The decision to opt for abortion

Mandatory Waiting Periods Before Abortion and Sterilization: Theory and Practice

Some laws insist on a fixed, compulsory waiting period between the time of obtaining consent and when abortions or sterilizations are carried out. Waiting periods are designed to allow for reflection on the decision and to minimize regret. In fact, the cognitive processing needed for these important decisions takes place relatively rapidly. Clinicians are used to handling cases individually and tailoring care appropriately, including giving more time for decision-making. Psychological considerations in relation to the role of emotion in decision-making, eg, regret, raise the possibility that waiting periods could have a detrimental impact on the emotional wellbeing of those concerned which might interfere with decision-making. Having an extended period of time to consider how much regret one might feel as a consequence of the decision one is faced with may make a person revisit a stable decision. In abortion care, waiting periods often result in an extra appointment being needed, delays in securing a procedure and personal distress for the applicant. Some women end up being beyond the gestational limit for abortion. Those requesting sterilization in a situation of active conflict in their relationship will do well to postpone a decision on sterilization. Otherwise, applicants for sterilization should not be forced to wait. Forced waiting undermines people's agency and autonomous decision-making ability. Low-income groups are particularly disadvantaged. It may be discriminatory when applied to marginalized groups. Concern about the validity of consent is best addressed by protective clinical guidelines rather than through rigid legislation. Waiting periods breach reproductive rights. Policymakers and politicians in countries that have waiting periods in sexual and reproductive health regulation should review relevant laws and policies and bring them into line with scientific and ethical evidence and international human rights law.

Knowledge and attitudes of Irish GPs towards abortion following its legalisation: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

In May 2018, the Irish Constitution was changed following a referendum allowing termination of pregnancy by abortion. It is envisaged that the majority of terminations will be by medical abortion and will take place in general practice before 12 weeks gestation.

AIM

To elicit attitudes and level of preparedness of Irish GPs to provide medical abortion services.

DESIGN & SETTING

Cross-sectional study of 222 GPs who were associated with the University of Limerick Graduate Entry Medical School (GEMS) and GP training programme.

METHOD

An anonymous online questionnaire was distributed via email. Reminders were sent 2 and 4 weeks later.

RESULTS

The response rate was 57.2% (n = 127/222). Of the responders, 105 (82.7%) had no training in this area, with only 4 (3.1%) indicating that they had sufficient training. Nearly all responders (n = 119, 93.7%) were willing to share abortion information with patients. Just under half of responders (n = 61, 48.0%) would be willing to prescribe abortion pills, with 47 (37.0%) unwilling to do so. Only 53 (41.7%) responders believed that provision of abortion services should be part of general practice, with 52 (40.9%) saying that it should not. As to whether doctors should be entitled to a conscientious objection but should also be obliged to refer the patient, 92 (72.4%) responders agreed. Over two-thirds of responders (n = 89, 70.1%) felt that necessary patient support services are not currently available.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of training and a considerable level of unwillingness to participate in this process among Irish GPs. There is also a perceived lack of patient support services for women experiencing unwanted pregnancy. It is incumbent upon state and professional bodies to address these issues.

Decision-making trajectories leading to termination of an unplanned pregnancy: specificities among adolescent and adult women

Objective: To describe the decision-making trajectories leading to termination of an unplanned pregnancy and to explore the differences according to women's age. Background: Although decision-making regarding abortion has been conceptualised as a multiphase event, the different trajectories leading to termination of an unplanned pregnancy remain unexplored. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 422 women (248 adolescents, 174 adults) who had an abortion were recruited. Data were collected through self-report questionnaires at 16 Portuguese healthcare services. Results: Eight decision-making trajectories leading to termination of an unplanned pregnancy were identified according to the sequence: consideration (or not) to continue the pregnancy, conceal (or not) the decision from the family, the main decision-maker, and reasons for abortion. The most frequent trajectory included women who did not consider its continuation, did not conceal the reproductive decision from their family, were the main decision-maker and referred as reasons for abortion 'education/job would be more difficult to continue'. Adolescents more frequently not considering pregnancy continuation, not concealing the decision from their family and referred as reasons for abortion the prioritisation of their academic plans and immaturity; or considering its continuation, but were pressured into abortion by their parents. Adults more frequently (not) considering pregnancy continuation, concealed the decision from their family and reported economic reasons for abortion; or considering its continuation, but were pressured into abortion by their partners. Conclusion: Our study may contribute to more informed intervention by healthcare providers involved in supporting women's decisions, highlighting the need to promote an informed, weighted, developmentally adapted and free decision-making process.

