Colon Microbiocenosis and Its Correction in Patients Receiving Programmed Hemodialysis

A Historical Perspective on Uremia and Uremic Toxins

Uremia, also known as uremic syndrome, refers to the clinical symptoms in the final stage of renal failure. The definition of the term has changed over time due to an improved comprehension of the kidney's function and the advancement of dialysis technology. Here, we aim to present an overview of the various concepts that have developed regarding uremia throughout the years. We provide a comprehensive review of the historical progression starting from the early days of Kolff and his predecessors, continuing with the initial research conducted by Niwa et al., and culminating in the remote sensing hypothesis of Nigam. Additionally, we explore the subsequent investigation into the function of these toxins as signaling molecules in various somatic cells.

Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A bidirectional kidney-gut axis was described in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). On the one hand, gut dysbiosis could promote CKD progression, but on the other hand, studies reported specific gut microbiota alterations linked to CKD. Therefore, we aimed to systematically review the literature on gut microbiota composition in CKD patients, including those with advanced CKD stages and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), possibilities to shift gut microbiota, and its impact on clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to find eligible studies using pre-specified keywords. Additionally, key inclusion and exclusion criteria were pre-defined to guide the eligibility assessment.

RESULTS

We retrieved 69 eligible studies which met all inclusion criteria and were analyzed in the present systematic review. Microbiota diversity was decreased in CKD patients as compared to healthy individuals. Ruminococcus and Roseburia had good power to discriminate between CKD patients and healthy controls (AUC = 0.771 and AUC = 0.803, respectively). Roseburia abundance was consistently decreased in CKD patients, especially in those with ESKD (p < 0.001). A model based on 25 microbiota dissimilarities had an excellent predictive power for diabetic nephropathy (AUC = 0.972). Several microbiota patterns were observed in deceased ESKD patients as compared to the survivor group (increased Lactobacillus, Yersinia, and decreased Bacteroides and Phascolarctobacterium levels). Additionally, gut dysbiosis was associated with peritonitis and enhanced inflammatory activity. In addition, some studies documented a beneficial effect on gut flora composition attributed to synbiotic and probiotic therapies. Large randomized clinical trials are required to investigate the impact of different microbiota modulation strategies on gut microflora composition and subsequent clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CKD had an altered gut microbiome profile, even at early disease stages. Different abundance at genera and species levels could be used in clinical models to discriminate between healthy individuals and patients with CKD. ESKD patients with an increased mortality risk could be identified through gut microbiota analysis. Modulation therapy studies are warranted.

Gut microbiome studies in CKD: opportunities, pitfalls and therapeutic potential

Interest in gut microbiome dysbiosis and its potential association with the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has increased substantially in the past 6 years. In parallel, the microbiome field has matured considerably as the importance of host-related and environmental factors is increasingly recognized. Past research output in the context of CKD insufficiently considered the myriad confounding factors that are characteristic of the disease. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites remain an interesting therapeutic target to decrease uraemic (cardio)toxicity. However, future studies on the effect of dietary and biotic interventions will require harmonization of relevant readouts to enable an in-depth understanding of the underlying beneficial mechanisms. High-quality standards throughout the entire microbiome analysis workflow are also of utmost importance to obtain reliable and reproducible results. Importantly, investigating the relative composition and abundance of gut bacteria, and their potential association with plasma uraemic toxins levels is not sufficient. As in other fields, the time has come to move towards in-depth quantitative and functional exploration of the patient's gut microbiome by relying on confounder-controlled quantitative microbial profiling, shotgun metagenomics and in vitro simulations of microorganism-microorganism and host-microorganism interactions. This step is crucial to enable the rational selection and monitoring of dietary and biotic intervention strategies that can be deployed as a personalized intervention in CKD.