Next-generation sequencing for sensitive detection of BCR-ABL1 mutations relevant to tyrosine kinase inhibitor choice in imatinib-resistant patients

Prediction of Response to FDA-Approved Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

OPINION STATEMENT

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents the predominant cancer in pediatric populations, though its occurrence in adults is relatively rare. Pre-treatment risk stratification is crucial for predicting prognosis. Important factors for assessment include patient age, white blood cell (WBC) count at diagnosis, extramedullary involvement, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic aberrations. Minimal residual disease (MRD), primarily assessed by flow cytometry following remission, plays a substantial role in guiding management plans. Over the past decade, significant advancements in ALL outcomes have been witnessed. Conventional chemotherapy has remarkably reduced mortality rates; however, its intensive nature raises safety concerns and has led to the emergence of treatment-resistant cases with recurrence of relapses. Consequently, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several novel treatments for relapsed/refractory ALL due to their demonstrated efficacy, as indicated by improved complete remission and survival rates. These treatments include tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody blinatumomab, anti-CD22 inotuzumab ozogamicin, anti-CD20 rituximab, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Identifying the variables that influence treatment decisions is a pressing necessity for tailoring therapy based on heterogeneous patient characteristics. Key predictive factors identified in various observational studies and clinical trials include prelymphodepletion disease burden, complex genetic abnormalities, and MRD. Furthermore, the development of serious adverse events following treatment could be anticipated through predictive models, allowing for appropriate prophylactic measures to be considered. The ultimate aim is to incorporate the concept of precision medicine in the field of ALL through valid prediction platform to facilitate the selection of the most suitable treatment approach.

Validation of a novel NGS based BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutation detection assay in Indian cohort

The efficacy and treatment outcome of a CML patient are heavily dependent on BCR::ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status. Next-generation sequencing technology is a bright alternative to the previously used sanger sequencing method due to its global presence in diagnostic setups, massive parallel sequencing ability, and far better sensitivity. In the present study, we have demonstrated a new protocol for kinase domain mutation analysis using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) method using the ion torrent sequencing platform. This protocol uses RNA as the starting material, followed by nested PCR to amplify the fusion transcript, which is subsequently used as a template for NGS. Initial validation and comparison of this assay with the sanger sequencing (SS) method yielded 95.23% agreement. CML samples (n = 121) with a failure to TKI response were subjected to this newly developed NGS-based assay to detect KD mutations, from which samples were found to have mutations with a sensitivity ranging from 2.32 to 93.41%. A total of 34.71% of samples (n = 42) were found to be positive for one or more KD mutations, whereas 65.29% of samples (n = 81) were found to be negative. Nine samples out of 42 positive samples, i.e., 21.42%, were found to have compound mutations. This is one of the first studies from India, which includes more than 160 samples and is analyzed by the NGS approach for KD mutation analysis.

Mutation analysis of BCR-ABL1 kinase domain in chronic myeloid leukemia patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitors resistance: a Malaysian cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Mutational analysis of BCR::ABL1 kinase domain (KD) is a crucial component of clinical decision algorithms for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with failure or warning responses to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. This study aimed to detect BCR::ABL1 KD mutations in CML patients with treatment resistance and assess the concordance between NGS (next generation sequencing) and Sanger sequencing (SS) in detecting these mutations.

RESULTS

In total, 12 different BCR::ABL1 KD mutations were identified by SS in 22.6% (19/84) of patients who were resistant to TKI treatment. Interestingly, NGS analysis of the same patient group revealed an additional four different BCR::ABL1 KD mutations in 27.4% (23/84) of patients. These mutations are M244V, A344V, E355A, and E459K with variant read frequency below 15%. No mutation was detected in 18 patients with optimal response to TKI therapy. Resistance to TKIs is associated with the acquisition of additional mutations in BCR::ABL1 KD after treatment with TKIs. Additionally, the use of NGS is advised for accurately determining the mutation status of BCR::ABL1 KD, particularly in cases where the allele frequency is low, and for identifying mutations across multiple exons simultaneously. Therefore, the utilization of NGS as a diagnostic platform for this test is very promising to guide therapeutic decision-making.

Screening and Activity Evaluation of Novel BCR-ABL/T315I Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a kind of malignant tumor formed by the clonal proliferation of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells. BCR-ABL fusion protein, found in more than 90% of patients, is a vital target for discovering anti- CML drugs. Up to date, imatinib is the first BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) approved by the FDA for treating CML. However, the drug resistance problems appeared for many reasons, especially the T135I mutation, a "gatekeeper" of BCR-ABL. Currently, there is no long-term effective and low side effect drug in clinical.

METHODS

This study intends to find novel TKIs targeting BCR-ABL with high inhibitory activity against T315I mutant protein by combining artificial intelligence technology and cell growth curve, cytotoxicity, flow cytometry and Western blot experiments.

RESULTS

The obtained compound was found to kill leukemia cells, which had good inhibitory efficacy in BaF3/T315I cells. Compound no 4 could induce cell cycle arrest, cause autophagy and apoptosis, and inhibit the phosphorylation of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase, STAT5 and Crkl proteins.

CONCLUSION

The results indicated that the screened compound could be used as a lead compound for further research to discover ideal chronic myeloid leukemia therapeutic drugs.

