may be excessively powerful for many transplant recipients. We compared withdrawal of either MMF or CsA in stable kidney transplants on triple immunosuppression. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled 12-months trial in stable kidney transplants. The patients who withdrew CsA were given MMF 2 g/d, and CsA troughs were between 75 and 125 ng/mL in MMF withdrawal. Planned inclusion was 298 patients. The study was prematurely aborted after inclusion of 39 patients. Acute rejection rates were 6/20 (30%) in the MMF group compared with 0/19 (0%) in the CsA group (p = 0.02). Time to acute rejections was 4.0-28.7 months after withdrawal. Trough concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CsA showed therapeutic levels. The subjects have been observed for eight yr, and of the 28 patients remaining on randomized therapy, the MMF patients preserved graft function better than CsA patients. Death-censored graft survival was 75% and 95% (p = 0.18) and patient survival was 70% and 68% (p = 0.99) in the MMF and CsA groups, respectively, at the end of long-term follow-up. CsA withdrawal was associated with a high rate of acute rejections. Initially, the treatment of acute rejections was successful. However, five of six lost their grafts in the long term.

Randomized trial comparing late concentration-controlled calcineurin inhibitor or mycophenolate mofetil withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Early calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has not become routine practice, due to concerns about excess acute rejection. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be advantageous when the CNI or MMF is withdrawn.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, concentration-controlled withdrawal study enrolled 177 stable renal transplant recipients on maintenance CNI-based immunosuppression, combined with steroids and MMF. After the feasibility phase of the study, patients were randomized to MMF-withdrawal (target area under the time-concentration curve-cyclosporine: 3250 ng·hr/mL or tacrolimus: 120 ng·hr/mL) or CNI-withdrawal (target area under the time-concentration curve-mycophenolic acid: 75 μg·hr/mL).

RESULTS

The estimated glomerular filtration rate (modification of diet in renal disease) remained significantly better after CNI elimination (59.5±2.1 mL/min vs. 51.1±2.1 mL/min, P = 0.006) up to 3 years and resulted in less functional decline, including the subgroup with an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 50 mL/min at baseline (P = 0.03). At 6 months, one patient in the MMF-withdrawal group (1.3%) and three in the CNI-withdrawal group (3.8%) experienced acute rejection (P = 0.62). The defined higher mycophenolic acid exposure was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate that with time the large majority of stable renal transplant recipients can be safely reduced to dual therapy with MMF or CNIs, applying concentration-controlled dosing. CNI-free patients, including those with moderate renal allograft dysfunction, have the benefit of improved renal function, whereas the risk of acute rejection after late withdrawal is low.

Immunosuppression: does one regimen fit all?

There has been considerable interest in the individualization of immunosuppressive regimens in an attempt to avoid side effects and improve long-term outcomes. Most available studies have addressed steroid and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in an attempt to prevent the development of chronic allograft dysfunction and cardiovascular mortality. Herein, we evaluate the available evidence for incorporation of these novel strategies in standard clinical care of kidney transplant recipients. Protocol biopsies, pharmacogenetics, and other assays have been developed to guide tailoring of immunosuppression; however, although promising results have been obtained, trials showing their ability to improve long-term outcome are lacking and urgently needed.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation: a viable option?

The introduction, in the mid-1980s, of calcineurin inhibitors - namely ciclosporin (cyclosporine) and later tacrolimus - has significantly improved short-term renal graft survival by lowering acute rejection rates in both adult and pediatric kidney transplantation. Nonetheless, long-term transplant survival is still not satisfactory, with calcineurin inhibitor-induced chronic nephrotoxicity being one of the main causes of progressive nephron loss and declining renal transplant function. Hence, different immunosuppressant regimens have been proposed to avoid or ameliorate calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity. These comprise the use of non-depleting or depleting antibodies for calcineurin inhibitor minimization, calcineurin inhibitor avoidance, or calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal from mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressant protocols. De novo use of a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (sirolimus or everolimus) or conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to an mTOR inhibitor may constitute another therapeutic option to avoid or reduce calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity. To date, complete calcineurin inhibitor avoidance seems to be inappropriate because other relatively potent immunosuppressant agents such as lymphocyte-depleting antibodies are needed for rejection prophylaxis, which are frequently accompanied by a higher incidence of infections and an unacceptably high acute rejection rate under calcineurin inhibitor avoidance. In some studies, calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in adult and pediatric kidney allograft recipients with stable or declining transplant function has been associated with an amelioration of renal function; however, this is attained at the cost of a higher acute rejection rate in 10-20% of patients. It has been frequently stressed that conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen to an mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppressant regimen should be performed early (e.g. 3 or 6 months post-transplant) in patients with well-preserved renal transplant function without significant proteinuria in order to prevent, or at least limit, calcineurin inhibitor-induced tissue damage and provide long-term benefit. It should be borne in mind though that the use of an mTOR inhibitor carries the risk of potential adverse events such as aggravation of proteinuria, hyperlipidemia, myelosuppression, and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism. Even though everolimus may be better tolerated than sirolimus, studies on everolimus for calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in the pediatric kidney transplant patient population are lacking. At present, the safest therapeutic strategy for pediatric renal allograft recipients with chronic calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity appears to be a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen with low-dose calcineurin inhibitor therapy and corticosteroids; available published data show that dual immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids, as well as an mTOR inhibitor plus mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroid-based regimens, are associated with an increased risk of acute rejection episodes. In individual patients with evidenced chronic allograft dysfunction and over-immunosuppression leading to recurrent infections, dual maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids may be appropriate. As stated in the annual report issued by the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies (NAPRTCS) Registry, currently the most popular immunosuppressant protocol consists of a calcineurin inhibitor combined with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids: 59.1% and 53.2% of patients with a functioning graft receive a calcineurin inhibitor plus mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroid-based immunosuppression at 1 and 5 years post-transplant, respectively. 91.4% and 87.8% of patients are administered a calcineurin inhibitor-containing regimen 1 and/or 5 years after transplantation, respectively. Undoubtedly, the use of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressant regimens with or without antibody induction, plus an mTOR inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil, requires more comprehensive long-term investigations to determine whether acceptable rejection rates and conservation of renal function can be achieved.

