Regression of BRAFV600E mutant adult glioblastoma after primary combined BRAF-MEK inhibitor targeted therapy: a report of two cases

Efficacy of BRAF/MEK-inhibitor therapy for epithelioid glioblastoma with a novel BRAFV600 mutation

Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGB), a very aggressive and rare brain tumour, is associated with a dismal median overall survival. Effective therapies for patients with eGB, particularly with leptomeningeal dissemination, are still lacking. Here, we describe a case of a 25-year-old male diagnosed with an intramedullary cervical tumour with subsequent leptomeningeal disease. Histopathology identified a highly necrotising, epithelioid-type tumour with high cell density, most compatible with the diagnosis of an eGB. DNA analysis revealed an unprecedented B-Raf protooncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) gene variant in exon 15 (ENST00000288602.6, c.1799_1810delinsATG, p.(V600_W604delinsDG)), triggering activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Consequently, we initiated MAPK inhibitor (MAPKi) therapy, utilizing a combination of BRAF and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis confirmed the drugs' presence in the patient's cerebrospinal fluid, indicating their capacity to cross the blood-brain barrier. Remarkably, the patient responded very well to therapy and transitioned from a near-comatose state to significantly improved health, sustained for over three months. This study highlights that MAPKi, particularly targeted towards novel BRAFV600 mutations, might offer promising advancements in eGB treatment strategies.

The Significance of BRAF Mutation in the Epithelioid Glioblastoma Subtype: A Systematic Literature Review and a Case Report with a Unique Intraventricular Topography

Epithelioid glioblastoma (E-GBM) is an exceedingly rare subtype of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastoma, first included in the WHO 2016 classification and characterized by a dominant population of epithelioid cells. Its histological and molecular defining features remain troublesome. The significance of BRAF mutations to pathological diagnosis and surgical outcome has drawn increasing attention given their promising potential for future adjuvant therapies. Herein, we describe a unique case of an E-GBM in the atrium of the left lateral ventricle and comprehensively analyze the importance of BRAF status in a cohort of 211 E-GBMs from the literature. Our patient was a 40-year-old man with occipital pain. His brain MRI revealed a large intraventricular tumor at the same location as a signal change found 10 years earlier with no additional follow-up. He underwent gross total tumor removal followed by conventional adjuvant treatment. Histopathological diagnosis was consistent with IDH-wildtype E-GBM WHO grade 4 with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma-like areas. BRAF p.V600 mutation was demonstrated in the tumoral genetic study. In the cohort analyzed, male patients predominated (63%), the median age was 32 years old, and the 5-year survival rate following diagnosis was 4.2%. BRAF mutations were found in 60.3% of the tumors overall, with this rate increasing to 78.3% in young adults (19-49 years, P < .001). Presence of BRAF mutations associated with tumor progression (P = .001), the event usually leading to death (P < .001). In conclusion, our study supports the importance of genetic BRAF p.V600 mutation analysis because its presence not only points to an E-GBM diagnosis but may also promote tumor progression.

Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future

Glioblastoma (GB) stands out as the most prevalent and lethal form of brain cancer. Although great efforts have been made by clinicians and researchers, no significant improvement in survival has been achieved since the Stupp protocol became the standard of care (SOC) in 2005. Despite multimodality treatments, recurrence is almost universal with survival rates under 2 years after diagnosis. Here, we discuss the recent progress in our understanding of GB pathophysiology, in particular, the importance of glioma stem cells (GSCs), the tumor microenvironment conditions, and epigenetic mechanisms involved in GB growth, aggressiveness and recurrence. The discussion on therapeutic strategies first covers the SOC treatment and targeted therapies that have been shown to interfere with different signaling pathways (pRB/CDK4/RB1/P16ink4, TP53/MDM2/P14arf, PI3k/Akt-PTEN, RAS/RAF/MEK, PARP) involved in GB tumorigenesis, pathophysiology, and treatment resistance acquisition. Below, we analyze several immunotherapeutic approaches (i.e., checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, CAR-modified NK or T cells, oncolytic virotherapy) that have been used in an attempt to enhance the immune response against GB, and thereby avoid recidivism or increase survival of GB patients. Finally, we present treatment attempts made using nanotherapies (nanometric structures having active anti-GB agents such as antibodies, chemotherapeutic/anti-angiogenic drugs or sensitizers, radionuclides, and molecules that target GB cellular receptors or open the blood-brain barrier) and non-ionizing energies (laser interstitial thermal therapy, high/low intensity focused ultrasounds, photodynamic/sonodynamic therapies and electroporation). The aim of this review is to discuss the advances and limitations of the current therapies and to present novel approaches that are under development or following clinical trials.