Genetic Landscape of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and a Novel Targeted Drug for Overcoming Resistance

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) exemplify the success of molecular targeted therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, some patients do not respond to TKI therapy. Mutations in the kinase domain of BCR::ABL1 are the most extensively studied mechanism of TKI resistance in CML, but BCR::ABL1-independent mechanisms are involved in some cases. There are two known types of mechanisms that contribute to resistance: mutations in known cancer-related genes; and Philadelphia-associated rearrangements, a novel mechanism of genomic heterogeneity that occurs at the time of the Philadelphia chromosome formation. Most chronic-phase and accelerated-phase CML patients who were treated with the third-generation TKI for drug resistance harbored one or more cancer gene mutations. Cancer gene mutations and additional chromosomal abnormalities were found to be independently associated with progression-free survival. The novel agent asciminib specifically inhibits the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) and shows better efficacy and less toxicity than other TKIs due to its high target specificity. In the future, pooled analyses of various studies should address whether additional genetic analyses could guide risk-adapted therapy and lead to a final cure for CML.

A customized mass array panel for BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain mutation screening in chronic myeloid leukemia

Introduction

The therapeutic strategy and management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) have rapidly improved with the discovery of effective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to target BCR::ABL1 oncoprotein. However, nearly 30% of patients develop TKI resistance due to acquired mutations on the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) of BCR::ABL1.

Methods

We customized a mass array panel initially intended to detect and monitor the mutational burden of hotspot BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations accumulated in our database, including key mutations recently recommended by European LeukemiaNet. Additionally, we extended the feasibility of using the assay panel for the molecular classification of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) by incorporating primer sets specific for analyzing JAK2 V617F, MPL 515 K/L, and CALR types 1 and 2.

Results

We found that the developed mass array panel was superior for detecting and monitoring clinically significant BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations, especially in cases with low mutational burden and harboring compound/polyclonal mutations, compared with direct sequencing. Moreover, our customized mass array panel detected common genetic alterations in MPNs, and the findings were consistent with those of other comparable assays available in our laboratory.

Conclusions

Our customized mass array panel was practicably used as a routine robust assay for screening and monitoring BCR::ABL1 TKD mutations in patients with CML undergoing TKI treatment and feasible for analyzing common genetic mutations in MPNs.

PROTAC: targeted drug strategy. Principles and limitations

The PROTAC (PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera) technology is a method of targeting intracellular proteins previously considered undruggable. This technology utilizes the ubiquitin-proteasome system in cells to specifically degrade target proteins, thereby offering significant advantages over conventional small-molecule inhibitors of the enzymatic function. Preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of PROTAC-based compounds (degraders) are presented. The review considers the general principles of the design of degraders. Advances and challenges of the PROTAC technology are discussed.

From bench to bedside: bridging the gaps in best practices for real-world chronic myeloid leukemia care

INTRODUCTION

Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) determined an improvement of responses and overall survival (OS) in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients, some patients still fail the achievement of important milestones.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we focus on the need of appropriate molecular and mutational monitoring during TKI treatment with new laboratory tools and on new compounds developed to counteract the unmet clinical need in CP-CML.

EXPERT OPINION

The appropriate identification of BCR::ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms of resistance with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) can allow to improve the therapeutic strategies and prevent the onset of a failure to treatment. New compounds have been recently approved or are still in investigational trials to improve the response in some critical forms of resistance and/or intolerance to available TKIs.

Droplet digital PCR for the detection of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia

One of the indications for BCR::ABL1 mutation testing in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is when tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy (TKI) needs to be changed for unsatisfactory response. In this study, we evaluated a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR)-based multiplex strategy for the detection and quantitation of transcripts harbouring mutations conferring resistance to second-generation TKIs (2GTKIs). Parallel quantitation of e13a2, e14a2 and e1a2 BCR::ABL1 fusion transcripts enables to express results as percentage of mutation positive- over total BCR::ABL1 transcripts. We determined the limit of blank in 60 mutation-negative samples. Accuracy was demonstrated by further analysis of 48 samples already studied by next generation sequencing (NGS). Mutations could be called down to 0.5% and across 3-logs of BCR::ABL1 levels. Retrospective review of BCR::ABL1 NGS results in 513 consecutive CML patients with non-optimal response to first- or second-line TKI therapy suggested that a ddPCR-based approach targeted against 2GTKI-resistant mutations would score samples as mutation-negative in 22% of patients with warning response to imatinib but only in 6% of patients with warning response to 2GTKIs. We conclude ddPCR represents an attractive method for easy, accurate and rapid screening for 2GTKI-resistant mutations impacting on TKI selection, although ddPCR cannot identify compound mutations.

Genomic Mechanisms Influencing Outcome in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) represents the disease prototype of genetically based diagnosis and management. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), that target the causal BCR::ABL1 fusion protein, exemplify the success of molecularly based therapy. Most patients now have long-term survival; however, TKI resistance is a persistent clinical problem. TKIs are effective in the BCR::ABL1-driven chronic phase of CML but are relatively ineffective for clinically defined advanced phases. Genomic investigation of drug resistance using next-generation sequencing for CML has lagged behind other hematological malignancies. However, emerging data show that genomic abnormalities are likely associated with suboptimal response and drug resistance. This has already been supported by the presence of BCR::ABL1 kinase domain mutations in drug resistance, which led to the development of more potent TKIs. Next-generation sequencing studies are revealing additional mutations associated with resistance. In this review, we discuss the initiating chromosomal translocation that may not always be a straightforward reciprocal event between chromosomes 9 and 22 but can sometimes be accompanied by sequence deletion, inversion, and rearrangement. These events may biologically reflect a more genomically unstable disease prone to acquire mutations. We also discuss the future role of cancer-related gene mutation analysis for risk stratification in CML.