The anti-fibrotic effect of mycophenolic acid-induced neutral endopeptidase

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) appears to have anti-fibrotic effects, but the molecular mechanisms underlying this are unknown. We prospectively studied 35 stable kidney transplant recipients maintained on cyclosporine and azathioprine. We converted 20 patients from azathioprine to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) and continued the remaining 15 patients on azathioprine. Exploratory mRNA expression profiling, performed on five randomly selected EC-MPS patients, revealed significant upregulation of neutral endopeptidase (NEP), which is an enzyme that degrades angiotensin II. We confirmed these microarray data by measuring levels of NEP expression in all subjects; in addition, we found that NEP gene expression correlated inversely with proteinuria. In an additional 33 patients, glomerular and tubular NEP protein levels from renal graft biopsies were significantly higher among the 13 patients receiving cyclosporine + EC-MPS than among the 12 patients receiving cyclosporine + azathioprine or 8 patients receiving cyclosporine alone. Glomerular NEP expression inversely correlated with glomerulosclerosis and proteinuria, and tubular NEP expression inversely correlated with interstitial fibrosis. Incubation of human proximal tubular cells with MPA increased NEP gene expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Moreover, MPA reduced angiotensin II-induced expression of the profibrotic factor plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and a specific NEP inhibitor completely reversed this effect. Taken together, our data suggest that MPA directly induces expression of neutral endopeptidase, which may reduce proteinuria and slow the progression of renal damage in kidney transplant recipients.

Treatment strategies to minimize or prevent chronic allograft dysfunction in pediatric renal transplant recipients: an overview

Long-term allograft survival poses a major problem in pediatric renal transplantation, with allograft nephropathy being the principal cause of graft failure after the first post-transplant year. The mechanisms of nephron loss resulting in graft dysfunction are multiple, comprising both immunologic factors such as acute and chronic antibody- or T-cell-mediated rejection and non-immunologic components. The latter include peri-transplant injuries and renovascular lesions (renal artery stenosis, thrombosis) as well as cardiovascular risk factors such as arterial hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Another relevant issue leading to progressive nephron loss and declining kidney transplant function is acute and chronic nephrotoxicity induced by the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) ciclosporin (cyclosporine microemulsion) and tacrolimus. Furthermore, the presence of an abnormal lower urinary tract as well as bacterial (recurrent pyelonephritis) and viral (cytomegalovirus [CMV], polyomavirus [BK virus; BKV]) infections are crucial factors involved in the incidence of chronic allograft dysfunction and graft failure. Renovascular lesions and lower urinary tract obstruction are typical indicators for surgical intervention. The aim of treatment in pediatric patients with renal failure secondary to a dysfunctional lower urinary tract is to create a sterile, continent, and nonrefluxive reservoir. Surgical techniques such as bladder augmentation and the introduction of intermittent catheterization and anticholinergic therapy have significantly improved graft outcome. Arterial hypertension, another factor responsible for graft function deterioration in pediatric renal transplant recipients, is controlled preferably by the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor antagonists, which are known to possess nephroprotective properties in addition to their potent antihypertensive effects. Although treatment of subclinical rejection with augmented immunosuppression has been associated with better graft survival, an increase of the immunosuppressive level to avoid subclinical rejection should be weighed against the risk of infection. The majority of viral infections affecting kidney allografts are caused by CMV and BKV. Antiviral CMV prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy with ganciclovir has been shown to have beneficial effects in the pediatric renal transplant population. Treatment of BKV-induced nephropathy is based on reduction of the immunosuppressant therapy, although specific antiviral agents such as cidofovir and leflunomide are known to inhibit BKV. However, cidofovir itself is nephrotoxic and should therefore be administered cautiously to pediatric renal transplant patients. Since CNIs are likewise known for their nephrotoxic effects, especially with long-term use, alteration of the immunosuppressant regimen is necessary in case of deteriorating graft function due to CNI-induced histopathologic changes. Complete CNI avoidance seems inappropriate because, in this situation in pediatric renal transplant recipients, other relatively potent immunosuppressant agents such as lymphocyte-depleting antibodies, which are frequently accompanied by a higher incidence of infections, are needed for rejection prophylaxis. CNI withdrawal and switching of the immunosuppressant regimen from CNI therapy to sirolimus may be an option for some pediatric renal transplant patients with less advanced graft function deterioration. Nevertheless, potential adverse events such as aggravation of proteinuria, hyperlipidemia, myelosuppression, and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism have to be considered, and controlled studies are lacking. At present, an immunosuppressant maintenance therapy composed of low-dose tacrolimus or ciclosporin (CNI minimization) and mycophenolate mofetil with low-dose corticosteroids appears to be the most promising strategy to adopt in pediatric renal transplant recipients at low or normal immunologic risk.