Case report: BRAF-inhibitor therapy in BRAF-mutated primary CNS tumours including one case of BRAF-mutated Rosai-Dorfman disease

BRAF V600E oncogene mutations have been reported in multiple central nervous system (CNS) tumor types, and emerging evidence supports the use of targeted therapy in BRAF-mutated gliomas. BRAF oncogene mutations have been recently identified in Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD)-a rare non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. This series describes three patients from two neurosurgical centers in Ireland with BRAF V600E-mutated CNS tumors. The study participants include a 19-year-old male patient with ganglioglioma with anaplastic features, a 21-year-old male patient with CNS involvement of RDD, and a 28-year-old female patient with ganglioglioma with anaplastic features. Two patients received radiation with concurrent temozolomide before BRAF-targeted therapy. This case series describes clinical and radiological responses to BRAF-targeted therapy in BRAF V600E-mutated gliomas across multiple tumor grades and is only the second published report of response to targeted therapy in BRAF-mutated RDD. The durability of disease control with BRAF-targeted therapy was generally superior to that achieved with chemoradiation; one patient has experienced ongoing disease control for 5 years. The reported case of treatment response in BRAF-mutated RDD supports the strategy of genotyping and utilization of targeted therapy in this rare disease. The optimal sequencing of BRAF-targeted therapy in BRAF-mutated gliomas/glioneuronal tumors remains unclear, and further prospective studies are required to guide the use of genome-matched therapy in this patient population.

Upfront BRAF/MEK inhibitors for treatment of high-grade glioma: A case report and review of the literature

Background

High-grade gliomas (HGG) with BRAFV600E mutation represent a unique subset of central nervous system tumors. Targeted therapies including BRAF and MEK inhibitors are now being explored as possible new treatment options.

Methods

We report an 18-year-old female with a grade 3 pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma treated upfront with dabrafenib and trametinib. We also conducted a systematic literature review of patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors.

Results

Despite local recurrences resected surgically, the patient has been on dabrafenib and trametinib for more than 54 months. Thirty-two patients with HGG and BRAFV600E mutations treated with BRAF inhibitors were retrieved through our systematic review of the literature. Only 1 young patient with an anaplastic ganglioglioma was treated upfront with a BRAF inhibitor with a curative intent. Best response reported with radiation therapy and systemic therapy was a stable disease (SD) for 18 patients (56.3%) and progressive disease (PD) for 9 patients (28.1%). Responses to treatment regimens that included BRAF inhibitors were reported in 31 patients and included 4 complete responses (12.9%), 23 partial responses (74.2%), 2 SDs (6.5%), and 2 PDs (6.5%).

Conclusions

Our patient had durable disease control with dabrafenib and trametinib. Given favorable responses reported in patients with HGG treated with BRAF inhibitors, we believe that upfront targeted therapy is a possible treatment approach that should be studied in the context of a clinical trial.

New Directions in the Therapy of Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most common histologic type of all gliomas and contributes to 57.3% of all cases. Despite the standard management based on surgical resection and radiotherapy, it is related to poor outcome, with a 5-year relative survival rate below 6.9%. In order to improve the overall outcome for patients, the new therapeutic strategies are needed. Herein, we describe the current state of knowledge on novel targeted therapies in glioblastoma. Based on recent studies, we compared treatment efficacy measured by overall survival and progression-free survival in patients treated with selected potential antitumor drugs. The results of the application of the analyzed inhibitors are highly variable despite the encouraging conclusions of previous preclinical studies. This paper focused on drugs that target major glioblastoma kinases. As far, the results of some BRAF inhibitors are favorable. Vemurafenib demonstrated a long-term efficacy in clinical trials while the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib improves PFS compared with both vemurafenib and dabrafenib alone. There is no evidence that any MEK inhibitor is effective in monotherapy. According to the current state of knowledge, BRAF and MEK inhibition are more advantageous than BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Moreover, mTOR inhibitors (especially paxalisib) may be considered a particularly important group. Everolimus demonstrated a partial response in a significant proportion of patients when combined with bevacizumab, however its actual role in the treatment is unclear. Neither nintedanib nor pemigatinib were efficient in treatment of GBM. Among the anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab monotherapy was a well-tolerated option, significantly associated with anti-GBM activity in patients with recurrent GBM. The efficacy of aflibercept and pazopanib in monotherapy has not been demonstrated. Apatinib has been proven to be effective and tolerable by a single clinical trial, but more research is needed. Lenvatinib is under trial. Finally, promising results from a study with regorafenib may be confirmed by the ongoing randomized AGILE trial. The studies conducted so far have provided a relatively wide range of drugs, which are at least well tolerated and demonstrated some efficacy in the randomized clinical trials. The comprehensive understanding of the molecular biology of gliomas promises to further improve the treatment outcomes of patients.