Overcoming Resistance to Kinase Inhibitors: The Paradigm of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Protein kinases (PKs) play crucial roles in cellular proliferation and survival, hence their deregulation is a common event in the pathogenesis of solid and hematologic malignancies. Targeting PKs has been a promising strategy in cancer treatment, and there are now a variety of approved anticancer drugs targeting PKs. However, the phenomenon of resistance remains an obstacle to be addressed and overcoming resistance is a goal to be achieved. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the first as well as one of the best examples of a cancer that can be targeted by molecular therapy; hence, it can be used as a model disease for other cancers. This review aims to summarize up-to-date knowledge on the main mechanisms implicated in resistance to PK inhibitory therapies and to outline the main strategies that are being explored to overcome resistance. The importance of molecular diagnostics and disease monitoring in counteracting resistance will also be discussed.

Genetic Landscape of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with an Emphasis on Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory Testing

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell neoplasms with driver events including the BCR-ABL1 translocation leading to a diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), or somatic mutations in JAK2, CALR, or MPL resulting in Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs with constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. In the Philadelphia-chromosome-negative MPNs, modern sequencing panels have identified a vast molecular landscape including additional mutations in genes involved in splicing, signal transduction, DNA methylation, and chromatin modification such as ASXL1, SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1. These additional mutations often influence prognosis in MPNs and therefore are increasingly important for risk stratification. This review focuses on the molecular alterations within the WHO classification of MPNs and laboratory testing used for diagnosis.

The role of ponatinib in adult BCR-ABL1 positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic transplantation: a real-life retrospective multicenter study

The experience of third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib treatment in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Ph'+ ALL) patients post-allogeneic transplantation is limited. We retrospectively collected data on 25 Ph'+ ALL patients who were started on ponatinib after allogeneic transplantation between July 2015 and July 2019 from nine transplantation centers in Italy. Ponatinib was given in prophylaxis in five (20%), as pre-emptive treatment in seven (28%), and as salvage therapy in thirteen (52%) patients. It was combined with donor leukocyte infusions in ten patients. Half of the patients (12/25) harbored T315I mutation of BCR/ABL1, while in the remaining mutational analysis was negative or not performed. Among the 20 patients who received ponatinib as pre-emptive/salvage treatment, complete molecular response was achieved in 15 (75%) patients. Estimated overall survival at 2-year post-initiation of treatment in the whole cohort was 65% (respectively 60%, 60%, and 78% for the prophylaxis, pre-emptive, and salvage therapy groups). In patients with T315I-positive mutational status, the estimated 2-year survival was 40%. Fourteen patients (56%) experienced toxicity, requiring temporary or definitive suspension of treatment. In conclusion, treatment of Ph'+ ALL patients with ponatinib after transplantation is effective, although the question of adequate drug dose and treatment duration remains unanswered.

Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point?

Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation testing have a well consolidated role in the routine management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, as they provide precious information for therapeutic decision-making. Molecular response levels are used to define whether a patient has an "optimal", "warning", or "failure" response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Mutation status may be useful to decide whether TKI therapy should be changed and which alternative TKI (or TKIs) are most likely to be effective. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-qPCR) and Sanger sequencing are currently the gold standard for molecular response monitoring and mutation testing, respectively. However, in recent years, novel technologies such as digital PCR (dPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been evaluated. Here, we critically describe the main features of these old and novel technologies, provide an overview of the recently published studies assessing the potential clinical value of dPCR and NGS, and discuss how the state of the art might evolve in the next years.

Managing chronic myeloid leukemia for treatment-free remission: a proposal from the GIMEMA CML WP

Several papers authored by international experts have proposed recommendations on the management of BCR-ABL1+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Following these recommendations, survival of CML patients has become very close to normal. The next, ambitious, step is to bring as many patients as possible into a condition of treatment-free remission (TFR). The Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA; Italian Group for Hematologic Diseases of the Adult) CML Working Party (WP) has developed a project aimed at selecting the treatment policies that may increase the probability of TFR, taking into account 4 variables: the need for TFR, the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the characteristics of leukemia, and the patient. A Delphi-like method was used to reach a consensus among the representatives of 50 centers of the CML WP. A consensus was reached on the assessment of disease risk (EUTOS Long Term Survival [ELTS] score), on the definition of the most appropriate age boundaries for the choice of first-line treatment, on the choice of the TKI for first-line treatment, and on the definition of the responses that do not require a change of the TKI (BCR-ABL1 ≤10% at 3 months, ≤1% at 6 months, ≤0.1% at 12 months, ≤0.01% at 24 months), and of the responses that require a change of the TKI, when the goal is TFR (BCR-ABL1 >10% at 3 and 6 months, >1% at 12 months, and >0.1% at 24 months). These suggestions may help optimize the treatment strategy for TFR.

