Efficacy of a bundle approach in preventing the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP)

Effect of fourth hourly oropharyngeal suctioning on ventilator-associated events in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in intensive care units of a tertiary care center in South India: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a necessary life-saving measure for critically ill patients. Ventilator-associated events (VAEs) are potentially avoidable complications associated with MV that can double the rate of death. Oral care and oropharyngeal suctioning, although neglected procedures, play a vital role in the prevention of VAE.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the intensive care units to compare the effect of fourth hourly oropharyngeal suctioning with the standard oral care protocol on VAE among patients on MV. One hundred twenty mechanically ventilated patients who were freshly intubated and expected to be on ventilator support for the next 72 hours were randomly allocated to the control or intervention groups. The intervention was fourth hourly oropharyngeal suctioning along with the standard oral care procedure. The control group received standard oral care (i.e., thrice a day) and on-demand oral suctioning. On the 3rd and 7th days following the intervention, endotracheal aspirates were sent to rule out ventilator-associated pneumonia.

RESULTS

Both groups were homogenous at baseline with respect to their clinical characteristics. The intervention group had fewer VAEs (56.7%) than the control group (78.3%) which was significant at P<0.01. A significant reduction in the status of "positive culture" on ET aspirate also been observed following the 3rd day of the intervention (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

One of the most basic preventive strategies is providing oral care. Oropharyngeal suctioning is also an important component of oral care that prevents microaspiration. Hence, fourth-hourly oropharyngeal suctioning with standard oral care significantly reduces the incidence of VAE.

Prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia through care bundles: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) represents a common hospital-acquired infection among mechanically ventilated patients. We summarized evidence concerning ventilator care bundles to prevent VAP.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Randomized controlled trials and controlled observational studies of adults undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV) for at least 48 h were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest were the number of VAP episodes, duration of MV, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and mortality. A systematic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science between 1985 and 2022. Results are reported as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022341780.

Results

Thirty-six studies including 116,873 MV participants met the inclusion criteria. A total of 84,031 participants underwent care bundles for VAP prevention. The most reported component of the ventilator bundle was head-of-bed elevation (n=83,146), followed by oral care (n=80,787). A reduction in the number of VAP episodes was observed among those receiving ventilator care bundles, compared with the non-care bundle group (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.33, 0.54). Additionally, the implementation of care bundles decreased the duration of MV (MD=-0.59, 95% CI: -1.03, -0.15) and hospital length of stay (MD=-1.24, 95% CI: -2.30, -0.18) in studies where educational activities were part of the bundle. Data regarding mortality were inconclusive.

Conclusions

The implementation of ventilator care bundles reduced the number of VAP episodes and the duration of MV in adult ICUs. Their application in combination with educational activities seemed to improve clinical outcomes.

Influence of oral comprehensive nursing intervention on mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: a randimized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of oral comprehensive nursing intervention on mechanically ventilated patients in ICU.

METHODS

Select 76 cases of mechanically ventilated patients in severe ICU admitted to our hospital from January 2022 to October 2022 as the research objects, and divide them into the control group and the observation group according to the way the patients receive oral care. 38 cases each. The patients in the control group received routine nursing intervention, and the patients in the observation group received comprehensive oral nursing intervention on the basis of the nursing of the control group. The clinical index data, oropharyngeal hygiene, pH value, blood gas analysis index levels, and the occurrence and death of ventilator-associated pneumonia were compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The hospitalization time of the two groups was compared (P > 0.05); the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stay time of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (all, P < 0.05); the oral odor scores, The plaque index and soft scale index were significantly lower than those of the control group (all, P < 0.05); the pH value, PaO 2 value, and SpO 2 value of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the PaCO 2 value was significantly higher than that of the control group. group (all, P < 0.05); the incidence of VAP in the control group was 55.26%, and the mortality rate was 15.79%, the incidence rate of VAP in the observation group was 21.05%, and the mortality rate was 2.63%, and the incidence rate and mortality rate of VAP in the observation group were significantly lower in the control group (all, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The application of nursing intervention can effectively promote the recovery of patients, improve the hygiene of patients' oropharynx, adjust the levels of pH and blood gas-related indicators in patients, and reduce VAP in patients. risk of morbidity and mortality.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the intensive care unit

High resistance rates to antimicrobials continue to be a global health threat. The incidence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms in intensive care units (ICUs) is quite high compared to in the community and other units in the hospital because ICU patients are generally older, have higher numbers of co-morbidities and immune-suppressed; moreover, the typically high rates of invasive procedures performed in the ICU increase the risk of infection by MDR microorganisms. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) refers to the implementation of coordinated interventions to improve and track the appropriate use of antibiotics while offering the best possible antibiotic prescription (according to dose, duration, and route of administration). Broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently preferred in ICUs because of greater infection severity and colonization and infection by MDR microorganisms. For this reason, a number of studies on AMS in ICUs have increased in recent years. Reducing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics forms the basis of AMS. For this purpose, parameters such as establishing an AMS team, limiting the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, terminating treatments early, using early warning systems, pursuing infection control, and providing education and feedback are used. In this review, current AMS practices in ICUs are discussed.