Mycophenolate mofetil and calcineurin-inhibitor reduction: recent progress

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has greatly contributed to acute rejection rate reduction. Because of its immunosuppressive potency it was initially thought that MMF would help in reducing/avoiding CNI-related nephrotoxicity. Elective avoidance of CNI in induction and maintenance MMF-based immunosuppression has resulted in an increased risk for acute and chronic rejection. A recent meta-analysis suggests that CNI elimination in patients on MMF with progressive renal dysfunction is associated with a better outcome, although more data are needed to support any recommendation. So far, the more conservative approach involving CNI minimization with MMF has been associated with amelioration of renal function and low risk for rejection, providing an adequate risk/benefit balance. However, MMF with belatacept might pave the way for CNI-free induction and maintenance immunosuppression. Meanwhile, the assessment of immunological risk by new monitoring tools could be a prerequisite to further implement such CNI sparing strategies.

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppression early after renal transplantation: an interim analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the main cause of long-term renal transplant failure. Chronic use of calcineurin inhibitors contributes to its pathogenesis. Here, we report on a multicenter randomized trial to study the effects of withdrawal of cyclosporine A (CsA) from a triple immunosuppressive regimen containing CsA, prednisolone (P), and mycophenolate sodium (MPS) early after transplantation.

METHODS

Patients continued on P/CsA, P/MPS, or P and everolimus (EVL). Before withdrawal, a transplant biopsy was performed ensuring no subclinical rejection was present. Drug levels were closely monitored. The primary outcome was interstitial graft fibrosis and hyalinosis. Secondary outcome was among others graft rejection.

RESULTS

According to trial regulations, an interim analysis was performed after enrollment of half of the intended number of patients (n=113). Mean follow-up was 14+/-5 months from transplantation and 8+/-5 months from conversion. After conversion, acute rejection percentages were 3% in the P/CsA group, 22% in the P/MPS group, and 0% in the P/EVL group (P<0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that switching immunosuppressive therapy from P/CsA/MPS to therapy with P/CsA or P/EVL at 6 months after renal transplantation is effective in preventing rejection. Double therapy with P/MPS after withdrawal of P/CsA resulted in an increase in severe acute rejection episodes. These results were the immediate reason to halt the P/MPS arm. Serum creatinine values at the latest follow-up (8+/-5 months after conversion and 14+/-5 months after transplantation) in the P/EVL group were lower than in the P/CsA group.

Calcineurin inhibitor sparing with mycophenolate in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Limiting the exposure of kidney transplant recipients to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has potential merit, but there is no clear consensus on the utility of current strategies. In an attempt to aid clarification, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed CNI sparing (minimization or elimination) with mycophenolate as sole adjunctive immunosuppression.

METHODS

The search strategy identified trials where CNI sparing was accompanied by the continuation of, or conversion to, mycophenolate and compared with standard or higher dose CNI therapy. Two investigators independently examined each trial for eligibility, quality, and outcome measures. Additional subgroup analyses were assessed: (1) de novo CNI sparing; (2) elective CNI sparing beyond 2 months posttransplantation; and (3) CNI sparing for transplant dysfunction.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria permitting analysis of 3312 renal transplant recipients with median follow-up of 12 months. CNI sparing significantly improved glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference 4.4 mL/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-5.9, P<0.001); with some evidence, albeit weak, of improved graft survival (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P=0.06). Acute rejection rates were only increased after elective CNI elimination (odds ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.57-3.17, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality, malignancy or incidence of infections.

CONCLUSIONS

CNI sparing strategies with adjunctive mycophenolate may play an important role in kidney transplant recipients. Improvements in short-term graft function, and possibly graft survival, are achievable. Longer term studies are needed to substantiate the short-term benefits, and refining elective CNI elimination protocols may help to reduce the risk of rejection.

Mycophenolate mofetil: safety and efficacy in the prophylaxis of acute kidney transplantation rejection

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), is an inhibitor of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH). It preferentially inhibits denovo pathway of guanosine nucleotide synthesis in T and B-lymphocytes and prevents their proliferation, thereby suppresses both cell mediated and humoral immune responses. Clinical trials in kidney transplant recipients have shown the efficacy of MMF in reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes. It also improves long term graft function as well as graft and patient survival in kidney transplant recipients. MMF is useful as a component of toxicity sparing regimens to reduce or avoid exposure of steroids or calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) can be used as an alternative immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplant recipients with efficacy and safety profile similar to MMF.

Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppressive minimization and withdrawal strategies in renal transplantation: possible risks and benefits

The toxicity of standard triple-therapy immunosuppressive regimens has been identified as a possible factor in the failure to extend long-term renal allograft survival despite a continued decline of acute rejection rates. The result has been increasing focus on the use of mycophenolate mofetil-based, low-toxicity immunosuppressive regimens, which have been shown in randomized studies to have the potential to improve long-term graft survival. This Clinical Update discusses the likely risks and benefits for switching the immunosuppressive regimen in clinical practice.

