Prognostic effect of liver metastasis in lung cancer patients with distant metastasis

Advanced non-squamous NSCLC with no actionable oncogenic driver in Spain: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis of data from the Thoracic Tumor Registry

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of all diagnosed lung cancers. According to their histology, most NSCLCs are considered non-squamous cell carcinoma (NSCC), and up to 85% of the latter may lack either one of the two main actionable oncogenic drivers (i.e., EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements).

OBJECTIVE

Our analysis aimed to describe the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Spanish patients suffering from NSCC with no actionable oncogenic driver in daily clinical practice.

DESIGN

A retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.

METHODS

We analyzed the records of all Spanish patients with advanced NSCC diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2020 and included in the Spanish Thoracic Tumor Registry database. We evaluated the presence of metastasis and molecular profiling at the time of diagnosis and treatments received. We also assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to first-line treatment.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred ninety-seven Spanish patients with NSCC were included. They were mainly men (73.2%), smokers (current [44.4%] and former [44.4%]) and presented adenocarcinoma histology (97.6%). Most patients had at least one comorbidity (80.4%) and one metastatic site (96.8%), and a non-negligible number of those tested were PD-L1 positive (35.2%). Notably, the presence of liver metastasis indicated a shorter median OS and PFS than metastasis in other locations (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy was more often prescribed than immunotherapy as first-, second-, and third-line treatment in that period. In first-line, the OS rates were similar in patients receiving either regimen, but PFS rates significantly better in patients treated with immunotherapy (p = 0.026). Also, a high number of patients did not reach second- and third-line treatment, suggesting the failure of current early diagnostic measures and therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of the most lethal tumor in Spain could highlight the strengths and the weaknesses of its clinical management and set the ground for further advances and research.

Site-Specific Response and Resistance Patterns in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Systemic Therapy

Patients with advanced NSCLC have heterogenous responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy. In NSCLC, the impact of the distribution of metastatic sites and the response to systemic therapy combinations remain poorly understood. In a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC who received first-line systemic therapy, we sought to assess the association between the site of metastases with patterns of response and progression. Data regarding demographics, tumour characteristics (including site, size, and volume of metastases), treatment, and outcomes were examined at two cancer care centres. The endpoints included organ site-specific response rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Two-hundred and eighty-five patients were included in the analysis. In a multivariate analysis, patients with bone metastases had a reduced ORR, PFS, and OS. Primary resistance was also more likely in patients with bone metastases. Patients with bone or liver metastases had a shorter OS when receiving ICIs with or without chemotherapy, but not with chemotherapy alone, suggesting an immunological basis for therapeutic resistance. A directed assessment of the tumour microenvironment in these locations and a deeper understanding of the drivers of organ-specific resistance to immunotherapy are critical to optimise novel combination therapies and sequencing in these patients.

The Incidence and Effect of Different Organ Metastasis on the Prognosis of NSCLC

OBJECTIVE

 The aim of this study was to explore the effect of different organ metastasis on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

 Patients with distant metastatic NSCLC were selected from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database during 2016 to 2019. The incidence of different organ metastasis and their association with clinicopathological factors were explored. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) for metastatic NSCLC were calculated, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed with a nomogram for OS being constructed based on Cox regression.

RESULTS

 Total 26,210 patients with distant metastatic NSCLC were included in this study. Around 48.9% of the metastatic NSCLC were multiple-organ metastasis and bone was the most commonly involved organ (44.4%). For patients with single-organ metastasis, the prognosis for lung or distant lymph nodes (LNs) metastasis was better than others (with median OS of 15 and 16 months for lung and distant LNs metastasis, respectively), and liver metastasis resulted in the worst prognosis with median OS of 8 months. A nomogram was constructed to visualize Cox regression model, along with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve demonstrated good discrimination for the predictive model with 1- and 2-year area under the curve of ROC of 0.687 and 0.702, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 The prognosis of NSCLC patients with distant metastasis was poor. Liver metastasis results in the worst prognosis among the single-organ metastasis. The nomogram developed based on the Cox regression model has provided a useful tool to estimate the probability of OS of the metastatic NSCLC.

Optimal therapeutic strategy for non-small cell lung cancer with thoracic extrathoracic metastasis: a study based on SEER database

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastasis (EM) are a highly heterogeneous cohort. Some of these patients could benefit from primary tumor surgery. This study aimed to identify potential NSCLC patients with EM suitable for primary tumor resection and to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy.

Methods

NSCLC patients with EM were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2010 and 2015. They were stratified into subgroups with single and multi-EMs. Cox regression analysis was adopted to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the OS among patients who received different treatment modalities.

Results

The univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that advanced age, male sex, race (black), married status, squamous cell carcinoma, higher histological grade, advanced T or N stage, contralateral lung metastasis, multi-EMs, tumor size >2 cm, and lack of treatment were associated with poorer OS in patients with NSCLC (P<0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the number of EM and treatment modalities were independent prognostic factors affecting OS (P<0.001). For patients with single EM, those who did not receive treatment and those who underwent single-agent chemotherapy, single-agent surgery, surgery combined with chemotherapy, surgery combined with radiotherapy, or surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy had median OS times of 3.0, 11.0, 12.0, 26.0, 11.0, and 25.0 months, respectively. Compared to monotherapy, combination therapy showed significant benefits for patients with single EM in NSCLC. Furthermore, patients with single EM who underwent lobectomy, bilobectomy, or pneumonectomy had significantly longer survival than those who underwent sublobar resection, even when the primary tumor size was ≤2 cm (P=0.04).

Conclusions

Primary tumor surgery could benefit NSCLC patients with single EM; lobectomy was at least warranted to improve survival even for primary tumors with size ≤2 cm.

Combination of radiotherapy and Anlotinib enhances benefit from immunotherapy to liver metastasis and abscopal tumor from lung cancer

Many studies have shown that liver metastasis can weaken the efficacy of immunotherapy. Immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy or anti-angiogenic therapy has been proven to have synergistic anti-tumor effects. So we devote to explore whether the combination of the three therapies can exert effective anti-tumor effects on liver metastasis. The clinical information of 118 patients with liver metastasis were collected to compare the intrahepatic progression-free survival between immunotherapy and immunotherapy combined with other treatments. We used Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cell to establish a mouse liver metastasis tumor model and record tumor burden and survival. Tumor-infiltrating immune cells detected by flow cytometry. RNA sequencing was performed and the proportion of immune cells were analyzed by TIMER2.0 database. Compared with immunotherapy group, the combination therapy group showed a trend for longer median intrahepatic progression-free survival. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can inhibit liver metastasis and subcutaneous tumor growth and prolong the survival compared with other groups in vivo. Compared with the anti-PD-1 treatment group, triple therapy can increase CD4+T, CD8+T, and IFN-γ+CD8+T cells and decrease infiltration of polymorphonuclear myeloid-derived suppressor cells (PMN-MDSC) in tumors. PPAR signaling pathway were significantly activated and CD8+T and dendritic cells (DC) were increased in the triple therapy group compared to the PD-1 inhibitor combined with Anlotinib group. Radiotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor and Anlotinib can effectively exert anti-tumor efficacy and reshape the tumor immune microenvironment by increasing the infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells and reducing the infiltration of immunosuppressive immune cells.

Prognostic factors in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients with organ-specific metastasis: unveiling commonalities and disparities

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify shared and distinct prognostic factors related to organ-specific metastases (liver, lung, bone, and brain) in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients, then construct nomograms for survival prediction.

METHODS

Patient data for ES-SCLC were from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to estimate overall survival (OS), and Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. A Venn diagram was utilized to distinguish common and unique prognostic factors among the variables assessed. These identified prognostic factors were used to formulate a nomogram, and its predictive accuracy and reliability were evaluated using C-indexes, calibration curves, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

A total of 24,507 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC exhibiting metastases to the liver, lung, bone, and brain were included. The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS rates were 46.1%, 19.7%, and 5.0%, respectively. Patients with liver metastasis demonstrated the most unfavorable prognosis, with a 1-year OS rate of 14.5%, while those with brain metastasis had a significantly better prognosis with a 1-year OS rate of 21.6%. The study identified seven common factors associated with a poor prognosis in ES-SCLC patients with organ-specific metastases: older age, male sex, unmarried status, higher T stage, presence of other metastases, and combination radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Furthermore, specific prognostic factors were identified for patients with metastasis to the liver, bone, and brain, including paired tumors, lack of surgical treatment at the primary site, and household income, respectively. To facilitate prognostic predictions, four nomograms were developed and subsequently validated. The performance of these nomograms was assessed using calibration curves, C-indexes, and the area under the curve (AUC), all of which consistently indicated good predictive accuracy and reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC with organ-specific metastases revealed shared and distinct prognostic factors. The nomograms developed from these factors demonstrated good performance and can serve valuable clinical tools to predict the prognosis of ES-SCLC patients with organ-specific metastases.

Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization of Primary Lung Cancer Metastases to the Liver

PURPOSE

To assess whether yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is safe and effective in the treatment of primary lung cancer metastases to the liver (LCML).

METHODS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 57 patients with LCML who were treated with 79 TARE treatments. Histology included non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 27), small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (n = 17), and lung carcinoid (LC) (n = 13). Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method; differences between groups were estimated using log rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors influencing survival. Adverse events were graded using the Society of Interventional Radiology Adverse Events Classification.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) was as follows: NSCLC, 8.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.3-16.4 months); SCLC, 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.9-6.6 months); and LC, 43.5 months (95% CI, 7.8-61.4 months). For NSCLC, presence of bilobar vs unilobar disease (hazard ratio [HR], 5.24; 95% CI, 1.64-16.79; P = .002); more tumors, 2-5 vs 1 (HR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.17-20.37; P = .003) and >5 vs 1 (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 0.95-6.92; P = .05); and lobar vs segmental treatment (HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002) were negative predictors of OS. For SCLC, receipt of >2 lines of chemotherapy vs ≤2 lines (HR, 3.16; 95% CI, 0.95-10.47; P = .05) was a negative predictor of OS. For LC, tumor involvement of >50% was a negative predictor of OS (HR, 3.77 × 1015; 95% CI, 0-NA; P = .002). There were 11 of 79 severe or life-threatening adverse events within 30 days (abdominal pain, altered mental status, nausea/vomiting, acalculous/aseptic cholecystitis, hyponatremia, pancreatitis, renal failure, and death from pneumonia).

CONCLUSIONS

TARE has an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of LCML, with survival benefits best seen in LC tumors.

Beyond boundaries: unraveling innovative approaches to combat bone-metastatic cancers

Evidence demonstrated that bones, liver, and lungs are the most common metastasis sites in some human malignancies, especially in prostate and breast cancers. Bone is the third most frequent target for spreading tumor cells among these organs and tissues. Patients with bone-metastatic cancers face a grim prognosis characterized by short median survival time. Current treatments have proven insufficient, as they can only inhibit metastasis or tumor progression within the bone tissues rather than providing a curative solution. Gaining a more profound comprehension of the interplay between tumor cells and the bone microenvironment (BME) is of utmost importance in tackling this issue. This knowledge will pave the way for developing innovative diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This review summarizes the mechanisms underlying bone metastasis and discusses the clinical aspects of this pathologic condition. Additionally, it highlights emerging therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing the quality of life for patients affected by bone-metastatic cancers. By synthesizing current research, this review seeks to shed light on the complexities of bone metastasis and offer insights for future advancements in patient care.

Modeling Tumor Cell Dormancy in an Ex Vivo Liver Metastatic Niche

Despite decades of research into metastatic disease, our knowledge of the mechanisms governing dormancy are still limited. Unraveling the process will aid in developing effective therapies to either maintain or eliminate these dormant cells and thus prevent them from emerging into overt metastatic disease. To study the behavior of dormant tumor cells-mechanisms that promote, maintain, and disrupt this state-we utilize the Legacy LiverChip®, an all-human ex vivo hepatic microphysiological system. This complex, bioengineered system is able to recreate metastatic disease that is reflective of the human situation and is among only a handful of systems able to mimic spontaneous tumor cell dormancy. The dormant subpopulation reflects the defining traits of cellular dormancy-survival in a foreign microenvironment, chemoresistance, and reversible growth arrest. This microphysiological system has and continues to provide critical insights into the biology of dormant tumor cells. It also serves as an accessible tool to identify new therapeutic strategies targeting dormancy and concurrently evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic agents as well as their metabolism and dose-limiting toxicity.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastasis

Background

Among all metastatic lesions in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), liver metastasis (LM) is the most lethal site with a median survival of less than 5 months. Few studies exclusively report on prognostic factors for these unique patients. We aimed to construct and validate a practical model to predict the prognosis of NSCLC patients with LM.

Methods

Cases of NSCLC with LM diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and were randomly split into training and validation cohort (7:3). The overall survival (OS) was measured from diagnosis until date of death or last follow-up. Cox regression analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of the model. A nomogram incorporating those independent factors was constructed and validated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and a risk stratification system were used to evaluate its clinical value.

Results

A total of 2,367 cases were selected for analysis and randomized to the training cohort (n=1,677) and the validation cohort (n=690). The patients were mainly male (59.3%), married (83.1%) and White (77.3%). Apart from LM, 54.2%, 26.7%, and 36.7% of patients also present with bone, brain, and lung metastases, respectively. The median follow-up was 4.0 months for all patients and 23 months for alive cases. The median OS was 5 months [interquartile range (IQR), 2-11 months]. Sex, age, race, grade, T stage, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy were identified as the independent risk factors of the OS and used to develop the nomogram. The calibration curves exhibited excellent agreement between the predicted and actual survival in both the training and validation set, with a C-index of 0.700 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.684-0.716] and 0.677 (95% CI: 0.653-0.701), respectively. The DCA and the risk classification system further supported that the prediction model was clinically effective.

Conclusions

This is the first study to build a prediction model for NSCLC patients with LM. It aids in treatment decisions, focused care, and physician-patient communication. The global prospective data is needed to further improve this model.

VEGF Inhibitors Improve Survival Outcomes in Patients with Liver Metastases across Cancer Types-A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases are associated with poor prognosis across cancers. Novel treatment strategies to treat patients with liver metastases are needed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in patients with liver metastases across cancers.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase was performed between January 2000 and April 2023. Randomized controlled trials of patients with liver metastases comparing standard of care (systemic therapy or best supportive care) with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors were included in the study. Outcomes reported included progression-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 4445 patients with liver metastases from 25 randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The addition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors to standard systemic therapy or best supportive care was associated with superior progression-free survival (HR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61) and overall survival (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93) in patients with liver metastases. In a subgroup analysis of patients with versus patients without liver metastases, the benefit with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors was more pronounced in the group with liver metastases (HR = 0.44) versus without (HR = 0.57) for progression-free survival, but not for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The addition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors to standard management improved survival outcomes in patients with liver metastasis across cancers.

Modified gefitinib conjugated Fe3O4 NPs for improved delivery of chemo drugs following an image-guided mechanistic study of inner vs. outer tumor uptake for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Gefitinib (GEF) is an FDA-approved anti-cancer drug for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of anticancer drugs is limited due to their non-specificity, lower accumulation at target sites, and systemic toxicity. Herein, we successfully synthesized a modified GEF (mGEF) drug and conjugated to Iron oxide nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) for the treatment of NSCLC via magnetic resonance (MR) image-guided drug delivery. A traditional EDC coupling pathway uses mGEF to directly conjugate to Fe3O4 NPs to overcom the drug leakage issues. As a result, we found in vitro drug delivery on mGEF- Fe3O4 NPs exhibits excellent anticancer effects towards the PC9 cells selectively, with an estimated IC 50 value of 2.0 μM. Additionally, in vivo MRI and PET results demonstrate that the NPs could accumulate in tumor-specific regions with localized cell growth inhibition. Results also revealed that outer tumor region exhibiting a stronger contrast than the tinner tumor region which may due necrosis in inner tumor region. In vivo biodistribution further confirms Fe3O4 NPs are more biocompatible and are excreated after the treatment. Overall, we believe that this current strategy of drug modification combined with chemical conjugation on magnetic NPs will lead to improved cancer chemotherapy as well as understanding the tumor microenvironments for better therapeutic outcomes.