Major Features of the 2021 WHO Classification of CNS Tumors

Advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of central nervous system (CNS) tumors prompted a new World Health Organization (WHO) classification scheme in 2021, only 5 years after the prior iteration. The 2016 version was the first to include specific molecular alterations in the diagnoses of a few tumors, but the 2021 system greatly expanded this approach, with over 40 tumor types and subtypes now being defined by their key molecular features. Many tumors have also been reconceptualized into new "supercategories," including adult-type diffuse gliomas, pediatric-type diffuse low- and high-grade gliomas, and circumscribed astrocytic gliomas. Some entirely new tumors are in this scheme, particularly pediatric tumors. Naturally, these changes will impact how CNS tumor patients are diagnosed and treated, including clinical trial enrollment. This review addresses the most clinically relevant changes in the 2021 WHO book, including diffuse and circumscribed gliomas, ependymomas, embryonal tumors, and meningiomas.

Looking Beyond the Glioblastoma Mask: Is Genomics the Right Path?

Glioblastomas are the most frequent and malignant brain tumor hallmarked by an invariably poor prognosis. They have been classically differentiated into primary isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1 -2) wild-type (wt) glioblastoma (GBM) and secondary IDH mutant GBM, with IDH wt GBMs being commonly associated with older age and poor prognosis. Recently, genetic analyses have been integrated with epigenetic investigations, strongly implementing typing and subtyping of brain tumors, including GBMs, and leading to the new WHO 2021 classification. GBM genomic and epigenomic profile influences evolution, resistance, and therapeutic responses. However, differently from other tumors, there is a wide gap between the refined GBM profiling and the limited therapeutic opportunities. In addition, the different oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes involved in glial cell transformation, the heterogeneous nature of cancer, and the restricted access of drugs due to the blood–brain barrier have limited clinical advancements. This review will summarize the more relevant genetic alterations found in GBMs and highlight their potential role as potential therapeutic targets.

Leptomeningeal Spread at the Diagnosis of Glioblastoma Multiforme: A Case Report and Literature Review

Approximately two-thirds of glioblastoma (GBM) patients progress to leptomeningeal spread (LMS) within two years. While 90% of LMS cases are diagnosed during the progression and/or recurrence of GBM (defined as secondary LMS), LMS presentation at the time of GBM diagnosis (defined as primary LMS) is very rare. ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxy glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) study helps to diagnose the multifocal spread of the malignant primary brain tumor. Our patient was a 31-year-old man with a tumorous lesion located in the right temporal lobe, a wide area of the leptomeninges, and spinal cord (thoracic 5/6, and lumbar 1 level) involvement as a concurrent manifestation. After the removal of the right temporal tumor, the clinical status progressed rapidly, showing signs of increased intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus caused by LMS. He underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt a week after craniotomy. During management, progression of cord compression, paraplegia, bone marrow suppression related to radiochemotherapy, intercurrent infections, and persistent ascites due to peritoneal metastasis of the LMS through the shunt system was observed. The patient finally succumbed to the disease nine months after the diagnosis of simultaneous GBM and LMS. The overall survival of primary LMS with GBM in our case was nine months, which is shorter than that of secondary LMS with GBM. The survival period after the diagnosis of LMS did not seem to be significantly different between primary and secondary LMS. To determine the prognostic effect and difference between primary and secondary LMS, further cooperative studies with large-volume data analysis are warranted.

Signaling pathways and therapeutic approaches in glioblastoma multiforme (Review)

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive type of primary brain tumor and is associated with a poor clinical prognosis. Despite the progress in the understanding of the molecular and genetic changes that promote tumorigenesis, effective treatment options are limited. The present review intended to identify and summarize major signaling pathways and genetic abnormalities involved in the pathogenesis of GBM, as well as therapies that target these pathways. Glioblastoma remains a difficult to treat tumor; however, in the last two decades, significant improvements in the understanding of GBM biology have enabled advances in available therapeutics. Significant genomic events and signaling pathway disruptions (NF‑κB, Wnt, PI3K/AKT/mTOR) involved in the formation of GBM were discussed. Current therapeutic options may only marginally prolong survival and the current standard of therapy cures only a small fraction of patients. As a result, there is an unmet requirement for further study into the processes of glioblastoma pathogenesis and the discovery of novel therapeutic targets in novel signaling pathways implicated in the evolution of glioblastoma.

Clinical and radiological findings of glioblastomas harboring a BRAF V600E mutation

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological characteristics of glioblastomas (GBMs) harboring a BRAF mutation. Sequencing analysis of BRAF, IDH1/2, and TERT promoters was performed on GBM samples of patients older than 15 years. The clinical, pathological, and radiological data of patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into three groups according to their BRAF and IDH1/2 status: BRAF group, IDH group, and BRAF/IDH-wild-type (WT) group. Among 179 GBM cases, we identified nine cases with a BRAF mutation and nine with IDH mutation. The WT group had 161 cases. Age at onset in the BRAF group was significantly lower compared to the WT group and was similar to the IDH group. In cases with negative IDH1-R132H staining and age < 55 years, 15.2% were BRAF-mutant cases. Similar to the IDH group, overall survival of the BRAF group was significantly longer compared with the WT group. Among nine cases in the BRAF group, three cases had hemorrhagic onset and prior lesions were observed in two cases. In conclusion, age < 55 years, being IDH1-R132H negative, with hemorrhagic onset or the presence of prior lesions are factors that signal recommendation of BRAF analysis for adult GBM patients.

HSP90 inhibition overcomes resistance to molecular targeted therapy in BRAFV600E mutant high-grade glioma

PURPOSE

Molecular targeted therapy using BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors has been applied to BRAFV600E mutant high-grade gliomas (HGGs); however, the therapeutic effect is limited by the emergence of drug resistance.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We established multiple paired BRAFV600E mutant HGG patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models based on tissues collected prior to and at relapse after molecular targeted therapy. Using these models, we dissected treatment resistant mechanisms for molecular targeted therapy and explored therapeutic targets to overcome resistance in BRAFV600E HGG models in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

We found that, despite causing no major genetic and epigenetic changes, BRAF and/or MEK inhibitor treatment deregulated multiple negative feedback mechanisms, which led to the re-activation of the MAPK pathway through c-Raf and AKT signaling. This altered oncogenic signaling primarily mediated resistance to molecular targeted therapy in BRAFV600E mutant HGG. To overcome this resistance mechanism, we performed a high-throughput drug screening to identify therapeutic agents that potently induce additive cytotoxicity with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. We discovered that HSP90 inhibition combined with BRAF/MEK inhibition coordinately deactivated the MAPK and AKT/mTOR pathways, and subsequently induced apoptosis via dephosphorylation of GSK3β (Ser9) and inhibition of Bcl-2 family proteins. This mediated potent cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo in refractory models with acquired resistance to molecular-targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of an HSP90 inhibitor with BRAF or MEK inhibitors can overcome the limitations of the current therapeutic strategies for BRAFV600E mutant HGG.

Utilisation of semiconductor sequencing for the detection of predictive biomarkers in glioblastoma

The standard treatment for glioblastoma involves a combination of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy but have limited impact on survival. The exponential increase in targeted agents directed at pivotal oncogenic pathways now provide new therapeutic opportunities for this tumour type. However, lack of comprehensive precision oncology testing at diagnosis means such therapeutic opportunities are potentially overlooked. To investigate the role of semiconductor sequencing for detection of predictive biomarkers in routine glioblastoma samples we have undertaken analysis of test trending data generated by a clinically validated next generation sequencing platform designed to capture actionable genomic variants distributed across 505 genes. Analysis was performed across a cohort of 55 glioblastoma patients. Analysis of trending data has revealed a complex and rich actionable mutational landscape in which 166 actionable mutations were detected across 36 genes linked to 17 off label targeted therapy protocols and 111 clinical trials. The majority of patients harboured three or more actionable mutations affecting key cancer related regulatory networks including the PI3K/AKT/MTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/MAPK signalling pathways, DNA-damage repair pathways and cell cycle checkpoints. Linkage with immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors was identified in 44% of glioblastoma patients as a consequence of alterations in DNA-damage repair genes. Taken together our data indicates that precision oncology testing utilising semiconductor sequencing can be used to identify a broad therapeutic armamentarium of targeted therapies and immunotherapies that can be potentially employed for the improved clinical management of glioblastoma patients.

Abnormal Schwannoma-like Growth of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive Glioblastoma in the Interior Acoustic Canal with Leptomeningeal Infiltration: a case report

Background

Glioblastoma belongs to the most common and most aggressive tumor entity of the central nervous system with a poor prognosis of only few months. Once manifested, it grows fast and diffusely by infiltrating the surrounding brain parenchyma. Despite its aggressive behavior, glioblastoma rarely presents with multiple lesions and metastasis to intra- and extracranial tissues. Therefore, metastasized, multiple glioblastoma is limited to case reports. Our case describes an atypical primary bilateral manifestation of BRAF V600E-positive epithelioid glioblastoma with rapid metastasis and meningeosis glioblastoma while under adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old Caucasian male patient presented with a seizure and numbness in his left arm. He was diagnosed with an abnormal primary bilateral manifestation of multiple, multifocal BRAF V600E-positive and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type intracranial epithelioid glioblastoma with O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation (MGMT) at 12%. While being under the adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, the patient developed left-sided facial nerve weakness and hearing loss, dysarthria, and severe gait instability. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging showed that glioblastoma lesions advanced rapidly with a schwannoma-like growth pattern by invading the left internal acoustic meatus, adjacent cranial nerves, and leptomeninges. A lumbar puncture confirmed meningeosis glioblastoma. Four months after the initial diagnosis of glioblastoma, the patient died from the complications of the fast and diffuse metastasis.