[Immunosuppressive strategies and chronic graft dysfunction in kidney transplantation]

Chronic graft dysfunction is a major cause of return to dialysis. In the majority of cases, it is correlated with histological signs of cellular and/or humoral rejection, the nephrotoxicity of anticalcineurins, or nonspecific lesions of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Although the incidence of acute rejection has considerably decreased, renal toxicity of the calcineurin inhibitors remains problematic. In cases of established nephrotoxicity, the use of non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressors such as mycophenolic acid or the proliferation signal inhibitors makes it possible to reduce or even stop the anticalcineurins. In prevention of anticalcineurin nephrotoxicity, many attempts to minimize or wean patients from them have shown that improvement in renal function is only obtained at the cost of an increase in the incidence of acute rejection. This makes it necessary to select patients who may benefit from anticalcineurin-sparing treatment, based on clinical, histological, and biological markers. Finally, long-term follow-up is also fundamental in order to validate the positive impact on renal function of this strategy in terms of graft survival.

Prevention of calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity in renal transplantation

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (Csa) and tacrolimus (Tac) are now first intention immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplantation. However, although these treatments are effective for preventing allograft rejection, they are nephrotoxic: they can cause chronic renal dysfunction and degradation of renal graft function [Nankivell BJ, et al. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 11;349(24):2326-33]. In view of these undesirable effects, several strategies have been developed to minimize or even avoid their use. These strategies are reviewed and discussed in this paper.

Minimization of calcineurin inhibitors to improve long-term outcomes in kidney transplantation

Long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation remain suboptimal, despite the great achievements observed in recent years with the use of modern immunosuppressive drugs. Currently, the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine and tacrolimus remain the cornerstones of immunosuppressive regimens in many centers worldwide, regardless of their well described side-effects, including nephrotoxicity. In this article, we review recent CNI-minimization strategies in kidney transplantation, while emphasizing on the importance of long-term follow-up and patient monitoring. Finally, accumulating data indicate that low-dose CNI-based regimens would provide an interesting balance between efficacy and toxicity.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal after renal transplantation with alemtuzumab: clinical outcomes and effect on T-regulatory cells

To address the results of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal after alemtuzumab induction relative to CNI continuation, we performed a pilot randomized clinical trial in renal allograft recipients on CNI, a mycophenolic acid derivative and steroids after the first 2 months posttransplantation. Forty patients were randomized to taper off CNI or to maintain it, and followed for at least 1 year. Four patients in the withdrawal group were treated for acute rejection while no patient received antirejection treatment in the control group. Two control patients withdrew CNI due to nephrotoxicity. Estimated GFR was similar in both groups after 1 year. Flow cytometry of CD4(+)CD25(+)CTLA-4(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells (Treg) demonstrated a significant increase in Treg percentages in the peripheral blood of alemtuzumab-treated patients on CNI early postransplant. Furthermore, the increased Treg percentages in the withdrawal cohort were unchanged at month 6 postenrollment, whereas they decreased significantly in those patients maintained on CNI. Patients withdrawn from CNI after alemtuzumab trend toward a higher rejection rate, but most patients can be weaned from a CNI using this regimen. With the exception of maintaining increased Treg levels, the benefits are not appreciable in this short follow-up, and a larger randomized trial is justified.

Immunosuppressive strategies to improve outcomes of kidney transplantation

The introduction of several immunosuppressive agents over the past decade has reduced the rate of acute rejection significantly and has improved short-term renal allograft survival. However, their impact on long-term outcomes remains unclear. Current immunosuppressive strategies are focused on improving long-term graft and patient survival along with maintaining allograft function. The approval of the new immunosuppressive agents: rabbit antithymocyte globulin, basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and sirolimus, also has facilitated the development of steroid- and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimens in kidney transplantation. We discuss the impact of various immunosuppressive regimens on the outcome measures of kidney transplantation: acute rejection episodes, allograft survival, and renal function.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

The introduction of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) revolutionized kidney transplantation (KTx). Exceptionally low acute rejection rates and excellent graft survival could be achieved with CNI-based (cyclosporine and tacrolimus) immunosuppressive protocols. However, despite short-term success, long-term graft attrition continues to be a significant problem, thus leaving clinicians looking for possible interventions. CNI nephrotoxicity is but one of numerous factors that may be contributing to long-term damage in transplant kidneys. Therefore, newer immunosuppressive agents such as mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus (Rapa) have raised the possibility of withdrawing or avoiding CNIs altogether. Protocols exploring these options have gained greater attention over the last few years. Herein, we review studies addressing either CNI withdrawal or CNI avoidance strategies as well as discuss the risks versus benefits of these protocols. Given the accumulated experience to date, in our opinion, the use of CNIs as a part of immunosuppressive regimens remains the proven standard of care for renal transplant patients. The long-term safety and efficacy of CNI withdrawal and avoidance strategies need to be further validated in controlled clinical trials.

Maintenance immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids in pediatric kidney transplantation: temporary benefit but not without risk

BACKGROUND

Aiming at reducing cyclosporine toxicity, we investigated safety and efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an immunosuppressive drug in pediatric kidney transplantation compared with cyclosporine (CsA), both in combination with corticosteroids.

METHODS

One year after kidney transplantation, children on triple immunosuppression, having experienced no more than one, steroid-sensitive, acute rejection episode, were randomized to withdrawal of either CsA or MMF and were followed for 2 yr.