A genome-scale CRISPR knock-out screen in chronic myeloid leukemia identifies novel drug resistance mechanisms along with intrinsic apoptosis and MAPK signaling

Understanding resistance mechanisms in cancer is of utmost importance for the discovery of novel "druggable" targets. Efficient genetic screening, now even more possible with CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology, next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics, is an important tool for deciphering novel cellular processes, such as resistance to treatment in cancer. Imatinib specifically eliminates chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) cells by targeting and blocking the kinase activity of BCR-ABL1; however, resistance to treatment exists. In order to discover BCR-ABL1 independent mechanisms of imatinib resistance, we utilized the genome-scale CRISPR knock-out library to screen for imatinib-sensitizing genes in vitro on K562 cells. We revealed genes that seem essential for imatinib-induced cell death, such as proapoptotic genes (BIM, BAX) or MAPK inhibitor SPRED2. Specifically, reestablishing apoptosis in BIM knock-out (KO) cells with BH3 mimetics, or inhibiting MAPK signaling in SPRED2 KO cells with MEK inhibitors restores sensitivity to imatinib. In this work, we discovered previously identified pathways and novel pathways that modulate response to imatinib in CML cell lines, such as the implication of the Mediator complex, mRNA processing and protein ubiquitinylation. Targeting these specific genetic lesions with combinational therapy can overcome resistance phenotypes and paves the road for the use of precision oncology.

Prospective assessment of NGS-detectable mutations in CML patients with nonoptimal response: the NEXT-in-CML study

In chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may select for drug-resistant BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutants. Although Sanger sequencing (SS) is considered the gold standard for BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has recently been assessed in retrospective studies. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study (NEXT-in-CML) to assess the frequency and clinical relevance of low-level mutations and the feasibility, cost, and turnaround times of NGS-based BCR-ABL1 mutation screening in a routine setting. A series of 236 consecutive CML patients with failure (n = 124) or warning (n = 112) response to TKI therapy were analyzed in parallel by SS and NGS in 1 of 4 reference laboratories. Fifty-one patients (22 failure, 29 warning) who were negative for mutations by SS had low-level mutations detectable by NGS. Moreover, 29 (27 failure, 2 warning) of 60 patients who were positive for mutations by SS showed additional low-level mutations. Thus, mutations undetectable by SS were identified in 80 out of 236 patients (34%), of whom 42 (18% of the total) had low-level mutations somehow relevant for clinical decision making. Prospective monitoring of mutation kinetics demonstrated that TKI-resistant low-level mutations are invariably selected if the patients are not switched to another TKI or if they are switched to a inappropriate TKI or TKI dose. The NEXT-in-CML study provides for the first time robust demonstration of the clinical relevance of low-level mutations, supporting the incorporation of NGS-based BCR-ABL1 KD mutation screening results in the clinical decision algorithms.

Expert opinion-management of chronic myeloid leukemia after resistance to second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Regardless of line of therapy, treatment goals in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are: avoid progression to accelerated phase or blast crisis CML such that patients achieve a life expectancy comparable with that of the general population; avoid adverse events (AEs); and restore and maintain quality of life. The most important prognostic factor for achieving these goals is response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at key milestones. For patients failing a TKI, a treatment change is mandatory to limit the risk of progression and death. There is currently no precise guideline for patients that fail a second-generation TKI, and there is a paucity of data to guide clinical decision making in this setting. There is, therefore, an unmet need for practical and actionable guidance on how to manage patients who fail a second-generation TKI. Although the term 'failure' includes patients failing for resistance or intolerance, the focus of this paper is failure of a second-generation TKI because of resistance. CML patients who fail their first second-generation TKI for true resistance need a more potent therapy. In these patients, the key issues to consider are the relative appropriateness of early allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or the use of a further TKI. Selection of the next line of treatment after second-generation TKI resistance should be individualized and must be based on patient-specific factors including cytogenetics, mutation profile, comorbidities, age, previous history of AEs with prior TKI therapy, and risk profile for AEs on specific TKIs. This expert opinion paper is not in conflict with existing recommendations, but instead represents an evolution of previous notions, based on new data, insights, and clinical experience. We review the treatment options for patients resistant to second-generation TKI therapy and provide our clinical opinions and guidance on key considerations for treatment decision making.

Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Recent Advances

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm caused by the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene generation as a consequence of the t(9;22)(q34;q11) rearrangement. The identification of the BCR-ABL1 transcript was of critical importance for both CML diagnosis and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. In this review, we report the recent advances in the CML MRD monitoring based on RNA, DNA and protein analysis. The detection of the BCR-ABL1 transcript by the quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard method, but other systems based on digital PCR or on GeneXpert technology have been developed. In the last years, DNA-based assays showed high sensitivity and specificity, and flow cytometric approaches for the detection of the BCR-ABL1 fusion protein have also been tested. Recently, new MRD monitoring systems based on the detection of molecular markers other than the BCR-ABL1 fusion were proposed. These approaches, such as the identification of CD26+ leukemic stem cells, microRNAs and mitochondrial DNA mutations, just remain preliminary and need to be implemented. In the precision medicine era, the constant improvement of the CML MRD monitoring practice could allow clinicians to choose the best therapeutic algorithm and a more accurate selection of CML patients eligible for the tyrosine kinase inhibitors discontinuation.

The multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ponatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia: Real-world data

Development of the highly selective targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has expanded the therapeutic options for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients undergoing TKI therapy should be closely monitored to ensure that the best therapeutic response and quality of life are achieved, and to control suboptimal responses and adverse events. Despite the high rate of response using current first-line TKIs, treatment failure may still occur, and resistance is considered a challenge in the treatment of patients with CML. The third-generation TKI, ponatinib, is a potent orally bioavailable pan BCR-ABL inhibitor that inhibits both wild-type and mutant BCR-ABL1 kinase, including the "gatekeeper" T315I mutation, which is resistant to all other currently available TKIs. This paper reviews the effectiveness, feasibility, and safety of ponatinib in the real-life clinical management of CML. Potential prognostic factors in identifying patients most likely to benefit from ponatinib treatment will be discussed, and case presentations illustrating situations encountered in real-life clinical practice are described. Ponatinib is effective in patients who have received prior TKIs in clinical studies as well as under real-life conditions. Nevertheless, the risk/benefit balance must be evaluated for each patient, particularly considering disease state, mutational status, treatment line, intolerance/resistance to prior TKIs, age, frailty, and specific comorbidities.

Next-generation sequencing for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A position paper

Emergence of clones carrying point mutations in the BCR‐ABL1 kinase domain (KD) is a common mechanism of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)‐based therapies in Philadelphia chromosome‐positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Sanger sequencing (SS) is the most frequently used method for diagnostic BCR‐ABL1 KD mutation screening, but it has some limitations—it is poorly sensitive and cannot robustly identify compound mutations. Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) may overcome these problems. NSG is increasingly available and has the potential to become the method of choice for diagnostic BCR‐ABL1 KD mutation screening. A group discussion within an ad hoc constituted Panel of Experts has produced a series of consensus‐based statements on the potential value of NGS testing before and during first‐line TKI‐based treatment, in relapsed/refractory cases, before and after allo‐stem cell transplantation, and on how NGS results may impact on therapeutic decisions. A set of minimal technical and methodological requirements for the analysis and the reporting of results has also been defined. The proposals herein reported may be used to guide the practical use of NGS for BCR‐ABL1 KD mutation testing in Ph+ ALL.

New approaches to molecular monitoring in CML (and other diseases)

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is the model cancer, demonstrating the clinical benefits of targeted therapy and the power of molecular diagnostics and monitoring. In CML, the BCR-ABL1 fusion gene and its companion messenger RNA offers a unique target differentiating cancer from the normal cell, affording the potential for very sensitive and specific assays. Because CML is such an ideal model, new methods are arising that should make testing in CML faster, more reliable, and reach a greater sensitivity. New ultrasensitive sequencing approaches, coupled with single-cell genomic approaches, further the study of measurable residual disease, clonal heterogeneity, and promise to make clinical trials more innovative and informative. These methods should be able to be transferred to other hematological and solid malignancies.

Nanopore Sequencing in Blood Diseases: A Wide Range of Opportunities

The molecular pathogenesis of hematological diseases is often driven by genetic and epigenetic alterations. Next-generation sequencing has considerably increased our genomic knowledge of these disorders becoming ever more widespread in clinical practice. In 2012 Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) released the MinION, the first long-read nanopore-based sequencer, overcoming the main limits of short-reads sequences generation. In the last years, several nanopore sequencing approaches have been performed in various "-omic" sciences; this review focuses on the challenge to introduce ONT devices in the hematological field, showing advantages, disadvantages and future perspectives of this technology in the precision medicine era.

Anticipate Your Next Move in Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patient Management

Treatment decisions in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) are complex and require the evaluation of many factors at each stage of therapy. Many patients will become resistant or intolerant to the first and subsequent lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) they receive, requiring them to switch to a different TKI. Clinicians are faced with many considerations when choosing subsequent treatments and an important issue is how best to manage failure on a second-generation TKI. During an interactive and case-based, Incyte-sponsored, satellite symposium at the 2019 European Hematology Association (EHA) congress, Dr Janssen and Prof Apperley discussed the current best practices for managing patients failing imatinib or second-generation TKI, considering whether second-generation TKI should be used sequentially and the timing of the introduction of a third-generation TKI (ponatinib). Dr Soverini and Dr de Lavallade discussed how regular BCR-ABL response monitoring and mutational analysis are integral to CML patient management. They highlighted the clinical relevance of low-level mutations and the necessity to prevent clonal expansion of these TKI-resistant mutants, and the accumulation of additional mutations, by switching to an effective TKI in a timely manner.

Curing Ph+ ALL: assessing the relative contributions of chemotherapy, TKIs, and allogeneic stem cell transplant

The understanding and treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia have changed rapidly in the past 10 years. The outcome is equally as good as for Ph- disease, and with targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies in addition to chemotherapy, the novel immunotherapy approaches, and the extension of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) to older individuals, there is the potential to exceed this outcome. There is particular interest in reducing chemotherapy exposure and considering for whom allo-HCT can be avoided. However, the patient population that can help test these options in clinical trials is limited in number, and the available evidence is often derived from single-arm studies. This paper summarizes outcomes achieved with recent approaches to de novo Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the postimatinib era and helps integrate all the available information to assist the reader to make informed choices for patients in an increasingly complex field.

Next-generation sequencing for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation testing in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: a position paper

BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation status is considered to be an important element of clinical decision algorithms for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients who do not achieve an optimal response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Conventional Sanger sequencing is the method currently recommended to test BCR-ABL1 KD mutations. However, Sanger sequencing has limited sensitivity and cannot always discriminate between polyclonal and compound mutations. The use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) is increasingly widespread in diagnostic laboratories and represents an attractive alternative. Currently available data on the clinical impact of NGS-based mutational testing in CML patients do not allow recommendations with a high grade of evidence to be prepared. This article reports the results of a group discussion among an ad hoc expert panel with the objective of producing recommendations on the appropriateness of clinical decisions about the indication for NGS, the performance characteristics of NGS platforms, and the therapeutic changes that could be applied based on the use of NGS in CML. Overall, these recommendations might be employed to inform clinicians about the practical use of NGS in CML.

Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Advanced Phase

Management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in advanced phases remains a challenge also in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) treatment. Cytogenetic clonal evolution and development of resistant mutations represent crucial events that limit the benefit of subsequent therapies in these patients. CML is diagnosed in accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) in <5% of patients, and the availability of effective treatments for chronic phase (CP) has dramatically reduced progressions on therapy. Due to smaller number of patients, few randomized studies are available in this setting and evidences are limited. Nevertheless, three main scenarios may be drawn: (a) patients diagnosed in AP are at higher risk of failure as compared to CP patients, but if they achieve optimal responses with frontline TKI treatment their outcome may be similarly favorable; (b) patients diagnosed in BP may be treated with TKI alone or with TKI together with conventional chemotherapy regimens, and subsequent transplant decisions should rely on kinetics of response and individual transplant risk; (c) patients in CP progressing under TKI treatment represent the most challenging population and they should be treated with alternative TKI according to the mutational profile, optional chemotherapy in BP patients, and transplant should be considered in suitable cases after return to second CP. Due to lack of validated and reliable markers to predict blast crisis and the still unsatisfactory results of treatments in this setting, prevention of progression by careful selection of frontline treatment in CP and early treatment intensification in non-optimal responders remains the main goal. Personalized evaluation of response kinetics could help in identifying patients at risk for progression.

Effect of low-level BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations identified by next-generation sequencing in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Kinase domain mutations in BCR-ABL1 are associated with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows detection of low-level kinase domain mutations, but its relevance in clinical practice remains debated. We aimed to examine the clinical effects of low-level kinase domain mutations identified using NGS in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia.

METHODS

In this population-based study, we included consecutive patients newly diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and patients identified at the time of resistance to first-line treatment with imatinib at six institutions (teaching hospitals and district hospitals) in southeast England. We screened patients for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations using NGS, irrespective of patient response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. When we detected a mutation with NGS, we retrospectively analysed all previous samples to establish the date of first occurrence and subsequent kinetics of the mutant subclone (or subclones). The primary endpoints of this study were progression-free and event-free survival at 5 years.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2014, we screened 121 patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation. 99 consecutive patients were newly diagnosed, with available sequential RNA stored. The remaining 22 patients were diagnosed between June 1, 1999, and June 30, 2006, and were screened at the time of resistance to first-line treatment with imatinib. Imatinib was the first-line treatment for 111 patients, nilotinib for seven patients, and dasatinib for three patients. We detected a kinase domain mutation in 25 (21%) of 121 patients. Low-level kinase domain mutations were first identified in 17 (68%) of 25 patients with mutation. For patients with a complete cytogenetic response, 13 (14%) of 93 patients screened had a mutation. Five (71%) of the seven patients with a clinically relevant mutation lost complete cytogenetic response compared with 15 (17%) of 86 patients without a clinically relevant mutation (80 patients without mutation and six patients with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor-sensitive mutation, p=0·0031). Patients harbouring a mutant clone had poorer 5-year progression-free survival (65·3% [95% CI 40·5-81·8] vs 86·9% [75·8-93·2]; p=0·0161) and poorer 5-year event-free survival (22·2% [CI 5·6-45·9] vs 62·0% [50·4-71·6]; p<0·0001) than did patients without a mutation. We identified a kinase domain mutation in four (10%) of 41 patients with samples available at 3 months after starting first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment; all four subsequently progressed to accelerated phase disease compared with only three (8%) of 37 without a mutation (p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

NGS reliably and consistently detected early appearance of kinase domain mutations that would not otherwise be detected by Sanger sequencing. For the first time, to our knowledge, we report the presence of kinase domain mutations after only 3 months of therapy, which could have substantial clinical implications. NGS will allow early clinical intervention and our findings will contribute to the establishment of new recommendations on the frequency of kinase domain mutation analysis to improve patient clinical care.

FUNDING

None.

[Recommendations from the French CML Study Group (Fi-LMC) for BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutation analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia]

In the context of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) resistant to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations still remain the sole biological marker that directly condition therapeutic decision. These recommendations aim at updating the use of BCR-ABL1 mutation testing with respect to new available therapeutic options and at repositioning different testing methods at the era of next generation sequencing (NGS). They have been written by a panel of experts from the French Study Group on CML (Fi-LMC), after a critical review of relevant publications. TKD mutation testing is recommended in case of treatment failure but not in case of optimal response. For patients in warning situation, mutation testing must be discussed depending on the type of TKI used, lasting of the treatment, kinetic evolution of BCR-ABL1 transcripts along time and necessity for switching treatment. The kind and the frequency of TKD mutations occasioning resistance mainly depend on the TKI in use and disease phase. Because of its better sensitivity, NGS methods are recommended for mutation testing rather than Sanger's. Facing a given TKD mutation, therapeutic decision should be taken based on in vitro sensitivity and clinical efficacy data. Identification by sequencing of a TKD mutation known to induce resistance must lead to a therapeutic change. The clinical value of testing methods more sensitive than NGS remains to be assessed.

