Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys

Remifentanil-food choice follows predictions of relative subjective value

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies into drug vs. nondrug choice have emerged to better model and investigate the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying drug preference. Current literature has suggested that drugs of abuse have inherently low value, thus promoting food preference. Herein, we examined remifentanil vs. food choice to test both the relative value hypothesis and the 'direct effects' (pharmacological effects of drugs on alternative reinforcers) hypothesis of opioid preference.

METHODS

Adult male rats were trained under two choice procedures (controlled vs. uncontrolled reinforcer frequency) for remifentanil vs. food choice. Furthermore, a series of procedural manipulations known to affect drug reinforcement were tested under both choice procedures. Using remifentanil self-administration data, pharmacokinetic profiles were calculated and analyzed to determine if opioid intake was related to opioid preference.

RESULTS

Both choice procedures produced dose-dependent preference. Moreover, procedural manipulations produced comparable changes in remifentanil preference under both choice procedures. In addition, calculated pharmacokinetic data revealed that preference was dissociable from intake under the controlled reinforcer frequency choice procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to the 'direct effects' hypothesis, remifentanil preference was better predicted by the relative value hypothesis, formalized in generalized matching. Use of a controlled reinforcer frequency schedule successfully removed the drug preference-intake confound found in most drug-choice procedures. Importantly, drug preference under the controlled reinforcer frequency schedule remained sensitive to procedural manipulations known to affect drug reinforcement. Thus, given that differential drug intake itself affects neurobiological measurements, future use of controlled reinforcer frequency schedules may help to better isolate the neurobehavioral mechanisms that mediate opioid preference.

Neuronal activity associated with cocaine preference: Effects of differential cocaine intake

Differences in overall cocaine intake can directly affect neuroadaptations, and this relationship can make it difficult to interpret neurobiological changes seen in drug-choice studies, since drug intake varies between subjects. Herein, a choice procedure that controls for cocaine intake was utilized to explore if neuronal activity, measured as cFos expression in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and nucleus accumbens (NAc), was reflective of preference. Results demonstrated that cFos expression, in both the OFC and NAc, was independent of cocaine preference when cocaine intake was kept constant across individuals. However, when cocaine intake was systematically varied, the expression of cFos associated with cocaine preference was related to overall cocaine intake in the OFC, but not the NAc. Altogether, these results demonstrate that cocaine intake during choice can affect neurobiological outcome measures; thus, the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying cocaine preference may be better isolated when controlling for cocaine frequency and intake. In all, some caution is warranted when interpreting results from choice studies evaluating the neurobehavioral mechanisms that underlie drug preference when drug frequency and intake are uncontrolled, and future research is needed to determine the role of drug frequency and intake on neurobiological measures associated with drug choice.

Opening the cocaine economy by providing within-session access to a cheaper source of cocaine makes demand for it more elastic

Previous studies found that opening the cocaine economy by providing postsession access to cocaine had no effect on animals' demand for cocaine, whereas postsession access to saccharin or food made demand for these nondrug reinforcers more elastic. It is possible that there was no effect of economy type on cocaine taking in these earlier studies because of the delay to the postsession cocaine in the open economy. The present experiment tested whether forming an open economy by providing additional within-session cocaine, rather than postsession cocaine, would make rats' demand for cocaine more elastic. Saccharin was used as a nondrug comparison reinforcer. Three groups of rats pressed one lever for cocaine and one for saccharin on an ascending series of fixed ratio (FR) schedules where the number of responses required per reinforcer increased from 1 to 48 over sessions. In the open cocaine and open saccharin economy groups, rats had occasional access during the session to a third lever where cocaine or saccharin reinforcers, respectively, were always available on an FR-1 schedule. The main finding was that demand for cocaine was more elastic in the open cocaine economy group than in either of the other groups. Demand for saccharin was more elastic in the open saccharin economy group than in the open cocaine economy group. This study shows that cocaine taking is sensitive to economy type when the additional source of cocaine in an open economy is available close in time to when rats work for cocaine.