RESULTS

In each group, two patients had an acute rejection episode during withdrawal. Treatment failure occurred in 3 of 21 MMF and 5 of 23 CsA patients. Final analysis was for 18 patients in either group. A larger than 10 mL/min 1.73 m decrease in glomerular filtration rate was observed in more patients on CsA than on MMF (73% vs. 29%, P=0.019). No differences in blood pressure or nightly decrease of blood pressure were noted. Hypercholesterolism improved in the MMF (-16%), but not the CsA group (+5%, P<0.05), over the first, but not over both study years. Differences in triglycerid levels between groups were not shown. At study end, MMF patients tended to have lower hemoglobin levels than patients on CsA. Two MMF patients experienced a first acute rejection episode during the second study year, resulting in chronic transplant glomerulopathy with graft loss in one and deterioration of kidney function in the other.

CONCLUSION

In pediatric kidney transplantation, maintenance immunosuppression with MMF together with corticosteroids has short-term benefits for kidney function and lipid pattern compared with CsA but is not without risk of complications.

Antifibrotic actions of mycophenolic acid

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a highly selective, non-competitive and reversible inhibitor of the inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), the rate-limiting enzyme in the de novo biosynthesis of guanosine nucleotides. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, the ester prodrug of MPA) strongly inhibits both T- and B-lymphocyte proliferation and has now been widely used in the prevention of acute and chronic allograft rejection. Recent evidence, however, suggests that MMF is also capable of inhibiting the proliferation of non-immune cells. In various cell lines, e.g. smooth muscle cells, renal tubular cells, mesangial cells, and fibroblasts, MPA reduced or even abrogated proliferation in response to proliferative stimuli. In animal studies, MMF ameliorated renal lesions in immune-mediated disease, e.g. in the Anti-Thy 1.1 model and experimental lupus nephritis, but was also effective in non-immune-mediated renal damage, e.g. in the rat remnant kidney model or in a model of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity in the rat. In humans, MMF reduced proteinuria in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome and had beneficial effects in the prevention and treatment of chronic allograft nephropathy and calcineurin inhibitor toxicity through the reduction of immune- and non-immune-mediated renal damage. MMF is well tolerated and has proven to be a relatively safe drug. Taken together, there is a growing body of evidence pointing to therapeutic applications of MMF other than immunosuppression, in particular the prevention of fibrosis.

Cyclosporine sparing with mycophenolate mofetil, daclizumab and corticosteroids in renal allograft recipients: the CAESAR Study

Although the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus are highly effective immunosuppressants, they are associated with serious side effects. There is great interest in immunosuppressive regimens that permit reduction or elimination of CNIs, while maintaining adequate immunosuppression and acceptable acute rejection rates. Patients (n = 536) receiving their first renal allograft were randomized to one of three immunosuppressant regimens: daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids (CS) and low-dose CsA (target trough levels of 50-100 ng/mL), weaned from month 4 and withdrawn by month 6; daclizumab, MMF, CS and low-dose CsA; or MMF, CS and standard-dose CsA. Mean GFR 12 months after transplantation (primary end point) was not statistically different in the CsA withdrawal and low-dose CsA groups (both 50.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) vs. the standard-dose CsA group (48.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). At 12 months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was significantly higher in the CsA withdrawal group (38%) vs. the low- or standard-dose CsA groups (25.4% and 27.5%, respectively; p < 0.05). In summary, a regimen of continuous low-dose CsA with MMF, CS and daclizumab induction is a clinically safe and effective immunosuppressive regimen in renal transplant recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil is associated with altered expression of chronic renal transplant histology

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduces acute rejection in controlled trials of kidney transplantation and is associated with better registry graft survival. Recent experimental studies have demonstrated additional antifibrotic properties of MMF, however, human histological data are lacking. We evaluated sequential prospective protocol kidney biopsies from two historical cohorts treated with cyclosporine (CSA)-based triple therapy including prednisolone and either MMF (n = 25) or azathioprine (AZA, n = 25). Biopsies (n = 360) were taken from euglycemic kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. Histology was independently assessed by the Banff schema and electron microscopic morphometry. MMF reduced acute rejection and OKT3 use (p < 0.05) compared with AZA. MMF therapy was associated with limited chronic interstitial fibrosis, striped fibrosis and periglomerular fibrosis (p < 0.05-0.001), mesangial matrix accumulation (p < 0.01), chronic glomerulopathy scores (p < 0.05) and glomerulosclerosis (p < 0.05). MMF was associated with delayed expression of CSA nephrotoxicity, reduced arteriolar hyalinosis, striped fibrosis and tubular microcalcification (p < 0.05-0.001). The beneficial effects of MMF remained in recipients without acute rejection. Retrospective analysis shows that MMF therapy was associated with substantially reduced fibrosis in the glomerular, microvascular and interstitial compartments, and a delayed expression of CSA nephrotoxicity. These outcomes may be due to a limitation of immune-mediated injury and suggest a direct effect of reduced fibrogenesis.

Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus for chronic renal allograft dysfunction: a systematic review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus has been used as a strategy to improve deteriorating renal allograft function but the efficacy and safety of this intervention is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies that involved conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus in kidney transplantation. The search yielded five randomized trials (n=1,040 patients) and 25 nonrandomized studies (n=977 patients).

