1
|
Simbar M, Nazarpour S, Sheidaei A. Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes in mothers with COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2023; 43:2162867. [PMID: 36651606 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2162867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Pregnant women are one of the endangered groups who need special attention in the COVID-19 epidemic. We conducted a systematic review and summarised the studies that reported adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19 infection. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Scopus up to 1 September 2022, for retrieving original articles published in the English language assessing the association between COVID-19 infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Finally, in this review study, of 1790 articles obtained in the initial search, 141 eligible studies including 1,843,278 pregnant women were reviewed. We also performed a meta-analysis of a total of 74 cohort and case-control studies. In this meta-analysis, both fixed and random effect models were used. Publication bias was also assessed by Egger's test and the trim and fill method was conducted in case of a significant result, to adjust the bias. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of preterm delivery, maternal mortality, NICU admission and neonatal death in the group with COVID-19 infection was significantly more than those without COVID-19 infection (p<.01). A meta-regression was conducted using the income level of countries. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy may cause adverse pregnancy outcomes including of preterm delivery, maternal mortality, NICU admission and neonatal death. Pregnancy loss and SARS-CoV2 positive neonates in Lower middle income are higher than in High income. Vertical transmission from mother to foetus may occur, but its immediate and long-term effects on the newborn are unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoumeh Simbar
- Midwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sima Nazarpour
- Department of Midwifery, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ali Sheidaei
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Messas T, Lim RK, Burns L, Yumeen S, Kroumpouzos G. A critical review of COVID-19 course and vaccination in dermatology patients on immunomodulatory/biologic therapy: recommendations should not differ between non-pregnant and pregnant individuals. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1121025. [PMID: 37332768 PMCID: PMC10272467 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1121025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 can have detrimental effects on immunosuppressed patients. Here, we evaluate the evidence regarding continuing immunomodulatory/biologic (IMBI) therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we discuss the risks of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI therapy. As indicated in this review, regarding continuing IMBI therapy in pregnant dermatology patients during the pandemic, there is no compelling reason for treating them differently than non-pregnant. The body of evidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy. Studies on rheumatology patients, a group that overlaps significantly with the dermatology group, provided essential findings. IMBI in a non-pregnant rheumatology patient was not associated with COVID-19 mortality (except for rituximab), and vaccination of the rheumatology patient during pregnancy improved the obstetric outcomes compared to the unvaccinated patient. Based on this data, it can be stated that after weighing the benefit-risk profile of the available COVID-19 vaccines, the recommendation for the pregnant dermatology patient speaks in favor of the COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccine recommendations in pregnant dermatology patients on IMBI should not differ from those for their non-pregnant counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tassahil Messas
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Centre, University of Constantine III, Constantine, Algeria
| | - Rachel K. Lim
- Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Laura Burns
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Sara Yumeen
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - George Kroumpouzos
- Department of Dermatology, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
- GK Dermatology, PC, South Weymouth, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Charuta A, Smuniewska M, Woźniak Z, Paziewska A. Effect of COVID-19 on Pregnancy and Neonate's Vital Parameters: A Systematic Review. J Pregnancy 2023; 2023:3015072. [PMID: 37215313 PMCID: PMC10199793 DOI: 10.1155/2023/3015072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 is a new pandemic, which was declared by the World Health Organization in 2019 as a threat to public health. According to numerous reports, it can have negative consequences for pregnant women, labour, and neonates born to infected mothers. The aim of this paper was to gather the evidence and to present a summary of the results of studies concerning COVID-19 in pregnant women and their neonates. Methods Articles from prestigious journals covering the period from 2020 to February 2023, relevant review papers, and original research articles from PubMed were analysed. In order to analyse the available research literature, the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases were used, in which the search for articles was conducted using terms ("pregnancy," "coronavirus," "SARS-CoV-2," and "newborn") and using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines for clinical trials. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on symptoms, neonatal course, and risk of COVID-19 infection have been summarized. Summary of meta-analyses and systematic reviews (2022-2023) on the effect and adverse reaction of the COVID-19 vaccination is presented. Results As a result of the research conducted, it was confirmed that in most pregnant women, no serious signs of the infection were observed, although isolated cases of death related to COVID-19 in pregnant women were reported. Several authors called attention to the more severe course of the infection in pregnant women with obesity. It seemed that no vertical transmission from mother to child was occurring. Nevertheless, the information was not clinching. The condition of the neonates born to mothers with COVID-19 was in most cases described as normal; however, some papers reported deaths of infected neonates. Conclusions Due to insufficient data, further research is necessary. Further studies and follow-up are recommended, which would make possible an assessment of remote effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and vital parameters of the newborn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Charuta
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Poland
| | - Monika Smuniewska
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Mazowiecki Provincial Hospital in Siedlce Named after Saint John Paul II in Siedlce, Poland
| | - Zofia Woźniak
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Independent Public Health Care Center in Sokołów Podlaski, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Paziewska
- Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andreoli L, Chighizola CB, Iaccarino L, Botta A, Gerosa M, Ramoni V, Tani C, Bermas B, Brucato A, Buyon J, Cetin I, Chambers CD, Clowse MEB, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Cutolo M, De Carolis S, Dolhain R, Fazzi EM, Förger F, Giles I, Haase I, Khamashta M, Levy RA, Meroni PL, Mosca M, Nelson-Piercy C, Raio L, Salmon J, Villiger P, Wahren-Herlenius M, Wallenius M, Zanardini C, Shoenfeld Y, Tincani A. Immunology of pregnancy and reproductive health in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Update from the 11 th International Conference on Reproduction, Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases. Autoimmun Rev 2023; 22:103259. [PMID: 36549355 DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) can affect women and men during fertile age, therefore reproductive health is a priority issue in rheumatology. Many topics need to be considered during preconception counselling: fertility, the impact of disease-related factors on pregnancy outcomes, the influence of pregnancy on disease activity, the compatibility of medications with pregnancy and breastfeeding. Risk stratification and individualized treatment approach elaborated by a multidisciplinary team minimize the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO). Research has been focused on identifying biomarkers that can be predictive of APO. Specifically, preeclampsia and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy tend to develop more frequently in women with ARD. Placental insufficiency can lead to intrauterine growth restriction and small-for-gestational age newborns. Such APO have been shown to be associated with maternal disease activity in different ARD. Therefore, a key message to be addressed to the woman wishing for a pregnancy and to her family is that treatment with compatible drugs is the best way to ensure maternal and fetal wellbeing. An increasing number of medications have entered the management of ARD, but data about their use in pregnancy and lactation are scarce. More information is needed for most biologic drugs and their biosimilars, and for the so-called small molecules, while there is sufficient evidence to recommend the use of TNF inhibitors if needed for keeping maternal disease under control. Other issues related to the reproductive journey have emerged as "unmet needs", such as sexual dysfunction, contraception, medically assisted reproduction techniques, long-term outcome of children, and they will be addressed in this review paper. Collaborative research has been instrumental to reach current knowledge and the future will bring novel insights thanks to pregnancy registries and prospective studies that have been established in several Countries and to their joint efforts in merging data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Andreoli
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cecilia B Chighizola
- Paediatric Rheumatology Unit, ASST G. Pini & CTO, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Iaccarino
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Angela Botta
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Pediatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Gerosa
- Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO, Research Center for Adult and Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Véronique Ramoni
- Medicina Generale Lodi, ASST Lodi-Ospedale Maggiore, Lodi, Italy
| | - Chiara Tani
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Brucato
- Internal Medicine, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Jill Buyon
- Division of Rheumatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Irene Cetin
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Woman, Mother and Child, Luigi Sacco and Vittore Buzzi Children Hospitals, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Milan, Italy
| | - Christina D Chambers
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Megan E B Clowse
- Division of Rheumatology & Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau
- Internal Medicine Department, Cochin Hospital, Referral center for rare autoimmune and systemic diseases, Université de Paris, CRESS, INSERM, INRA, Paris, France