Conclusions

Glioblastoma rarely presents with metastases despite its aggressive and rapidly growing nature. Our case should increase awareness of symptom tracking in patients with glioblastoma to intervene early and efficiently. Moreover, refractory therapies for glioblastoma should underline the importance of personalized medicine.

BRAF mutations may identify a clinically distinct subset of glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Prior studies examining the mutational landscape of GBM revealed recurrent alterations in genes that regulate the same growth control pathways. To this regard, ~ 40% of GBM harbor EGFR alterations, whereas BRAF variants are rare. Existing data suggests that gain-of-function mutations in these genes are mutually exclusive. This study was designed to explore the clinical, pathological, and molecular differences between EGFR- and BRAF-mutated GBM. We reviewed retrospective clinical data from 89 GBM patients referred for molecular testing between November 2012 and December 2015. Differences in tumor mutational profile, location, histology, and survival outcomes were compared in patients with EGFR- versus BRAF-mutated tumors, and microarray data from The Cancer Genome Atlas was used to assess differential gene expression between the groups. Individuals with BRAF-mutant tumors were typically younger and survived longer relative to those with EGFR-mutant tumors, even in the absence of targeted treatments. BRAF-mutant tumors lacked distinct histomorphology but exhibited unique localization in the brain, typically arising adjacent to the lateral ventricles. Compared to EGFR- and IDH1-mutant tumors, BRAF-mutant tumors showed increased expression of genes related to a trophoblast-like phenotype, specifically HLA-G and pregnancy specific glycoproteins, that have been implicated in invasion and immune evasion. Taken together, these observations suggest a distinct clinical presentation, brain location, and gene expression profile for BRAF-mutant tumors. Pending further study, this may prove useful in the stratification and management of GBM.

Genomic landscape of gliosarcoma: distinguishing features and targetable alterations

Gliosarcoma is an aggressive brain tumor with histologic features of glioblastoma (GBM) and soft tissue sarcoma. Despite its poor prognosis, its rarity has precluded analysis of its underlying biology. We used a multi-center database to characterize the genomic landscape of gliosarcoma. Sequencing data was obtained from 35 gliosarcoma patients from Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) 5.0, a database curated by the American Association of Cancer Research (AACR). We analyzed genomic alterations in gliosarcomas and compared them to GBM (n = 1,449) and soft tissue sarcoma (n = 1,042). 30 samples were included (37% female, median age 59 [IQR: 49–64]). Nineteen common genes were identified in gliosarcoma, defined as those altered in > 5% of samples, including TERT Promoter (92%), PTEN (66%), and TP53 (60%). Of the 19 common genes in gliosarcoma, 6 were also common in both GBM and soft tissue sarcoma, 4 in GBM alone, 0 in soft tissue sarcoma alone, and 9 were more distinct to gliosarcoma. Of these, BRAF harbored an OncoKB level 1 designation, indicating its status as a predictive biomarker of response to an FDA-approved drug in certain cancers. EGFR, CDKN2A, NF1, and PTEN harbored level 4 designations in solid tumors, indicating biological evidence of these biomarkers predicting a drug-response. Gliosarcoma contains molecular features that overlap GBM and soft tissue sarcoma, as well as its own distinct genomic signatures. This may play a role in disease classification and inclusion criteria for clinical trials. Gliosarcoma mutations with potential therapeutic indications include BRAF, EGFR, CDKN2A, NF1, and PTEN.

Predicting BRAF V600E mutation in glioblastoma: utility of radiographic features

Detection of BRAF V600E mutation in glioblastomas (GBMs) is important because of potential therapeutic implications. Still, the relative paucity of these mutations makes molecular detection in all GBMs controversial. In the present study, we analyzed clinical, radiographic and pathologic features of 12 BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs and 12 matched controls from 2 institutions. We found that a majority of BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs displayed a combination of well-circumscribed lesions, large cystic components with thin walls and solid cortical component on MRI, but with some overlap with matched BRAF wildtype controls (p = 0.069). BRAF V600E-mutant GBMs were also apt to gross total resection (83% vs 17%, p = 0.016) and morphologically displayed epithelioid features (83% vs 0%, p < 0.0001). Identification of these clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics should prompt testing for BRAF V600E in IDH-wildtype GBM.