RESULTS

In the randomized trials, conversion to sirolimus improved short-term creatinine clearance (weighted mean difference 6.4 mL/min; 95% CI 1.9 to 11.0) compared to controls. In the nonrandomized studies, renal function improved or stabilized in 66% (95% CI 61% to 72%), creatinine clearance improved (weighted mean change 5.7 mL/min; 95% CI 1.4 to 10.1), cholesterol increased (weighted mean change 20.8 mg/dL; 95% CI 11.2 to 30.4) and triglycerides increased (weighted mean change 40.1 mg/dL; 95% CI 18.6 to 61.7). Sirolimus was discontinued by 28% of patients (95% CI 0 to 59%) in the randomized trials and 17% (95% CI 12 to 22%) in the nonrandomized trials.

CONCLUSION

Conversion to sirolimus is associated with an improvement in short-term renal function. However, given the discontinuation rate and potential side effects, adequately powered randomized trials with longer follow-up of hard outcomes are needed to determine whether this strategy leads to a lasting benefit in the clinical care of transplant recipients.

Developing a tool for noninvasive monitoring of renal allografts

Renal transplantation has emerged as the therapy of choice for many patients with end-stage renal disease. One of the major goals is to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the individual needs of every patient at every time point post transplant, balancing the risk for rejection and over-immunosuppression. Such individualized treatment will require assays that can detect harmful processes in the allograft early and that can be measured repeatedly. In this review, advantages and disadvantages of current assays to monitor renal allografts noninvasively and how proteomic technology might contribute to the development of novel biomarkers to improve patient management will be discussed.

Sympathetic nerve activity in renal transplant patients before and after withdrawal of cyclosporine

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that the increase in blood pressure observed in transplant patients treated with cyclosporine is mediated by cyclosporine-induced sympathoexcitation. However, the chronic effects of cyclosporine on sympathetic outflow in renal transplant patients have not been investigated. Therefore we studied sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure before and 6 months after the withdrawal of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four renal transplant patients with histologically confirmed chronic allograft nephropathy (age 48 +/- 3 years, 60 +/- 10 months after transplantation) were included in the prospective study and randomly assigned to either withdrawal (n = 12) or continuation (n = 12) of cyclosporine. Both groups received mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone as additional immunosuppressants. At entry and 6 months later blood pressure, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), and plasma norepinephrine were measured. To assess the potential influence of the diseased native kidneys, three renal transplant patients who had their native kidneys removed were studied before and after cyclosporine withdrawal.

RESULTS

Mean arterial pressure decreased significantly in the cyclosporine-withdrawal group (95 +/- 4 versus 105 +/- 4 mmHg 6 versus 0 months, P < 0.05) but not in the cyclosporine-continuation group (103 +/- 3 versus 105 +/- 4 mmHg, NS). However, plasma norepinephrine and MSNA did not change significantly in either group (MSNA 43 +/- 4 versus 44 +/- 3 and 38 +/- 5 versus 39 +/- 4 bursts/min in the cyclosporine-withdrawal and cyclosporine-continuation groups, NS). Graft function remained stable in both groups and in transplant patients who had their native kidneys removed MSNA did not decrease after cyclosporine withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

The withdrawal of cyclosporine in renal transplant patients, receiving relatively low doses of cyclosporine, resulted in a substantial decrease in blood pressure. However, MSNA and norepinephrine did not change. This suggests that cyclosporine treatment does not cause chronic sympathetic activation that could explain the cyclosporine-induced blood pressure elevation in renal transplant patients.

Assessment of the risk of chronic allograft dysfunction after renal transplantation in a randomized cyclosporine withdrawal trial

BACKGROUND

We report the two-year follow-up of a trial comparing the three-month postgraft discontinuation of either cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) from a triple-drug regimen after de novo renal transplantation.

METHODS

One hundred and eight patients were enrolled in this study and randomized to be withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n=54) or MMF (CsA group, n=54).

RESULTS

Despite an increased risk of acute rejection and a lower, but nonsignificant, two-year graft survival, CsA withdrawal induced a sustained improvement of the renal function. At one year, the chronic allograft damage index was similar in both the MMF and CsA groups. However, CsA elimination resulted in a higher incidence of C4d deposits, irrespective of the occurrence of a prior acute rejection. While this finding could suggest a risk of chronic rejection in the MMF group, the outcome did not appear to be related to the C4d status. Moreover, logistic regression analysis showed that only two factors, acute rejection and the one-year glomerular filtration rate level, were predictive of a significant decline of the renal function at two years.

CONCLUSIONS

These results point out the need to secure the minimization of the calcineurin inhibitors after renal transplantation, in order to reduce the risk of acute rejection in these patients, because this strategy allows the improvement of the one-year renal function which is predictive of a chronic allograft dysfunction.

Maintenance immunosuppression regimens: conversion, minimization, withdrawal, and avoidance

A wide choice of drug combinations is available to clinicians for immunosuppression regimens for their kidney transplant patients. Although many protocols have minimized early graft loss, the optimal long-term regimen is unknown. Recent studies clearly showed that cardiovascular death is now the leading cause of graft loss. Strategies must be developed that address this risk while keeping immunologic events low. Transplant physicians have focused on exploring regimens that minimize or avoid the use of corticosteroids. Studies also have started to explore protocols that minimize calcineurin inhibitor therapy.

