[An analysis of the peptide composition of a 'light' peptide fraction of cerebrolysin]

[Antioxidant effect of cortexin, cerebrolysin and actovegin in rats with chronic cerebrovascular insufficiency]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antioxidant effects of cortexin, cerebrolysin and actovegin in rats with chronic brain ischemia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Chronic brain ischemia was modeled in male rats by 50% stenosis of the common carotid arteries. Forty days after surgery, the animals received 2 ten-day courses of therapy, separated by a break of 10 days. Placebo, cortexin (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg), cerebrolysin (0.8, 2.5 and 7.5 ml/kg) and actovegin (5 ml/kg) were administered to animals as treatment. The concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA) in the homogenates was determined by the reaction with thiobarbituric acid, the concentration of reduced glutathione was determined by the reduction reaction of 5.5-dithiobis- (2-nitrobenzoic acid); determination of catalase activity, as well as the content of lactate and pyruvate, by commercially available reagent kits. The activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) was determined by the photometric method based on an assessment of the degree of inhibition of the epinephrine oxidation reaction. All reactions were carried out in triplicates.

RESULTS

Modeling of chronic brain ischemia led to the statistically significant decrease in the content of lactate and pyruvate (p<0.001, when compared with the control group), which was not accompanied by a significant decrease in their ratio (p>0.05), as well as to the decrease in SOD, catalase activity, restored glutathione and increase in MDA concentrations. Compared with the control group, in the groups that received cortexin at a dose of 3 mg/kg/day, cerebrolysin at a dose of 7.5 ml/kg/day and actovegin at a dose of 5 ml/kg/day, there were an increase in the content of lactate and pyruvate (without a significant change in their ratio), restoration of glutathione levels and the activity of SOD and, to a lesser extent, catalase, combined with a decrease in the concentration of MDA.

CONCLUSION

Course administration of cortexin (3 mg/kg), cerebrolysin (7.5 ml/kg) and, to a lesser extent, actovegin (5 ml/kg) has a positive effect on the state of the antioxidant system of the brain in rats with chronic brain ischemia.

Neuroprotective action of Cortexin, Cerebrolysin and Actovegin in acute or chronic brain ischemia in rats

This study was the first to compare the neuroprotective activity of Cerebrolysin®, Actovegin® and Cortexin® in rodent models of acute and chronic brain ischemia. The neuroprotective action was evaluated in animals with acute (middle cerebral artery occlusion) or chronic (common carotid artery stenosis) brain ischemia models in male rats. Cortexin® (1 or 3 mg/kg/day), Cerebrolysin® (538 or 1614 mg/kg/day) and Actovegin® (200 mg/kg/day) were administered for 10 days. To assess the neurological and motor impairments, open field test, adhesive removal test, rotarod performance test and Morris water maze test were performed. Brain damage was assessed macro- and microscopically, and antioxidant system activity was measured in brain homogenates. In separate experiments in vitro binding of Cortexin® to a wide panel of receptors was assessed, and blood-brain barrier permeability of Cortexin® was assessed in mice in vivo. Cortexin® or Cerebrolysin® and, to a lesser extent, Actovegin® improved the recovery of neurological functions, reduced the severity of sensorimotor and cognitive impairments in rats. Cortexin® reduced the size of necrosis of brain tissue in acute ischemia, improved functioning of the antioxidant system and prevented the development of severe neurodegenerative changes in chronic ischemia model. Radioactively labeled Cortexin® crossed the blood-brain barrier in mice in vivo with concentrations equal to 6-8% of concentrations found in whole blood. During in vitro binding assay Cortexin® (10 μg/ml) demonstrated high or moderate binding to AMPA-receptors (80.1%), kainate receptors (73.5%), mGluR1 (49.0%), GABAA1 (44.0%) and mGluR5 (39.7%), which means that effects observed in vivo could be related on the glutamatergic and GABAergic actions of Cortexin®. Thus, Cortexin, 1 or 3 mg/kg, or Cerebrolysin®, 538 or 1614 mg/kg, were effective in models acute and chronic brain ischemia in rats. Cortexin® contains compounds acting on AMPA, kainate, mGluR1, GABAA1 and mGluR5 receptors in vitro, and readily crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice.

[The criteria for effectiveness of reperfusion therapy and neuroprotective therapy in ischemic stroke]

The narrative review discusses the data on efficacy and safety of reperfusion therapy (RT) and neuroprotective therapy in ischemic stroke. The influence of therapy on mortality, residual neurologic deficit and disability is analyzed. It was shown that RT (thrombolysis or mechanical thromboextraction) leads to significant decrease of residual neurologic deficit or disability. The influence of RT on mortality is controversial. There is some evidence that RT can increase early mortality due to hemorrhagic complications. Neuroprotective therapy is much less studied in stroke but is recognized as safe. Neuroprotective therapy (i.e. cerebrolysin) can diminish residual neurologic deficit and disability, while it has no influence on mortality.

Cerebrolysin in the therapy of mild cognitive impairment and dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: 30 years of clinical use

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurocognitive disorder and a global health problem. The prevalence of AD is growing dramatically, especially in low- and middle-income countries, and will reach 131.5 million cases worldwide by 2050. Therefore, developing a disease-modifying therapy capable of delaying or even preventing the onset and progression of AD has become a world priority, and is an unmet need. The pathogenesis of AD, considered as the result of an imbalance between resilience and risk factors, begins many years before the typical clinical picture develops and involves multiple pathophysiological mechanisms. Since the pathophysiology of AD is multifactorial, it is not surprising that all attempts done to modify the disease course with drugs directed towards a single therapeutic target have been unsuccessful. Thus, combined modality therapy, using multiple drugs with a single mechanism of action or multi-target drugs, appears as the most promising strategy for both effective AD therapy and prevention. Cerebrolysin, acting as a multitarget peptidergic drug with a neurotrophic mode of action, exerts long-lasting therapeutic effects on AD that could reflect its potential utility for disease modification. Clinical trials demonstrated that Cerebrolysin is safe and efficacious in the treatment of AD, and may enhance and prolong the efficacy of cholinergic drugs, particularly in moderate to advanced AD patients. In this review, we summarize advances of therapeutic relevance in the pathogenesis and the biomarkers of AD, paying special attention to neurotrophic factors, and present results of preclinical and clinical investigations with Cerebrolysin in AD.

[Cerebrolysin peptides as mood stabilizers]

AIM

To establish the molecular mechanisms of the mood stabilizing (normothymic) action of the neuroprotector Cerebrolysin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Mass-spectrometric analysis of the peptide composition of cerebrolysin followed by a complex bioinformatics analysis was utilized.

RESULTS

Cerebrolysin contains considerable amounts of Leu- and Met-enkephalins, partial analogues of enkephalins, peptide fragments of beta-lipotropin. These peptides stimulate the endorphinergic system thus contributing to normothymic action and an increase in the levels of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Specific inhibition of kinases ABL1, PINK1, CDK5 and arginine N-methyltransferase PRMT5 by the peptides of cerebrolysin has a multidirectional effect on the dopaminergic system, also helping to stabilize mood. Cerebrolysin peptides do not directly affect neither the serotonergic, adrenergic, nor GABAergic systems.

CONCLUSION

The normothymic effect of Cerebrolysin is due to the stabilization of endorphinergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission.