Dissecting the conditioned pecking response: an integrated system for the analysis of pecking response parameters

Design and evaluation of a touchscreen apparatus for operant research with pigeons

We developed a touchscreen apparatus for pigeons and conducted a series of experiments that assessed its utility for free-operant procedures. The apparatus incorporated an on-board Windows computer, an electromechanical interface, an amplified speaker, and the touchscreen. We found that merely projecting a virtual key on the screen was insufficient; too many pecks missed the key. Adding a visual target in the center of the key and providing visual feedback for on-key pecks both failed to improve response accuracy. Accuracy was improved by imposing a timeout after off-key pecks or providing a physical boundary around the key. With the physical boundary, response accuracy was comparable to that obtained with conventional plastic keys, and response acquisition via autoshaping also was comparable. Mixing the color elements of the screen's pixels produced color stimuli, but the colors did not function as pure wavelengths of light in tests of stimulus generalization. Both colors and geometric shapes functioned as discriminative stimuli in multiple schedules with variable-interval and extinction components or rich and lean fixed-ratio components. In general, our touchscreen apparatus is a viable alternative to conventional pigeon chambers and increases the experimenter's options for visual stimuli, auditory stimuli, and the number and location of response keys.

Trigeminal deafferentation and conditioned pecking in pigeons

To clarify the contribution of peripheral trigeminal input to the control of pecking behavior we examined head and jaw movement kinematics and peck localization in pigeons with surgical section of trigeminal nerves providing somatosensory input to the beak. Conditioning procedures were used to bring the pecking/grasping components of pecking under the control of a visual target. Conditioned head and jaw movements were monitored 'on-line' using movement transducers and terminal peck location was recorded using 'touch-screen' technology. The periodic delivery of a food reinforcer provided repeated opportunities to monitor the kinematics of ingestive pecks. Deafferentation produced deficits in mandibulation during ingestive pecking and in the coordination of head and jaw movements during conditioned pecking. These results are attributed to disruptions in trigeminal feedback and feedforward mechanisms, respectively. In contrast with previous studies, deafferentation did not impair the precision of peck localization. Possible reasons for the absence of localization deficits are presented. The results are discussed in relation to the role of peripheral inputs in the control of prehensile movements.

Conditioned 'prehension' in the pigeon: kinematics, coordination and stimulus control of the pecking response

Like human prehensile behavior, the pigeon's ingestive pecking response is elicited by visual stimuli conveying information about the location and size of the target. This information is used to generate localized ingestive pecks whose gapes are amplitude-scaled to seed size, prior to contact. We employed high-resolution, 'real-time' monitoring of head acceleration, jaw movements and terminal peck location to examine the kinematics, coordination and stimulus control of conditioned pecking. Conditioning procedures were used to bring pecking under the control of visual targets whose stimulus properties (size, location) were independently varied, while simultaneously monitoring pecking response parameters. Stimulus control of the transport component (peck localization) is extremely precise, even in the absence of a specific localization-dependent reinforcement contingency. Subjects also showed amplitude-scaling of gape size to the size of a visual target, but over a more restricted range than shown to food pellets of comparable sizes. Comparison of the kinematic profiles of conditioned and ingestive pecks suggests that conditioned pecking is functionally analogous to human 'pointing' rather than 'grasping' behavior.

Feed pecking in young chickens: new techniques of evaluation

Three techniques were compared: automated recording (A) of 2 h of feeding activities conveyed to a computer by constantly connected electronic balances, videotaping (V) of a closeup of the head of a chick during a feed-pecking session analyzed by focal sampling at reduced speed (16 times slower), strength of pecking (S) at feed particles recorded from a feeder-weight signal conveyed to a computer by a customized electronic balance at rapid speed (24 times/s). These techniques were applied to 16-18-day-old chicks fed either a complete feed or a split diet (whole grain wheat + a complementary feed). The two feeds had similar pellet forms. The complementary feed particles were eaten at a slower rate than the complete feed particles (A and V techniques). Wheat grains were pecked with a weaker measured strength than the pellets (technique S). Two pecks of three did not result in prehension of a feed particle and were categorized as "exploratory" pecks. For 75% of the time during a continuous pecking session the head of the chick was in a static position, suggesting a long period of observation of the feed between 2 consecutive pecks. Videotaping with slow-motion focal sampling (V) offers potential development for the study of food intake behavior of chickens.