Treatment strategies in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity

Although short-term kidney allograft survival has improved significantly since the introduction of the calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus, long-term transplant survival remains a major concern, chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) being the principal reason for graft loss after the first post-transplant year. This is particularly major for pediatric renal transplant recipients because of their higher life expectancy compared with adults. The mechanisms leading to CAN are multiple, including acute and chronic alloimmune responses and nephrotoxicity of CNIs. CNI-induced nephrotoxicity is also a long-term concern in other pediatric solid organ transplant recipients, such as liver and heart. Prevention of allograft nephropathy requires a balance of maintaining adequate immunosuppression, while avoiding the toxic effects of CNIs. Regimens that are based on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) alone or in combination with newer agents may allow for reduced reliance on CNIs and thus may represent an effective treatment paradigm for long-term maintenance of a renal allograft. From the available data it appears that the currently safest treatment strategy in pediatric renal and heart transplant recipients with CNI toxicity is an MMF-based therapy with low-dose CNIs +/- low-dose steroids, while in pediatric liver transplant recipients, CNI-free MMF-based immunosuppressive therapy with or without steroids appears feasible in a significant subset of patients. In renal transplant recipients, the benefit of a CNI-free MMF/steroid therapy on renal function is gained at the cost of increased rejection in a subset of patients, although the relative importance of rejection vs. overall renal function requires further clinical investigation. The introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors provides an opportunity for unique CNI-sparing regimens that combine two antiproliferative agents (MMF and TOR inhibitors). It is possible that a sirolimus-based CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen in terms of renal transplant survival is superior to CNI minimization, where the detrimental effects of CNIs on allograft function and structure are still operative, albeit to a lesser degree. Substitution of CNIs by mTOR inhibitors is therefore promising, but requires validation in long-term studies in large cohorts.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance with Daclizumab, Mycophenolate Mofetil, and Prednisolone in DR-Matched de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimens posttransplantation have been claimed to conserve graft function in addition to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular and malignant disease in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

The primary aim of this prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study was to compare the effect of complete CNI-avoidance posttransplant (daclizumab + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: Dac-group, n=27) with the standard CNI-based immunosuppressive protocol at our transplant unit (cyclosporine A + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: CsA-group, n=27) on renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] determined as plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA) in a selected low immunogenic risk population (DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients).

RESULTS

There were no significant difference in GFR at week 10 (P=0.61), but GFR was significantly (P=0.029) lower in the Dac-group (52+/-20 ml/min) at month 12 than in the CsA-group (69+/-29 ml/min). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between the two groups. Overall acute rejection rate was 70.4% (19/27) in the Dac-group and 29.6% (8/27) in the CsA-group (P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy to select DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients for a CNI-avoidance protocol was not successful. The incidence of acute rejection was unacceptable high even though anti-CD25 antibody induction as well as initial higher mycophenolate mofetil doses (3 g/day) were applied, and renal function was significantly lower in the CNI-avoidance patients at 1 year. Other strategies need to be examined for avoidance of CNI's in the early posttransplant period.

Toxicity-sparing protocols using mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplantation

The introduction of triple-therapy regimens that include a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), steroids, and azathioprine greatly reduced the risk of acute rejection in renal transplantation. However, the long-term use of both CNIs and steroids is associated with serious toxicities that ultimately can impact patient/graft survival. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), a highly effective immunosuppressant with no known nephrotoxicity, has been shown to provide benefits in preserving long-term renal allograft function relative to azathioprine. For these reasons, MMF has become an integral component of toxicity-sparing maintenance regimens that seek to minimize patient exposure to CNIs and steroids. This paper provides an overview of current strategies for reducing the toxicities associated with these agents, which include both withdrawal and avoidance regimens with or without induction therapy. Data are accumulating that toxicity-sparing regimens involving MMF are safe and decrease the risk of side effects that accompany the use of CNIs and steroids. Future studies will determine how to best implement these regimens in the renal transplant population.

Conversion from Cyclosporine to Sirolimus in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) has mainly been done in clinical conditions warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation. Little is known about the clinical outcome of conversion in renal transplant recipients without transplant dysfunction.

METHODS

This prospective, open-label, multicentric pilot study evaluates the safety and efficacy of converting patients with stable renal function from CsA to SRL.

RESULTS

Forty stable patients on CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1.5 g/day), and steroids (ST) were converted at 7.6+/-1.4 months after renal transplantation. At 1 year, graft and patient survival was 100% and the incidence of acute rejection 5%. Calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) increased from 54+/-18 to 66+/-16 ml/min (P<0.0001). Blood pressure remained unchanged. A gradual increase in the incidence and severity of proteinuria was observed from month 6 onwards with de novo proteinuria in 30% of the patients at 1 year. Protein excretion was below 1 g/day in 12.5%, between 1 and 3 g/day in 17.5% and above 3 g/day in 7.5% of the proteinuric cohort (P=0.0043, compared to baseline). No predictors could be identified for the development of proteinuria. All patients had a reduction in protein excretion following renin-angiotensin blockade and were continued on SRL.

CONCLUSION

Conversion of stable renal transplant recipients from a CsA-MMF-ST to a SRL-MMF-ST regimen is safe and results in improved renal function but is associated with the development of proteinuria in 30% of the patients requiring renin-angiotensin blockade.

What we CAN do about chronic allograft nephropathy: Role of immunosuppressive modulations

Given the potency of modern immunosuppressive agents, kidney transplantation across alloantingen barriers is a routine phenomenon with excellent 1-year graft survival in most centers. However, the improvement in 1-year graft survival has not been matched by improvements in long-term graft function and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time. Calcineurin inhibitors, namely cyclosporine A (CyA) and tacrolimus, have been implicated as causal agents in the development of the fibrotic processes that are the hallmarks of CAN. Many studies have, therefore, concentrated on the improvement of long term graft function through the modulation of immunosuppressive therapy. It is the purpose of this review to describe and appraise the available evidence for the prevention and management of CAN through modulation of immunosuppressive agents.