Lipid Nanoparticles-Based Therapy in Liver Metastasis Management: From Tumor Cell-Directed Strategy to Liver Microenvironment-Directed Strategy

Metastasis to the liver, as one of the most frequent metastatic patterns, was associated with poor prognosis. Major drawbacks of conventional therapies in liver metastasis were the lack of metastatic-targeting ability, predominant systemic toxicities and incapability of tumor microenvironment modulations. Lipid nanoparticles-based strategies like galactosylated, lyso-thermosensitive or active-targeting chemotherapeutics liposomes have been explored in liver metastasis management. This review aimed to summarize the state-of-art lipid nanoparticles-based therapies in liver metastasis management. Clinical and translational studies on the lipid nanoparticles in treating liver metastasis were searched up to April, 2023 from online databases. This review focused not only on the updates in drug-encapsulated lipid nanoparticles directly targeting metastatic cancer cells in treating liver metastasis, but more importantly on research frontiers in drug-loading lipid nanoparticles targeting nonparenchymal liver tumor microenvironment components in treating liver metastasis, which showed promise for future clinical oncological practice.

Implications of the Organ-Specific Immune Environment for Immune Priming Effect of Radiotherapy in Metastatic Setting

With the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the tumour immune microenvironment (TIME) has been increasingly considered to improve cancer management. The TIME of metastatic lesions is strongly influenced by the underlying immune contexture of the organ in which they are located. The metastatic location itself appears to be an important prognostic factor in predicting outcomes after ICI treatment in cancer patients. Patients with liver metastases are less likely to respond to ICIs than patients with metastases in other organs, likely due to variations in the metastatic TIME. Combining additional treatment modalities is an option to overcome this resistance. Radiotherapy (RT) and ICIs have been investigated together as an option to treat various metastatic cancers. RT can induce a local and systemic immune reaction, which can promote the patient's response to ICIs. Here, we review the differential impact of the TIME according to metastatic location. We also explore how RT-induced TIME modifications could be modulated to improve outcomes of RT-ICI combinations.

Nivolumab or Atezolizumab in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Prognostic Index Based on Data from Daily Practice

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nivolumab and atezolizumab in advanced pre-treated NSCLC was documented in prospective trials. We aim to confirm the benefits and indicate predictive factors for immunotherapy in daily practice.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis. The median PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression method.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients (ECOG 0-1) with advanced NSCLC (CS III-IV) were eligible to receive nivolumab or atezolizumab as second-line treatment. Median PFS and OS were three months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-3.42) and 10 months (95% CI 8.03-11.96), respectively, for the overall population. The median OS for the atezolizumab arm was eight months (95% CI 5.89-10.1), while for the nivolumab group, it was 14 months (95% CI 10.02-17.97) (p = 0.018). The sum of all measurable changes >100.5 mm (p = 0.007; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005), PLT > 281.5 G/l (p < 0.001; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.003) and bone metastases (p < 0.004; HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.38) were independent negative prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. Based on preliminary analyses, a prognostic index was constructed to obtain three prognostic groups. Median OS in the subgroups was 16 months (95% CI 13.3-18.7), seven months (95% CI 4.83-9.17) and four months (95% CI 2.88-5.13), respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab and atezolizumab provided clinical benefit in real life. Clinical and laboratory factors may help to identify subgroups likely to benefit. The use of prognostic indices may be valuable in clinical practice.

Five-year overall survival with ipilimumab and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for metastatic disease

PURPOSE

Ipilimumab plus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) demonstrate satisfactory short-term clinical benefit and low toxicities in metastatic cancers. Here, we report the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients with metastatic disease treated with this combined-modality therapy in a phase II trial (NCT02239900).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

SABR was delivered to patients with metastatic lesions in the liver and lung either during the first dose (concurrent) or 1 week after the second dose (sequential) of ipilimumab (every 3 weeks for 4 cycles). SABR was administered to liver or lung metastases as 50 Gy in 4 fractions or 60 Gy in 10 fractions, considering the tumor location. The OS rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method; subgroup analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and OS by SABR-targeted lesions (liver/lung) were performed by log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were enrolled in this long-term follow-up analysis. At the median follow-up time of 15.32 months (range, 0.97-82.13 months), the median PFS was 6.52 months (95% CI, 5.86-7.14) and the median OS was 15.32 months (95% CI,13.03-17.23). The 12-, 36-, and 60-month OS rates were 61%, 23%, and 15%, respectively. There was a significant difference in OS between cohorts (P = 0.039), with a stronger response observed in lung-treated subgroups. Patients who had received sequential fractions (50 Gy/4f) to the lung had improved OS compared to those who had received sequential fractions (18.29 vs 8.9 months, P = 0.043) to the liver. Subgroup analysis of SABR-targeted lesions showed that lung-targeted groups had significantly longer PFS (6.87 months vs. 5.63 months, P = 0.034) and OS (18.67 months vs. 13.63 months, P = 0.013) compared to liver-targeted groups. The sequence did not affect the outcomes of PFS and OS. Exploratory analyses showed that SABR-targeted lesions and smoking history comprised an independent risk factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated 5-year OS data from the phase II trial demonstrate the long-term clinical benefit of ipilimumab and SABR, which warrants further research and cumulative data.

Correlation between tumor diameter, distant metastasis site, and survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a malignant disease that spreads quickly. There is limited research on the relationship between tumor diameter and distant metastatic patterns in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between tumor diameter, distant metastasis site, and survival in extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Method

Patients over the age of 18 who applied to Ankara Atatürk Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital with the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer and distant organ metastasis between January 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

The study comprised a total of 178 patients, with 12 women (6.7%) and 166 men (93.3%) participating. The patient was followed for a period of 1 to 36 months, with a median value of 7 months. The univariate model showed that pancreatic metastasis, single metastasis, tumor diameter, and tumor N stage had a significant (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.013, p = 0.001, respectively) effect on survival. The N stage III group’s expected life expectancy [6.8 months (5.8–7.7)] was considerably (p = 0.000) lower than the N stage I–II groups [11.2 months (8.8–13.4)]. The predicted life expectancy for the group with pancreatic metastasis [4.1 months (2.6–5.5)] was significantly (p = 0.001) shorter than that of the group without pancreatic metastasis [8.9 months (7.6–10.1)]. The predicted life expectancy for the group with tumor size > 7 cm [6.7 months (5.4–8.0)] was significantly shorter than that of the group with tumor size of 0–3 cm [10.9 months (7.3–14.6)] (p = 0.019) and 3–7 cm [9.2 months (7.5–11)] (p = 0.023).

Conclusion

The authors of this study found that pancreatic metastasis, single metastasis, tumor diameter, and tumor N stage can be used as independent predictive factors for the survival of SCLC patients.

Will Patients With Liver Metastasis From Aggressives Cancers Benefit From Surgical Resection?

Background

We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of resections for liver metastases (LMs) originating from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophagus/gastric cancers (EGCs), which we label as major killers (MKs; overall survival (OS) under 10%). We hypothesized that LM resection must provide the patient with almost a year of OS postoperatively that is considered beneficial.

Methods

From January 2005 to December 2020, 23 patients underwent resection for isolated LM from MKs. These patients underwent surgery after a multidisciplinary discussion about their performance status, disease evolution during prolonged medical treatment, and the existence or absence of extrahepatic metastases.

Results

LM originated from an PDAC, EGC, or NSCLC in 10 patients (43%), nine patients (39%), and four patients (18%), respectively. The median delay between primary cancer and LM diagnoses was 12 months, and the median delay between LM diagnosis and liver resection was 10 months. Most patients, who had objectively responded to medical treatment (57%), had a solitary (61%) and unilobar (70%) LM. Severe morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 13% and 4.3%, respectively. Margin-free resection was achieved in 16 patients (70%). After liver resection, the median OS was 24 months without a statistical difference when considering the primary tumor site; 1, 3-, and 5-year OS were 70%, 23%, and 23%, respectively.

Conclusion

Selection based on criteria such as good clinical condition, response to treatment, and long observation period helped identify patients with LM of MKs who seemed to benefit from resection.

