The impact of primary tumor location on efficacy of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with different Kras status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Model-informed Evidence for Clinical Non-inferiority of Every-2-Weeks Versus Standard Weekly Dosing Schedule of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Cetuximab was initially developed and approved as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for weekly administration (250 mg/m2 Q1W with 400 mg/m2 loading dose). An every-2-weeks schedule (500 mg/m2 Q2W) was approved recently by several health authorities. Being synchronized with chemotherapy, Q2W administration should improve patients' convenience and healthcare resource utilization. Herein, we present evidence of non-inferiority of Q2W cetuximab, compared with Q1W dosing using pharmacometrics modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS). Pooled data from five phase I-III clinical trials in 852 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC treated with Q1W or Q2W cetuximab were modeled using a population exposure-tumor size (TS) model linked to overall survival (OS); exposure was derived from a previously established population pharmacokinetic model. A semi-mechanistic TS model adapted from the Claret model incorporated killing rate proportional to cetuximab area under the concentration-time curve over 2 weeks (AUC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status as covariate on baseline TS. The OS was modeled with Weibull hazard using ECOG, baseline TS, primary tumor location, and predicted percent change in TS at 8 weeks as covariates. Model-based simulations revealed indistinguishable early tumor shrinkage and survival between Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab. CTS evaluated OS non-inferiority (predefined margin of 1.25) in 1,000 trials, each with 2,000 virtual patients receiving Q2W or Q1W cetuximab (1:1), and demonstrated non-inferiority in 94% of cases. Taken together, these analyses provide model-based evidence for clinical non-inferiority of Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab in mCRC with potential benefits to patients and healthcare providers.

Overview of the New Bioactive Heterocycles as Targeting Topoisomerase Inhibitors Useful Against Colon Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer globally, with high mortality. Metastatic CRC is incurable in most cases, and multiple drug therapy can increase patients' life expectancy by 2 to 3 years. Efforts are being made to understand the relationship between topoisomerase enzymes and colorectal cancer. Some studies have shown that higher expression of these enzymes is correlated to a poor prognosis for this type of cancer. One of the primary drugs used in the treatment of CRC is Irinotecan, which can be used in monotherapy or, more commonly, in therapeutic schemes such as FOLFIRI (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan) and CAPIRI (Capecitabine and Irinotecan). Like Camptothecin, Irinotecan and other compounds have a mechanism of action based on the formation of a ternary complex with topoisomerase I and DNA providing damage to it, therefore leading to cell death. Thus, this review focused on the principal works published in the last ten years that demonstrate a correlation between the inhibition of different isoforms of topoisomerase and in vitro cytotoxic activity against CRC by natural products, semisynthetic and synthetic compounds of pyridine, quinoline, acridine, imidazoles, indoles, and metal complexes. The results revealed that natural compounds, semisynthetic and synthetic derivatives showed potential in vitro cytotoxicity against several colon cancer cell lines, and this activity was often accompanied by the ability to inhibit both isoforms of topoisomerase (I and II), highlighting that these enzymes can be promising targets for the development of new chemotherapy against CRC. Pyridine analogs were considered the most promising for this study, while the evaluation of the real potential of natural products was limited by the lack of information in their work. Moreover, the complexes, although promising, presented as the main limitation the lack of selectivity.

Real-World Utilization, Barriers, and Factors Associated With the Targeted Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients in China: A Multi-Center, Hospital-Based Survey Study

Objectives: To explore the utilization, barriers, and factors associated with the targeted treatment of Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. Methods: A total of 1,688 mCRC patients from 19 hospitals in 14 cities were enrolled from March 2020 to March 2021 using stratified, multistage cluster sampling. The use of targeted therapy and any barriers patients experienced were collected. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the factors associated with initiating targeted treatment. Results: About 51.6% of the patients initiated targeted therapy, of whom 44.5%, 20.2%, and 35.2% started first-, second-, and third-line treatment, respectively. The most reported barriers were high medical costs and a lack of belief in the efficacy of targeted therapy. Patients treated in the general hospital, diagnosed at an older age, less educated, and who had a lower family income, no medical insurance, poor health-related quality of life, metastasis outside the liver/lung or systemic metastasis, a shorter duration of mCRC were less likely to initiate targeted therapy. Conclusion: Reduced medical costs and interventional education to improve public awareness could facilitate the use of targeted treatment for mCRC.

