Economic burden of major bleeding events in commercially insured patients with von Willebrand disease based on claims data from the United States

Retrospective chart review of GI bleeding in people with von Willebrand disease

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events (BEs) in von Willebrand disease (VWD) are difficult to diagnose and often recurrent. Limited data from clinical trials has led to lack of consensus on treatment options.

AIM

Describe current treatments and outcomes for GI BEs in people with VWD.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, multicentre chart review study was conducted from January 2018 through December 2019 and included patients with inherited VWD with ≥1 GI BE in the preceding 5 years. Baseline characteristics, number and aetiology of BEs, associated GI-specific morbidities/lesions, treatment and outcomes were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Sixty bleeds were reported in 20 patients with type 1 (20%), type 2 (50%) and type 3 (30%) VWD. During the 5-year study period, 31 (52%) BEs had one identified or suspected cause; multiple causes were reported in 11 (18%). Most GI BEs (72%) were treated with a combination of von Willebrand factor (VWF), antifibrinolytics and/or other haemostatic or non-haemostatic treatments. Time to resolution did not differ by VWF treatment use; however, BEs treated with non-VWF treatments tended to resolve later. In patients with GI-specific morbidities/lesions, 84% resolved with first-line treatment; time to resolution tended to be longer than in patients without such morbidities/lesions. Thirteen BEs occurred in patients receiving prophylaxis and 47 in patients receiving on-demand treatment; 18 BEs resulted in a switch to prophylaxis after bleed resolution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the unmet need for the management of recurrent GI BEs in people with VWD and the need for prospective data, especially on prophylaxis.

Real-world healthcare costs and resource utilization in patients with von Willebrand disease and angiodysplasia

OBJECTIVE

To describe the economic burden among VWD patients with angiodysplasia compared to VWD patients without angiodysplasia and the general population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis using the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases® (January 2011-September 2020). Selected patients had ≥1 medical claim for VWD or low VWF, ≥1 medical claim for AGD, and ≥3 GI-related bleeding episodes within a year. HCRU and all-cause costs were compared with the VWD (only) and the general cohorts.

RESULTS

The mean total all-cause costs were $150,101 among patients with VWD and angiodysplasia (n = 34), higher compared to $48,249 among matched VWD patients without angiodysplasia (n = 136) and $31,029 among matched individuals of the general population [n = 136; p-value < 0.0001]. The differences in costs between groups were primarily due to inpatient care. During the 12-month follow-up, VWD patients with symptomatic (n = 35), asymptomatic (n = 81), and suspected (n = 378) angiodysplasia had an average of 4.1, 0.6, and 3.8 gastrointestinal (GI) bleeds, respectively. Desmopressin, VWF concentrates, and aminocaproic acid were the most frequent treatments used. The most frequent procedures to treat GI-related bleeding and underlying lesions were blood transfusion and laser therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent therapeutic advances, there is room for considerable reduction of the disease burden in patients with VWD and angiodysplasia.

Von Willebrand Disease Epidemiology, Burden of Illness and Management: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Although hereditary von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common bleeding disorder, its epidemiology is not well understood. A systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020197674/CRD42021244374) on the epidemiology/burden of illness of VWD was conducted to better understand patients' unmet needs.

Methods

Observational studies (published January 1, 2010 to April 14, 2021) were identified in MEDLINE and Embase databases, using free-text keywords and thesaurus terms for VWD and outcomes of interest. Pragmatic web-based searches of the gray literature, including conference abstracts, were performed, and reference lists of retained publications were manually searched for additional sources. Case reports and clinical trials (phase 1-3) were excluded. Outcomes of interest were incidence, prevalence, mortality, patient characteristics, burden of illness, and therapeutic management/treatments currently used for VWD.

Results

Of the 3095 identified sources, 168 were included in this systematic review. Reported VWD prevalence (22 sources) ranged from 108.9 to 2200 per 100,000 in population-based studies and from 0.3 to 16.5 per 100,000 in referral-based studies. Reported times between first symptom onset and diagnosis (two sources; mean 669 days; median 3 years) highlighted gaps in timely VWD diagnosis. Bleeding events reported in 72-94% of the patients with VWD (all types; 27 sources) were mostly mucocutaneous including epistaxis, menorrhagia, and oral/gum bleeding. Poorer health-related quality of life (three sources) and greater health care resource utilization (three sources) were reported for patients with VWD than in general populations.

Conclusion

Available data suggest that patients with VWD experience high disease burden in terms of bleeding, poor quality of life, and health care resource utilization.

Economic Burden Associated with Major Surgery in Patients with von Willebrand Disease: A United States Retrospective Administrative Database Analysis

Purpose

To estimate the incremental economic burden of major surgeries in patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD).

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of the IBM Health MarketScan^® database (2008–2018). Patients with at least two healthcare visits for VWD in the database who had undergone at least one major surgery unrelated to VWD (identified via International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions procedure codes) were included. Patients without VWD with major surgeries were selected from a 1% random database sample. All patients had ≥12 months of continuous healthcare plan enrollment before and following their first major surgery. Patients with VWD were matched (1:1) with patients without VWD using propensity score matching. Regression models compared healthcare resource utilization and costs between the matched cohorts over a 12-month period after patients’ index major surgery.

Results

After propensity score matching, 2972 pairs were selected. Musculoskeletal and digestive surgeries were the two most common major surgeries (patients with VWD, 39.6% and 25.0%; without VWD, 37.1% and 23.4%, respectively). Patients with VWD were significantly more likely (p<0.0001) to have an inpatient admission (odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.52–1.92) or emergency room visit (odds ratio = 1.41; 95% CI 1.25–1.59) than patients without VWD. The numbers of inpatient admissions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.47; 95% CI 1.35–1.60), emergency room visits (IRR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.31–1.59), and outpatient visits (IRR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.11–1.21) per patient were also significantly greater for patients with VWD than for those without VWD (p<0.0001). Patients with VWD incurred significantly higher (p<0.0001) total healthcare costs (medical and pharmacy) per patient than patients without VWD ($50,733.89 versus $30,154.84, respectively).

Conclusion

Healthcare resource utilization and associated costs among patients undergoing major surgeries were significantly higher for those with VWD than for patients without VWD.