The effect of organ-specific tumor microenvironments on response patterns to immunotherapy

Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have become widely used in various settings across many different cancer types in recent years. Whilst patients are often treated on the basis of the primary cancer type and clinical stage, recent studies have highlighted disparity in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors at different sites of metastasis, and their impact on overall response and survival. Studies exploring the tumor immune microenvironment at different organ sites have provided insights into the immune-related mechanisms behind organ-specific patterns of response to immunotherapy. In this review, we aimed to highlight the key learnings from clinical studies across various cancers including melanoma, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, breast cancer and others, assessing the association of site of metastasis and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also summarize the key clinical and pre-clinical findings from studies exploring the immune microenvironment of specific sites of metastasis. Ultimately, further characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment at different metastatic sites, and understanding the biological drivers of these differences, may identify organ-specific mechanisms of resistance, which will lead to more personalized treatment approaches for patients with innate or acquired resistance to immunotherapy.

High tumor burden in non-small-cell lung cancer: A review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and the majority of the patients have advanced/metastatic disease on presentation. In clinical practice, several biomarkers and clinical factors are taken into account when choosing the best treatment option in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One potential marker may be tumor burden (TB). However, this concept is not specifically defined in NSCLC, and usually, it is used as a synonymous for aggressive disease.

METHODS

A non-systematic literature review was conducted. We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with a cutoff at February 2021. The keywords included non-small-cell lung cancer, tumor burden, aggressive disease, prognosis biomarker, predictive biomarker, and immunotherapy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This review addresses the definition of TB in advanced NSCLC, the pathophysiology of high TB lesions, and the role of TB as a prognosis biomarker.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

The concept of aggressive disease, as high tumor burden definition, remains poorly defined and rarely considered in clinical research or clinical practice in oncology. The identification of this subgroup of patients could be interesting for defining and optimizing a more aggressive treatment strategy.

Analysis of non-small cell lung cancer with miliary lung metastasis in patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

Miliary lung metastasis is a unique feature of lung metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), indicating hematogenous dissemination. Some studies reported more frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and worse prognosis in these patients. Cases were identified from Chi-Mei medical center cancer registry for the period 2015-2019. Inclusion criteria were NSCLC with contra-lateral lung metastasis harboring EGFR mutation, under tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) prescription. Patients with miliary or non-miliary lung metastasis were enrolled for survival analysis. 182 NSCLC patients were enrolled for assessing time to discontinuation of TKI (TD-TKI), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). 54 patients with miliary lung metastasis had average 13.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.7-15.6] of TD-TKI, 11.4 months (95% CI 9.3-13.6) of PFS, and 21.3 months (95% CI 16.8-25.8) of OS, which were shorter than non-miliary group with marginally statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, miliary lung metastasis had no statistical significance, and other strong prognostic indicators were found including performance status, liver metastasis, EGFR type, and generation of TKI. In NSCLC patients harboring EGRF mutation under TKI prescription, miliary lung metastasis was not a dominant indicator for outcomes evaluation.

Unique diagnostic challenge in surgery: hepatic abscess versus malignancy

A man in his 30s had presented with a history of abdominal pain, vomiting and high-grade fever. He had tender hepatomegaly with peritonism in the upper abdomen. Investigations revealed a neutrophilic leucocytosis, and contrast-enhanced CT had shown several well-defined peripherally enhancing thick-walled cystic lesions with non-enhancing centres throughout the liver suggestive of pyogenic liver abscess, treated initially with antibiotics. However, ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration revealed atypical neoplastic cells, and a trucut biopsy showed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). He developed acute shortness of breath. CT pulmonary angiogram confirmed pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). Incidentally, here we saw a solitary nodule in the right middle lobe, probably a neoplastic lesion. His condition deteriorated rapidly secondary to PTE and died. A pathological review was positive for CK7, p40, p63 and CK19 confirming SCC. We concluded the primary was a pulmonary SCC with multiple hepatic metastases. Hepatic metastases can mimic an abscess; trucut biopsy with immunohistochemistry was critical for a definitive diagnosis.

Salvage chemotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer after prior immunotherapy: a retrospective, real-life experience study

Patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progress with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), salvage chemotherapy remains the only viable option for tumors that do not harbor genomic alterations. Data on the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) are scarce. Our main objective in the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of SCAI. All consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having metastatic NSCLC and received at least one dose of ICIs were retrospectively reviewed. We computed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) with SCAI. We also analyzed associations between survival and various clinicopathologic factors. We identified 35 patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of SCAI. The median age was 66 years. Most of patients were male ( n  = 26, 74.3%) and former or current smokers ( n  = 33, 94.3%). The majority of the patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 2 ( n  = 22; 62.9%), and there were no patients with driver mutations. SCAI was administered as second-line therapy in 21 (60.0%) patients and third-line in 14 (40.0%) patients. The ORR to SCAI was 20.0% with median PFS and OS were 2.43 (95% CI, 1.69-3.16) months and 4.40 (95% CI, 2.17-6.62) months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2 was confirmed as being independently associated with inferior OS. We demonstrated that patients with NSCLC who progressed to ICIs had limited clinical benefit with salvage chemotherapy, particularly for patients who were ECOG PS 2.

The nomogram for the prediction of overall survival in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma undergoing primary site surgery: A retrospective population-based study

Background

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Distant metastasis of lung adenocarcinoma reduces the survival rate. we aim to develop a nomogram in order to predict the survival of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We retrospectively collected patients who were initially diagnosed as metastatic LUAD from 2010 to 2015 from SEER database. Based on the multivariate and univariate Cox regression analysis of the training cohorts, independent prognostic factors were assessed. The nomogram prediction model was then constructed based on these prognostic factors to predict the overall survival at 12, 24 and 36 months after surgery. Nomogram were identified and calibrated by c-index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC) and calibration curve. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to quantify the net benefit of the nomogram at different threshold probabilities, and to better compare with the TNM staging system, we calculated the c-index of this nomogram as well as the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Result

A total of 1102 patients with metastatic LUAD who met the requirements were included for analysis. They were randomly divided into 774 in the training cohorts and 328 in the validation cohorts. As can be seen from the calibration plots, the predicted nomogram and the actual observations in both of the training and validation cohorts were generally consistent. The time dependent AUC values of 12 months, 24 months and 36 months were 0.707, 0.674 and 0.686 in the training cohorts and 0.690, 0.680 and 0.688 in the verification cohorts, respectively. C-indexes for the training and validation cohorts were 0.653 (95%CI 0.626-0.68)and 0.663 (95%CI 0.626-1), respectively. NRI and IDI show that the model is more clinical applicable than the existing staging system. In addition, our risk scoring system based on Kaplan Meier (K-M) survival curve can accurately divide patients into three hierarchy risk groups.

Conclusion

This has led to the development and validation of a prognostic nomogram to assist clinicians in determining the prognosis of patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma after primary site surgery.

Choosing the optimal immunotherapeutic strategies for non-small cell lung cancer based on clinical factors

The treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed dramatically since the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although some patients achieve long survival with relatively mild toxicities, not all patients experience such benefits from ICI treatment. There are several ways to use ICIs in NSCLC patients, including monotherapy, combination immunotherapy, and combination chemoimmunotherapy. Decision-making in the selection of an ICI treatment regimen for NSCLC is complicated partly because of the absence of head-to-head prospective comparisons. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is currently considered a standard biomarker for predicting the efficacy of ICIs, although some limitations exist. In addition to the PD-L1 tumor proportion score, many other clinical factors should also be considered to determine the optimal treatment strategy for each patient, including age, performance status, histological subtypes, comorbidities, status of oncogenic driver mutation, and metastatic sites. Nevertheless, evidence of the efficacy and safety of ICIs with some specific conditions of these factors is insufficient. Indeed, patients with poor performance status, oncogenic driver mutations, or interstitial lung disease have frequently been set as ineligible in randomized clinical trials of NSCLC. ICI use in these patients is controversial and remains to be discussed. It is important to select patients for whom ICIs can benefit the most from these populations. In this article, we review previous reports of clinical trials or experience in using ICIs in NSCLC, focusing on several clinical factors that are associated with treatment outcomes, and then discuss the optimal ICI treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Ovary metastasis from lung cancer mimicking primary ovarian cancer: A rare case report

Introduction

Ovarian metastasis from lung cancer is very rare, which might lead to a misdiagnosis as primary ovarian cancer.

Case presentation

We report a 49-year-old woman presenting to our hospital because of a painful mass in the lower abdomen, with no respiratory symptoms. Her initial diagnosis was stage IVB ovarian cancer with pulmonary metastasis. Therefore, the patient underwent neo-adjuvant Paclitaxel - Carbolatin chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery. However, postoperative histopathology and immunohistochemistry findings confirmed the diagnosis of primary lung cancer with ovarian metastases. EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation was found by tumor analysis. Therefore, she was then treated with erlotinib and the disease achieved the partial response and remained stable for 7 months.

