1
|
Ferdous T, Roy S, Chowdhury S, Jebai R, Maya L, DeCaprio AP, Bursac Z, Maziak W. Partial Nicotine Reduction and E-Cigarette Users' Puffing Behaviors Among Adults Aged 21 to 35 Years: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2422954. [PMID: 39058490 PMCID: PMC11282440 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.22954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The advent of salt-based, high-nicotine electronic nicotine delivery systems [e-cigarettes] has contributed to their epidemic use among young people in the US, necessitating the need for policies to address the addictiveness of these products. Objective To evaluate the effect of partial nicotine reduction on new-generation e-cigarette users' puffing behaviors. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted at the Clinical Research Lab for Tobacco Smoking at Florida International University in Miami between April 15, 2022, and October 17, 2023. Using a volunteering sampling method by distributing flyers and advertisements, current e-cigarette users (who preferred 5% nicotine concentration), aged 21 to 35 years, were included. Intervention In a crossover design, participants completed 2 sessions of the same product (JUUL or NJOY) that differed by nicotine concentration (3% [JUUL] or 2.4% [NJOY] and 5% [JUUL or NJOY]) in random order. In each session, participants vaped up to 60 minutes ad libitum, preceded by 12 hours of nicotine abstinence. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were puffing topography parameters (eg, total session time, puffing time, total puffing number, interpuff interval, total inhaled volume, average puff volume, duration, and flow rate) measured during each session and plasma nicotine measured before and after each session. Results Among 735 participants who were approached for eligibility, 675 were excluded, and 10 did not complete session 2. Of the 50 remaining current e-cigarette users (mean [SD] age, 23 [3] years; 56% men), 23 (46%) were low nicotine dependent. The median topography parameters were significantly higher during the e-cigarette use sessions with 3% or 2.4% nicotine concentration compared with 5% nicotine concentration for 3 outcomes: puffing time (1.3 minutes [IQR, 0.3-9.4 minutes] vs 1.2 minutes [IQR, 0.2-5.6 minutes]; P = .02), puff duration (2.6 seconds [IQR, 0.8-6.9 seconds] vs 2.4 seconds [IQR, 0.4-6.6 seconds]; P = .02), and total inhaled volume (1990.0 mL [IQR, 279.0-24 400.0 mL] vs 1490.0 mL [IQR, 148.0-14 300.0 mL]; P = .05). The median plasma nicotine boost observed in the 5% nicotine concentration condition (0.0060 mg/L [IQR, 0.0001-0.0249 mg/L]) was significantly higher than that in the 3% or 2.4% session (0.0043 mg/L [IQR, 0.0008-0.0225 mg/L]) (P = .001). Additionally, deeper puffing (increased average puff duration and average puff volume) was observed in participants with higher nicotine dependence (1.42 seconds [95% CI, 1.12-1.80 seconds]; P = .03) and male users (1.38 mL [95% CI, 1.09-1.75 mL]; P = .04) in response to nicotine reduction. Conclusions and Relevance This randomized crossover clinical trial provides direct evidence that partial nicotine reduction in salt-based e-cigarettes was associated with acute compensatory puffing and the potential for increased exposure to toxicants. However, given the reduced nicotine delivery associated with nicotine reduction, the acute compensatory response observed in this study may not preclude a population benefit due to the marketing of less addictive products. These results suggest that at least for current e-cigarette users, partial nicotine reduction can lead to enhanced exposure to some toxicants in the short term. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05205382.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarana Ferdous
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Simanta Roy
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Sreshtha Chowdhury
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Rime Jebai
- Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leonardo Maya
- Forensic and Analytical Toxicology Facility, Global Forensic and Justice Center, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Anthony P. DeCaprio
- Forensic and Analytical Toxicology Facility, Global Forensic and Justice Center, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Zoran Bursac
- Department of Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami
| | - Wasim Maziak
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Soule E, Bansal-Travers M, Grana R, McIntosh S, Price S, Unger JB, Walton K. Electronic cigarette use intensity measurement challenges and regulatory implications. Tob Control 2023; 32:124-129. [PMID: 34059553 PMCID: PMC8630087 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Assessing tobacco use intensity allows researchers to examine tobacco use in greater detail than assessing ever or current use only. Tobacco use intensity measures have been developed that are specific to tobacco products, such as asking smokers to report number of cigarettes smoked per day. However, consensus on electronic cigarette use intensity measures that can be used for survey research has yet to be established due to electronic cigarette product and user behavior heterogeneity. While some survey measures that attempt to assess electronic cigarette use intensity exist, such as examining number of 'times' using an electronic cigarette per day, number of puffs taken from an electronic cigarette per day, volume of electronic cigarette liquid consumed per day, or nicotine concentration of electronic cigarette liquid, most measures have limitations. Challenges in electronic cigarette measurement often stem from variations across electronic cigarette device and liquid characteristics as well as the difficulty that many electronic cigarette users have regarding answering questions about their electronic cigarette device, liquid, or behavior. The inability for researchers to measure electronic cigarette use intensity accurately has important implications such as failing to detect unintended consequences of regulatory policies. Development of electronic cigarette use intensity measures, though not without its challenges, can improve understanding of electronic cigarette use behaviors and associated health outcomes and inform development of regulatory policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Soule