Bundle management strategy in reducing hospital-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients with mental disorders

Introduction

The incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is high in the medical setting for mental disorders. To date, effective measurements for preventing HAP in hospitalized mental disorder patients are unavailable.

Methods

This study was conducted at the Large-Scale Mental Health Center of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China) in two phases: baseline phase (January 2017-December 2019) and intervention phase (May 2020-April 2022). In the intervention phase, the HAP bundle management strategy was implemented in the Mental Health Center, and the data on HAP were collected continuously for analysis.

Results

A total of 18,795 and 9,618 patients were included in the baseline and intervention phases, respectively. The age, gender, ward admitted to, type of mental disorder, and Charlson comorbidity index did not differ significantly. After intervention, the rate of HAP occurrence decreased from 0.95 to 0.52% (P < 0.001). Specifically, the HAP rate decreased from 1.70 to 0.95% (P = 0.007) in the closed ward and from 0.63 to 0.35% (P = 0.009) in the open ward. The HAP rate in the subgroups was higher in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (1.66 vs. 0.74%) and organic mental disorders (4.92 vs. 1.41%), and in those ≥65 years old (2.82 vs. 1.11%) but decreased significantly after intervention (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The implementation of the HAP bundle management strategy reduced the occurrence of HAP in hospitalized patients with mental disorders.

Impact of staffing levels and resources of intensive care units on compliance to standard mechanical ventilator guidelines: A city-wide study in times of COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected millions and resulted in a considerable strain on healthcare systems around the world. Intensive care units (ICUs) are reported to be affected the most because significant percentage of ICU patients requires respiratory support through mechanical ventilation (MV).

AIM

This study aims to examine the staffing levels and compliance with a ventilator care bundle in a single city in Pakistan.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of 14 ICUs including medical and surgical ICUs was conducted through a self-structured questionnaire including a standardized ventilator care bundle. We assessed the compliance of ICU staff to ventilator care bundle and calculated the correlation between staffing patterns with compliance to this bundle.

RESULTS

The unit response rate was 64% (7/11 hospitals). Across these seven hospitals, there were 14 functional ICUs (7 surgical and 7 medical). The Mean (SD) numbers of beds and ventilators were 8.14 (3.39) and 5.78 (3.68) while the average patient-to-nurse and patient-to-doctor ratio was 3: 1 and 5:1 respectively. The median ventilator care bundle compliance score was 26 (IQR = 21-28) out of 30, while in medical and surgical ICUs, median scores were 24 (IQR = 19-26) and 28 (IQR = 23-30) respectively. The perceived least compliant component was head elevation in ventilated patients. Correlation analysis revealed that 24 h a day, 7 days a week onsite cover of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support certified staff was positively correlated with the ventilator care bundle score (r_s  = 0.654, p value = .011). Similarly, 24-h cover of senior ICU nurses was significantly correlated with the application of chlorhexidine oral care (r_s  = 0.676, p value = .008) while routine subglottic aspiration was correlated with the number of doctors (r_s  = 0.636, p value = .014).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that ICUs in Peshawar are not well staffed in comparison with international standards and the compliance of ICUs with the ventilator care bundle is suboptimal. We found only a few aspects of ventilator care bundle compliance were related to nursing and medical staffing levels.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Critical care staffs at most of the medical ICUs in Peshawar are not compliant with the standard guidelines for patients on mechanical ventilation. Moreover, the staffing levels at these ICUs are not in accordance with international standards. However, this study suggests that staffing levels may not be the only cause of non-compliance with standard mechanical ventilator guidelines. There is an urgent need to design and implement a program that can enhance and monitor the quality of nursing care provided to mechanically ventilated patients. Lastly, nurse staffing of ICUs in Pakistan must be increased to enable high quality care and more doctors should be trained in critical care.

Impact of Rose Water Mouthwash on Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Preventing Ventilator- Associated Pneumonia (VAP) is an important strategy to increase the quality of provided care for patients under mechanical ventilation. Rose water is the main product of Rosa damascena which is a popular medicinal plant and has been widely used in alternative medicine. It has antibacterial activity against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria which can potentially cause VAP.