Conclusion

Diagnosis of lung cancer in the context of ovarian and peritoneal metastases can be difficult. In this circumstance, thorough systemic assessment and immunohistochemistry are essential to confirm the primary.

•

Ovarian metastasis from lung cancer is very rare, which might lead to a misdiagnosis as primary ovarian cancer.

•

In this circumstance, thorough systemic assessment and immunohistochemistry are essential to confirm the primary.

•

Our clinical case provides a lesson learned in diagnosing and treating lung cancer, which has a unique and rare clinical presentation.

Incidence and comparative prognosis of cancers with metastasis to noncommon sites: A population-based study

Primary tumors have common sites of metastasis such as lymph nodes, bones, liver, lungs, and brain; however, they can also metastasize to other uncommon sites such as adrenals, bone marrow, and skin among others. Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between uncommon sites of metastasis at the time of diagnosis and median survival in a number of primary tumors using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. This retrospective cohort study conducted between September-October 2021 included patient-level SEER data for 2016-2018 using SEER Research Data, 9 Registries, Nov 2020 Sub (1975-2018). Descriptive analysis for complete cohort and median survival for each primary within the cohort was performed using R software. A total of 25,345 patients (females, 51.4%) were diagnosed with primary tumors with metastasis to uncommon sites at the time of diagnosis; the mean age at diagnosis was 68 years. Lung and bronchus primaries constituted the largest proportion of cohort (41.9%) that metastasized to uncommon sites, followed by nonHodgkin lymphoma-nodal (7.4%), pancreas (6.6%), stomach (3.7%), and ovarian (3.4%). The incidence of metastasis to uncommon sites was most common in respiratory cancers in ages 61-80 years (25%) and least in breast primaries in ages 18-40 years (0.1%), and was higher in Whites compared to other races. Regarding median survival, liver cancer with metastasis to uncommon sites had the worst prognosis (1 month), whereas small intestine tumors were associated with a better prognosis, median survival of 13 months. In this cohort study, the lung and bronchus cancers were the most common primaries metastasized to uncommon sites at diagnosis. The liver tumor had the worst survival compared to other tumors. These findings will help redirect the available screening tools to improve survival in patients with primary tumors with metastasis at diagnosis and may also play an essential role in future research and achieve a better prognosis for cancer patients.

Predictive value of clinical characteristics on risk and prognosis of synchronous brain metastases in small-cell lung cancer patients: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have a high incidence of synchronous brain metastases (SBM) and a poor prognosis, which causes a heavy burden of morbidity and mortality. A better understanding of the demographic and tumor-specific characteristics of these patients is critical to guiding clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive and prognostic value of the clinical characteristics of SCLC patients with SBM at initial diagnosis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study based on the data in the latest Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) version which was released in 2021 for patients diagnosed with SCLC in the presence or absence of SBM from 2010 to 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of the presence of SBM at the initial diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models were built to compare the prognosis of patients with different clinical characteristics and treatments.

RESULTS

A total of 33,169 SCLC patients were enrolled in this study, including 5711 (17.2%) patients with SBM and 27,458 (82.8%) patients without SBM. Patients who are black(HR = 1.313, 95% CI = 1.167-1.478, p < 0.001), higher T stage (T2, HR = 1.193, 95%CI = 1.065-1.348, p = 0.005; T3, HR = 1.169, 95%CI = 1.029-1.327, p = 0.016; T4, HR = 1.259, 95%CI = 1.117-1.418, p < 0.001), lung metastases (HR = 1.434, 95%CI = 1.294-1.588, p < 0.001) and bone metastases (HR = 1.311, 95% CI = 1.205-1.426, p < 0.001) had greater odds of SBM at initial diagnosis. The median overall survival (OS) for SCLC patients with SBM was 5.0 months. Multivariable Cox regression revealed that age ≥ 65 (HR = 1.164, 95% CI = 1.086-1.247, p < 0.025), singled (HR = 1.095, 95% CI = 1.020-1.174, p = 0.012), higher T stage (T3, HR = 1.265, 95% CI = 1.123-1.425, p < 0.001; T4, HR = 1.192, 95% CI = 1.066-1.332, p = 0.002), higher N stage (N2, HR = 1.347, 95%CI = 1.214-1.494, p < 0.001; N3, HR = 1.452, 95%CI = 1.292-1.632, p < 0.001), liver metastases (HR = 1.415, 95%CI = 1.306-1.533, p < 0.001), and bone metastases (adjusted HR = 1.126, 95%CI = 1.039-1.221, p = 0.004). Analysis of treatment regimens showed that patients who received combinational treatment exhibited longer OS than chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone, and surgery combined with chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibited the longest OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we identified risk factors for SBM in SCLC patients and prognostic indicators among this patient population. We also found that patients who received different therapeutic strategies exhibited significant difference on OS, which will provide evidence-based support for treatment options.

Impact of Lung Metastasis versus Metastasis of Bone, Brain, or Liver on Overall Survival and Thyroid Cancer-Specific Survival of Thyroid Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study

We investigate the impact of lung metastasis versus metastasis of bone, brain, or liver on overall survival (OS) and thyroid cancer-specific survival (TCSS) in patients with thyroid cancer (TC). Therefore, de-identified SEER 18 registry data of primary TC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The primary outcome was the prognosis of TC patients with lung metastasis compared with other sites. The secondary outcomes included the prognosis comparison between patients with and without surgery and between single and multiple metastasis sites. Isolated lung metastasis was associated with worse OS and TCSS than bone metastasis (both p < 0.05) and was associated with worse OS than liver metastasis (p = 0.0467). Surgery performed either for the primary or distant site was associated with better OS and TCSS in patients with metastasis of lung or bone (p < 0.05). Isolated lung metastasis was related to better OS and TCSS than lung−liver, lung−brain, and lung−other multiple metastases. The multivariable analysis revealed that age < 55 years, surgery to the primary site, and to the distant site(s) were associated with better outcomes, while T4 and Tx were associated with worse outcomes. Nevertheless, it revealed that the other race (i.e., any race other than white, black, or unknown) and male gender were associated with better TCSS only (p < 0.05). Isolated lung metastasis is associated with a worse prognosis in TC patients compared with bone or liver metastasis. Surgery performed either for the primary or distant site(s) is associated with better survival outcomes in TC patients with metastasis of lung or bone.

Efficacy of Atezolizumab for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Clinical and Molecular Features: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

Atezolizumab is becoming a significant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its efficacy needs to be further improved. The aims of this study are to clarify the potency of atezolizumab-based therapy in advanced NSCLC patients with different clinical and molecular features, and to choose a better therapeutic regimen of atezolizumab to achieve more precise treatment in immunotherapy.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase Science Direct, and Google Scholar, together with major oncology conferences that compared atezolizumab with chemotherapy-based treatment for individuals with advanced NSCLC published prior to February 2022, were searched. Studies, bias risk assessment, and data extraction were selected by two independent authors. We extracted the basic features of the included studies, together with the 95% confidence interval (CI) and hazard ratios (HRs), from all patients and subgroups. The combined treatment data were assessed using the inverse variance weighting method.

Results

Seven RCTs including 4,859 patients were included. Our meta-analysis findings indicated that atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77–0.88; p < 0.00001) and PFS (HR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61–0.85; p < 0.0001) in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with chemotherapy-based treatment. Atezolizumab substantially enhanced OS in patients aged <65 years old and 65–74 years old, those with wild-type EGFR, those without liver metastases, active or previous smokers, white patients and those with TC3 or IC3, TC2/3 or IC2/3, TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3, and TC0 and IC0, but not in patients aged ≥75 years, never smokers, those with liver metastases, those with EGFR mutant, Asians, Black or African Americans, or those with TC1/2 or IC1/2. Patients with advanced NSCLC who received atezolizumab showed OS improvement regardless of sex (male or female), histological type (non-squamous or squamous NSCLC), performance status (0 or 1), and line of treatment (1st-line therapy or ≥2nd-line therapy). Subgroup analysis revealed that male individuals, those with non-squamous NSCLC, those with PS 1, active or previous smokers, and those with wild-type EGFR, TC3 or IC3, and TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 achieved OS benefit from atezolizumab treatment not related to the treatment line and treatment regimen.