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Rachel Grana
- Tobacco Control Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Scott McIntosh
- Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Simani Price
- Public Health and Epidemiology Practice, Westat, Center for Coordination of Analytics, Science, Enhancement, and Logistics, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer B Unger
- Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Kevin Walton
- Division of Therapeutics and Medical Consequences, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li W, Vargas-Rivera M, Kalan ME, Taleb ZB, Asfar T, Osibogun O, Noar SM, Maziak W. The Effect of Graphic Health Warning Labels Placed on the ENDS Device on Young Adult Users' Experience, Exposure and Intention to Use: A Pilot Study. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2022; 37:842-849. [PMID: 33475000 PMCID: PMC8292444 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1872158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
This proof-of-concept study aims to evaluate the effect of placing graphic health warning labels (GHWLs) on the ENDS device on users' experience, puffing patterns, harm perception, nicotine exposure, and intention to quit or use in the future. JUUL users (n = 26, age 18-24 years; 69% male; 85% Hispanic) were recruited to complete two 60 minutes ad libitum sessions that differed by GHWL on the device (GHWL vs. no-GHWL control) in an experimental clinical lab study. Compared to the control session, using JUUL with GHWL on the device was significantly associated with reduced positive experiences such as pleasure, product liking, and user satisfaction (p-value < 0.05 for all). Also, after exposure to GHWL, participants were less interested in using the same product again (p-value = 0.007), even if it was the only product available on the market compared to control (p-value = 0.03). Trends toward reduced puffing behavior and nicotine boost were also noted during the GHWL, compared to control sessions. This pilot study shows that placing GHWL on the ENDS device may be an effective and promising strategy to reduce ENDS use among young people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Li
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University
| | - Mayra Vargas-Rivera
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University
| | - Mohammad Ebrahimi Kalan
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University
| | - Ziyad Ben Taleb
- Department of Kinesiology, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington
| | - Taghrid Asfar
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami
| | - Olatokunbo Osibogun
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University
| | - Seth M. Noar
- Hussman School of Journalism and Media, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Wasim Maziak
- Department of Epidemiology, Robert Stempel College of Public Health, Florida International University
- Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Aleppo
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Douglas AE, Childers MG, Romm KF, Felicione NJ, Ozga JE, Blank MD. Device features and user behaviors as predictors of dependence among never-smoking electronic cigarette users: PATH Wave 4. Addict Behav 2022; 125:107161. [PMID: 34710840 PMCID: PMC8629948 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.107161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 10/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electronic cigarettes (ECIGs) vary greatly in their ability to deliver nicotine, which suggests they may also vary in their ability to produce dependence. This study examined individual and combined ECIG device features, and also user behaviors, as predictors of dependence in never-smoking ECIG users. Methods Data were collected from 711 current ECIG users who had smoked <100 cigarettes in their lifetime at Wave 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Multivariable linear regressions examined individual (e.g., contains nicotine, uses a tank, flavor preference) and combined (e.g., refillable tanks, refillable mods) device features, and user behaviors (e.g., uses/day) as predictors of dependence, withdrawal, and craving after accounting for demographic variables. Results Results for ECIG dependence and craving showed a similar pattern; higher levels were observed for older age, more frequent past 30-day use, using an ECIG containing nicotine (vs no nicotine), and using a non-refillable cartridge or refillable tank style (vs disposables). Higher withdrawal levels were observed for higher education levels and individual device features of tank (vs no tank), cartridge (vs no cartridge), refillable (vs non-refillable), and "other" flavor preference (vs tobacco flavor). Lower withdrawal levels were associated with a preference for sweet/fruit flavor(s) (vs tobacco flavor). Conclusions Few use behaviors and device features, whether examined alone or in combination, predicted dependence-related outcomes. Findings underscore the challenge with regulating ECIG products in the current marketplace, which is inundated with a myriad of device types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E. Douglas