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Academic Division of Clinical Rheumatology, Department of Internal M edicine, University of Genoa, IRCSS San Martino Polyclinic, Genoa, Italy
| | - Sara De Carolis
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Pediatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Radboud Dolhain
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elisa M Fazzi
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Frauke Förger
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital (Inselspitaland University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ian Giles
- Centre for Rheumatology, Department of Inflammation, Division of Medicine, University College London, Department of rheumatology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Isabell Haase
- Department for Rheumatology and Hiller Research Institute, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Munther Khamashta
- Women & Children's Health, King's College, London, UK; GlaxoSmithKline Global Medical Expert, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Roger A Levy
- Universidade do Estado de Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; GlaxoSmithKline Global Medical Expert, Collegeville, PA, USA
| | - Pier Luigi Meroni
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Immunorheumatology Research Laboratory, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Mosca
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Raio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital (Inselspitaland University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jane Salmon
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Villiger
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Center Monbijou, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Marie Wahren-Herlenius
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne Wallenius
- National Advisory Unit on Pregnancy and Rheumatic Diseases, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, University Hospital and Institute of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Cristina Zanardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Yehuda Shoenfeld
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Ariel University, Ariel, Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Angela Tincani
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yilmaz M, Aksin Ş, Balsak D, Avci F, Özdoğru O, Helvacıoğlu B, Erdemoğlu M, Aboalhasan Y, Doğan G. Comparison of Perinatal, Newborn, and Audiometry Results of COVID-19 Pregnant Women. Int J Clin Pract 2022; 2022:2699532. [PMID: 36263236 PMCID: PMC9553656 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2699532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are studies on the perinatal outcomes of COVID-19, but the audiometric effects of the maternal immune system against COVID-19 in the newborn are not clear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the perinatal outcomes of COVID-19 positive pregnant women and the audiological outcomes of newborns. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted with 65 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive pregnant women and newborns and 66 normal pregnant women and newborns who were admitted between January 2020-December 2021. Pregnancy data, perinatal outcomes, and newborn hearing test results of pregnant women and newborns were recorded and compared. RESULTS A total of 131 patients were enrolled in the study. The number of normal pregnant women was 66 (50.4%) and the number of pregnant women who had COVID-19 disease was 65 (49.6%). In general, gestational week, age, parity, biochemical parameters, duration of hospital stay, week of delivery, fetal weight, and apgar scores were compared between pregnant women with COVID-19 and normal. White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and C-reactive protein (CRP) parameters were found to be significantly higher, and lymphocyte and neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratios were significantly lower (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ 2=0.001; p = 1,000). The normal delivery status, the normal delivery rate in patients with COVID-19 was found to be statistically significantly higher than the cesarean section delivery status (p = 0.012). In the statistical comparison between the COVID-19 and normal pregnant groups in the cesarean section group, the gestational week, delivery week, and apgar1 scores of the pregnant women with COVID-19 were found to be significantly higher. There was no statistically significant difference between the distributions of the rate of infants with hearing impairment in the comparison with hearing tests in pregnant women with COVID-19 (n=1) and normal pregnant women (n=1) (χ 2=0.001; p = 1,000). CONCLUSION Although the negative effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes are rare, it was determined that there was no increased audiological risk factor, and the most important predictor of COVID-19 was lymphopenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Yilmaz
- Siirt University, Medical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt, Turkey
| | - Şerif Aksin
- Siirt University, Medical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt, Turkey
| | - Deniz Balsak
- Siirt University, Medical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt, Turkey
| | - Fazil Avci
- Akşehir State Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konya, Turkey
| | - Osman Özdoğru
- Siirt University, Medical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt, Turkey
| | | | - Mahmut Erdemoğlu
- Siirt University, Medical Faculty, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siirt, Turkey
| | | | - Gülsüm Doğan
- Siirt Training and Research Hospital, Siirt, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|