Conclusions

Age group, smoking history, liver metastasis status, EGFR mutation status, race, and PD-L1 expression can be used to predict the potency of atezolizumab and provide a better treatment regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC to achieve accurate and personalized treatment.

When to add anti-angiogenesis drugs to EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: a real-world study from Taiwan

Background

The addition of anti-angiogenesis drugs to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) or chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can improve disease control. We conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapeutic strategies and identify patients who could benefit from combination therapy.

Methods

This study enrolled patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR-TKIs between January 2014 and December 2020. We divided patients into three groups: patients who received an anti-angiogenesis drug as first-line combination therapy, those who received an anti-angiogenesis drug as further-line combination therapy, and those with no anti-angiogenesis therapy.

Results

A total of 204 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) in patients receiving first-line anti-angiogenesis plus EGFR-TKI combination therapy was longer (18.2 months) than those treated with first-line EGFR-TKI monotherapy (10.0 months for both, p < 0.001). No difference in overall survival (OS) was observed among these three groups (30.5 vs. 42.6 vs. 33.7 months, p = 0.326). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed L858R mutation, pleural, liver, and bone metastasis as independent prognostic factors for poor OS. However, the addition of anti-angiogenesis therapy to patients with these poor prognostic factors improved OS to levels similar to those without these poor prognostic factors.

Conclusion

First-line combination EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenesis therapy improves PFS in patients with stage IV EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Adding an anti-angiogenesis drug at any line to patients harboring L858R mutation with pleural, liver, or bone metastases can provide survival benefits.

Heterogeneity of neuroendocrine transcriptional states in metastatic small cell lung cancers and patient-derived models

Molecular subtypes of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) defined by the expression of key transcription regulators have recently been proposed in cell lines and limited number of primary tumors. The clinical and biological implications of neuroendocrine (NE) subtypes in metastatic SCLC, and the extent to which they vary within and between patient tumors and in patient-derived models is not known. We integrate histology, transcriptome, exome, and treatment outcomes of SCLC from a range of metastatic sites, revealing complex intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity of NE differentiation. Transcriptomic analysis confirms previously described subtypes based on ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, YAP1, and ATOH1 expression, and reveal a clinical subtype with hybrid NE and non-NE phenotypes, marked by chemotherapy-resistance and exceedingly poor outcomes. NE tumors are more likely to have RB1, NOTCH, and chromatin modifier gene mutations, upregulation of DNA damage response genes, and are more likely to respond to replication stress targeted therapies. In contrast, patients preferentially benefited from immunotherapy if their tumors were non-NE. Transcriptional phenotypes strongly skew towards the NE state in patient-derived model systems, an observation that was confirmed in paired patient-matched tumors and xenografts. We provide a framework that unifies transcriptomic and genomic dimensions of metastatic SCLC. The marked differences in transcriptional diversity between patient tumors and model systems are likely to have implications in development of novel therapeutic agents.

Construction and validation of a nomogram for non small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastases based on a population analysis

Lung cancer is one of the most common malignancies in the United States, and the common metastatic sites in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are bone, brain, adrenal gland, and liver, respectively, among which patients with liver metastases have the worst prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed 1963 patients diagnosed with NSCLC combined with liver metastases between 2010 and 2015. Independent prognostic factors for patients with liver metastases from NSCLC were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Based on this, we developed a nomogram model via R software and evaluated the performance and clinical utility of the model by calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The independent prognostic factors for NSCLC patients with liver metastases included age, race, gender, grade, T stage, N stage, brain metastases, bone metastases, surgery, chemotherapy, and tumor size. The area under the curve predicting OS at 6, 9, and 12 months was 0.793, 0.787, and 0.784 in the training cohort, and 0.767, 0.771, and 0.773 in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration curves of the nomogram showed high agreement between the outcomes predicted by the nomogram and the actual observed outcomes, and the DCA further demonstrated the value of the clinical application of the nomogram. By analyzing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we established and verified a prognostic nomogram for NSCLC patients with liver metastases, to personalize the prognosis of patients. At the same time, the prognostic nomogram has a satisfactory accuracy and the results are a guide for the development of patient treatment plans.

Incidence and survival outcomes of secondary liver cancer: a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis

Background

The global incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer, which is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, are increasing. However, information on its epidemiology and clinical prognosis is limited. This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology and prognostic factors of secondary liver cancer to aid in the pretreatment evaluation of the disease.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with secondary liver cancer between 2010 and 2014 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively included. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to screen for significant factors associated with secondary liver cancer.

Results

A total of 85,738 secondary liver cancer patients were identified; in this population, the first primary site was the lung (25.9%), followed by the colorectum, pancreas, stomach, breast, and cecum. Patients with primary tumors of the colorectum, cecum and breast had longer median survival time. Advanced age, male gender, black race, poor differentiation or lack of differentiation, regional lymph node metastases, and presence of distant metastasis were associated with poor prognosis.

Conclusions

In this study, novel findings on the role of the primary site and synchronous distant metastasis to specific organs in patients with secondary liver cancer were described. These findings have significant implications in clinical diagnosis and treatment, and provide a better understanding of secondary liver cancer in the general population.

Prognosis and survival analysis of patients with pancreatic cancer: retrospective experience of a single institution

Background

The overall survival of patients  with pancreatic cancer is extremely low. Despite multiple large-scale studies, identification of predictors of patient survival remains challenging. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The clinical data of 625 patients with pancreatic cancer treated at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2013 to December 2017 were collected.

Results

Of 625 patients, 569 were followed from 1 to 75 months. The median overall survival was 9.3 months. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 37.8%, 15.1%, and 10.5%, respectively. Cox proportional hazards model indicated that baseline carbohydrate antigen 199 level, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, operative procedure, lymph node metastasis, number of distant organ metastasis, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic cancer. Baseline carbohydrate antigen 199 level, degree of weight loss, operative procedure, lymph node metastasis, number of distant organ metastasis, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of pancreatic head cancer subgroup. Baseline carbohydrate antigen 199 level, carcinoembryonic antigen level, total bilirubin level, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, peripancreatic invasion, number of distant organ metastasis, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of the pancreatic body/tail cancer subgroup.

Conclusions

Higher carbohydrate antigen 199 levels, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymph node metastasis and distant organ metastasis predict a poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Early detection, early radical surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy are needed to improve prognosis for this deadly disease.

Anlotinib for patients with small cell lung cancer and baseline liver metastases: A post hoc analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Liver metastasis is common in advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is no evidence-proven treatment beyond the second line in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis. This study aimed to investigate survival in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis treated with anlotinib compared with placebo. This study was a post hoc analysis of the phase II ALTER 1202 trial, including patients who had liver metastasis at baseline. The participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either 12 mg/day anlotinib (anlotinib group) or placebo (placebo group). Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. In the original trial, there were 39 participants with liver metastasis at baseline, including 27 and 12 in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively. The objective response rate was 3.7% and 0% in the anlotinib and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.9999). An elevated disease control rate was found in the anlotinib group (44.4%) compared with the placebo group (8.3%, p = 0.0173). The median PFS was 1.51 vs. 0.71 months in favor of anlotinib (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.78; p = 0.0064), with no marked difference in median OS (3.29 vs. 1.91 months; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.22-1.16; p = 0.0996). The most common AEs in the anlotinib group were hypertension (40.7%), fatigue (29.6%), loss of appetite (22.2%), and weight loss (22.2%). There were no grade 5 AE. In conclusion, anlotinib increased PFS compared with placebo in patients with SCLC and liver metastasis.

The construction and analysis of ceRNA network and patterns of immune infiltration in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Competitive Endogenous RNA (ceRNA) may be closely associated with tumor progression. However, studies on ceRNAs and immune cells in LUAD are scarce.

