Long term efficacy and stability of corneal collagen cross linking for post-LASIK ectasia: an average of 80mo follow-up

Visual and Topographic Outcomes of Corneal Collagen Cross Linking for Post LASIK Ectasia

Purpose

To assess the topographic and visual outcomes of corneal cross-linking (CXL) for post-LASIK ectasia.

Methods

A retrospective case series of patients who had progressive post-LASIK ectasia, with at least 2 years of follow-up. They had epithelium-off CXL. Topographical and visual changes were recorded.

Results

The study included 21 eyes of 11 patients. At month 24, the final logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and spherical equivalent (SE) were stable compared to baseline (0.16, and −2.0 diopter (D), respectively). The final Kmean and Kmax were 42.5 and 47.4 D, respectively. Stability or improvement in CDVA, SE, and Kmax was seen in 17 eyes (81%). Significant corneal thinning was seen (438 vs 457 microns, p = 0.003). Thinning by 2% or more was seen in 12 eyes (57.1%). Failure of CXL was seen in 4 eyes (19%). No other ocular complications were seen.

Conclusion

CXL for post LASIK ectasia is a safe and effective modality. Despite corneal thinning, there was stability or improvement in topographic parameters and CDVA over the 2-year follow-up period.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes between Combined Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis and Corneal Cross Linking versus Combined Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction and Corneal Cross Linking

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with prophylactic cross linking (FS-LASIK Xtra) and small-incision lenticule extraction with prophylactic cross linking (SMILE Xtra) in terms of their postoperative clinical outcomes.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 24 patients (48 eyes) with myopia and myopia astigmatism were recruited from 2017 to 2018. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations preoperatively and follow-up visits at one and three months. Four patients (eight eyes) in each group were followed up for 12 months. The following were assessed at each visit: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), keratometry values, biomechanical properties, anterior and posterior curvature, and corneal pachymetry.

Results

The FS-LASIK Xtra and SMILE Xtra groups both included 24 eyes of 12 patients. At 1, 3, and 12 months after surgery, a UDVA of 20/20 or better was achieved for 91.7%, 91.7%, and 87.5% of individuals, respectively, in the FS-LASIK group and 95.8%, 100%, and 100% in the SMILE group, respectively. For 75% of eyes in the FS-LASIK Xtra group and 100% of eyes in the SMILE Xtra group, the achieved MRSE was within ±1.00D of attempted correction. The LASIK Xtra group had a significantly higher mean MRSE than the SMILE Xtra group at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P=0.006, 0.01), and the SMILE Xtra group had significantly higher K1 and K2 values than the FS-LASIK group at one month after surgery (P=0.024, 0.023). Corneal thickness decreased significantly at one month postoperatively and started to increase over the next 12 months in both groups (P=0.001). The biomechanical properties showed no significant intergroup differences at the 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions

FS-LASIK Xtra and SMILE Xtra are safe and effective in the correction of myopia and myopia astigmatism, and both procedures have the same effect on postoperative corneal morphology and biomechanics.

Corneal Cross-Linking for Keratoconus and Post-LASIK Ectasia and Failure Rate: A 3 Years Follow-Up Study

Purpose To report the response of keratoconus (KC) and post-LASIK ectasia (referred to as "ectasia") to the corneal crosslinking (CXL) and to compare the rate of progression between KC and ectasia at three years. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CXL for either KC or ectasia. Fifty-four eyes (31 patients) with ectasia and 111 eyes (67 patients) with KC were included in the study. Corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), refraction, keratometry (K), and pachymetry were followed up for three years. Simultaneous photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and CXL were performed on 20 KC and 20 ectasia eyes. Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments (ICRS) were performed on 51 KC and six ectasia eyes. Results In KC, CDVA, spherical equivalence, sphere, cylinder, and mean K improved at three years post-CXL (p-value<0.05), but these values improved without reaching a statistical significance in ectasia(p-values <0.05). 12 of 54 eyes with ectasia (22.2%) and 4 of 111 eyes (3.6%) with KC had progression post CXL(p-value:0.0001). Ectasia patients diagnosed with progression were older at presentation (36.1 years) than non-progressive ectasia patients (31 years) (p-value 0.02) and also older than KC patients. Sub-analysis excluding PRK and ICRS cases showed that there was an improvement in mean sphere (from -5.23±4.2D to-4.46±3.89D) (p-value 0.03) cylinder (from 2.54 ± 1.68D to 1.97 ± 1.51D) (p-value 0.03) mean keratometry (from 46.81 ± 3.78D to 46.01 ± 3.25D) (p-value 0.006) in KC patients 3 years post CXL (40 patients). Compared to baseline, all the mean refractive and topographic variables deteriorated at three years post CXL in ectasia (28 patients) (p-value>0.05). Also, 2 of 40 patients with KC (5%) vs. 7 of 28 patients with ectasia (25%) had progression three years post-CXL, and the difference between both groups remained statistically significant(p-value 0.027). Conclusion Eyes with post-LASIK ectasia seem to be less responsive to CXL than KC.

Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of ectasia following refractive surgery is unclear. This review sought to determine the worldwide rates of ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) based on reports in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Publications were identified by a search of eight electronic databases for relevant terms between 1984 and 2021. Patient characteristics and preoperative values including manifest refractive spherical refractive equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior keratometry, postoperative residual stromal bed (RSB), and percent tissue altered (PTA) were summarized. In addition, annual rates of each refractive surgery were determined, and incidence of post-refractive ectasia for each type was calculated using the number of ectatic eyes identified in the literature.

RESULTS

In total, 57 eyes (70 eyes including those with preoperative risk factors for ectasia) were identified to have post-PRK ectasia, while 1453 eyes (1681 eyes including risk factors) had post-LASIK ectasia, and 11 eyes (19 eyes including risk factors) had post-SMILE ectasia. Cases of refractive surgery performed annually were estimated as 283,920 for PRK, 1,608,880 for LASIK, and 96,750 for SMILE. Reported post-refractive ectasia in eyes without preoperative identifiable risk factors occurred with the following incidences: 20 per 100,000 eyes in PRK, 90 per 100,000 eyes in LASIK, and 11 per 100,000 eyes in SMILE. The rate of ectasia in LASIK was found to be 4.5 times higher than that of PRK.

CONCLUSION

Post-refractive ectasia occurs at lower rates in eyes undergoing PRK than LASIK. Although SMILE appears to have the lowest rate of ectasia, the number of cases already reported since its recent approval suggests that post-SMILE ectasia may become a concern. Considering that keratoconus is a spectrum of disease, pre-existing keratoconus may play a larger role in postoperative ectasia than previously accounted for in the literature.

Recurrent refractive error after myopic laser-assisted keratomileusis - What could be the reason?

Recurrence of myopia after myopic LASIK reduces the outcome of the procedure. Important causes include post-LASIK ectasia, regression of myopia, accommodative strain, and lens or axial length changes. Herein, we present a case of myopia recurring after LASIK and try to arrive at the possible diagnosis among these, as the treatment differs for each. The detailed evaluation showed that our patient had regression of myopia after LASIK. Of the multiple causes for recurrence of refractive error after myopic laser vision correction, it is important to identify the relevant reason as the treatment and prognosis for each of these is different.

Ectasia after keratorefractive surgery: Analysis of risk factors and treatment outcomes in the Indian population

Purpose:

To analyze the risk factors in eyes developing ectasia following keratorefractive procedures. In addition, the study assessed visual outcomes following various treatment modalities for ectasia.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, data of patients who underwent keratorefractive procedures, presenting to the refractive services of a tertiary eye care hospital in South India between January 2016 and May 2019 was analyzed. Of these, the eyes that developed ectasia were noted and the possible risk factors were determined. Visual outcomes following treatment with corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) with or without intracorneal ring segment implantation (ICRS) or topography-guided corneal ablation (T-PRK) were analyzed.

Results:

Forty eyes of 26 patients developed ectasia following keratorefractive procedures, with a mean interval of 73.1± 45.4 months between primary procedure and ectasia development. Of these, 14 patients had bilateral presentation. Identifiable risk factors included ablation depth >75 μm (59.25%), percentage of tissue altered (PTA) >40% (48.14%), residual stromal bed <300 μm (22.22%), mean refractive spherical equivalent >8 D (25.92%), inferior–superior (I–S) asymmetry >1.4D (7.40%), central corneal thickness (CCT) <500 μm (7.40%), Belin Ambrosio Display (BAD) >2.5 (7.40%), posterior float elevation maximum ≥18 μm (3.70%), and pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD; 3.70%).

Conclusion:

Our study shows that only 70% of the eyes demonstrated an identifiable risk factor for the development of ectasia. Ablation depth of >75 μm and the PTA >40% were the most common risk factors. Treatment following CXL with ICRS or T-PRK demonstrated significantly better visual outcomes in comparison with CXL alone.