The role of dopamine in reinforcement: changes in reinforcement sensitivity induced by D1-type, D2-type, and nonselective dopamine receptor agonists

The Role of Retinal Dopamine D1 Receptors in Ocular Growth and Myopia Development in Mice

Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter in the signaling cascade controlling ocular refractive development, but the exact role and site of action of dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) involved in myopia remains unclear. Here, we determine whether retinal D1Rs exclusively mediate the effects of endogenous dopamine and systemically delivered D1R agonist or antagonist in the mouse form deprivation myopia (FDM) model. Male C57BL/6 mice subjected to unilateral FDM or unobstructed vision were divided into the following four groups: one noninjected and three groups that received intraperitoneal injections of a vehicle, D1R agonist SKF38393 (18 and 59 nmol/g), or D1R antagonist SCH39166 (0.1 and 1 nmol/g). The effects of these drugs on FDM were further assessed in Drd1-knock-out (Drd1-KO), retina-specific conditional Drd1-KO (Drd1-CKO) mice, and corresponding wild-type littermates. In the visually unobstructed group, neither SKF38393 nor SCH39166 affected normal refractive development, whereas myopia development was attenuated by SKF38393 and enhanced by SCH39166 injections. In Drd1-KO or Drd1-CKO mice, however, these drugs had no effect on FDM development, suggesting that activation of retinal D1Rs is pertinent to myopia suppression by the D1R agonist. Interestingly, the development of myopia was unchanged by either Drd1-KO or Drd1-CKO, and neither SKF38393 nor SCH39166 injections, nor Drd1-KO, affected the retinal or vitreal dopamine and the dopamine metabolite DOPAC levels. Effects on axial length were less marked than effects on refraction. Therefore, activation of D1Rs, specifically retinal D1Rs, inhibits myopia development in mice. These results also suggest that multiple dopamine D1R mechanisms play roles in emmetropization and myopia development.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While dopamine is recognized as a "stop" signal that inhibits myopia development (myopization), the location of the dopamine D1 receptors (D1Rs) that mediate this action remains to be addressed. Answers to this key question are critical for understanding how dopaminergic systems regulate ocular growth and refraction. We report here the results of our study showing that D1Rs are essential for controlling ocular growth and myopia development in mice, and for identifying the retina as the site of action for dopaminergic control via D1Rs. These findings highlight the importance of intrinsic retinal dopaminergic mechanisms for the regulation of ocular growth and suggest specific avenues for exploring the retinal mechanisms involved in the dopaminergic control of emmetropization and myopization.

Altered dopaminergic regulation of the dorsal striatum is able to induce tic-like movements in juvenile rats

Motor tics are sudden, repetitive, involuntary movements representing the hallmark behaviors of the neurodevelopmental disease Tourette’s syndrome (TS). The primary cause of TS remains unclear. The initial observation that dopaminergic antagonists alleviate tics led to the development of a dopaminergic theory of TS etiology which is supported by post mortem and in vivo studies indicating that non-physiological activation of the striatum could generate tics. The striatum controls movement execution through the balanced activity of dopamine receptor D1 and D2-expressing medium spiny neurons of the direct and indirect pathway, respectively. Different neurotransmitters can activate or repress striatal activity and among them, dopamine plays a major role. In this study we introduced a chronic dopaminergic alteration in juvenile rats, in order to modify the delicate balance between direct and indirect pathway. This manipulation was done in the dorsal striatum, that had been associated with tic-like movements generation in animal models. The results were movements resembling tics, which were categorized and scored according to a newly developed rating scale and were reduced by clonidine and riluzole treatment. Finally, post mortem analyses revealed altered RNA expression of dopaminergic receptors D1 and D2, suggesting an imbalanced dopaminergic regulation of medium spiny neuron activity as being causally related to the observed phenotype.

Animal models of obsessive-compulsive disorder: utility and limitations

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling and common neuropsychiatric condition of poorly known etiology. Many attempts have been made in the last few years to develop animal models of OCD with the aim of clarifying the genetic, neurochemical, and neuroanatomical basis of the disorder, as well as of developing novel pharmacological and neurosurgical treatments that may help to improve the prognosis of the illness. The latter goal is particularly important given that around 40% of patients with OCD do not respond to currently available therapies. This article summarizes strengths and limitations of the leading animal models of OCD including genetic, pharmacologically induced, behavioral manipulation-based, and neurodevelopmental models according to their face, construct, and predictive validity. On the basis of this evaluation, we discuss that currently labeled "animal models of OCD" should be regarded not as models of OCD but, rather, as animal models of different psychopathological processes, such as compulsivity, stereotypy, or perseverance, that are present not only in OCD but also in other psychiatric or neurological disorders. Animal models might constitute a challenging approach to study the neural and genetic mechanism of these phenomena from a trans-diagnostic perspective. Animal models are also of particular interest as tools for developing new therapeutic options for OCD, with the greatest convergence focusing on the glutamatergic system, the role of ovarian and related hormones, and the exploration of new potential targets for deep brain stimulation. Finally, future research on neurocognitive deficits associated with OCD through the use of analogous animal tasks could also provide a genuine opportunity to disentangle the complex etiology of the disorder.

Effects of the 5HT2C antagonist SB242084 on the pramipexole-induced potentiation of water contrafreeloading, a putative animal model of compulsive behavior

RATIONALE

In rats, quinpirole, a dopaminergic D2/D3 receptor agonist, elicits both hyperdipsia and water "contrafreeloading" (CFL), a putative model of compulsivity. The role of D3 receptors in this effect remains unclear. Clomipramine (CIM) was found to contrast both hyperdipsia and CFL, but the role of serotonin in this effect requires further investigation.

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effects of the preferential D3 agonist pramipexole (PPX) in both models. Furthermore, we tested the sensitivity of PPX-induced CFL to CIM and to the 5HT2c antagonist SB242084.

METHODS

In experiment 1, drinking was measured at 2 and 5 h after eight daily injections of PPX (0 to 1.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally). In the CFL study, every other third lever press, the rat was reinforced by the delivery of water. On days 1-6, water was only available upon lever pressing. On days 7-15, choice between response-contingent and free access was provided. PPX doses as in the experiment 1 were given. In two further experiments, PPX (0.5 mg/kg) was administered alone or in combination with CIM (5 or 10 mg/kg) or SB242084 (0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg).

RESULTS

PPX did not produce hyperdipsia but enhanced spontaneous CFL. SB242084 attenuated PPX-induced CFL more effectively than CIM, restoring the preference for free access to water.

CONCLUSIONS

CFL, but not polydipsia, was induced by preferential D3 activation, an effect prevented by 5HT2c receptor blockade. Since PPX interferes with decision making and 5HT2c receptor supersensitivity is involved in the expression of compulsive behaviors, this study supports the compulsive nature of dopaminergic-induced CFL.

Clomipramine, but not haloperidol or aripiprazole, inhibits quinpirole-induced water contrafreeloading, a putative animal model of compulsive behavior

RATIONALE

Repeated administrations of the D2/D3 agonist quinpirole (QNP) to rats elicit an antieconomical pattern of drinking called "contrafreeloading" (CFL), a putative model of compulsive-like behavior.

OBJECTIVES

We tested the sensitivity of QNP-induced CFL to haloperidol (HAL), aripiprazole (ARI), and clomipramine (CIM), the latter proven effective in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).

METHODS

Rats were trained under a schedule of reinforcement (FR3) for water. On days 1-6, water was only available through lever pressing. On days 7-15, a choice between operant and free access was provided. QNP 0.5 mg/kg was administered alone or in combination with HAL (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg), ARI (0.3 or 1 mg/kg), or CIM (5 or 10 mg/kg).

RESULTS

Acutely QNP suppressed operant behavior and, therefore, water intake; upon repeated administrations, tolerance developed to this suppressant effect on responding but only to a lesser extent to the antidipsic effect. In choice conditions, QNP induced a progressive preference for the operant access (CFL). HAL per se, but not CIM and ARI, significantly reduced both responding and drinking (operant phase). In the choice phase, HAL and CIM inhibited CFL, but only the latter reinstated total water intake. ARI, in combination with QNP, increased responding.

CONCLUSIONS

CIM reinstates control patterns of drinking, while HAL and ARI where partially or not effective at all, respectively. As far as CIM is considered a first line treatment in OCD, these results further strengthen the notion that QNP-induced CFL belongs to the realm of dopaminergic drug-induced compulsive behaviors.

The influence of cost manipulation on water contrafreeloading induced by repeated exposure to quinpirole in the rat

RATIONALE

Quinpirole (QNP), a D2/D3 dopaminergic receptor agonist, was found to elicit an apparently antieconomical drinking behavior called contrafreeloading (CFL). The perseverative operant responding observed may represent a compulsive-like behavior prompted by sensitization to the effects of QNP.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, we investigated the effect of different response costs on instrumental behavior and CFL in rats repeatedly treated with QNP (0.5 mg/kg i.p.). Moreover, we studied the consummatory components of ingestive behavior in no-choice paradigms and the role of learned operant conditioning in free drinking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In experiment 1, rats were trained to perform under three different fixed ratio schedules of reinforcement (FR1, FR3, and FR10) and were given a choice between operant and free access to water. In experiment 2, rats were divided into four groups, each one resembling experiment 1 in one or more features, with no choice available and water consumption measured at an interval of 0-60 min.

RESULTS

(a) Increasing FR significantly reduced CFL % in saline -- but not in QNP-injected groups; (b) under free-drinking conditions, QNP caused a progressive hypodipsic effect which was, however, contrasted by maintaining cues formerly contingent on operant access to water; and (c) under CFL conditions QNP-treated rats drank more than under free access conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

QNP confers rigidity in responding for water, impeding adaptation to different contingencies for access to the resource. In QNP-treated rats, CFL behavior appears adaptive as far as it allows animals to partially circumvent the hypodipsic effect of the drug.

Changes in sensitivity of response distributions to changing reinforcement ratios during exposure to ephedrine, caffeine, and ephedrine-caffeine combinations

Changes in the sensitivity of response distributions to changes in reward distribution (reinforcer distribution sensitivity) were examined when rats were exposed to low and moderate doses of caffeine, ephedrine, and caffeine-ephedrine combinations. The data show significant decreases in sensitivity in response distributions to changes in reward schedule values during exposure to caffeine and ephedrine/caffeine combinations, whereas ephedrine alone resulted in overmatching comparable with baseline and NaCl conditions. Rats treated either with 3.0-mg/kg or 10.0-mg/kg doses of caffeine and all combinations of ephedrine at doses of 1.8 or 5.6 mg/kg with caffeine at 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg showed reduced sensitivity in response distributions to differences in reinforcement schedule ratios. In contrast, when rats were exposed to ephedrine at 1.8 or 5.6 mg/kg, they maintained or increased the degree of overmatching. Although reinforcer distribution sensitivity was altered, drug exposure did not significantly affect the absolute rates of responding. Bias varied after exposure to caffeine, ephedrine, and their combinations, but not systematically. Finally, whereas the estimates of goodness of fit (r2) to the matching equation showed some decreases during drug exposure, these were neither statistically significant nor correlated with drug dose. These results suggest differential effects of ephedrine and caffeine on the sensitivity of response distributions to changes in reinforcement ratio distributions, with deleterious effects of caffeine and ephedrine/caffeine combinations.

Regulation of firing of dopaminergic neurons and control of goal-directed behaviors

There are several brain regions that have been implicated in the control of motivated behavior and whose disruption leads to the pathophysiology observed in major psychiatric disorders. These systems include the ventral hippocampus, which is involved in context and focus on tasks, the amygdala, which mediates emotional behavior, and the prefrontal cortex, which modulates activity throughout the limbic system to enable behavioral flexibility. Each of these systems has overlapping projections to the nucleus accumbens, where these inputs are integrated under the modulatory influence of dopamine. Here, we provide a systems-oriented approach to interpreting the function of the dopamine system, its modulation of limbic-cortical interactions and how disruptions within this system might underlie the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and drug abuse.

Apomorphine effects on frog locomotor behavior

The neuroanatomical pathways of the DA systems have been shown to be largely conserved across many vertebrate taxa. It is less certain whether the structural similarities seen between mammals and amphibians reflect a similar functional homology. DA is well known for its role in facilitating motor behaviors in mammals. We examined whether a similar role for DA exists in amphibians using the Northern Leopard Frog (Rana pipiens). We investigated the effects of the nonspecific DA agonist, apomorphine (APO) on a complex motor task that included two distinct components known to be differentially modulated by DA in mammals: swimming and climbing. We demonstrated that a high single dose of APO (20 mg/kg, body weight) strongly increased the amount of time spent completing the motor task. Furthermore, we showed that although APO did not significantly alter several aspects of swimming behavior, two aspects of climbing behavior were disrupted. Both climbing speed and climbing ability were impaired by APO treatment. These results increase our understanding of DA function in amphibians and add to our understanding of structure-function homologies of dopamine function across vertebrate taxa.