Pair housing, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effect of probability presentation order on amphetamine-induced changes in risky choice

Probability discounting is often measured with independent schedules. Independent schedules have several limitations, such as confounding preference for one alternative with frequency of reward presentation and generating ceiling/floor effects at certain probabilities. To address this potential caveat, a controlled reinforcer frequency schedule can be used, in which the manipulandum that leads to reinforcement is pseudo-randomly determined before each trial. This schedule ensures subjects receive equal presentations of the small and large magnitude reinforcers across each block of trials. A total of 24 pair-housed and 11 individually housed female Sprague Dawley rats were tested in a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure. For half of the rats, the odds against (OA) receiving the large magnitude reinforcer increased across the session (ascending schedule); the OA decreased across the session for half of the rats (descending schedule). Following training, rats received treatments of amphetamine (AMPH; 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg; s.c.). For pair-housed rats, AMPH (0.5 mg/kg) increased risky choice, regardless of probability presentation order, whereas a higher dose of AMPH (1.0 mg/kg) decreased discriminability of reinforcer magnitude for rats trained on the descending schedule only. For individually housed rats, probability presentation order modulated the effects of AMPH on probability discounting, as AMPH (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) increased risky choice in rats trained on the ascending schedule but not on the descending schedule. These results show that pair-housing animals, but not using a controlled reinforcer frequency procedure, attenuates the modulatory effects of probability presentation order on drug effects on risky choice.

Rats choose high doses of nicotine in order to compensate for changes in its price and availability

Restricting when and where smoking can occur is a major focus of public health policies in Western countries. In conjunction with increased taxation, these approaches have contributed to a reduction in smoking uptake among adolescents, yet the consequences for established smokers are less clear. In order to further explore this relationship, we developed a novel animal model of restricted nicotine self-administration. Rats were trained to choose between three doses of nicotine (15, 30 and 60 μg/kg/infusion) under conditions where nicotine was (1) freely available at a low cost (20-second post-infusion time-out, fixed-ratio 1 [FR1]), (2) available under restricted access at a low cost (300-second post-infusion time-out, FR1), or (3) freely available at a high cost (20-second post-infusion time-out, FR5). We demonstrate that as access to nicotine is restricted or when cost increases, rats compensate for these changes by increasing their intake of the highest dose of nicotine available. This preference was impervious to treatment with the smoking cessation medication varenicline, but was reduced when the cost of the highest dose only was increased, or when nicotine was again made freely available at a low cost. These results provide the first evidence in rats that nicotine availability and cost influence nicotine choice independently of variations in nicotine and context exposure. They imply that established smokers may compensate for changes in the availability and cost of tobacco by increasing their rate of smoking when they are free to do so.

Cocaine-associated decision-making: Toward isolating preference

Ever-increasing evidence suggests that substance use disorder is mediated by decision-making processes, and as such, providing nondrug alternatives can shift maladaptive preferences away from drug reinforcers, such as cocaine. Of note, a recent hypothesis suggests that preference for cocaine is simply a byproduct of cocaine intake, such that the 'direct' effects of cocaine weaken the impact of non-drug alternatives while measuring choice. Conversely, existing quantitative theories of decision-making suggest preference is determined by various dimensions of concurrent reinforcers that in turn determine the relative value of available alternatives. Toward teasing apart the conflicting theories above, we developed a novel drug-choice procedure to control for reinforcer frequency and magnitude (two reinforcer dimensions well known to influence preference) that consequently controls for overall cocaine intake. As predicted by quantitative choice theory, results suggest that cocaine intake and preference are dissociable while measuring choice, with reinforcer frequency and magnitude having independent influence on the relative value of choice alternatives. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the choice procedure is sensitive to various manipulations known to alter cocaine reinforcement, all while keeping cocaine intake constant. Finally, the results point to the process of economic substitution as an important avenue of future neurobehavioral investigation toward the improvement of behavioral and pharmacological therapies for substance use disorders. Overall, the proposed choice procedure will allow for improved isolation of the neurobehavioral processes that mediate drug-associated decision-making in future studies.