Pre-abortion counselling from women's point of view

OBJECTIVE

The value of mandatory pre-abortion counselling for women seeking abortions has been repeatedly questioned. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives and feelings of almost 1000 women regarding pre-abortion counselling in Flanders.

METHODS

Participating women (N = 971) - all requesting an abortion at one of the five Flemish abortion centres - were offered a questionnaire prior to the counselling session and immediately afterwards. Both questionnaires measured their emotional and cognitive state as well as aspects of the content and the perceived value of the counselling session.

RESULTS

Prior to the counselling, women are hesitant regarding the value of the sessions, feel distressed, yet decisive about their abortion. After the counselling session, women assign an increased value to the counselling, are very satisfied, and experience less distress and greater decisiveness. During counselling the abortion procedure (89%), the use of contraceptives (83%) and the individual decision-making process (81%) are nearly always addressed. The sessions are tailored to each woman and to the needs they expressed with regard to the content of the counselling.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-abortion counselling in Flanders is standardised as well as personalised. The women in this study positively valued it.

Trends in teenage termination of pregnancy and its risk factors: a population-based study in Finland, 1987-2009

STUDY QUESTION

What are the current trends in teenage termination of pregnancy (TOP) and its risk factors?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The incidence of teenage TOP fluctuated substantially during the study period and the incidence of repeat TOP among adolescents increased markedly in the 2000s.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Teenage pregnancy is associated with difficulties in psychological, sexual and overall health. The proportion of teenage pregnancies resulting in termination varies by country and time, but only few countries have reliable statistics on TOPs.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This nationwide retrospective register study included all the TOPs (n= 52 968) and deliveries (n= 58 882) in Finland between 1987 and 2009 among girls <20 years of age at the beginning of pregnancy.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The cohorts were divided into three subgroups; 13-15- (n= 6087), 16-17- (n= 18 826) and 18-19- (n= 28 055) year-olds.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

After an initial steady decline, the incidence of teenage TOP increased by 44% between 1993 (8.0/1000) and 2003 (11.5/1000), and thereafter declined by 16% until 2009 (9.7/1000). The incidence was higher in older adolescents, but the trends were alike in all age groups. Early TOPs (performed at <56 days of gestation) more than tripled from 11 to 36% during the study period. However, the proportion of second-trimester TOPs remained steady at ≈ 7%. Young age [13-15 years: odds ratio (OR) 1.75 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-1.94), 16-17 years: OR 1.13 (1.05-1.23), 18-19 years: OR 1 (reference category)] and non-use of contraception [(OR 11.16 (10.15-12.27)] were related to a higher risk of second-trimester TOP. The incidence of repeat TOP increased by 95% from 1.9/1000 to 3.7/1000 in 18-19-year-olds and by 120% from 0.5/1000 to 1.1/1000 in 16-17-year-olds between 1993 and 2009. Increasing age [13-15 years: OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.14-0.19), 16-17 years: OR 0.49 (0.45-0.52), 18-19 years 1 (Ref)], living in an urban area [rural: OR 0.62 (0.56-0.67), urban: OR 1 (Ref)] and having undergone a second-trimester TOP [OR 1.46 (1.31-1.63)] were risk factors for repeat TOP. The planned use of intrauterine contraception for post-abortal contraception increased from 2.6 to 6.2% and among girls with repeat TOP from 10 to 19%.

LIMITATIONS

The retrospective nature of the study remains a limitation and the quality of the data is reliant on the accuracy of reporting. We were not able to link repeat TOPs of the same woman in our data set. However, the share of repeat abortions was moderate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The rate of teenage TOP seems to rapidly reflect changes in national sexual and reproductive health services and policy. The rising rate of repeat TOP is alarming and may represent a sign of marginalization among these girls. All efforts to maintain a low rate of teenage pregnancy are welcomed.