Glioblastoma multiforme: a multi-omics analysis of driver genes and tumour heterogeneity

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and common brain cancer in adults with the lowest life expectancy. The current neuro-oncology practice has incorporated genes involved in key molecular events that drive GBM tumorigenesis as biomarkers to guide diagnosis and design treatment. This study summarizes findings describing the significant heterogeneity of GBM at the transcriptional and genomic levels, emphasizing 18 driver genes with clinical relevance. A pattern was identified fitting the stem cell model for GBM ontogenesis, with an upregulation profile for MGMT and downregulation for ATRX, H3F3A, TP53 and EGFR in the mesenchymal subtype. We also detected overexpression of EGFR, NES, VIM and TP53 in the classical subtype and of MKi67 and OLIG2 genes in the proneural subtype. Furthermore, we found a combination of the four biomarkers EGFR, NES, OLIG2 and VIM with a remarkable differential expression pattern which confers them a strong potential to determine the GBM molecular subtype. A unique distribution of somatic mutations was found for the young and adult population, particularly for genes related to DNA repair and chromatin remodelling, highlighting ATRX, MGMT and IDH1. Our results also revealed that highly lesioned genes undergo differential regulation with particular biological pathways for young patients. This multi-omic analysis will help delineate future strategies related to the use of these molecular markers for clinical decision-making in the medical routine.

Clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of epithelioid glioblastoma

Epithelioid glioblastoma is a new variant of glioblastoma that has been recently recognized in the 2016 WHO classification of brain tumors. Given the rarity of epithelioid glioblastoma, the clinical characteristics, pathological features, radiological findings, and treatment outcomes are still not well characterized. Therefore, we identified eighty-four epithelioid glioblastoma cases to investigate these characteristics and identify the possible prognostic factors of survival. There were 55 male and 29 female patients with a mean age of 33.6 years. Headache (77.3%) was the most common clinical symptom, and other common symptoms included nausea or vomiting (34%), dizziness (20.5%), seizures (13.6%), and limb weakness (13.6%). Most lesions (88.1%) were located in cerebral lobes, especially in the frontal lobe and temporal lobe. One hundred percent of the patients were IDH1 wild-type (75/75) and INI-1 positive (58/58), and 57.3% (47/82) of patients harbored BRAF^V600E mutation. The median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 10.5 months. Patients who received chemotherapy (p = 0.006) or radiotherapy (p = 0.022) had a longer survival than patients who did not. In addition, the K-M curve showed that the BRAF^V600E mutation status was not associated with survival (p = 0.724). These findings may assist clinicians with better understanding and management of epithelioid glioblastoma.

Response to BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibition in a young adult with BRAF V600E mutant epithelioid glioblastoma multiforme: A Case Report and Literature Review

Epithelioid glioblastoma multiforme (eGBM) is a rare and aggressive variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) that predominantly affects younger patients and can be difficult to distinguish from other gliomas. Data on how patients with eGBM might be best treated are limited, although genomic analyses have shown that almost half of tumours harbour activating BRAF gene mutations. Here we present the case of a young female with BRAF V600E-mutant eGBM who had a prolonged response to targeted therapy with the BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors dabrafenib and trametinib. We review current knowledge about eGBM, including the emerging role for BRAF- ± MEK1/2- targeted therapy.

Durable Progression-Free Survival With the Use of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Four Cases With BRAF V600E-Mutated Gliomas

INTRODUCTION

BRAF V600 E mutations have been identified in a subset of patients with primary brain tumors. Combination therapy with BRAF and Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) targeting sequential steps in the MAPK pathway has replaced BRAFi monotherapy as the standard of care in multiple tumors with BRAF V600 E mutations, and clinical evidence for this strategy continues to grow in primary brain tumors.

CASE SERIES

We describe four patients with BRAF V600 E mutated gliomas, including a 21-year-old woman with a ganglioglioma WHO grade I, a 19-year-old man with a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma WHO grade III, and 21-year-old and 33-year-old women with epithelioid GBM WHO grade IV, who achieved durable progression-free survival with combination BRAF/MEKi.

CONCLUSION

Combination of BRAF/MEK inhibition can be a novel, promising approach as targeted therapy in gliomas with BRAF V600 E mutations, especially those that are resistant to standard therapy. Our cases, along with other early reports utilizing dabrafenib/trametinib, highlight the importance of somatic next-generation sequencing, particularly in younger patients. Interim results from clinical trials utilizing dabrafenib/trametinib have been promising thus far, and our case series suggests that durable clinical benefit is possible, even in the setting of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV.