Chemokine Receptors CCR6 and PD1 Blocking scFv E27 Enhances Anti-EGFR CAR-T Therapeutic Efficacy in a Preclinical Model of Human Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, a therapeutic agent for solid tumors, are not completely effective due to a lack of infiltration of T cells into the tumor site and immunity caused by Programmed Death Receptor 1(PD1). Here, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) CAR-T cell was engineered to express the chemokine receptor CCR6 and secrete PD1 blocking Single-chain antibody fragment (scFv) E27 to enhance their anti-tumor effects. The findings showed that CCR6 enhanced the migration of EGFR CAR-E27-CCR6 T cells in vitro by the Transwell migration assay. When incubated with tumor cells, EGFR CAR-E27-CCR6 T cells specifically exerted potent cytotoxicity and produced high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ). A non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cell line-derived xenograft model was constructed by implanting modified A549 cell lines into immunodeficient NOD.PrkdcscidIl2rgem1/Smoc (NSG) mice. In comparison with traditional EGFR CAR-T cells, live imaging indicated that EGFR CAR-E27-CCR6 T cells displayed superior anti-tumor function. In addition, the histopathological examination of mouse organs showed no obvious organic damage. Our findings confirmed that PD1 blocking and CCR6 can enhance the anti-tumor function of EGFR CAR-T cells in an NSCLC xenograft model, providing an effective treatment strategy to improve the efficacy of CAR-T in NSCLC.

Tumor Biomarker Testing for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Canadian Consensus Practice Guideline

The systemic therapy management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has evolved from primarily cytotoxic chemotherapies to now include targeted agents given alone or in combination with chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A better understanding of the pathogenesis and molecular drivers of colorectal cancer not only aided the development of novel targeted therapies but led to the discovery of tumor mutations which act as predictive biomarkers for therapeutic response. Mutational status of the KRAS gene became the first genomic biomarker to be established as part of standard of care molecular testing, where KRAS mutations within exons 2, 3, and 4 predict a lack of response to anti- epidermal growth factor receptor therapies. Since then, several other biomarkers have become relevant to inform mCRC treatment; however, there are no published Canadian guidelines which reflect the current standards for biomarker testing. This guideline was developed by a pan-Canadian advisory group to provide contemporary, evidence-based recommendations on the minimum acceptable standards for biomarker testing in mCRC, and to describe additional biomarkers for consideration.

Tetraspanin 6 is a regulator of carcinogenesis in colorectal cancer

Tetraspanin protein (Tspan6) is a member of the tetraspanin family. Using a combination of in vitro and in vivo assays, we demonstrate that Tspan6 functions as a tumor suppressor in colorectal cancer (CRC) by attenuating the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–based signaling axis. Tspan6 forms a tripartite complex with transmembrane form of TGF-α and an adaptor protein syntenin-1 and negatively regulates secretion of TGF-α. The expression of Tspan6 is frequently decreased in CRC, and this correlates with poor survival. Importantly, the expression of Tspan6 in CRC correlated independently of tumor molecular profile with better patient responses to Cetuximab, an EGFR-targeted therapy. These results identify Tspan6 as a regulator of CRC development and a potential predictive biomarker for EGFR-targeted therapies.

Early stages of colorectal cancer (CRC) development are characterized by a complex rewiring of transcriptional networks resulting in changes in the expression of multiple genes. Here, we demonstrate that the deletion of a poorly studied tetraspanin protein Tspan6 in Apc^min/+ mice, a well-established model for premalignant CRC, resulted in increased incidence of adenoma formation and tumor size. We demonstrate that the effect of Tspan6 deletion results in the activation of EGF-dependent signaling pathways through increased production of the transmembrane form of TGF-α (tmTGF-α) associated with extracellular vesicles. This pathway is modulated by an adaptor protein syntenin-1, which physically links Tspan6 and tmTGF-α. In support of this, the expression of Tspan6 is frequently decreased or lost in CRC, and this correlates with poor survival. Furthermore, the analysis of samples from the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–targeting clinical trial (COIN trial) has shown that the expression of Tspan6 in CRC correlated with better patient responses to EGFR-targeted therapy involving Cetuximab. Importantly, Tspan6-positive patients with tumors in the proximal colon (right-sided) and those with KRAS mutations had a better response to Cetuximab than the patients that expressed low Tspan6 levels. These results identify Tspan6 as a regulator of CRC development and a potential predictive marker for EGFR-targeted therapies in CRC beyond RAS pathway mutations.