Materials and Methods

This study was a randomized, controlled, single-center trial. 88 patients in a 21-bed surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) who were under mechanical ventilation met the inclusion criteria, and 80 patients fulfilled the study. Based on receiving either rose water and chlorhexidine solution or chlorhexidine solution alone, the patients were divided into two groups of control and intervention. The incidence of VAP up to 14 days was the primary outcome. Duration of mechanical ventilation, the ICU length of stay, and mortality in ICU were the secondary outcomes.

Results

There was no significant difference in demographic data, the incidence of VAP, the incidence of late-onset VAP, mechanical ventilation days, length of the ICU stay, and mortality between the two groups. However, the incidence of early-onset VAP in the intervention group was significantly lower than in the control group (p= 0.021).

Conclusion

Rose water mouthwash significantly reduced the risk of early-onset VAP without any effect on late-onset VAP.

Prognosis of hospital‐acquired pneumonia/ventilator‐associated pneumonia with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Klebsiella pneumoniae in intensive care unit: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

We collected data on ventilator‐associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital‐acquired pneumonia (HAP) induced by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) and compared differences between two bacteria in mortality, duration of ventilator use, length of hospital stay, and risk factors for infection.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and to find risk factors of SM‐HAP/VAP versus KP‐HAP/VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted to the ICU between June 2019 and June 2021 and diagnosed with SM‐HAP/VAP or KP‐HAP/VAP. The primary outcome was 28‐day mortality.

Results

Ninety‐two HAP/VAP patients (48 with SM‐HAP/VAP and 44 with KP‐HAP/VAP) were included. The 28‐day mortality was 16.7% (8/48 patients) in SM‐HAP/VAP and 15.9% (7/44 patients) in KP‐HAP/VAP (P = 0.922). After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard ratios for 28‐day mortality in SM‐HAP/VAP were 1.3 (95% CI:0.5–3.7), 1.0 (95% CI:0.4–3.0), 1.4 (95% CI:0.5–4.0), and 1.1 (95% CI:0.4–3.4), respectively.

Conclusion

SM‐HAP/VAP and KP‐HAP/VAP patients in ICU might have a similar prognosis in mortality, the total duration of the artificial airway and ventilator use, the total length of ICU stay, and hospital stay. The risk factors of SM‐HAP/VAP versus KP‐HAP/VAP might be the artificial airway, ventilator use, gastric tube placement, acid suppressant and antibiotics (especially carbapenem).

Exploring the Nursing Factors Related to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the key nursing factors associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in critical care patients.

Methods

Through the quality control platform of Hebei Province, questionnaires were sent to intensive care nurses in 32 tertiary hospitals in Hebei Province, China to collect data concerning the incidence of VAP and the status of the nursing staff. All the data were analyzed using an independent t-test and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyse the correlation between the nursing factors and the incidence of VAP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors affecting VAP.

Results

In terms of nursing, the incidence of VAP was affected by the differential nursing strategies. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the incidence of VAP was significantly associated with the following six variables: the ratio of nurses to beds (p = 0.000), the ratio of nurses with a bachelor's degree or higher (p = 0.000), the ratio of specialist nurses (p = 0.000), the proportion of nurses with work experience of 5–10 years (p = 0.04), the number of patients nurses were responsible for at night (p = 0.01) and the frequency of oral care (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

The incidence of VAP is closely related to nursing factors. In terms of nursing human resources, even junior nurses (less experienced nurses) can play an essential role in reducing VAP. In addition, to reduce VAP, the number of patients that nurses are responsible for at night should be reduced as much as possible, and improving nursing qualifications.

Risk Factors and Nursing Countermeasures of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Children in the Intensive Care Unit

Objective

This study discussed and analyzed the risk factors and nursing countermeasures of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in the children intensive care unit (ICU).

Methods

In this study, 155 children with mechanical ventilation in the pediatric intensive care unit from Oct. 2018 to Oct. 2020 were chosen as research objects. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of children and divided them into VAP groups and non-VAP groups according to the occurrence of VAP. Subsequently, we adopted a univariate and multivariate logistic regression model to analyze and clarify the risk factors of VAP and formulated the corresponding nursing countermeasures.

Results

49 cases of total research objects had occurred VAP, with an infection rate of 31.62%. The primary pathogenic bacteria were Gram-negative bacteria (43/70, 61.43%). According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, the duration of mechanical ventilation, invasive procedures, and application of hormones and antacids are all independent risk factors for VAP in pediatric ICU. The VPA group had longer hospital stay than the non-VAP group, and the difference was statistically significant ((20.92 ± 4.16)d, (15.24 ± 3.77)d, t = 8.4383, P ≤ 0.001). The hospitalization cost of the VPA group was substantially higher than that of the non-VAP Group ((45.8 ± 10.4) thousand Yuan, (33.2 ± 4.3) thousand Yuan, t = 10.6822, P ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Children admitted to the pediatric ICU have a high VAP incidence. The primary pathogenic bacteria are Gram-negative bacteria. As the occurrence of VAP is closely related to a variety of factors, we should take targeted nursing countermeasures to reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation and the frequency of invasive operations and use the hormone and antacids rationally to reduce the risk of VAP and improve the prognosis.