Conflation of cocaine seeking and cocaine taking responses in IV self-administration experiments in rats: methodological and interpretational considerations

IV drug self-administration is a special case of an operant task. In most operant experiments, the instrumental response that completes the schedule requirement is separate and distinct from the consumptive response (e.g. eating or drinking) that follows the delivery of the reinforcing stimulus. In most IV self-administration studies drug seeking and drug taking responses are conflated. The instrumental lever press or nose poke is also a consumptive response. The conflation of these two response classes has important implications for interpretation of the data as they are differentially regulated by dose and price. The types of pharmacological pretreatments that affect appetitive responses are not necessarily the same as those that affect consumptive responses suggesting that the neurobiology of the two response classes are to some extent controlled by different mechanisms. This review discusses how schedules of reinforcement and behavioral economic analyses can be used to assess the regulation of drug seeking and drug taking separately. New methods are described that allow the examination of appetitive or consumptive responding in isolation and provide subjects with greater control over the self-administered dose. These procedures provide novel insights into the regulation of drug intake. Cocaine intake patterns that result in large, intermittent spikes in cocaine levels are shown to produce increases in appetitive responding (i.e. drug seeking). The mechanisms that control drug intake should be considered distinct from appetitive and motivational processes and should be taken into consideration in future IV self-administration studies.

Examination of behavioral strategies regulating cocaine intake in rats

RATIONALE

It has long been observed that rats self-administer psychostimulants in a highly regular pattern. The inverse relationship between dose and rate of drug intake has been interpreted as a titration phenomenon wherein brain-cocaine levels are maintained within a range. Most studies examining this phenomenon have used fixed, unit doses in which case the only titration strategy available to the animal is to adjust inter-infusion intervals.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we examined whether selection of dose size could also be a factor in regulation of intake. We used a schedule of reinforcement, under which the dose can vary through a wide range and is determined by the behavior of the animal.

METHODS

Rats self-administered cocaine using a behaviorally dependent dosing schedule of reinforcement, under which the size of each dose was determined by the length of time the lever was held down. The concentration of cocaine was changed across sessions.

RESULTS

Total pump-time self-administered decreased by 56 % following each doubling of the concentration, which led to an average 11 % increase in total intake. Similarly, estimated brain levels of cocaine increased by 12 % for each doubling of concentration. These adjustments were the result of manipulation of both the size and spacing of infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previous studies, the regular pattern of intake appears to be the result of a titration mechanism in which animals maintain brain levels of cocaine above some threshold. Compensatory regulation appeared to involve both the selection of dose size and inter-infusion intervals.

Preclinical Determinants of Drug Choice under Concurrent Schedules of Drug Self-Administration

Drug self-administration procedures have played a critical role in the experimental analysis of psychoactive compounds, such as cocaine, for over 50 years. While there are numerous permutations of this procedure, this paper will specifically focus on choice procedures using concurrent schedules of intravenous drug self-administration. The aims of this paper are to first highlight the evolution of drug choice procedures and then review the subsequent preclinical body of literature utilizing these choice procedures to understand the environmental, pharmacological, and biological determinants of the reinforcing stimulus effects of drugs. A main rationale for this paper is our proposition that choice schedules are underutilized in investigating the reinforcing effects of drugs in assays of drug self-administration. Moreover, we will conclude with potential future directions and unexplored scientific space for the use of drug choice procedures.

Cocaine self-administration in rats: hold-down procedures

For decades, researchers have used animal self-administration models to examine the effects drugs of abuse have on physiology and behavior. Sophisticated self-administration procedures have been developed to model many different aspects of drug addiction. The hold-down procedure provides animals with control over the amount of each injection. Holding the lever down turns the syringe pump on and subsequently releasing the lever turns the pump off. In this way, animals can hold the lever down for any duration of time thereby self-administering any dose on a continuous spectrum. This procedure eliminates some of the ambiguity in translating results from effects only observed at one unit dose and allows examination of which dose the animal "prefers" at different times.

Brain-cocaine concentrations determine the dose self-administered by rats on a novel behaviorally dependent dosing schedule

A novel behaviorally dependent dosing (BDD) schedule was used to examine the relationship between doses of cocaine self-administered by rats and brain drug levels within a session. The BDD schedule used a hold-down response to activate a syringe pump. The length of time the lever was held down determined the duration that the syringe pump was activated. In the first experiment, rats self-administered cocaine for daily 3 h sessions and brain levels of cocaine were modeled using well-established parameters. Although analysis revealed that rats self-administered doses within a predicted range, one extremely large dose was consistently observed at the beginning of each session when brain levels of cocaine were low. In the second experiment, we introduced a range of timeout periods (10-25 min) in order to produce variability in brain-cocaine concentrations. Animals self-administered larger doses immediately following each timeout period and the dose size was inversely correlated with the length of the timeout. These results show that the dose of cocaine that rats self-administer within a session is inversely related to the amount of drug on board.

Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount: Effects of the method of reinforcer delivery

Two experiments examined human subjects' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount under different methods of reinforcer delivery. Subjects chose between schedules varying in terms of amount and/or delay of reinforcement, the reinforcer being points exchangeable for money. In Experiment 1, reinforcer amount was manipulated by varying the monetary value of the points across conditions while the number of seconds of access to a consummatory response remained constant. Choice was strongly sensitive to reinforcer amount and indicative of self-control, as in previous experiments. In Experiment 2, reinforcer amount was manipulated by automatically delivering different numbers of points during the amount period, and the consummatory response was eliminated. Sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount was significantly lower than in Experiment 1. Furthermore, the subjects in Experiment 2 exhibited significantly less self-control than did the subjects in Experiment 1. Humans' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount appears to be affected by factors that enhance the discrimi-nability of the consequences of responding.

Cocaine self-administration on a hold-down schedule of reinforcement in rats

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

Although many contingencies operating in the natural environment include continuous dimensions of responses and reinforcers, previous studies of drug self-administration have almost exclusively used discrete dimensions of responses (e.g., a lever press) and reinforcers (e.g., 1.0 mg/kg/injection cocaine). Therefore, the present study provides an initial examination under experimental conditions with both responses and reinforcers measured along continuous dimensions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cocaine-maintained responding was studied in rats under a novel, hold-down schedule of reinforcement wherein the duration of the response was directly related to the magnitude of the reinforcer. These conditions were established by activating the syringe pump when the lever was pressed down and turning the pump off when the lever was released. The concentration of cocaine available in the syringe was varied across sessions.

RESULTS

Cocaine self-administration was readily maintained under these conditions and remained stable across sessions. Responding was concentration dependent, with the number of responses and total duration of the response inversely related to concentration, and overall session intake of cocaine was stable across concentrations. In general, the duration of the responses were less than 0.5 s and did not vary as a function of concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Stability of responding under these schedule conditions was acquired quickly. This schedule of reinforcement may be useful for comparing across drug classes, can be extended for use with other types of responses and reinforcers, and may be more representative of the natural world where response-reinforcer contingencies are more likely to be experienced along continuous, rather than discrete, dimensions.

Quantification of drug choice with the generalized matching law in rhesus monkeys

The generalized matching law provides precise descriptions of choice, but has not been used to characterize choice between different doses of drugs or different classes of drugs. The current study examined rhesus monkeys' drug self-administration choices between identical drug doses, different doses, different drugs (cocaine, remifentanil, and methohexital), and between drug and drug-paired stimuli. The bias parameter of the generalized matching law was used to quantify preference for one reinforcer over another. Choice between identical drug doses yielded undermatching. Choices between 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and either 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil or saline plus drug-paired stimuli revealed bias for the 0.3 microg/kg/injection dose. Choice was relatively insensitive to differences in random interval schedule value when one reinforcer was replaced with drug-paired stimulus presentations. Bias for 0.3 microg/kg/injection remifentanil over 10 microg/kg/injection cocaine was seen in one subject, and indifference was generally observed between 0.1 microg/kg/injection remifentanil and 56 microg/kg/injection cocaine and between 30 microg/kg/injection cocaine and 320 microg/kg/injection methohexital. These findings suggest the bias parameter may be useful in quantitatively measuring level of preference, which would be an advantage over concurrent FR procedures that often result in exclusive choice.