Immunotherapy in microsatellite instability metastatic colorectal cancer: Current status and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent and deadly malignancies worldwide. This specific pathology is composed of various molecular entities, with distinct immunological phenotypes. In addition to KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation status, other druggable alterations such as those in HER2, MET, NTRK, ALK, and ROS1 have been identified in recent years offering new therapeutic options for some patients with CRC.

AIM

This review will focus on the molecular biology, immunological fingerprints, and current clinical evidence for the use of immunotherapy in patients with CRC.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

High microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mutations in mismatch repair genes constitute a new molecular entity within CRC, which is characterized by a high mutational and neoantigen burden, frequent immune cell infiltration, and where immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown high response and survival rates compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) tumors. Indeed, the approval of pembrolizumab in MSI-H tumors was the first agnostic FDA approval in solid tumors. While monotherapy with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 agents achieves objective response rates (ORR) of around 30% and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates of 76%, anti-PD1, and anti-CTLA4 combinations achieve a 55% ORR and a 1-year OS rate of 85%. Several ongoing trials are evaluating the use of different immunotherapy combinations, both in the advanced and early settings and in MSI-h and MSS CRCs.

Receptor-Interacting Serine/Threonine-Protein Kinase-2 as a Potential Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer

Background and objectives: Receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase-2 (RIPK2) is an important mediator in different pathways in the immune and inflammatory response system. RIPK2 was also shown to play different roles in different cancer types; however, in colorectal cancer (CRC), its role is not well established. This study aims at identifying the role of RIPK2 in CRC progression and survival. Materials and methods: Data of patients and mRNA protein expression level of genes associated with CRC (RIPK2, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), TRAF1, TRAF7, KLF6, interlukin-6 (Il6), interlukin-8 (Il8), vascular-endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), MKI67, TP53, nuclear factor-kappa B (NFKB), NFKB2, BCL2, XIAP, and RELA) were downloaded from the PrognoScan online public database. Patients were divided between low and high RIPK2 expression and different CRC characteristics were studied between the two groups. Survival curves were evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier estimator. The Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation between RIPK2 and the other factors. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS version 25.0. The Human Protein Atlas was also used for the relationship between RIPK2 expression in CRC tissues and survival. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 520 patients were downloaded from the PrognoScan database, and RIPK2 was found to correlate with MKI67, TRAF1, KLF6, TNF, Il6, Il8, VEGFA, NFKB2, BCL2, and RELA. High expression of RIPK2 was associated with high expression of VEGFA (p < 0.01) and increased mortality (p < 0.01). Conclusions: In this study, RIPK2 is shown to be a potential prognostic factor in CRC; however, more studies are needed to assess and verify its potential role as a prognostic marker and in targeted therapy.

EGFR Protein Expression in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Another Negative Predictive Factor of the Cetuximab Therapy

The selection of colorectal cancer patients for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy is based on the determination of their RAS mutation status—a strongly negative predictive factor—since the protein target, EGFR, is not a reliable predictor of therapeutic response. In this study, we revisited the EGFR protein issue using a cohort of 90 patients with KRAS exon2 wild-type colorectal cancer who have been treated with cetuximab therapy. Twenty-nine of these patients had metastatic tissue available for analysis. The level of EGFR protein expression in the patients was determined by immunohistochemistry and evaluated by H-score (HS) methodology. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were determined according to the EGFR-HS ranges of both the primary and metastatic tissues using Kaplan–Meyer statistics. In the case of primary tumors, EGFR scores lower than HS = 200 were associated with significantly longer OS. In the case of metastatic tissues, all levels lower than the EGFR-HS range chosen were associated with significantly longer OS. These results are explained by the fact that metastatic tissues rarely maintained the expression levels of the primary tumors. On the other hand, high EGFR expression levels in either primary tumors or metastatic tissues were associated with multiple metastatic disease. This suggests a negative prognostic role of EGFR expression. However, in a multivariate analysis, one-sidedness remained a strong independent predictive factor of survival. Previous studies demonstrated that the EGFR expression level depends on sidedness. Therefore, a subgroup analysis of the left- and right-sided cases was performed on both primary and metastatic tissues. In the case of metastic tissues, an analysis confirmed a better OS in low EGFR protein-expressing cases than in high EGFR protein-expressing cases. Collectively, these data suggest that EGFR protein expression is another negative predictive factor of the efficacy of cetuximab therapy of KRAS exon2 wild-type colorectal cancer.