METHOD

The profiles of gene expression and clinical data of LUAD patients were extracted from the TCGA database. Bioinformatics methods were used to evaluate differentially-expressed genes (DEGs) and to form a ceRNA network. Preliminary verification of clinical specimens was utilized to detect the expressions of key biomarkers at the tissues. Cox and Lasso regressions were used to identify key genes, and prognosis prediction nomograms were formed. The mRNA levels of 9 genes in the risk score model in independent clinical LUAD samples were detected by qRT-PCR. The interconnection between the risk of cancer and immune cells was evaluated using the CIBERSORT algorithm, while the conformation of notable tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) in the LUAD tissues of the high and low risk groups was assessed using the RNA transcript subgroup in order to identify tissue types. Finally, co-expression study was used to examine the interconnection between the key genes in the ceRNA networks and the immune cells.

RESULT

A ceRNA network of 115 RNAs was established, and nine key genes were identified to construct a Cox proportional-hazard model and create a prognostic nomogram. This risk-assessment model might serve as an independent factor to forecast the prognosis of LUAD, and it was consistent with the preliminary verification of clinical specimens. Survival analysis of clinical samples further validated the potential value of high risk groups in predicting LUAD prognosis. Five immune cells were identified with significant differences in the LUAD tissues of the high and low risk groups. Besides, two pairs of biomarkers associated with the growth of LUAD were found, i.e., E2F7 and macrophage M1 (R = 0.419, p = 1.4e- 08) and DBF4 and macrophage M1 (R = 0.282, p < 2.2 e- 16).

CONCLUSION

This study identified several important ceRNAs, i.e. (E2F7 and BNF4) and TIICs (macrophage M1), which might be related to the development and prognosis of LUAD. The established risk-assessment model might be a potential tool in predicting LUAD of prognosis.

Diagnostic and prognostic nomograms for bone metastasis in small cell lung cancer

Objective

Patients with bone metastasis (BM) of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) have a poor prognosis. We aimed to identify predictors and prognostic factors in patients with BM of SCLC and construct nomograms to predict BM.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 18,187 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database reported between 2010 and 2016. Differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were evaluated after propensity score matching. Independent predictors for BM and prognostic factors for patients with BM of SCLC were determined using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Two nomograms were constructed and evaluated using C-statistics.

Results

BM was observed in 4014 (22.07%) patients. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences between BM and non-BM groups. The median OS for patients with and without BM was 6 and 7 months, respectively. The median CSS for patients with and without BM was 9 and 13 months, respectively. Age, sex, tumor size, N stage, chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and liver/brain/lung metastases were related to BM and independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS. Diagnostic and prognostic nomograms were generated.

Conclusion

Our nomograms predicted the incidence of BM and the 5-month survival rate of patients with SCLC and BM.

Clinical Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients with Liver Metastases: A Network Meta-Analysis of Nine Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with liver metastases.

Materials and Methods

English literature was retrieved from the PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) databases from January 2015 to January 2021. We pooled the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) using a network meta-analysis and ranked treatments by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Publication bias was evaluated by Begg's and Egger's tests. STATA15.0 was used for the sensitivity analysis, and the remaining statistical analyses were performed using R 4.0.2.

Results

Nine eligible phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, including 1,141 patients with liver metastases. Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy ranked highest, followed by atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy and nivolumab. However, no significant difference in OS rates was observed across these three treatments (HR, 0.98; 95% CI: 0.43-2.22 for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs. atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy; HR, 0.91; 95% CI: 0.52-1.57 for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy vs. nivolumab). Regarding the PFS rate, atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy ranked highest and no significant difference was observed between them (HR, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.36-1.70 for atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab + chemotherapy).

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab + chemotherapy, atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy, and nivolumab were superior to other treatments in NSCLC patients with liver metastases. These new findings may help clinicians better select therapeutic strategies for NSCLC patients with liver metastases.

Construction and Validation of a Novel Nomogram to Predict the Overall Survival of Patients With Combined Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Population-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC) represents a rare subtype of all small cell lung cancer cases, with limited studies investigated its prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to construct a novel nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with C-SCLC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 588 C-SCLC patients were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify optimal prognostic variables and construct the nomogram, with concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curves, and calibration curves being used to evaluate its discrimination and calibration abilities. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI) were also adopted to assess its clinical utility and predictive ability compared with the classic TNM staging system.

RESULTS

Seven independent predictive factors were identified to construct the nomogram, including T stage, N stage, M stage, brain metastasis, liver metastasis, surgery, and chemotherapy. We observed a higher C-index in both the training (.751) and validation cohorts (.736). The nomogram has higher area under the curve in predicting 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-, and 36-month survival probability of patients with C-SCLC. Meanwhile, the calibration curves also revealed high consistencies between the actual and predicted OS. DCA revealed that the nomogram could provide greater clinical net benefits to these patients. We found that the NRI for 6- and 12-month OS were .196 and .225, and the IDI for 6- and 12-month OS were .217 and .156 in the training group, suggesting that the nomogram can predict a more accurate survival probability. Similar results were also observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSION

We developed and verified a novel nomogram that can help clinicians recognize high-risk patients with C-SCLC and predict their OS.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain

INTRODUCTION

Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab+bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ACP) vs bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP).

METHODS

Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to ABCP, ACP or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was assessed in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases was assessed in ITT patients.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 months), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI: 0.31-1.14; prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not show survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; prior TKI: HR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. While not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed TTD was seen with ABCP vs BCP (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

This final exploratory analysis showed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with prior TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

Metastatic disease to the liver: Locoregional therapy strategies and outcomes

Secondary cancers of the liver are more than twenty times more common than primary tumors and are incurable in most cases. While surgical resection and systemic chemotherapy are often the first-line therapy for metastatic liver disease, a majority of patients present with bilobar disease not amenable to curative local resection. Furthermore, by the time metastasis to the liver has developed, many tumors demonstrate a degree of resistance to systemic chemotherapy. Fortunately, catheter-directed and percutaneous locoregional approaches have evolved as major treatment modalities for unresectable metastatic disease. These novel techniques can be used for diverse applications ranging from curative intent for small localized tumors, downstaging of large tumors for resection, or locoregional control and palliation of advanced disease. Their use has been associated with increased tumor response, increased disease-free and overall survival, and decreased morbidity and mortality in a broad range of metastatic disease. This review explores recent advances in liver-directed therapies for metastatic liver disease from primary colorectal, neuroendocrine, breast, and lung cancer, as well as uveal melanoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and sarcoma. Therapies discussed include bland transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, radioembolization, and ablative therapies, with a focus on current treatment approaches, outcomes of locoregional therapy, and future directions in each type of metastatic disease.

Single-agent carboplatin in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer patient with liver failure: a case report within the experience of a single institution

Until recently, platinum-based chemotherapy has represented the benchmark for the treatment of extensive disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC). ED-SCLC patients are often diagnosed with poor performance status (PS ≥2) and/or compromised organ functions. In fact, up to 63% of ED-SCLC has extensive liver involvement at diagnosis, which correlates with a poor prognosis. Whether to treat patients with tumor-related organ failure is still debated and the selection of those who could benefit from chemotherapy is crucial. Moreover, severe liver impairment contraindicates the administration of etoposide. Among 74 consecutive ED-SCLC patients followed at our institution from January 2017 to November 2019, three patients received single-agent carboplatin as a first-line treatment due to liver failure. We provide a brief description of a former heavy smoker 70-year-old man who was diagnosed with ED-SCLC and severe liver involvement leading to liver failure. The patient received a first-line treatment with single-agent carboplatin, obtaining a partial response, clinical benefit and the normalization of laboratory test, which documented the complete recovery of liver function. The intent of our work is to highlight the feasibility of single-agent carboplatin in ED-SCLC patients with tumor-related hepatic failure but preserved Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, suggesting that this therapeutic option should not be discouraged a priori. Indeed, the identification of specific tools guiding physicians in the selection of patients who might benefit from the treatment is remarkably needed; meanwhile, the use of available prognostic score (e.g. Manchester score) might be of great value and should be considered in clinical practice.