Screening to prevent polyoma virus nephropathy: a medical decision analysis

Polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) is an emerging medical dilemma in kidney transplantation. Methods to screen before clinical disease are available and early immunosuppression reduction may change the natural history of progression. However, the consequences of an increase in rejection may limit the benefits. In a simulation model a 'screen' versus 'no-screen' strategy was compared. Baseline PVN cumulative incidence was assumed to be 4%. Patients with PVN were modeled to have 4-fold higher risk of graft loss. In the screen strategy, patients positive for blood DNA PCR had their immunosuppression reduced. This pre-emptive change was modeled to reduce progression to overt PVN by 80%. Therapy reduction was associated with a 10% risk of precipitating acute rejection and greater risk of chronic allograft loss. In the baseline case, screening saved 1912 dollars (discounted) and produced 0.020 more quality adjusted life years (QALYs) than not screening. Screening resulted in decreased net QALYs if the false positive viremia rate was >9.5% and the PVN incidence was <2.1%. Much of the cost savings of screening relate to savings from immunosuppression reduction in the screened arm. Screening may well be cost-effective if not cost saving in centers with high PVN rates. There remain significant areas of uncertainty.

A randomized controlled trial of late conversion from CNI-based to sirolimus-based immunosuppression following renal transplantation

Maintenance immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) following renal transplantation is associated with nephrotoxicity and accelerated graft loss. We aimed to assess whether conversion to sirolimus-based immunosuppression would affect the progression of renal impairment. In this single center, randomized controlled trial, 40 renal transplant recipients between 6 months and 8 years post-transplant were randomly assigned to remain on their CNI (cyclosporin or tacrolimus) or to switch to sirolimus. The primary outcome measure was change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurement at 12 months. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Of the 40 patients randomized, 2 patients never took the study drugs and were excluded, leaving 19 patients per group. There was a significant change in GFR at 12 months following conversion to sirolimus (12.9 mL/min, 95% CI 6.1-19.7; p < 0.001). Following conversion, the principal adverse events were the development of rashes (68%), particularly acne, and mouth ulcers (32%). No patient in either group experienced an acute rejection episode. In renal transplant recipients, a change in maintenance therapy from CNIs to sirolimus is associated with significant improvement in GFR at 12 months.

2005 immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplantation: which role for the calcineurin inhibitors?

The calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine and tacrolimus have been the cornerstones of immunosuppressive strategies in clinical transplantation. Currently, regimens that are most widely used for induction and maintenance therapy include CNIs. However, many clinical trials aiming at reducing or eliminating CNIs have been performed in recent years. Here, we review and discuss current and future immunosuppressive strategies with a special emphasis on the role of CNIs, in the light of recent studies in the field of kidney transplantation. In the current era, CNIs still play an important role.

Strategies for minimizing immunosuppression in kidney transplantation

Immunosuppression remains the cause of most morbidity following organ transplantation. However, its use is also responsible for the outstanding graft and patient survival rates commonplace in modern transplantation. Thus, the predominant challenge for transplant clinicians is to provide a level of immunosuppression that prevents graft rejection while preserving immunocompetence against environmental pathogens. This review will outline several strategies for minimizing or tailoring the use of immunosuppressive drugs. The arguments for various strategies will be based on clinical trial data rather than animal studies. A distinction will be made between conventional immunosuppressive drug reduction based on over-immunosuppression, and newer induction methods specifically designed to lessen the need for chronic immunosuppression. Based on the available data we suggest that most patients can be transplanted with less immunosuppression than is currently standard.

Predictive factors of acute rejection after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients who receive mycophenolate mofetil: results from a prospective, randomized trial

The aim of this randomized, open-labeled trial was to compare the incidence of acute rejection after an early (3 mo posttransplantation) withdrawal of cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplantation. Among 218 eligible recipients, 108 nonsensitized, rejection-free patients who were under a triple drug regimen (CsA-MMF-prednisone) and had received a first kidney from a deceased donor were enrolled. At 3 mo after graft, they were gradually withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n = 54) or MMF (CsA group, n = 54). A graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of CsA and mycophenolic acid were systematically performed before the randomization. At 1 yr, graft and patient survival rates were 100% in each group. Renal function was improved in the MMF group compared with the CsA group (Cockcroft calculated clearance 64.7 +/- 18.7 versus 56.5 +/- 18.0 ml/min; P = 0.023). However, the probability of acute rejection was higher in the MMF group (18.5 versus 5.6%; P = 0.045). The 10 patients who developed acute rejection after CsA withdrawal had a significantly higher incidence of borderline changes on the randomization biopsy than the 44 rejection-free patients (five of 10 versus eight of 44; P = 0.034), and they displayed a lower area under the curve of mycophenolic acid (43 +/- 9 versus 58 +/- 22 mg/h per L; P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis confirmed that borderline changes and area under the curve of mycophenolic acid were significant risk factors of acute rejection after CsA discontinuation. It is concluded that a systematic graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolic acid are needed to reduce the risk for acute rejection after CsA withdrawal.