Is primary tumor location an independent prognostic factor in stage IV colon cancer?

Objectives: To determine whether primary tumor location is an independent prognostic factor in stage IV colon cancer, focusing on its relationship with chemotherapy and/or sex. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinicopathological data from 255 patients with stage IV colon cancer from two treatment eras according to the year of starting multidrug combination chemotherapy: period A was from 1985 to 2005 and period B from 2006 to 2013. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to assess overall survival(OS). Results: Right-sided colon cancer tended to be more common in elderly females with large-sized tumors, exhibiting mucinous histology or peritoneal dissemination. After propensity score matching, 130 patients were identified. There was no difference in OS between left-sided and right-sided tumors in either period A or B. The prognosis of patients receiving chemotherapy in either period was superior to that of those without chemotherapy. Better outcome of chemotherapy was seen only in female left-sided patients from both periods (p < 0.05). By multivariate analysis, liver metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, and chemotherapy were found to be independent risk factors in period A, whereas only liver metastasis and chemotherapy were the independent factors in period B. Conclusions: Primary tumor location is not an independent prognostic factor, but seems to be a chemotherapy effect modifier.

EGFR Protein Expression of KRAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: Predictive Value of the Sidedness for Efficacy of Anti-EGFR Therapy

Right- and left-sided colorectal cancers (RSCRC and LSCRC, respectively) are different developmentally, genetically and prognostically. Clinical data also indicate that they respond differently to anti-EGFR therapies. The role of EGFR protein expression in KRAS wild type colorectal cancer is also controversial. Here we have used a cohort of anti-EGFR antibody treated KRAS-wild type colorectal cancer patients (n = 97) to analyse the prognostic role of EGFR protein expression in relation to sidedness. In our cohort EGFR copy number, determined by FISH, was not associated with the level of EGFR protein, assessed by immunohistochemistry and measured by H-scoring. There was a significantly higher EGFR H-score detected in RSCRC as compared to LSCRC in primary tumors (p = 0.04). Furthermore, in a proportion of cases (n = 31) metastatic tissues were also available and their analysis also found a significantly higher EGFR H-score in metastases of RSCRC compared to LSCRC (p = 0.018). Kaplan Meyer survival analysis demonstrated that anti-EGFR antibody therapies were more effective in case of LSCRC compared to RSCRC. Although in case of progression-free survival data just indicated a trend (p = 0.065), in case of overall survival the difference was significant favouring LSCRC (p = 0.047). These data demonstrated for the first time that the EGFR protein expression is significantly higher in KRAS wild type RSLCL as compared to LSCRC. Meanwhile it is somewhat unexpected that the lower EGFR protein expression was found to be associated with better efficacy of anti-EGFR antibody therapies of colorectal cancer, the finding of which must be further validated.

Colorectal Cancer: Why Does Side Matter?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, and the search for clinical and molecular prognostic and predictive factors is thus necessary to better tailor each individual patient's management. Primary tumor location (PTL) seems to act as a master prognostic factor pooling different clinical, pathological, and molecular poor prognostic factors. In fact, right-sided (RS) CRC patients are more frequently female and elderly with microsatellite unstable, BRAF mutated, CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-high, poorly differentiated tumors, compared to left-sided (LS) CRC patients. PTL does not seem to clearly influence disease-free survival (DFS) in localised colon cancer even though the opposite prognostic value of RS tumors on DFS depending on RAS/BRAF mutational status has been recently suggested in these patients. In metastatic CRC (mCRC), the poor prognosis associated with RS tumors is confirmed in the most recent publications in the era of double and triple chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted agents. Concerning the predictive value of PTL, in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC in the first-line setting, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy combined with chemotherapy appears to be more effective than bevacizumab in LS CRC, while patients with RS CRC benefit less from anti-EGFR therapy, and intensive chemotherapy plus bevacizumab may be more appropriate but EGFR antibodies remain an option if objective response is needed. Due to the limitation of the current data (unplanned and retrospective analyses), these conclusions must be interpreted with caution. Clinical trials in RS CRC may be of interest to clarify what is the best treatment strategy in these patients.