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies Liver Metastases as Negative Predictive Factor for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of liver metastases (LM) in patients with various advanced cancers received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). First, clinical and survival data from a published cohort of 1,661 patients who received ICIs therapy were downloaded and analyzed. Second, a retrospective review of 182 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy was identified. Third, a meta-analysis of published trials was performed to explore the impact of LM on the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 based therapy in advanced lung cancers. Pan-cancer analysis revealed that patients with LM had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without LM (10 vs. 20 months; P < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that the presence of LM was associated with markedly shorter OS than those without LM in ICI monotherapy group (P < 0.0001), but it did not reach the statistical significance in ICI-based combination therapy (P = 0.0815). In NSCLC, the presence of LM was associated with significantly inferior treatment outcomes in both pan-cancer and real-world cohort. Interestingly, ICI-based monotherapy and combination therapy could simultaneously prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and OS than chemotherapy in patients without LM. However, ICI-based monotherapy could not prolong PFS than chemotherapy in patients with LM while ICI-based combination therapy could dramatically prolong both PFS and OS. Together, these findings suggested that the presence of LM was the negative predictive factor in cancer patients received ICIs monotherapy, especially in NSCLC. ICI-based combination therapy might overcome the intrinsic resistance of LM to ICIs while the optimal combinatorial strategies remain under further investigation.

"High Tumor Burden" in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Defining the Concept

Purpose

Identifying patient characteristics that define a worse disease prognosis or "high tumor burden" (HTB) status is essential for clinical decision-making and treatment selection in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). We aimed to define this concept based on the experience of oncologists in clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

A representative sample of Spanish experts was selected and asked to complete an online survey regarding the definition of HTB according to their personal experience.

Results

HTB was identified by the oncologists (N = 81) as one of the principle factors influencing first-line treatment decision-making. According to the experts, HTB is mainly defined by the number of metastatic lesions (n = 45, 56%), location (n = 34, 42%), tumor size (sum of diameters of target lesions; n = 26, 32%) and liver involvement (n = 24, 30). High lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were also associated with HTB. Almost half of respondents (n = 33, 41%) believed that one metastatic lesion was sufficient to consider a patient as presenting HTB, 72% (n = 58) considered that two were necessary and 99% (n = 80) three. Liver (n = 76, 100%) followed by brain (n = 65, 86%) were the main metastatic sites associated with HTB. Tumor size ranging from 6 cm to 10 cm as well as high LDH levels (three times the upper limit) defined the concept for 82% (n = 62) and 100% (n = 76) of oncologists, respectively.

Conclusion

In the real-world setting, according to experts, HTB is defined by the number of metastatic lesions, location of metastases, tumor size and by high LDH levels. Given the relevance of this concept, efforts should be made to unify its definition and to further explore its potential as a prognostic factor for mNSCLC patients.

Early Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with High PD-L1 Treated with Pembrolizumab in First-Line Setting: A Prognostic Scoring System Based on Clinical Features

BACKGROUND

Pembrolizumab is approved in monotherapy for the first-line (1L) of advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 (≥50%). Despite a proportion of patients achieve long-term survival, about one-third of patients experience detrimental survival outcomes, including early death, hyperprogression, and fast progression. The impact of clinical factors on early progression (EP) development has not been widely explored.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective, multicenter study involving five Italian centers, in patients with metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, treated with Pembrolizumab in a 1L setting. EP was defined as a progressive disease within three months from pembrolizumab initiation. Baseline clinical factors of patients with and without EP were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression was performed to identify clinical factors associated with EP and an EP prognostic score was developed based on the logistic model.

RESULTS

Overall, 321 out of 336 NSCLC patients treated with 1L pembrolizumab provided all the data for the analysis. EP occurred in 137 (42.7%) patients; the median PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.9-4.7), and median OS was not reached in the entire study population. Sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), steroids, metastatic sites ≥2, and the presence of liver/pleural metastasis were confirmed as independent factors for EP by multivariate analysis. By combining these factors, we developed an EP prognostic score ranging from 0-13, with three-risk group stratification: 0-2 (good prognosis), 3-6 (intermediate prognosis), and 7-13 (poor prognosis). The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified six clinical factors independently associated with EP. We developed a prognostic score model for EP-risk to potentially improve clinical practice and patient selection for 1L pembrolizumab in NSCLC with high PD-L1, in the real-world clinical setting.

Different prognostic implications of hepatic metastasis according to front-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study

Background

Although liver metastasis occurs in approximately 15% of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor prognosis, its prognostic effect in patients who receive immunotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to verify the effects of liver metastasis on the prognosis of metastatic NSCLC patients according to their first-line treatment.

Methods

Patients who were initially diagnosed with stage 4 NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2019 were analyzed in this retrospective real-world data-based study. The patients were divided into three groups according to the type of first-line chemotherapy they received: cytotoxic, targeted, and immunotherapy. Prognosis was then compared depending on the presence of liver metastasis in each treatment group.

Results

Among the 1,470 patients, 723 (49.2%) received cytotoxic chemotherapy, 678 (46.1%) received targeted therapy, and 69 (4.7%) received immunotherapy as their first-line chemotherapy. A total of 234 (15.9%) patients had liver metastasis at the initial diagnosis. The mean patient age was 63.7 years, and 59.1% were male. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) in the immunotherapy group in patients with or without liver metastasis (11.7 vs. 13.0 months, P=0.968); however, patients with liver metastasis had worse outcomes in the cytotoxic and targeted therapy groups compared to patients without liver metastasis. Furthermore, in patients with liver metastasis, the immunotherapy group had a longer OS than the cytotoxic chemotherapy group (11.7 vs. 4.4 months, P<0.001). Liver metastasis was associated with poor outcomes (hazard ratio of 1.438), as were age, male sex, bone, adrenal gland, or soft tissue metastasis, and three or more metastatic sites; however, lymph node, brain, collateral lung, and pleura metastasis did not affect prognosis.

Conclusions

Although liver metastasis was associated with poor outcomes, it did not affect prognosis in patients who received immunotherapy.

Prognostic factor analysis of patients with small cell lung cancer: Real-world data from 988 patients

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by aggressive spread and poor prognosis, but has limited treatment options. Results of prognostic factors from randomized trials on treatment arrangement are conflicting and large‐scale real‐world analysis is lacking.

Methods

Patients diagnosed SCLC between 2008 and 2018 in Peking University Cancer Hospital were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier methods were adopted, and univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression models were constructed to analyze prognostic factors.

Results

Among 1045 patients who presented to our center, 988 eligible patients were identified. Median overall survival (OS) was 16.0 months for the whole group, 24.0 months and 11.0 months for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS‐SCLC) and extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC), separately. Limited‐stage, good performance status (PS) (ECOG 0–1), response to primary systemic treatment, and patients who received initiative irradiation and three or more lines of chemotherapy were predicted to have better OS in the whole group. Only response to first‐line systemic therapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were independent prognostic factors of survival in LS‐SCLC; while good PS (ECOG 0–1), without liver, bone, or subcutaneous metastases, response to first‐line therapy, initial local irradiation, and three or more lines of systemic therapy predicted a favorable prognosis in ES‐SCLC.

Conclusions

The present study retrieved from large real–world data suggested that response to primary systemic therapy and aggressive radiotherapy are independent prognostic factors for SCLC. PCI and initiative irradiation for original or metastatic sites improved the OS in LS‐SCLC and ES‐SCLC, respectively.

Impact of docetaxel plus ramucirumab on metastatic site in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

Background

Docetaxel (DOC) plus ramucirumab (RAM) has been recommended as an optimal therapy for previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a clinical setting, there are few reports about DOC plus RAM, therefore its effect on factors such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) and metastatic sites is still unknown.

Methods

We recruited NSCLC patients who received DOC plus RAM in four medical facilities in Japan from June 2016 to March 2020. We retrospectively investigated the overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of DOC plus RAM and conducted univariate and multivariate analyses using PFS as a dependent factor. Patients were followed up until June 30, 2020.

Results

A total of 237 patients were consecutively enrolled. For all patients, the ORR, DCR, and median PFS were 25.2%, 63.9%, and 4.5 months, respectively. The ORR and DCR for malignant pleural effusion (MPE), lung metastasis, and liver metastasis were 7.7% and 53.8%, 30.3% and 77.5%, and 48.6% and 71.4%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, MPE, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis were not prognostic factors for poor PFS. However, ECOG-PS 2 or more [hazard ratio (HR): 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14–2.40, P=0.008] and brain metastasis (HR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.23–2.37, P=0.001) were significant and independent factors associated with shorter PFS.

Conclusions

DOC plus RAM could be an optimal therapy for previous treated NSCLC patients with lung and liver metastasis, and furthermore, should be used carefully for patients with poor ECOG-PS or brain metastasis.

Keywords

Docetaxel and ramucirumab; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); metastatic site; poor performance status