- Department of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown WV 26506 USA
| | - Margaret G. Childers
- Department of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown WV 26506 USA
| | - Katelyn F. Romm
- Milken Institute School of Public Health, 800 22 Street NW #7000C, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 USA
| | - Nicholas J. Felicione
- Department of Health Behavior, 665 Elm Street, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY 14216 USA
| | - Jenny E. Ozga
- Department of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, 3602 Collins Ferry Road, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
| | - Melissa D. Blank
- Department of Psychology, 53 Campus Drive, 2214 Life Sciences Building, West Virginia University, Morgantown WV 26506 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bello MS, Liautaud MM, De La Cerda JT, Pang RD, Ray LA, Ahluwalia JA, Leventhal AM. Association of frequency of perceived exposure to discrimination with tobacco withdrawal symptoms and smoking lapse behavior in African Americans. Addiction 2021; 116:914-925. [PMID: 32860477 PMCID: PMC7914272 DOI: 10.1111/add.15238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Frequent experiences of discrimination could increase vulnerability to tobacco withdrawal and smoking lapse in populations subject to tobacco-related health disparities. This laboratory study (2013-17) examined whether individual differences in perceived exposure to discrimination in one's daily life predicted tobacco withdrawal symptoms and smoking lapse behavior following acute tobacco deprivation in African American smokers. DESIGN Mixed design with the between-subjects continuous variable of perceived discrimination crossed with the within-subject variable of tobacco deprivation status (deprived versus non-deprived). SETTING Academic medical center in Los Angeles, CA, USA. PARTICIPANTS African American non-treatment seeking daily cigarette smokers (n = 607, ≥ 10 cig/day). MEASUREMENTS At a baseline visit, self-reported frequency of perceived exposure to discrimination in one's daily life was measured [everyday discrimination scale (EDDS)]. At two subsequent counterbalanced experimental visits (16-hour tobacco deprivation versus ad-libitum smoking), self-report assessments of various tobacco withdrawal symptom domains [Brief Questionnaire of Smoking Urges), Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale (WSWS), Profile of Mood States (POMS), Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) and Current Impulsivity Scale (CIS)) and a behavioral smoking lapse analogue task were measured. FINDINGS Adjusted models demonstrated that greater frequency of perceived exposure to discrimination was associated with larger deprivation-induced increases in acute urges to smoke to alleviate negative mood, several negative mood states and subjective cognitive functioning-effect sizes were small in magnitude (βs = 0.09-0.13; Ps < 0.02). Data were inconclusive for associations between perceived exposure to discrimination and deprivation-induced changes in cravings, urges to smoke for pleasure, positive mood reduction, other symptoms or smoking reinstatement behavior. CONCLUSIONS Frequency of perceived exposure to discrimination appears to be modestly associated with increased severity of some deprivation-induced tobacco withdrawal symptoms in African American smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariel S. Bello
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Madalyn M. Liautaud
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Julianne T. De La Cerda
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Raina D. Pang
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lara A. Ray
- University of California Los Angeles, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jasjit A. Ahluwalia
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Adam M. Leventhal
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vapers exhibit similar subjective nicotine dependence but lower nicotine reinforcing value compared to smokers. Addict Behav 2021; 115:106737. [PMID: 33360443 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION E-cigarette use has increased rapidly over the last 10 years, mostly among smokers and ex-smokers. Although there may be some degree of dependency on nicotine via e-cigarette use, the nature of this dependency is poorly understood. The aim of this paper is to use tasks from behavioural economics to compare the value that smokers place on tobacco cigarettes to the value that vapers place on e-cigarettes. METHOD Exclusive current smokers (n = 25) and vapers (n = 20) attended one session where they completed the Cigarette/e-cigarette Dependence Scale, the Cigarette/e-cigarette Purchasing Task (CPT) and the Concurrent Choice Task (CCT). The CPT requires participants to indicate how many puffs of their chosen product they would purchase at increasing price points. The CCT requires participants to choose between earning a money point or a point towards a cigarette/e-cigarette after being presented with a neutral, money or cigarette/e-cigarette cue. RESULTS Overall scores on the self-report scales suggest a comparable level of dependency between smokers and vapers. The CPT revealed that vapers are more sensitive than smokers to escalating costs as consumption declined as costs increased. On the CCT, when primed with money, vapers showed a decrease in choosing e-cigarettes. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that, on behavioural economic tasks, tobacco cigarettes have a higher relative value than e-cigarettes. Vapers appear to place a lower limit on what they will spend to access e-cigarettes and more readily choose money over e-cigarette puffs when primed by money cues.