Matching under nonindependent variable-ratio schedules of drug reinforcement

Response-contingent deliveries of oral pentobarbital maintained responding of 3 rhesus monkeys during daily 3-hr sessions. Deliveries of pentobarbital were arranged under nonindependent concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules. Responses to either schedule counted toward completion of both variable-ratio schedule requirements. This schedule is similar in some respects to conventional concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedules, in which passage of time counts toward completion of the interval value on both schedules. Restricted nonindependent concurrent variable-ratio variable-ratio schedules were also studied. On that schedule, when a drug delivery was assigned to one spout, it had to be collected before responses on the opposite spout again counted toward completion of the schedule requirements. Relative reinforcer magnitude was varied by changing the drug concentration on one schedule while keeping the drug concentration constant on the other variable-ratio schedule. Under both types of concurrent variable-ratio schedules, the relative rate of responding corresponded to the relative drug intake. Unlike earlier studies of concurrent variable-interval variable-interval intravenous cocaine reinforcement, preference was proportionate to concentration, and exclusive preferences did not develop. The relationship between relative rate of responding and relative drug intake was well described by the generalized matching law.

Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy

Drug self-administration studies have recently employed progressive ratio (PR) schedules to examine psychostimulant and opiate reinforcement. This review addresses the technical, statistical, and theoretical issues related to the use of the PR schedule in self-administration studies in rats. Session parameters adopted for use in our laboratory and the considerations relevant to them are described. The strengths and weaknesses of the PR schedule are also discussed.

Relative reinforcing effects of different doses of orally delivered cocaine

The relative reinforcing effects of different doses of oral cocaine were investigated in two adult male rhesus monkeys. In the first experiment, a range of cocaine doses (0.1-0.8 mg/ml) was studied with drug and water concurrently available for 3 h each day under identical and independent fixed-ratio schedules. The side positions of the drug and vehicle were alternated from session to session. Drug deliveries always exceeded vehicle deliveries, i.e., orally delivered cocaine functioned as a reinforcer. The highest rates of responding occurred at either the lowest or next to lowest dose (0.1 or 0.2 mg/ml). In the second experiment, pairs of different cocaine doses were systematically presented under identical and independent fixed-ratio schedules. The higher of two concurrently available doses usually maintained the higher response rate. These findings suggest that the relative reinforcing effects of orally delivered cocaine increase with dose. Absolute response rates obtained with single cocaine doses and water concurrently available do not always reflect the magnitude of the reinforcing effects indicated when pairs of cocaine doses are studied together. The results of this study are in agreement with earlier investigations in which the relative reinforcing effects of pairs of intravenous cocaine doses or oral pentobarbital doses were studied. Taken together these findings indicate that, over a range of doses and across pharmacological classes and routes of administration, relative reinforcing effects of a drug increase directly as a function of increases in dose.

Isolation rearing enhances the locomotor response to cocaine and a novel environment, but impairs the intravenous self-administration of cocaine

Male Lister hooded rats were raised from weaning either alone (isolation reared) or in groups of five (socially reared controls). At 5 months of age, experiments began. Experiment 1 examined the effect of isolation rearing upon the locomotor response to a novel environment, and the locomotor stimulant effect of an injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg). Isolation reared animals were more active in a novel environment, and were more responsive to the locomotor stimulant action of cocaine. In succeeding experiments, the effects of isolation rearing on the reinforcing efficacy of intravenous cocaine were assessed. Animals were never "primed" with noncontingent infusions of cocaine at any time during these experiments. In experiment 2, the effect of isolation rearing upon the acquisition of the intravenous self-administration of cocaine was examined. Two levers were present in the operant chambers. Depression of one lever resulted in the intravenous delivery of a 1.5 mg/kg infusion of cocaine, responses on the second, control lever were recorded but had no programmed consequences. Isolation reared animals acquired a selective response on the drug lever at a slower rate than socially reared controls. In experiment 3, a full cocaine dose-response function was examined. Isolation rearing shifted the cocaine dose-response function to the right. In addition, isolation rearing impaired the selectivity of the response on the drug lever at lower doses of cocaine. In experiment 4, the effect of isolation rearing upon the response to a conditioned reinforcer associated previously with cocaine delivery was observed. In the absence of cocaine, the contingent presentation of the conditioned reinforcer enhanced selectively the rate of response by socially reared controls. However, isolation reared animals were unresponsive to this manipulation. These data are discussed with reference to dysfunctional cortico-limbic-striatal systems, and their interactions with the mesoaccumbens dopamine projection.

