[Paradoxical air embolism resulted in acute myocardial infarction and massive ischemic brain injury in a patient operated on in a sitting position]

Pure endoscopic resection of pineal region tumors through supracerebellar infratentorial approach with 'head-up' park-bench position

OBJECTIVE

Neuroendoscopic resection via supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) approach is adequate for some indicated pineal region tumors with the natural infratentorial corridor. We described this full endoscopic approach through a modified 'head-up' park-bench position to facilitate the procedure.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical and radiological data of four patients with pineal region lesions who underwent pure endoscopic tumor resection through the SCIT approach with this modified position. The related literature concerning fully endoscopic pineal region tumor resection was also reviewed.

RESULTS

This cohort included four patients with pineal region tumors. External ventricular drainage (Ommaya reservoir) was performed in three patients with hydrocephalus in advance. The average tumor volume was 19.2 ± 17.2 cm³. Pathological examination confirmed two mixed germinomas, one glioblastoma multiforme, and one hemangioblastoma. Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in all patients, and all patients recovered well without neurological deficits or surgical complications. Hydrocephalus was relieved among all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The pure endoscopic SCIT approach could enable safe and effective resection of pineal region tumors, even for relatively large lesions. The endoscope could provide a panoramic view and illumination of the deep-seated structures. Compared with the sitting position, this modified ergonomic position could be implemented easily.

The Effects of Patient Positioning on the Outcome During Posterior Cranial Fossa and Pineal Region Surgery

Background: Surgery on posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and pineal region (PR) carries the risks of intraoperative trauma to the brainstem structures, blood loss, venous air embolism (VAE), cardiovascular instability, and other complications. Success in surgery, among other factors, depends on selecting the optimal patient position. Our objective was to find associations between patient positioning, incidence of intraoperative complications, neurological recovery, and the extent of surgery.

Methods: This observational study was conducted in two medical centers: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) and The Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Russian Federation). Patients were distributed in two groups based on the surgical position: sitting position (SP) or horizontal position (HP). The inclusion criteria were adult patients with space-occupying or vascular lesions requiring an open PCF or PR surgery. Perioperative variables were recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics. The post-treatment survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months.

Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the study: 53 in SP and 56 in HP. A higher proportion of patients in the HP patients had >300 mL intraoperative blood loss compared to the SP group (32 vs. 13%; p = 0.0250). Intraoperative VAE was diagnosed in 40% of SP patients vs. 0% in the HP group (p < 0.0001). However, trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring was more common in the SP group. Intraoperative hypotension was documented in 28% of SP patients compared to 9% in HP group (p = 0.0126). A higher proportion of SP patients experienced a new neurological symptom compared to the HP group (49 vs. 29%; p = 0.0281). The extent of tumor resection, postoperative 3-months survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were not different in the groups.

Conclusions: The SP was associated with, less intraoperative bleeding, increased intraoperative hypotension, VAE, and postoperative neurological deficit. More HP patients experienced macroglossia and increased blood loss. At 3 months, there was no difference of parameters between the two groups.

Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: registration number NCT03364283.