[Clinical characteristics of chronic myeloid leukemia with T315I mutation and the efficacy of ponatinib]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical features of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with T315 I mutation (CML-T315I) and compare the effectiveness of different treatments.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and outcomes of 19 patients with CML-T315I receiving different treatments. The T315 I mutations in these patients were detected by examination of BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutation by RTQ-PCR and Sanger sequencing. The relapse following the treatments, defined as hematological, cytogenetic and molecular biological recurrences, were analyzed in these patients.

RESULTS

Of the 19 patients with CML-T315I, 14 (73.7%) were in CML-CP stage at the initial diagnosis, and 13 (81.2%) were high-risk patients based on the Sokal scores. All the 19 patients were treated with TKI after the initial diagnosis, and during the treatment, 15 (78.9%) patients were found to have additional chromosomal aberrations, and 10 (52.6%) had multiple mutations; 13 (68.4%) of the patients experienced disease progression (accelerated phase/blast crisis) before the detection of T315I mutation, with a median time of 40 months (5-120 months) from the initial diagnosis to the mutation detection. After detection of the mutation, 12 patients were treated with ponatinib and 7 were managed with the conventional chemotherapy regimen, and their overall survival rates at 3 years were 83.3% and 14.2%, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CML patients resistant to TKI are more likely to have T315I mutations, whose detection rate is significantly higher in the progressive phase than in the chronic phase. These patients often have additional chromosomal aberrations and multiple gene mutations with poor prognoses and a high recurrence rate even after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Long-term maintenance therapy with ponatinib may improve the prognosis and prolong the survival time of the patients.

Compound mutations involving T315I and P-loop mutations are the major components of multiple mutations detected in tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant chronic myeloid leukemia

To analyze the pattern of multiple mutations detected by Sanger sequencing (SS), we performed subcloning sequencing using 218 samples from 45 patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant chronic myeloid leukemia. At the first time of multiple mutation detection by SS (baseline), a total of 19 major mutations from 45 samples were detected; these mutations were found in the following order: T315I (68.9%), E255 K (33.3%), Y253H (13.3%), G250E (13.3%), and F317 L (11.1%). Subcloning sequencing of 900 baseline colonies identified 556 different mutant types, and 791 among the 900 were colonies with major mutations (87.9%). The mutations were found in the following order: T315I (36.4%), E255 K (16.2%), Y253H (7.0%), G250E (6.7%), M351 T (6.6%), and E255 V (5.3%). In subcloning sequencing with 4357 colonies of 218 serial samples, 2506 colonies (57.5%) had compound mutations, among which 2238 colonies (89.3%) had at least one major mutation. The median number of mutations in compound mutant colonies was 2 (range, 2-7), and most were double (52.9%) or triple (28.7%) mutations. Additionally, some mutations in allosteric binding sites were detected as low level mutation in 13 patients. With the available retrospective samples before baseline, subcloning sequencing identified low-level mutations of various frequencies (median, 10%) to be major mutations in 20 patients. Thus, compound mutations involving T315I and P-loop mutations were the major components of multiple mutations, and some low-level mutations with potential clinical significance were detected by subcloning sequencing. Hence, more sensitive sequencing assays are needed in patients with multiple mutations.

Direct and rapid identification of T315I-Mutated BCR-ABL expressing leukemic cells using infrared microspectroscopy

Despite the major success obtained by the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), resistances to therapies occur due to mutations in the ABL-kinase domain of the BCR-ABL oncogene. Amongst these mutations, the "gatekeeper" T315I is a major concern as it renders leukemic cells resistant to all licenced TKI except Ponatinib. We report here that Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) microspectroscopy is a powerful methodology allowing rapid and direct identification of a spectral signature in single cells expressing T315I-mutated BCR-ABL. The specificity of this spectral signature is confirmed using a Dox-inducible T315I-mutated BCR-ABL-expressing human UT-7 cells as well as in murine embryonic stem cells. Transcriptome analysis of UT-7 cells expressing BCR-ABL as compared to BCR-ABL T315I clearly identified a molecular signature which could be at the origin of the generation of metabolic changes giving rise to the spectral signature. Thus, these results suggest that this new methodology can be applied to the identification of leukemic cells harbouring the T315I mutation at the single cell level and could represent a novel early detection tool of mutant clones. It could also be applied to drug screening strategies to target T315I-mutated leukemic cells.

The hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms do not influence the pharmacodynamics of nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

First-line nilotinib in chronic myeloid leukemia is more effective than imatinib to achieve early and deep molecular responses, despite poor tolerability or failure observed in one-third of patients. The toxicity and efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors might depend on the activity of transmembrane transporters. However, the impact of transporters genes polymorphisms in nilotinib setting is still debated. We investigated the possible correlation between single nucleotide polymorphisms of hOCT1 (rs683369 [c.480C>G]) and ABCB1 (rs1128503 [c.1236C>T], rs2032582 [c.2677G>T/A], rs1045642 [c.3435C>T]) and nilotinib efficacy and toxicity in a cohort of 78 patients affected by chronic myeloid leukemia in the context of current clinical practice. The early molecular response was achieved by 81% of patients while 64% of them attained deep molecular response (median time, 26 months). The 36-month event-free survival was 86%, whereas 58% of patients experienced toxicities. Interestingly, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms alone or in combination did not influence event-free survival or the adverse events rate. Therefore, in contrast to data obtained in patients treated with imatinib, hOCT1 and ABCB1 polymorphisms do not impact on nilotinib efficacy or toxicity. This could be relevant in the choice of the first-line therapy: patients with polymorphisms that negatively condition imatinib efficacy might thus receive nilotinib as first-line therapy.