Animal models of drug craving

Drug craving, the desire to experience the effect(s) of a previously experienced psychoactive substance, has been hypothesized to contribute significantly to continued drug use and relapse after a period of abstinence in humans. In more theoretical terms, drug craving can be conceptualized within the framework of incentive motivational theories of behavior and be defined as the incentive motivation to self-administer a psychoactive substance. The incentive-motivational value of drugs is hypothesized to be determined by a continuous interaction between the hedonic rewarding properties of drugs (incentive) and the motivational state of the organism (organismic state). In drug-dependent individuals, the incentive-motivational value of drugs (i.e., drug craving) is greater compared to non-drug-dependent individuals due to the motivational state (i.e., withdrawal) developed with repeated drug administration. In this conceptual framework, animal models of drug craving would reflect two aspects of the incentive motivation to self-administer a psychoactive substance. One aspect would be the unconditioned incentive (reinforcing) value of the drug itself. The other aspect would be relatively independent of the direct (unconditioned) incentive value of the drug itself and could be reflected in the ability of previously neutral stimuli to acquire conditioned incentive properties that could elicit drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior. Animal models of drug craving that permit the investigation of the behavioral and neurobiological components of these two aspects of drug craving are reviewed and evaluated. The models reviewed are the progressive ratio, choice, extinction, conditioned reinforcement and second-order schedule paradigms. These animal models are evaluated according to two criteria that are established herein as necessary and sufficient criteria for the evaluation of animal models of human psychopathology: reliability and predictive validity. The development of animal models of drug craving will have heuristic value and allow a systematic investigation of the neurobiological mechanisms of craving.

Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent signalled differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates schedules

During daily 3-h sessions two separate pentobarbital solutions were concurrently available to rhesus monkeys under signalled differential-reinforcement-of-low-rates (signalled DRL) schedules of mouth contacts with spouts. The schedules were synchronized so that each time the 30-s DRL interval expired, lights above both spouts were illuminated and a liquid delivery could be obtained either from the left or right spout, but not both. First water and then each of four 'comparison-concentration' pentobarbital solutions (0.0625, 0.25, 1 and 4 mg/ml) were successively available under one schedule for a block of sessions. Concurrently, deliveries of a 'standard concentration' solution were available from the second spout under an identical DRL schedule; the concentration of this standard solution remained constant throughout the testing of the series of comparison solutions. Three pentobarbital concentrations (4, 1 and 0.25 mg/ml) in turn served as the standard concentration. Relative reinforcing effects were directly related to pentobarbital concentration: in general, within pairs of concurrently available pentobarbital solutions more behavior was maintained by the higher of the two drug concentrations. These findings are discussed in the context of previous studies using ratio and interval schedules which have found relative reinforcing effects to be directly related to reinforcer magnitude.

Oral pentobarbital intake in rhesus monkeys: effects of drug concentration under conditions of food deprivation and satiation

Pentobarbital-reinforced behavior was studied in four rhesus monkeys. A pentobarbital solution and water were concurrently available during 3-hr sessions; water was freely available between sessions. Both pentobarbital concentration and feeding conditions (deprivation versus satiation) were varied. In two food-restricted monkeys subsequent food satiation eliminated pentobarbital-maintained responding. In two other food-restricted monkeys the effects of food satiation varied with the drug concentration. At the highest concentration, 4 mg/ml, food satiation did not alter responding, whereas at 2 mg/ml a moderate decrease occurred and at 1 mg/ml responding was greatly reduced. During the food satiation phase, when the concentration was 4 mg/ml, responding was well maintained under several fixed-ratio sizes. Large quantities of pentobarbital were consumed, and intoxication was observed. Water-maintained responding occurred at low rates and did not vary across feeding conditions or drug concentration. The results support an interpretation in terms of a behavioral mechanism of action. Specifically, the effects of food deprivation on drug self-administration are to increase the magnitude of the reinforcing effects of the drug.