An Update of Efficacy and Safety of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer, representing 13% of all diagnosed cancers. Cetuximab is a recombinant chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor. Cetuximab is approved for the first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent in patients who have failed or are intolerant to chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-expressing, RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Cetuximab efficacy emerged from studies that were conducted to approve the drug. Cetuximab is well tolerated; its toxicities are caused by its mechanism of action and the most common adverse reaction is skin toxicity. The main purpose of this manuscript is to present an update on the evidence-based summary of efficacy and safety and on the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab. Furthermore, it suggests a management of adverse drug reactions to improve the tolerability of the drug.

The influence of tumour site on prognosis in metastatic colorectal carcinomas with primary tumour resection

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare the characteristics and prognosis between right- and left-sided metastatic colorectal carcinomas.

METHODS

Data from 937 patients with stage IV colorectal carcinomas (synchronous distant metastasis) who had a resection of the primary tumour between 1985 and 2014 were analysed. Carcinomas in the caecum to transverse colon were defined as right-sided (n = 250; 26.7%). They were compared to tumours located from the splenic flexure to the rectum categorised as left-sided (n = 687; 73.3%).

RESULTS

In right-sided carcinomas, we observed significantly more female patients (50.8 vs 36.2%; p < 0.001), more unfavourable histological types (24.0 vs 8.6%; p < 0.001), more M1c carcinomas (metastases to the peritoneum ± others; 32.0 vs 14.4%; p < 0.001) and more emergencies (11.6 vs 7.1%; p = 0.029), while multimodal treatment was utilised in fewer patients (51.6 vs 63.8%; p = 0.001) and curative resections were less frequently (24.1 vs 35.4%; p = 0.002). Prognosis was significantly worse in patients with right-sided carcinomas (2-year-survival 27.2 vs 44.6%, p < 0.01). This difference was more pronounced after R2 resection (15.3 vs 29.7%; p < 0.001), than after macroscopic curative resection (2-year-survival 63.9 vs 71.9%; p = 0.106). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumour site was found to be an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.0-1.5; p = 0.012). During the three 10-year periods, the prognosis improved equally in patients with right- and left-sided carcinomas, while the differences in survival remained identical.

CONCLUSIONS

In a surgical patient cohort undergoing primary tumour resection, significant differences in prognosis were observed between patients with metastatic right- and left-sided colorectal carcinomas.

The effects of prophylactic cranial irradiation versus control on survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 14 trials

BACKGROUND

A recent Japanese study suggested prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) failed to improve survival of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, previous studies showed that PCI was beneficial in reducing the rate of mortality for extensive-stage SCLC. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PCI on the survival of patients diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC by meta-analysis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM) were systematically searched to identify eligible clinical studies assessing the efficacy of PCI in extensive-stage SCLC patients. After extracting survival data, brain metastasis, and response rates, the pooled estimates were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 14 clinical studies were included, involving 1221 cases in the PCI group and 5074 in the control group. The results showed that PCI significantly improved overall survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47, 0.69; p < 0.001) and brain metastasis (risk ratio (RR) =0.47, 95%CI: 0.33, 0.69; p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis along with sensitivity analysis suggested that PCI effects on overall survival were independent of region, pre-PCI brain metastasis status and PCI administration timing.

CONCLUSION

PCI improves overall survival in extensive-stage SCLC. More randomized controlled trials are needed to verify our findings.

A reliable and feasible way to predict the benefits of Nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis of 14 retrospective studies

Objective: Nivolumab has been used for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) worldwide. Whether neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) can predict the prognosis of NSCLC treated with Nivolumab is still under debate. This meta-analysis was to assess the significance of NLR as a predictive factor in NSCLC patients receiving Nivolumab. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched to identify eligible studies evaluating the role of NLR in predicting prognosis of NSCLC treated with Nivolumab until March 2018 without language restrictions. The meta-analysis was performed using hazard ratio (HR) of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients with various NLR. Results: A total of 14 retrospective studies consisting of 1225 NSCLC patients were included. The combined results showed that relatively higher baseline NLR was associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.18-1.77; p < 0.05) and OS (HR = 1.75; 95% CI: 1.33-2.30; p < 0.05) after treatment of Nivolumab. Subgroup analysis suggested that NLR ≥ 5 was more reliable for PFS (HR = 1.73; 95%CI: 1.14, 2.62; p < 0.05) and OS (HR = 1.76; 95%CI: 1.47, 2.10; p < 0.05). In addition, post-treatment NLR also had predictive roles for PFS (HR = 3.17; 95%CI: 1.48, 6.82; p < 0.05) and OS (HR = 2.26; 95%CI: 1.05, 4.86; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that NLR can be used as a prognostic biomarker for NSCLC treating with Nivolumab, and the recommended cutoff value of NLR is 5.