Collapse
|
7
|
Harris N, Gillespie GL, Davis KG. Electronic Cigarettes: Exposure to Secondhand Vapors at a Long-Term Healthcare Company. JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2021; 11:1-6. [PMID: 35371369 PMCID: PMC8970531 DOI: 10.5430/jnep.v11n2p1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Healthcare workers in long term care settings have limited control over their occupational secondhand exposure to electronic cigarettes and other tobacco products. METHODS The study aimed to identify the perceived frequency of exposure to exhaled electronic cigarette vapor on healthcare workers within two sites of a long-term healthcare company. An online survey was completed by 149 (out of approximately 500) employees that asked about electronic cigarette personal usage, concerns for exposure, exposure times, and demographic data. RESULTS Twelve percent of all survey respondents expressed concerns related to second-hand exposure. Of those exposed, employee estimated exposure time was 2.1 minutes per shift for electronic cigarettes compared to 12.1 minutes per shift for cigarettes/cigars/pipes. CONCLUSIONS Overall self-reported secondhand exposure to electronic cigarettes and cigarettes/cigars/pipes was low. To determine a definitive exposure level, quantitative sampling can be done related to chemical exposure via passive inhalation of the smoke and vapor cloud for cigarettes and electronic cigarettes, respectively. Education can be provided to healthcare workers and residents in long-term care facilities regarding risk of exposure to secondhand smoke to alleviate employees concerns with exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Harris
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Gordon L. Gillespie
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Kermit G. Davis
- Department of Environmental and Public Health Science, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Breland A, Maloney SF, Soule EK, Ramôa C, Barnes A, Lipato T, Eissenberg T. Abuse liability of electronic cigarettes in men who are experienced electronic cigarette users. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2020; 28:235-244. [PMID: 31259592 PMCID: PMC6938579 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Most electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) aerosolize a nicotine-containing liquid that users inhale. Few experimental studies have examined e-cig abuse liability (the extent to which use of these products may lead to persistent and/or problematic use). In this study, 24 experienced male e-cig users completed 4 sessions that differed byproduct used: own e-cig (OWN), an eGo e-cig filled with participants' own brand/flavor liquid in 0 mg/mL nicotine (e-cig0), an eGo e-cig filled with the highest nicotine concentration available in participants' own brand/flavor (e-cighighest), and a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved nicotine inhaler (IN). Outcome measures included crossover point on the multiple-choice procedure, plasma nicotine delivery, and subjective effect profile. After 10 puffs, a significantly higher mean crossover point was observed for OWN at $1.35 (SD = 0.90) compared to e-cighighest at $0.88 (SD = 0.89), e-cig0 at $0.83 (SD = 0.79), and IN at $0.72 (SD = 0.84). Significant increases in mean plasma nicotine concentration were observed for OWN at 7.94 ng/mL (SD = 6.19) and e-cighighest at 7.51 ng/mL (SD = 5.39). Significant reductions in abstinence symptom suppression and higher ratings of satisfaction were observed for OWN and e-cighighest, with significantly less suppression and lower ratings of satisfaction for e-cig0 and IN. These findings suggest that human laboratory methods can be used to assess e-cig abuse liability and that nicotine-containing e-cigs have greater abuse liability than nicotine-free e-cigs and the IN. Potential regulations intended to limit e-cig abuse liability should be tested using these or similar procedures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Breland
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220
| | - Sarah F. Maloney
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220
| | - Eric K. Soule
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Departement of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, 238 Rivers West Greenville, NC 27858
| | - Carolina Ramôa
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220
| | - Andrew Barnes
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Department of Health Behavior Policy, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980430, Richmond, Virginia, 23298
| | - Thokozeni Lipato
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Box 980102, Richmond, Virginia 23298
| | - Thomas Eissenberg
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220,Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, College of Humanities and Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University, 100 W. Franklin St., Suite 200, Richmond, VA 23220