Analysis of 24 cases of epithelioid glioblastoma: Experience from a tertiary centre of North India

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGB) is a recently recognized and a rare variant of glioblastoma. This study aimed to describe the clinical, histological and immunohistochemical spectrum and outcome of eGB from a tertiary care hospital in north India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty four cases of eGB diagnosed over past 10 years were reviewed with detailed morphological and immunohistochemical analysis (GFAP, EMA, Vimentin, Myogenin, INI-1, Cytokeratin, Synaptophysin, CD99, S100, MelanA, IDH1, ATRX, p16, EZH2, Ki-67, and BRAF V600E mutant antibody).

RESULT

The mean age was 29.9 years (3-54 years), with equal male and female patients. All had supratentorial tumor. All cases showed epithelioid cells in sheets; however, focal spindling (7 cases, 29.2%), grouping/nesting (6 cases, 25%) and papillary configuration (5 cases, 20.8%) were also noted. All showed microvascular proliferation (MVP) and all except one demonstrated areas of necrosis. INI1 was retained in all cases, while 2 showed patchy loss. EZH2 overexpression (>25%) was observed in 4 cases, while 5 cases showed loss of p16 expression. BRAF V600E mutant protein expression was seen in 12/23 (52.2%) cases. Outcome was available in 8 cases, out of which 6 (75%) experienced recurrence. The median survival was 25.5 months. Cases with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes had a better outcome.

CONCLUSION

eGB is a distinct variant of glioblastoma which has predilection towards younger age group. It shows high percentage of BRAF V600E mutation and a subset of it shows longer survival. Cases with presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with better outcome.

Leptomeningeal Spread in Glioblastoma: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumor. Leptomeningeal spread (LMS) is a severe complication of GBM, raising diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in clinical routine.

METHODS

We performed a review of the literature focused on LMS in GBM. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were queried from 1989 to 2019 for articles describing diagnosis and therapeutic options in GBM LMS, as well as risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms.

RESULTS

We retrieved 155 articles, including retrospective series, case reports, and early phase clinical trials, as well as preclinical studies. These articles confirmed that LMS in GBM remains (a) a diagnostic challenge with cytological proof of LMS obtained in only 35% of cases and (b) a therapeutic challenge with a median overall survival below 2 months with best supportive care alone. For patients faced with suggestive clinical symptoms, whole neuroaxis magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid analysis are both recommended. Liquid biopsies are under investigation and may help prompt a reliable diagnosis. Based on the literature, a multimodal and personalized therapeutic approach of LMS, including surgery, radiotherapy, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, and intrathecal chemotherapies, may provide benefits to selected patients. Interestingly, molecular targeted therapies appear promising in case of actionable molecular target and should be considered.

CONCLUSION

As the prognosis of glioblastoma is improving over time, LMS becomes a more common complication. Our review highlights the need for translational studies and clinical trials dedicated to this challenging condition in order to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This review summarizes the diagnostic tools and applied treatments for leptomeningeal spread, a complication of glioblastoma, as well as their outcomes. The importance of exhaustive molecular testing for molecular targeted therapies is discussed. New diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are outlined, and the need for translational studies and clinical trials dedicated to this challenging condition is highlighted.

Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors to Overcome Resistance to Targeted and Immuno Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma

Therapies that target oncogenes and immune checkpoint molecules constitute a major group of treatments for metastatic melanoma. A mutation in BRAF (BRAF V600E) affects various signaling pathways, including mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in melanoma. Target-specific agents, such as MAPK inhibitors improve progression-free survival. However, BRAF^V600E mutant melanomas treated with BRAF kinase inhibitors develop resistance. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1(PD-L1), induce immune evasion of cancer cells. MAPK inhibitor resistance results from the increased expression of PD-L1. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-L1 or anti-PD-1, are main players in immune therapies designed to target metastatic melanoma. However, melanoma patients show low response rate and resistance to these inhibitors develops within 6–8 months of treatment. Epigenetic reprogramming, such as DNA methylaion and histone modification, regulates the expression of genes involved in cellular proliferation, immune checkpoints and the response to anti-cancer drugs. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) remove acetyl groups from histone and non-histone proteins and act as transcriptional repressors. HDACs are often dysregulated in melanomas, and regulate MAPK signaling, cancer progression, and responses to various anti-cancer drugs. HDACs have been shown to regulate the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 and genes involved in immune evasion. These reports make HDACs ideal targets for the development of anti-melanoma therapeutics. We review the mechanisms of resistance to anti-melanoma therapies, including MAPK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. We address the effects of HDAC inhibitors on the response to MAPK inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma. In addition, we discuss current progress in anti-melanoma therapies involving a combination of HDAC inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and MAPK inhibitors.