Investigation of tumor-tumor interactions in a double human cervical carcinoma xenograft model in nude mice

Tumor-tumor distant interactions within one organism are of major clinical relevance determining clinical outcome. To investigate this poorly understood phenomenon, a double human cervical xenograft model in nude mice was developed. A first tumor was induced subcutaneously by injection of human papillomavirus positive cervical carcinoma cells into the mouse lower right flank and 3 weeks later, animals were challenged with the same tumor cell line injected subcutaneously into the upper left flank. These tumors had no direct physical contact and we found no systemic changes induced by the primary tumor affecting the growth of a secondary tumor. However, ablation of the primary tumor by local treatment with cidofovir, a nucleotide analogue with known antiviral and antiproliferative properties, resulted not only in a local antitumor effect but also in a temporary far-reaching effect leading to retarded growth of the challenged tumor. Cidofovir far-reaching effects were linked to a reduced tumor-driven inflammation, to increased anti-tumor immune responses, and could not be enhanced by co-administration with immune stimulating adjuvants. Our findings point to the potential use of cidofovir in novel therapeutic strategies aiming to kill tumor cells as well as to influence the immune system to fight cancer.

Combinations of Bevacizumab and Erlotinib Show Activity in Colorectal Cancer Independent of RAS Status

Purpose: There is extensive cross-talk between VEGF- and EGFR-pathway signaling in colorectal cancer. However, combinations of VEGF- and EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies (mAb) show disappointing activity, in particular for patients with mutant RAS Previous results show that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) can be active in colorectal cancer models resistant to mAbs. This prompted us to examine whether the activity of bevacizumab can be increased by combination with erlotinib.Experimental Design: The antitumor activity of bevacizumab, erlotinib, and their combination was determined in colorectal cancer models with different RAS status and bevacizumab sensitivity. EGFR/VEGF pathway activation was characterized by immunohistochemistry, Western blot, and ELISA assays. The influence of cetuximab and erlotinib on EGF-mediated migration and the EGFR-EGF ligand feedback loop was established in colorectal cancer cell lines with different RAS status.Results: The addition of erlotinib increased bevacizumab activity in all models independent of RAS status. Bevacizumab exposure was accompanied by marked EGFR activation in tumor cells as well as in tumor-associated endothelial cells (TECs) and resulted in strong accumulation of intracellular EGFR, which could be attenuated by erlotinib. In cellular models, erlotinib was able to attenuate EGF-mediated functions in all cell lines independent of RAS status while cetuximab only showed activity in RAS wild-type cells.Conclusions: These results should provide a molecular framework to better understand the increased activity of the bevacizumab-erlotinib combination, compared with bevacizumab alone, in the GERCOR DREAM phase III clinical trial. Differential activity of mAbs and TKIs targeting the same signaling pathway is likely applicable for other tumor types. Clin Cancer Res; 24(11); 2548-58. ©2018 AACR.

Antitumor activity of EGFR-specific CAR T cells against non-small-cell lung cancer cells in vitro and in mice

Effective control of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains clinically challenging, especially during advanced stages of the disease. This study developed an adoptive T-cell treatment through expression of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) to target human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in NSCLC. We optimized the non-viral piggyBac transposon system to engineer human T cells for the expression of EGFR-CAR, consisting of EGFR scFv, transmembrane domain, and intracellular 4-1BB-CD3ζ signaling domains. The modified CAR T cells exhibited expansion capability and anticancer efficacy in a time- and antigen-dependent manner in vitro as well as regression of EGFR-positive human lung cancer xenografts in vivo. EGFR-CAR T therapy is a promising strategy to improve the efficacy and potency of the adoptive immunotherapy in NSCLC. Moreover, EGFR-CAR T therapy could become a clinical application for NSCLC patients in the future.