Oral self-administration of pentobarbital by rhesus monkeys: relative reinforcing effects under concurrent fixed-ratio schedules

During daily 3-hr sessions, orally delivered pentobarbital solutions and water, or two separate pentobarbital solutions, were concurrently available to rhesus monkeys according to fixed-ratio schedules of mouth contacts with a spout. First water, and then each of four "comparison-concentration" pentobarbital solutions (0.0625, 0.25, 1, and 4 mg/mL), was successively available from one spout for a block of sessions under a fixed-ratio-64 (three monkeys) or fixed-ratio-16 (one monkey) schedule. Under an identically sized fixed-ratio schedule, deliveries of a "standard-concentration" pentobarbital solution were concurrently available from a second spout. The concentration of the standard solution remained unchanged throughout testing of the series of comparison solutions. Each of three pentobarbital concentrations (4, 1, and 0.25 mg/mL) in turn served as the standard concentration. Within each pair of concurrently available solutions, the higher drug concentration maintained more behavior than the lower concentration. Thus when monkeys were provided with concurrent access to different pentobarbital concentrations, relative reinforcing effects were directly related to drug concentration. Further, the amount of behavior maintained by a particular drug concentration was dependent on the concentration of the concurrently available drug solution. Thus, the relative effectiveness of a reinforcer in maintaining behavior is a function of both the reinforcer's magnitude and the availability of alternative reinforcers in the environment.

Preclinical assessment of abuse liability of drugs

Studies that are used in preclinical assessment of the liability of a drug to become an abuse problem are reviewed. These studies examine the capacity of a drug to produce physiological dependence or to function as a reinforcer. Studies that examine physiological dependence by assessing whether a drug reverses signs of withdrawal from a standard drug are rapid, reliable and inexpensive methods for determining if a drug produces dependence of a type similar to the standard. However, these techniques will not determine if the drug produces a unique type of dependence. Studies that examine whether a drug functions as a reinforcer have been predictive of whether a drug will be abused in human populations. Attempts to rank order drugs with respect to their efficacy as reinforcers, however, are not predictive of measures of extent of abuse in human populations. Since abuse of drugs in human populations is a function of societal variables in addition to pharmacological factors, it is unlikely that preclinical assessments will ever yield more than qualitative information on abuse liability of drugs.

Concurrent access to two concentrations of orally delivered phencyclidine: effects of feeding conditions

Two experiments addressed the effects of food satiation and deprivation on oral self-administration of two concurrently available phencyclidine concentrations. In the first experiment, 8 rhesus monkeys self-administered either of two concentrations of phencyclidine ("PCP, angel dust") and water under concurrent fixed-ratio 16 schedules. One concentration was always held constant (0.25 mg/mL) while a series of other phencyclidine concentrations, ranging from 0 (water) to 1.0 mg/mL, was presented in a nonsystematic order. Initially the monkeys were tested while food satiated, and the procedure was then repeated during food deprivation. The monkeys usually selected the higher concentration within the first few minutes of the session, indicating that taste and/or other immediate postingestional effects were important factors. Contrary to a number of previous reports, there were no consistent differences across subjects in the mean number of liquid deliveries or mean drug intake (mg/kg) during food satiation and deprivation. However, for all monkeys the within-session time course of responding during food satiation consistently differed from that during deprivation. A second experiment assessed whether the failure to find consistent differences in drug intake during food satiation and deprivation had been due to the history of concurrent access to different phencyclidine concentrations or to the extended experience with phencyclidine under food-satiation conditions. Six additional monkeys (Group 2) were exposed to the phencyclidine self-administration procedure (during food satiation and deprivation) for the same length of time as the monkeys in Experiment 1 (Group 1), except they received only concurrent access to phencyclidine (0.25 mg/mL) and water. Both groups then received concurrent access to phencyclidine and water during five repeated cycles of food deprivation and satiation. There were also marked individual differences in Group 2: During food satiation, 2 of the monkeys' responding increased, 1 showed no change, and 3 decreased. Examination of a number of historical variables indicated that the greater the percentage of total sessions spent during food satiation with phencyclidine available (before these experiments began), the greater the amounts of phencyclidine consumed during food satiation and the smaller the differences in phencyclidine intake when the two feeding conditions were compared.

Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d,l-cathinone

Previous experiments have shown that both cocaine and d,l-cathinone can function as positive reinforces when delivered intravenously to rhesus monkeys. However, the relative reinforcing efficacies of these compounds have not been established. In the present experiment, three rhesus monkeys were allowed to choose between saline and several doses of d,l-cathinone or cocaine as well as between several doses of both drugs in a discrete-trial choice procedure. Sufficient doses (.05 to .2 mg/kg/injection) of either drug maintained self-administration and the higher doses were reliably preferred to saline. Doses of d,l-cathinone that were preferred to saline were then compared to a range of cocaine doses in drug-drug choice. As the dose of d,l-cathinone that was available was increased, an increase in cocaine dose was necessary to maintain cocaine preference. Comparison of drug-drug choice data to dose combinations predicted to be chosen with equal frequency revealed that the reinforcing efficacy of d,l-cathinone was equivalent to that of cocaine.

Preference in rhesus monkeys given a choice between cocaine and d,l-cathinone

Previous experiments have shown that both cocaine and d,l-cathinone can function as positive reinforces when delivered intravenously to rhesus monkeys. However, the relative reinforcing efficacies of these compounds have not been established. In the present experiment, three rhesus monkeys were allowed to choose between saline and several doses of d,l-cathinone or cocaine as well as between several doses of both drugs in a discrete-trial choice procedure. Sufficient doses (.05 to .2 mg/kg/injection) of either drug maintained self-administration and the higher doses were reliably preferred to saline. Doses of d,l-cathinone that were preferred to saline were then compared to a range of cocaine doses in drug-drug choice. As the dose of d,l-cathinone that was available was increased, an increase in cocaine dose was necessary to maintain cocaine preference. Comparison of drug-drug choice data to dose combinations predicted to be chosen with equal frequency revealed that the reinforcing efficacy of d,l-cathinone was equivalent to that of cocaine.

Ethanol reinforced behavior assessed with a concurrent schedule

Oral ethanol (5% v/v) reinforced responding was studied in three rats using a concurrent fixed ratio (FR) schedule with water available at a second lever. First, concurrent (FR8 FR8) responding on both levers for water presentation was established. Then a concurrent (FR8 FR8) water-ethanol presentation schedule was introduced and a food ration was placed in the chamber at the beginning of the session. Within 12 sessions, ethanol responding developed and within-session feeding was discontinued. When stable concurrent water-ethanol performance was achieved, average ethanol responding was 11 times greater than water responding, even when ethanol availability switched from one level to the other. During the one hour session, in some cases, sufficient ethanol was ingested to produce blood ethanol levels between 30 and 50 mg/100 ml. As the ethanol FR requirement was increased for four sessions each to FR10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 40 and 50, rats continued to respond for ethanol, and in some rats, ethanol preference was maintained even when the ethanol FR was 50 while the water FR remained at 8.

Behavior analysis and experimental pharmacology

This paper provides an introduction to the field of behavioral pharmacology. A brief description of the main characteristics of behavior analysis is followed by a review of the contributions of experimental pharmacology to behavior analysis and vice versa. Finally, a section on new procedures in behavioral pharmacology outlines experimental situations in which complex kinds of behavior can to studied. These include: (a) temporal discrimination; (b) preference to be free and informed; (c) commitment, choice and self-control; and (d) high-order concept formation.

Progressive ratio and fixed ratio schedules of cocaine-maintained responding in baboons

Responding maintained under progressive ratio (PR) and fixed ratio (FR 160) schedules of IV saline or cocaine (0.01-4.0 mg/kg) injections was studied in baboons. Each injection was followed by a time-out period which was 3-h with the PR schedule and was either 3 or 12 with the FR schedule. On the PR schedule the ratio requirement was systematically increased each day until reaching the 'breaking point' at which self-injection performance fell below a criterion level (one or zero injections per day). Overall response rates on the PR schedule increased with progressive increases in the ratio until a maximum at which an abrupt reduction in responding occurred. With the 3-h time-out the dose-breaking point function on the PR schedule was similar to the dose-response rate function on the FR schedule. These dose-effect functions were inverted U-shaped curves characterized by a graded ascending limb (0.01-0.32 mg/kg) and a downturn at the highest doses (3.0-4.0 mg/kg). On the FR schedule the downturn in the dose-response rate function was attributable to a cumulative drug effect as revealed by manipulation of time-out duration and analysis of sequential interresponse time distributions and cumulative response records. PR and FR schedules provide similar information about the relative reinforcing efficacy of different cocaine doses.