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strickland JC, Stoops WW. Utilizing content-knowledge questionnaires to assess study eligibility and detect deceptive responding. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE 2019; 46:149-157. [PMID: 31810399 DOI: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1689990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background: Deceptive responding during eligibility screening presents a significant concern for assessing inclusion/exclusion criteria. This problem is compounded in settings for which biomarkers or other objective verification (e.g., urinalysis) are not feasible.Objectives: Introduce and describe content-knowledge questionnaires as an objective method for collaterally assessing study eligibility.Methods: Participants (N = 3772; 66.1% female) recruited using the crowdsourcing resource Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) completed a Cannabis Knowledge Questionnaire (CKQ). The CKQ contained four-items indexing knowledge of typical cannabis costs, weights, and terminology. Self-reported cannabis use history was collected and compared to individual item and total scale scores. A separate in-laboratory assessment evaluated participants during in-person screening for cannabis, alcohol, and cocaine research protocols (N = 43).Results: Good internal consistency (α = .74) was observed. The most common correctly answered question was about dabbing (41.4%) followed by cannabis cost (37.6%), hybrid strains (36.6%), and estimated weight (29.7%). Current cannabis use was associated with large effect size increases in the rate of correct responses (RR = 3.64) as well as odds of a correct response on individual items (OR = 5.88-21.48). In the laboratory study, participants with a positive urine drug test for cannabis or those reporting lifetime regular cannabis use scored higher than those without this history (RR = 1.89-2.61).Conclusion: These findings highlight the efficiency and efficacy of including content-knowledge questionnaires for collateral assessment of study eligibility, especially when biomarkers are not possible. Future studies will be useful for extending this initial demonstration to alternative settings and substances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C Strickland
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - William W Stoops
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY, USA.,Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.,Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Felicione NJ, Enlow P, Elswick D, Long D, Sullivan C, Blank MD. A pilot investigation of the effect of electronic cigarettes on smoking behavior among opioid-dependent smokers. Addict Behav 2019; 91:45-50. [PMID: 30006020 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 06/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Compared to the general population, smoking rates are 2-4 times higher among individuals with opioid use disorders (OUDs). These smokers also have poor long-term cessation rates, even with pharmacotherapy or other interventions. Low success rates with traditional approaches may prompt smokers with OUDs to try more novel products like electronic cigarettes (ECIGs). This pilot study was designed to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effect of ECIGs on smoking behavior among smokers with OUD. METHODS Participants (N = 25) were daily smokers receiving buprenorphine/naloxone for OUD at an outpatient clinic. They were randomized to use a second-generation ECIG (0 or 18 ng/ml nicotine) ad libitum for two weeks while completing assessments via text messaging daily, and also via in-person visits at baseline, end of the two-week intervention, and a 4-week follow-up. RESULTS Feasibility was evidenced by high enrollment (93.9%) and retention (70.9%) rates. ECIG adherence was relatively high as measured by self-report (80.6% active, 91.7% placebo), while the average volume of liquid used per week was low (~3 ml). Both ECIG doses produced reductions in self-reported cigarettes per day that were not supported by average carbon monoxide levels. Biologically-confirmed smoking abstinence was observed in 8% of participants. CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results suggest that smokers with OUD are interested in using ECIGs, but their adherence may be less than ideal. Poor medication adherence rates are often observed in this disparate population, and future work should consider the use of other ECIG device types and a combination of methods to verify and quantify ECIG use.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hiler M, Breland A, Spindle T, Maloney S, Lipato T, Karaoghlanian N, Shihadeh A, Lopez A, Ramôa C, Eissenberg T. Electronic cigarette user plasma nicotine concentration, puff topography, heart rate, and subjective effects: Influence of liquid nicotine concentration and user experience. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 25:380-392. [PMID: 29048187 PMCID: PMC5657238 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Electronic cigarette (ECIG) nicotine delivery and other effects may depend on liquid nicotine concentration and user experience. This study is the first to systematically examine the influence of ECIG liquid nicotine concentration and user experience on nicotine delivery, heart rate, puff topography, and subjective effects. Thirty-three ECIG-experienced individuals and 31 ECIG-naïve cigarette smokers completed 4 laboratory conditions consisting of 2, 10-puff bouts (30-sec interpuff interval) with a 3.3-V ECIG battery attached to a 1.5-Ω "cartomizer" (7.3 W) filled with 1 ml ECIG liquid. Conditions differed by liquid nicotine concentration: 0, 8, 18, or 36 mg/ml. Participants' plasma nicotine concentration was directly related to liquid nicotine concentration and dependent on user experience, with significantly higher mean plasma nicotine increases observed in ECIG-experienced individuals relative to ECIG-naïve smokers in each active nicotine condition. When using 36 mg/ml, mean plasma nicotine increase for ECIG-experienced individuals was 17.9 ng/ml (SD = 17.2) and 6.9 (SD = 7.1; p < .05) for ECIG-naïve individuals. Between-group differences were likely due to longer puffs taken by experienced ECIG users: collapsed across condition, mean puff duration was 5.6 sec (SD = 3.0) for ECIG-experienced and 2.9 (SD = 1.5) for ECIG-naïve individuals. ECIG use also suppressed nicotine/tobacco abstinence symptoms in both groups; the magnitude of abstinence symptom suppression depended on liquid nicotine concentration and user experience. These and other recent results suggest that policies intended to limit ECIG nicotine delivery will need to account for factors in addition to liquid nicotine concentration (e.g., device power and user behavior). (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzena Hiler
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Alison Breland
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Tory Spindle
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Sarah Maloney
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Thokozeni Lipato
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA,Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Nareg Karaoghlanian
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alan Shihadeh
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA,Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Alexa Lopez
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Carolina Ramôa
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Thomas Eissenberg
- Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA,Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
"Essentially, All Models are Wrong, but Some Are Useful": A Preliminary Conceptual Model Of Co-Occurring E-Cig and Alcohol Use. CURRENT ADDICTION REPORTS 2017; 4:200-208. [PMID: 29057201 DOI: 10.1007/s40429-017-0148-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW As prevalence rates of electronic cigarette (e-cig) use increase, researchers and clinicians should not only be paying careful attention to the direct health effects of e-cigs, but also the potential impact e-cigs may have on alcohol use behaviors. We review the current state of the literature and propose a conceptual model for the relationship between e-cig and alcohol use, including important consequences, mechanisms, and moderators of this relationship. RECENT FINDINGS The model is based in emerging literature examining the direct relationship between e-cig and alcohol use, as well as indirect evidence concerning potential mechanisms from research on cigarette and alcohol use. Overall, research indicates a robust relationship between e-cig and alcohol use. SUMMARY We suggest that a relationship between e-cig use and alcohol use could be particularly problematic, especially for adolescents and for those with or at risk for alcohol use disorders. We hope the presented conceptual model can stimulate research in this area. We make research recommendations, including the need for more methodological rigor, including improved measurement of e-cig use, and expanding research to longitudinal and experimental designs.
Collapse
|
13
|
Advances in Behavioral Laboratory Methods that Inform Tobacco Regulatory Science: A TCORS Working Group Special Issue. TOB REGUL SCI 2016; 2:294-300. [PMID: 29152546 DOI: 10.18001/trs.2.4.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA) created unprecented enabling conditions for establishing national regulatory policy that reduces the burden of public health and societal problems associated with tobacco product use. The Center for Tobacco Products (CTP), created by the FDA to implement the TCA, developed a first-of-its-kind FDA/National Institutes of Health (NIH) collaborative program to fund Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science (TCORS). Methods To assist the TCORS with addressing research priorites, working groups (WGs) comprised of FDA-CTP liasions and TCORS investigators were formed. Under the direction of the Center for Evaluation and Coordination of Trainin and Research (CECTR), the TCORS WGs seek to develop tangible work products in their respective areas of focus. Results The focus of the behavioral pharmacology WG evolved from publishing a narrow paper on behavioral methods in electronic cigarette research to a collection of papers on advances in behavioral laboratory methods that may inform tobacco regulatory science. Conclusion This Special Issue contains articles that address all of the CTP research priorities and demonstrates how advances in behavioral laboratory methods made by TCORS investigators can inform FDA efforst to regulate tobacco products.
Collapse
|