Epithelioid glioblastoma presenting as multicentric glioma: A case report and review of the literature

Background:

Epithelioid glioblastoma is a rare aggressive variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which was formally recognized by the World Health Organization classification of the central nervous system in 2016. Clinically, epithelioid GBMs are characterized by aggressive features, such as metastases and cerebrospinal fluid dissemination, and an extremely poor prognosis. A rare case of epithelioid GBM that was discovered as a multicentric glioma with different histopathology is reported.

Case Description:

A 78-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with mild motor weakness of the right leg. Neuroimaging showed small masses in the left frontal and parietal lobes on magnetic resonance imaging. The abnormal lesion had been increasing rapidly for 3 weeks, and a new lesion appeared in the frontal lobe. 11C-methionine positron emission tomography (PET) showed abnormal uptake corresponding to the lesion. To reach a definitive diagnosis, surgical excision of the right frontal mass lesion was performed. Histological findings showed diffuse astrocytoma. Only radiotherapy was planned, but the left frontal and parietal tumors progressed further within a short period. Therefore, it was thought that these tumors were GBM, and a biopsy of the left parietal tumor was performed. The histological diagnosis was epithelioid GBM. Immunohistochemistry showed that most tumor cells were negatively stained for p53 and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1. BRAF V600E mutations were not identified, but TERT promoter mutations were identified. Immediately after surgery, the patient was given chemotherapy using temozolomide, extended local radiotherapy and then bevacizumab. After 6 months, he showed no signs of recurrence.

Conclusion:

Epithelioid GBM is one of the rarest morphologic subtypes of GBM and has a strongly infiltrative and aggressive nature. Therefore, careful identification of preoperative imaging studies and detailed evaluation of genetic studies are necessary to select the appropriate treatment for epithelioid GBM.

Confirming Diagnosis and Effective Treatment for Rare Epithelioid Glioblastoma Variant: An Integrated Survival Analysis of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Epithelioid glioblastoma (eGBM) is a very rare histologic variant of glioblastoma that has not been studied in isolation and, therefore, its optimal management has been largely assumed, but not confirmed. The aim of this study was to analyze all reported cases describing the presentation and clinical features to better understand the clinical significance of this histologic diagnosis.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from 2005 to April 2019 identifying cases of eGBM that satisfied selection criteria for analysis. Survival was investigated using Kaplan-Meier estimations, and then univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for primary end point overall survival (OS) and second end point progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total cohort of 59 eGBM cases from 28 articles were included for final analysis. Median age of patients at diagnosis was 30 years, with 29 (46%) female patients. When reported, 100% (37/37) cases were IDH1-wild-type and 63% (19/30) were positive for the BRAF V600E mutation by immunohistochemistry. Median OS and PFS were estimated to be 11.0 months (95% confidence interval, 6.5-13.0) and 7.0 months (95% confidence interval, 3.0-10.0), respectively. Surgical extent of resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy all predicted superior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). No biomarkers prognosticated survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the histologic diagnosis of eGBM does not deviate from the clinical course of the broader glioblastoma diagnosis, despite being a unique histologic identity. These results argue against the temptation to deviate from the traditional management paradigm of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy for glioblastoma based on this histology alone.

Dramatic response of BRAF V600E-mutant epithelioid glioblastoma to combination therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitor: establishment and xenograft of a cell line to predict clinical efficacy

Epithelioid glioblastoma is a rare aggressive variant of glioblastoma (GBM) characterized by a dismal prognosis of about 6 months and frequent leptomeningeal dissemination. A recent study has revealed that 50% of epithelioid GBMs harbor three genetic alterations - BRAF V600E mutation, TERT promoter mutations, and homozygous deletions of CDKN2A/2B. Emerging evidence support the effectiveness of targeted therapies for brain tumors with BRAF V600E mutation. Here we describe a dramatic radiographical response to combined therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in a patient with epithelioid GBM harboring BRAF V600E mutation, characterized by thick spinal dissemination. From relapsed tumor procured at autopsy, we established a cell line retaining the BRAF V600E mutation, TERT promoter mutation and CDKN2A/2B loss. Intracranial implantation of these cells into mice resulted in tumors closely resembling the original, characterized by epithelioid tumor cells and dissemination, and invasion into the perivascular spaces. We then confirmed the efficacy of treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitor both in vitro and in vivo. Epithelioid GBM with BRAF V600E mutation can be considered a good treatment indication for precision medicine, and this patient-derived cell line should be useful for prediction of the tumor response and clarification of its biological characteristics.