Care bundles for improving outcomes in patients with COVID-19 or related conditions in intensive care - a rapid scoping review

BACKGROUND

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the strain of coronavirus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can cause serious illness in some people resulting in admission to intensive care units (ICU) and frequently, ventilatory support for acute respiratory failure. Evaluating ICU care, and what is effective in improving outcomes for these patients is critical. Care bundles, a small set of evidence-based interventions, delivered together consistently, may improve patient outcomes. To identify the extent of the available evidence on the use of care bundles in patients with COVID-19 in the ICU, the World Health Organization (WHO) commissioned a scoping review to inform WHO guideline discussions. This review does not assess the effectiveness of the findings, assess risk of bias, or assess the certainty of the evidence (GRADE). As this review was commissioned to inform guideline discussions, it was done rapidly over a three-week period from 26 October to 18 November 2020.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and describe the available evidence on the use of care bundles in the ICU for patients with COVID-19 or related conditions (acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) viral pneumonia or pneumonitis), or both. In carrying out the review the focus was on characterising the evidence base and not evaluating the effectiveness or safety of the care bundles or their component parts.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 26 October 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies of all designs that reported on patients who are critically ill with COVID-19, ARDS, viral pneumonia or pneumonitis, in the ICU setting, where a care bundle was implemented in providing care, were eligible for inclusion. One review author (VS) screened all records on title and abstract. A second review author (DR) checked 20% of excluded and included records; agreement was 99.4% and 100% respectively on exclude/include decisions. Two review authors (VS and DR) independently screened all records at full-text level. VS and DR resolved any disagreements through discussion and consensus, or referral to a third review author (AN) as required.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author (VS) extracted the data and a second review author (DR) checked 20% of this for accuracy. As the review was not designed to synthesise effectiveness data, assess risk of bias, or characterise the certainty of the evidence (GRADE), we mapped the extracted data and presented them in tabular format based on the patient condition; that is patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19, patients with ARDS, patients with any influenza or viral pneumonia, patients with severe respiratory failure, and patients with mixed conditions. We have also provided a narrative summary of the findings from the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 21 studies and identified three ongoing studies. The studies were of variable designs and included a systematic review of standardised approaches to caring for critically ill patients in ICU, including but not exclusive to care bundles (1 study), a randomised trial (1 study), prospective and retrospective cohort studies (4 studies), before and after studies (7 studies), observational quality improvement reports (4 studies), case series/case reports (3 studies) and audit (1 study). The studies were conducted in eight countries, most commonly China (5 studies) and the USA (4 studies), were published between 1999 and 2020, and involved over 2000 participants in total. Studies categorised participant conditions patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 (7 studies), patients with ARDS (7 studies), patients with another influenza or viral pneumonia (5 studies), patients with severe respiratory failure (1 study), and patients with mixed conditions (1 study). The care bundles described in the studies involved multiple diverse practices. Guidance on ventilator settings (10 studies), restrictive fluid management (8 studies), sedation (7 studies) and prone positioning (7 studies) were identified most frequently, while only one study mentioned chest X-ray. None of the included studies reported the prespecified outcomes ICU-acquired weakness (muscle wasting, weight loss) and users' experience adapting care bundles. Of the remaining prespecified outcomes, 14 studies reported death in ICU, nine reported days of ventilation (or ventilator-free days), nine reported length of stay in ICU in days, five reported death in hospital, three reported length of stay in hospital in days, and three reported adherence to the bundle.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review has identified 21 studies on care bundle use in critically ill patients in ICU with COVID-19, ARDS, viral influenza or pneumonia and severe respiratory failure. The data for patients with COVID-19 specifically are limited, derived mainly from observational quality improvement or clinical experiential accounts. Research is required, urgently, to further assess care bundle use and optimal components of these bundles in this patient cohort. The care bundles described were also varied, with guidance on ventilator settings described in 10 care bundles, while chest X-ray was part mentioned in one care bundle in one study only. None of the studies identified in this scoping review measured users' experience of adapting care bundles. Optimising care bundle implementation requires that the components of the care bundle are collectively and consistently applied. Data on challenges, barriers and facilitators to implementation are needed. A formal synthesis of the outcome data presented in this review and a critical appraisal of the evidence is required by a subsequent effectiveness review. This subsequent review should further explore effect estimates across the included studies.