Ponatinib as a Valid Alternative Strategy in Patients with Blast Crisis-Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Not Eligible for Allogeneic Stem Cells Transplantation and/or Conventional Chemotherapy: Report of a Case

Currently, imatinib and dasatinib are the only tyrosine-kinase inhibitors approved in the US and Europe for the treatment of blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML) at diagnosis, while ponatinib is the only inhibitor used in patients bearing T315I mutation. Here we report the case of a 61-year-old man diagnosed with B-cell lymphoid BC-CML, initially treated with imatinib 800 mg day and then with dasatinib 140 mg day because of intolerance. A complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was achieved at three months; however, three months later a relapse was observed, and the T315I mutation was detected. Ponatinib 45 mg once daily was then started together with a short course of chemotherapy. Bone marrow evaluation after six months of therapy showed the regaining of CCyR, together with the achievement of a deep molecular response. However, one year from ponatinib start the patient experienced a new disease relapse; he was effectively treated with ponatinib and chemotherapy once again, but in the meanwhile an ischemic stroke was detected. This case report confirms the high efficacy of ponatinib monotherapy in BC-CML patients, representing a valid option for non-allogeneic stem cells transplantation eligible cases and the only one available for those carrying the T315I mutation.

Enigmas in tumor resistance to kinase inhibitors and calculation of the drug resistance index for cancer (DRIC)

Darwinian selection is also applicable when antibiotics, the immune system or other host factors shape the repertoire of microorganisms, and similarly, clonal selection is the hallmark of tumor evolution. The ongoing revolution in new anti-cancer treatment modalities, combined with an unprecedented precision in characterizing malignant clones at the level below one percent, profoundly improves the understanding of repertoire-tuning mechanisms. There is no fundamental difference between selection of the tumor cells in the presence, or absence, of therapy. However, under treatment the influence of a single agent can be measured, simplifying the analysis. Because of their beneficial and selective therapeutic effect, the focus in this review is set on protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs), predominantly tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This is one of the most rapidly growing families of novel cancer medicines. In order to limit the number of drugs, the following representative target kinases are included: ALK, BCR-ABL, BRAF, BTK, and EGFR. A key therapeutic challenge is how to reduce tumor growth after treatment, since this is rate-limiting for the generation and expansion of more malignant escape mutants. Thus, upon efficient treatment, tumor cell loss often enables a profoundly increased growth rate among resistant cells. Strategies to reduce this risk, such as concomitant, competitive outgrowth of non-transformed cells, are described. Seven parameters: 1. Drug type, 2. tumor type, 3. presence of metastases or phenotypic change, 4. tumor cell number, 5. net growth rate (proliferation minus cell death), 6. inherited genetic- and 7. epigenetic- variations are crucial for drug responses. It is envisaged that it might become possible to calculate a clinically relevant Drug Resistance Index for Cancer (DRIC) for each patient.

In chronic myeloid leukemia patients on second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, deep sequencing of BCR-ABL1 at the time of warning may allow sensitive detection of emerging drug-resistant mutants

Background

Imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients receiving second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy with dasatinib or nilotinib have a higher risk of disease relapse and progression and not infrequently BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutations are implicated in therapeutic failure. In this setting, earlier detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 KD mutations would offer greater chances of efficacy for subsequent salvage therapy and limit the biological consequences of full BCR-ABL1 kinase reactivation. Taking advantage of an already set up and validated next-generation deep amplicon sequencing (DS) assay, we aimed to assess whether DS may allow a larger window of detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 KD mutants predicting for an impending relapse.

Methods

a total of 125 longitudinal samples from 51 CML patients who had acquired dasatinib- or nilotinib-resistant mutations during second-line therapy were analyzed by DS from the time of failure and mutation detection by conventional sequencing backwards. BCR-ABL1/ABL1%^IS transcript levels were used to define whether the patient had ‘optimal response’, ‘warning’ or ‘failure’ at the time of first mutation detection by DS.

Results

DS was able to backtrack dasatinib- or nilotinib-resistant mutations to the previous sample(s) in 23/51 (45 %) pts. Median mutation burden at the time of first detection by DS was 5.5 % (range, 1.5–17.5 %); median interval between detection by DS and detection by conventional sequencing was 3 months (range, 1–9 months). In 5 cases, the mutations were detectable at baseline. In the remaining cases, response level at the time mutations were first detected by DS could be defined as ‘Warning’ (according to the 2013 ELN definitions of response to 2nd-line therapy) in 13 cases, as ‘Optimal response’ in one case, as ‘Failure’ in 4 cases. No dasatinib- or nilotinib-resistant mutations were detected by DS in 15 randomly selected patients with ‘warning’ at various timepoints, that later turned into optimal responders with no treatment changes.

Conclusions

DS enables a larger window of detection of emerging BCR-ABL1 KD mutations predicting for an impending relapse. A ‘Warning’ response may represent a rational trigger, besides ‘Failure’, for DS-based mutation screening in CML patients undergoing second-line TKI therapy.